Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
LABOR DEPARTMENT
IN THE MATTER OF
LOCAL 196, AFSCME, COUNCIL 4/
CARLA BOLAND
DECEMBER 29, 2006
-AND-
RENEE JACKSON
A P P E A R A N C E S:
Renee Jackson
Pro Se
PROCEDURAL ORDER
On November 9, 2006 the parties in the above-captioned case appeared before the
Labor Board for the continuance of a formal hearing. During that hearing, the Labor
Board ordered the Complainant to produce for the Labor Board’s in camera inspection, a
copy of a settlement agreement between the Complainant and the Connecticut Lottery
Corporation.
A hearing scheduled for December 14, 2006 was postponed at the request of the
Respondent. A hearing scheduled for December 20, 2006 was postponed at the request
of the Complainant. Since the hearing on November 9, 2006 the following documents
have been filed by the parties:
1. A request for subpoena duces tecum directed to Linn Miller for production of “a
copy of a document Carla Boland received in the mail May 8, 2004” filed by the
Complainant on November 13, 2006.
5. Request to compel production of any items held in abeyance from the subpoena
dated July 20, 2006 directed to the Connecticut Lottery Corporation, filed by the
Complainant on December 20, 2006 and December 21, 2006.
10. Request for subpoena duces tecum directed to the Connecticut Lottery
Corporation for production of “a copy of any agreement(s) entered into in 2004
between the CT Lottery Corporation and Renee Jackson regarding the disposition
of Renee Jackson’s employment” and for the appearance of “any individual who
has knowledge of and is able to provide testimony about the purported 2004
“confidential “ settlement agreement supposedly entered into between the CT
Lottery Corporation and Renee Jackson. If this agreement exists, this same
individual must have the legal ability to authorize, in writing, the release of this
purported agreement to the State Board of Labor Relations” filed by the
Complainant on December 26, 2006.
Having fully considered the requests and arguments of the parties on all the above
matters and to ensure orderly progress of the hearing in this matter, we issue the
following order.
2
ORDER
By virtue of and pursuant to the powers vested in the Connecticut State Board of
Labor Relations by the State Employee Relations Act, it is hereby ORDERED that:
6. The Complainant’s request to amend the complaint to add individual Linn Miller
as a respondent is DENIED.
10. No postponement requests will be granted to either party regarding the hearing
scheduled for January 4, 2007.
3
CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS
Patricia V. Low
Patricia V. Low
Board Member
Wendella A. Battey
Wendella A. Battey
Board Member
4
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed postage prepaid this 29th
day of December, 2006 to the following:
Renee Jackson
192 Country Lane RRR
East Hartford, CT 06118
________________________
Jaye Bailey, General Counsel
CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF LABOR RELATIONS