CHAPTER IV FINDING AND DISCUSSION

As already mentioned in the first chapter, this study intended to provide a pattern of how the teaching of English, appropriate in studying verb-ing technique using a combination style of writing mind mapping and association methods. In addition, this study was to determine how deep the students can master the lessons verb-ing especially in learning gerund by using patterns of learning that is applied by the researcher. To complement all this, researcher has gained very significant results in the development of the students in grasping the lessons learned as an object of research, although researcher has only done one cycle in this study, researcher has found many changes and improvements in students as a form of self-improvement in value and of their learning. In the cycle given by the researcher, there are three sessions that have been conducted to see the development of treatments that have been given in which the treatment was given in the form of post-test. In this case, researchers collected two kinds of data: quantitative data and qualitative data. Quantitative data are collected based on the results already obtained from post-test results of students from each session in the first cycle. As for the qualitative data obtained based on the questionnaire given to students as a form of comparison between the patterns previously learned by studying the pattern given by the researchers at the end of the first session. All Components are mentioned in this chapter as a form of discovery and discussion.

41

42

4.1 Overview As described previously, the main purpose of this study was to determine whether the combination of mind mapping techniques and associations are able to enhance students' skills in studying the gerund or not. This is an important concern for further action on student progress in learning, so that researchers can determine the level of change and improvement in student learning, and success and effectiveness of treatment formula given by researchers. Having observed from the findings, researcher could say that the students ability in learning verbing was really improved through combining mind mapping and association method. So the researcher concluded that the technique of teaching that was given is effective in teaching verb-ing forms. The researcher was presented in three stages those were discussion of the initial reflection (pre-test), cycle I, and Cycle II.

4.1.1 The Result of Pre-Test The pre-test was conducted on Thursday, January 5 th 2012 to the eleventh grade students of SMAN 3 Denpasar. The result of pre-test was taken in order to know the students prior knowledge of learning verb-ing before the action was held. The mean scores on pre-test was 4. The average score of the correct answer made by students was 40, it means that the percentage of the correct answer made by students was 40%. This score was low in term of level mastery. The students had low ability in mastering verb-ing forms. For further information about the result of the pre-test, the following table should be referred to:

43

The Result of Pre-test Total Items 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Items Answered Correctly Total 50 50 50 40 30 50 30 30 50 50 50 50 40 40 30 20 30 50 20 40 30 % 50% 50% 50% 40% 30% 50% 30% 30% 50% 50% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 20% 30% 50% 20% 40% 30% 50 50 50 40 30 50 30 30 50 50 50 50 40 40 30 20 30 50 20 40 30 Level of Mastery Almost Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough Low Very Low Almost Enough Very Low Very Low Almost Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough Low Low Very Low Bad Very Low Almost Enough Bad Low Very Low

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21.

Name of Students
Ade Kusuma W Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N Agung Saraswati, I.A Angga Mahaputra Ariani, Ni Kadek Aryadi, Made Aryadinata, I.A.N Astradita Djelantik, I.MD Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A Destarita Rahmawati Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan Doddy Haryadi , Pande M Dwi Widyantari, Made Dwija Santika, I Kdk. Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt Ekayana Paramardika P.IP Febriantow Sukahet, IDM Indah Purnamayanti, N.W Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G

Score

44

22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38.

Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd Meka Raini, Putu Ayu Nurul Laelly Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari Prawira Aria R., I. Md Prayuni Danamukti, I.A Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. Sri Adnyasari, Putu Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk Surya Pradipta N., IGNA Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt Very Ade Andreana, Kdk Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA Wiana Baskara, IGAN Wiracana, I Made Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

50 40 50 50 40 50 20 40 40 40 40 50 30 50 40 30 30 X1 = 4

50% 40% 50% 50% 40% 50% 20% 40% 40% 40% 40% 50% 30% 50% 40% 30% 30% X2 = 40%

50 40 50 50 40 50 20 40 40 40 40 50 30 50 40 30 30 X3 = 40

Almost Enough Low Almost Enough Almost Enough Low Almost Enough Bad Low Low Low Low Almost Enough Very Low Almost Enough Low Very Low Very Low Low

N = 38

N X1 X2 X3

= The total number of the students = The average scores of correct students answer = The percentage of correct students answer = The students mean score

45

4.1.1.1 Reflection The researcher tried to obtain the exact data about the students weakness in learning verb-ing forms and know the students ability in mastering verb-ing forms. Based on the result of pre-test, there were some possible factors that made the students obtained low scores. First of all, the students were not well prepared for having a test since the researcher did not inform the students of eleventh grade previously that they were going to have a test. As the result, most of the students seemed not ready to answer the test. Second, the students didnt know well about how to differ gerund and participle deeply, so this is the main case that the researcher wanted to give as the solution in mastering verb-ing forms.

4.1.2 Cycle I 4.1.2.1 Planning Planning the materials that wanted to give before the action was conducted, the researcher made some preparation, namely: a. Selecting material to be used in the class b. Preparing teaching learning scenario c. Considering the time allocation given to the subject d. Preparing the instrument needed in doing the observation e. Making the post-test

46

4.1.2.2 Action Action involves the teaching learning process. There were pre-activities, whilstactivities, and post-activities. The activity of each stage would be presented below: Activity Teacher Greeting the students Checking the students attendance list Introducing and giving some examples about the material to the students Asking the students to answer the questions given by teacher Introducing the mind mapping technique and association method to the students Giving the examples about how to use the mind mapping and association method in learning verb-ing forms Asking the students to give the explanation about verbing forms Giving the students chance to ask and to do the post test about the material that has been discussed Concluding the materials that have been given to the students Ending the class by saying Good Morning Class and See You Next Time Students The students greet the teacher The students raise their hand Listening and taking a note the examples given by the teacher Answering the questions given by the teacher The student pay close attention to the teachers explanation about how to make mind mapping and association in learning verbing forms The students pay close attention to the teachers explanation and write the explanations Giving the examples of verb-ing forms The students ask and do the post test about the material that has been discussed Paying attention to the teachers conclusion Students say Good Morning Teacher and See You Next Time

Pre-Test

WhilstActivity

PostActivity

47

Those activities were carried out on Thursday and Saturday, from January 5th to 14th 2012 that was the time for doing the first and second meeting of cycle, so in a month the researcher could finish the research. The researcher planned all the things carefully and well in order to conduct the class. The action included some activities, namely: pre-activity, whilst-activity, post-activity. Those actions had been well done in the first and second meeting.

4.1.2.3 The Results of the Observation The research observed classroom situation during the action conducted. The researcher tried observing the students attitude toward the teaching learning process and finding out the problems faced by students during the action. The observation sheet was developed in the form of teachers diary which is consisted of three phases, namely: pre-activity, whilst-activity, post-activity. Examining the result of the post-test, the researcher wanted to know the weakness of the technique and method that were used. For detailed information about the students achievements are presented as follow: The Result of Post-Test Session I Total Items 10 10 10 10 10 Items Answered Correctly Total 5 5 6 5 4 % 50% 50% 60% 50% 40% 50 50 60 50 40 Level of Mastery Almost Enough Almost Enough Enough Almost Enough Low

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Name of Students
Ade Kusuma W Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N Agung Saraswati, I.A Angga Mahaputra Ariani, Ni Kadek

Score

48

6. 7. 8. 9.

Aryadi, Made Aryadinata, I.A.N Astradita Djelantik, I.MD Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

6 5 5 7 6 7 6 5 5 5 4 4 6 4 5 4 5 5 6 6 5 6 3 5

60% 50% 50% 70% 60% 70% 60% 50% 50% 50% 40% 40% 60% 40% 50% 40% 50% 50% 60% 60% 50% 50% 30% 50%

60 50 50 70 60 70 60 50 50 50 40 40 60 40 50 40 50 50 60 60 50 60 30 50

Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough More Enough Enough More Enough Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough Low Low Enough Low Almost Enough Low Almost Enough Almost Enough Enough Enough Almost Enough Enough Very Low Almost Enough

10. Destarita Rahmawati 11. Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 12. Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 14. Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 15. Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 16. Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 17. Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 18. Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 20. Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 21. Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 22. Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 23. Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 24. Nurul Laelly 25. Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 26. Prawira Aria R., I. Md 27. Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 28. Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 29. Sri Adnyasari, Putu

49

30. Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 31. Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 33. Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 34. Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 35. Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 36. Wiana Baskara, IGAN 37. Wiracana, I Made 38. Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd N = 38

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

5 6 5 6 5 6 5 4 4 X1 = 5,15

50% 60% 50% 60% 50% 60% 50% 40% 40% X2 = 51,5%

50 60 50 60 50 60 50 40 40 X3 = 51,5

Almost Enough Enough Almost Enough Enough Almost Enough Enough Almost Enough Low Low Almost Enough

The Result of Post-Test Session II Total Items 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Items Answered Correctly Total 6 5 5 6 6 7 6 7 6 9 % 60% 50% 50% 60% 60% 70% 60% 70% 60% 90% 60 50 50 60 60 70 60 70 60 90 Level of Mastery Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough Enough Enough More Enough Enough More Enough Enough Very Good

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Name of Students
Ade Kusuma W Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N Agung Saraswati, I.A Angga Mahaputra Ariani, Ni Kadek Aryadi, Made Aryadinata, I.A.N Astradita Djelantik, I.MD Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A

Score

10. Destarita Rahmawati

50

11. Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 12. Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 14. Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 15. Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 16. Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 17. Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 18. Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 20. Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 21. Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 22. Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 23. Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 24. Nurul Laelly 25. Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 26. Prawira Aria R., I. Md 27. Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 28. Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 29. Sri Adnyasari, Putu 30. Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 31. Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 33. Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 34. Very Ade Andreana, Kdk

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

7 6 6 6 7 6 5 7 5 6 5 6 6 9 7 6 6 5 6 6 7 5 7 6

70% 60% 60% 60% 70% 60% 50% 70% 50% 60% 50% 60% 60% 90% 70% 60% 60% 50% 60% 60% 70% 50% 70% 60%

70 60 60 60 80 60 50 70 50 60 50 60 60 90 70 60 60 50 60 60 70 50 70 60

More Enough Enough Enough Enough Good Enough Almost Enough More Enough Almost Enough Enough Almost Enough Enough Enough Very Good More Enough Enough Enough Almost Enough Enough Enough More Enough Almost Enough More Enough Enough

51

35. Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 36. Wiana Baskara, IGAN 37. Wiracana, I Made 38. Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd N = 38

10 10 10 10

7 7 5 5 X1 = 6,21

70% 70% 50% 50% X2 = 62,1%

70 70 50 50 X3 = 62,1

More Enough More Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough Enough

The Result of Post-Test Session III Total Items 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Items Answered Correctly Total 7 6 7 6 6 8 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 % 70% 60% 70% 60% 60% 80% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 60% 70% 70% 70 60 70 60 60 80 70 70 70 70 70 60 70 70 Level of Mastery More Enough Enough More Enough Enough Enough Good More Enough More Enough More Enough More Enough More Enough Enough More Enough More Enough

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Name of Students
Ade Kusuma W Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N Agung Saraswati, I.A Angga Mahaputra Ariani, Ni Kadek Aryadi, Made Aryadinata, I.A.N Astradita Djelantik, I.MD Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A

Score

10. Destarita Rahmawati 11. Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 12. Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 14. Dwija Santika, I Kdk.

52

15. Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 16. Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 17. Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 18. Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 20. Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 21. Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 22. Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 23. Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 24. Nurul Laelly 25. Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 26. Prawira Aria R., I. Md 27. Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 28. Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 29. Sri Adnyasari, Putu 30. Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 31. Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 33. Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 34. Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 35. Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 36. Wiana Baskara, IGAN 37. Wiracana, I Made 38. Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

8 7 6 7 7 6 6 7 8 8 8 7 6 5 5 7 7 6 7 6 7 7 5 6

80% 70% 60% 70% 70% 60% 60% 70% 80% 80% 80% 70% 60% 50% 50% 70% 70% 60% 70% 60% 70% 70% 50% 60%

80 70 60 70 70 60 60 70 80 80 80 70 60 50 50 70 70 60 70 60 70 70 60 60

Good More Enough Enough More Enough More Enough Enough Enough More Enough Good Good Good More Enough Enough Almost Enough Almost Enough More Enough More Enough Enough More Enough Enough More Enough More Enough Enough Enough

53

N = 38

X1 = 6,71

X2 = 67,1%

X3 = 67,1

Enough

N X1 X2 X3

= The total number of the students = The average scores of correct students answer = The percentage of correct students answer = The students mean score The result of the test in the first cycle showed that there was an

improvement made by the students. It can be seen from the results of the test where the average score of students mastery on the last test conducted on the first cycle was 67,1. The correct answer made by students was 6,71, it means that the percentage of the correct answer was 67,1%.

4.1.2.4 Reflection After the researchers had analyzed the findings in the first cycle, it was found that the increase in student mastery of verb-ing forms had been realized, and had earned a good improvement, although there were still many deficiencies. Researchers had been able to make improvements, both in motivation and improvement materials that had been given. From the overall results had been made in the first cycle, the researcher was not still satisfied so that made researchers want to further enhance students' ability to learn the verb-ing. This was done because the researchers had observed there were many students who had not developed fully in this matter, so the success of the techniques and methods were given apparent in this study, the

54

researchers decided to create a second cycle to the desired success could be achieved by researchers in this study.

4.1.3 Cycle II 4.1.3.1 Planning Based on the reflection done in the first cycle, the researcher had a new plan to apply a different action in second cycle. Like the planning in the first cycle, the preparation would be conducted as follows: a. Selecting material to be used in the class b. Preparing teaching learning scenario c. Considering the time allocation given to the subject d. Preparing the instrument needed in doing the observation e. Making the post-test

4.1.3.2 Action a. Pre-activities 1. Greeting the students 2. Checking the students attendance list 3. Giving warming up / brainstorming b. Whilst-activities 1. Giving the explanation of verb-ing forms through combining mind mapping and association 2. Giving the examples about how to use the mind mapping and association method in learning verb-ing forms

55

3. Asking the students to give the explanation about verb-ing forms 4. Monitoring the students and trying to find what is their difficulties in learning verb-ing forms 5. Checking the answer 6. Giving the individual task for finding the individual improvement score considered as the post-test of cycle II. c. Post-activities 1. Giving a short motivation 2. Giving questionnaire 3. Ending the class In action that was divided into three session. The reader can see each session by following as: A. Session 1 The first meeting of second cycle was conducted on Thursday, January 19th 2012. Before conducting this session, the researcher firstly made some preparation. As usual, researcher entered into the classroom and gave a warm greeting to the students continued to read out and then brainstormed. After giving the brainstorming and it appeared that the students were ready to learn, the researcher conditioning the class to learn by giving special emphasis and attention in learning in the classroom. Researchers began to pay special attention to students who were considered to have a low value. Learning pattern was made as easy as possible to keep the attention focused and not boring, researcher also did a little joke as a break for a moment before giving a post-test at the first session on the second

56

cycle. After giving the main material in the first session, the researchers then provided post-test as a material for the evaluation to the next session. Researcher asked students to discuss a little about how to learn their weaknesses, and provide solutions and motivation. The activities were expected to be able to create a great interaction that can trigger the desire to learn of students.

B. Session 2 At the second meeting on Thursday, 26th January 2012, the researchers redoing the same activity as had been done at the beginning of the session in the second cycle. The only difference is the provision of brainstorming, the researchers asked students to discuss for a moment about what had passed. Then directing them to the verb-ing lessons learned by reminding them how the use of notes using mind mapping techniques. The provision of post-test was still being done at the end of the lesson before the lesson was over. Of course, by providing the opportunity for students to rest their minds for a moment with a story or a bit of motivation stories, researchers found that the closeness between the researcher with the students were very well established, this could all be seen from their enthusiasm in learning and answering questions properly.

C. Session The third session was the last session in the second cycle. That was conducted on Saturday, January 28th 2012. In this last session, the researchers totally focused on issue that was known by researchers in the observations that

57

was recorded. Researcher tried to make the last meeting to provide a clear improvement of the verb-ing was taught in the classroom. Brainstorming and short questions presented to students as a reminder of the material that was taught. Therefore, researchers finally found the clarity of meaning in this final session. The students found a solution how to answer that better than ever, and the expected improvement has been proven. All the records post-test assessments are following the increase can be seen in the diagram form.

4.1.3.3 The result of the observation The results are comparable to the second cycle that looks to an increase that occurred after the students were given the object of research in the application of verb-ing through combining mind mapping and association. From this diagram we can see the progress that has occurred, and the increase in effective learning outcomes. So the researchers felt that the techniques and methods have been effective in learning verb-ing. The Result of Post-Test Session I in cycle II Total Items 10 10 10 10 10 Items Answered Correctly Total 7 8 9 8 7 % 70% 80% 90% 80% 70% 70 80 90 80 70 Level of Mastery More Enough Good Very Good Good More Enough

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Name of Students
Ade Kusuma W Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N Agung Saraswati, I.A Angga Mahaputra Ariani, Ni Kadek

Score

58

6. 7. 8. 9.

Aryadi, Made Aryadinata, I.A.N Astradita Djelantik, I.MD Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

9 7 7 8 8 7 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 7 8 7 8 8 9 7 6 6 7 9

90% 70% 70% 80% 80% 70% 80% 70% 70% 70% 60% 60% 60% 70% 80% 70% 80% 80% 90% 70% 60% 60% 70% 90%

90 70 70 80 80 70 80 70 70 70 60 60 60 70 80 70 80 80 90 70 60 60 70 90

Very Good More Enough More Enough Good Good More Enough Good More Enough More Enough More Enough Enough Enough Enough More Enough Good More Enough Good Good Very Good More Enough Enough Enough More Enough Very Good

10. Destarita Rahmawati 11. Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 12. Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 14. Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 15. Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 16. Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 17. Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 18. Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 20. Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 21. Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 22. Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 23. Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 24. Nurul Laelly 25. Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 26. Prawira Aria R., I. Md 27. Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 28. Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 29. Sri Adnyasari, Putu

59

30. Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 31. Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 33. Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 34. Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 35. Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 36. Wiana Baskara, IGAN 37. Wiracana, I Made 38. Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd N = 38

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

8 7 7 7 6 8 7 7 7 X1 = 7,3

80% 70% 70% 70% 60% 80% 70% 70% 70% X2 = 73%

80 70 70 70 60 80 70 70 70 X3 = 73,0

Good More Enough More Enough More Enough Enough Good More Enough More Enough More Enough More Enough

The Result of Post-Test Session II in cycle II Total Items 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Items Answered Correctly Total 8 9 9 9 8 9 8 8 8 10 % 80% 90% 90% 90% 80% 90% 80% 80% 80% 100% 80 90 90 90 80 90 80 80 80 100 Level of Mastery Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Good Very Good Good Good Good Excellent

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Name of Students
Ade Kusuma W Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N Agung Saraswati, I.A Angga Mahaputra Ariani, Ni Kadek Aryadi, Made Aryadinata, I.A.N Astradita Djelantik, I.MD Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A

Score

10. Destarita Rahmawati

60

11. Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 12. Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 14. Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 15. Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 16. Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt 17. Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 18. Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 20. Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 21. Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 22. Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 23. Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 24. Nurul Laelly 25. Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 26. Prawira Aria R., I. Md 27. Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 28. Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 29. Sri Adnyasari, Putu 30. Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 31. Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 33. Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 34. Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 35. Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

8 9 9 7 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 10 10 10 8 8 8 8 8 9 7 7 8 8 9

80% 90% 90% 70% 80% 80% 80% 70% 80% 80% 80% 100% 100% 100% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 90% 70% 70% 80% 80% 90%

80 90 90 70 80 80 80 70 80 80 80 100 100 100 80 80 80 80 80 90 70 70 80 80 90

Good Very Good Very Good More Enough Good Good Good More Enough Good Good Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Good Good Good Good Good Very Good More Enough More Enough Good Good Very Good

61

36. Wiana Baskara, IGAN 37. Wiracana, I Made 38. Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd N = 38

10 10 10

8 8 7 X1 = 8,28

80% 80% 70% X2 = 82,8%

80 80 70 X3 = 82,8

Good Good More Enough Good

The Result of Post-Test Session III in cycle II Total Items 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Items Answered Correctly Total 9 10 10 10 9 10 9 10 9 10 9 9 9 9 9 9 % 90% 100% 100% 100% 90% 100% 90% 100% 90% 100% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90 100 100 100 90 100 90 100 90 100 90 90 90 90 90 90 Level of Mastery Very Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Very Good Excellent Very Good Excellent Very Good Excellent Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good Very Good

No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Name of Students
Ade Kusuma W Adek Herry A.N.N., G.N Agung Saraswati, I.A Angga Mahaputra Ariani, Ni Kadek Aryadi, Made Aryadinata, I.A.N Astradita Djelantik, I.MD Bintang Damayanti, I.D.A

Score

10. Destarita Rahmawati 11. Ditha Sasmita, Ni Wayan 12. Doddy Haryadi , Pande M 13. Dwi Widyantari, Made 14. Dwija Santika, I Kdk. 15. Ega. S Cahyaningrum, LG 16. Eka Sucipta Dewi, Ni Pt

62

17. Ekayana Paramardika P.IP 18. Febriantow Sukahet, IDM 19. Indah Purnamayanti, N.W 20. Indah Satya Dewi, Kmg. 21. Kusuma Yuda, I.P.G 22. Mahaindra Putra, A.A Gd 23. Meka Raini, Putu Ayu 24. Nurul Laelly 25. Nusan Ayu Kumala Sari 26. Prawira Aria R., I. Md 27. Prayuni Danamukti, I.A 28. Putra Wiguna, I.Pt. 29. Sri Adnyasari, Putu 30. Sri Rahayu, Ni Putu 31. Sri Widya Lestari, Ni Kdk 32. Surya Pradipta N., IGNA 33. Tasya Ratna E.K., Pt 34. Very Ade Andreana, Kdk 35. Wahyudi Wijaya, IGNA 36. Wiana Baskara, IGAN 37. Wiracana, I Made 38. Yoga Pustaka, I Ketut Gd N = 38

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

9 8 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 10 10 9 8 10 9 10 9 9 8 X1 = 9,28

90% 80% 80% 90% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% 90% 90% 100% 100% 100% 90% 80% 100% 90% 100% 90% 90% 80% X2 = 92,8%

90 80 80 90 90 100 100 100 100 90 90 100 100 100 90 80 100 90 100 90 90 80 X3 = 92,8

Very Good Good Good Very Good Very Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Very Good Very Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Very Good Good Excellent Very Good Excellent Very Good Very Good Good Very Good

= The total number of the students

63

X1 X2 X3

= The average scores of correct students answer = The percentage of correct students answer = The students mean score

4.1.3.4 Reflection Based on the description given above, it could be concluded that learning in the classroom ran as expected. An interest in students and their motivation had been formed and very high, So it was with the existing of test results had proven the effectiveness of the techniques and methods which was taught. In this learning, two cycles had been carried out and completed as a result of the increasing of students ability in learning verb-ing forms through combining mind mapping and association.

4.2 Discussion of Finding Researchers will discuss all the findings that was analyzed in the form of assessment of post-test results the existing in the form of summary, to explain the techniques and methods are provided to students has brought a nice change. The mean score that was gained an indication of increasing the capability, the value, and the student interest in learning English, especially the forms of verb-ing. We can see all changes and improvements from the two cycles by following this table form. The Summary of the Result Test INITIAL REFLECTION TEST / CYCLE IR Pre-Test MEAN SCORE 40 SCORE 40 LEVEL OF MASTERY Low

64

Post Test 1 CYCLE I Post Test 2 Post Test 3 Post Test 1 CYCLE II Post Test 2 Post Test 3

51,5 59,7 67,1 73 82,8 92,8 82,8 Good 59,4 Almost Enough

The result of pre-test showed that the students average scores were 40. This number was further on the conducted on the first cycle was 59,4 which showed almost enough result in term of level mastery. This improvement was further optimized after the second cycle conducted, and showed the average score 82,8 which mean the average score improvement was good. For a clear description of the students improvement, the reader can see the following graph.

1 0 0 8 0 6 0 4 0 2 0 0 Pre-T es t P ost-T es tI P ost-T est II z

65

The graph showed that score from the test in pre-test to the first cycle was increasing. Then the increase was good at second cycle. This improvement showed that the teaching and learning process were running well.

4.2.1 Questionnaire Questionnaire is a list of the answer sheet used to get detailed information about a person's opinion. To obtain a qualitative assessment of the researchers gave the questionnaire to determine the acquisition value of teaching students about the patterns that already exist. The result of questionnaire indicated that 68,5% of the students really agreed that learning verb-ing forms through combining mind mapping and association are very good and can improve their skill in learning English. And the other result of questionnaire indicated that 31,5% of the students agreed that learning verb-ing forms through combining mind mapping and association are very good and can improve their skill in learning English.