Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Andrew Brons, as many of you will know, resides in this parish and
ever since last Sunday I have been wondering about my
responsibilities as a priest ordained to this Parish of the Church of
England, where I share the cure of souls with the Bishop, Paul, Jo,
Olivia and John Duff for all who live in our parish – not just those
who enter in through our doors and join together for worship – but
all people, of all faiths and none, of all political views and none
who live within the parish boundary.
So the question I have been wrestling with this past week has
been this:
Our reading today from John’s Gospel today considers very similar
issues. One of the many questions that arise from our reading is:
How do we respond to those who would hate and persecute us for
who we are as followers of Christ ?
The word “hate” is a strong one but it is the one Jesus uses in our
passage today and in drawing a distinction between two different
2
groups, it fits with the dualistic themes that run throughout John’s
Gospel. Such as those who dwell in the dark and the light, and that
which comes from above and from below.
The World
In Johns Gospel the use of the word “the world” is less than
straightforward.
And then there are times in these farewell discourses when the
term is used negatively as in our passage today.
At one point in John 1:10 we have all three usages together in one
verse where John writes
3
“He was in the world (neutral), and the world was made through
him (positive), yet the world did not know him (negative)”.
The danger with taking such a view and using this text to do it,
ignores not only the text as a whole, but also gives birth to a
different danger – that of “othering” of giving the role of “the other”
to a group different from ourselves. It is something that political
parties have done for centuries and something that the Church has
also been complicit in, not least through the use John Gospel to
label one particular group as “others”.
Oi Oudiai
John’s Gospel also has another name for those who oppose
Christians. It is an uncomfortable label with a loaded history. And
that word or phrase in Greek is “oi oudadia” – which is translated
into English as “the Jews”.
More than any other text in the Bible, John’s Gospel has become
the source of justification for enmity between Christians and Jews.
Written when Christians were a minority being persecuted by a
Jewish majority, is has subsequently used in distortion as a text
that justifies a persecution of Jews, as people who hate Jesus,
hate the Father and who have no excuse for their sin.
22If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty
of sin. Now, however, they have no excuse for their sin. 23He who
hates me hates my Father as well. 24If I had not done among
them what no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin. But now
they have seen these miracles, and yet they have hated both me
and my Father. 25But this is to fulfil what is written in their Law:
'They hated me without reason.'
So what are we to do with out reading and the text before us. If it is
a mistake, which I believe it is, to use it as a basis for withdrawing
from the world, and also a clear distortion to use it as a basis to
attack those who reject our understanding of truth, what then is the
message of our text ?
She warned of the dangers of approaching the Bible with our own
agenda and rather asking what any passage tells us about the
nature of God and how it is that which should inform our action.
the service to arrest those there who were seen as enemies of the
state. Climbing to the pulpit Desmond Tutu made a direct appeal to
the soldiers gathered there:
“Lay down your weapons and your orders,” he said. “You see you
are on a fight you cannot win. The victory of Christ has already
been achieved. So come with us, come over to the winning side.”
Tutu spoke as one who had been identified as being on the wrong
side by the authorities but who saw his role as one of active
opposition to the forces of evil.
Not for him an abdication of the political in the belief that such
things were unspiritual. Nor for him a belief in the dichotomy
between the spiritual on one hand and the worldly on the other. As
a member of the persecuted, but more importantly as a man of
God, Tutu saw his role to be in active opposition to those who
stand in the way of the Kingdom.
“It was the winter of 1993. For months now the notorious Serbian
fighters called četnik had been sowing desolation in my native
country, herding people into concentration camps, raping women,
burning down churches, and destroying cities. In a book I had just
written I had just argued that we ought to embrace our enemies as
God has embraced us in Christ.”
Conclusion
The BNP is a virulently anti semitic party. It was born in the same
soil of fascism that gave birth to national socialism. It has no love
for non-whites of any description.
Amen.