Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
mnu
Sponsor 3/28/06
Issues u
Lead
12/1/04
11/15/04 2/1/05 3/22/05
4/30/05
3/31/05 4/15/05
n m m m
1) Strategic Plan booklet 2) Strategy Map Draft 1) Kick off meeting of technical group
Senior Leadership approves revised Strategic After Phase 3 Plan Communicate Strategic Plan and Balanced Scorecard in printed and electronic format After Phase 3
1.5
3/1/05
3) Very Basic Strategy Map 4) Gap Analysis Results and recommendations to fill out SPlan 5) Revised Strategic Plan 6) Revised Strategy Map
2.3
2.4 2.5
2.6
May require meetings and other events per the Communication Plan
DRAFT
Page 1 of 14
Project Plan
Date of Report Name Start Date Jun 30, 2005
mnu
Sponsor 3/28/06
Issues u
Lead
2.7
Centralize feedback and comments for next planning cycle. Collect and recommend for next planning session cycle.
Output from this step does not get 10) Feedback Collection acted upon until next annual planning System and Reports cycle.
3.2
3.8
4.2
DRAFT
Page 2 of 14
Project Plan
Date of Report Name Start Date Jun 30, 2005
mnu
Sponsor 3/28/06
Issues u
Lead
4.3
Identify gaps and short coming with linking and make recommendations to improve Cross walk all major initiatives against the Strategic Objectives - Pareto Chart the initiatives / projects Work back upstream from initiatives / projects not linked and document any missing lower level objectives in strategic plan and / or strategy map
4.4
4.5
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
Prototype test and revise database design of Balanced Scorecard System - (ESMS Roll out test modules at pilot sites - flush out lessons learned and update IT Plans Cascade and development plan for Enterprise Strategic Management System (ESMS)
5.6 5.7
DRAFT
Page 3 of 14
Project Plan
Date of Report Name Start Date Jun 30, 2005
mnu
Sponsor 3/28/06
Issues u
Lead
3/28/06
Status
Major Issues
Comments
3 4
DRAFT
Page 4 of 14
Definition
What is the PM number for What metric(s) should we use to referencing. Could be LMR # or measure whether we have met our a unique number for local requirements? metrics?
Is this measure a Customer, Process, Learn & Grow or Resources measure based on the BSC framework?
Insert major goals or objectives in Insert a list of the major this box as a reference in organizational unit names in completing this template this box for reference in completing this template
Insert a Link here to reference back a list of Functions / Departments and other organizational units in completing this template
Insert the Operating Area such as Product or Service Line - To be used for Product Performance Analysis
What are the data elements Where does the data for caclulating the measure? reside?
What is the actual result of this measure for the Year 2003?
1 2 3 4 5 6
5 of 14
Definition
What is the PM number for What metric(s) should we use to What is the actual referencing. Could be LMR # or measure whether we have met our result of this measure a unique number for local requirements? for the Year 2004? metrics?
Who is the primary owner for the measure and their email address?
Y/N
1 2 3 4 5 6
6 of 14
Review and score all measurements used in your scorecard model F1.1 F1.2 F1.3 F1.4 F2.1 F2.2 F2.3 F2.4 F3.1 F3.2 F3.3 F3.4 C1.1 C1.2 C1.3 C1.4 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 P1.1 P1.2 P1.3 P1.4 P2.1 P2.2 P2.3 P2.4 P3.1 P3.2 P3.3 P3.4 P4.1 P4.2 P4.3 P4.4 L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L2.1 L2.2 L2.3 % Revenue Growth
Graded Attributes
Instructions: Rate each Measurement for these attributes on a scale of 1 to 5: 1. Update Frequency: Measurement can get updated on a regular basis; M for Monthly, Q for Quarterly, A for Annual, etc. 2. Degree of Reliability: Can you easily measure the performance objective or is it too subjective when it comes to measurabili 3. Encourages the right behavior: Measurements should not confuse, distort, or create the wrong performance behavior within 4. Degree of Fit: Measurement fits with the culture and processes of Organization and flows well from Lower Level to Upper Le 5. Degree of Support: Client has existing procedures and processes that can support the measurement (such as available dat Maximum Score 25
Leading or Lagging
Total Points 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lagging
Single
NonGraded Attributes
0 0 0 0 0
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Quarterly, A for Annual, etc. ve when it comes to measurability. ong performance behavior within the Organization. Controllable? well from Lower Level to Upper Level. (MACRO FIT - ORGANIZATIONAL) surement (such as available data is in place)
Alignment Matrix
Vision
Mission
Values
Measures
Tools
Project Roster
Name Area Location Desk Phone
www.intranets.com
Cell Phone