Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PRESENTED BY:
CS NESAR AHMAD
SANKALP C-227, PARYAVARAN COMPLEX NEW DELHI-110 030 TEL: +91-11-2953 6312/ 6642 TELEFAX: +91-11-2953 6642 NESARASSOCIATES@YAHOO.COM
COPYRIGHT
The presentation is a property of Nesar & Associates. No part of it can be copied, reproduced or distributed in any manner, without explicit prior permission. In case of linking, please do give credit and full link
TOPICS OF DISCUSSION
SHAREHOLDERS DEMOCRACY
The Concept of Shareholders Democracy in the Corporate World denote the shareholders supreme authority in the governance of the business and affairs of their respective companies either directly or through their elected representatives. Its main intent is :
Establishing dialogue with the management on issues that concern a shareholder Influencing the corporate culture
Increasing general awareness on economic, environmental, social and human issues concerning the organization (shareholder activism)
COMPANIES BILL
The Companies Act, 1956 had already recognized the supreme authority of the shareholders by giving various authority to direct, control, conduct and manage the business and affairs of the Company. Now the Companies Bill, 2012 has armed the shareholders with more effective and powerful weapons so as to enable them to ensure that the business and the affairs of the Company are properly managed.
SHAREHOLDERS DEMOCRACY
Among various provisions Some of the important added weapons in the Companies Bill armory are:
SPECIAL RESOLUTION
Clause 27 provides, a Company shall not vary the terms of contract objects referred to in prospectus or objects for which it issued shall not except subject to the approval of or an authority given by the Company in general meeting by way of special resolution
Nesar & Associates, New Delhi
USE OF FUND
Proviso to Clause 27 provides, now a Company which has varied the terms of contract referred to in prospectus or objects for which it issued shall not use any amount raised by it through Prospectus for buying, trading or otherwise dealing in Equity Shares of any other Listed Company .
Nesar & Associates, New Delhi
ACCEPTANCE OF DEPOSITS
Clause 73 states that a Company cannot accept deposits from person other than its member and approval of shareholders subject to such rules as may be prescribed in consultation with the RBI will be required for the acceptance of deposits.
As per the Bill, NBFCs are not covered by the provisions relating to the acceptance of deposits and they will be governed under rules issued by the RBI.
Nesar & Associates, New Delhi
ELECTRONIC VOTING
Clause 108 encourage wider participation of shareholders at General Meetings, the Central Government may prescribe the class or classes of companies in which a member may exercise their vote at meetings by electronic means.
Clause 178(5) provides, where the combined membership of the shareholders, debenture holders, deposit holders and any other security holders is more than one thousand at any time during the financial year, the company shall constitute a Stakeholders Relationship Committee.
Clause 188 provides in case of having the prescribed paid up-capital, no Related Party Transactions will be carried without the approval of the shareholders by passing a Special Resolution.
STRINGENT PENALTY
Clause 75 made the penalty for failure to repay deposit has been made extremely stringent. Where a company fails to repay the deposit and it is proved that the deposits had been accepted with intent to defraud the depositors or for any fraudulent purpose, every officer of the company who was responsible for the acceptance of such deposit shall, without prejudice to liability under section 447 i.e. punishment for fraud), be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the losses or damages that may have been incurred by the depositors
MINORITY RIGHTS
This has always been a demand that the corporate governance framework should ensure the equitable treatment of all shareholders, including minority shareholders. All shareholders should have the opportunity to obtain effective redress for violation of their rights. Minority Shareholders gets teeth in in the Companies Bill, 2012 by way of following powerful tools :
EXIT SCHEME
The Dissenting shareholders shall be given an exit offer by the promoters or controlling shareholders at such exit price and in such manner and conditions as may be specified by the Securities and Exchange Board by making regulation in this behalf.
IMPORTANCE
Exit option is a measure to deal with investor angst over companies either suddenly entering new areas by changing the objects for which the money was raised or by a demerging profitable business.
Though it will not stop the Company from diversifying, it will allow the minority shareholder to exit in case he is unsure of the kind of business move.
CLASS ACTION
The biggest boost for the small investor comes in the form of the provision for class-action lawsuits, which can allow a group of investors with common interest in a matter to sue the management of a firm, its auditors or a section of shareholders in case of suspected wrongdoing, a option not available under the current regulations.
The concept that is common in various jurisdictions such as US, UK and Singapore did not exist in India.
The threat of class action tends to enhance sense of responsibility and diligence of the defendant towards the interest of stakeholders.
APPLICABILITY
Suit under Clause 245 may be filed by members or depositors or any class of them before the National Company Law Tribunal, if they believe that the management or conduct of the affairs of the company prejudices the interest of the company, its members or depositors.
IMPORTANCE
The importance of the provision can be gauged by the experience of the Satyam fraud. Well over three years after the scandal broke; Indian investors are yet to get any significant compensation in the 8,000-crore fraud allegedly committed by the promoters of Satyam Computer Services. But some of their counterparts in the US, who owned American Depositary Receipts, have made the company commit to pay $125 million in settlement by taking recourse to the strong class-action framework.
CLASS ACTION SUIT VIS-A VIS SUIT FOR OPPRESSION AND MISMANAGMENT
Clause 241 of the Bill deal with the filing of petition before the Company Law Board against oppression and mismanagement.
There are some difference between an oppression and mismanagement suit and a class action suit
CLASS ACTION SUIT VIS-A VIS SUIT FOR OPPRESSION AND MISMANAGMENT
1.
Depositors can file class action suits but not a suit under clause 241 of the Bill Oppression and mismanagement case can be filed against the company and its statutory appointees only, while a class suit in addition to the company and its statutory appointees can be filed against an expert or advisor or consultant or any other person for any incorrect or misleading statement to the company and also against an auditor for any improper or misleading financial statements
2.
CLASS ACTION SUIT VIS-A VIS SUIT FOR OPPRESSION AND MISMANAGMENT
3.
Petitions under clause 241 of the Bill can be filed for past mismanagement and to prevent recurrence, while class action suit can ask the management or directors of company to desist from one or more particular action that have not been taken yet.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) describes processes of settling disputes by means other than litigation (taking a case to court). ADR includes mediation & conciliation and arbitration processes.
Companies Bill 2012 introduced the provisions of mediation and Conciliation in order to get the speedy disposal without the judicial proceeding. Clause 442 provides for power, in case of any proceeding before the NCLT or the CG or NCLAT, to refer a matter to the mediation and conciliation panel
EXPERT
Clause 2 (38) of the bill deals with Definitions, defines expert as : expert includes an engineer, a valuer, a chartered accountant, a company secretary, a cost accountant and any other person who has the power or authority to issue a certificate in pursuance of any law for the time being in force
SPEEDY DISPOSAL
The Mediation and Conciliation Panel shall follow such procedure as may be prescribed and dispose of the matter referred to it within a period of three months from the date of such reference and forward its
recommendations to the Central Government or the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be
CONCLUSION
The Companies Bill 2012 by all the above powerful tools is going to change the way companies are incorporated, raise money, interact with its stakeholders, govern themselves and contribute to nation building.