Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Monthly
MONTHLY UPDATE SEPTEMBER 10, 2013
Recommendations
HCL Tech Target Price: 1,207 TCS Target Price: 1,986 Wipro Target Price: 430 Infosys Target Price: 2,581 eClerx Target Price: 1,082 Persistent Target Price: 677 Polaris Target Price: 109 BUY Upside : 19% BUY Upside : 0% SELL Upside : -8% SELL Upside : -15% BUY Upside : 31% BUY Upside : 19% SELL Upside : -7%
Analyst Details
Ankur Rudra, CFA +91 22 3043 3211 ankurrudra@ambitcapital.com Nitin Jain +91 22 3043 3291 nitinjain@ambitcapital.com
Technology
Page 2
Technology
Exhibit 2: Forward contracts dominate the hedging book of IT firms (as on June 2013)
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research estimates; Note: Wipro also uses predominantly forward contracts for hedging (the exact proportion is not reported by the company)
With the high volatility in the INR/USD rate over the last few weeks, options have become less cost-effective for the companies to hedge. On the other hand, increasing forward premiums are providing opportunities to the companies to get attractive forward rates. The increase in limits to cancel and re-book the forward contracts by exporters from 25% to 50%1 will provide a further fillip to the use of forward contracts by the companies.
Exhibit 3: Increasing forward premium makes forwards an attractive hedging tool Exhibit 4: High volatility in INR/USD leading to expansion in option premiums
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/exporters-can-re-book50-of-cancelled-forwards-rbi/articleshow/22296602.cms
September 10, 2013 AMBIT CAPITAL Pvt Ltd Page 3
Technology Among the companies under our coverage, whilst eClerx and Persistent recognise forward contracts as cash flow hedges and classify them as effective, HCL Tech, TCS and Wipro classify their hedges into designated and non-designated and also bifurcate their designated hedges into effective and non-effective. TCS and Wipro classify ~57% and ~47% of their receivable related hedges (i.e. excluding the hedges relating to the borrowings) as cash flow hedges.
Wipro and HCL Tech partly make P&L adjustment in the top-line; Infosys and TCS show the entire amount below EBITDA
The accounting methods for the hedging-related gains/losses in the P&L account are notably different across firms. Companies such as TCS, Infosys, Persistent Systems, eClerx and Polaris show the hedging gains/losses as a part of other income. On the other hand, HCL Tech and Wipro account for gain/loss on completion of the effective cash flow contracts as a part of revenues. Although both the methods are legitimate from an accounting point of view, it creates inconsistency during margin comparison among peers. The EBIT/EBITDA margins are overstated in case of hedging gain and understated in case of hedging losses under the methods followed by HCL Tech and Wipro. The hypothetical analysis in Exhibit 5 illustrates this point.
Exhibit 5: Margin impact analysis under methods of accounting hedging losses in P&L (Rs mn)
Base case (cash flow hedging gains/losses booked as other income) 10,000 2,000 20% 100 Cash flow hedging Cash flow hedging loss gain of 100 adjusted of 100 adjusted in revenues in revenues 10,100 9,900 2,100 1,900 21% 19%
exception). Companies are opting to remain at the lower end of the board-approved hedging cover range (hedging implies the forward 12-month revenue covered by hedging). High premiums are making options unattractive; companies are increasingly using forward contracts.
The change in hedging strategies is evident from eClerxs and HCL Techs reported metrics. eClerx has increased its hedging exposure both in duration as well as quantum (eClerx increased the amount of its hedge book from ~65% of TTM revenues in FY13 to 81% in 1QFY14). Further, it increased the proportion of longterm hedges (>1 year duration) from 23% in March 2013 to 33% in June 2013. The strategy adopted by eClerx is somewhat contrary to the views heard from other company managements. HCL Tech, on the other hand, has increased the proportion
Page 4
Technology of forward contracts in its hedge book. Exhibits 6 to 11 below display the changing trends in hedging strategies.
Exhibit 6: TCS Stable hedging trends; not much movement in use of forwards and hedging coverage Exhibit 7: Infosys slight uptick in use of longer-term hedging contracts
Exhibit 8: Wipro Slight decline in hedging coverage; management indicates no change in strategy
Exhibit 9: HCL Tech growing percentage of forward contracts hedge book; slight increase in long-term hedges
Exhibit 10: Persistent Systems Some uptick in hedging coverage; management indicates no change in strategy
Exhibit 11: eClerx Increasing hedge coverage; hedging continues to be driven by forward contracts
Page 5
Technology
Average hedging rates at ~Rs59 levels; may lead to deterioration in cash conversion
Among the companies that share the hedge booking rate data (HCL Tech, Persistent Systems and eClerx), we observe that the average booking rate has been ~Rs59. Given the significant depreciation in INR over the last one month, the average exchange rate for the quarter could be ~Rs63 (assuming INR stays at the current levels for the rest of the quarter). Given that the hedges expiring during the September 2013 quarter would have been below the average Rs59 level, this would imply lower realisation. As revenues and expenses (and hence EBITDA) would be converted at the average exchange rate of ~Rs63 whilst realisation would be lower due to lower hedge booking rates, the cash conversion (CFO/EBITDA) might come under pressure in 2QFY14. Furthermore, the 11.5% depreciation in INR since the end of the last quarter would imply MTM hedging losses. The quantification of the hedging losses is not possible as the granular details on cash flow - effective and non-effective and non-designated hedges - are not shared by the companies, which makes it difficult to determine the extent of the impact on the P&L and balance sheet. Further, these hedging losses/gains would be offset to some extent by revaluation in net monetary assets.
Page 6
Technology
managements estimates, ~40% of HCL Techs revenues in this service line are non-linear (i.e. de-linked from headcount), largely reflecting the higher proportion of managed service deals and industrialisation initiatives by the management. RIM accounts for ~31.5% of HCL Techs consolidated revenues. proportion of blue-printing and implementation business in EAS, lower proportion of BPO in the business mix and the least exposure to lower-realisation emerging geographies are the additional factors contributing to better-than-peer employee productivity.
Page 7
Technology This largely reflects significantly higher employee productivity in the RIM business, arising from a higher non-linear component (which is also reflected in the higher proportion of fixed-price contracts) as indicated by the management and low presence in emerging geographies. Note that HCL Tech has the highest effort mix of Core software services (excluding EAS) among the tier-1 firms (see Exhibit 20). Its significantly better-than-peer employee productivity in Core Software Services (excluding EAS) has a positive effect on overall business employee productivity.
Exhibit 13: Revenue productivity adjusted for onsite revenues (adjusted for subcontractors and utilisation) Exhibit 14: Revenue productivity adjusted for EAS (adjusted for subcontractors and utilisation)
Exhibit 15: Revenue productivity adjusted for BPO (adjusted for subcontractors and utilisation)
Exhibit 16: Revenue productivity adjusted for EAS and BPO (adjusted for subcontractors and utilisation)
Page 8
Technology
Exhibit 17: HCL Tech has the lowest presence in Emerging geographies
Exhibit 18: HCL Tech has the highest proportion of fixedprice contracts in the revenue mix
Exhibit 19: HCL Techs EAS employee productivity is the best the industry thanks to higher proportion of Blue-printing and Implementation work
Exhibit 20: HCL Tech has the highest proportion of efforts in its Core Software Services business (excl EAS), where it enjoys higher productivity led by the RIM business
Exhibit 21: Despite lower EBIT margins, HCL Techs per employee productivity is the bes industry, thanks to best-in-class employee productivity
For the quarter-ending June EBIT margin EBIT per billed employee EBIT per technical employee Source: Company, Ambit Capital research TCS 27.0% 17,222 12,592 Infosys 23.6% 17,329 12,438 Wipro 20.0% 13,360 8,657 HCL Tech 21.0% 16,245 13,422
Page 9
Technology
For all the companies except HCL Tech and Wipro, we assume Onsite revenue
mix in the EAS business to be the same as the reported number for the overall business. For HCL Tech, we have assumed onsite:offshore revenue mix of 75:25 and for Wipro we assume 65:35. 2.1x for Infosys and Wipro and 2.6x for HCL Tech.
Page 10
Technology
NA NA NA 109 NA NA 97%
NA NA NA 103 NA NA 7%
NA NA NA 101 NA NA 57%
NA NA NA 98 NA NA 74%
NA NA NA 90 NA NA 97%
NA NA NA 82 NA NA 15%
NA NA NA 82 NA NA 70%
NA NA NA 82 NA NA 53%
39 849 89 93 NA NA 105%
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research; Note: * Our estimates, # Company estimates
Page 11
Technology
Exhibit 23: Cash conversion trend (CFO/EBITDA) HCL Tech vs peers
Jun10 Sep10 Dec10 Mar11 Jun11 Sep11 Dec11 Mar12 Jun12 Sep12 Dec12 Mar13 Jun13 TCS Cognizant Infosys Wipro Average HCL Tech HCL Tech (Adjusted) 45% 59% 79% 57% 60% 97% NA 61% 92% 68% 57% 70% 7% NA 82% 144% 69% 37% 83% 57% NA 56% 16% 50% 96% 54% 74% NA 52% 72% 78% 23% 56% 97% NA 41% 102% 84% 45% 68% 15% NA 50% 84% 73% 58% 66% 70% NA 61% 29% 69% 99% 65% 53% NA 59% 88% 72% 60% 70% 105% NA 63% 97% 86% 89% 84% 28% 23% 76% 91% 89% 101% 89% 96% 91% 73% 17% 82% 93% 66% 66% 62% 78% 80% 65% 117% 109% QoQ YoY 42% -3,151 -1,794 6,087 -1,017 -175 -144 5,050 4,690 781 25 -501 1,221 NA
60% -3,339
Exhibit 24: Current liability days comparison for quarter-ending June 2013
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research * Adjusted for derivative financial instruments
That said, HCL Tech's current liabilities have been significantly above the peer average in the last two years (see Exhibits 25 and 26 below). This has contributed significantly to the CFO (e.g. increase in current liabilities contributed US$206mn to the CFO of US$834mn in FY13 and US$241mn contribution to the CFO of US$509mn in FY12).
Exhibit 25: Current liabilities (excluding borrowings and financial instruments) including short-term provisions (in days)
FY11 TCS Infosys Wipro Average HCL Tech* 72 74 105 84 86 FY12 67 73 97 79 96 FY13 67 78 105 83 NA TCS Infosys Wipro Average HCL Tech*
Exhibit 26: Current liabilities (excluding borrowings and financial instruments) (in days)
FY11 60 49 80 63 68 FY12 55 46 76 59 77 FY13 57 50 80 62 NA
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research; Note: * Year-ending June for HCL Tech
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research; Note: * Year-ending June for HCL Tech
The below factors explain HCL Techs structurally high current liabilities relative to its peers:
Bonus accruals in 4Q: HCL Tech creates accrued liability for Long Term
Incentive Plans (LTIPs) and bonuses over 3Q-4Q (quarter-ending June) and pays it over 1Q and 2Q every year. According to the FY12 Annual Report, this is a significant amount and was equivalent to 9.5/10.5 working capital days (2.6%/2.8% of revenues) in FY11/12. Among the tier-1 peers, whilst Infosys and Wipro have some element of bonus accruals in the quarterly balance sheet (not quantifiable due to absence of information), TCS does not have any balance
AMBIT CAPITAL Pvt Ltd Page 12
Technology sheet bonus accruals. A direct comparison is not possible due to information asymmetry.
Unfunded gratuity plan: HCL Tech does not have a funded gratuity plan and it
manages the gratuity obligation on its own. This is booked as a part of short-term and long-term provisions. All of HCL Techs tier-1 peers have well-funded gratuity plans, implying a relatively lower amount in the current liabilities and provisions. them for the Infrastructure (RIM) business. Indeed, over 40% of the outsourcing costs (which in turn constitute ~12% of revenues) are non-manpower related. This is also one of the reasons for higher accrued expenses (accrued expenses constitute nearly one-third of HCL Tech's total operating current liabilities) as compared to its peers.
Higher outsourcing costs: HCL Tech does not own the data centres but leases
phase: HCL Tech has largely relied on hunting-led growth over the past several quarters (also highlighted in our July issue of Technology Monthly Changing engines of growth). This also reflects in the comparatively lower revenues from the repeat business. The higher proportion of new client additions implies larger proportion of projects under the transition phase. According to the management, many times, the transition phase involves certain advance payments from the client.
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research; Note: * Comprising TCS, Cognizant, Infosys, Wipro and HCL Tech
Source: Company, Ambit Capital research Note: * Comprising TCS, Cognizant, Infosys, Wipro and HCL Tech
Page 13
Technology
Exhibit 30: HCL Techs revenue from repeat business is lower than the tier-1 peers
Operating leases: HCL Tech has some operating leases that inflated its FY13
current liabilities by US$20mn due to lease equalisation. However, this should not impact the CFO since it is a non-cash item and hence effectively is CFOneutral. We do not know the absolute amount in FY12 and FY13 (not mentioned in the FY12 annual report).
Exhibit 31: HCL Techs current liabilities and provisions break-up (Rs mn)
FY11 Trade payable % of operating current liabilities and provisions Advance from customers and income received in advance % of operating current liabilities and provisions Employee benefit accruals % of operating current liabilities and provisions Accrued expenses % of operating current liabilities and provisions Taxes payable % of operating current liabilities and provisions Short-term provisions - For employee benefits % of operating current liabilities and provisions - For taxes % of operating current liabilities and provisions Long-term provisions - For employee benefits % of operating current liabilities and provisions Total operating current liabilities and provisions % of revenues Source: Company, Ambit Capital research 1,442 4% 32,628 21% 2,879 6% 49,311 24% 2,347 7% 4,282 13% 2,882 6% 7,269 15% 2,770 8% 5,540 17% 6,182 19% 8,237 25% 1,829 6% FY12 4,694 10% 7,515 15% 9,501 19% 12,256 25% 2,315 5%
Page 14
Technology
Source: Bloomberg, Ambit Capital research; Note: * Assuming exchange rates remain at the current levels for the rest of the year.
Page 15
Technology
Market watch
Exhibit 36: Recent deal announcements
Company TCS HCL Tech Wipro TCS Wipro Deal announcement Client date 04/09/2013CTM, Macau 04/09/2013Direct Energy 03/09/2013Deutsche Bank 03/09/2013DNB Group US-based healthcare 29/08/2013 service company Vertical Telecom Energy and Utilities Financial Services Financial Services Healthcare Deal details It is a multi-year, multi-million-dollar IT and business transformation project, wherein TCS will provide a new convergent rating and billing system. It is an outcome-based deal, wherein HCL Tech will implement and manage Direct Energy's residential billing and customer care operations in the Alberta market. It will provide Infrastructure hosting, Application Management and Business Process Services. According to media articles, this is a five-year ~US$125mn contract to provide Application Maintenance services with elements of Application Development. It is a six-year Managed Services contract to provide Application Maintenance and Development services. It is a ~US$100mn Infrastructure Management contract involving consolidation of clients' multiple data centres.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-08-27/software-services/41495763_1_traditionalautomation-tools-ipsoft-worldwide-indian-american-chetan-dube
Page 16
Technology Wipro partners with US firm Kana Software (September 07, 2013) With this partnership, Wipro will provide customer service solutions to its global insurers through a joint development centre. Kana provides customer service solutions using a cloud computing (on-demand) network. Polaris Company Secretary, B Muthusubramanian, resigns (September 02, 2013)
Page 17
Technology
Price performance
With continued news flow on improving demand sentiments in the US and sharp depreciation in INR against USD, IT services firms have materially outperformed the Sensex. Indeed, many of these firms are trading close to their 52-week highs. NIIT Tech and Polaris were the highest gainers in the last two weeks. After a strong run post the merger completion, Tech Mahindras share price declined by 1.4% in the last two weeks.
Exhibit 37: Share price performance
Company Sensex TCS Infosys Wipro HCL Tech Tech Mahindra Mphasis Hexaware Mindtree eClerx KPIT Persistent Polaris NIIT Tech Source: Bloomberg 5 Days chg 3.49% -2.18% -2.47% -3.12% -2.26% -1.07% -0.78% -2.42% -0.53% -0.91% 1.17% -3.24% -1.22% 3.81% 2 week chg 3.84% 7.97% -0.05% 2.05% 7.67% -1.40% 4.24% -2.46% 2.47% 4.82% 0.68% -0.60% 11.53% 13.36% 1 month chg 2.87% 6.35% 1.40% 3.81% 7.68% 10.29% 4.94% 5.26% 5.62% 7.29% 0.91% 10.77% -1.27% 18.28% 3 month chg -1.28% 35.22% 24.67% 41.97% 36.02% 47.06% -8.67% 51.88% 24.80% 19.23% 14.59% 7.83% -2.17% 12.23% 6 month chg 0.09% 27.39% 1.98% 18.87% 34.46% 26.00% 5.15% 43.27% 17.86% 30.87% 26.65% 0.47% -2.62% 7.27% 1 year change 11.09% 44.58% 25.06% 39.17% 78.87% 62.29% 8.31% -2.87% 47.57% 4.80% 3.05% 44.44% -3.58% 1.58% YTD chg -0.81% 58.36% 30.64% 33.15% 64.37% 45.92% 8.61% 46.89% 51.02% 20.47% 20.42% 10.95% 2.50% 20.80%
Exhibit 38: Share price performance over the last two weeks
Source: Bloomberg
Page 18
Technology
Relative valuation
At a consensus EPS CAGR of 13% over CY12-14E, HCL Tech looks attractive at the current CY13 P/E multiple of 12.1x among the tier-1 firms (at a ~20% discount to laggards, Wipro and Infosys), whilst TCS looks fairly valued. HCL Tech currently trades close to its five-year average forward P/E and EV/EBITDA multiple. Given the consistent margin and revenue performance and improving RoEs over the past few quarters, we expect potential upward re-pricing of shares. After a strong set of results and an optimistic guidance (after a prolonged underperformance), Wipro trades at a 16% premium to its five-year average forward P/E multiple whilst Infosys trades at a slight premium to its five-year average forward EV/NOPAT multiples. Among tier-2 stocks, high-quality names such as Persistent Systems and eClerx are trading close to their five-year average valuation multiples, whilst stocks such as Polaris (due to lack of traction in business and uncertainty over business structure) and Mphasis (due to lack of visibility in HP business) are trading at a significant discount to their historical average valuation multiples. Indeed, Persistent Systems is currently trading close to its lowest valuation multiples over the last five years. We remain strong BUYers on HCL Tech (19% upside) among the tier-1 firms and eClerx (32% upside) and Persistent Systems (19% upside) among the tier-2 firms.
Exhibit 39: Premium to five-year forward P/E Exhibit 40: Premium to five-year forward EV/NOPAT
Page 19
Technology
Exhibit 41: Forward P/E multiples relative to five-year average, high and low
Exhibit 42: Forward EV/EBITDA multiples to five-year average, high and low
Page 20
xxx
184 74 22 76 24 44 51
EUR USD
57 74
4,901 3,090
01 January 2013
Page 21
Technology
Exhibit 44: Ambit valuation summary
Infosys Price Recommendation Price target Upside/Downside Market Cap (US$ mn) ADVT - 3 months (US$ mn) EPS (Rs) FY13 FY14E FY15E EPS CAGR PE (x) FY14E FY15E EV/EBITDA (x) FY14E FY15E EV/NOPAT (x) FY14E FY15E ROE FY14E FY15E Source: Ambit Capital research, Company 25% 23% 47% 43% 25% 22% 37% 29% 17% 13% 22% 20% 57% 41% 16% 17% 19% 23% 16.91 16.72 19.84 18.15 15.18 14.15 6.28 6.11 9.97 11.83 8.83 8.17 8.21 8.97 9.88 8.29 31.87 21.80 10.95 10.75 13.02 11.77 10.09 9.30 7.05 6.80 2.71 3.06 1.05 0.97 5.20 5.54 6.67 5.54 19.99 14.20 15.52 14.75 17.01 14.93 13.86 12.54 10.19 9.65 3.92 4.50 9.12 8.23 7.93 8.67 7.42 5.71 27.06 19.28 165 191 201 10% 71 101 115 27% 25 32 35 19% 56 87 92 28% 20 26 23 6% 46 61 68 21% 57 96 88 24% 8 8 10 11% 8 11 16 38% 3,021 SELL 2,582 -15% 26,661 49.0 TCS 1,980 BUY 1,986 0% 59,665 39.5 Wipro 468 SELL 430 -8% 17,700 14.6 HCL 1,013 BUY 1,209 19% 10,866 17.6 Polaris Persistent 117 SELL 109 -7% 179 1.9 570 BUY 677 19% 348 0.3 eClerx Redington 826 BUY 1,082 31% 381 0.3 57 BUY 81 42% 350 0.3 InfoEdge 295 BUY 396 34% 493 0.7
Page 22
Technology
(022) 30433174
saurabhmukherjea@ambitcapital.com
Industry Sectors Banking / NBFCs Cement / Infrastructure Technology / Telecom / Media Automobile Power / Capital Goods Oil & Gas Strategy / Derivatives Research Strategy Banking E&C / Infrastructure / Cement Technology NBFCs Real Estate / Retail Metals & Mining Consumer / Real Estate Banking / NBFCs Economy / Strategy Healthcare Consumer E&C / Infrastructure Telecom / Media
Desk-Phone (022) 30433239 (022) 30433178 (022) 30433211 (022) 30433285 (022) 30433252 (022) 30433202 (022) 30433255 (022) 30433251 (022) 30433205 (022) 30433241 (022) 30433291 (022) 30433206 (022) 30433264 (022) 30433223 (022) 30433201 (022) 30433181 (022) 30433175 (022) 30433292 (022) 30433246 (022) 30433203 (022) 30433209
E-mail aadeshmehta@ambitcapital.com achintbhagat@ambitcapital.com ankurrudra@ambitcapital.com ashvinshetty@ambitcapital.com bhargavbuddhadev@ambitcapital.com dayanandmittal@ambitcapital.com gauravmehta@ambitcapital.com karankhanna@ambitcapital.com vkrishnan@ambitcapital.com nitinbhasin@ambitcapital.com nitinjain@ambitcapital.com pankajagarwal@ambitcapital.com pratiksinghania@ambitcapital.com paritaashar@ambitcapital.com rakshitranjan@ambitcapital.com ravisingh@ambitcapital.com ritikamankar@ambitcapital.com ritumodi@ambitcapital.com shariqmerchant@ambitcapital.com tanujmukhija@ambitcapital.com utsavmehta@ambitcapital.com
Regions India / Asia India / Asia India / USA USA / Europe USA India / Asia UK
Desk-Phone (022) 30433295 (022) 30433289 (022) 30433053 (022) 30433259 (022) 30433169 (022) 30433268 +44 (0) 20 7614 8374
Production Editor
sajidmerchant@ambitcapital.com
joelpereira@ambitcapital.com
Page 23
Expected return (over 12-month period from date of initial rating) >5% <5%
Copyright 2013 AMBIT Capital Private Limited. All rights reserved. Ambit Capital Pvt. Ltd. Ambit House, 3rd Floor 449, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai 400 013, India. Phone: +91-22-3043 3000
Page 24