www.emhr.

net
Bibliography: Decision-making Capacity, Assent, and Surrogate Permission Allen, J. (2001). Protecting human subjects. Research intermediaries: Position created to protect vulnerable people who might not have capacity to consent. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research. Aller, R. & Aller, G. (1997). An institutional response to patient/family complaints. In A. E. Shamoo (Ed.), Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects: The Baltimore Conference on Ethics (pp. 155-174). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers. Alzheimer's Association. (2004). Research consent for cognitively impaired adults: Recommendations for institutional review boards and investigators. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 18(3), 171-175. American Geriatrics Society Ethics Committee. (1998). Informed consent for research on human subjects with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46(10), 1308-1310. Annas, G. J. & Glantz, L. H. (1997). Informed consent to research on institutionalized mentally disabled persons: The dual problems of incapacity and voluntariness. In A. E. Shamoo (Ed.), Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects: The Baltimore Conference on Ethics (pp. 55-80). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers. Appelbaum, P. S., Lidz, C. W., et al. (1987). Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice. New York: Oxford University Press. Appelbaum, P. S. (1996). Patients' competence to consent to neurobiological research. Accountability in Research, 4(3-4), 241-251. Appelbaum, P. S. (1997). Patients' competence to consent to neurobiological research. In A. E. Shamoo (Ed.), Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects: The Baltimore Conference on Ethics (pp. 253-264). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers.253-264. Appelbaum, P. S., Dresser, R., et al. (1999). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decision making capacity. Rockville: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 78. Benson, P. R., Roth, L. H., et al. (1985). Informed consent In psychiatric research: Preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation. Social Science Medicine, 20(12), 1331-1341. Benson, P. R., Roth, L. H., et al. (1988). Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research. Law and Human Behavior, 12(4), 455-475. Berg, J. W. & P. S. Appelbaum. (1999). Subjects' capacity to consent to neurobiological research. In H. A. Pincus, J. A. Lieberman, and S. Ferris (Eds.), Ethics in psychiatric research: A resource manual for human subjects protection (pp. 81-106). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Decision-making Capacity, Assent, and Surrogate Permission 2 www.emhr.net

Berghmans, R. L. P. (1998). Advance Directives for non therapeutic dementia research: Some ethical and policy considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 24(1), 32-37. Bonnie, R. J. (1997). Research with cognitively impaired subjects: Unfinished business in the regulation of human research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(2), 105-111. Brod, M. S. & Feinbloom, R. I. (1990). Feasibility and efficacy of verbal consents. Research on Aging, 12(3), 364-372. Brody, J. L., Gluck, J. P., et al. (1997). Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: Informed consent. Ethics & Behavior, 7(4), 285-298. Brody, B. A. (2001). Making informed consent meaningful. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 23(5), 15. Candilis, P. J., Wesley, R. W., et al. (1993). A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 15(6), 1-4. Candilis, P. (1999). Assessing competence in critical care: Depression, denial, and the religious exception. In J. P. Orlowski (Ed.), Ethics in Critical Care Medicine (pp. 395-422). Hagerstown, MD: University Publishing Group. Cipriano, S. M. & Sorrell, J. M. (1988). Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: A review of empirical research. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 10(1), 15. Dorn, L. D., Susman, E. J., et al. (1995). Informed consent in children and adolescents: Age, maturation, and psychological state. Journal of Adolescent Health, 16(3), 185-190. Dresser, R. (1996). Mentally disabled research subjects: The enduring policy issues. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(1), 67-72. Fisher, C. B. (2002). Respecting and protecting mentally impaired persons in medical research. Ethics & Behavior, 12(3), 280-283. Fisher, C. B. (2003). Goodness-of-fit ethic for informed consent to research involving adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 27-31. Freedman, R. I. (2001). Ethical challenges in the conduct of research involving persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 39(2), 130-141. Friman, P. C. (1995). Take away their hammer: Logical and ethical problems in Range and Cotton's Reports of assent and permission in research with children: Illustrations and suggestions. Ethics & Behavior, 5(4), 349-353. Geiselmann, B. (1994). Demented subjects' competence to consent to participate in field studies: The berlin ageing study. Medicine and Law, 13(1-2), 177-184.

Decision-making Capacity, Assent, and Surrogate Permission 3 www.emhr.net

Grisso, T. (1992). Minors' assent to behavioral research without parental consent. In B. Stanley and J. E. Sieber (Eds.) Social research on children and adolescents: Ethical issues (pp.109-127). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Grisso, T. & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York: Oxford University Press. Grossman, L. & Summers, F. (1980). A study of the capacity of schizophrenic patients to give informed consent. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 31(3), 205-206. Hughes, T. & Helling, M. K.. (1991). A case for obtaining informed consent from young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 225-232. Kapp, M. B. (1983). Children's assent for participation in pediatric research protocols. Clinical Pediatrics, 22(4), 275-278. Kim, S., Appelbaum, P., Jeste, D., & Olin, J. (2004). Proxy and surrogate consent in geriatric neuropsychiatric research: Update and recommendations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(5), 797-806. Kuther, T. L. (1999). Competency to provide informed consent in older adulthood. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 20(1), 15-30. Maloney, D. M. (1996). Good Friend can sign informed consent forms. Human Research Report, 11(10), 3. Mammel, K. A. & Kaplan, D. W. (1995). Research consent by adolescent minors and Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17(5), 323-330. McCrady, B. S. & Bux, D. A. (1999). Ethical issues in informed consent with substance abusers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 186-193. McKenzie, D. (2002). What theological understandings contribute to protecting mentally impaired persons in medical treatment and research. Ethics & Behavior, 12(3), 287-290. Miller, V. A., Drotar, D., & Kodish, E. (2004). Children's competence for assent and consent: A review of empirical findings. Ethics & Behavior, 14(3), 255-295. Moser, D. J., Arndt, S., Kanz, J. E., Benjamin, M., Bayless, J. D., Reese, R. L., et al. (2004). Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 45, 1-9. Nannis, E. D. (1991). Children's understanding of their participation in psychological research: Implications for issues of assent and consent. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 23(2), 133-141. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1999). Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decision making capacity. Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). Research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: Report and recommendations. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

Decision-making Capacity, Assent, and Surrogate Permission 4 www.emhr.net

National Institutes of Health. (1999). Interim-research involving individuals with questionable capacity to consent: Points to consider. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 1014-1016. Orel, N. A. (1998). Ethical considerations in assessing the competency of older adults: A provision of informed consent. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 20(3), 189-201. Petersen, A. C. & Leffert, N. (1995). Developmental issues influencing guidelines for adolescent health research: A review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17(5), 298-305. Posever, T. A. & Chelmow, T. (2001). Informed consent for research in schizophrenia: An alternative for special studies. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 23(1), 10-15. Poythress, N. G. (2002). Obtaining informed consent for research: A model for use with participants who are mentally ill. Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 30(3), 367-374. Range, L. M. & Cotton, C. R. (1995). Reports of assent and permission in research with children: Illustrations and suggestions. Ethics & Behavior, 5(1), 49-66. Range, L. M. & Cotton, C. R. (1995). Assent and permission rejoinder. Ethics & Behavior, 5(4), 345347. Roberts, L. W. (2004). Influence of ethical safeguards on research participation: Comparison of perspectives of people with schizophrenia and psychiatrists. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(12), 2309-2311. Rosenfeld, B. (2002). Competence to consent to research: Where psychology, ethics, and the law intersect. Ethics and Behavior, 12(3), 284-287. Stiles, P. G., Poythress, N. G., et al. (2001). Improving understanding of research concept disclosures among persons with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52(6), 780-785. Sunderland, T. & Dukoff, R. (1997). Informed consent with cognitively impaired patients: An NIMH perspective on the durable power of attorney. In A. E. Shamoo (Ed.) Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects: The Baltimore Conference on Ethics (pp. 229-238). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers. Sunderland, T. & Dukoff, R. (1999). Surrogate decision making and advance directives with cognitively impaired research subjects. In H. A. Pincus, J. A. Lieberman, and S. Ferris (Eds.), Ethics in psychiatric research: A resource manual for human subjects protection (pp. 107119). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Tancredi, L. R. (1982). Competency for informed consent: Conceptual limits of empirical data. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 51-63. Thomasma, D. C. (1996). A communal model for presumed consent for research on the neurologically vulnerable. Accountability in Research, 4(3-4), 227-239. Titus, S. L. & Keane, M. A. (1996). Do you understand?: An ethical assessment of researchers' description of the consenting process. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 7(1), 60-68. Walker, M. U. (2002). Autonomy, beneficence, and justice in the wider context. Ethics & Behavior, 12(3), 291-293.

Decision-making Capacity, Assent, and Surrogate Permission 5 www.emhr.net

Wirshing, D. A., Sergi, M. J., & Mintz, J. (2005). A videotape intervention to enhance the informed consent process for medical and psychiatric treatment research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(1), 186-188.