Applying The Observation Problem to Politics

When applying the observation problem theory to a larger whole like a whole nation, we nd that the current political paradigm/theory/model, within a non reective but reexive state of mind, keeps us (nations and the world) stuck in mutually exclusive binaries as social justice (social/ liberal/left) versus freedom (capital/right). Due to this, it is the political thought & system itself, which keeps individuals, groups and nations stuck in too high polarity (dis-ease). Within this non-fragmented or eld view (this approach grasps/innerstands from), the nation is like energy. On the top we have diversity (problems/ conicts.... dissonance) and below a unied eld consisting of + and -. The deeper level is making the diversity. So the deeper imbalance is what surfaces as crime, conicts, chronic sicknesses etc. Individually we see deeper eld imbalance manifesting as aggression/crime, (sexual) abuse, corruption etc etc. Collectively all socio-economic malaise is also based on deeper disharmony, tension and conict. The current model and resultant political agenda is based on sustaining the + and the -. It is endemic to a reexive and not reective stance to things. This is what is sustaining the underlying dis-ease. This is not being changed within the current political paradigm. We see this globally where war is used to prevent war. So the concern emerging from this form of eld (reective) analysis is that the current political paradigm generates at a deeper level, the very dis-ease which generates the very problems (problems) it (than) purports to alleviate. This is very much in keeping with the ndings of mental incontinence at the individual level, namely that persons for instance in relationships (and in themselves) don't see how it is they themselves who tacitly generate the very dis-ease and problems they set out to try to solve. The nation is one big individual. This is the same reexive approach we nd all over in the west. in medicine we combat the symptoms, but never the underlying dis-ease which is at a deeper level what generates the symptoms. We think attacking symptoms and each other will remove the symptoms while it just makes it worse and helps the system decay to very dense levels. Nations have all over the west adopted this binary bi-partisan system (with some variations which boil down to the same model). But this paradigm makes nations go to war with itself (long after elections are over) and globally the whole world is at odds with itself. We prefer to invest billions in arms than to feed the third world poor countries. And once a system is very divided it becomes very easy for globalist forces to from behind the scenes take control and puppeteer. It is of dire importance that the different parties create union within and between each other which is the only immune system against intrusions of malign external forces. The level of tension (stress) in the system determines the strength of the immune system for protecting the system from within and without against intrusions. Many have shown how this model has set the US off at odds with itself... and its own best interest, and other nations seem to be following suit.

Visit dimitrihalleycenter.com