Current Sociology

http://csi.sagepub.com/ From indignation to occupation: A new wave of global mobilization

Benjamn Tejerina, Ignacia Perugorra, Tova Benski and Lauren Langman Current Sociology 2013 61: 377 originally published online 17 April 2013 DOI: 10.1177/0011392113479738 The online version of this article can be found at: http://csi.sagepub.com/content/61/4/377

Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com

On behalf of:

International Sociological Association

Additional services and information for Current Sociology can be found at: Email Alerts: http://csi.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://csi.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

>> Version of Record - Jun 10, 2013 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Apr 17, 2013 What is This?

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

479738
2013

CSI61410.1177/0011392113479738Current SociologyTejerina et al.

Article

CS

From indignation to occupation: A new wave of global mobilization

Benjamn Tejerina

Current Sociology 61(4) 377392 The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0011392113479738 csi.sagepub.com

University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Spain

Ignacia Perugorra
Rutgers University, USA

Tova Benski

The College of Management-Academic Studies, Israel

Lauren Langman
Loyola University, USA

Abstract The present monograph issue focuses on the 20112012 global wave of protests that began in Tunisia in 2011. This introductory article notes that two streams of mobilization can be distinguished in terms of the specific grievances they express, and the socioeconomic and political contexts in which they have emerged. The article argues, however, that despite these differences both threads find their antecedents in the increasing and widespread social and economic levels of inequality, which requires social movements theories to bring political economy back in the analysis of mobilization. It is further argued that the various occupy movements that have emerged since 2011 constitute diverse manifestations of a new international cycle of contention. With its innovative and distinctive traits in terms of diffusion, coordination, action repertoires, frames, and types of activism, this new cycle seeks to both transform the economic system to provide greater equality, opportunities, and personal fulfillment and, simultaneously, to democratize power in more participatory ways.
Corresponding author: Ignacia Perugorra, Department of Sociology, Rutgers University, 26 Nichol Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901-2882, USA. Email: ignacia.perugorria@fulbrightmail.org

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

378

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

Keywords Arab Spring, cycles of contention, democratization, indignados, occupy social movements, socioeconomic inequality

Introduction
Little more than two years have passed since the Tunisian uprisings, the spark that ignited a series of mobilizations of the indignant that spread like wildfire around the world. On 4 January 2011, Mohamed Bouazizi, a recent Tunisian college graduate who had become a fruit peddler in order to survive, set himself on fire out of complete desperation when he was hassled by the police for a bribe. Given the longstanding and widespread discontent with the deplorable socioeconomic situation in Tunisia, and the indifference of the countrys political elites, this act unleashed massive protests against the government, and President Ben Ali was soon forced out of office. The events in Tunisia acted as a trigger, a model and an inspiration, and mobilizations and protests quickly spread to other countries in the Middle East. The largest and perhaps most important of these demonstrations took place in Egypt, where hundreds of thousands of protesters gathered in Tahrir Square to demand the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak. After weeks of confrontations with both authorities and pro-Mubarak forces that often became violent, Mubarak was also forced to flee. A wave of democratization was afoot in the Arab world, and the phenomenon was soon labeled the Arab Spring. The movement that began in Tunisia and inspired other Arab countries became a paradigm of contentious politics that would soon influence the Southern European and American so-called mobilizations of the indignant. During the spring of 2011 countries like Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Greece were facing extreme economic dislocations and hardships in the wake of the implosion of the United States financial system that subsequently led to the euro crisis. Within a relatively short time, a number of similar social movements emerged and, accordingly, there were actions, demonstrations, and, most visibly, what became the protesters favorite tactic: the occupation of public space. The widespread use of this tactic in the Middle East, Europe and, lastly, in the United States has inspired both our term occupy social movements, to which we refer below, and the title of this monograph issue. We chose this term over the more widespread indignant mobilizations or networks of outrage and hope (see e.g. Castells, 2012) for three reasons. First, outrage was indeed the emotion that ignited these mobilizations; we argue, however, that it was not the sole, and perhaps not even the most decisive emotion at play in this cycle of contention. Second, social movements emerge to modify a situation defined as problematic, and it is usually their goals, visions, strategies, and tactics, and not the emotions that trigger them, that make them what they are, and distinguish them from others. Third, occupying space usually is charged with the symbolic power of invading sites of state power, or financial institutions (Castells, 2012: 1011). Since 2011, many observers have reported on these unprecedented global protests. They have noted how people felt marginalized if not scapegoated by various

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

Tejerina et al.

379

combinations of socioeconomic crises that led to the stagnation or steep decline in the standards of living of many. Moreover, they have borne witness to the distress of several others whose lives were becoming more and more precarious and who were being excluded from normal ways of living associated with labor, family, and membership to supportive communities (Standing, 2011). Finally, they have observed a good deal of anger at blocked upward mobility and the increasingly growing disparities between the rich and poor. In most of these circumstances, people felt governments and politicians, allied with economic elites, were indifferent at best, duplicitous at worst, and in any event blatantly closed to popular concerns. These perceptions generated a profound sense of injustice, and humiliation was soon turned into indignation and anger. Many journalists have indeed asked what took so long for people to protest given this fatal combination of unresponsive governments, socioeconomic crises, and increasing populations in precarious circumstances. For the social scientist concerned with social movements and their expression in protests, however, many questions arose as to what kind of actors became participants in these mobilizations, and how and why were they led to, or perhaps drawn to participate. What was the course of these movements and, beyond massive publicity, what exactly have they accomplished since they emerged? For students of mobilization these are often complex questions; there are specific problematics of mediation between structure, culture, and individual or collective agency that need to be addressed. Moreover, as will be evident from the collection of articles that constitute this monograph issue, the dominant paradigms for understanding social movements had failed to consider what we think are major problems and traits of the 20112012 mobilizations. The current monograph issue is the offspring of the international conference From Social to Political: New Forms of Mobilization and Democratization, held in Bilbao, Spain, on 910 February 2012. This conference was a joint activity organized by two of the International Sociological Association (ISA) Research Committees: Social Movements and Social Classes (RC47) and Social Movements, Collective Action and Social Change (RC48). A number of scholars representing different regions, different academic networks, and different orientations came together in Bilbao to share their ideas, theories, and research concerning this new wave of contentious mobilizations. The primary objective of the conference was to foster theoretical reflections and present empirical evidence on the mobilizations that began in 2011 and soon spread all around the world. The meeting provided, as well, an opportunity to engage in a necessary and enriching debate about the continuities and discontinuities established between these mobilizations and previous social movements in terms of their contexts, organization, repertoires, and identity work. In this introductory article to the monograph issue we try to address two simple, though in our opinion highly urgent, questions. First, what is at the core of this international wave of protests? Or, in other words, what are the main forces driving these movements, and what distinguishes them from previous types of mobilization? And, second, can these mobilizations be interpreted as parts of a novel cycle of contention? If so, what are its distinctive traits in terms of diffusion, coordination, action repertoires, frames, and types of activism?

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

380

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

Social inequality:The heart of current global mobilizations

In the following section we contend that the mobilizations that began in Tunisia in 2011 are part of one cycle of contention (Tarrow, 1998). Before doing that, we would like to argue that this cycle has had global dimensions, though different regional expressions. The analysis of such a wave of protests carries in its very womb the danger of naturalizing the global scale of contestation, that is, assuming that this is a global cycle of contention without really testing this premise - just like social movement studies have often done with the national scale of analysis through a still powerful methodological nationalism.1 While we understand that the global diffusion of neoliberal capitalism and its widespread social impacts have swiftly concatenated political upheavals around the world, we believe social contestation has been articulated in regional terms, and that regional and local socioeconomic and political contexts have played an important role in this articulation (see also Baumgarten, this issue). We thus distinguish two clearly identifiable threads within the current cycle of protest. First, those mobilizations that have mainly demanded political reforms to initiate or deepen ongoing processes of democratization in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco, Libya, and Syria, among others. Second, the massive displays of discontent regarding the political mismanagement of the socioeconomic crisis and the erosion of the welfare state in Southern Europe and also in the United States. Among the latter are the 15M mobilizations in Spain, the Indignate-vous protests in France, the outraged Greeks of Syntagma Square, the hundreds of Occupy Wall Street mobilizations, and other demonstrations of young people and students in Britain, Belgium, and Israel. However different these streams may be in terms of the grievances they express, and the socioeconomic and political contexts in which they have emerged, we argue that the antecedent conditions for these mobilizations are to be found in the increasing levels of social inequality that have accompanied global capitalism as it became globalized, financialized, and legitimated by neoliberalism. The growing levels of poverty, inequality, and the precarious nature of employment have been either the result of, or deepened by, processes of deindustrialization that moved manufacturing to the Far East, the financialization of global capital (including speculations of currency convertibility, the derivatives market, interest rates, and commodities), and neoliberal structural adjustment policies have privileged debt payment over social benefits and/or social investments. As a result, we have seen that neoliberal globalization has had adverse consequences for many people while at the same time it has created vast wealth concentrated in the hands of a small minority.2 Although the Arab Spring uprisings have been portrayed as purely political mobilizations (i.e. primarily concerned with the democratization of dictatorial political regimes), these various movements have also been rooted in the particular impact that neoliberalism has had in their respective societies (see Moghadam, this issue). As in Europe, although in more alarming levels, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) societies are characterized by a sharp polarization of incomes, the exclusion of a rapidly growing class of educated yet unemployed youth, raising prices for basic commodities, the retrenchment of government services, and, in turn, a growing precariat (Standing, 2011).

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

Tejerina et al.

381

We thus argue that the growing levels of inequality and precarious employment behind the wave of protests requires us to bring political economy back in. While this may seem self-evident, we might note that most contemporary perspectives on social mobilizations had generally moved away from the kinds of political economic concerns typical of earlier generations of workers movements, often tied to socialist and communist parties. With the growth of the welfare state, many of the workers grievances and/ or insecurities over health care or retirement benefits were assuaged. Moreover, between the growing nationalism that emerged in the late 19th century and the consumerism of the 21st century, collective identities generally moved from work and politics to patterns of consumption, cultural tastes, and leisure activities. This move, however, left younger workers bereft of union and/or work organizations in which they might collectively, and more forcefully, contest certain economic policies. We claim that the centrality of inequality as the main force propelling the current cycle of mobilization calls for rethinking previous decades of New Social Movements analyses that focused mainly, or solely, on issues of culture and collective identity. On the other hand, although the Civil Rights and the Feminist movements did also deal with the issue of social inequality, and put inequality at the heart of sociopolitical and sociological debate for one or two decades, we must recognize we are now dealing with very different types of social differences. This legacy has given social movement scholars a generalized sensation of helplessness when trying to analyze and explain the 2011-2012 cycle of contention. Almost in awe, many have grumbled that our discipline could not have predicted the present wave of mobilization; they have also lamented that once it was already under our sight, we lacked the analytical framework that could enable its comprehension. We would like to argue differently: useful frameworks do exist, but they have been overshadowed by decades of empirical and theoretical Euro and US-centrism within social movement studies. The current mobilizational pattern marks an approach of social movements emerging in the developed or rich economies towards social movements already acting in the developing nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. These movements have now been struggling against socioeconomic crises associated with deindustrialization and neoliberal adjustment policies for more than two decades. We should thus look in this direction to find relevant theoretical tools to advance our understanding of the current cycle of mobilization.

Occupy social movements: A new cycle of social contention

We would suggest that these various occupy social movements, with their protests, demonstrations, and occupations of public space should be seen as diverse instantiations of an international cycle of contention fighting against social and economic inequality. Their primary goals, if not visions, include a transformation of the economic system to provide greater opportunities, greater equality, and greater personal fulfillment. Moreover, these movements also seek to democratize power in more participatory ways that empower the masses bearing the brunt of economic strains. In some cases, particularly in societies with long-term leftist, if not socialist traditions, this has been combined

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

382

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

with demands for radical political change, as protesters do not consider themselves to be represented by any traditional party, either on the Left or Right, nor do they consider to have benefited from the structural adjustment measures approved by elected politicians. We argue that these mobilizations are part of one cycle of contention (Tarrow, 1998). During the last two years, we have observed a rare class of historical events: a concatenation of political upheavals, expanding repertoires of contention (Tarrow, 1995), one detonating the other, across three different regions of the world. In an extraordinarily rapid diffusion and coordination of collective action, ongoing mobilizations and social movements have created political opportunities for others to act or join in. Activists around the world have also coordinated efforts, particularly during the organization of Global Action Days. On 15 October 2011, 951 cities in 82 countries witnessed simultaneous demonstrations and assemblies aimed at initiating global change against capitalism and austerity measures. The second Global Day of Action, 12 May 2012, was organized by occupy social movements around the world to rally against corporate greed, corruption, human rights violations, police brutality, and censorship. From 1215 May 2012 protesters took the streets to hold assemblies, performances, workshops, and debates addressing the status of public education, migration, the housing crisis, the environment, unemployment, civil disobedience, feminism, youth, pensioners, and more. Finally, on 14 November 2012, European workers held their biggest ever coordinated strike action. Called by the European Trade Union Confederation, the European Action and Solidarity Day coordinated a considerable amount of protests against the austerity programs that have been gripping the region since the mid-2000s. General strikes took place in Spain and Portugal; Greece saw a three-hour stoppage starting at noon and rallies ending in Syntagma Square; and workers held a four-hour stoppage in Italy. Many occupy social movements endorsed and participated in the mobilization. The present international cycle of protest has also been characterized by innovation in both the forms of contention, and the generation or modification of discourses and frames. Repertoires of contention (Tilly, 1995), that is, protest-related tools and actions, have included the creation of special-purpose coalitions, and a myriad of public meetings, vigils, demonstrations, sit-ins, petition drives, statements to and in public media, boycotts, strikes, and pamphleteering. Most importantly, they have also entailed the occupation of the public space. In the past, radical actions have often started at places of work or study and involved their occupation. Although strikes and factory or school occupations did take place in some countries such as Egypt or Greece, the most common form of action amid the 20112012 mobilizations entailed reclaiming the public space. The extensive use of this tactic in the Middle East, Europe, and the United States has inspired our term occupy social movements. The choice of this term emerges from the verification that this tactic has served strategic but also symbolic purposes in every mobilization since Tunisia; it has not been driven by the glare of Occupy Wall Street and related mobilizations in the United States. Across the world, squares and plazas have become public spheres where people could not only share alternatives, if not counter-hegemonic discourse, information, viewpoints, and ideas, but also where they could develop a sense of community and incubate novel forms of collective projects and identities. Our term occupy social movements intends to respond, in part, to the preeminence that has been given to the role played by social media and online activism in the explanation

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

Tejerina et al.

383

of the current cycle of protest. As we discuss below, the embodied, territorialized political praxis associated with these occupations was indeed combined with the intensive and savvy use of social media. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, n-1, and movement web pages operated not only as potent means of information and organization, but also, probably for the first time on such a large scale, as deterritorialized spaces for doing disembodied politics from-the-ground-up in both a deliberative and horizontal fashion. It was however the physical encounter with others that actually gave birth to the movement. As people encountered one another in the heart of the city, in the public space, they began to piece together common notions: they became collectively conscious of an enemy, and of a desire to do something about that enemy (Merrifield, 2011). This is how camps sprung up, spontaneously. Moreover, the conscientious choice of streets and squares as locales for mobilization has had a pivotal impact on the movements repertoire of contention: it has enabled the organization of massive camps and public meetings, or popular assemblies, where participants have experimented with the techniques of participatory democracy. The 2011 2012 cycle of protest gave democracy a new meaning, turning it into a horizontal, deliberative, transparent, and participatory dialogue between common persons not only activists, or militants concerned with the common good. In doing this, it demonstrated that another way of engaging with the public sphere was possible, and it helped initiate or re-engage vast numbers of citizens previously disenchanted with, or disbelievers of politics as a key mechanism for the transformation of social reality. This wave of protests also gave democracy a new locale; taking it out of dim, hierarchical, and bureaucratized institutional redoubts, and bringing it to the light and openness of the public space. The cycle marked, as well, the outing of horizontal deliberation from the social movement micro spheres to which it had been traditionally confined such as the feminist or the squatter movement and its diffusion and massification (Romanos, 2011). Much of the Occupy movements democratic process occurs in working groups, where any protestor can have their say. However, important decisions are often made at general assemblies using the consensus model of direct democracy. These meetings operate with discussion facilitators rather than leaders, and often feature the use of hand signals to increase participation. The political socialization of thousands of men and women, young and old, in this type of horizontal and deliberative political praxis is, perhaps, one of the most important outcomes of this cycle of contention. So is the feeling that in participating in these encounters activists were forging, and simultaneously living, their own collective utopia. The tactic of occupation of the public space has thus had a transcendent impact on these occupy social movements. The contentious repertoire of these movements has entailed, as well, the active refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands emitted by local governments. These acts of civil disobedience have come, in large part, hand in hand with the nonviolent resistance to the forcible removal of protest camps and police repression. The movements have portrayed nonviolence as a strength. In words of the manifesto drafted by the Spanish indignados, and then translated and adopted by Occupy in the United States, nonviolence avoids labeling and doesnt allow the system to delegitimize our message. It allows multiple actions instead of a physical battle that makes us much weaker than the system. It also allows everyone to participate (men, women, young, old, legal,

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

384

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

illegals, the coward and the bold) (Source: http://howtooccupy.org/). However, what seemed to be an unbreakable initial commitment with nonviolence has been questioned as months passed by, particularly after the clashes with the police that saw about 400 arrests in the city of Oakland in January 2012. Some protesters and witnesses said the police initiated the violence, others said there was violence against the police; however, they blamed Black Bloc anarchists and agents provocateurs. The 20112012 cycle has also been characterized by innovation in the terrain of discourse and frames. The return to inequality and injustice as master frames galvanizing mobilization brings us back to the times of the Civil Rights and the Feminist movements. As mentioned above, this discursive shift denotes a departure from previous decades of New Social Movements analyses focused on issues of identity. It also marks an approach towards social movements located in the developing nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. On the other hand, the demand for real (genuine) democracy, not solely of democratization, has also functioned as a master frame inspiring protest, particularly across Europe and the United States. This frame has distilled and condensed pervasive feelings and understandings about everything that seems to be wrong about the functioning of democracy: the lack of representation of the popular will, clientelism, and corruption, to name just the most relevant ones. The diffusion of these frames from one occupy movement to the other has been accompanied by the international borrowing of slogans. Transmitted via social media and the most recent information communication technologies, mottoes such as the Spanish we are not commodities in the hands of politicians and bankers, or the American we are the 99% have traveled around the world and inspired new waves of mobilization. In addition, organized and unorganized, professional and amateur activists coexist, and collaborate in the 20112012 cycle of contention. These mobilizations were initially called for by core constituencies of young, often college-educated, typically under-/unemployed citizens who articulated widespread grievances and rapidly attracted many other groups, classes, and age cohorts. It must be noted, however, that younger generations acted as catalysts, igniting but not really leading the protests. These are horizontal, leaderless movements that have amassed overwhelming support across sociodemographic and even politico-ideological cleavages, attracting the participation and engagement of thousands of men and women with no previous political knowledge or participation. Many of the core actors in the present movements had, however, been involved in earlier progressive mobilizations (e.g. student and squatter movements, anti-evictions and feminist groups, mobilizations against cyber censorship), and as a result, these mobilizations drew on submerged, pre-existent social movement networks. These networks provided the occupy movements with know-how, infrastructure, and methods, which were quickly transformed into manuals, tutorials, and manifestos that allowed the viral and almost immediate replication of experiences around the globe. These previous militant contestations thus enabled the activation of contacts and ties, whether weak or strong, that opened the way to new types of dialogues and eventually yielded collaborations in different initiatives and projects. Furthermore, while these movements cannot be said to be expressions of identity politics, the issue of identity is quite salient. One of the central themes in occupy movements has been the attempt to attain/restore valorized identities that provide the person or the

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

Tejerina et al.

385

group with recognition and dignity, as opposed to the marginalization associated with both the socioeconomic implosions and the perceived indifference of political elites. Participants in some countries declared that since the social contract between the government and the people had been violated, a new contract had to be established giving top priority to peoples welfare. They even began to call themselves new citizens. However, protesters were demanding recognition not just as citizens, but also as human beings with the right to lead lives worth living. Some occupy movements have explicitly referred to the values of inclusion, toleration, sharing, and caring, and have even envisioned an alternative kind of society, more concerned with the realization of humanistic and community values than the endless and mindless pursuit of individual profits. Accordingly, the social movement community has been defined and portrayed in the broadest possible way: terms like the 99%, the persons, the people or the middle class have at times replaced, or been combined with, the idea of activist or militant. As a consequence, occupy movements around the globe have banned politicoideological flags and banners that could divide or even repel current or potential supporters and participants from campsites, assemblies, and demonstrations. They have also encouraged the individual development of mottoes and placards, characterized by an amalgam of naivety and sarcasm, ingenuity and creativity. This strategy has garnered the movements broad public support. Finally, in each of the occupy movements analyzed in this monograph issue we have witnessed how crises fostered anger, fear, anxiety, and pain. Although the mainstream media have foregrounded outrage or indignation as the emotions galvanizing protests, other emotions such as humiliation and hope usually disregarded as mobilizing factors by social movement scholars have clearly played an important role in generating and sustaining motivation and engagement. Furthermore, participants were evidently experiencing joy, efficacy, and empowerment derived from their encounter with others in a similar situation amid these protests. These constellations of emotions were among the primary factors driving people to participate in various direct actions and demonstrations. Moreover, most of these mobilizations were marked by a groundbreaking display of humor, irony, and parody that could be announcing the inception of a new type of ludic activism (see Perugorra and Tejerina, this issue), with pleasure, play, and creativity at its core.

Bridging structural and constructivist approaches in the study of social contention

We have noted that the two streams of mobilization that compose the 20112012 wave of protests can be distinguished in terms of the specific grievances they express, and the socioeconomic and political contexts in which they have emerged. We have argued, however, that despite these differences, both threads are rooted in the political economy in which globalization, financialization, and neoliberalism had produced vast wealth for the elites, but increasing levels of social and economic inequality, and ever greater immiseration and degradation for growing numbers of the precariat (Standing, 2011). Therefore, we have made a case for bringing political economy back in the analysis of social mobilization. Accordingly, we have defined the various occupy social movements, with their

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

386

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

protests, demonstrations, and occupations of public space, as diverse manifestations of an international cycle of contention fighting against socioeconomic injustice, whose primary goals and visions include a transformation of the economic system to provide greater opportunities, equality, and personal fulfillment. We have mentioned, as well, that these movements also seek to democratize power in more participatory ways in order to empower the sectors bearing the burden of economic strains. In the previous section we also identified the differential traits of this new cycle of contention, in terms of diffusion, coordination, innovation, action repertoires and frames, and different types of activism. Before delving into the individual contributions made by each of the articles included in this monograph issue, we would like to reflect on the necessity of building a bridge between structuralist and cultural or constructivist approaches to the study of social movements. The current cycle of mobilization forces us to rethink the structureagency culture link. Structural conditions and contradictions that foster legitimation crises (see Langman, this issue), and in turn the loss or lack of jobs, displacements, and exclusions, can lead to a decline in the legitimacy of the elites, withdrawal of loyalty to the system, and, in turn, provide openings that prompt collective action. While the social movements of today have been responses to legitimation crises, these conditions do not lead to social movements per se. Crises of the system, assaults to ones identity need to arouse collective emotions such as moral shocks (Jasper, 1997: 165); events must be interpreted, alternative identities, understandings, and visions must be negotiated, mobilizing networks must emerge, and strategies must be chosen. Gaining an identity, individually or collectively, is an interpersonal process that involves emotions. Collective identities are also the consequences of group membership activities that provide gratifying attachments, recognition, feelings of agency, and shared meanings that assuage anxiety and uncertainty. Moreover, collective identities mediate between events and emotional responses. We thus argue that the consideration of emotions, collective identity, and cultural meanings is necessary to understand the current wave of mobilizations (see Benski and Langman, this issue). When governments, whether elected or imposed dictatorships, fail to provide the conditions for economic security and growth, expanded opportunities for its populations, and/or they retrench or privatize social programs providing education, health care or retirement pensions, and when at the same time the growing wealth and political power of elites is especially visible, people experience indignation, or a moral shock. This is a violation of the feelings, values, emotions, and beliefs they have about themselves, their society, and its leadership. Such breaches violate what are considered normal standards of decency (Jasper, 1997), and in turn dispose joining and participating in social movements that promise emotional gratifications in a soon-to-be transformed society.

Contributions
This monograph issue compiles the work of contributors from eight different countries: Argentina, France, Germany, Greece, Iran, Israel, Italy, Spain, and the United States. In addition, its editors represent four continents characterized by diverse and vibrant sociological traditions. The scope of the monograph issue is considerably broad, as the studies

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

Tejerina et al.

387

touch on cases at various junctures: Egypt, Greece, Iran, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Portugal, Spain, Tunisia, and the United States. The monograph issue brings a holistic perspective to the study of the 20112012 global wave of mobilizations that rejects both cultural and economic, and even political reductionism. On the contrary, the articles focus on substantive topics such as identities, emotions, cognition, repertoires, cultural resources, the media, and the interaction between social movements, international institutions, and the state. These approaches cut across the boundaries of New Social Movement, resource mobilization, political opportunity structures, social construction, and interpretive theories, and put them in critical dialogue. The scope, contribution, and limits of the different theoretical approaches covered in the proposal, as well as the tensions that exist between them, will be addressed in the conclusion to this monograph issue. The contributors attempt theoretical clarification of particular aspects of the 2011 2012 mobilizations while staying empirically grounded. The articles included in the monograph draw on different research designs (e.g. case studies, historical-comparative methods) and data gathering methods (e.g. in-depth interviews, classic and virtual ethnography, analysis of newspaper articles, movement documents, Twitter streams). However, all these articles deal with social movements that are currently evolving and may move forward in new directions as a consequence of different political, socioeconomic, and cultural developments. The conclusion of our monograph issue will elaborate upon the methodological challenges and the theoretical implications involved in freezing ongoing social movements that are affected by, and producers of, social change for their empirical analysis; we will also consider the impact of this strategy on the validity and generalizability of our findings. Valentine Moghadams article focuses on three early cases of the Arab Spring Tunisia, Egypt, and Morocco to discuss causes and likely outcomes, gender dynamics, prospects for genuine democratization, and the connection between feminist movements and democratization. Her comparative and international perspective highlights similarities and differences across the Arab cases and between the Arab Spring and other democracy waves. Thierry Desrues discusses the 20th February Movement, (M20F), a series of demonstrations that began in early 2011 in Morocco, in the context of the Arab Spring. His paper describes the historical trajectory of recent protests in the country, the emergence and structuring of the movement, and the neutralization strategy developed by the Moroccan political regime. The author argues that both the nature of the M20F - marked by a profound heterogeneity and dualism, and the hybrid configuration of the Moroccan political regime - offering a variety of repertoires of legitimation for the management of the protests, favoured the failure of the M20F movement. Ignacia Perugorra and Benjamn Tejerina offer an analysis of the 15M mobilizations in Spain by focusing on three analytical axes: the cognitive, emotional, and relational processes feeding the construction of a social movement identity. First, the article refers to the diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational framing tasks performed by 15M participants. Second, it concentrates on the emotions that were mobilized by social movement organizations linked to the 15M, and those that emerged spontaneously during the encounters that took place in the public space. Finally, the article addresses the relational aspects

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

388

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

entailed in the process of identity construction: the activation and de-activation of both real and imaginary ties between 15M members and political and social collectives within the progressive field. In doing this, the article describes the process of identitysynchronization that has allowed people with no previous political participation and with different and oftentimes opposing politico-ideological trajectories to meet in the public space and feel part of the same movement. The authors contend that the politics of the encounter performed by 15M members has allowed them to depart from old-time politics by temporarily experiencing the utopia of doing real democracy now. Nikos Sotirakopoulos and George Sotiropoulos analyze the extended period of sociopolitical turmoil in Greece since 2008: the financial and socioeconomic crisis, and Greek peoples resistance to the countrys custody under the Troika of the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, and the European Central Bank. The authors examine a wide repertoire of collective actions, giving particular emphasis to Syntagma Squares Outraged and their daily protests during the summer of 2011. They attempt to fit the case of Greece in the global capitalist crisis and the struggles that have arisen as a response, and they argue for the importance of spotting the movements cultural resources as well as its inner class and ideological divisions. The authors contend that despite the unprecedented number of participants and the intensity of its clash with the state, the movement has remained underreported in relation to other similar phenomena. Britta Baumgarten analyses the Portuguese Geraao Rasca mobilizations starting in March 2011. She contends that international events and the import of ideas from movements abroad have had an important impact on the claims of this desperate generation; activists see their grievances related to the various struggles in other countries, they import action forms and frames and maintain contacts with activists outside Portugal. However, the organizational structure, as well as most of the claims and frames of the movement are adapted and remain country-specific. The article thus argues that the nation-state is still an important factor in social movement. Stefania Vicari investigates the use of social media for public reasoning around issues involving social contention. By focusing on Twitter streams with reference to the Italian chapter of the October 15 2011 polycentric protest for Global Change, her study addresses the use of Twitter in the aftermath of protest events of high impact for the general public. The author focuses on Twitter for two reasons: its booming usage and its emerging role in contemporary mobilizations around the world. The quantitative analysis of longitudinal progression, networking mechanisms, and processes of meaning construction in over 8000 tweets shows that Twitter has eased centralized processes of information sharing between social movement entrepreneurs and social movement publics, and that it has bolstered the crowdsourced management of public discussion around social contention. According to the author, Twitter has done so as a news medium rather than a conversational platform, primarily providing a space to share information alternative to that available in mainstream media coverage. Lev Luis Grinbergs article aims to analyze the spontaneous popular movement J14 that erupted into the Israeli public sphere during the Summer of 2011, following the Egyptian and Spanish upheavals. The J14 movement was ignited by opposition to housing prices, and later expanded into protests against neo-liberal economic policies and socio-economic inequality. The author utilizes the concept of resistance mo(ve)ment to

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

Tejerina et al.

389

comprehend the peculiar intersection between the movement and moment of mass mobilization. The article explores the political and economic global and local background and context in which the movement emerged, and analyzes the role of a new generationalclass (the B Generation) who suffered the effects of neo-liberal political economy. The argument is that socio-economic protests in Israel take place when the conflict with external enemies is quiet and thus cannot be used to repress socio-economic agendas. Lauren Langmans contribution examines the Occupy Wall Street movement in the United States. Langman argues that, while clearly precipitated by specific issues such as the lack of meaningful jobs, blocked mobility, and the privatization of services and resources, Occupy can be best understood through New Social Movement theory. Langman asserts that these movements of the excluded are contestations over cultural meanings and the recognition of new lifestyles and identities; they seek cultural transformations through identity-informed participatory, democratic dialogues and have visions of alternative decommodified subjectivities and meanings for society. Finally, Lauren Langman and Tova Benski focus on the emotional aspect of the 2011 mobilizations. They offer a theoretical frame for the analysis of counter-hegemonic mobilizations such as the Arab Spring, Israeli Summer, the London riots, Greek protests, the Spanish indignados and the Occupy Wall Street movement. Basing their argument on Habermass thesis of legitimation crises, they suggest that a process of emotional liberation was intertwined with McAdams cognitive liberation in the process of subjectivation as put forward by Touraine. They state that a constellation of noncongruent emotions such as distrust of and disrespect for authorities/elites or their perceived agents, indignation and righteous anger, humiliation, and in turn hope for an alternative future gave rise to the 2011 mobilizations. In stressing both macro and micro level emotional constellations, they propose an argument that is a combination of macro and micro processes of cognition and emotions. Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Notes
1. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewer of the monograph issue for this observation. 2. A similar experience can be found in the Latin American mobilizations of the late 1990s and early 2000s, with the Argentine upheaval of December 2001 and the subsequent emergence of a neighborhood assembly movement probably being the most notorious. Neoliberal adjustment policies pushed by the International Monetary Fund, and their profoundly distressing social effects, reached South American countries a decade earlier than they did Europe, and so did that cycle of protests. These experiences have had a symbolic impact on European mobilizations that should not be disregarded. Sotirakopoulos and Sotiropouloss article in this monograph issue refers to the Argentine helicopter in which the president at that time was forced to flee office after declaring the state of siege; recent demonstrations in Spain have also featured a placard with the Argentine Out with all of them! (Que se vayan todos!) slogan.

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

390 References

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

Castells M (2012) Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jasper J (1997) The Art of Moral Protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Merrifield A (2011) Crowd politics, or, Here comes everybuddy. New Left Review 71: 103114. Romanos E (2011) El 15M y la democracia de los movimientos sociales. La Vie des ides. Available at: www.booksandideas.net/El-15M-y-la-democracia-de-los.html (accessed 18 November 2011). Standing G (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Tarrow S (1995) Cycles of collective action: Between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. In: Traugott M (ed.) Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 89115. Tarrow S (1998) Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tilly C (1995) Contentions repertoires in Great Britain, 17581834. In: Traugott M (ed.) Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1542. Author biographies Benjamn Tejerina is Professor of Sociology and director of the Collective Identity Research Center at the University of the Basque Country. His research interests include collective action and social movements, living conditions, precariousness and transformations in the work culture, sociology of language and ethnolinguistic movements, collective identity, social conflict and youth transitions, and sociological theory. Among his selected publications are From Social to Political: New Forms of Mobilization and Democratization (edited with I Perugorra, 2012); La sociedad imaginada: Movimientos sociales y cambio cultural en Espaa (2010); Barrios multiculturales: Relaciones intertnicas en los barrios de San Francisco (Bilbao) y Embajadores/Lavapis (Madrid) (edited with A Prez-Agote and M Baraano, 2010); Hacia una nueva cultura de la identidad y la poltica: Tendencias en la juventud vasca (with B Cavia, G Gatti, AG Seguel, I Martnez de Albniz, S Rodrguez Maeso, A Prez-Agote, and E Santamara, 2005); Los movimientos sociales: Transformaciones polticas y cambio cultural (edited with P Ibarra, 1998); and Sociedad civil, protesta y movimientos sociales en el Pas Vasco (with JM Fernndez Sobrado and X Aierdi, 1995). In 1990 he received the National PhD Dissertation Award in Sociology and Political Sciences from the Sociological Research Center (CIS, Spain). He is the president of the Research Committee on Social Movements, Collective Action and Social Change (RC48) of the International Sociological Association. Ignacia Perugorra is a PhD candidate in sociology at Rutgers University, working on the interaction between identity battles, social movement networks, and political opportunity structures in the making of participatory culture. She is a Fulbright scholar and has also been awarded fellowships by the Institute of International Education and the Graduate School at Rutgers University. She received her MA in sociology at Rutgers and her BA at the University of Buenos Aires, both with honors. She is affiliated to the Gino Germani Research Institute (University of Buenos Aires) and is currently a visiting researcher at the Collective Identity Research Center (University of the Basque Country). She has participated in numerous research projects with Argentine, American, and European funding, and has taught undergraduate and graduate courses both in Latin America and the United States. Her most recent publications include Global Movements, National Grievances: Mobilizing for Real Democracy and Social Justice and From Social to Political: New Forms of Mobilization and Democratization (edited with B Tejerina, 2012). She is also the

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

Tejerina et al.

391

co-editor of Grassroots: The Newsletter of the Research Committee on Social Movements, Collective Action and Social Change of the International Sociological Association. Her research interests lie at the intersection of culture and politics, with a particular focus on cultural activism and cultural citizenship. Tova Benski is a senior lecturer at the Department of Behavioral Sciences, the College of Management-Academic Studies, Rishon Lezion, Israel. Her fields of academic interest and research include: qualitative research methods, gender, social movements, peace studies, and the sociology of emotions. She has been engaged in research on the Israeli womens peace mobilizations since the late 1980s and has published extensively and presented many papers on these topics. Her co-authored book Iraqi Jews in Israel won a prestigious academic prize in Israel. The former president of the Research Committee on Social Movements, Collective Action and Social Change (RC48) of the International Sociological Association, currently she is a member of the Board (RC48) and a member of the Research Committees on Alienation Theory and Research (RC36) and Family Research (RC06). Lauren Langman is a Professor of Sociology at Loyola University of Chicago. He received his PhD at the University of Chicago from the Committee on Human Development and received psychoanalytic training at the Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis. He has long worked in the tradition of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, especially on the relationships between culture, identity, and politics/political movements. He is past president of the Research committee on Alienation Research and Theory (RC36) of the International Sociological Association as well as past president of the Marxist section of the American Sociological Association. His recent publications deal with globalization, alienation, global justice movements, the body, nationalism, and national character. His most recent books are Trauma Promise and Millennium: The Evolution of Alienation, with Devorah Kalekin and Alienation and Carnivalization with Jerome Braun.

Rsum La prsente monographie porte sur les vagues mondiales de protestation de 2011 2012, qui ont commenc en Tunisie en 2011. Dans cet article dintroduction, nous avons not que deux flux entrelacs de mobilisation peuvent tre distingus en termes de dolances spcifiques quils expriment, et de contexte socio-conomique et politique dans lequel ils sont apparus. Nous avons fait valoir, cependant, que malgr ces diffrences, les deux courants sont tributaires de laugmentation du niveau de la vie sociale et conomique, ce qui oblige les thories des mouvements sociaux ramener lconomie politique dans lanalyse de la mobilisation sociale. Nous avons en outre fait valoir que les diffrents mouvements Occupy, avec leurs protestations, manifestations et occupations de lespace public, peuvent tre vus comme des manifestations diverses et novatrices dun cycle international de lutte contre linjustice socio-conomique. Visant transformer le systme conomique afin quil puisse offrir davantage de possibilits, dgalit et dpanouissement personnel, ils cherchent dmocratiser le pouvoir par des moyens plus participatifs. Mots-cls Printemps arabe, cycles de protestation, dmocratisation, Indigns, mouvements Occupy, ingalits socio-conomiques

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013

392

Current Sociology Monograph 2 61(4)

Resumen Este nmero monogrfico se centra en la ola global de protestas que empez en Tnez en el ao 2011. Este artculo seala que, en trminos de sus reivindicaciones especficas y el contexto socioeconmico y poltico en el que han aparecido, se pueden distinguir dos corrientes de movilizacin. Sin embargo, sostenemos que a pesar de ciertas diferencias ambas tienen su origen en el incremento de los niveles de desigualdad econmica y social, lo que plantea la necesidad de volver a la economa poltica en el anlisis de la movilizacin social. Adems, sealamos que la visin y objetivos prioritarios de los diversos movimientos de ocupacin, con sus protestas, manifestaciones y ocupaciones del espacio pblico, bajo diferentes e innovadoras manifestaciones, forman parte de un nuevo ciclo internacional de oposicin contra la injusticia social y econmica, y que tiene una doble pretensin: la trasformacin del sistema econmico para que proporcione mayores oportunidades, equidad y posibilidades de realizacin personal, y la democratizacin del poder para hacerlo ms participativo. Palabras clave Primavera rabe, ciclos de contienda, democratizacin,indignados, movimientos de ocupacin, desigualdad socioeconmica

Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com by guest on September 15, 2013