Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
United Nations
asdf
Human beings are at the center of concerns for sustainable development. They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature.
Principle 1 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, June 1992
Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Sustainable Development National Information Analysis Unit
asdf
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The material used in the National Implementation of Agenda 21: A Summary is based upon information contained in national reports submitted by Governments since 1994 to the Commission on Sustainable Development. The Secretariat would like to thank the 130 countries that have submitted national reports thus far. Special thanks also go to the National Focal Points who have played an important role over the years in coordinating the preparation and submission of these reports. The Secretariat is most grateful to all the graduate students that over the years have participated in our work through the United Nations Internship Programme and the United Nations volunteers. Their assistance in identifying and analyzing information contained in national reports to be reflected in the current report, which required enormous concentration, patience and accuracy, has been invaluable.Without their assistance, the preparation of this summary would not have been possible.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 PART I: GLOBAL CHARTS ON SELECTED ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 AGRICULTURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 COMBATING POVERTY ............................................8 DECISION-MAKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 EDUCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ENERGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 FRESHWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 HEALTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 OCEANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 PART II: SAMPLER OF REGIONAL AND NATIONAL LEVEL INFORMATION . . . 25 COMBATING POVERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 HEALTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 ANNEXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Annex I. Table on International Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Annex II. Countries Reporting Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
iii
PREFACE
The National Implementation of Agenda 21: A Summary provides an overview of the general status of national implementation of Agenda 21, based upon the national reports and 2002 Country Profiles submitted by Governments to the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). The report in its entirety (approximately 300 pages), complete with tables and charts, is available on the National Information web page of the United Nations Sustainable Development website at the following address: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/.This published version provides an illustrative summary of a selection of both sectoral and cross-sectoral issues, which are among those being discussed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg, South Africa in 2002. The National Implementation report was prepared by the National Information Analysis Unit in the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN/DESA). Since 1993, this Unit has analyzed and maintained national reports submitted to the CSD by Governments through their designated National Focal Points, and 1997 and 2002 Country Profiles prepare for the Earth Summit +5 and the World Summit on Sustainable Development, respectively.The Unit is in the process of developing a web-enabled database on national implementation which will, when completed, significantly facilitate interaction between the UN Secretariat and the National Focal Points in requesting and submitting future national reports, as well as provide better service to world-wide users for searching and retrieving specific information. Information services are not static but rather dynamic dimensions of the work of the Division for Sustainable Development, and therefore we welcome any feedback, comments and suggestions to this report as well as to any aspects of the Divisions work related to national information analysis. Jo Anne DiSano
Director Division for Sustainable Development Department of Economic and Social Affairs United Nations
iv
INTRODUCTION
The National Implementation of Agenda 21: A Summary has been prepared to provide a global outlook of the status of national implementation of Agenda 21.The full report, covering all the chapters of Agenda 21 and those issues that have been separately addressed by the CSD in recent years, will be available on the web at: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/. It should be noted that the information contained in the 2002 Country Profiles submitted to the National Information Analysis Unit after 24 May 2002 and prior to the WSSD will be continuously analyzed and reflected in the full report at the aforementioned website. The report is based upon the national information provided by Governments as part of the national reporting process on the national implementation of Agenda 21 dating back to 1994. It also responds to the request made by Governments in Resolution 2001/PC/1 entitled Progress in the preparatory activities at the local, national, sub-regional, regional and international levels as well as by major groups, whereby, in paragraph 7, it invites the Secretariat to prepare a Trends Report based on the national reports/country profiles submitted to the CSD. Part I of this summary version illustrates global charts on selected issues and Part II illustrates a sample of charts on regional and national implementation related to two key issues: Combating Poverty, and Health.
METHODOLOGY
A decision was made to report only on a selection of issues, since the purpose is only to give a preview or glimpse into the national implementation of Agenda 21 for which information is sufficiently available; namely: - Agriculture; - Combating Poverty; - Decision-Making (e.g. institutions and strategy issues); - Education (based on sectoral perspectives); - Energy (part of consumption & production issue); - Freshwater; - Health; - Information (based on sectoral perspectives); and, - Oceans. This report illustrates those activities that are most representative across regions (Africa, Asia & Pacific, Europe & North America, Latin America & Caribbean, and Western Asia). The following aspects, including Means of Implementation, have been integrated into the sectoral issues: decision-making, major groups participation, education, information, financing, technology and international cooperation. Issue-specific explanations for these aspects are given in conjunction with the graphics presented; a generic glossary is given below: Decision-Making refers to a) Coordinating Body; and b) Participation of Major Groups in decision-making. Major Groups participation may comprise all 9 of them or, when specific major groups appear to be crucial to the decision-making process, they have been highlighted accordingly. Programmes and Projects reflect those mentioned in the specific chapter of Agenda 21 (with paragraph references) and on which information was provided. Education aspect focuses on public awaress-raising, training and the inclusion of the sustainable development concept in curricula. Information aspect focuses on management of data on sustainable development ranging from comprehensive information systems to ways to collect and manage information such as inventories, surveys and databases. Financing relates to domestic financing, e.g. subsidies, taxes, incentives and polluter pays principle. Technology relates to issues such as forecasting (e.g. disaster forecasting), genetic resource conservation, biodiversity research and alternative energy sources. Cooperation focuses on aspects of international cooperation not considered in international agreements (which are presented in Annex I) such as: forms of cooperation within states or sharing information systems at the regional level. The analysis of the status of national implementation is qualitative in nature; it shows that a particular activity is either: a) implemented; b) in progress; or c) information is not applicable. The analysis was conducted as follows: First, at the National level (Table Form) to establish the status of implementation on a country-by-country basis.
Second,at the Regional level (Bar Chart) where countries were grouped into regions and the information summarized in terms of the percentage of countries in a region which have either:a) implemented a particular activity; or b) that activity is in progress. Third, the Global level (Pie Chart), where activities both implemented and in progress by a particular region have been grouped by category (e.g. Education).These are represented by pie charts where the share of a pie for each region under each issue represents the percentage of activities in that region that are implemented and/or in progress for that element or category of implementation. This report provides an analysis of the national implementation status for two of the cross-sectoral issues: combating poverty, and health at national, regional and global levels. A further seven issues, agriculture, decision-making, education, energy, freshwater, information and oceans are presented at the most aggregated, global level. The web version of the full National Implementation Report will provide all three layers of analysis of information. Issues (or groups of issues) not included in this current report are: atmosphere, biodiversity, changing consumption patterns (consumers), demographics, desertification, forests, hazardous/solid/radioactive wastes, human settlements, industry, international cooperation, land management, mountains, sustainable tourism, toxic chemicals, trade and transport. Every effort has been made to reflect, as accurately as possible, the information submitted by each country. However, occasional ambiguities and voids in the texts submitted by countries may have required that some interpretation be applied. For example, a country may have named a Coordinating Body for a specific issue in 90% of the cases. However, in 10% of the cases, no spe-
cific name is mentioned despite there being evidence of the bodys existence from the content of the text. In this and other similar cases, despite this lack of a specific name, the interpretation that has been applied is that the country indeed has a specific activity in place. A second example relates to Sustainable Development Strategies. Many countries reported having such strategies, despite the fact that only one dimension of sustainable development (e.g. the environmental aspect) was highlighted. In these cases, the National Programmes for Environment and Development, or National Environmental Action Plans that are nationally considered Sustainable Development Strategies have been reflected in this Report as such. The English translations for the 2002 Country Profiles submitted by Russian Federation and Tajikistan are not yet available. Some reporting countries have provided updated information on a few chapters thus, their other chapters may not be up-to-date. National Assessments versus Country Profiles: It should be noted that the purpose, approach, format and nature of the National Assessments, prepared by countries for the Johannesburg Summit, are distinctively different from those of the Country Profiles which formed the basis of this National Implementation of Agenda 21 report. The former exercise was intended to provide findings of the ten-year review and assessment of national implementation, often conducted through multi-stakeholders dialogues or national forums. It was focused on identifying major achievements, challenges and priorities for the future. The Country Profiles, on the other hand, provide chapter-by-chapter or issue-by-issue overview of the latest state of affairs or information.The latter uses a very standardized format.
PART I:
EXPLANATORY NOTE
AGRICULTURE
Decision-Making
Asia & Pacific 9% Europe & North America 17% Latin America & Carib. 10% Africa 7% W. Asia 2%
Education
Asia & Pacific 10% Europe & North America 14% Latin America & Carib. 8%
Africa 9%
W. Asia 2%
Information
Asia & Pacific 10% Europe & North America 15% Latin America & Carib. 8% Africa 4% W. Asia 2%
Technology
Asia & Pacific 8% Europe & North America 16% Latin America & Carib. 6% Africa 8%
Financing
Asia & Pacific 6% Europe & North America 17% Latin America & Carib. 6%
Africa 8%
W. Asia 1%
W. Asia 3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
COMBATING POVERTY
Decision-Making
Asia & Pacific 17% Europe & North America 28%
Education
Asia & Pacific 10% Europe & North America 16% Latin America & Carib. 8%
Africa 8%
W. Asia 3%
Africa 8%
W. Asia 3%
Africa 19%
Not Applicable 5%
W. Asia 4% No Info. Available Globally 12% No Info. Available Globally 57% No Info. Available Globally 55%
Cooperation
Asia & Pacific Europe & North America 15% 9% Latin America & Carib. 5% Africa 4%
W. Asia 2%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation
EXPLANATORY NOTE
10
DECISION-MAKING
Europe & North America 19% Asia & Pacific 9% Latin America & Carib. 9% Africa 10% W. Asia 3%
This Global Pie Chart represents percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress focusing on national institutions and strategies.
11
EXPLANATORY NOTE
14. Professional Training Programmes on Toxic Chemicals (Toxic Chemicals) 15. Public Awareness-Raising on Recycling (Hazardous, Solid and Radio Active Wastes)
12
EDUCATION
Africa 7%
Not Applicable 1%
W. Asia 2%
This Global Pie Chart represents percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress based on sectoral perspectives.
13
EXPLANATORY NOTE
14
ENERGY
Decision-Making
Asia & Pacific Europe & North America 4% 8% Latin America & Carib. 3% Africa 4% Africa 5% W. Asia 2%
Information
Asia & Pacific 7% Europe & North America 16% Latin America & Carib. 4%
W. Asia 2%
W. Asia 1%
Technology
Asia & Pacific 11% Europe & North America 18% Latin America & Carib. 7% Africa 4% Africa 9%
Financing
Asia & Pacific 7% Europe & North America 15% Latin America & Carib. 4% W. Asia 2%
W. Asia 3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
15
EXPLANATORY NOTE
16
FRESHWATER
Decision-Making
Asia & Pacific 9% Europe & North America 16% Latin America & Carib. 10%
Education
Europe & North America 7% Asia & Pacific Latin America & Carib. 7% 8%
Africa 8%
W. Asia 3%
W. Asia 3%
Africa 7%
W. Asia 3%
Information
Europe & North America 19% Asia & Pacific 11% Latin America & Carib. 9%
Financing
Europe & North America 11% Asia & Pacific Latin America & Carib. 4% 5% Africa 4% W. Asia 3% Africa 6%
Cooperation
Asia & Pacific 7% Europe & North America 14% Latin America & Carib. 11%
Africa 7%
W. Asia 2%
W. Asia 3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
17
EXPLANATORY NOTE
18
HE ALTH
Decision-Making
Asia & Pacific 8% Europe & North America 16% Latin America & Carib. 7% Africa 9% W. Asia 2%
P
Education
Asia & Pacific Europe & North America 14% 8% Latin America & Carib. 7%
Africa 8%
W. Asia 3%
Cooperation
Asia & Pacific 9% Europe & North America 15% Latin America & Carib. 7%
Africa 5%
W. Asia 3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
19
EXPLANATORY NOTE
20
INFORMATION
Asia & Pacific 8% Europe & North America 15% Latin America & Carib. 5%
W. Asia 2%
This Global Pie Chart represents percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress based on sectoral perspectives.
21
EXPLANATORY NOTE
22
OCE ANS
Decision-Making
Asia & Pacific 7% Africa 7% Europe & North America 14% Latin America & Carib. 8%
Information
Asia & Pacific 9% Europe & North America 14% Latin America & Carib. 6%
pplicable 8%
W. Asia 3%
W. Asia 3%
Not Applicable 8%
W. Asia 3%
Technology
Asia & Pacific 9% Europe & North America 14% Latin America & Carib. Africa 6% 6%
Not Applicable 8%
W. Asia 3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
23
PART II:
25
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 53
90%
48
80%
42
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
70%
37
60%
32
50%
27
40%
21
30%
16
20%
11
10%
0%
om
ng
p.
Pa
of
Pa
ci
1.
si
of
In
ci
rti
p.
di
ci
Lo
p.
d or
no
Se
ca
.B
us
lA
cu
y od
of
ge
Pa
7.
4.
ra nf
rti
st
5.
6.
2.
ci
ru
p.
rti
u ct
ou
rti
re
&
r Se
vi
ut
es om en
Pr
. og in an a ci
lP
. og pl oy m en
tO
. pp to s Ba ic
. du ra l s As is
ta
e nc
en
P.
h.
of
rit
d .A
va
e nc
3.
Pa
en
f to
F 9.
10
m .E
A 1.
cc
s es
12
/M Bi
ul
a til
te
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
IN PROGRESS
26
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
14 15 16 17 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
COUNTRIES
Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cote d'Ivoire
Decision-Making
COMBATING POVERTY
27
6. Housing Security Programmes for the Poor 7. Improvement of Infrastructure & Services
Programmes & Projects
Education
Cooperation
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Morocco Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa Sudan Swaziland Togo Tunisia Uganda United Rep. of Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS
10 9 19% 17%
1 5 2% 9%
3 8 6% 15%
2 5 4% 9%
2 9 4% 17%
8 7 15% 13%
12 7 23% 13%
4 8 8% 15%
6 9 11% 17%
6 11 11% 21%
7 8 13% 15%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
28
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 44
91%
40
82% 73%
36 32
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
64%
28
55%
24
45%
20
36%
16
27% 18%
12 8
9%
0%
lA
0
N
ng
p.
Pa
of
Pa
ci
1.
si
of
In
ci
rti
p.
di
ci
oo
of
ge
of
Lo
. rd
no
Se
Bo
rit
ut
om
us
dy
Pa
7.
4.
ra nf
rti
st
5.
6.
2.
ci
ru
p.
rti
u ct
ou
rti
re
&
p.
r Se
vi
cu
es om en
Pr
g. na n a ci lP
. og pl oy m t en
p. Ba c si
Ed
u. al s As is
ta
ce
en
P.
h.
ca
d .A
va
m ce
en
W of
i .F
3.
Pa
10
Em
A 1.
cc
s es
to
12
/M Bi
ul
t ila
er
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
29
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
20 21 22 23 24 25 Maldives Marshall Islands Micronesia Mongolia Myanmar Nauru Afghanistan Australia Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Cyprus Fiji India Indonesia Iran Japan Kazakhstan
15 16 17 18 19
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
26 Nepal
COUNTRIES
Decision-Making
COMBATING POVERTY
30
6. Housing Security Programmes for the Poor 7. Improvement of Infrastructure & Services
Programmes & Projects
Education
Cooperation
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 New Zealand Pakistan Palau Papua New Guinea Philippines Republic of Korea Samoa Singapore Solomon Islands Sri Lanka Tajikistan* Thailand Tonga Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uzbekistan Vanuatu Viet Nam TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS % NOT APPLICABLE
19 0 0 43% 0% 0%
7 0 0 16% 0% 0%
11 0 0 25% 0% 0%
0 0 2 0% 0% 5%
11 0 0 25% 0% 0%
22 0 0 50% 0% 0%
23 0 0 52% 0% 0%
14 0 0 32% 0% 0%
19 0 0 43% 0% 0%
17 1 0 39% 2% 0%
18 1 0 41% 2% 0%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
31
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 48
83%
40
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
67%
32
50%
24
33%
16
17%
0%
om
ng
p.
Pa
of
Pa
ci
p.
1.
si
of
In
ci
rti
p.
di
ci
Lo
p.
d or
no
Se
ca
.B
us
lA
cu
y od
of
ge
Pa
Pa
7.
4.
In
3.
fra
rti
st
5.
6.
2.
ci
rti
t uc
ur
ou
rti
&
Se
rv
s ce W om en
Pr
. og in an a ci
lP
ut
. og pl o ym en
tO
. pp to s Ba ic
. du ra l s As is
ta
e nc
en
P.
h.
of
rit
8.
v Ad
an
m ce
en
f to
F 9.
10
Em
11
c .A
s es
12
.B
i/M
ul
til
e at
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
32
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
19 20 21 22 23 Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany
14 15 16 17 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
COUNTRIES
1. Coordinating Body on Combating Poverty
2. Participation of Women in DecisionMaking Decision-Making 3. Participation of Local Authorities in Decision-Making 4. Participation of Indigenous People in Decision-Making
Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czech Republic Denmark
COMBATING POVERTY
33
6. Housing Security Programmes for the Poor 7. Improvement of Infrastructure & Services
Programmes & Projects
Education
Cooperation
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Luxembourg Malta Monaco Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation* San Marino Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland The FYR of Macedonia Turkey Ukraine
46 United Kingdom 47 United States of America 48 Yugoslavia, Fed. Rep. Of TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS % NOT APPLICABLE
30 0 0 63% 0% 0%
8 1 0 17% 2% 0%
12 4 0 25% 8% 0%
1 2 15 2% 4% 31%
18 3 0 38% 6% 0%
21 3 0 44% 6% 0%
30 7 0 63% 15% 0%
20 6 0 42% 13% 0%
26 3 0 54% 6% 0%
22 3 0 46% 6% 0%
28 2 0 58% 4% 0%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
34
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 33
91%
30
82%
27
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
73%
24
64%
21
55%
18
45%
15
36%
12
27%
18%
9%
0%
om
ng
p.
Pa
of
Pa
ci
1.
si
of
In
ci
rti
p.
di
ci
Lo
p.
d or
no
Se
ca
.B
us
lA
cu
y od
of
ge
Pa
7.
4.
ra nf
rti
st
5.
6.
2.
ci
ru
p.
rti
u ct
ou
rti
re
&
Se
rv
ic
ut
es om en
Pr
. og in an a ci
lP
. og pl oy m en
tO
. pp to s Ba ic
. du ra l s As is
ta
e nc
en
P.
h.
of
rit
d .A
va
e nc
3.
Pa
en
f to
F 9.
10
Em
A 1.
cc
s es
12
/M Bi
ul
a til
te
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
35
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
16 17 18 19 20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
26 Peru Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador
21 Jamaica 22 Mexico
COUNTRIES
1. Coordinating Body on Combating Poverty
2. Participation of Women in DecisionMaking Decision-Making 3. Participation of Local Authorities in Decision-Making 4. Participation of Indigenous People in Decision-Making
COMBATING POVERTY
36
6. Housing Security Programmes for the Poor 7. Improvement of Infrastructure & Services
Programmes & Projects
Education
Cooperation
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 St.Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St Vincent & the Grenad. Suriname Trinidad and Tobago Uruguay Venezuela TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS % NOT APPLICABLE
11 0 0 33% 0% 0%
6 1 0 18% 3% 0%
11 0 0 33% 0% 0%
4 1 2 12% 3% 6%
9 1 0 27% 3% 0%
6 5 0 18% 15% 0%
10 6 0 30% 18% 0%
5 6 0 15% 18% 0%
8 6 0 24% 18% 0%
4 9 0 12% 27% 0%
11 5 0 33% 15% 0%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
37
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 12
83%
10
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
67%
50%
33%
17%
0%
lA
0
N
ng
p.
Pa
of
Pa
ci
p.
1.
si
of
In
ci
rti
p.
di
ci
oo
ge
of
of
Lo
. rd
no
Se
Bo
rit
ut
om
us
dy
Pa
7.
4.
ra nf
rti
st
5.
6.
2.
ci
rti
uc
r tu
ou
rti
&
p.
r Se
vi
cu
es om en
Pr
g. na nc l ia
en
Pr
g. oy m en tO
p. B i as c
Ed
u. al s As is
ta
ce
P.
h.
ca
d .A
va
m ce
en
W of
i .F
3.
Pa
10
Em
pl
A 1.
cc
s es
to
12
/M Bi
ul
t ila
er
IMPLEMENTED IN PROGRESS
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
NOT APPLICABLE
38
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
COMBATING POVERTY
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
COUNTRIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Bahrain Iraq Israel Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic United Arab Emirates Yemen TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS % NOT APPLICABLE
4 1 0 33% 8% 0%
0 2 0 0% 17% 0%
0 2 0 0% 17% 0%
0 1 1 0% 8% 8%
1 1 0 8% 8% 0%
3 2 0 25% 17% 0%
2 4 0 17% 33% 0%
4 4 0 33% 33% 0%
1 3 0 8% 25% 0%
1 5 0 8% 42% 0%
3 2 0 25% 17% 0%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
39
HE ALTH
100% 53
90%
48
80%
42
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
60%
32
50%
27
40%
21
30%
16
20%
11
10%
0%
og te
ea
at e
rti
al /M
4.
2.
ily
Ba
C 1.
an
Pa
IV
d or
lth
rn al
St
ng
p.
.B
Pr
-n at
6. P
r .P
Fa
re
im
ry
si
/M
Pl
at
er
ci
ni
l na
ra
ar
ar
dy
of
re ut rit i on
Pr
. og C on l tro
Pr
. og ic bl Aw ar
en
ss lA i ss st
an
ce
gy
.N
5.
.D
is
3.
ea
se
9.
Pu
10
.B
i/M
ul
til
e at
ra
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
IN PROGRESS
40
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
70%
37
HE ALTH
Decision-Making Programmes and & Projects Education Cooperation
COUNTRIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cote d'Ivoire Dem. Rep. of the Congo Djibouti Egypt Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya
26 Lesotho
41
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Morocco Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa Sudan Swaziland Togo Tunisia Uganda United Rep. of Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS
19 1 36% 2%
1 8 2% 15%
9 10 17% 19%
10 6 19% 11%
11 9 21% 17%
10 8 19% 15%
6 8 11% 15%
11 9 21% 17%
6 11 11% 21%
8 1 15% 2%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
42
7. Nutrition Programmes
HE ALTH
100% 44
91%
40
82%
36
73%
32
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
64%
28
55%
24
45%
20
36%
16
27%
12
18%
9%
0%
te
rn al C
ea
at e
rti
4.
re -n at a
2.
Ba
ily
1.
Pa
l/M
Pl
an
IV
d or
lth
St
ng
p.
.B
Pr
y od
ci
Fa
P 6.
rim
/ ry
si
at
ni
a rn
lC
e ar ut ri n tio
ra
of
Pr
. og C on tro
lP
. og ic Aw ar
og
en
ar
ar
ss l s As is
ta
e nc
gy
N 7.
6. P
D 8.
is
3.
e as
u .P
bl
10
/M Bi
ul
a til
te
ra
5.
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
IN PROGRESS
43
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
HE ALTH
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
COUNTRIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Afghanistan Australia Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Cyprus Fiji India Indonesia Iran Japan Kazakhstan Kiribati Korea, DPR of Kyrgyzstan Lao, People's Dem. Rep. Malaysia Maldives Marshall Islands Micronesia Mongolia Myanmar Nauru
26 Nepal
44
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 New Zealand Pakistan Palau Papua New Guinea Philippines Republic of Korea Samoa Singapore Solomon Islands Sri Lanka Tajikistan* Thailand Tonga Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uzbekistan Vanuatu Viet Nam TOTAL IN EXISTENCE IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS IMPLEMENTED % IN EXISTENCE % IN PROGRESS
21 0 48% 0%
8 0 18% 0%
20 2 45% 5%
16 0 36% 0%
20 0 45% 0%
17 0 39% 0%
12 0 27% 0%
20 0 45% 0%
16 0 36% 0%
17 0 39% 0%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
45
7. Nutrition Programmes
HE ALTH
100% 48
83%
40
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
67%
32
50%
24
33%
16
17%
0%
og te
ea
at e
rti
al /M
4.
2.
ily
Ba
1.
Pa
Pl
an
IV
d or
rn al
lth
St
ng
p.
.B
Pr
ar
ar
dy
ci
-n at
6. P
r .P
Fa
re
im
ar
M y/
at
n er
al
ra
of
re ut r o iti n
Pr
g. o ro nt lP
ro
g. Aw ar
en
ss al s As is
ta
ce
gy
ni
.N
D 8.
is
3.
ea
se
9.
l ub
si
ic
10
/M Bi
ul
t ila
er
5.
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
IN PROGRESS
46
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
HE ALTH
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
COUNTRIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein
26 Lithuania
47
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Luxembourg Malta Monaco Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation* San Marino Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland The FYR of Macedonia Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom United States of America Yugoslavia, Fed. Rep. Of TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS
36 0 75% 0%
20 5 42% 10%
28 9 58% 19%
20 2 42% 4%
12 5 25% 10%
26 7 54% 15%
11 5 23% 10%
25 7 52% 15%
23 4 48% 8%
29 0 60% 0%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
48
7. Nutrition Programmes
HE ALTH
100% 33
91%
30
82%
27
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
73%
24
64%
21
55%
18
45%
15
36%
12
27%
18%
9%
0%
og
rn al C
at e
rti
4.
na ta
2.
ily
Ba
C 1.
an
Pa
oo
ea
ci
ni
. rd
ra
of
Bo
ar
ar
te
dy
p.
l/M
6.
r .P
Fa
Pr
im
ry
si
/M
Pl
at
IV
er
l na
Pr
re ut rit i on
lth
St
ng
Pr
. og C on l tro
Pr
. og ic bl Aw ar
en
ss lA i ss st
an
ce
gy
.N
5.
.D
is
3.
e-
ea
se
9.
Pu
10
.B
i/M
ul
til
e at
ra
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
IN PROGRESS
49
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
HE ALTH
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
COUNTRIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Nicaragua Panama
25 Paraguay 26 Peru
50
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Education
Cooperation
COUNTRIES
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 St.Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St Vincent & the Grenad. Suriname Trinidad and Tobago Uruguay Venezuela TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS
18 1 55% 3%
7 2 21% 6%
11 6 33% 18%
7 5 21% 15%
11 1 33% 3%
12 6 36% 18%
5 3 15% 9%
13 4 39% 12%
10 4 30% 12%
12 2 36% 6%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
51
7. Nutrition Programmes
HE ALTH
100% 12
83%
10
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
67%
50%
33%
17%
0%
og
rti
4.
2.
at a
ily
Ba
C 1.
an
at
Pa
oo
er n
ea
ci
ni
. rd
al C
ra
of
Bo
ar e
ar
te
dy
p.
Fa
en
6.
r .P
im
ry
si
/M
l/M
Pl
at
IV
er
l na
Pr
re ut rit i on
lth
St
ng
Pr
. og C on l tro
Pr
. og ic bl Aw ar
en
ss lA i ss st
an
ce
gy
.N
5.
.D
is
3.
ea
se
9.
Pu
10
.B
i/M
Pr
ul
til
e at
ra
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
IN PROGRESS
52
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
HE ALTH
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
COUNTRIES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Bahrain Iraq Israel Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic United Arab Emirates Yemen TOTAL IMPLEMENTED TOTAL IN PROGRESS % IMPLEMENTED % IN PROGRESS
6 0 50% 0%
0 2 0% 17%
2 3 17% 25%
0 1 0% 8%
0 1 0% 8%
3 3 25% 25%
0 3 0% 25%
5 1 42% 8%
2 3 17% 25%
42% 8%
Bold= Reporting country submitted 2002 Country Profile. Regular=Reporting country yet to submit 2002 Country Profile. Italics =Non-Reporting Country
53
7. Nutrition Programmes
ANNE XES
55
ANNEX I.
130 120
60%
110 100
es
2.
1.
lim
Bi
at
er
i od
os
4.
tif
ve
Ky
IT
af
ha
rs
et
ot
ng
io
ity
Bi
7.
6.
on
ic
tr
l ea
B 8.
l se w La o h ft
ea 10 .W et
la
ds o en us Pe
op
es of t he C
ild
3.
9.
11
n .I
di
5.
12
.R
ig
s ht
56
70%
ANNEX I.
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
1. Biodiversity Convention
COUNTRIES
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua & Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia & Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada
57
6. CITES Convention
2. Biosafety Protocol
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
3. Climate Change Convention 5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
COUNTRIES
Canada Cape Verde Central African Rep. Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Costa Rica Cote D'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic D. R. of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic DPR of Korea Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana
58
6. CITES Convention
2. Biosafety Protocol
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
3. Climate Change Convention 5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
COUNTRIES
Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Rep. of) Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao P.D. Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi
59
6. CITES Convention
2. Biosafety Protocol
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
3. Climate Change Convention 5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
COUNTRIES
Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Monaco Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Republic of Korea Republic of Moldova
60
6. CITES Convention
2. Biosafety Protocol
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
3. Climate Change Convention 5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
COUNTRIES
Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Samoa San Marino Sao Tome & Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent & the Gren. Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Rep. Tajikistan Thailand The FYR of Macedonia Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Tuvalu
61
6. CITES Convention
2. Biosafety Protocol
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
3. Climate Change Convention 5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
COUNTRIES
Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United Rep of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Yemen Yugoslavia Zambia Zimbabwe TOTALS: As % of total:
180 95%
19 10%
183 96%
71 37%
176 93%
158 83%
183 96%
151 79%
136 72%
131 69%
15 8%
188 99%
62
6. CITES Convention
2. Biosafety Protocol
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
OFFICIAL CONVENTION NAMES AND SOURCES: Biodiversity Convention = Convention on Biological Diversity Biosafety Protocol = Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity Climate Change Convention = United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Kyoto Protocol = Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Convention on Climate Change Desertification Convention = United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification Particularly Africa CITES Convention = Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora Montreal Protocol = Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer Basel Convention = Basel Convention to the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes Law of the Sea = United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Wetlands Convention = Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Indigenous Peoples = Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention Rights of the Child = Convention on the Rights of the Child UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
UNEP, CITES Secretariat UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section The Ramsar Secretariat, The World Conservation Union International Labour Organization UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
63
ANNEX II.
3. List of non-reporting countries to the CSD: Afghanistan, Andorra, Angola, Azerbaijan, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Cyprus, Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominica, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Kiribati, Kuwait, Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia (Federated States of), Mozambique, Nauru, Oman, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Sudan, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, United Arab Emirates, Vanuatu, Yemen, and Zambia. Total 60
2. List of reporting countries to the CSD that are yet to submit their 2002 Country Profiles: Albania, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Australia, Bahamas, Bahrain, Belarus, Bolivia, Brunei Darussalam, Cameroon, Canada, China, Costa Rica, Cte dIvoire, Dominican Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Germany, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, India, Iraq, Ireland, Jamaica, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mongolia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, Panama, Qatar, Republic of Moldova, Sao Tom and Principe, South Africa, Suriname, Swaziland, Switzerland, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,Tonga, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Viet Nam, Yugoslavia, and Zimbabwe. Total 51
64
Cover, back and inside illustrations courtesy of the United Nations Postal Administration: http://www.un.org/Depts/UNPA