Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Switzerland was the 14th largest DAC donor of humanitarian aid by volume in 2007. CHF ERF
Its bilateral and multilateral contributions totalled US$ 192 million – or 2.2% of
US$m 20 8 0 0 164 192
the collective DAC total. Total humanitarian assistance expenditure fell by 8.0%
% total 10.5% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 85.2% 100.0%
between 2006 and 2007. Preliminary DAC data suggests that bilateral contributions
could reach US$174 million in 2008. CHFs in 2007 relate to DRC and Sudan. The ERFs included in the data reported here are CAR, Ethiopia, Iraq, Somalia and Zimbabwe
79
Affairs. It focuses on four key components: prevention, emergency aid, reconstruction CAP appeal recipient, accounting
80 for 3.0% of Swiss reported
and advocacy.
70
expenditure through the FTS Switzerland’s total official
The Swiss Confederation’s Humanitarian Aid Strategy for 2005, ‘Solidarity Alive’, is in 2007
30
US$26
Amount contributed by each
19
www.deza.admin.ch/ressources/resource_en_153478.pdf 20
Imputed CERF
Swiss citizen to total official
6
www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/59/35297586.pdf
7
7
10
5
5
5
5
4
Total official humanitarian
0
assistance allocable by country humanitarian assistance, 2007
Other countries
Palestinian Adm. Areas
Sudan
Liberia
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Afghanistan
Jordan
Sri Lanka
Lebanon
Pakistan
Colombia
Switzerland’s total official humanitarian assistance expenditure
2000-2008
-8.0%
Switzerland is the 12th largest
contributor to the CERF. In
Change in Switzerland’s
Total official humanitarian 2007, its US$8m accounted total official humanitarian
expenditure
for 4.3% of its total official
humanitarian expenditure
expenditure, 2006–2007
Multilateral (UN agencies)
Bilateral
US$ million (constant 2007 prices)
209
250
192
195
197
183
187
0
Outside the CAP
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
(prelim)
87.8%
Data notes
Switzerland spent US$37m on 18
consolidated and flash appeals in
Switzerland’s humanitarian expenditure, 2008 – this expenditure (referred to Although both relate to ‘humanitarian’
reported through the FTS, 2006-2008 as ‘inside the CAP’) was equivalent expenditure, FTS and DAC data are not
to 18.9% of its bilateral humanitarian comparable. Reporting requirements and
See Data notes definitions are different. Some, all or none of a
expenditure in 2008
DAC donor’s official humanitarian expenditure
might be included in the FTS figures. In some
Top recipients of Switzerland’s flash and
instances, more might be reported in
264
300 consolidated appeal funding, 2008 humanitarian assistance through the FTS than
217
200
US$ million
contributions to UN flash and consolidated Sudan 4.3% based on OECD DAC data (DAC1, 2a and CRS),
150 appeal funding in 2008, accounting for Palestinian territory, occupied 2.9% downloaded in April 2009. The data for 2008 is
17.2% of US$37m funding ‘inside the West Africa 2.9% preliminary and relates to bilateral humanitarian
100 CAP’ (or 4.3% of the total reported by Chad 2.2%
aid only. Full and final official data for 2008 will
239 191 111 Switzerland through the FTS)
Somalia 2.2%
be published by the DAC in December 2009
50 Democratic Republic of Congo 2.1%
25 26 37 Zimbabwe 1.5%
Outside the CAP
0 Total reported through the FTS Uganda 1.1% FTS data is published in real time on ReliefWeb
Georgia 1.1% 75.0% and was downloaded in April 2009.
2006
2007
2008
Other funding (‘outside the CAP’) Myanmar 1.1% Supplementary data on CERF and pooled funding
Other appeals inside the CAP 3.6%
was downloaded from their respective sites
UN flash and consolidated
appeal funding (‘inside the CAP’)
May/June 2009