Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

As seen through the pages of Swazi Media Commentary

Volume 9: September 2013

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

INTRODUCTION
The Swazi people went to the polls this month to select 55 members of the House of Assembly, but more than a week after the vote the Swaziland Elections and Boundaries Commission has failed to publish the full results, or the final voter turnout. This has added further controversy in an already discredited political system. A campaign to boycott the election because political parties are banned from taking part and the parliament that is elected has no power because King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch may have been successful, but we are unable to tell because the results have been withheld. Swazi Media Commentary reported and analysed the election and presents this as part of a digest of the happenings in Swaziland in September 2013 in the latest of its monthly compilations. Apart from the election, September saw the annual Global Week of Action for Democracy in Swaziland. As usual, police and state security forces clamped down on any public discussion of the need for democracy in the kingdom. A panel of trade union experts, formed to discuss workers conditions in Swaziland, was forced to disband after police arrested and deported many of its participants, including the former South African cabinet minister Jay Naidoo. While all this was happening King Mswati said he had a vision (it is assumed from God) who told him that the system of governance in Swaziland should henceforth be called a monarchical democracy. This caused great excitement among the media in Swaziland, which claimed a new dawn in democracy. It took the international news agency Reuters to get the king to admit that his new democracy was just a different name for that which already existed. It was also announced that the 45-year-old king was to take an 18-year-old beauty pageant contestant as his new bride (believed to be wife number 14, but nobody is quite sure). International media pointed out the teenager had a past and had previously dated two of the kings sons and dubbed her naughty Sindi. Media in Swaziland, which see the marriage as a fairy story, ignored this inconvenience. Swazi Media Commentary has no physical base and is completely independent of any political faction and receives no income from any individual or organisation. People who contribute ideas or write for it do so as volunteers and receive no payment. Swazi Media Commentary is published online updated most days bringing information, comment and analysis in support of democracy in the kingdom.

Page 1

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

CONTENTS

1 2 3 4 5 6

Elections Global Week of Action King Mswati III Human Rights Media Reed Dance

3 15 19 27 28 31

Page 2

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

1. ELECTION
Party ban cuts people off from election 9 September 2013 Fewer people are taking part in Swazilands national election because political parties are banned, an international think-tank has reported. The lack of political parties in the kingdom, where King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, is part of a flawed election process, Chatham House, UK, reported. [T]his is a restriction on both freedom of association and the ability to challenge government as an organized group in an open electoral process. This has resulted in falling voter registrations and extended registration periods, indicating a domestic disengagement from the process, it said in a report called, Swaziland: Southern Africas Forgotten Crisis. The report said at the last election in 2008, 350,778 Swazis registered to vote but only 189,559 participated in the polls i.e. fewer than half of those eligible to vote actually did so. Turnout in 2003 was 57.9 per cent of registered voters; it was 60.4 per cent in 1998 and 61 percent in 1993. Voter registration for the 2013 elections has been low. With only 20 days to go before the registration deadline, just 190,000 people had signed up to vote, and two days before the 23 June deadline registration had reached only 344,679 out of an estimated 600,000 possible voters. The low take-up prompted the king to extend the registration period by a week, by the end of which the final registration was 415,012. Looking forward to the next election due on 20 September 2013, the report authored by Christopher Vandome, Alex Vines and Markus Weimer, said international observers at the poll must not be quick to declare it free and fair. Previously, Southern African Development Community (SADC) observer teams have validated election results on the basis that they have been in accordance with domestic law, without questioning the legitimacy of such law or whether its processes lie within SADCapproved definitions of what democracy is and what it wants national representation to be. In contrast, Commonwealth observers have at previous elections highlighted shortcomi ngs and made recommendations for future conduct. Power in Swaziland rests with the monarchy. The king has a tight grip on power, through his power of royal assent, Swaziland has a House of Assembly of 65 members, of whom 55 are indirectly elected/selected under the Tinkhundla system and 10 appointed by the king. There is a more powerful Senate of 30 members, 20 appointed by the king and 10 by the House of Assembly, the report said.

Page 3

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom It added, The new constitution of 8 February 2006 entrenches the absolute powers of the monarch, although it removes his right to rule by decree and arguably allows for the existence of political parties. The king is immune from the courts of law, and retains ultimate judicial, executive and legislative powers. He may veto legislation and dissolve parliament at will. He selects chiefs, judges, the Judicial Services Commission (which oversees the appointment and removal of judges) and the Supreme Council of State. The report added, that on 3 October 2012 the House of Assembly, in an unusual act of independence, passed a vote of no confidence in the kingdoms prime minister and government. According to the countrys constitution, the prime minister was required to submit his resignation within three days of the vote of no confidence. However, he simply refused to step down, prompting a political crisis. The king, who is mandated by law to remove the prime minister directly following a vote of no confidence, also refused to dismiss the government. The attorney-general advised that the vote was null and void, although parliament continued to support its resolution. The issue was also referred to the kings advisory council (Liqoqo). On 15 October 2012 a vote to repeal the previous vote of no confidence was passed in the House of Assembly with only 32 of its 65 members present.

All not well ahead of elections 13 September 2013 King Mswati III is trying to convince the international community that all is well ahead of next weeks national election in Swaziland. He said the election organiser, the Elections and Boundaries Commission (EBC), had solved all the problems from the primary elections last month. He made his comments when he received letters of credence from the Ambassador of the Republic of China on Taiwan to Swaziland Thomas Chen and Italian Ambassador to Swaziland Roberto Vellano at the Lozitha Palace. King Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, is keen for the international community to believe that the elections are democratic. He told the ambassadors that the elections were where the country elects a new government. The Times of Swaziland, the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom, reported, He said the participation of people during the elections was very vital because it means they are able to shape the countrys future choosing a new government. But this is not true. The Swazi people are only allowed to select individuals to sit in the House of Assembly. Political parties are banned from taking part in the elections and there is no debate on policy.

Page 4

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom The people only select 55 members of the House of Assembly. The other 10 in the 65-strong house are chosen by the king. None of the 30 members of the Senate House are elected by the people. The King choses 20, and the other 10 are elected by members of the House of assembly. After the election, the king will choose a prime minister and government ministers. The Swazi parliament has no powers and the king can overrule any decision it makes if he wishes. King Mswati also told the ambassadors that the primary elections, where the candidates for next weeks election were chosen went extremely well. However , the evidence contradicts this. There were many complaints made to the EBC about vote-buying and other irregularities. A number of complaints are to be heard by the Swaziland High Court ahead of the poll on 20 September 2013. See also ELECTION CREDIBILITY AT ROCK BOTTOM

Sedition charge for anti-poll activist 16 September 2013 Musa Dube, deputy general secretary of the Communist Party of Swaziland (CPS), has been arrested and charged with sedition for campaigning for a boycott of the elections to be held this week in the kingdom. In a statement, the CPS said, Our comrade was conducting campaign work to promote the message that the only elections that should be held in Swaziland are free and fair ones, where all political parties are able to take part on whatever platform they want. Dube reportedly was taken to the Manzini Police Station and is expected to appear in court later this week. The CPS said Dube and another activist had been shadowed by police for days before the arrest. The other activist managed to escape arrest. Dube allegedly had a PUDEMO (Peoples United Democratic Movement) t-shirt in his possession at the time of his arrest. Police and security forces in Swaziland, where King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, have clamped down on all opposition to the election due on 20 September 2013. Last week the Swaziland Police National Commissioner Issac Magagula claimed that anarchists were intent on undermining the election. Political parties are banned from taking part in the election and the CPS and PUDEMO are banned as terrorist organisations in Swaziland.

Page 5

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom Anger at pre-election arrest 17 September 2013 Musa Dube, deputy general secretary of the Communist Party of Swaziland, has been remanded in custody on sedition charges for allegedly distributing leaflets calling for a boycott of the kingdoms election. He is charged with two counts of possessing and distributing leaflets published by the CPS at Kakhoza in Manzini. He appeared in Manzini Magistrates Court on Monday and was remanded to Zakhele Remand Centre and is due to reappear on 25 September 2013, pending committal to the High Court. An application for bail is expected to be lodged. National elections take place in Swaziland, which is ruled by King Mswati III, sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, on Friday 20 September. All political parties are banned from taking part. Prodemocracy organisations have accused the Swazi state of intimidating Dube and others who are calling for democracy in Swaziland. The Peoples United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO), the best-known opposition group in Swaziland, in a statement said, Together with the CPS and other political parties, joined by faith based, students and labour organisations we are calling for the rejections of these sham elections whose outcome is predetermined and will not change the rotten political system called Tinkhundla. Under Tinkhundla people are only allowed to stand for election as individuals. No government is elected by the people this is chosen by King Mswati. At the election on Friday only 55 members of the 65-strong House of Assembly will be selected. The other ten will be appointed by the king. The king appoints 20 members of the Swazi Senate, the other 10 are chosen by the House of Assembly and none are elected by the people.

Ten reasons why election is not credible 19 September 2013 As Swaziland goes to the polls on Friday (20 September 2013), King Mswati IIIs propaganda machine is working at full throttle to mislead people inside and outside the kingdom that the election is credible. Top of the propagandists agenda is to try to fool people that the election is to choose a new government. It is not. The elections have no real purpose other than to give King Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, a fig leaf of democracy. Here are 10 reasons why the election in Swaziland should not be considered credible.

Page 6

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

1. Political parties are banned from taking part in the election so no debate is possible about alternative policies being pursued by the outgoing government. 2. The election is only for 55 of the 65-member House of Assembly. The other ten members are appointed by King Mswati III. No members of the 30-strong Swaziland Senate are elected; 20 are appointed by the king and 10 are selected by the House of Assembly. 3.The people do not elect a government. The Prime Minister and Cabinet ministers are appointed by the King. The outgoing PM Barnabas Dlamini was appointed by the king in contravention of the constitution. He has never been elected to political office. 4. Only a man with the surname Dlamini can, by tradition, be appointed as Prime Minister. The king is a Dlamini. 5. The Swazi Parliament has no powers. King Mswati can, and does, overrule decisions he does not like. This was the case in October 2012 when the king refused to accept a vote of no confidence passed by the House of Assembly on his government, even though he was obliged by the constitution to do so. 6. Nominations for the primary elections were marred by allegations of interference by chiefs, who represent King Mswati. Some women were barred from taking part in the nomination process because they were wearing trousers. 7. Complaints were aired in local newspapers that some people who wished to be nominated were prevented from doing so illegally by nominating officers. 8. Candidates in the primary election were barred by law fromcampaigning, so voters had no way of questioning and challenging candidates about what they would do if elected. 9. the secondary election to take place on 20 September 2013 follows a primary election process that was flawed. Numerous cases are pending at the High Court alleging election malpractice. 10 The Elections and Boundaries Commission (EBC) received many complaints following the primary election. These include the buying of votes; polling stations either open for too many hours (or too few) and people being turned away from polling stations.

See also THE CASE FOR POLITICAL PARTIES SWAZI ELECTION WILL BE A FRAUD

No debate ahead of polls observers 19 September 2013 People in Swaziland have been prevented from freely discussing issues in the run up to the election held on Friday (20 September 2013), a report from polling observers said.

Page 7

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

Civil society meetings were crushed, including prayer meetings, according to the NGOs Election Network which operates under the Swazi-based Coordinating Assembly of Nongovernmental Organisations (CANGO). With no enjoyment of the rights to access information and also exchange information, freedom to associate, freedom of movement and freedom of speech it has become difficult for cit izens to canvass issues, CANGO said in its Primary Elections Monitoring Report. The CANGO election observers reported a number of problems with the primary elections held on 24 August. Some polling stations opened late. Some ballot papers got finished and had to be fetched at Nkhanani and by the time ballot papers were made available some voters had already left. It added, The voters roll was not user-friendly, some pictures were not easy to identify. The polling stations were not adequately announced for easy access. Transport was also a challenge. The lines were long and the elderly and disabled were poorly served even though attempts were made to meet their needs. CANGO noted allegations that some voters were bribed and bussed from towns to rural constituencies. The secondary election which is for only 55 of the 65-member House of Assembly takes place on Friday (20 September 2013). Political parties are banned from taking part in the election. King Mswati III, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, selects the remaining 10 members. No members of the 30-strong Swazi Senate are elected by the people, twenty are appointed by the king and the other 10 are selected by the House of Assembly. Power stays with king worlds media 21 September 2013 The worlds media spoke with one voice on Friday (20 September 2013) as they reported on Swazilands nondemocratic election. Major news organisations including the Associated Press, AFP, BBC and al-Jazeera all reported that the elections for 55 members of the Swazi House of Assembly was irrelevant because King Mswati III, who rules his kingdom as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, will keep all the power for himself. The BBC reported, Voters in Swaziland are choosing a new parliament, even though political parties cannot take part and the king retains absolute power. The AFP news agency said the election was, dismissed by critics as a rubber stamp for King Mswati III's absolute rule. AFP quoted a recently-released report from Freedom House, a human rights group, saying, Although the Swazi government boasts trappings of a modern state. The monarch, King

Page 8

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom Mswati III, chooses and controls all significant office bearers. These must obey his commands at all times. Al-jazeera TV reported, Mswati holds ultimate sway over the government: he can veto new laws, dissolve parliament and may not be sued or charged. The Dow Jones agency called it a predetermined election. It said, Voters in Africa's last remaining absolute monarchy go to the polls to elect a new parliament Friday, and the outcome is all but assured to buttress the reigning kings rule. The Associated Press (AP) news agency quoted the Southern African Peoples Solidarity Network, a civil society group, which described the polls as a ploy to delay genuine democracy. There is no political change we can expect as a result of these elections, Dr. Collins Magalasi, general secretary of the network, told AP. The traditional system in place supports the king. Closer to home, the media in South Africa, Swazilands closest neighbour and political and economic ally, also highlighted the non-democratic nature of the election. Business Day reported, While the Swazi system of Tinkhundla allows for political parties, candidates for parliament are allowed to stand for election only in an individual capacity and are banned from campaigning. Rising pro-democracy voices are being heard on the sideline but that is where they will remain for now, as the nonparty elections will not change King Mswatis position as ruler. The Independent group of newspapers in South Africa reported, Africas only unelected national leader, King Mswati III, will remain firmly in charge whatever the outcome of Fridays parliamentary elections. The Mail and Guardian, from Johannesburg, reported, Regardless of who gets into Parliament, King Mswati III who inherited the throne from his father, King Sobhuza II, in 1986 holds all the power. The international media are unavailable to most Swazi people who are too poor to have access to them via the Internet. They are forced to rely on local media where broadcast news is under state control and one of the kingdoms only two newspaper groups is in effect owned by the king. An editorial in the Swazi Observer, the kings newspaper published on the eve of the election, said, Tomorrow presents us, Swazis, with an opportunity to put our unique democracy into full motion. The newspaper which is widely regarded as a propaganda sheet for the monarchy claimed, Tomorrow ushers in that whole new era of a new government being formed - the promise of a better Swaziland for all. The Observer also said, The eyes of the international community [will be] firmly fixed on us. In that, the newspaper was correct.

Page 9

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

Kings paper claims 97% poll turnout 21 September 2013 One of King Mswati IIIs newspapers has claimed a 97 percent voter turnout in the Swaziland election held on Friday (20 September 2013). The Weekend Observer, one of a group of newspapers in effect owned by the king, reported, about 400,000 voters braved the scorching sun and went straight to the voting centres to cast their ballots as early as possible. But, official figures from the Elections and Boundaries Commission (EBC) state that only 411,084 Swazis living in Swaziland had registered to vote. If the Weekend Observer report was correct, 97.3 percent of registered voters would have gone to the polling stations. The Weekend Observer which is widely regarded, even within Swaziland, as a propaganda sheet for the monarchy, has been talking up the success of the polling. It wrote, The nation wit nessed remarkable improvement in the national secondary elections on Friday and all credit can be given to the Elections and Boundaries Commission. The EBC, whose members were appointed by the king and is headed by one of his halfbrothers, came under intense criticism for the shambles surrounding the nomination process and the primary elections held in August. King Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, is keen to demonstrate the validity of the elections. Opposition groups called for a voter boycott because political parties were banned from taking part in the election and the parliament that is elected acts as a rubber stamp for the king. King Mswati will choose the Prime Minister and his government and is not obliged to choose people elected to parliament. It is important for King Mswati that there is a high voter turnout. At the last election in 2008 only 47.4 percent of the estimated 400,000 Swazi people eligible to vote did so. The Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (EISA) in its report on the election attributed the low turnout in 2008 to a campaign for a boycott of the election by progressives in Swaziland. It reported on the 2008 election, The best indication we have of whether the boycott was a success or not is the voter turnout rate. It added, In many ways the call by the trade unions, most of the political parties and many civil society organisations for a boycott of the election transformed the election into a referendum on the legitimacy of the new Constitution and the political order that it enshrines.

Page 10

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom EISA said, From this we may conclude that large numbers of Swazis heeded the boycott call and thereby signalled their disenchantment with the current Constitutional dispensation. A low turnout in the 2013 election would confirm that. See also SWAZIS WANT CHANGE : POLL FIGURES

No change after Swazi election 24 September 2013 Six of eight government ministers standing in the House of Assembly election in Swaziland on Friday (20 September 2013) were defeated. Of the 55 members of the House standing for re-election, 43 lost. It looks like a massive vote of no confidence in the outgoing parliament. But, who knows? It is impossible to make conclusions of these results because, in Swaziland, where King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, all public debate of politics is prohibited. Political parties are not allowed to take part in the election and any discussion prior to the poll that questioned the validity of what King Mswati and his supporters like to call Swazilands unique democracy was suppressed by police and state security forces. According to the Swaziland Constitution, all MPs are elected as individuals to serve their local constituency. This meant that at the election candidates could only make promises (many empty) about the development they would bring to their constituents if elected. There was no debate about which social, political or economic policies a new government should pursue. Voters do not choose a government: that is the prerogative of the king. He is not obliged to choose his ministers from among those people selected by his subjects. It would be no surprise when he announces his new government next month that he returns to office some of the ministers defeated at this election. Media in Swaziland, which are heavily censored, or self-censoring in favour of the monarchy, reported the election result as if it were a vote of no-confidence against the out-going government. But, they provided no evidence for this. The media in Swaziland want it both ways. On the one hand they say that under Swazilands tinkhundla system of government the people elect MPs as individuals who support their constituencies and on the other they say the people have elected a group of MPs who they believe collectively will bring them change. We do not know if the people really seek change because there is nowhere in Swaziland where they can freely debate the strengths and weaknesses of the present system of governance and discuss possible alternatives. Certainly, the media do not provide that space.

Page 11

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom No media outlet in the kingdom has suggested that if people have voted for change it might be a change in the political system and a move to democracy that they seek. What is certain is that the election will not actually bring change. In Swaziland only 55 of the 65 members of the House of Assembly are elected by the people. King Mswati appoints the other ten members. None of the 30-strong Swazi Senate is elected by the people; the king appoints 20 senators and the House of Assembly elects the other ten. Parliament has no power, it acts for King Mswati. He can and does overrule any decision parliament makes if he disagrees with it. This happened most starkly in October 2012 when the king refused to accept a vote of no confidence passed by the House of Assembly on his government, even though he was obliged by the constitution to do so. The truth is that the voters could dismiss all 55 of their elected members of the House of Assembly and replace them with 55 other individuals and nothing would change, unless the king approved and there is no reason to believe he is ready to give up his power and privileges anytime soon.

Why are full poll results not out? 25 September 2013 Voters in Swaziland still do not know the full results of last weeks election and it may be many days before they do. The Election and Boundaries Commission (EBC) says the result might be available later this week or early next. The lack of progress on releasing the details of the voting is leading to speculation that the turnout for the poll was so low; it will be an embarrassment to King Mswati III and his supporters. The EBC was quick to announce the winners of the election in each of the 55 constituencies in the election for the House of Assembly after polls closed on Friday (20 September 2013). Although it announced the winners and gave the number of votes cast for the victorious candidate, it did not publicise the number of votes cast for each of the losers. In 10 of the 55 constituencies the EBC only announced the winners name but not the number of votes he received. The EBC said privately this week it was still compiling the lists and would not be able to give details for some days. But, if the EBC knows who won at each constituency, it also knows the number of votes each losing candidate got. From there it is a small step to adding up the total number of voters across the kingdom so we can know the total turnout in the election. Either the EBC is being spectacularly incompetent or it is trying to keep back something from the Swazi people.

Page 12

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom Election coverage found wanting 28 September 2013 Newspapers in Swaziland set out to mislead their readers about the true nature of this months national election, claiming that people were voting for a government when they were not, a report just published says. And, rather than discussing issues relating to the social, political or economic policies a new government should pursue, media concentrated on trying to demonstrate the elections legitimacy. Swaziland is not a democracy and King Mswati III rules his kingdom as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch. The newspaper and broadcasting houses in Swaziland support the status-quo and it was an imperative for media to continually show support for the political system of tinkhundla / monarchical democracy, according to a report published by Swazi Media Commentary. This meant there was no debate about which social, political or economic policies a new parliament should pursue. Newspapers confused readers about the nature of the elections: constantly claiming that they were to elect a government, when they were not. King Mswat i appoints the Prime Minister and senior ministers. The report called Media Coverage of the Swaziland Election 2013 is available online. It reviews coverage by local, international and social media in the months running up to the election on 20 September 2013. Newspapers failed to cover the whole of Swaziland in the election reporting and were biased towards favoured candidates. The report is critical of the standards of journalism in Swaziland. It says media in Swaziland, are partisan, inaccurate and generally unprofessional and they are turning into an irrelevant vehicle in public discourse. Journalists lack credibility. Content in the Swazi newspaper is compromised by a lack of professionalism in writing and editing. Interesting news stories are watered down by the incomprehensible way they are written, leaving the reader confused and bewildered. Comment articles expose readers to un-researched opinion pieces that have compromised journalistic standards and some journalists willingly work as propagandists, especially at the SBIS radio. Journalists, the report says, sensationalised news and often reported as facts, pure conjecture. In contrast, the report says international news media were not very interested in covering the election, because, unlike in democracies, no power could change hands as a result of the voting. When they did report on the election they emphasised the fact that it had little meaning because the parliament that was being elected had no power. The report also looks at social media sites that were publishing information and comment in contrast to the mainstream media in Swaziland and advocating for democracy. The report

Page 13

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom concludes that social media probably had limited influence within Swaziland because only about 7 percent of the population has access to the Internet. See also SWAZILAND MEDIA NEED CODE OF CONDUCT FOR COVERING ELECTIONS THE STATE OF SWAZI JOURNALISM 2013

King Mswati III rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch

Page 14

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

2. GLOBAL WEEK OF ACTION

Democracy march: leader arrested 5 September 2013 One of Swazilands most prominent labour leaders Vincent Ncongwane was arrested today (5 September 2013) at his office by at least 10 police officers to stop him taking part in a democracy march. Reports from the kingdom say Ncongwane, who is Secretary General of the banned union federation TUCOSWA, was arrested ahead of the planned march in the Swazi capital, Mbabane. Police took him to his home where he was put under house arrest for an undetermined time. The march is part of a week of campaigning in Swaziland and abroad to draw attention to the lack of democracy and human rights in the kingdom, ruled by King Mswati III, who is subSaharan Africas last absolute monarch. Reports circulated by the Peoples United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO), a banned organisation in Swaziland, say police said the march was prohibited because TUCOSA was not an organisation recognised by the government. Political parties are not allowed to operate in Swaziland and many pro-democracy groups, including PUDEMO and the Swaziland Solidarity Network (SSN), have been prohibited as terrorist groups under the Suppression of Terrorism Act. The march was to be part of a Global Week of Action for Democracy in Swaziland. Earlier joint organisers the Swaziland National Union of Students, the Swaziland United Democratic Front (SUDF) and the Swaziland Democracy Campaign (SDC), predicted 10,000 people would take part. Prodemocracy campaigners also plan to run what is billed as a peoples summit in Manzi ni tomorrow (6 September 2013) with the intention to profile the boycott of the national socalled Tinkhundla election that will take place on 20 September. The Swazi people are not allowed to elect a full parliament. Instead, they select 55 members of the House of Assembly. The King appoints another 10 to make the total of 65 members. They cannot elect any of the 30-member Senate. The king appoints 20 of these and the other 10 are elected by members of the House of Assembly. See also MASS ACTION FOR DEMOCRACY PLANNED

Page 15

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom Mass police arrests to halt meeting 6 September 2013 Swazi police arrested all members of an international panel of experts who were due to meet today (6 September 2013) to debate the role of trade unions in Swaziland. They raided the George Hotel in Manzini where they were staying at 2am after earlier trailing them from the airport near Matsapha. The panelists were due to take evidence and then present their findings after the hearing. They were expected to highlight the role and responsibility of trade unions and civil society in fighting against the violation of fundamental rights in Swaziland. The South African trade union federation COSATU reported that the panel was to consist of Alec Muchadehama (human rights lawyer and activist from Zimbabwe), Paul Verryn (ordained minister of the Methodist Church of Southern Africa, anti-Apartheid activist and advocate for refugees in South Africa) and Nomthetho Simelane (former Lecturer in Political Science, University of Swaziland). It was to be chaired by Jay Naidoo, founding General Secretary of COSATU and former Minister of Communications for South Africa. COSATU reported, Representatives from the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) were questioned and subsequently tailed from the airport to the George Hotel in Manzini, where the panel was to meet. By 2am the place was buzzing with activity with police all over the hotel; they even asked staff about the panellists, all of whom were then arrested. The arrests followed the detention earlier yesterday (5 September 2013) of Vincent Ncongwane, Secretary General of the Swaziland labour federation TUCOSWA. He was taken by police from his office and placed under house arrest to prevent him taking part in a pro-democracy march in Mbabane, the Swazi capital. The march and the panel meeting were both parts of a Global Week of Action for Democracy in Swaziland that is presently taking place.

Police raid to stop union meeting 6 September 2013 Swaziland police and paramilitaries broke into a hotel room where an inquiry into trade union rights was taking place and ordered it to stop. The police then ordered all participants who were not Swazi subjects to leave the kingdom. The South African labour federation COSATU reported the raid happened this morning (6 September 2013) at the George Hotel in Manzini. COSATU reported the Swazi Police stopped the Chair of the inquiry, Jay Naidoo and his fellow paneliststs from proceeding with the Inquiry.

Page 16

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom It said in a statement, A contingent of Swazi police and paramilitary led by Manzini Regional Police Commander entered the hotel room where the inquiry is being held and demanded that the chair of the Inquiry, Jay Naidoo and the whole panel stop and pack all their belongings and leave Swaziland. It is expected that they shall be deported anytime soon. It added, The inquiry is an initiative of the ITUC [International Trade Union Conf ederation], TUCOSWA [Trade Union Congress of Swaziland] and COSATU to hear workers accounts of their experiences and sufferings in order compile a report to be taken to the ILO [International Labour organisation] for the Committee on the Application of International Standards. The panel was part of a Global Week of Action for Democracy in Swaziland. COSATU said the panellists were Jay Naidoo, former General Secretary of COSATU and former Minister under the Mandela Presidency; Bishop Paul Verryn of the Methodist Chruch and South African Council of Churches and anti-apartheid activist; Alec Muchadehama, Human Rights lawyer and activist from Zimbabwe; Ms Nomthetho Simelane, former lecturer of Political Science at the University of Swaziland; together with COSATU delegate Monk Molapeni. It added the raid followed the arrest at his office of the Secretary General of TUCOSWA, Vincent Ncongwane, yesterday morning by 10 police officers from the Lukhozi Serious Crime Police in Manzini. He was later placed under house arrest to prevent him taking part in a prodemocracy march in the Swaziland capital, Mbabane. COSATU said, They [police] emphasised that the reason is that TUCOSWA is banned in Swaziland and therefore an illegal entity. Various trade unions all over the world are staging activities in support of TUCOSWA and the global week of action led by the Swaziland United Democratic Front (SUDF) and its campaign wing, the Swaziland Democracy Campaign (SDC). In the UK, the TUC yesterday met the Swazi High Commission in London and raised these issues decisively, demanding the unconditional release of all those arrested and the unbanning of TUCOSWA. Police call Naidoo Panel anarchists 10 September 2013 Swazilands police chief Isaa c Magagula has accused a discussion panel led by Jay Naidoo of trying to cause anarchy and instability in the kingdom. Police, acting without warrants or a court order, broke up the meeting at the George Hotel, Manzini, last Friday (6 September 2013) and deported panel members from Swaziland.

Page 17

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom The meeting was to be a Global Inquiry Panel on trade union rights and democracy in the Swaziland, where the main workers federation and political parties are banned and King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch. The inquiry was an initiative of the International Trade Union Confederation, Trade Union Congress of Swaziland and South Africas Co ngress of South African Trade Unions to hear workers accounts of their experiences in order compile a report to be taken to the International Labour organisation for the Committee on the Application of International Standards. The panel was to be chaired by Jay Naidoo, former General Secretary of COSATU and former Minister in the South African Government under the President Nelson Mandela. Police National Commissioner Magagula told media in Swaziland, We wish to state that as far as our careful analysis of the bigger picture is concerned, the organisers are being economical with the truth in relation to the actual purpose of the meeting. This is because all factors surrounding it suggest that it was not merely intended to discuss bread and butter issues for workers, but it was part and parcel of a broader agenda to further ulterior political motives aimed at breaching the peace and causing anarchy and instability in the country. The Times of Swaziland, the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom, reported, He said it was striking that the Global Inquiry Panel had attributes of the Global Week of Action on Democracy in Swaziland. He said the Global Week of Action on Swaziland was conceived with motives that undermine the peace and security of the country. The Commissioner said the meeting was likely to shift the focus of the nation from the ongoing elections process and thereby cause confusion and instability, particularly given that members of the certain proscribed entities had made threats to sabotage the process. Various trade unions all over the world staged activities in support of trade unionists in Swaziland and the global week of action led by the Swaziland United Democratic Front (SUDF) and its campaign wing, the Swaziland Democracy Campaign (SDC). The police action was criticized globally as an attack on the constitutional rights of Swazi people to freedom of assembly.

Page 18

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

3. KING MSWATI III

Kings new name for non-democracy 2 September 2013 Swazilands King Mswati III, who rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, has declared there will be a new kind of democracy in his kingdom, but even the briefest glance at his plan shows it is exactly the same as the present system. The king said the present Tinkhundla system would be replaced by what he calls Monarchical Democracy. He revealed this to his subjects on Saturday (31August 2013) as he opened the 2013 International Trade Fair in Manzini. He said he was told in a vision that he should do this. The Times Sunday, an independent newspaper in Swaziland, reported, The king said the revelation came to him during the time when strange weather occurred on Friday night. He said the vision came to him when lightning struck on a winter night that generally had neither clouds nor rain. He said the lightning occurred while he tried to comprehend what was happening and that was when he saw the new name of the Swazi democracy. The newspaper added, The king said in the vision, he was shown a new name for the Tinkhundla system of governance. The revelation also came with a definition of what could be described as a new form of democracy. The king said the system should now be known as Monarchical Democracy. However, what the newspaper did not explain was that the new democracy would be no different from the present version in Swaziland. Political parties will still be banned from taking part in elections and the kings subjects will only be allowed to vote for a small number of individuals to the House of Assembly, they still will not be allowed to elect any members of the senate. The king will continue to choose the prime minister and the government. The parliament will still have no powers and will be subservient to the wishes of the king. The king has been under increasing criticism from democratic nations to allow his subjects the opportunity to have political parties and elect their own government. The king said, When we travel internationally, they ask us about the Tinkhundla system of governance and we have always had difficulty defining and explaining it. The Times reported the king said, According to Section 79 of the Constitution of Swaziland, the system of government is democratic and participatory based on Tinkhundla. The system emphasises on the devolution of state power from central government to Tinkhundla while individual merit is a basis for election and appointment into public office. The newspaper reported the king said Monarchical Democracy was a new system which was unique to Africa and Swaziland. He described it as a reinvention of the Tinkhundla system.

Page 19

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom He said this democracy was special because it defined a system formed by merging the will of the people with the monarch. He said in this system, people cast votes on a ballot box to decide leaders from community level. These leaders then work with the monarch in governing the country. The king said the new system ensured that the king worked with the people who were freely elected by the people in the leadership of the country. He said there were many ideologies of democracy in the world but with the Monarchical Democracy, Swaziland presented to the world a system that was home-grown and could be adopted and used by any country. He added, [The] Monarchical democracy system was the best in the world.

God tells King Mswati a home truth 3 September 2013 God got it spot on when He told King Mswati III in a vision last Friday (30 August 2013) that a better name for the political system in Swaziland was a Monarchical Democracy. The king said he received the message during a thunderstorm and immediately decided to stop calling the political structure in his kingdom Tinkhundla and to revert to the new title. If readers take a moment to look at a dictionary they will find that Gods Words aptly describe what prodemocracy activists have been saying for years: the king rules Swaziland as an absolute monarch. Heres the definition of monarch: One who reigns over a state or territory, usually for life and by hereditary right, especially a sole and absolute ruler. And, this is Monarchical: Ruled by or having the supreme power resting with a monarch; monarchical government. So there you have it. Monarchical Democracy is exactly what Swaziland has. All power rests with the king; political parties are banned from taking part in elections; dissenting voices are crushed. Readers will note that God did not say He agreed with King Mswati ruling Swaziland as an absolute monarch, He merely said that is what the king does. The question now is: why did God choose this time, only a couple of weeks before the national election in Swaziland, to point this out? King believes he is chosen by God 3 September 2013 The vision Swazilands King Mswati III says he received last week was not the first time recently God has spoken to him.

Page 20

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

In 2011, the King said God spoke to him through a TV remote control. It happened at the Lozitha Palace, near Mbabane. At the time the king told his subjects about his miraculous experience. The Times of Swaziland, the kingdoms only independent daily newspaper, reported in October 2011, His Majesty saw a miracle yesterday when he was preparing a sermon [to preach to a group of evangelical Christians.] The King said a remote control lay at the centre of a coffee table but something mysteriously brought it down. He said there was no person or wind that could have brought it down. The King said he realised that God was with him. It was Him who brought the remote control down. Reverend Jonas Dlamini, one of the kings preachers, said, The king preached to us. He was filled with the light of the Lord when he told us that God had given him a sign when he was getting ready to meet us. He said a TV remote on his table dropped to the floor with no one touching it and that is how he knew God was communicating with him. King Mswatis older brother, Prince Masitsela Dlamini, told African Eye News Service that God had given the royal family authority to rule over other Swazi clans. The Dlaminis are closer to God, said Dlamini. African Eye reported at the time that according to political observer Charles Ndwandwe, the King, who normally preaches at prayer meetings, believes he is one of Gods chosen ones. Ndwandwe said, King Mswati claims the right to his absolute power on the basis of both Swazi culture and the biblical divine rights of kings. His brothers are on record as saying democracy and other forms of government are illegitimate because the bible sanctions kings but not presidents or elected officials. So it is important that the king be able to say he was given a direct sign from God, in this case the seemingly inexplicable dropping of a TV remote from a palace coffee table. See also FEARS OVER KINGS MENTAL HEALTH

King admits no change on democracy 16 September 2013 King Mswati III of Swaziland has admitted publicly that the Monarchical Democracy he introduced to his subjects after receiving a vision from God is nothing more than a name change for the existing Tinkhundla system. He described it to the Reuters news agency as, No change really. It's just a name so people can understand. The admission will embarrass many of his followers as they claimed it showed that King

Page 21

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, had invented a new kind of democracy. It was, Reuters reported, merely a name change for foreign consumption. The news agency reported the king saying, The world really doesnt understand the Tinkhundla system, but everybody can understand monarchical democracy. Its an English name. This monarchical democracy is a marriage between the traditional monarchy and the ballot box, all working toget her under the monarchy. Swaziland is holding it national election on Friday (20 September 2013). All political parties are banned from taking part. The poll will select 55 members of the House of assembly, the other 10 members are appointed by the king. No members of the 30-strong Senate House are elected by the people: the king appoints 20 senators and the others are elected by the House of Assembly. Report blasts Royal Familys greed 17 September 2013 The greed of Swazilands Royal Family damages t he lives of ordinary Swazi people, a Freedom House report just published says. And, King Mswati IIIs insistence on putting himself above the law has hit the economy and institutions of state, the report says. Freedom House calls the actions of the Royal Family devastating and says, a culture of greed and suspicion are deeply entrenched at the highest level of the Royal Family. It adds, the occult has a surprisingly large influence over decision making in the kingdom. Previewing the report called Swaziland: A Failed Feudal State that was released on Tuesday (17 September 2013), Freedom House said it detailed, the devastating effects of King Mswatis absolute rule on the people of Swaziland. It documents, the damage done to the lives of ordinary Swazis, the economy and the institutions of state through a combination of the Royal Familys greed and the monarchs insistence on putting himself above the law. In a statement, Freedom House said, The report is released three days before Swazis are due to go to the polls in elections that are widely expected to be neither free nor credible and that will elect representatives with no powers or say in the running the country. Daniel Calingaert, executive vice president of Freedom House, said, This report finds that Mswati not only rules over a kingdom where 50 percent of the youth are unemployed and 80 percent of people die before their 40th birthday, his government also denies citizens their basic rights through a ban on political parties, prohibition of peaceful gatherings and widespread use of the security forces to harass, arrest and torture dissidents. The report reveals that a culture of greed and suspicion are deeply entrenched at the highest

Page 22

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom level of the Royal Family and that the occult has a surprisingly large influence over decision making in the kingdom. It also reports how the king is tightening his grip on power by drastically increasing security sector spending. Freedom House says the democratic movement suffers from divisions within its own ranks that weaken its ability to oppose the kings increasingly oppressive regime. Calingaert said, While the solution to Swazilands problems must be homegrown, foreign governments should follow the lead and support the efforts of civil society to bring about positive change in the country. The report recommends that the democratic movement in Swaziland must continue to push for change by setting its own agenda, forming tactical alliances and not allowing Swaziland to become subject to a reform process imposed by the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) or other external actors. The report concludes that civil society must also ensure that there is sufficient international attention brought to bear on the crisis in Swaziland. Kings life dominated by fear - report 17 September 2013 Musa Ndlangamandla, the former propagandist for King Mswati III of Swaziland, has revealed the king suffers from paranoia and his life is dominated by fear. Ndlangamandla, one time chief editor of the kings newspaper group, the Swazi Observer, and a former speech writer and praise singer for the monarch, said, At the back of Mswatis mind, he knows he was not intended to be king. Ndlangamandla made his comments in a report just published by Freedom House. He said the kings life was dominated by muti (which includes charms and potions used to cast spells and curses) and the king was certain it could kill him. In the report called Swaziland: A Failed Feudal State, Freedom House quoted Ndlangamandla saying, At the back of Mswatis mind, he knows he was not intended to be king. This might be the basis of his paranoia. The king is certain muti can kill him, and his life is dominated by fear. Mswati believes that he is imbued with a potent aura (infukwana), and part of the aura can be transferred to any person or object in Swaziland that he might touch. This is the reason why no Swazi may shake hands with the king. Also when Mswati has visited a Swazis home, the chair where he sat must be taken away by the kings servants and destroyed. If not, the host could hire a witch to use the aura left on the chair to make muti and harm the king. The Freedom House report added, Any suspected attempt to use muti to attack the king is taken very seriously and sets off procedures to sniff out and eliminate potential harm to the king.

Page 23

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom Ndlangamandla recalls a tediously long meeting when, as always, the king was seated in a comfortable chair and the other participants were seated on the floor. To alleviate his boredom, Ndlangamandla picked up a loose fiber from the carpet and twirled the fiber between two fingers. As the meeting ended, Mswati ordered Ndlangamandla to stay, questioned him about the fiber and brought in a team of tinyanga [medicine men] to doctor the fiber and the place on the floor where Ndlangamandla had found it. Large numbers of Swazis consider the king to be a powerful muti practitioner in his own right, and the kings close association with occult practices is an important pillar of his power. Highly educated Swazi cabinet ministers crawl in the kings presence, and many rural people drop to their knees when they see the flashing blue lights of an official motorcade believing the king might be inside one of the cars, Freedom House said. This is not the first time, the Kings exposure to muti and the occult has been exposed. In February 2010, Earl Irvine, the then US Ambassador to Swaziland, wrote a confidential cable to the State Department in Washington. In the cable, later revealed by Wikileaks, Irvine wrote about what he called Witchcraft and More: A Portrait of Influences on King Mswati III. In the cable Irvine said traditional leaders, superstition, and members of the royal family were the major influences on the king. Irvine wrote, King Mswati III believes in muti and attempts to use muti to attack the king are taken seriously. He wrote that muti people hold great sway within the royal family, and that the king must eat and drink whatever they give him during traditional ceremonies, particularly when in seclusion. If they are unhappy with the direction the king is taking the country, then the king has cause to worry. A report of what King Mswati does at the annual Incwala ceremony has been circulating since 2011. It was written by an eyewitness who called himself Sithembiso Simelane. In Simelanes account, King Mswati is said to take muti and allows himself to be licked all over his body by a snake while drugged. In one part of the supposedly-sacred ceremony he has sexual intercourse with a drugged bull; in another he publicly has sex with two of his wives. See also SWAZI KING AND BESTIALITY RITUAL SWAZI KINGS BESTIALITY WENT WRONG

Page 24

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom One-legged man barred from King 19 September 2013 A businessman with only one leg was barred from meeting King Mswati III of Swaziland because he would not be able to kneel before the monarch. Peter Petersie, aged 54, of Hlatikhulu, who was leading a group of businessmen, wanted an audience with the king at the Mbangweni Royal Residence to discuss development matters. But, he was told that because he had one leg, he could not kneel down as required by custom when before the king. He was barred by Lindiwe Dlamini, the outgoing Housing and Urban Development Minister. The Times of Swaziland, the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom, reported Petersie saying, I am still shocked by the way Dlamini treated me, it was the highest standard of discrimination I have ever seen in my lifetime. He added, We went there to deliver two cows to the king and I was in charge of the funds and having got inside Mbangweni Palace with a colleague, Minister Dlamini said I could not see the king because I have only one leg. He said, I have contributed in building the economy of Swaziland and I do not deserve to be blocked from seeing the king, despite my disabled condition I am a productive Swazi citizen hence, I should not be discriminated against but treated as a human being. The treatment of Petersie is not unusual in Swaziland, where King Mswati rules as subSaharan Africas last absolute monarch and requires every Swazi, reg ardless of their rank, to kneel when they are before him. In August 2013 a group of disabled people in the Ngcamphalala Chiefdom of Swaziland, said they were treated like animals by traditional authorities in the kingdom. A group called the Association for People Living with Disabilities said they were concerned that a local development by Swaziland Water Agricultural Development Enterprise (SWADE) which empowered people through agricultural schemes such as growing sugar cane had excluded them. Sifiso Nhleko, chair of the local Association for People Living with Disabilities, group told local media, The chiefdoms inner council has let us down as they have done nothing to include us in the development yet they know that we exist. They have not approved our involvement in the development. He added, We are also human beings and deserve to be included in development. People without disabilities treat us as if we are animals and government and development agencies do not take us into consideration when implementing development. Disabled people in Swaziland are marginalised by traditions and superstitions. A report published by SINTEF Technology and Society, Global Health and Welfare in 2011 that studied living conditions among people with disabilities in Swaziland, found, There is a general belief that those who have a disability are bewitched or inflicted by bad spirits.

Page 25

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

Many believe that being around people with disabilities can bring bad luck. As a result, many people with disabilities are hidden in their homesteads and are not given an opportunity to participate and contribute to society. The report was the result of an extensive study in the kingdom in 2009 and 2010. It also found that people with disabilities had been abandoned by the Swazi Government. The report stated, The absence of any comprehensive laws and policies to address people with disabilities access to equal opportunities reflect a lack of political will and a failure to recognize disability as a human right issue contributes to the devaluing and dehumanising of people with disabilities. See also DISABLED PEOPLE TREATED LIKE ANIMALS

Page 26

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

4. HUMAN RIGHTS
Critic of King charged with sedition 18 September 2013 In a new clampdown on free speech ahead of the elections in Swaziland on Friday, news has emerged that a sugar cane farmer has been charged with sedition for allegedly making unfavourable comments about King Mswati III. Allen Nkululeko Mango, aged 48, of Manzini, is alleged to have made comments against the king near the offices of Vuvulane Town Board. Local media report that the comments were made at a meeting where Mango and other farmers met senior government officials. He has been charged under the Sedition and Subversive Activities Act No. 46 of 1938. The Times of Swaziland, the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom, where King Mswati ruLes as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, reported the charges that Mango, wrongfully and unlawfully made comments which brought hatred or contempt against the King of Swaziland, King Mswati III so that he can be hated by his subjects at Vuvulane. The comments are alleged to have been made on 5 February 2013, but Mango was only arrested on Friday 13 September. He has applied for bail but the Director of Public Prosecutions is opposing him. There has been a clampdown against free speech in Swaziland ahead of the national election this Friday (20 September 2013). Musa Dube, the deputy general secretary of the Communist party of Swaziland, was charged last week with sedition for allegedly distributing leaflets calling for a boycott of the election.

Page 27

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

5. MEDIA
King praises his own journalists 17 September 2013 King Mswati III has praised his own newspaper, the Swazi Observer, for the coverage it has given to the national election due on Friday. The king in effect owns the conglomerate Tibiyo Taka Ngwane that in turn owns the Observer group. Mbongeni Mbingo, the Observer managing editor, wrote in his own newspaper, He said, in particular, this newspaper had endeavoured to encourage the nation to exercise its right to vote, and had continued to give good coverage of the exercise. Mbingo reported, The king said he had observed that a lot of the excitement around the election was because the media was playing its role as a catalyst. Such praise from the king is not unexpected. In its last annual report on media freedom, published in May 2013, the Media Institute of Southern Africa called the Swazi Observer a pure propaganda machine for the royal family. The coverage of the election by the Observer is in stark contrast to that of international media. They are pointing out that the election for 55 members of the House of Assembly has little purpose since political parties are banned from taking part and parliament has no power. The king rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch. The comments were part of a wider interview the Swazi Observer had with King Mswati. It was billed as an exclusive, but a similar interview was published in the Times of Swaziland, the Observers only rival newspaper on the same day.Reuters news agency also published an interview with the king last week. See also MISA TELLS TIMES EDITOR TO RESIGN THE STATE OF SWAZI JOURNALISM 2013

Censorship over Kings latest bride 23 September 2013 Media in Swaziland are once again censoring themselves when reporting about King Mswati III. The latest case involves his new fiance, the 18-year-old beauty queen contestant Sindiswa Dlamini. News broke at a Reed Dance in the southern provincial capital, Nhlangano, in Swaziland last week that the 45-year-old king had chosen her as his new bride from among tens of thousands Page 28

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom of bare-breasted virgins who paraded before him at annual Reed Dance celebrations. Media in Swaziland predictably reported the event as if it were quite natural for a middleaged man to wed a virgin who was younger than many of his daughters. But outside the kingdom, which King Mswati rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch, the media have been more candid. They reported Dlamini as the kings 14th bride, although some counted her as wife number 15. The confusion was excusable since the number of wives the king has is considered a state secret in Swaziland and it is considered un-Swazi to talk openly about King Mswatis polygamy. Media outside Swaziland are reporting that Naughty Sindi, as the Sunday Sun newspaper in South Africa describes her, has had affairs with two of King Mswatis sons, Prince Majaha and Prince Bandzile, who are both in their early twenties. One unnamed source told the newspaper, Sindi has dated both these boys. Shes a party girl used to having fun. Another informant told Sunday Sun, Sindi is no virgin. She drinks and smokes a lot and has tattoos on parts of her body I cannot mention. One source told the newspaper, She is only doing it [marrying the king] because she comes from a poor background. The media in Swaziland never report about the king without his permission. This means people across the world are better informed than the kings subjects, the Swazi people. This is not the first time the media in Swaziland have refused to keep its readers informed about the Swazi Royal Family. In August 2010, the worlds media were excited by the case of Swaziland Justice Minister Ndumiso Mamba and King Mswatis 12th wife, 22 -year-old Inkhosikati Nothando LaDube. This was after pictures appeared of Mamba hiding in a bed before his arrest at Royal Villas, a hotel at Ezulwini just outside Mbabane, where he was said to have had regular adulterous meetings with LaDube. The City Press in South Africa reported at the time that when police pounced, in a desperate effort not to be found out Mamba cut into the base of the bed and slid in but police ordered him out and Mamba, dressed in a brown suit, was soon taken into custody. He was later forced to resign from the government and the Senate. The aftermath of the scandal ran for at least two months: all unreported by media in Swaziland. Most of the broadcast media in Swaziland that carries news and current affairs reporting are government controlled and are banned directly from adversely reporting about the royal family. There are two newspaper groups in Swaziland. One, the Swazi Observer is in effect owned by the king, and the other, the Times of Swaziland censors itself heavily when reporting about the monarchy.

Page 29

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

In April 2007, King Mswati personally threatened the Times with closure after the Times Sunday published a minor criticism of him sourced from Afrol, an international news agency. The king said he would close the paper down unless people responsible for the publication at the paper were sacked and the newspaper published an abject apology to the king. These things were done.

Police point gun at journalist 30 September 2013 A Swaziland police officer pointed a gun in the face of a newspaper photographer to try to force him to destroy pictures he had taken of police beating up a protestor. Walter Dlamini, of the Times Sunday, had taken photos at Gege where police had broken up a peaceful protest march by youth in the area. They were protesting against alleged irregularities at the recent election. The Times Sunday reported, Dlaminis only sin was taking pictures of some police officers who were mercilessly beating a protestor, who was only identified by his name Brother next to a police vehicle. The officer pointed a short gun at Dlaminis face and demanded why he took pictures of the officers who were at work. The intervention of his colleague Mduduzi Magagula saved the day as the officer was informed to stop interfering with the work of journalists. He left in a huff as the reporters told him that the pictures they had taken would not be deleted. In an editorial comment, the papers companion title, the Times of Swaziland, said, [T]his is harassment and intimidation of the highest order, an implicit threat to the life of the journalist. http://www.times.co.sz/features/91807-reporting-at-gunpoint.html It added, This sorry excuse for a police officer had reason to be worried; he and his colleagues were caught in the act assaulting a protestor who was manifestly not being threatening but was obviously being punished; being struck on the knee (where permanent damage could occur) with a heavy wooden truncheon by one uniformed brute while two others held him and another watched from a short distance, truncheons dangling in readiness from their hands. The casual work-a-day savagery of these police officers and their sense of entitlement to brutalising Swazi citizens with impunity goes a long way to explaining why they would attack with teargas and batons what was a peaceful protest march before their intervention; once again proving the police are responsible for much of the violence that erupts during protests.

Page 30

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

6. REED DANCE
Cultural Reed Dance is political 3 September 2013 The Reed Dance, billed as Swazilands foremost cultural days, proved to be anything but, when 120,000 half-naked maidens reportedly sang a song praising King Mswati IIIs latest pronouncement about his continued rule over his kingdom. They praised the King for announcing at the weekend that henceforth Swaziland would be a Monarchical Democracy. This is a new name for the already existing Tinkhundla system that bans political parties from elections and puts all power in the hands of the king. The king said he had been told in a vision to make this change. The song included these words (loosely translated from the original), Your Majesty Swaziland is well governed through the Tinkhundla System of Democracy and will be victorious through it. The Times of Swaziland, the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom, reported, Royal Swaziland Police Superintendent Wendy Hleta who was the Master ( sic) of Ceremonies together with Former Indvuna YeMbali Nothando Ntshangase noted that the maidens were seemingly pleased with the message conveyed by the new composition. Hleta told the newspaper, Your Majesty, through this song the maidens are expressing their happiness of being governed through the Tinkhundla System of Monarchical Democracy. It is nothing new for participants in the Reed Dance, also known as Umhlanga, to sing antidemocracy songs. Last year (2013), about 500 children were ordered to sing a song vilifying political parties. They were then ordered to return to their homes and teach the words to other girls in their chiefdoms. This was part of a clampdown on dissent in the kingdom, where the king rules as sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch. In 2009, the South Africa Press Association reported, During the four -hour event, children sang songs which glorified Mswati and condemned his enemies. See also BEWARE REED DANCE PROPAGANDA SWAZIS FORCED TO DANCE FOR THE KING

Page 31

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Richard Rooney was associate professor at the University of Swaziland 2005 2008, where he was also the founding head of the Journalism and Mass Communication Department. He has taught in universities in Africa, Europe and the Pacific. His academic research which specialises in media and their relationships to democracy, governance and human rights has appeared in books and journals across the world. His writing regularly appears in newspapers, magazines and on websites. He was a full-time journalist in his native United Kingdom for 10 years, before becoming an academic. He has published the blog Swazi Media Commentary since 2007 and also has other social media sites that concentrate on human rights issues in Swaziland. He holds a Ph.D in Communication from the University of Westminster, London, UK. He presently teaches at the University of Botswana, Gaborone.

Page 32

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom Publications from Swazi Media Commentary available online free-of-charge

BOOKS

2013. The beginning of the End? 2012, a year in the struggle for democracy in Swaziland This compilation of newsletters from Africa Contact in collaboration with Swazi Media Commentary contains an assortment of news, analysis and comment covering the campaign for freedom in Swaziland throughout 2012. These include the Global Action for Democracy held in September; campaigns for democracy spearheaded by trade unions and students and the continuing struggle for rights for women, children, gays and minority groups.

2012. The End of the Beginning? 2011, a year in the struggle for freedom in Swaziland This book looks at activities in the freedom movement in 2011. It starts with a section on the unsuccessful April 12 Uprising followed by separate chapters looking at events in each month of 2011, including the Global Week of Action held in September. They also highlight the numerous violations of rights suffered by the poor, by children, by women and by sexual minorities, among others, in the kingdom.

2011. Voices Unheard: Media Freedom and Censorship in Swaziland. This volume of pages from Swazi Media Commentary focuses on media freedom and censorship. It starts with some overview articles that set out the general terrain, moving on to look at repressive media laws. Other sections of this book relate the daily threats journalists in Swaziland face when they want to report, but are not allowed to.

Page 33

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

OCCASIONAL PAPERS SERIES

No. 1. 2013. Cynicism Eats Away at Swaziland Journalism: The state of Swazi journalism, 2013 One thing that shines out about journalists and their editors in Swaziland is the deeply cynical way they operate. Swazi journalists claim to be upholders of fine ethical traditions of honesty and inquiry, but instead they are often publishing lies or playing with readers emotions to boost company profits. This article explores the state of newspaper journalism in Swaziland, a small kingdom in Africa, ruled over by King Mswati III, sub-Saharan Africas last absolute monarch. Editors are deliberately misleading their readers by publishing material that is intended to provoke controversy and reaction, even though they know it also contains lies. This is done in order to boost profits for owners. No. 2. 2013. Swaziland Broadcasting Not For The People A review of broadcasting in Swaziland that demonstrates through research that radio in the kingdom only serves the interests of King Mswati III and his intimate supporters. All other voices are excluded from the airwaves. The paper contrasts a public broadcasting service with public service broadcasting and demonstrates that changes in the kingdoms broadcasting cannot be made until it becomes a democratic state. No. 3. 2013. Swaziland Media Need Code of Conduct for Covering Elections A review of how media have covered past elections in Swaziland highlighting a number of areas for improvement. The paper includes a suggested code of ethical conduct that Swazi journalists can adopt in order to improve performance. No.4. 2013. Swaziland Press Freedom: The case of Bekhi Makhubu and the Nation magazine In April 2013 Bheki Makhubu the editor of the Nation magazine and its publishers, Swaziland Independent Publishers were convicted of scandalising the court after two articles criticising the judiciary were published in 2009 and 2010. The purpose of this paper is to bring together details of the story so far (May 2013). It is an attempt to bring under one cover all the available information on the case in order to assist those people in the future who might need a quick primer. No.5. 2013. Media Coverage of Swaziland Election 2013. A review of media coverage of the Swaziland national election, most notably in the only two newspaper groups in the kingdom, and at international media. It notes that generally newspapers in Swaziland ignored the real issue, that of the non-democratic nature of the elections, and concentrated instead on trying to justify the governance system to their readers.

Page 34

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

SWAZILAND: STRIVING FOR FREEDOM

PREVIOUS EDITIONS

Volume 1, Jan 2013, is available free of charge here. Volume 2, Feb 2013, is available free of charge here. Volume 3, March 2013, is available free of charge here. Volume 4, April 2013, is available free of charge here. Volume 5, May 2013, is available free of charge here. Volume 6, June 2013, is available free of charge here. Volume 7, July 2013, is available free of charge here. Volume 8, August 2013, is available free of charge here.

Page 35

Swaziland: Striving for Freedom

Swazi Media Commentary

Containing information and commentary about human rights in Swaziland Click Here

Page 36