Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
cement
MAGAZINE
globalcement .com
OCTOBER 2013
Global Cement news Lime North Africa Alternative fuels VDZ Congress Pneumatic conveying Expansion joints
Subscribe Contents Ad Index
TM
C
M
J
CM
MJ
CJ
CMJ
N
C
M
J
CM
MJ
CJ
CMJ
N
ISSN: 1473-7940
Published by:
Pro Global Media Ltd
First Floor, Adelphi Court
1 East Street, Epsom, Surrey, UK KT17 1BB
Tel: +44 (0)1372 743837 (switchboard)
Fax: +44 (0)1372 743838
Editor Dr Robert McCafrey
rob.mccafrey@propubs.com
Deputy editor Dr Peter Edwards
peter.edwards@propubs.com
Admin Sally Hope
sally.hope@propubs.com
Subscriptions Sonal Patel
sonal.patel@propubs.com
Commercial director Paul Brown
paul.brown@propubs.com
Mobile: (+44) (0) 7767 475 998
Business development Sren Rothfahl
executive soeren.rothfahl@propubs.com
Mobile: (+44) (0) 7850 669 169
Web editor David Perilli
david.perilli@propubs.com
The Editor welcomes editorial contributions (letters,
articles etc). For full details on article submission, please
see: www.GlobalCement.com
SUBSCRIBE TODAY SEE PAGE 64
Independent thinking and analysis
Best for news, prices and trends
Global cement news and country reports
Global cement technology
Your own copy, on time, every issue!
www.globalcement.com
Exclusive Ofcial Magazine for
Global Cement Conferences:
Global CemFuels, Global Slag,
Global CemTrader, Global CemPower,
Global Cement India,
Asian Cement & Lime, Global Boards,
Global Well Cem.
OCTOBER2013
GLOBAL SLAG CONFERENCE
10-11 December 2013, Dubai, UAE
Improving slag performance
New applications for slag
Global slag markets and trading
globalcement MAGAZINE October 2013 3
gl bal
cement
MAGAZINE
World Business
Council for
Sustainable
Development
Cement
Industry
Suppliers
Forum
Dear readers,
In the global cement news in this October 2013 issue of Global Cement Magazine, the
spectre of cartels in the cement industry has reared its ugly head once again. In India
there are reports that cement prices have risen dramatically of late, increasing by 30% in
just a week in some areas at the end of September 2013. A major real-estate association
has claimed in no uncertain terms that this is the result of a cartel. Meanwhile, fve
producers are under investigation in Colombia afer the Superintendency of Industry
and Commerce claimed that it had identifed an alleged agreement to fx prices and
divide up the market since 2010. Also, in Tanzania, the East Africa Cement Producers
Association (EACPA) has denied the existence of a cartel in that market in response to
similar accusations, claiming that there is ferce competition in the sector.
Claims of cartels are relatively easy to grasp in subdued markets with oversupply like
India. However, the claims being tackled by the EACPA in Tanzania are diferent, taking
place in a country and region where cement demand is on the rise and one where
imports are a major factor in supply. Cement production in Tanzania almost doubled
from 1.25Mt in 2004 to 2.4Mt in 2011. More projects are proposed, which will see the
countrys capacity increase. Further cement is sourced from overseas from cement
export hot-spots like the Middle East, China and Pakistan. Around 4.1Mt/yr came into
East Africa in 2012. Trying to establish a formal cartel in this sort of environment would
require an impossible amount of work, requiring efort from a very large number of
players from several diferent countries. However, if external producers are exporting to
an East African market that has inherently high prices, the importers would only need
to undercut these producers by a small margin. Once again, this raises the possiblilty of
multi-player non-deliberate cement price infation. As always, inexplicably high prices
that look like a cartel are not necessarily indicative of deliberate price manipulation.
Actual collusion is notoriously hard to prove. Whatever the causes of the current claims
in India, Colombia and Tanzania, however, it is ultimately private and public contractors
and their customers, the public, that end up paying higher cement prices.
Elsewhere in this October 2013 issue, there are articles covering the global lime
industry, alternative fuels, solar energy, expansion joints, pneumatic conveying and
bulk handling. Tere is also an in-depth review of the recent VDZ
Congress in Dsseldorf, Germany and a look at the forthcoming
TCMA Congress in Antalya, Turkey.
We hope that you enjoy this issue of Global Cement Magazine!
Dr Peter Edwards
Deputy Editor
Global Cement Magazine
is printed on Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certifed
papers by Wyndeham Grange, a company with ISO
14001:2004 environmental certifcation.
CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION
This issues front cover...
Standard Industrie International: A French company
present all across the world, has been specialized for 35
years in bulk handling. Declogging, industrial vacuuming,
conveyor belt optimiation and on site interventions; the
motto of Standard Industrie International is to support the
bulk industry. This picture highlights its fagship product:
the AIRCHOC. This air cannon which contributed to the
success of Standard Industrie International, is presented
here in its Wireless version. Remote control, no cable: so
many benefts that enable efective and safe solving of
clogging problems.
See: www.standard-industrie.com
gl bal
cement
MAGAZINE
globalcement.com
OCTOBER2013
Global Cement news Lime North Africa Alternative fuels VDZ Congress Pneumatic conveying Expansion joints
TM
C
M
J
CM
MJ
CJ
CMJ
N
C
M
J
CM
MJ
CJ
CMJ
N
Subscribe Ad Index
TM
www.GlobalSlag.com
9th
gl bal
slag
Dirk Lechtenberg, MVW Lechtenberg & Partner
Alternativefuels-What about theenvironment?
- Part 1
14 globalcementMAGAZINE October 2013
ALTERNATIVEFUELS
Alternative fuels are now a frmly-established reality in well-developed cement industries
around the world and increasing amounts of alternative fuels are also being used in developing
economies. Here, MVW Lechtenberg & Partners Dirk Lechtenberg uncovers a wealth of
information regarding the use of alternative fuels in the German cement industry, especially with
reference to the relatively unexplored negative aspects of their use. Alternative fuels may mean
lower CO2 emissions, avoidance of landfll and decreased costs but they may also entail higher
numbers of truck movements, higher dust emissions and higher specifc energy consumption per
tonne of cement. Part 2 of Dirk Lechtenbergs research will follow in the November 2013 issue of
Global Cement Magazine.
W
hen a cement plant announces to
the public that secondary fuels from
waste or biomass will be used, its at this
stage (at the very latest) that the ques-
tion is posed as to whether such
alternative fuels have a nega-
tive or harmful infuence on
the environment and the
immediate environs of the ce-
ment plant. Te possibility that all
burning can have a negative efect on
the environment should be obvious to
everybody. In many cases this topic
is discussed in an animated man-
ner as it has a very emotional
efect. It is, in many cases,
understandably aficted
with residents existential
concerns.
When a cement plant announces a
new fuel, the neighbouring vegetable
grower, for example, is worried he
will no longer be able to sell his
vegetables. Residents may be
concerned that alternative fuels
will lead to dust or odour pol-
lution. A classic example is the
burning of tyres. Who hasnt seen the
pictures of rising black clouds of smoke if a
tyre storage depot catches fre?
Of course each cement plant operators will try to
consider the topic of emissions scientifcally. Ofen they
will try, using data and fgures, to prove to neighbours
and in the worst case, opponents of such coincineration,
that no such efects on mankind and the environment
need to be feared.
No efects at all? Well, claiming that there will be no
ill efects will surely be incorrect. Also the cement plant
operator ofen has no suitable and independent data
and facts at his disposal. Te use of alternative fuels will
always have an infuence on the operational behaviour
of a cement plant and, as a result, on the immediate en-
virons of the plant. Tis begins with changed logistics
for the fuels to be utilised. If previously a truck delivered
20t of coal to a cement plant with a calorifc value of ~
500GJ, in future maybe 30 trucks will be required to de-
liver the same calorifc value of alternative fuels. Tese
are direct consequences and efects that will surely be
felt by immediate neighbours of a cement plant.
For the main part, the possible displeasure of the
residents will not be focused on the immediate efects
but on the indirect efects, such as altered emissions
froma cement plant.
For the latter, every cement producer will of course
immediately have worldwide cement association sta-
tistics or those of the cement sustainability initiative
or such to hand (and presented using nice photos) in
order to emphasise the advantages of using alternative
fuels to all possible critics. Emissions data prognoses
are also presented, especially regarding saved fossil
CO2 emissions, in order to illustrate the advantages of
the plants intentions.
For many decades environmentalists have been
struggling worldwide to publicise emissions data from
industrial facilities, not only to pillory possible environ-
mental contaminators but also to promote awareness of
responsible behaviour among all industrial facilities. Re-
member - 20 or 30 years ago environmental protection
in industrial complexes in many countries in Europe
for example, was still being handled as an aferthought.
Environmental protection was a necessary evil.
Nowadays the situation is presented somewhat dif-
ferently. Environmental protection and sustainability
are the slogans that we encounter every day in indus-
trial company statements. For sustainable companies
there is even an index of its own on the New York stock
exchange. Only sustainably-run companies nowadays
have a chance to attract new employees, to receive com-
pany loans or to sell their products. Everything is green,
light or sustainable. Te fact that appearances ofen
deceive is something that we witness more and more
in the consumer or food industry. Egg boxes with pic-
tures of hens running around in the open. Who wants
to buy eggs laid by hens in cages? Light butter, which
is merely frothed up with nitrogen and as a result no
longer weighs 500g but 340g and is hence light.
CO2 emission penalty remains, delivering mortar with
CO2 footprints of ~190kg/t. Other specialist binders are
available, (e.g. natural hydraulic lime or NHL), which
are manufactured from impure limestone to deliver a
blend of belite, limestone, lime and alite. Tis composi-
tion is analogous to 1:1:6 v/v cement mortars as NHLs
contain the alite/belite cementitious species.4
Teir composition precludes manufacture in ef-
cient gas fred PFR kilns relying on coal fred vertical or
cement horizontal kilns. Limeco estimates that a stand-
ard 1:3 v/v NHL:sand mortar still has a CO2 footprint of
~150kg/t. NHLs are used solely as binders for special-
ist restoration work and remain niche due to slow and
unreliable setting rates combined with poor workability.
However their lower levels of alite/belite deliver mortars
with some vapour permeability (porosity) and fexibility
under load.
Te key performance element of all commercial
hydraulic binders, cement or NHL, is the formation of
CSH. Te challenge, therefore, for Limeco was to create
a sustainable binder technology, rich in CO2-absorbing
Ca(OH)2 that delivered sufcient CSH for structural
purposes without employing alite/belite.
To this end, Limeco has developed a hydraulic lime
binder technology, which employs hydrated lime with
a proprietary highly-active silica additive that is made
fromsand.5
Upon mixing Limeco binder with aggregate and
water, it reacts quickly to form CSH, leaving over 80%
free Ca(OH)2 to adsorb atmospheric CO2. Te high lime
content afords excellent workability and the rate of set
and 28 day strengths are comparable to 1:1:6 mixes or
gypsumplasters.
Limeco has worked with its suppliers to accurately
determine the CO2 footprint of its products. Work in the
laboratory and feld shows that Limeco binders absorb
over 75% of the CO2 emitted during their manufacture
within 1 year (See Figure 2), delivering mortars with
CO2 footprints of ~40kg/t of mortar. Tis compares to
CO2 emissions of 150-220kg/t for cementitious binders.
Tis is demonstrated by pH indicator staining,
Ca(OH)2 analysis and gravimetric assessment of mortars
made with Limeco
products. Such
mortars gain weight
over time as CO2 is
absorbed. Sufcient
free Ca(OH)2 is re-
tained for autogenic
self-healing (See
Figure 3). Recycling
the mortars is also
simple.
By utilising limestone and sand raw materials and
processing these with the most efcient gas fuelled plant
to deliver a quick setting and workable CO2-absorbing
lime binder technology, Limeco has launched a range
of Truly Sustainable products within Europe under its
trademark, HyperLime.
HyperLime has low bulk density and is typically used
as 1:3 v/v HyperLime:aggregate mix (HyperLime ~10%
w/w) so it is competitive on cost. HyperLime binders do
not contain the known carcinogens, crystalline silica or
heavy metals. Current HyperLime 2 and HyperLime 3.5
products are CE marked (EN459:2010) and HyperLime
5 will be launched shortly.
Limeco works with international licensees as suf-
fcient raw materials are available worldwide to make
over 50Mt of HyperLime.
References
1. IPCC, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 2007 (AR4), Working Group
III Report Mitigation of Climate Change, Chapter 7, 2007.
2. Knut O. Kjellsen et al., CO2 uptake during the concrete life cycle: Te
CO2 balance of concrete in a life cycle perspective, Norden Nordic Innova-
tion Centre, December 2005.
3. Entec UK Limited, EU Emissions Trading Scheme Phase II. Review of
new entrants benchmark Lime, Report for UK Government Depart-
ment of Trade and Industry,
Report Version 2, August 2006.
4. For example: http://www.
stastier.co.uk/nhl/info/pdfs/
Hydraulicity_and_Properties_
of_NHL.pdf, Setra Marketing
2006. Accessed 10 October 2012.
Also see: www.c-e-s-a.fr.
5. HyperLime website,
www.hyperlimeco.com.
globalcementMAGAZINE October 2013 29
LIME
Above - Figure 2:
Carbonation rate of
HyperLime mortars.
HyperLime 2%(mass gain)
HyperLime 2%(free lime)
HyperLime 3.5%(mass gain)
HyperLime 3.5%(free lime)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Carbonation (%)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Phenolphtalein stain
Age of mortar (days)
Above - Figure 3:
HyperLime carbonation.
Below: HyperLime as
mortar for brick-laying.
Below left: HyperLime
as a render.
North African nations have seen varying
amounts of political disruption in recent years,
with revolutions in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia and
disruption in Morocco and Algeria. Construction, and hence
cement production, has been a low priority as a result. In some
countries the cement industry is also battling higher fuel costs.
However, recent expansions may signal a brighter cement future for
Africas north coast.
Peter Edwards, Global Cement Magazine
NorthAfricancement focus
GDP US$174.0bn
GDP/capita US$5400
Population 32.6m
Area 446,550km2
54 globalcementMAGAZINE October 2013
Morocco - 23.3Mt/yr
N
ext to the vital trade routes that pass through
the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco has developed a
mixed economy based on exports to its EU neighbours
across the Mediterranean. However, despite relatively
dynamic markets and ranking 13th out of 54 African
nations in terms of GDP/capita, Morocco is still poor
by international standards, with high food costs repre-
senting a particular burden.
Cement industry
Morocco has 13 cement plants and its total capac-
ity is 22.8Mt/yr. Much of the cement industry is
today owned by Lafarge, Holcim, Italcementi and
Camargo Corra units. Cimentos de LAtlas (CIMAT)
is the only Moroccan-owned producer,
Lafarge Maroc is Moroccos largest cement pro-
ducer, with four plants. Its largest plant, a 4.5Mt/yr
facility at Bouskoura, is also Moroccos largest. Other
plants acquired by Lafarge over the years include the
1.2Mt/yr Mekns plant (built in 1945), its 2.5Mt/yr T-
touan plant (2000) and its 1Mt/yr Tangier plant (1954),
which give it a total Moroccan capacity of 9.2Mt/yr.
Holcim operates three
cement plants in Morocco,
at Fes (1.9Mt/yr), Settat
(1.8Mt/yr) and Oujda (1.2Mt/yr), which give it a total
capacity of 4.9Mt/yr. Te Settat plant was expanded
from 0.9Mt/yr in 2012. Holcim also operates a grind-
ing, bagging and distribution centre at Nador and a
bagging and distribution centre in Casablanca.
Italcementi Group operates in Morocco through
Ciments du Maroc. It has three cement plants,
which are located at Agadir At Baha (2.2Mt/yr),
Saf (1.0Mt/yr) and Marrakech (1.4Mt/yr), as well as
a grinding centre in Layoune (0.25Mt/yr), which is
expandable to 0.5Mt/yr in the future. Integrated capac-
ity is 4.6Mt/yr. Te bulk of Italcementis assets come
from its 1999 purchase of Moroccan group Asmar,
although it opened the Agadir Ait Baha plant, built by
Denmarks FLSmidth, in 2010.
Te only Moroccan player in the market is
Ciments de LAtlas (CIMAT), launched by businessman
Anas Sefrioui in 2007. It commissioned Germanys
Polysius to simultaneously construct two identical ce-
ment plants in the nationally strategic regions of Ben
Ahmed and Beni Mellal (both 1.6Mt/yr). CIMAT aims
to become a major player in Morocco.
Te fnal player in the market is Asment de
Tmara (1.3Mt/yr), located in Ain Attig and owned
by Camargo Corra of Brazil. Te plant was part of
a large-scale asset swap between the plants previous
owner, Portugals Cimpor and Camargo Corra in
mid-2012.2
Current situation
Figure 1 shows Moroccan cement production and
GDP/capita for the past two decades. As with many
nations there is a strong correlatation between these
parameters, although Morocco has historically used
relatively little cement compared to its neighbours.
In 2011 the country hit consumption in excess of
500kg/capita/yr, consuming around 16.1Mt, 11% up
on 2010.1 However, in 2012 consumption fell by 1.6%
to 15.9Mt/yr.1
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2011
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
Year
Cement production (Mt)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
GDP/capita (2012 US$)
Below - Figure 1: Cement
production (red) and
GDP/capita (green) for
Morocco, 1993 - 2011/2012.
Above: Summary statistics
for Morocco in 2012.
Month Mt %
Jan 1.18 -25.4
Feb 1.21 -10.7
Mar 1.23 -25.0
Apr 1.38 -2.6
May 1.41 -3.2
Jun 1.37 -2.5
Jul 1.17 -5.5
Aug 0.89 +9.22
Jan-Aug 9.4 -10.2
Below right - Table 1:
Monthly Moroccan cement
consumption statistics for 2013
in Mt, with %year-on-year
changes relative to the same
month of 2012.1
NORTHAFRICA
ELECTRICALENERGY
26 globalcementMAGAZINE October 2013
Hasan Delikanli, Adana imento San. T.A..
AdanaCementsnew
499KWsolar power plant
I
n Turkey, 62% of installed electrical capac-
ity comes from fossil fuel plants. In 2012 73%
of the power generated in the country came
from these. Terefore, Turkey has to import
great amounts of resources for power. Increasing the
amount of investments in the feld of renewable en-
ergy is also an important step for Turkey to decrease
its dependence on foreign resources and implement
sustainable policies.
Adana Cements primary mission is sensitivity
towards society and the environment. In this regard
it has conducted research towards the use of the re-
newable energy sources and observed that Turkey has
great potential for the use of solar power. According to
the fgures of Ministry of Energy, the power generation
capacity of Turkey fromsolar energy is:
Solar energy potential: 380 billion kWh/yr
Average annual sunshine duration: 2640hr
Average daily sunshine duration: 7.2hr
Average annual radiation pressure: 1.31kWh/m
Peak annual radiation pressure: 3.6kWh/m
Photovoltaic power generation
Te most common method of solar power generation is
the photovoltaic method. Tis process uses thousands
of solar cells made from semi-conductors that are
connected to create a solar panel. In order to use semi-
conductor materials, two types of layers, type N (-)
and type P (+) layers are produced via a process known
as doping.
Light particles (photons) hit the type N layer, which
has fve electrons in its outer atomic orbit. Tis causes
one electron to break away towards the P layer, which
has just four electrons in its outer atomic orbit. Tis
is the photovoltaic efect and provides a potential
diference (also referred to as a voltage) across the
solar panel.
By placing wires between the P and N layers, the
solar cell is transformed into a battery with positive
and negative poles. Large quantities of solar cells are
connected with each other through parallel or se-
rial connection and mounted on a surface. Tis new
structure is called solar panel, solar module or pho-
tovoltaic module.
Solar panels are manufactured in three
diferent structures: monocrystal, polycrystal
and thin-flm. Te efciency of the photovol-
taic solar power plants (SPP) difers between
15-20% according to the efciency of the sys-
temand the location of installation.
Te current generated with photovoltaic sys-
tem is Direct Current (DC) and the output
voltage of each module is between 12-1000V.
Below: Solar radiation
pressure map for Turkey.
Adana Cement is located
in the central southern
region of Adana.
Global energy demand rises by 1.6%/yr, while
the population increases by around 1%/yr. The
need for renewable energy sources to satisfy
this increasing demand while implementing
sustainable global environmental policies is
evident for all countries. To this end, Adana
Cement has recently completed the installation
of a new photovoltaic solar power plant that will
provide signifcant energy and CO2 savings in
the coming years.
1400 - 1450kWh/m2
1450 - 1500kWh/m2
1500 - 1550kWh/m2
1550 - 1600kWh/m2
1600 - 1650kWh/m2
1650 - 1700kWh/m2
1700 - 1750kWh/m2
1750 - 1800kWh/m2
1800 - 2000kWh/m2
Above: Adana Cements
499kWp solar power
plant began operations
on 8 May 2013.
Adana Cement
M
A