iz - II mif g v.

1 mu g FGth VWbfhsbgwhk nk eltoif vLfbgw ntoa FG Fiuf / gJiuf nghFtuJ Jiw nrhH rhiy nghFtuJ fHf
t. v. 1 gJiu v. 2 g v. 3 bghU 4 FG fUJiuf/ gJiuf 5 Jiw g 6 FG gJiu 7 Jiw g 8 FG gJiu 9 beLrhiyJiw g 10

3.12

nehff

rhiyfis brgL gf cl gntW ts gfSbfd khtl MafSF xJfgL gwhFiw fhuzkhfjh, 1000 ngfSFnk kf bjhif cs FoU gFfSF nghFtuJ tr brJjuntLbkw mu bfhifia KGikahf bragLj Koaiy vd FG mwJ. vdnt, 1,000 ngfSFnk kf bjhif cs FoU gFfSF nghFtuJ tr brJ bfhLf Fghf xJf brtJ FJ muR gyid brayh vd FG gJiu brwJ.

1996-97 aho ngUJ jlrhiy mikgjfhf %.1900.00 yr xJfgL mbjhif KGtJ gagLjglJ. j aho (19971998) ngUJ jl rhiy mikgjfhf bkhj %.3939.95 yrf xJfgLsd. tW eghL (NABARD) fl cj _ykhf %.3596.35 yrK kW eghL fl cj myhj (Non NABARD) khy muR _ykhf %.343.60 yrf xJfgLsJ. 1996-97- xJfgl ia l el Mo (1997-98) xJfgl ms uL klif l mfkhF. (beLrhiyJiw m.rh.F.v.1219//97-5, eh.2.03.1998)

1996-97, 1997-98 Ma MLf nkhl tof bryjf rhiyf nghLtjF muR (beLrhiy Jiw) nghJkhd xJsJ vW, gagLjgL csJ vW FG mwJ. vdnt, fHf aftu cs gF xJodh gadilJsjh vgij, 1000F nkgl kf bjhif cs FoUf midF nghFtuJ tr brJ bfhLfgljh vgij FG ma UwJ.

1996-97, 1997-98 Ma MLf nkhl tof bryjf rhiyf nghLtjF muR (beLrhiy Jiw) nghJkhd xJsJ. xJodh fHf af tu cs gFf midJ gadilJsd. 1000-F nk kf bjhif bfhl uhkfSF ngUJ tryhj uhkf kW mjfhd fhuzf tUkhW : (iz1)

14 khtlf ngUJ tryhj uhkf vif khtl thahf kLnk bjfgLsJ. uhkf ngUJ tryhj bgafis Flh kLnk mtiw uhkf izF rhiyf jnghija iyia ngUJf Fl aY. afnfg rhiy trf brJ nkY rgjgl tlhu ju eltoif vLf nghFtuJ fHf mYtyffis bjhl ntLbkd bfhL uhkf bga tuf J beLrhiy JiwF eh tiu ilfbgwiy. vdnt muR gJiu nghFtuJ JiwlUJ uhkf brwJ bgafsla goa nfhugLsJ. goa iljwF J Fj g mfgL.

iz - 1
nghFtuJ fHf bga 1 jehL muR nghFtuJ fHf (nry) , nry khtl 2 nry ehkf Gu flYh ntYh Utzhkiy fhu UtS uhkf vif 3 1 1 2 5 3 9 4 1 1 23 3 fhuz 4 fduf ngUJ af jf rhiy triy

1)

2)

jehL muR nghFtuJ fHf (Gu) , Gu

rhiy jik rhjhuz iy ngUJfis aFtjF Vwjhf iy

3)

jehL muR nghFtuJ fHf (nfhaJh) , nfhaJh

nfhit

<nuhL

2 5

ngUJ afFlhd rhiy triy CUF ngUij a Ugnth bjhlJ nkbfhL brynth rhiy tr iy.

kJiu jehL muR nghFtuJ fHf (kJiu) , kJiu

ehfnfh UJef Lf

1 *3 1 5

kJiu khtl 2 uhkfSF ngUJ af eltoif nkbfhsgL tUwJ. 1 uhk ngUJ afjf rhiy triy. fduf ngUJ afjf rhiy triy. jah WJf afgL tUwJ.

* rhiy jik ryhjjh ngUJ af ayhj iy (nghFtuJ Jiw m.rh.F.v.25295/o2/2001-7 eh.01.07.2005.

II. Annexure
(Report's Para No : 1) Action to be taken on the Note/Recommendation of the committee Department of Transport Chozhan Road Transport Corporation
Recommendation no. Para no. Committee Notes/Recommen dation Committee Notes/Recommen dation Committee Notes/ Recommen dation 9 Government recomended to take action for providing road to facilitate bus transportation in villages not having the transportation facilitate. Subject Sl.no

Department Answer

Department Answer

HD's Reply

1)

3.12

5 Committe learnt that Government Policy providing transport facility for habitations having more than 1000 people was not implemented fully due to insufficient funds provided to the District Collectors for development works including road improvements. Hence, Committe recommends to the Government for considering provision of transport facility to habitations having more than 1000 population in particular necessary fund allocation.

6 In the financial year 1996-97 Rs.1900 lakhs has been allocated for improving the bus route roads and the amount has been utilised fully. In financial year (1997-98) Rs.3939.95 lakhs has been allocated for improving the bus routes. This allocation includes Rs.3596.35 lakhs of NABARD loan assistance and Rs.343.6 lakhs of Non-NABARD State Government funds. This allocation in 1997-98 is more than double of the allocation 1996-97 (H&MP note 1219/V/97-5/ Dt:02.03.1998.)

7 Committee has understood that in the financial year 1996-97 & 1997-98 sufficient funds have been allocated for improving the road to facilitate the Motor transportation and the same is fully utilised. committe wants to know that whether the area in the operating jurisdiction has been benefitted due to the above fund allocation and whether the transport facility has been provided for all habitations having more than 1000 population.

8 In the financial year 1996-97 & 1997-98 the Government allocated sufficient funds for improving the road. The area in the operating jurisdiction has been benefitted. The villages having population more than 1000 and not having transport facility and the reasons given below : (Attachment 1)

10 The number of villages not having transportation facilities have been given in 14 districts. The name of the villages are not specified. The present status of the roads can be informed only if the name of the villages are known. These details have been requested from Zonal Transport Offices and the details are not yet received. The name list of villages have been requested from the Transport Department. The reply will be furnished after receipt of name list of villages.

Object

Name of Tranport Corporation

1 1) Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation (Salem) Salem Ltd., Salem Namakkal

Attachment 1 No. of District villages 2 3 1 1 2 5 3 9 4 1 1 23 3 2 5

Reason 4 The road is not suitable for Heavy vehicle transportation

2) Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Villupuram

Villupuram Cuddalore Vellore Tiruvannamalai Kancheepuram Tiruvallur Kovai Erode

The road is not suitable for Bus transportation.

3) Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., Kovai

The road is not suitable for Bus transportation. There is no road continuity and bus turning facility inside the village

Madurai 4) Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Nagercoil Virudhunagar Dindigul

3 1 *3 1 5

Action is being taken for operating buses for 2 villages in Madurai district.The road is not suitable for bus transportation in one village. The road is not suitable for heavy vehiclular transportation. Private mini buses are being operated.

* Buses not operated due to inferior road facility. (Transport Department note 25295/T2/2001-7/ Dt:01.07.2005.)