Ceramics 1 Totem Pole Shaker/Rattle

CATEGORY Pinch Technique: Technique mastery Low Performance At or Below Average At or Above Average
(17+ Points) Pinch method mastery is evident yet minor flaws exist in technique. Flaws are evident in smoothness and consistent thickness. (Broomstick method) (17+ Points) Glazing is even but minor flaws still exist.

Exemplary Performance
(19+ Points) Pinch method is mastered with equal thickness, balance and smooth surface is evident. (Broomstick method)

Earned Points

(10+ Points) Pinch method mastery is (15+ Points) Pinch method not evident. (Broomstick method) Skill mastery is attempted but appears sloppy and inconsistent. major problems exist in technique (Broomstick method)

Glaze

(10+ Points) Glazing is uneven or spotty. Project may be left unglazed. Poor application is evident.

(15+ Points) Glazing is evident but still may be uneven and inconsistent and project has many flaws in the glaze result.

(19+ Points) Glazing is even and consistently applied. No glazing flaws exist.

(10+ Points) Student displays no (15+ Points) Student displays (17+ Points) Student work (19+ Points) Student Idea displays significant original displays unique and original Communication original thinking in form or expression. some attempt at original No evidence of research or planning. Project does not show knowledge of totem culture. thinking in form or expression. Some evidence of research and planning exists. Project shows evidence of idea development and a basic knowledge of totem culture. thinking in form and expression. Research and planning are evident. Idea development is strong in regard to subject matter. Knowledge of totem culture is strong and evident. thinking in form and expression. Thoughtful planning and thorough detail are evident in the work. Knowledge of totem culture is exemplary and is evident in the work.

(10+ Points) Student made little or no (15+ Points) Student made Work Process some attempt to create the /Craftsmanship effort to create their shaker. No sketches and/or notes or resources were collected.

(17+ Points) Student work displays good shaker but the project is not craftsmanship and has well formed and has shown nice detail within significant craftsmanship the project. Some minor problems. Little regard has craftsmanship problems been paid to sketching and/or eixst. Attention has been note taking and resource given to resource collection. collection, note taking and/or sketching. has some funtionality flaws working and has sound clarity. Clarity could be improved.

(19+ Points) Student work is very neatly formed and craftsmanship is excellent. There are no imperfections in the construction and thoughtful details are abundant. Resource collection, notes and/or sketches are excellent. (19+ Points) Shaker is working and has perfect clarity. The ability to produce a quality instrument with great sound is evident in finished product.

Shaker function (10+ Points) Shaker does not function. (15+ Points) Shaker works but (17+ Points) Shaker is
The attempt to produce a working product is weak.