Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
OPIC TWO
Planning System
2012 UMT
Learning Objectives
1. Explain how a firms business strategy shapes its information system 2. Describe the project identification and selection process. 3. Explain the importance of systems development planning and describe planning techniques. 4. Explain what is meant by critical path scheduling and describe the process of creating Gantt charts and network diagrams. 5. Discuss the various types of feasibility analysis and calculate economic feasibility.
2012 UMT Advanced Accounting Information Systems 2
Learning Objective 1
2012 UMT
2012 UMT
Legacy Systems
Use legacy components to help develop an architecture description.
2012 UMT
2012 UMT
Learning Objective 2
2012 UMT
12
2012 UMT
13
2012 UMT
14
The Process of Identifying and Selecting IS Development Projects Top-down source are projects identified by top management or by a diverse steering committee. Bottom-up source are project initiatives stemming from managers, business units, or the development group. The process varies substantially across organizations.
2012 UMT
15
2012 UMT
16
Value chain analysis: the process of analyzing an organizations activities for making products and/or services to determine where value is added and costs are incurred.
2012 UMT
17
2012 UMT
18
2012 UMT
19
2012 UMT
20
One method for deciding among different projects or alternative designs is:
For each requirement or constraint: Score = weight X rating. Each alternative: sum scores across requirements/constraints. Alternative with highest score wins.
21 21
2012 UMT
22
Learning Objective 3
Explain the importance of systems development planning and describe planning techniques.
2012 UMT
23
2012 UMT
24
2012 UMT
26
2012 UMT
27
PLANNING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Two types of systems development plans are needed:
- Individual project plans developed by the project teams. - A master plan developed by the IS steering committee.
2012 UMT
28
PLANNING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Two types of systems development plans are needed:
- Individual project plans developed by the project teams. - A master plan developed by the IS steering committee.
2012 UMT
29
2012 UMT
30
PLANNING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Two types of systems development plans are needed:
- Individual project plans developed by the project teams. - A master plan developed by the IS steering committee.
2012 UMT
31
It also provides:
Status of projects in process. Prioritization of planned projects and criteria for establishing priorities. Timetables for development.
2012 UMT Advanced Accounting Information Systems 32
Planning horizon:
About a 3-year horizon. With updates at least 23 times/yeareven more frequently in some companies.
Planning techniques
Two techniques for scheduling and monitoring systems development activities are:
Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Gantt Charts
2012 UMT
34
Planning techniques
Two techniques for scheduling and monitor systems development activities are:
Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Gantt Charts
2012 UMT
35
PLANNING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT A PERT diagram requires that all activities in a project be identified along with the activities that precede and follow them. These activities are used to draw a PERT diagram, which consists of a network of:
Arrowsrepresenting activities that require time and resources. Nodesrepresenting completion and initiation of activities.
2012 UMT Advanced Accounting Information Systems 36
PLANNING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT The critical path in a PERT diagram is the path requiring the greatest amount of time. If an activity on the critical path is delayed, the whole project is delayed. Resources may be shifted to the critical path to reduce the delay.
2012 UMT
37
Example
Activity A B C D D Average time 2 Weeks 8 Weeks 4 Weeks 3 Weeks 2 Weeks
A and B can take place simultaneously. C follows A. D is to follow A and can be completed Independently of C. E follows B and C. Calculate the earliest event times, latest event times, slack times and the duration of the critical path.
2012 UMT
39
Network diagram
2012 UMT
40
Planning techniques
Two techniques for scheduling and monitor systems development activities are:
Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Gantt Charts
2012 UMT
41
1 Design birdhouse Buy wood & nails Buy paint Build roof Build base Nail together Paint & decorate Sell
2012 UMT
Period 5 6
10
43
Gantt charts
Show the sequence and duration of each activity within a project
The bar for each activity runs from the start date to the completion date of that activity
2012 UMT Advanced Accounting Information Systems 44
Learning Objective 4
Explain what is meant by critical path scheduling and describe the process of creating Gantt charts and network diagrams.
2012 UMT
45
Network diagrams
Show task dependencies. Do not show time overlap, but show parallelism. Show slack time in boxes.
46 46
2012 UMT
47 47
2012 UMT
48
Calculating Expected Time Durations using PERT PERT (Program Evaluation Review
Technique) a technique that uses optimistic, pessimistic, and realistic time estimates to calculate the expected time for a particular task.
2012 UMT
49
Learning Objective 5
Discuss the various types of feasibility analysis and calculate economic feasibility.
2012 UMT
52
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
During the systems analysis phase, a feasibility study (aka, a business case) is prepared and is updated during the remaining steps in the SDLC. The extent of the feasibility study depends on the size and nature of the system. Feasibility team should include:
2012 UMT
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
The feasibility study and its updates are used by the steering committee as the project proceeds to decide whether to:
Terminate the project Proceed Proceed if specific problems are resolved
2012 UMT
54
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Five aspects need to be considered during a feasibility study:
Technical feasibility
Is the technology there to do it?
Operational feasibility
Do we have people who can do it, and will it get used?
Legal feasibility
Does it comply with legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations?
Scheduling feasibility
Can it be done in time?
Economic feasibility
Will the benefits exceed the costs?
2012 UMT Advanced Accounting Information Systems 55
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Calculating economic feasibility costs and benefits
Economic feasibility is probably the most important and frequently analyzed aspect. This examination requires a careful investigation of costs and benefits. It typically uses a capital budgeting model that considers:
2012 UMT
Cost savings and other benefits Initial outlay costs Operating costs Other costs
Advanced Accounting Information Systems 56
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
When possible, benefits and costs should be estimated and included even if they are not easily quantifiable. If some costs and benefits cannot be accurately estimated, they should at least be listed, along with the likelihood of their occurrence and their expected impact.
2012 UMT
57
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Benefits might include:
Cost savings. Improved customer service, productivity, decision making, or data processing. Better management control. Increased job satisfaction and employee morale.
A rigorous cost-benefit analysis is a good strategy for ensuring the benefit of new information technology exceeds the cost.
2012 UMT
58
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Costs might include:
Equipment costs
Initial outlay plus ongoing operating costs.
Software costs
Costs of acquiring, maintaining, supporting, and operating.
Site preparation costs. Installation and conversion costs. Supplies. Overhead. Financial charges.
Makes up 6575% of the organizations system efforts.
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Capital budgeting
Most organizations use a capital budgeting return on investment technique to evaluate the economic merits of different system alternatives. There are three commonly used techniques:
Payback period
Calculates the number of years before the new savings from the project equal the initial cost of the investment. Select projects with shorter payback periods.
2012 UMT
60
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Capital Budgeting
Most organizations use a capital budgeting return on investment technique to evaluate the economic merits of different system alternatives. There are three commonly used techniques:
Payback period Net present value (NPV)
Calculates and sums the discounted future cash flows of the costs and benefits. Select projects with higher positive NPV.
2012 UMT Advanced Accounting Information Systems 61
FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
Capital Budgeting
Most organizations use a capital budgeting return on investment technique to evaluate the economic merits of different system alternatives. There are three commonly used Calculates the effective interest rate techniques: that would result in
a net present value of zero for the project. Payback period Select projects with higher IRRs. Net present value (NPV) Internal rate of return (IRR)
2012 UMT
62
End of Topic 2
2012 UMT
63