Gravity Nullified

Quartz Crystals Charged by High Frequency Currents Lose Their Weight

Fig 1. The gravitation nullifier is shown in this illustration. The quartz crystal may be seen supporting a 55 pound weight. Dr.Kows y is shown in a top coat because of the temperature at which the e!periments were performed. Although some remarkable achievements have been made with short-wave low power Transmitter, radio experts and amateurs have recently decided that short-wave transmission had reached its ultimate and that no vital improvement would be made in this time. A short time ago, however, two young European experimenters working with ultra shortwaves, have made a discovery that promises to be of primary importance to the scientific world.

The discovery was made about six weeks ago in a newly established central laboratory of the Nessartsaddin- erke in !arredein, "oland, by !r. #owsky and Engineer $rost. hile experimenting with the constants of very short waves, carried on by means of %uart& resonators, a piece of %uart& which was used, suddenly showed a clearly altered appearance. 't was easily seen that in the center of the crystal, especially when a constant temperature not exceeding ten degrees (. )*+ degrees $ahrenheit, was maintained, milky cloudiness appeared which gradually developed to complete opacity. The experiments of !r.-eissner, of the Telefunken (o., along similar lines, according to which %uart& crystals, sub.ected to high fre%uency currents clearly showed air currents which led to the construction of a little motor based on this principle. A week of eager experimenting finally led !r. #owsky and Engineer $rost to the explanation of the phenomenon, and further experiments showed the unexpected possibilities for technical uses of the discovery. /ome statements must precede the explanation. 't is known at least in part, that %uart& and some other crystals of similar atomic nature, have the property when exposed to potential excitation in a definite direction, of stretching and contracting, and if one uses rapidly changing potentials, the crystals will change the electric waves into mechanical oscillations. This piezo- electric effect, shown in 0ochelle salt crystals by which they may be made into sound-producing devices such as loud speakers or reversibly into microphones, also shows the results in this direction. This effect was clearly explained in August, 123* 0adio News and !ecember, 1212 Electrical Experimenter. These oscillations are extremely small, but have nevertheless their technical use in a %uart& crystal wave-meter and in maintaining a constant wave length in radio transmitters.

This schematic diagram of the e!periment is shown in this illustration. The high frequency oscillator has been omitted for clarity. 4y a special arrangements of the excitation of the crystal in various directions, it may be made to stretch or increase in length and will not return to its original si&e.

Fig ". This shows how the quartz crystal lost weight when sub#ected to the high frequency current. The original crystal was balanced on the scale. 't seems as if a dispersal of electrons from a molecule resulted, which as it is irreversible, changes the entire structure of the crystal, so that it cannot be restored to its former condition. The stretching out, as we may term this strange property of the crystal, explains the reason for its transparency. At the same time a change takes place in its specific gravity. Testing it on the balance showed that after connecting the crystal to the high tension current, the arm of the balance on which the crystal with the electrical connections tests rode into air. The illustration$ of Fig ". shows this e!periment. This pointed the way for further investigation and the determination of how far the reduction of the specific gravity could be carried out. 4y the use of greater power, finally to the extent of several kilowatts and longer exposure to the action, it was found eventually that from a little crystal, * by 3 by 1.* millimeters, a nontransparent white body measuring about ten centimeters on the side resulted, or increased about 3+ times in length on any side )see $ig 5.,

The transformed crystal was so light that it carried the whole apparatus with itself upwards, along with the weight of twenty-five kilograms )** lbs, suspended from it and floating freely in the air. 6n exact measurement and calculation, which on account of the excellent apparatus in the !arredein laboratory could be readily carried out, it was found that the specific gravity was reduced to a greater amount than the change in volume would indicate,

'ts weight had become practically negative. There can be no doubt that a beginning has been made toward overcoming gravitation. 't is to be noted, however, that the law of conservation of energy is absolutely unchanged. The energy employed in treating the crystal, appears as the counter effect of gravitation. Thus the riddle of gravitation is not fully solved as yet, and the progress of experiments will be followed further. 't is, however, the first time that experimentation with gravitation, which hitherto has been beyond the pale of all such research, has become possible, and it seems as if there were a way discovered at last to explain the interrelations of gravity with electric and magnetic forces, which connection, long sought for, has never been demonstrated.

Fig %. This illustration shows the relative sizes of the crystal before and after the e!periment. &t is appro!imately twenty times its original length on any side.

The Ko s!y"Frost #evice Was a Free"$nergy %yste&'

()*** +ill #onavan hen ' initially reviewed the article for The Antigravity 7andbook titled, 89ravity Nullified:, ' didn;t do an in-depth analysis. ' thought it was interesting source material, but for some reason ' didn;t really get into the article and pick it apart. "erhaps it was because my attention became diverted by the allegation in the 6ctober 123< issue of /cience and 'nvention that the previous article, which appeared in /eptember, was a hoax. hen ' recently !'! do a review of the article, ' noticed that the efficiency was rather high, approaching =5>. 't seemed that the application of this technology was doable? after all, this efficiency was higher than .et and rocket propulsion. The figures seemed to hang together, unlike something you would expect from a hoax. /o ' wondered how the later experiment by @erry 9allimore )published in the "A(E Newsletter, would stack up, and ' plugged the formula into an excel spreadsheet. ' expected the system to break unity at a rather low fre%uency, probably at approximately 5++ 7&. 4ut at the fre%uency @erry was using, the efficiency works out

to 15=>. That fre%uency was <<< #7&. /o whether he knew it or not, he had a free energy device. hat was the efficiency at 5++ 7&.A 't turns out to be 3<B,1*=>. The lift capacity in kg works out to be 32.1=<* with a power input of .ust one watt. ' can remember in a video that Tom 4earden did titled, 8The Cost Dnified $ield Theory of @ames (lerk -axwell:, he mentioned that it would be possible to levitate a battleship with a flashlight battery. ' always wondered what the phase con.ugate material was in this case. After all, it would need to be a media, which is highly stressed, nonlinear, and would possess a high dielectric constant. hen ' interviewed @erry 9allimore in Cos (ruces back in the B+;s before he passed away, he mentioned that the dielectric constant of the material 8went through the roof.: 7e estimated that the constant was in the neighborhood of ten million. That;s a very wealthy neighborhood. /o it could have been phase con.ugate material. 't could also be 4iefield-4rown material. 4ack in 12B5, when ' did the 4iefield4rown formula, ' noticed that a sort of breakeven point is reached at a dielectric constant of B+++-2+++. At the time, ' considered that the sintered barium titanates would be the way to go if one wanted to get a device to 8lift-off: of the lab bench. ' also knew that there were materials that went above that, but they were highly nonlinear in respect to their operating temperature, and their 8window: was fairly narrow, about 1+ degrees (. Anything above or below this temperature results in a severe drop in the #. hat was not generally known was that Townsend 4rown experimented with a pulsating high voltage field, as well as pulsating low-fre%uency magnetic fields at right angles to the applied electric field potential. hat does this doA ell, it turns the space between the plates into a wave-guide. And the action of the pulsating fields at right angles to each other is e%uivalent to the application to a low-fre%uency electromagnetic wave. as 4rown aware of the #owsky-$rost ExperimentA 't really depends on his maga&ine subscriptions. 'f he subscribed to /cience and 'nvention in that time frame, or if he had access to back issues in the *+;s when he resumed some of his experimentation, then he may have known about it. 's there a connection between the #owsky-$rost and 4rown;s experimentsA ' would say yes. hen ' originally did the 4iefield-4rown formula, ' 8invented: a 4iefield4rown constant as a fudge factor to make the formula work. 't represents a missing variable. hat is that variableA ';m betting that it;s the input fre%uency, or perhaps T 6 synergistic variables, perhaps representing an input of electromagnetic energy at right angles to the electric field. The original formula is still applicable to a !( field at high voltages, but the new formula would combine the characteristics of both effects. A hybrid formula would optimi&e this, and may lead toward a new propulsion concept. 'n the original article, 89ravity Nullified:, they mentioned that only %uart& and 0ochelle salt crystals were considered. Are there othersA Ees, there would be. hat would the re%uirements beA ell, it would need to be a dielectric, and transparent to 0$ energy. -etallic crystals are out. (rystals, which are semi conductive, may or may not work, depending on whether or not they remain semi conductive A$TE0 the expansion process is completed. After these criteria are met, there are thousands of materials, which are good candidates for investigation. They would not be limited to %uart& and 0ochelle salt. hen Edison began his search for a

suitable filament material, some of the most bi&arre suggestions seemed to work the best. 't may be so once again. As an example, why limit the investigation to inorganic crystalsA 6rganic compounds may prove to be much more viable. 6nce a real civilian research program is started, there will no doubt be %uite a few surprises. ' will now include my commentary, which originally appeared after the 89ravity Nullified: article, which ' re-released lately, as well as a spreadsheet analysis of the #owsky-$rost Experiment. 7ere;s the reprintF /ome Notes on The Article G3+++ 4ill !onavan "lease note that the crystal increased its si&e 8twenty times its original length on any side:. The density decrease would be the cube of that, or B+++. That;s %uite a decrease. According to the $unk H agnall;s /tandard 0eference Encyclopedia, %uart& has a specific gravity of 3.I*. That means that the specific gravity went from 3.I* to =.=13*x 1+-5. Another thing that was not mentioned in the article was the mass of the crystal. /ince most %uart& has a specific gravity of 3.I*, and the volume is known )*x3x1.* millimeters, or 1* cubic millimeters, a calculation for that can be made. There are 1+++ cubic millimeters in a cubic centimeter, or 1+x1+x1+ millimeters. /o, we divide 1* cubic millimeters by 1+++, or .+1* cubic centimeters. 6ne cubic centimeter of %uart& will weigh 3.I* grams. /o therefore, .+1* cubic centimeters will weigh .+=2<* grams. Now, we need to know the lift factor. 'n the article, we see that 8the transformed crystal was so light that it carried the whole apparatus with itself upwards, along with the weight of twenty-five kilograms )** lbs., /uspended from it and floating free in the air.: ' previously determined the mass of the crystal to be .+=2<* grams. Assuming that the 3* kilograms did not include the mass of the crystal, the total weight then is 3*,+++.+=2<* grams. The lift factor is 3*,+++.+=2<* divided by .+=2<* or I3B2=1.B1<I1. That;s a fairly large number. This factor is applicable in both English and -etric systems. /o, how much propulsive power does a 1-pound crystal haveA 't would amount to over =15 T6N/. There seems to be a discrepancy between the above article and the later repeat of this experiment by @erry 9allimore. @erry;s experiment seemed to indicate that there was only a lift factor of B++. hy is there so much of a discrepancyA 't might have something to do with the %uality of the %uart&, or the method of 8conditioning: the %uart& during the expansion process. 6r, possibly an unknown factor, which could be discovered when the experiment is repeated. Next, we need to calculate the power density, in watts per cubic centimeter. The volume of the crystal is .+1* cubic centimeters. "utting one watt into this volume would result in a power density of II.II watts per cubic centimeter. 4ut, in the article we see that, 8by the use of greater power, finally to the extent of several kilowatts and longer exposure to the action, it was found eventually that from a little crystal, * by 3

by 1.* millimeters, a non-transparent white body measuring about ten centimeters on the side resulted...: /everal kilowatts indeed. /o, what would the power density of T7AT beA ell, that would be approximately <+++ watts divided by an initial volume of .+1* cubic centimeters, or 5II,III.I< watts per cubic centimeter. 4ut, let;s assume that the power density applied is constant, and varies during the expansion to accommodate a variable volume. Cet us also assume that the <+++ watts is applied A$TE0 the B+++F1 expansion, and work the process backwards. <+++ watts applied to B+++ x .+1*, or 13+ cubic centimeters comes to a power density of *B.== watts per cubic centimeter. 'f we assume that this density is constant, then the beginning amount will be .B<52* watts applied to the crystal. This will be slowly ramped up as the volume increased to <+++ watts. Next, we need to calculate the efficiency. To pull up against Earth;s gravity field is e%uivalent to accelerating the mass =3 feet per second per second. This **-pound weight has 1<I+ foot-pounds impressed upon it to keep it above the lab bench. The conversion factor for foot-pounds per second to watts is 1.=*I. This would amount to 1<I+ foot pounds multiplied by 1.=*I, or 3=BI.*I watts. Therefore, the efficiency would be the output, 3=BI.*I watts divided by <+++ watts in, or =5.+2=> efficiency. That;s %uite an impressive efficiency, compared to rockets or .et engines. This would amount to 13<.3< watts per pound. 7ow much would it take for a mass of 1+,+++ poundsA 't comes to approximately 1.3< megawatts, or 3*.5* amps at *+,+++ volts. That;s doable. Especially if "aul 4rown;s resonant nuclear cell is used. hen ' ran the results through an Excel spreadsheet of the 9allimore experiment, ' noticed that the efficiency seemed to 8break unity: at low fre%uencies. 6ne model seemed to suggest 5++ 7& and lower would yield anomalous results. Jery anomalous, with efficiencies ranging way above 1+++>. 's this what Tom 4earden was explaining in 8The Cost Dnified $ield Theory of @ames (lerk -axwell:A Kuite possibly so. There could be 5-wave mixing going on, and the medium is ELT0E-ECE nonlinear and stressed. -aybe when the experiment is repeated we can determine this. Conclusion 's this a hoaxA ' don;t think so. ' know there was a later article that appeared in the 6ctober issue of /cience and 'nvention that claimed this, but since @erry 9allimore claimed that he obtained positive results using similar procedures, ' tend to think that the hoax claim is in itself a hoax. 't seems that something got out, that wasn;t supposed to 9ET out. 'f 9allimore;s experiment is genuine, then who knows how far this technology could have been developed since its inception in 123<A 'f it took a decade to develop chemical rockets to get to the moon, then two decades would not be unreasonable. And what happened in 125<A The first 8D$6 flaps:M -y, what a coincidence. There was a mention by @erry 9allimore that the dielectric constant of the material 8went through the roof:. 7e estimated that it went to 1+ million or above. /o the

4iefield-4rown effect could also be responsible for this phenomenon as well. 's this the gravitational analog of a transistorA "ossibly. 'n the 4iefield-4rown effect, the %uestion was raised when ' did the chapter for the Antigravity 7andbook whether or not the field was completely contained within the dielectric or whether it was 8leaky:. ' assumed that it was completely self-contained, and that there was no way to get it to propagate outside the dielectric. 4ut, you know what happens with assumptions. hat if there is a way to get a field flow to go around the shipA ell, then it;s conceivable to get something that looks like a 8warp drive.: 6r it;s possible to produce an artificial wormhole and get a 8/targate.: ho knows how far they could have gone with this technologyM $inally, if this experiment, which obviously has politically incorrect overtones, is repeated, perhaps the commercial exploitation of space can finally be reali&ed. ' believe that the results of this experiment are the key to man;s future in space, perhaps whether man has a future in space at all.

7ere is the spreadsheetF atts -ass Expansion )kg., > 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++ 3+++ * =++

$re%uency 12+++++ 1B+++++ 1<+++++ 1I+++++ 1*+++++ 15+++++ 1=+++++ 13+++++ 11+++++ <<<+++ *++++ 5++++ =++++ 3++++ 1++++ 2+++ B+++ <+++ I+++

#g Cift 13.3IB5311 13.2* 1=.<11<I5< 15.*IB<* 1*.*5 1I.I* 1<.2=+<I23 12.53* 31.12+2+21 =+ 5II.3 *B3.<* <<< 11I*.* 3==1 3*2+ 321=.<* ===+ =BB*

Efficiency> *B.**BI5*2 I1.B112+5 I*.55<B2B5 I2.*=B=23 <5.1<53B5B <2.5<355B B*.*B*<1=3 23.<1<B*I 1+1.15I<*3 15=.12=I 333*.33B*5 3<B1.*=*IB =<+B.<1535 **I=.+<1=I 1113I.153< 13=I3.=B+B 1=2+<.I<B5 1*B25.5B2I 1B*5=.*<13

Dnity 0atio +.*B**BI5I +.I1B112+5 +.I*55<B2B +.I2*=B=23 +.<51<53B* +.<25<355B +.B**B*<1= +.23<1<B*I 1.+115I<*3 1.5=12=I 33.3*33B*5 3<.B1*=*IB =<.+B<1535 **.I=+<1=I 111.3I153< 13=.I3=B+B 1=2.+<I<B5 1*B.255B2I 1B*.5=*<13

3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++ 3+++

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

=++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++ =++

*+++ 5+++ =+++ 1+++ 2++ B++ <++ I++ *++ 5++ =++ 3++ 1++ 2+ B+ <+ I+ *+ 5+ =+ 3+ 1+ 2

5II3 333*3.3B*5 *B3<.* 3<B1*.=*IB <<<+ =<+B<.1535 3==1+ 1113I1.53< 3*2++ 13=I3=.B+B 321=<.* 1=2+<I.<B5 ===++ 1*B255.B2I =BB*+ 1B*5=*.<13 5II3+ 333*33.B*5 *B3<* 3<B1*=.*IB <<<++ =<+B<1.535 11I**+ **I=+<.1=I 3==1++ 1113I15.3< 3*2+++ 13=I3=B.+B 321=<* 1=2+<I<.B5 ===+++ 1*B255B.2I =BB*++ 1B*5=*<.13 5II3++ 333*33B.*5 *B3<*+ 3<B1*=*.IB <<<+++ =<+B<15.35 11I**++ **I=+<1.=I 3==1+++ 1113I153.< 3*2++++ 13=I3=B+.B

333.*33B*5 3<B.1*=*IB =<+.B<1535 1113.I153< 13=I.3=B+B 1=2+.<I<B5 1*B2.55B2I 1B*5.=*<13 333*.33B*5 3<B1.*=*IB =<+B.<1535 **I=.+<1=I 1113I.153< 13=I3.=B+B 1=2+<.I<B5 1*B25.5B2I 1B*5=.*<13 333*3.3B*5 3<B1*.=*IB =<+B<.1535 **I=+.<1=I 1113I1.53< 13=I3=.B+B

Conclusion"again Are these figures for realA ' assure you they are. ' can;t stress enough that there is a real phenomenon going on here, which is .ust waiting to be developed. The successful repetition of the experiment by @erry 9allimore blows the claims of the original experiment being a hoax right out of the water. 'n a later paper, ' will be getting the original source material from 0adio Dmchau if it is still available. ' have contacts, which can translate 9erman, and can be trusted. hy did /cience and 'nvention claim that it was a hoaxA ' think they were persuaded to do so, and not because of the antigravity aspects. There is a pernicious pursuit by those in power to keep this society on a short leash in regard to its energy resources. 't;s all about control. 'f this technology were allowed to develop back in 123<, then we would have coloni&ed the solar system by now, and possibly the nearby star systems. 4ut whom would the penny-ante despots order aroundA 6ur political leadership has turned Earth into a prison planet.

,sn-t it ti&e to brea! out.