Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
21.310
4
mol/g). The F value of the HY zeolite
(1.3) is two times larger than those of K10, CDP and
SZ3 samples, while for the CSPWsalt it attains a value
(89.1) more than two orders of magnitude larger than
those calculated for the other systems.
3.5. Liquid-phase alkylation of benzene with
benzylchloride
The activity data of catalysts in the liquid-phase
alkylation of benzene are compared in Table 6 in
terms of kinetic constant of the rate of benzylchloride
conversion (K
C7H7Cl
), whilst selectivity data are not
reported as under the adopted conditions, the fraction
of di-alkylated products was comparable for all the
systems ranging between 10% and 20%.
K10, CDP and HY catalysts show an analogous low
activity as indicated by the similar value of the kinetic
constant (1.610
3
2.610
3
s
1
). The SZ3 catalyst
is much more active, the value of its kinetic constant
(2.110
2
s
1
) being larger by one order of magni-
tude than that of previous systems. At least the CSPW
salt is still the most active catalyst with a value of
k
C7H7Cl
(7.710
2
s
1
) which is ca. four times larger
than that of the SZ3 sample and almost one order of
magnitude larger than those of K10, CDP and HY
zeolite.
4. Discussion
4.1. Mathematical analysis of NH
3
-TPD spectra and
acid strength distribution
It is generally recognized that ammonia is an
excellent probe molecule for testing the acidic proper-
ties of solid catalysts as its strong basicity and small
molecular size allow for detection of acidic sites
located also into very narrow pores [1113,1521].
Generally, IR spectroscopy [17,18], calorimetric
[13,16,20] and TPD [1113,1521] techniques are
employed to achieve information on the interaction
of NH
3
with solid acids. Although there is a wide-
spread use of TPD in the studies of the surface acidity
of solid catalysts, it is worth noting that the NH
3
-TPD
spectra are often poorly resolved and then either
experimental artefacts, such as a change in the activa-
tion and/or saturation treatments, or curve deconvolu-
tion methods are needed to get insights on site
distribution and heat of desorption [1113]. Then,
on the basis of complementary characterization
results, a fairly reliable interpretation of the TPD
pattern of ammonia from solid acid catalysts has also
been attained. Indeed, desorption peaks with maxi-
mum in the range 180250, 280330 and 3805008C
are currently attributed to NH
3
chemisorbed on weak,
medium and strong acid sites, respectively, being yet
not possible to discriminate between Brnsted and
Lewis acidity [1113,1621]. Nevertheless, such stu-
dies prevalently focused on the characterization of
zeolitic materials [1121]; namely, on the basis of a
qualitative comparison of the NH
3
-TPD spectral fea-
tures, the effects of various factors (e.g., chemical
composition, structure, Al/Si ratio, activation tem-
Table 5
Activity data of solid acid catalysts in CH
3
OH dehydration
Catalyst Conversion
(%)
Specific activity
(10
4
mol/g)
F
K10 6.0 1.6 0.6
CDP 6.0 1.6 0.5
SZ3 8.5 2.3 0.6
CSPW 77.0 20.5 89.1
HY 80.0 21.3 1.3
Table 6
Kinetic constant (k
C7H7CI
) of the benzene alkylation reaction on
solid acid catalysts
Catalyst k
C7H7CI
(s
1
)
K10 1.6E3
CDP 2.6E3
SZ3 2.1E2
CSPW 7.7E2
HY 2.1E3
132 F. Arena et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 170 (1998) 127137
perature, etc.) on the surface acidity of this class of
solids have been assessed [1621]. By contrast, cata-
lysts with different chemical composition and struc-
tural properties (Table 1) are considered in this case;
then a complete rationalization of their NH
3
-TPD
patterns on the basis of peaks shape (Fig. 1) and T
d
values (Table 2) appear rather difcult. In order to
overcome the approximations of a purely qualitative
comparison between the NH
3
-TPD patterns of the
different systems, such experimental curves were
analysed by a mathematical tting program and
deconvoluted into Gauss functions, on the assumption
of a normal distribution of the desorption activation
energies arising from a corresponding heterogeneity
sites distribution [1113]. Namely, it was found that
all the experimental NH
3
-TPD proles (Fig. 1)
resulted fromthe contribution of three Gauss functions
corresponding to three types (i.e., weak, medium and
strong) of sites from which NH
3
is released. For all the
systems this deconvolution analysis provides a very
accurate (r
2
>0.99) tting of the experimental curves as
shown in Fig. 4. Furthermore, according to Karge and
coworkers [11,12] assuming independent rst-order
kinetic for NH
3
desorption from each type of site, n,
with respect to coverage (rate
des.,n
=k
n
; where
k=Aexp(E
d
/RT) and rate
des.,tot
=
n
(rate
des.,n
))
and a constant value of the pre-exponential factor,
A, equal to 2.510
5
s
1
, the distribution of the activa-
tion energies for desorption of NH
3
from the various
sites has been calculated. The distribution curves of
the energy of desorption of all the catalysts are shown
in Fig. 5, while the results of the computational
analysis are summarized in Table 7 in terms of most
probable activation energy of desorption (E
d
), width
of distribution (), percentage population (A) and
concentration of acid sites (C). In spite of the hetero-
geneity of the catalytic systems, the analogous values
of E
d
for the same type of sites in the different
catalysts (Table 7) suggest that under the adopted
experimental conditions the desorption process is
not signicantly affected by intraparticle molecular
diffusion phenomena [1113,16]. In fact, such a
Fig. 4. Deconvolution analysis results of the NH
3
-TPD spectra: (a)
K10, (b) CDP, (c) SZ3, (d) CSPWand (e) HY zeolite. Legend: (&)
experimental data; (- - -) calculated curves for desorption from
three different types of sites; () theoretical curve of overall
desorption.
Fig. 5. Calculated distributions of the activation energy of
desorption of ammonia from three types of sites: (a) K10, (b)
CDP, (c) SZ3, (d) CSPW and (e) HY zeolite.
F. Arena et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 170 (1998) 127137 133
method was already applied to the analysis of the
NH
3
-TPD and Py-TPD spectra providing information
on desorption activation energies and population of
acidic sites of H-mordenites [11], H-Y [12] and Na-Y
zeolites [13].
Fig. 5 shows for the montmorillonite K10
(Fig. 5(a)) and pillared clay CDP (Fig. 5(b)) samples
the predominance of weak and medium sites, their
overall contribution being ca. 80%, and a relative low
concentration of strong sites in both samples equal to
ca. 20%. The SZ3 catalyst (Fig. 5(c)) bears a relatively
stronger surface acidity [6,7] as the population of
strong sites rises to ca. 35% mostly at the expense
of weak ones whose contribution lowers to 20%.
According to literature data the NH
3
-TPD pattern of
the HY zeolite (Fig. 1(e)) features one prominent
desorption peak [12,13,18] whose maximum value
(3068C) is comparable with that found (2702808C)
by other authors for analogous systems [12] and
considerably shifted to higher T (1001508C) with
respect to that of less acidic Na-exchanged Y zeolites
[13,18]. The deconvolution of this spectrum into three
Gauss functions [12,13] and also their attribution on
the basis of their E
d
values (Table 7) to weak (~77 kJ/
mol), medium (~ 90 kJ/mol) and strong (~103 kJ/
mol) acid sites [1113,1821] is in very good agree-
ment with previous ndings. Then, this system should
be characterized by the lowest percentage of strong
acid sites (ca. 4%) counterbalanced by the largest
concentration (ca. 88%) of medium sites
[12,13,15,18]. The CSPW sample is characterized
by the largest population of strong acid sites (59%)
reecting mostly in a lower concentration of weak (ca.
15%) ones [8,9]. On the basis of these ndings, the
following acidity scale relative to the concentration of
weak, medium and strong sites (Table 7) can be
drawn:
``Weaksites'' CSPWK10<SZ3<CDP ~ HY
``Mediumsites'' CSPWK10<CDP<SZ3HY
``Strongsites'' CSPW<HY ~K10CDP<SZ3
Although the modelling of the NH
3
-TPD spectra
allows for a reliable understanding and comparison
of the acid properties of the catalysts, both in terms of
strength, distribution and concentration of sites, it is
evident that no discrimination between B and L acid
sites can still be made on the basis of NH
3
-TPD
results.
4.2. TPD patterns of various probe molecules and
nature of acid sites
In contrast to ammonia, both experimental results
and theoretical analysis proved that desorption of
pyridine is clearly limited by transport limitations
in microporous solids and for this reason it is not a
suitable probe molecule for the assessment of acid-site
strength and density by the TPD method [16,17].
Indeed, our experimental results signal remarkable
discrepancies, mostly in quantitative terms, in the
evaluation of the surface acidity when pyridine
(Table 3) or ammonia are used as probe molecules
(Table 2). In fact, assuming the same chemisorption
stoichiometry [27] for NH
3
and C
5
H
5
N, with the
exception of the CSPW salt providing the same gure
for pyridine and ammonia desorption (33 mmol/g), for
all the other systems the number of acid sites tested by
pyridine adsorption results much lower than that (20
45%) obtained by NH
3
-TPD data. The reason of such
marked differences must be found both in the different
molecular size of the probe molecules [16,17,20] as
Table 7
Parameters of acidity distribution in solid acid catalysts from analysis of NH
3
-TPD spectra
Sample Weak sites Medium sites Strong sites
E
d
(kJ/mol)
A (%) C
(mmol/g)
E
d
(kJ/mol)
A (%) C
(mmol/g)
E
d
(kJ/mo l)
A (%) C
(mmol/g )
K10 76.0 2.1 30.4 76 88.0 4.1 47.3 118 103.1 4.4 22.3 56
CDP 75.9 2.0 35.4 109 88.0 4.0 46.6 144 103.4 4.2 18.0 55
SZ3 76.0 2.0 20.3 83 87.2 4.3 44.2 182 105.1 4.8 35.5 146
CSPW 76.0 2.0 14.6 5 90.5 3.6 28.1 9 104.0 3.9 58.8 19
HY 76.6 2.0 7.7 109 90.2 5.4 88.6 1254 102.8 5.2 3.7 52
134 F. Arena et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 170 (1998) 127137
well as in the geometry of pyridine chemisorption
[16,17]. For the CSPW sample, likely possessing an
``open'' structure, the acid sites should be located at
the surface, being accessible at all also to pyridine
molecules. Whereas, the fraction of acid sites located
in the micropores of solids like K10, CDP, SZ3 and
HY zeolite could result partially inaccessible for
pyridine adsorption preventing the full surface satura-
tion. The nature of acid sites can also contribute to
hinder pyridine chemisorption. In fact, while no spe-
cic conguration is required by the formation of the
pyridinium ion on Brnsted sites, coordinated pyri-
dine interacts with its electron pair on Lewis centres in
a conguration perpendicular to the surface sites [17]
implying larger diffusion restrictions in the case of
microporous solids [17]. Furthermore, taking into
account the fact that pyridinium ions tend to decom-
pose readily above 2008C, being less stable than
coordinated pyridine [17], the spectrum of the CSPW
sample essentially monitors a prevalence of Brnsted-
type acidity [8,9], while those of K10, CDP and SZ3
[6,7,28] catalysts signal mostly a Lewis-type acidity.
The spectrum of the HY zeolite the only bearing two
resolved peaks at 2648C and 5558C, could signal a
balanced distribution of Brnsted and Lewis acid sites.
However, the occurrence of strong diffusional phe-
nomena coupled with the peculiarity of the desorption
mechanism of pyridine froma zeolitic matrix enabling
the transformation of pyridinium ion into coordinated
pyridine upon heating at T>4008C [12,17] could
account for the occurrence of the high temperature
peak (Fig. 2).
The modest benzene adsorption capacity of K10
and CDP catalysts (Table 4) strongly supports the
view that such systems possess a similar low concen-
tration of Brnsted acid sites enabling benzene
adsorption via the preferential formation of a -bond-
ing between aromatic ring and surface protons (at
geometry of adsorption) [22,23,27]. Although ben-
zene adsorption of the SZ3 sample is larger than that
of the previous catalysts (Table 4), the concentration
of protonic acid sites in this system represents only a
small fraction (ca. 15%) of the total surface acidity
[6,7,28]. By contrast, the CSPW sample adsorbs an
amount of benzene even larger than the number of acid
sites monitored by NH
3
and C
5
H
5
N adsorption
because of the additional adsorption on Cs
ions
[22,24]. HY zeolite exhibits the largest benzene
adsorption capacity (Table 4) resulting in an amount
equal to that of pyridine adsorption. On this account,
since the same molecular size of benzene and pyridine
should imply analogous molecular restrictions, it is
likely that sites chemisorbing pyridine are the same
involved in benzene adsorption, being essentially of
Brnsted-type [14,22,23,27]. Although the maximum
of benzene desorption for the HY zeolite is the highest
in the series (see Table 4) the broad peak shape
(Fig. 3) along with its poor concentration of strong
acid sites (see Table 7) [14,18] points to the marked
inuence of diffusional effects on the maximum posi-
tion, while, the high T
d
value and the narrower ben-
zene desorption prole of the CSPW sample
undoubtedly prove a stronger surface interaction with
benzene molecules. Even if diffusional effects on SZ3
sample cannot be ruled out, its lower surface area
(Table 1) and the value of the desorption maximum
point to a higher strength of B-sites in these systems
with respect to K10 and CDP catalysts characterized
by the lowest T
d
values (Table 4).
The above characterization ndings allow to shed
light on the reactivity of catalysts in methanol con-
version (Table 5) taking into account that this is a
typical protonic acid-catalysed reaction [29]. In parti-
cular, focusing our attention on the F value which can
be taken as a measure of the specic activity of acid
sites of the various catalysts, it emerges that: (i) the
analogous low F values (0.50.6) of K10, CDP and
SZ3 samples mainly arise from a low concentration
and availability of protonic acid sites; (ii) although the
concentration of B-sites is much larger in HY zeolite,
diffusional restrictions limit the kinetics of the reac-
tion and therefore only a small increase in the F value
(1.3) with respect to previous systems is attained: (iii)
the CSPW salt exhibits a F value (89.1) more than two
orders of magnitude larger than those of the other
systems likely as a consequence of a ``pseudo-liquid''
behaviour enabling a ready availability and mobility
of protons at the surface which generally account for
unusual catalytic properties [8,9,30].
4.3. Reactivity of acid catalysts in benzene alkylation
The marked differences observed in the specic
activity of the studied catalysts in the liquid-phase
alkylation of benzene (Table 6) cannot be rationalized
only on the basis of the acidic properties. In fact, the
F. Arena et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 170 (1998) 127137 135
formation of the large diphenylmethane molecule
implies remarkable structure effects in HY zeolite
(molecular-shape selectivity) with the consequence
that the reaction could take place at the external
surface of the catalyst grains then resulting in lower
activity (Table 6) [10].
Temperature programmed surface reaction mea-
surements of adsorbed C
7
H
7
Cl (results not reported
here) showed the primary formation of HCl at 80
858C on all the systems and irrespective of their acidic
strength, pointing to the easy activation of ben-
zylchloride likely according to the following reaction
scheme:
C
7
H
7
Cl
(ads)
H
s
HCl
(g)
C
7
H
7
(ads)
:
This nding proves that some other step must be the
rate determining step (r.d.s.) of the heterogeneous
alkylation of benzene. In particular, taking into
account the results of benzene adsorption (Table 4)
it is evident that, with the exception of the HY zeolite
whose reactivity is mostly controlled by its structural
properties [10], stronger is the afnity for the substrate
the more reactive the catalyst is in the alkylation
reaction (Table 6). Such a statement is well supported
by the straight-line relationship between rate of ben-
zene alkylation and amount of adsorbed benzene
(Table 4), shown in Fig. 6. Since the catalytic activa-
tion of benzylchloride into the corresponding carbo-
nation (C
7
H
7
(ads)
) occurs readily on all the systems, the
above ndings likely point to the adsorption of the
substrate as r.d.s. of the liquid-phase alkylation of
benzene over heterogeneous catalysts.
5. Conclusions
The surface acid properties of different solid cata-
lysts have been systematically evaluated by tempera-
ture programmed desorption (TPD) measurements
using various probe molecules.
In particular, the main results of this study can be
summarized as follows:
v TPD of adsorbed ammonia is a reliable method to
feature the strength but not the nature (Brnsted or
Lewis) of surface acid sites in solid acid catalysts;
v mathematical analysis of NH
3
-TPD spectra high-
lights the presence of weak, medium and strong
acid sites on all the catalysts also enabling their
quantitative estimate;
v the comparative evaluation of the TPD patterns of
NH
3
, C
5
H
5
N and C
6
H
6
allows to shed light on the
nature (B or L) of the acidic sites;
v the reactivity in methanol dehydration and ben-
zene alkylation reactions is controlled by both the
acidic and structural properties of solid catalysts;
v a ``pseudo-liquid behaviour'' accounts for the
highest catalytic performance of the
H
0.5
Cs
2.5
PW
12
O
40
salt in both methanol dehydra-
tion and benzene alkylation.
.
Acknowledgements
Dr. S. Hocevar (University of Lubiana, 63100 Slo-
venia) is acknowledged for helpful discussion and
suggestions. The nancial support to this work by
SNIARICERCHE S.c.p.a., via Pomarico, Pisticci
Scalo (Matera) is also gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] K. Tanabe, in: B.L. Shapiro (Ed.), Heterogeneous Catalysis;
Catalysis by Novel Solid Strong Acids and Superacids, Texas
A&M University Press, College Station, TX, 1984.
[2] F. Figueras, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 30 (1988) 457.
[3] G.A. Olah, Friedel-Crafts Chemistry, Wiley, New York,
1973.
Fig. 6. Relationships between amount of adsorbed benzene
(Table 4) and rate of benzene alkylation (Table 6) of solid acid
catalysts.
136 F. Arena et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 170 (1998) 127137
[4] T. Cseri, S. Bekassy, F. Figureras, E. Cseke, L.-C. Menorval,
R. Dutarte, Appl. Catal. 132 (1995) 141.
[5] C. Miao, W. Hua, J. Chen, Z. Gao, Catal. Lett. 37 (1996)
187.
[6] B.H. Davis, R.A. Keogh, R. Srinivasan, Catal. Today 20
(1994) 219.
[7] A. Clearfield, G.P.D. Serrette, A.H. Khazi-Syed, Catal Today
20 (1994) 295 and references therein.
[8] T. Hibi, T. Takahashi, T. Okuhara, M. Misono, Appl. Catal. 73
(1986) 69.
[9] T. Nishimura, T.M. Okuhara, M. Misono, Appl. Catal. 73
(1991) L7 and references therein.
[10] B. Coq, V. Gourves, F. Figueras, Appl. Catal. A 100 (1993)
69.
[11] H.G. Karge, V. Dondur, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 765.
[12] H.G. Karge, V. Dondur, J. Weitkamp, J. Phys. Chem. 95
(1991) 283.
[13] M.C. Abello, A.P. Velasco, M.F. Gomez, J.B. Rivarola
Langmuir 13 (1997) 2596 and references therein.
[14] R.B. Borade, A. Clearfield, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 6729.
[15] H. Matsuhashi, H. Motoi, K. Arata, Catal. Lett. 26 (1994)
325.
[16] S.B. Sharma, B.L. Meyers, D.T. Chen, J. Miller, J.A.
Dumesic, Appl. Catal. 102 (1993) 253.
[17] N.-Y. Topse, K. Pedersen, E.G. Derouane, J. Catal. 70
(1981) 41.
[18] C.V. Hidalgo, H. Itoh, T. Hattori, M. Niwa, Y. Hurakami, J.
Catal. 85 (1984) 362.
[19] W. Reschetilowski, B. Unger, K.P. Wendlandt, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1 85 (1989) 2941.
[20] G.I. Kapustin, T.R. Brueva, A.L. Klyachko, S. Beran, B.
Wichterlova, Appl. Catal. 42 (1988) 239.
[21] K. Chao, B.-H. Chiou, C.-C. Cho, S.-Y. Jeng, Zeolites 4
(1984) 2.
[22] V.R. Choudary, K.R. Srinivasan, A.P. Singh, Zeolites 10
(1990) 16.
[23] M. Otremba, W. Zajdel, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 51 (1993)
473.
[24] M. Otremba, W. Zajdel, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 51 (1993)
481.
[25] C.-H. Liu, C.-Y. Hsu, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm. (1992)
1479.
[26] T. Barzetti, E. Selli, D. Moscotti, L. Forni, J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 92 (1996) 1401.
[27] A. Jentis, G. Warecka, J.A. Lercher, J. Mol. Catal. 51 (1989)
309.
[28] C. Morterra, G. Cerrato, C. Emanuel, V. Bolis, in: L. Guczi et
al. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Catalysis, Akademiai Kiado,
Budapest, 1993, p. 2585.
[29] S. Hocevar, J. Lever, J. Catal. 135 (1992) 518.
[30] T. Okuhara, T. Arai, T. Ichiki, K. Younge Lee, J. Mol. Catal.
55 (1989) 293.
F. Arena et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 170 (1998) 127137 137