Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Produc've Persistence
Secondary Drivers
Have accurate knowledge about succeeding in the course and navigating the institution.
Have the know-how and self-discipline to set and prioritize long and short-term goals over short-term desires and distractions
Use learning strategies that are appropriate for the academic challenge they are facing.
Have strategies for regulating anxiety.
See that math isnt just a set of algorithms to be memorized but a connected set of concepts that can be understood and applied.!
Short, intermediate and long-term goal setting incorporated directly into the course.3! Incorporate self-regulated learning into the classroom.4! Students write about their worries before an exam.5! Train students to interpret arousal as a challenge.6! Curriculum materials emphasize conceptual understanding and connections between concepts.7! Students complete growth mindset writing exercise.8,9! Faculty emphasize effort and strategies rather than luck or lack of ability as explanations for success or failure.10! ! Students hear from similar peers who struggled in math but overcame that struggle and became better at math.11,12 ! At beginning and throughout course explain to students how the course leads to degree/certicate completion. ! Faculty emphasize the importance of connecting course objectives to personal and social goals.13,14,15! ! Ask students to generate personal reasons for mastering a course objective rather than telling them a rationale.16 Have routines for noticing attendance and participation. ! Implement a course contract early in the term. Create expectations and opportunities for classroom collaboration that is productive and involves all students. 17,18! Accompany criticism or low scores with a reminder of the courses high standards and an assurance of the students potential to reach those standards.20,21! Show students that initial social difculties are common, temporary, and do not signal an inability to belong.22! Present the rationale and evidence for the importance and malleability of PP drivers.23,24! Train faculty to embed learning strategies in curriculum! Train faculty in how to reinforce that productive struggle and effort can produce deeper math understanding.!
Aim: Students continue to put forth effort during challenges and when they do so they use effective strategies.! Course dropout rate (after census) is less than 10%. At least 70% of students pass the rst term.! At least 65% of students enroll in the second term. Possible measures: Attendance Time on task Strategy use Help-seeking Revising work Challenge-seeking
Believe they can actively grow their math ability with effort, help, and good strategies. View math success as something people like them do, and not something other people do. Students see how completion of this course is relevant to goals for degree/certicate completion.!
Students believe the knowledge from the course is relevant to a personal or socially-valued goal. Students feel as though they are completing academic tasks for personal reasons. Students feel that the professor cares that they, personally, succeed in the course and in college.
Students feel they are a necessary and important part of the classroom community. Students feel comfortable asking questions Students do not feel stigmatized due to membership in a negatively stereotyped group.19! Students do not question whether they belong. Faculty believe students can succeed if they develop more productive skills and mindsets.! ! Faculty know how to promote productive skills and mindsets.! Faculty see helping their students to productively persist as part their role as an instructor.! Faculty integrate PP principles in how they talk to students and in the curriculum they assign. !
2/25/13
References
1.
Matejka,
K.,
&
Kurke,
L.
B.
(1994).
Designing
a
great
syllabus.
College
Teaching,
42,
115-117.
2.
Duckworth,
A.
L.,
Grant,
H.,
Loew,
B.,
OeMngen,
G.,
&
Gollwitzer,
P.
M.
(2011).
Self-regulaRon
strategies
improve
self-discipline
in
adolescents:
Benets
of
mental
contrasRng
and
implementaRon
intenRons.
Educa3onal
Psychology,
31,
17-26.
3.
Morisano,
D.,
Hirsh,
J.
B.,
Peterson,
J.
B.,
Shore,
B.,
&
Pihl,
R.
O.
(2010).
SeMng,
elaboraRng,
and
reecRng
on
personal
goals
improves
academic
performance.
Journal
of
Applied
Psychology,
95,
255-264.
4.
Zimmerman,
B.
J.,
Moylan,
A.,
Hudesman,
J.,
White,
N.,
&
Flugman,
B.
(2011).
Enhancing
self-reecRon
and
mathemaRcs
achievement
of
at-risk
urban
technical
college
students.
Psychological
Test
and
Assessment
Modeling,
53,
141-160.
5.
Ramirez,
G.,
&
Beilock,
S.
L.
(2011).
WriRng
About
TesRng
Worries
Boosts
Exam
Performance
in
the
Classroom.
Science,
331,
211-213.
6.
Jamieson,
J.,
Mendes,
W.
B.,
Blackstock,
E.,
&
Schmader,
T.
(2009).
Turning
the
knots
in
your
stomach
into
bows:
Reappraising
arousal
improves
performance
on
the
GRE.
Journal
of
Experimental
Social
Psychology,
46,
208-212.
7.
Hiebert,
J.,
&
Grouws,
D.
A.
(2007).
The
eects
of
classroom
mathemaRcs
teaching
on
students
learning.
In
F.
K.
Lester
(Ed.),
Second
handbook
of
research
on
mathema3cs
teaching
and
learning,
371-404.
Charlohe,
NC:
InformaRon
Age
Publishers.
8.
Blackwell,
L.,
Trzesniewski,
K.,
&
Dweck,
C.S.
(2007).
Implicit
theories
of
intelligence
predict
achievement
across
an
adolescent
transiRon:
A
longitudinal
study
and
an
intervenRon.
Child
Development,
78,
246263;
9.Aronson,
J.,
Fried,
C.
B.,
Good,
&
Good,
C.
(2002).
Reducing
the
eects
of
stereotype
threat
on
African
American
college
students
by
shaping
theories
of
intelligence.
Journal
of
Experimental
Social
Psychology,
38,
113-123.
10.
Haynes,
T.
L.,
Perry,
R.
P.,
Stupnisky,
R.
H.,
&
Daniels,
L.
M.
(2009).
A
review
of
ahribuRonal
retraining
treatments:
Fostering
engagement
and
persistence
in
vulnerable
college
students.
In
Higher
Educa3on:
Handbook
of
Theory
and
Research
(pp.
227271).
The
Netherlands:
Springer.
11.
Wilson,
T.
D.,
&
Linville,
P.
W.
(1985).
Improving
the
Performance
of
College
Freshmen
with
AhribuRonal
Techniques.*
Journal
of
Personality
and
Social
Psychology,
49,
287-293.
12.
Wilson,
T.
D.,
Damiani,
M.,
&
Shelton,
N.
(2002).
Improving
the
academic
performance
of
college
students
with
brief
ahribuRonal
intervenRons.
In
J.
Aronson
(Ed.),
Improving
academic
achievement:
Impact
of
psychological
factors
on
educa3on,
88-108.
San
Diego,
CA:
Academic
Press.
13.
Oyserman,
D.,
Bybee,
D.,
and
Terry,
K.
(2006).
Possible
selves
and
academic
outcomes:
How
and
when
possible
selves
impel
acRon.
Journal
of
Personality
and
Social
Psychology,
91,
188-204.
14.
Jang,
Hyungshim.
(2008).
SupporRng
students'
moRvaRon,
engagement,
and
learning
during
an
uninteresRng
acRvity.
Journal
of
Educa3onal
Psychology,
100,
798.
15.
Vansteenkiste,
M.,
Simons,
J.,
Lens,
W.,
Sheldon,
K.
M.,
&
Deci,
E.
L.
(2004).
MoRvaRng
learning,
performance,
and
persistence:
The
synergisRc
role
of
intrinsic
goals
and
autonomy-support.
Journal
of
Personality
and
Social
Psychology,
87,
246-260.
16.
Hulleman,
C.
S.,
&
Harackiewicz,
J.
M.
(2009).
PromoRng
interest
and
performance
in
high
school
science
classes.*
Science,
326,
1410-1412.
17.
This
emerges
from
focus
groups
and
interviews
conducted
with
developmental
math
students
who
described
feeling
invisible
and
anonymous
in
their
developmental
math
classrooms.
18.
McClenney,
K.
M.,
&
Arnsparger,
A.
(2012).
Engaging
in
learning:
What
mahers?
In
Students
Speak:
Are
We
Listening?
AusRn,
TX:
The
Center
for
Community
College
Student
Engagement
19.
Cohen,
G.
L.,
Garcia,
J.,
Purdie-Vaughns,
V.,
Apfel,
N.,
&
Brzustoski,
P.
(2009).
Recursive
processes
in
self-armaRon:
intervening
to
close
the
minority
achievement
gap.*
Science,
324,
400-403.
20.
Cohen,
G.,
Steele,
C.
M.,
&
Ross,
L.
D.
(1999).
The
mentors
dilemma:
Providing
criRcal
feedback
across
the
racial
divide.
Personality
and
Social
Psychology
Bulle3n,
25,
13021318.
21.
Yeager,
D.S.,
Purdie-Vaughns,
V.,
Garcia,
J.,
Apfel,
N.,
Brzustoski,
P.,
Master,
A.,
Hessert,
W.T.,
Williams,
M.E.
&
Cohen,
G.L.
(in
press).
Breaking
the
cycle
of
mistrust:
Wise
intervenRons
to
provide
criRcal
feedback
across
the
racial
divide.
Journal
of
Experimental
Psychology:
General.
22.
Walton,
G.
M.,
&
Cohen,
G.
L.
(2011).
A
brief
social-belonging
intervenRon
improves
academic
and
health
outcomes
among
minority
students.
Science,
331,
14471451.
23.
Rahan,
A.,
Good,
C.,
&
Dweck,
C.
S.
(2012).
Its
ok
Not
everyone
can
be
good
at
math:
Instructors
with
an
enRty
theory
comfort
(and
demoRvate
students.
Journal
of
Experimental
Social
Psychology,
48,
731-737.
24.
Beilock,
S.
L.,
Gunderson,
E.
A.,
Ramirez,
G.,
&
Levine,
S.
C.
(2010).
Female
teachers'
math
anxiety
aects
girls'
math
achievement.
Proceedings
of
the
Na3onal
Academy
of
Sciences,
USA,
107(5),
1060-1063.