314 Plaintiffs Pretrial Statement

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-DLB Document 314 Filed 04/17/2009 Page 1 of 85
1 Eugene D. Lee (SB#: 236812)

LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE LEE
2 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3100
Los Angeles, CA 90013
3 Phone: (213) 992-3299
Fax: (213) 596-0487
4 email: elee@LOEL.com
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 FRESNO DIVISION
11 DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O., Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB
12 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S PRETRIAL STATEMENT
13 v. DATE: April 20, 2009
TIME: 11:00 a.m.
14 COUNTY OF KERN; and DOES 1 through 10, CRTRM: U.S. Dist. Ct., Crtrm. 3
inclusive, 2500 Tulare St., Fresno, CA
15 TRIAL: May 12, 2009
Defendants.
16 Complaint Filed: January 6, 2007
17
18
19
20 Pursuant to the Court’s revised scheduling order of April 8, 2009 (Doc. 313), para. 4 of the
21 Standing Order in All Civil Cases Assigned to U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger, FRCP 16, and
22 Local Rule 16-281, Plaintiff hereby submit his draft pretrial statement, accompanied by transmission via
23 email to owworders@caed.uscourts.gov, by and through his counsel of record. Plaintiff had attempted to
24 meet and confer with Defendant’s counsel, however, he was unavailable due to depositions in other
25 actions until 4/17/09. On 4/17/09, the parties finally met and conferred from 11 a.m. until 3:15 pm, at
26 which time Defendant’s counsel announced by email he had a doctor’s appointment and was therefore
27 unable to continue the meet and confer process. He suggested the continuing the meet and confer
28 process at 5 pm; however, Plaintiff indicated that the Court had set a deadline of 4 pm.
USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

PLAINTIFF’S PRETRIAL STATEMENT 1
1 This is an individual action brought by Plaintiff David F. Jadwin, D.O., a whistleblowing

2 physician with disabilities, against his employer, (i) the County of Kern (“Defendant County” or “the
3 County”), owner and operator of Kern Medical Center (“KMC”), and DOES 1 through 10.
4 Plaintiff’s claims against his employer, Defendant County, allege violations of the California
5 Family Rights Act (sections 12945.1, et seq., of the Government Code) (“CFRA”) and the Family and
6 Medical Leave Act (sections 2601, et seq. of the United States Code) (“FMLA”), which prohibit
7 interference with an employee’s right to medical leave and retaliation for an employee’s exercise of the
8 right to medical leave and for opposing any practice made unlawful by the FMLA/CFRA, including
9 filing any charge or instituting a proceeding under the FMLA/CFRA; the Fair Employment and Housing
10 Act [subdivisions (a), (h), (m) & (n) of section 12940 of the Government Code] (“FEHA”) which
11 prohibits discrimination against an employee with a disability, retaliation for opposing employment
12 practices prohibited by the FEHA, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, and failure to engage
13 in an interactive process; and of Plaintiff’s 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution right to
14 procedural due process pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Due Process”).
15 I. JURISDICTION - VENUE
16 This Court has federal question jurisdiction over the FMLA and Due Process claims pursuant to
17 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s transactionally-related state
18 claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
19 Venue is proper in Fresno in the Eastern District of California under 28 U.S.C. 1392, as a
20 substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to this claim occurred in the County of Kern,
21 California.
22 If jurisdiction is present, the parties agree that the substantive law of the State of California
23 provides the rule of decision for supplemental claims.
24 There is no dispute concerning jurisdiction and venue.
25 II. JURY - NON-JURY
26 Plaintiff invokes his right to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
27 and pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as to all issues and claims triable as
28 of right by a jury.

1 Defendants concede Plaintiff’s such right to a jury trial.

2 III. UNDISPUTED FACTS
3 A. PRELIMINARY
4 1. At all material times, Defendant Kern County was a local public entity within the
5 meaning of sections 811.2 and 900.4 of the Government Code and is operating in Kern County,
6 California.
7 2. During the entire course of Plaintiff’s employment, Defendant Kern County has
8 continuously been an employer within the meaning of FMLA [29 C.F.R. § 825.105(C)], CFRA [Gov’t
9 Code § 12945.2(b)(2)] and FEHA (Gov’t Code § 12926(d)] engaged in interstate commerce, and
10 regularly employing more than fifty employees within seventy-five miles of Plaintiff’s workplace.
11 3. Plaintiff exhausted all adequate administrative remedies for all of his claims.
12 4. At all times from 10/17/05 to 10/4/07, DEFENDANT acted or omitted to act through its
13 officers and agents.
14 B. CAST OF CHARACTERS
15 5. Defendant Kern County is the owner and operator of Kern Medical Center (“KMC”).
16 6. KMC is an acute care teaching hospital located in Bakersfield, CA.
17 7. The Joint Conference Committee (“JCC”) is the highest decision-making body at KMC,
18 comprised of two members of the Board of Supervisors of Kern County, the Chief Executive Officer,
19 the President of the Medical Staff, the Immediate Past President of the Medical Staff, the President-elect
20 of the Medical Staff, the Chief Medical Officer, the Nurse Executive, etc.
21 8. Jennifer Abraham, M.D., was Immediate Past President of KMC Medical Staff from
22 7/1/04 to 7/1/06.
23 9. Bernard Barmann was County Counsel for Defendant Kern County from 1986 to March,
24 2009.
25 10. Karen Barnes is Chief Deputy County Counsel for Defendant Kern County.
26 11. Peter Bryan was Chief Executive Officer of KMC, and a voting member of the Joint
27 Conference Committee at KMC, from 1995 to 9/15/06.
28 12. Sandra Chester was the Director of Human Resources of KMC from 12/05 to 8/06.

1 13. David Culberson was the Interim Chief Executive Officer from 8/25/06 to 5/15/07.
2 14. Philip Dutt, M.D., was Acting Chair of Pathology at KMC from 7/14/06 to 1/09, and is
3 currently a staff pathologist at KMC.
4 15. Irwin Harris, M.D., was Chief Medical Officer of KMC, and a non-voting member of the
5 Joint Conference Committee at KMC, from 2005 to 9/1/07.
6 16. Royce Johnson, M.D., was Chair of Medicine at KMC from 1999 to the present.
7 17. Eugene Kercher, M.D., was President-elect of the KMC Medical Staff from 7/1/02 to
8 7/1/04, President of the KMC Medical Staff from 7/1/04-7/1/06, Immediate Past President of the
9 Medical Staff from 7/1/06 to 7/1/08, is currently the Chief Medical Officer of KMC, and has been a
10 voting member of the JCC since 2002. He has also been Acting Chair of Pathology of KMC from 1/09
11 to present.
12 18. Marvin Kolb, M.D., was Chief Medical Officer of KMC from 1999 to 8/3/04.
13 19. Chester Lau, M.D., is a former radiologist of KMC.
14 20. Joseph Mansour, M.D., is a gynecologist at KMC, a core physician, and a member of the
15 medical staff.
16 21. Maureen Martin, M.D., is Chair of Surgery at KMC.
17 22. Gilbert Martinez was the manager of laboratory services at KMC from 1981 to 6/13/08.
18 23. Albert McBride, M.D., is a urologist at KMC and was the Cancer Committee Liaison
19 until January 2008.
20 24. Javad Naderi, M.D., is Chair of Radiology at KMC.
21 25. Mark Nations is Chief Deputy County Counsel for Defendant Kern County.
22 26. Steven O’Connor was Interim Director of Human Resources of KMC from June 2006 to
23 June 2007 and Director of Human Resources of KMC from June 2007 to the present.
24 27. Barbara Patrick was a member of the Board of Supervisors of Kern County from 1994 to
25 2007 and Chair in 1996, 2001 and 2006.
26 28. Jose Perez, M.D., was a voting member of the JCC from XX to XX.
27 29. Leonard Perez, M.D., was Chair of OB/GYN at KMC from XX to XX.
28 30. Scott Ragland, D.O., was President-Elect of the KMC Medical Staff from 7/1/04 to

1 7/1/06 and President of the KMC Medical Staff from 7/1/06 to 7/1/08, and a voting member of the JCC
2 from 2004 to 2008.
3 31. William Roy, M.D., was Chief of the division of Gynecologic Oncology at KMC from
4 early 2005 to early 2007.
5 32. Savita Shertudke, M.D., was a pathologist at KMC from 11/1/05 to early 2009.
6 33. Toni Smith is Chief Nurse Executive of KMC, and a voting member of the JCC.
7 34. William Taylor, M.D., was a surgeon, core physician and member of the medical staff at
8 KMC until 12/6/08.
9 35. Raymond Watson was a member of the Board of Supervisors of Kern County from 2002
10 to the present and Chair in 2006.
11 36. Gian Yakhoub, M.D., is currently Chief Pathologist at KMC.
12 37. Tai Yoo, M.D., is Chair of Psychiatry at KMC.
13 38. Plaintiff is a pathologist whom Defendant County hired as a pathologist at KMC and
14 appointed to the position of Chair of the Pathology Department.
15 39. Plaintiff was continuously employed by Defendant Kern County from October 24, 2000
16 to October 4, 2007.
17 C. PLAINTIFF’S EMPLOYMENT
18 40. Pursuant to his employment contract, Plaintiff was a “core physician.”
19 41. On October 24, 2000, Plaintiff signed an employment contract with the County. The term
20 of Plaintiff’s employment was set to expire on November 30, 2006. According to Exhibit A, Plaintiff, in
21 his role as Pathology Chairman, was expected to serve as the medical director for the anatomic
22 pathology service and clinical laboratories at KMC, and report to the KMC Medical Director.
23 42. Defendant Kern County placed Plaintiff’s initial salary level at Step C.
24 43. On October 5, 2002, Plaintiff executed a second employment contract which called for a
25 term ending October 4, 2007. The contract provided that, as a Core Physician, Plaintiff must perform
26 certain services as set forth in Exhibit A.
27 44. Plaintiff had a term employment contract giving him a right to be employed as a core
28 physician for five years (from October 5, 2002 to October 4, 2007).

1 45. Plaintiff requested and received leaves of absence and reduced work schedules, the terms
2 and conditions of and reasons for which are memorialized in writings that speak for themselves.
3 D. CHRONOLOGY
4 46. Plaintiff’s former attorney sent a letter to Kern County Counsel Bernard Barmann and
5 Mr. Barmann met with Plaintiff on or about February 9, 2006.
6 47. Defendant Bryan and Plaintiff exchanged written communications regarding Plaintiff’s
7 reduced work schedule and requests for leaves of absence. Plaintiff met with Defendant Bryan and
8 others to discuss those subjects.
9 48. Defendant Bryan and Plaintiff exchanged written correspondence regarding Plaintiff’s
10 tenure and performance as Chair of the Pathology Department at KMC. All the writings speak for
11 themselves.
12 49. On October 12, 2005, Plaintiff presented at an intra-hospital conference called the
13 “Tumor Board.” Plaintiff’s presentation dealt with the medical appropriateness of a proposed radical
14 hysterectomy for a KMC patient. Plaintiff believed the proposed hysterectomy was based on inaccurate
15 pathology reports from outside reviewers and Plaintiff suggested that internal review of such outside
16 work be conducted.
17 50. Following the conference, three physicians who were in attendance – Drs. Albert
18 McBride, William Roy, and Bill Taylor – submitted three letters of dissatisfaction to Dr. Irwin Harris,
19 Chief Medical Officer, who was also in attendance.
20 51. In a letter dated October 17, 2005, Plaintiff was informed that his “repeated misconduct
21 at the Tumor Conference on October 12, 2005 was noted by numerous attendants, three of which have
22 written letters of their dissatisfaction, which will be entered into your medical staff file. You exceeded
23 your time reasonably allotted for the presentation of pathologic findings, you ignored the requests of the
24 leader of the conference to be brief, and you became so detailed in trying to make your political point,
25 that you lost the audience and failed to meet the teaching objective of the conference for the benefit of
26 the residents.” (Doc. 266 at 129.) Plaintiff did not believe that the criticism was justified.
27 52. A few months later, Plaintiff took a leave of absence in the form of a reduced work
28 schedule. (Doc. 278 at 23). In a letter to Bryan dated January 9, 2006, Plaintiff requested a leave of

1 absence in light of “depression” he had developed as a result of alleged professional mistreatment and
2 harassment. The letter is actually incorrectly dated January 9, “2005.” According to Plaintiff, it is
3 supposed to be dated January 9, “2006.” (Pl. Dep. Vol. II. 496:9-20.) No party disputes this fact.
4 During the past five years I have performed impeccable service for KMC each and every
day. Virtually every interaction I have had with hundreds of KMC associates has been
5 professional, respectful and courteous. I have always performed or tried to perform my
duties in a virtuous and ethical manner. I have received high performance ratings from
6 staff and residents on departmental evaluations.
7 Over the past several years I have been the victim of professional mistreatment by a few
members of the medical staff. You are aware of these instances, as they have been
8 discussed during multiple hospital leadership meetings and during our one-to-one
meetings. I do not consider these to be directly as a result of communication failures on
9 my part, but rather inappropriate harassment by a small group [of] individuals. I believe
this harassment is in response to the many quality management issues that I have raised.
10
This harassment has led me [sic] develop depression and insomnia that has impacted my
11 health and work. Although I enjoy much of my work at KMC, it is not possible for me to
continue to work under this form of harassment. These issues largely have gone
12 unresolved for years in spite of multiple requests from me for action. The most recent
issue involving the October Oncology Conference is to date still unresolved.
13
This form of harassment is unacceptable and must be resolved quickly. I therefore
14 request administrative leave with pay until this issue is resolved. It is my wish to resolve
this issue immediately, and I request that you correct this hostile environment
15 immediately.
16 (Doc. 266 at 133.)
17 53. It is undisputed that, on January 9, 2006, Plaintiff asked Bryan to allow Plaintiff to work
18 part-time and at home while Plaintiff was recovering from his disabling depression. (Doc. 278 at 28.)
19 54. On January 13, 2006, Plaintiff’s psychiatrist, Paul Riskin, completed a form entitled
20 “Certification of Health Care Provider Medical Leave of Absence.” The form states that Plaintiff’s
21 medical condition or need for treatment commenced on “12-16-05” and the “probabl[e] duration of
22 medical condition or need for treatment” is “2-3 mo.” Plaintiff’s probable return date was listed as “3-
23 16-06.” (Doc. 270 at 4.) On the form, Riskin identified his practice as “psychiatry” and certified that
24 Plaintiff had a serious health condition. (Id.) He wrote that “it is my hope that 1-2 work days should be a
25 reasonable schedule for a period of 2-3 months” and “Patient should work 1-2 days per week.” (Id.)
26 From the facts, it remains unclear whether the County actually received this form on January 13, 2006.
27 55. On or about March 2, 2006, Plaintiff submitted a “Kern County Personnel Department
28 Request For Leave Of Absence” form on which Plaintiff checked the box “Initial Request.” (Doc. 270 at

1 6.) He requested a leave of absence from “12-16-05” to “3-15-06.” (Id.) Under the section entitled
2 “Mandatory Leave FMLA/CFRA” Plaintiff requested “Intermittent-Employee” leave. (Id.) He indicated
3 that he had a physician’s note.
4 56. In a letter entitled “DESIGNATION OF LEAVE (Serious Health Condition of
5 Employee-Intermittent),” dated March 2, 2006, Sandra Chester from Human Resources (“HR”)
6 informed Plaintiff that HR had been notified of his request for leave and, as HR understood it, Plaintiff
7 intended for his leave to commence on December 16, 2005, and end on March 15, 2006. (Doc. 259-6 at
8 6.) The letter also stated that “[b]ased on the information available to us, it appears that you are eligible
9 for a leave under FMLA/CFRA. Unless we provide you with information that your leave has not been
10 approved or that we are withdrawing our FMLA/CFRA designation, the requested leave will count
11 against your FMLA/CFRA entitlement.” (Id.) On March 13, 2006, Plaintiff’s request for leave was
12 approved, i.e., Plaintiff’s Request For Leave Of Absence form was marked as “approved” and signed.
13 (Doc. 259-6 at 5.) It is undisputed that Plaintiff took a reduced schedule CFRA medical leave from
14 December 16, 2005, to March 15, 2006. (Doc. 278 at 23.)
15 57. On the day he was due back, March 16, 2006, Plaintiff wrote an e-mail to Bryan with the
16 subject line “Leave of Absence.” (Doc. 265 at 39.) In his e-mail, Plaintiff stated he would be taking a
17 few more months of leave:
18 I will be taking you (sic) suggestion and take 2 to 3 more months of leave. I am
scheduled to have surgery on March 22, 2006 with a several week recovery time. I hope
19 that appropriate LT coverage has been scheduled to assist Phil and Savita with the
service work. It is quite demanding and they both appeared to be overworked when I last
20 saw them. (Id.)
21 58. In a letter dated April 20, 2006, Chester informed Plaintiff that his “Intermittent Leave of
22 Absence expired on March 15, 2006. . . . [T]o extend your leave, you . . . need to complete the enclosed
23 Request for Leave of Absence form and return it to the Human Resources Office, no later than Tuesday
24 April 25, 2006.” (Doc. 259-6 at 10.)
25 59. In response, Plaintiff submitted a Request For Leave Of Absence form dated April 26,
26 2006. (Doc. 259-6 at 11.) Plaintiff checked the box for “Extension Request” and requested a leave of
27 absence extension from “3/15/06” to “9-15-06” with a return date of “9-16-06.” (Id.) Plaintiff indicated
28 he was requesting FMLA/CFRA leave for “non-Job Related/Illness or Disability” and had an

1 accompanying physician’s note. (Id.)

2 60. Plaintiff’s accompanying physician’s note, another “Certification of Health Care Provider
3 Medical Leave of Absence” form completed by Riskin, is dated April 26, 2006. (Doc. 259-6.) Riskin
4 wrote that, “[t]his employee is unable to work full time and requires part-time or less to avoid worsening
5 of his serious medical condition.” (Id.) Riskin estimated that Plaintiff would need “weekly doctor’s
6 visits” and “treatment for 6 mo. to one year.” (Id.)
7 61. On April 28, 2006, Plaintiff had a meeting with Bryan, Karen Barnes (County Counsel)
8 and Steve O’Conner from HR about Plaintiff’s leave of absence. Bryan composed an Officer
9 Memorandum (dated April 28, 2006) purportedly summarizing the meeting. In the memorandum, Brian
10 states:
11 I provided you [Plaintiff] with the summary of your medical leave history (see attached).
This packet contained the calculations and policies related to how the County of Kern
12 handles medical leaves. In essence, you have 137 hours available to be taken before you
hit the 480-hour limitation. Medical Leaves also run for a maximum of six months so
13 this criterion sets June 16, 2006 as the last day available to you under this status. You
said that you did not have any questions and I referred you to Human Resources, Steve
14 O’Conner, should you have any questions about how to interpret the leave provisions.
15 You also mentioned that you were scheduled to work on Monday May 1, 2006 and
asked if I wanted you to be present. You also indicated that from that day, you would be
16 out until further notice. I left the option of working on Monday to you and asked that
you coordinate with Dr. Dutt about coverage. I also mentioned that after Monday it
17 would be preferable for you not to have an intermittent work schedule and it would be
easier on the department to just have you on leave until your status is resolved.
18
Finally, I said that by June 16, 2006 you needed to give me your decision about your
19 employment status. Your options were to either return full time or resign your position.
As chairman, your department and the hospital needs you here full time. You indicated
20 that you understood the deadline.
21 (Doc. 259-6 at 15.)
22 62. While on full-time leave, in a letter dated May 31, 2006, Plaintiff wrote to Bryan to
23 request an extension of time to make a decision regarding his continued employment:
24 As you know, you have requested that I give you my decision by June 16 as to whether I
will be continuing on in or resigning from my position at the hospital. Unfortunately, I
25 underwent sinus surgery in early May which took some time to recover from. Then last
Monday, I suffered a serious fall that fractured my foot and avulsed a ligament from my
26 ankle.
27 I would greatly appreciate an extension on the June 16 deadline as my personal
circumstances of late simply have not permitted me to consider and render such an
28 important decision.

(Doc. 259-7 at 2.)

1
63. In response, Bryan e-mailed Plaintiff on June 13, 2006, and sent a hard copy letter on
2
June 14, 2006. The letter reads as follows:
3
I was sorry to hear of your accident. It seems as though it has been one thing after
4 another for you and I can imagine your growing frustration with not being healthy.
5 My response to your request for an extension of leave has two parts to it. First, I will
grant you a Personal Necessity Leave of up to 90 days. This is predicated on your
6 providing a physician’s note indicating the ailment. This is common practice with the
County and I want to make sure that we are consistent in following policy.
7
This extension of leave, however, applies only to your employment status. It does not
8 apply to your appointment as chairman and the associated duty assignments, which
brings me to the second part of this extension. You have essentially been out either full-
9 or part-time for the past eight or nine months. You have used all of your vacation and
sick time in addition to being in a non-pay status for six months, and while I understand
10 the circumstances, it does not diminish the fact that the Department of Pathology needs a
full-time chairman. For this reason, I am going to enact the provisions of the Medical
11 Staff Bylaws, Paragraph 9.6-4, REMOVAL, and rescind your appointment as chairman.
I regret that I have to do this but KMC is going through some challenging times and we
12 need a full complement of leaders. Your continued unavailability creates a void that
must be filled. This decision is effective June 17, 2006.
13
The obvious question that I am sure comes to mind is, ‘what does this mean for me?’
14 This essentially means that should you decide to return to work at KMC either within
this 90-day period or at the end of it, your contract will be changed to reflect a regular
15 staff pathologist duty assignment. The amount of time you spend will be mutually
agreeable, but your duties will not include those of the chairman.
16
(Doc. 259-7 at 3.)
17
64. In a memorandum he drafted to the JCC dated July 10, 2006, Bryan requested that the
18
Committee endorse his recommendation to rescind Plaintiff’s appointment as Chairman of the Pathology
19
Department. (Doc. 259-3 at 22.)
20
65. Bryan’s recommendation letter, dated July 10, 2006, to the JCC began as follows:
21
Under the provisions of paragraph 9.7-4 of the Medical Staff Bylaws (enclosure 1) I
22 recommend that Dr. David Jadwin be removed as Chairman, Department of Pathology.
This recommendation is based on Dr. Jadwin’s unavailability for service because of
23 extended medical leaves for non-work related ailments.
24 (Doc. 266-2 at 31.)
25 66. Bryan then gave a chronology of events, including Plaintiff’s absences from work while
26 he was on FMLA leave from December 15, 2006 to March 16, 2006, and Plaintiff’s full-time FMLA
27 leave starting in May 2006. In the last event in his chronology, Bryan stated:
28 Since the middle of November 2005 Dr. Jadwin has worked only 32% of the hours
normally expected of a full time pathologist (enclosure 9). Since my notice of June 14,
2006 Dr. Jadwin has made no attempt to contact me concerning my decision to relieve
1 him of his chairman duties nor has he indicated any desire to negotiate a new contract.
2 (Id at 32.)
3 In closing, Bryan wrote:
4 This recommendation to rescind Dr. Jadwin’s appointment as Chairman, Department of
Pathology is based solely on his continued non-availability to provide the leadership
5 necessary for a contributing member of the medical staff leadership group. KMC must
have its key personnel available, and Dr. Jadwin has provided no indication that he is
6 committed to return to work or resume his duties as chairman. Other than his latest
written communication requesting an extension of medical leave, Dr. Jadwin has made
7 no attempt in the last two months to contact me concerning his employment status or
how the Department of Pathology should be managed during his extended absence.
8
I therefore request that the Joint Conference Committee act pursuant to paragraph 9.7-4
9 of the Medical Staff Bylaws and, by majority vote, endorse my recommendation to
rescind Dr. Jadwin’s appointment as Chairman, Department of Pathology.
10
(Id.)
11
67. The Committee endorsed Bryan’s recommendation by a majority vote and Plaintiff lost
12
his chairmanship on July 10, 2006. (Doc. 266-2 at 29.) This vote came after Plaintiff had taken a
13
medical leave of absence.
14
68. Plaintiff was removed from his position as Chair of the Pathology Department in part
15
because he was neither working full-time nor present in the hospital.
16
69. The removal necessitated a reduction in Plaintiff’s base compensation. On September 15,
17
2006, the County’s counsel and Plaintiff’s attorney communicated regarding the amendment to
18
Plaintiff’s employment contract. In an e-mail dated September 15, 2006, from Barnes (the County’s
19
counsel) to Eugene Lee (Plaintiff’s counsel), Barnes attached a copy of the proposed amendment and
20
stated: “As I mentioned, the amendment, which must be approved by the Kern County Board of
21
Supervisors before Jadwin can begin to work, reflects changes to the base salary and the job duties
22
consistent with Dr. Jadwin’s change in status from department chair to staff pathologist.” (Doc. 267 at
23
19.)
24
70. Defendant County subsequently amended Plaintiff’s employment agreement to reduce
25
Plaintiff’s base compensation and revise his job duties. (Doc. 259-11 at 10-11.). The end date of his
26
employment term (October 4, 2007) remained unaltered.
27
71. Defendant County appointed Dr. Philip Dutt Acting Chair of the Pathology Department.
28
72. Plaintiff returned to work as a staff pathologist at KMC on October 4, 2006.
1 73. Plaintiff exchanged written correspondence with KMC Interim CEO David Culberson
2 and those writings speak for themselves.
3 74. Plaintiff, for the first time, reported various concerns he was having to outside authorities,
4 including the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (“JCAHO”), the College
5 of American Pathologists (“CAP”), and the California Department of Health Services (“DHS”). (Doc.
6 272-2 at 5.) These outside reports dealt with a host of issues including “[l]ost and incomplete product
7 chart copies related to blood transfusion” and “[s]torage of calvarium bone flaps for reimplantation in
8 unsafe storage and without state tissue bank license.” (See, e.g., Doc. 260-2 at 22.)
9 75. Defendant Kern County placed Plaintiff on involuntary administrative leave from
10 October 7, 2006 to October 4, 2007 pending resolution of a personnel matter. David Culberson, the
11 Interim CEO, sent a hand delivered letter to Plaintiff informing Plaintiff that he was being placed on
12 paid administrative leave effective immediately. (Doc. 259-10 at 39.).
13 76. In a letter to David Culberson dated December 13, 2006, Plaintiff informed hospital
14 administration that he had notified outside authorities of alleged violations. (Doc. 265 at 79; Doc. 278 at
15 6.)
16 77. Plaintiff remained on administrative leave until his contract expired on October 4, 2007.
17 78. It is undisputed that, to this day, Plaintiff has not personally received an explanation from
18 Defendants as to why he was placed on administrative leave or why his contract was not renewed
19 despite repeated requests for an explanation. (Doc. 278 at 7.)
20 79. The County actually admitted in its response to Plaintiff’s statement of undisputed
21 material facts that a decision was made not to renew Plaintiff’s contract. (Doc. 278 at 7.)
22 80. Defendant County has provided Plaintiff with the information he requested from the
23 computer that had been previously assigned to him.
24 81. Plaintiff filed a claim with Defendant Kern County and the claim was rejected.
25 82. Before his contract term expired, on January 6, 2007, Plaintiff filed his first Complaint in
26 this action. (Doc. 2.)
27 83. Philip Dutt was placed on administrative leave in 2008.
28 84. Savita Shertudke was placed on administrative leave in 2008.

E. PCC
1
85. In a letter dated January 9, 2006, Plaintiff stated:
2
All transfusion product chart copies must be directed to the blood bank for assessment
3 immediately following transfusion. The problems with incomplete product chart copies
have been discussed multiple times with nursing and yourself. As medical director of the
4 blood bank, I have an obligation to ensure that KMC is in compliance with state &
federal regulations and AABB accreditation standards. It is my opinion as blood bank
5 director that until nursing can otherwise assure than all product chart copies are properly
completed, the blood bank must perform immediate monitoring of all product chart
6 copies to ensure completion or corrective action.5
7 86. (Id.) A few months later, Plaintiff sent Bryan an e-mail on April 17, 2006, with the
8 subject line “Compliance with Regulations.” This e-mail discussed deficiencies in the PCCs:
9 Peter:
10 I have completed an analysis of the 57 memos sent to nursing over the past several
months detailing deficiencies in product chart copies (PCCs). I have not received an
11 administrative response to the memos. These memos detail 34 instances of missing
verification signatures, either one or both, required by regulations and standards.
12
Six PCCs were not located in the chart, a noticeable improvement over past
13 performance.
14 One hundred fifty nine (159) PCCs had one or more other lesser, but still important
deficiencies.
15
Two transfusions were not reported on the PCCs or to the blood bank.
16
The five charts reviewed without deficiency by the JCAHO that you cited on April 13th
17 during our meeting is obviously too small a sample.
18 I am extremely concerned about the lack of administrative communication, attention and
significant improvement in this area. This is a compliance issue that involves Federal
19 regulations, California regulations and accreditation standards for the JCAHO, CAP and
AABB. As the Medical Director of the Blood Bank I must advise you again that these
20 deficiencies must be corrected immediately to meet 100 percent compliance, especially
for verification signatures and lost PCCs. I have proposed several different strategies
21 over the past several years for achieving almost immediate results, but I am unaware that
any corrective action has been put into place.
22
You and I have an ethical and regulatory duty to correct this situation in a timely
23 manner. After multiple requests for action, I cannot conscientiously sit back any longer.
24 I therefore request a meeting with yourself, Mr. Barmann, Dr. Kercher, Dr. Harris and
me to discuss a resolution for this dilemma and thereby reduce serious liability for Kern
25 County and KMC.
26 (Doc. 265 at 90.)
27 87. As a threshold matter, Plaintiff asserts and Defendants acknowledge that the County
28 employed Plaintiff, and the County is a “government agency” under Labor Code § 1102.5.

1 88. Section 1602.5 of the Health & Safety Code provides in pertinent part as follows:
2 (a) No person shall engage in the production of human whole blood or human whole
blood derivatives unless the person is licensed under this chapter and the human whole
3 blood or human whole blood derivative is collected, prepared, labeled, and stored in
accordance with both of the following:
4
(1) The standards set forth in the 13th Edition of ‘Standards for Blood Banks and
5 Transfusion Services,’ as published by the American Association of Blood Banks and in
effect on November 15, 1989, or any amendments thereto or later published editions or
6 amendments thereto. These shall be the standards for all licensed blood banks and blood
transfusion services in the state.
7
(2) Those provisions of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations that are continued
8 in effect by subdivision (c) or that are adopted pursuant to subdivision (b).
9 89. Plaintiff provides an e-mail, dated May 20, 2005, which he sent to Toni Smith, Chief
10 Nurse Executive at KMC. In this e-mail, Plaintiff recounts a conversation he had with “Holly Rapp,
11 AABB Accreditation Director.” (Doc. 265 at 121.) The e-mail (which contains some connected words)
12 states:
13 Telephone Conversation: Holly Rapp, AABB Accreditation Director [telephone
number].
14
• California accepts compliance with AABB accreditation standards as fulfilment
15 of California State Regulations regarding blood component therapy
16 • AABB Standards, 23rd Edition (2004) state: The patient’s medical record shall
include: transfusion order, the name of the component, the donor unit or pool
17 identificationnumber, the date and time of transfusion, pre-and post-transfusion vital
signs, theamount transfused, the identification of the transfusionist, and if applicable,
18 transfusion adverse events.
19 • The standards do not define what constitutes the ‘patient’s medical record’.
20 • She stated that the medical record may be construed as records other than
thepatient’s chart.
21
• When I explained the proposal to store the PCC records in the transfusion
22 department, she said that this would be acceptable. In her experience, it is customary for
the bloodbank to at least receive a copy of the PCC.
23
• When I explained the problems with misplaced and incomplete documents, she
24 said thatthis must be corrected immediately. If this requires sending all PCCs to the
blood bank inthe interim to gain control of the situation, then this should be done.
25
(Id.)
26
90. Defendants do not dispute that Plaintiff had this conversation with Rapp or that Plaintiff’s
27
e-mail accurately documents the conversation. Defendants include this same e-mail in their separate
28
statement of undisputed material facts. Defendants do not specifically challenge Plaintiff’s argument
1 that he had a reasonable belief that incomplete PCCs were unlawful.

2 91. Based on his unchallenged conversation with the AABB Accreditation Director, Plaintiff
3 arguably had a reasonable belief that incomplete PCCs violated the AABB standards, which in turn
4 violated Health & Safety Code § 1602.5(a)(1). That Plaintiff suggested a course of action to remedy the
5 situation, or that Plaintiff was motivated by a desire to monitor the PCCs himself in the Pathology
6 Department, does not negate his reasonable belief.
7 F. FMLA/CFRA
8 92. To establish a FMLA interference claim, Plaintiff must show: (1) he is an eligible
9 employee; (2) his employer is an employer under the FMLA; (3) he was entitled to take the FMLA leave
10 at issue; (4) he gave adequate notice of his intention to take the leave; and (5) the defendant denied him,
11 or actually discouraged him from taking, such leave. See Price v. Multnomah County, 132 F. Supp. 2d
12 1290, 1297 (D. Or. 2007); see also Hurley v. Pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., 2006 WL 708656, No. C
13 05-05028 JSW, at *3. (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2006). “A violation of the FMLA simply requires that the
14 employer deny the employee’s entitlement to FMLA leave.” Liu, 347 F.3d at 1135. Elements (1)-(4) are
15 indisputable. After Plaintiff submitted his FMLA documentation for an extension on his leave (April 26,
16 2006), Plaintiff had his meeting with Bryan and others (April 28, 2006) and was then given full-time
17 FMLA leave starting in May 2006.
18 93. In Faust v. California Portland Cement Co., the court explained:
19 Dudley v. Department of Transportation (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 255, 261,
addresses the elements of a cause of action for retaliation in violation of the
20 CFRA. Dudley, which was guided by the federal law counterpart, sets forth the
elements as follows: (1) the defendant was an employer covered by CFRA; (2)
21 the plaintiff was an employee eligible to take CFRA leave; (3) the plaintiff
exercised her right to take leave for a qualifying CFRA purpose; and (4) the
22 plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, such as termination, fine, or
suspension, because of her exercise of her right to CFRA leave. Once an
23 employee establishes a prima facie case, the employer is required to offer a
legitimate, nonretaliatory reason for the adverse employment action. If the
24 employer produces a legitimate reason for the adverse employment action, the
presumption of retaliation drops out of the picture, and the burden shifts back to
25 the employee to prove intentional retaliation.
26 150 Cal. App. 4th 864, 885 (2007) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
27 With respect to the first three elements of CFRA retaliation, Defendants admit that Plaintiff took a
28 CFRA leave from December 16, 2005 to March 15, 2006. (Doc. 278 at 23.) Defendants also concede

1 that Plaintiff took additional CFRA leave because Defendants acknowledge that Plaintiff exhausted his
2 CFRA leave by June 2006.
3 94. As of 12/16/05, Plaintiff was eligible for medical leave under FMLA/CFRA.
4 95. No party seriously disputes that Plaintiff had a “serious health condition” under the
5 FMLA – depression.
6 96. There is no dispute that the County is an employer subject to the FMLA/CFRA.
7 97. There is no dispute that Plaintiff took FMLA/CFRA medical leave.
8 98. The County explicitly, in writing, approved Plaintiff’s first “FMLA” leave request. (Doc.
9 266-2 at 65.)
10 99. After Plaintiff had taken approved FMLA leave, on April 28, 2006, in a meeting between
11 Plaintiff, Bryan, Steve O’Connor from HR, and Karen Barnes (the County’s counsel), Bryan provided
12 Plaintiff with a summary of Plaintiff’s medical leave history. This history specifically stated that
13 Plaintiff’s “Intermittent LOA began 12/16/05” and the he was “entitled to 480 hrs (FMLA intermittent
14 leave rule).” (Doc. 266 at 64) (emphasis added.) This medical leave history ended with a calculation of
15 how many hours (of the 480) Plaintiff had left after considering his usage during pay periods spanning
16 from December 2005 to March 2006, i.e., pay period “05-25,” which covers 12/10/05 to 12/23/05, to
17 pay period “06-07,” which covers 04/01/06 to 04/14/06. (Id.; see also Lee Decl., Ex. 18 at 0001527.)
18 100. Plaintiff was specifically informed that, based on his medical history, he had “137 hours
19 available to be taken before [he] hit the 480-hour limitation.” (Doc. 266-2 at 62.).
20 101. As Bryan recounted in his recommendation letter to the JCC, “Dr. Jadwin was informed .
21 . . that, at his rate of use, he had only 137 hours of medical leave left available which would take him
22 through June 16, 2006.” (Doc. 266 at 32.)
23 102. In response to Plaintiff’s separate statement of undisputed material facts, Defendants
24 “admit” that “Plaintiff requested and took reduced work schedule CFRA medical leave from December
25 16, 2005 to at least March 15, 2006.” (Doc. 278 at 23.)
26 103. Thus, without question, Plaintiff’s “FMLA” leave of absence between December 2005
27 and March 2006 was not only explicitly approved in writing, it was also counted against his FMLA
28 allotment.

1 104. Plaintiff took a second FMLA leave of absence after he submitted a second Request For
2 Leave Of Absence form on April 26, 2006. In his second request (April 26, 2006), Plaintiff asked that
3 his initial leave be extended. Then, after his meeting with Bryan and others on April 28, 2006, he was
4 granted full-time FMLA leave until June 16, 2006.
5 105. Plaintiff was on FMLA leave at minimum through the “06-09” pay period, which
6 spanned from April 29, 2006 through May 12, 2006. (See Lee Decl., Ex. 18 at 0001527.)
7 106. It is indisputable that Plaintiff had not exhausted his FMLA leave allotment by the end of
8 his first leave of absence on March 15, 2006. Plaintiff subsequently went on a second full-time FMLA
9 leave.
10 107. Plaintiff took full-time leave until June 16, 2006, the date on which Plaintiff would have
11 apparently exhausted all potential sources of leave entitlement (Doc. 266-2 at 5.). On that date, Plaintiff
12 had to give the County an answer as to whether he would return to work full-time or not. (Id.).
13 G. RETALIATION
14 108. On 6/29/06, Plaintiff’s counsel sent a letter to Defendant’s Deputy County Counsel,
15 Karen Barnes, stating: “Dr. Jadwin is seeking to prosecute various employment-, tort- and contract-
16 related claims arising out of, among other things [FEHA and CFRA]”.
17 109. On 8/3/06, Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment &
18 Housing, disclosing alleged violations by Defendant of the FEHA and CFRA.
19 110. On 1/7/07, Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against Defendants before his employment
20 contract with the County expired. His original complaint in this action alleged a cause of action under §
21 2615 of the FMLA. This conduct constituted protected activity under § 2615(b)(1).
22 111. The non-renewal of Plaintiff’s contract can qualify as an adverse employment action.
23 H. DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
24 112. Defendants do not seriously dispute that Plaintiff had depression, a mental condition,
25 while working for the County. In his letter to Bryan dated January 9, 2006, Plaintiff noted that he was
26 suffering from “depression and insomnia.” (Doc. 266 at 133.) Plaintiff’s assertion that he was suffering
27 from depression is corroborated by the forms that Plaintiff’s doctor, Dr. Riskin, filled out to qualify
28 Plaintiff for medical leaves. On these forms, Dr. Riskin identified his practice as “psychiatry” and

1 indicated that Plaintiff needed treatment and reoccurring doctor’s visits for his condition. (Doc. 270 at 4-
2 6.) Plaintiff’s assertion that he was suffering from depression is also corroborated by Dr. Reading,
3 Plaintiff’s forensic psychologist, who diagnosed Plaintiff as having a major depressive disorder:
4 Dr. Jadwin developed an Axis I disorder during the course of working at Kern,
consisting of a major depressive disorder. This was treated with both psychotherapy and
5 psychotropic medication by Dr Riskin, while he continued to work, initially culminating
in a regression of his symptoms and improvement in function by around 2004. He
6 continued to function until the issues arising from the oncology conference in 2005 led
to a further flare up of his depressive disorder, which had receded but not resolved at
7 that time. Arising from this and its aftermath, he encountered a serious recurrence of his
depressive disorder, which has continued to the current time.
8
(Doc. 269 at 61.)
9
113. The County does not challenge that Plaintiff’s depression qualifies as “any mental . . .
10
disorder or condition” within the meaning of the FEHA. See Auburn Woods I Homeowners Ass’n v.
11
Fair Employment Hous. Comm’n, 121 Cal. App. 4th 1578, 1592-93 (2004) (“Numerous cases under
12
state and federal law have held that depression and its related manifestations can meet the definition of
13
disability under antidiscrimination laws.”).
14
114. Plaintiff has established that, at the time he sought a continuation of his reduced work
15
schedule, he was limited in the major life activity of working. His doctor’s certifications and his taking
16
of leave reveal that his mental condition made it difficult for him to work full-time, which is certainly a
17
“limitation” on working.
18
115. Bryan/County had sufficient knowledge of Plaintiff’s disability at the time of his
19
requested accommodation. Plaintiff’s January 9, 2006, letter to Bryan specifically stated that Plaintiff
20
had developed “depression and insomnia.” (Doc. 266 at 133.) In their response to Plaintiff’s statement
21
of undisputed material facts, Defendants concede that “[o]n January 9, 2006, Dr. Jadwin had asked
22
Defendant Bryan to allow him to work part-time and at home while he was recovering from his
23
disabling depression.” (Doc. 278 at 28) (emphasis added.) Defendants also concede that “Bryan
24
admitted knowing that Dr. Jadwin needed leave because of his depression.” (Doc. 278 at 27.) In
25
addition to these concessions, Bryan attached Plaintiff’s two requests for medical leave to the
26
memorandum he (Bryan) drafted summarizing the meeting on April 28, 2006. (Doc. 266-2 at 9-10.)
27
This demonstrates Bryan had access to some of Plaintiff’s leave-related documentation and knew of
28
Plaintiff’s medical request for additional leave. Both of his requests for medical leave also noted, on
1 their face, that they were accompanied by a “Physician’s Note.” (Id.).

2 116. Defendants concede that “Dr. Riskin’s certifications stated that Plaintiff needed
3 medical/recuperative leave for depression from December 16, 2005 to September 16, 2006.” (Doc. 278
4 at 27.) These forms indicated that Dr. Riskin’s practice was “psychiatry” and recommended that Plaintiff
5 work less than full-time. (Doc. 270 at 4-6.) See Faust, 150 Cal. App. 4th at 887 (concluding that the
6 employee’s submission of a chiropractor’s “work status report” stating that the employee was “‘unable
7 to perform regular job duties’” created a triable issue as to the employer’s knowledge of the employee’s
8 physical disability, noting that “an employer knows an employee has a disability when the employee
9 tells the employer about his condition, or when the employer otherwise becomes aware of the condition,
10 such as through a third party or by observation.”).
11 117. Because the JCC adopted Bryan’s recommendation, Bryan’s knowledge of Plaintiff’s
12 disability is sufficient (Plaintiff need not separately prove the JCC also had the requisite knowledge at
13 the time of the removal vote).
14 118. The County accommodated Plaintiff’s disability for four months, “from December 16,
15 2005 to April 16, 2006, by providing him with the reduced work schedule medical leave” that he had
16 requested. (Doc. 272 at 23.)
17 I. INTERACTIVE PROCESS
18 119. There can be no dispute that Plaintiff requested to continue working on a reduced
19 schedule.
20 J. DUE PROCESS
21 120. Any acts or omissions of the individual Defendants were under color of law. There is no
22 dispute that the conduct at issue in this case occurred under the color of state law. (Doc. 278 at 32.)
23 121. There can be no dispute that the JCC was acting pursuant to the bylaws in removing
24 Plaintiff from his chairmanship.
25 122. Dr. Leonard Perez’s employment was terminated for cause. (Doc. 267-2 at 145.)
26 123. It is clear that Plaintiff’s contract explicitly called for a base salary. (Doc. 266 at 10.) It is
27 equally clear that a public employee can obtain a property interest in his or her earned or guaranteed
28 compensation. Orloff v. Cleland, 708 F.2d 372, 378 (9th Cir. 1983); Eguia v. Tompkins, 756 F.2d 1130,

1 1138 (5th Cir. 1985).

2 124. Unquestionably, Plaintiff had a property interest in his guaranteed base salary (which he
3 was paid in full while on administrative leave).
4 125. Plaintiff’s employment contract states that his compensation will be “composed of a base
5 salary paid by the County, professional fee payments from third-party payors, and potential other
6 income . . . .” (Doc. 266 at 10.) Plaintiff’s employment contract further provides that “[p]rofessional fees
7 include all professional fee collections or payments associated with direct patient care by Core
8 Physician.” (Doc. 266 at 12.) In other words, in addition to base salary, Plaintiff generated professional
9 fees by performing services. In 2004, Plaintiff’s professional fees were $131,709; for 2005, they were
10 $103,444; and for 2006, they were $28,596.
11 126. Defendant admits that “Plaintiff was placed on paid administrative leave on December 7,
12 2006, pursuant to the Kern County Policy and Procedures Manual.” (Stmt of Undisp. Fact. ¶¶41, 41a).”
13 (Doc. 253 at 33.)
14 127. The section of the Kern County Policy and Procedures Manual (the “Manual”) on
15 “Administrative Leave With Pay” reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
16 A department head may place an employee on administrative leave with pay if the
department head determines that the employee is engaged in conduct posing a danger to
17 County property, the public or other employees, or the continued presence of the
employee at the work site will hinder an investigation of the employee’s alleged
18 misconduct or will severely disrupt the business of the department. During the
administrative leave, the employee shall be ordered to remain at home and available by
19 telephone during the normally assigned work day. A department head may, if necessary,
adjust the employee’s work schedule to provide availability during normal business
20 hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. A department head may not order
an administrative leave with pay for a period in excess of five assigned workdays within
21 a single pay period without the written authorization of the Employee Relations Officer
in the County Administrative Office.
22
(Doc. 259-10 at 40.)
23
128. For Monell purposes, no party disputes that the County’s Manual constitutes an official
24
policy of the County.
25
129. Plaintiff’s employment contract states that he must “comply with all applicable KMC and
26
County policies and procedures.” (Doc. 266 at 22.) The County obviously takes the position that the
27
Manual applied to Plaintiff’s employment.
28
130. According to the terms of his contract, his employment relationship could be terminated
1 “at any time for cause.” No other part of the contract gave the County the right to terminate his
2 employment relationship without cause. Therefore, Plaintiff had a property interest in his continued
3 employment relationship at least through the remainder of his term.
4 131. Plaintiff’s employment contract specified that he was subject to “all applicable KMC and
5 County policies and procedures.” (Doc. 266 at 22.) Once such policy was the Manual which provided
6 that Plaintiff could be placed on paid administrative leave with pay under certain specified
7 circumstances including when “the department head determines that the employee is engaged in conduct
8 posing a danger to County property, the public or other employees, or the continued presence of the
9 employee at the work site will hinder an investigation of the employee’s alleged misconduct or will
10 severely disrupt the business of the department.” No other provision of Plaintiff’s employment contract
11 granted the County the right to place Plaintiff on paid administrative leave. By specifying the grounds
12 on which Plaintiff could be placed on paid administrative leave, and by not contractually providing for
13 any other right to place Plaintiff on paid administrative leave, the County implicitly limited its authority
14 to place Plaintiff on paid leave to the specific reasons. See Sanchez, 915 F.2d at 429.
15 132. Plaintiff’s loss of potential professional fees was more than de minimis harm.
16 133. Both Plaintiff and the County certainly envisioned that Plaintiff would be in a position to
17 earn professional fees so that Plaintiff could obtain the fruits of his bargain.
18 134. Plaintiff did not receive essential attributes of due process. Plaintiff was placed on
19 administrative leave without any explanation as to what he had done or any opportunity to respond.
20 135. The County admits that it made a decision not to renew Plaintiff’s contract. (Doc. 278 at
21 7.) For Monell purposes, this is sufficient.
22 IV. DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES
23 1. Plaintiff contests Defendants’ averment that Plaintiff disrupted the October, 2005,
24 Monthly Oncology Conference and prevented appropriate discussion of case management and that other
25 physicians at Kern Medical Center, including some of the Defendants, were concerned about Plaintiff’s
26 conduct and with his interference with patient care.
27 2. Plaintiff contests all averments contained in the Answer to the Second Amended
28 Complaint other than those stated in Section III, Undisputed Facts.

V. DISPUTED EVIDENTIARY ISSUES

1
Plaintif intends to make extensive use of live and video deposition testimony, demonstrative
2
evidence, Powerpoint, Sanction, and other high technology.
3
Plaintiff intends to challenge the admissibility of the testimony and reports of Defendant’s
4
experts.
5
Plaintiff anticipates that his pre-trial motions in limine will include, but will not be limited to the
6
following:
7
1. To preclude the use of evidence or witnesses not previously disclosed to plaintiff during
8
discovery.
9
2. To preclude evidence, reference to evidence, testimony, or argument relating to any
10
previous or pending lawsuit(s) filed against any party involved in this lawsuit.
11
3. To preclude Defendants from raising any affirmative defenses that have not been
12
previously disclosed, asserted or discovered.
13
4. To preclude evidence, reference to evidence, testimony, or argument relating to Plaintiff’s
14
business venture, Columbia Healthcare Analytics, Inc.
15
5. To preclude Defendants from introducing opinion evidence from non-expert witnesses.
16
6. To reassert the evidentiary objections Plaintiff made with regard to the evidence submitted
17
in support of the motions for summary judgment/summary adjudication, herein.
18
VI. SPECIAL FACTUAL INFORMATION
19
Not applicable.
20
VII. RELIEF SOUGHT
21
Plaintiff brings this action for back pay and front pay; past and future emotional distress; FMLA
22
liquidated damages; general and compensatory damages; prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys’ fees;
23
injunctive and declaratory relief; and other appropriate and just relief resulting from Defendants’
24
unlawful conduct.
25
VIII. POINTS OF LAW
26
The Court has already adjudicated many of the essential elements of Plaintiff’s claims in its
27
Order of April 8, 2009 (Doc. 311) on the cross-motions for summary judgment/summary adjudication.
28
(See Undisputed Facts section supra). The following elements of Plaintiff’s claims remain in dispute.
1. FMLA/CFRA Interference
1
Plaintiff’s taking of FMLA/CFRA medical leave was a negative factor in adverse
2
employment actions that Defendant took against Plaintiff. Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.
3
259 F.3d 1112, 1122 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing 29 Code of Federal Regulations § 825.220(c); 2.C.C.R. §
4
7297.7.
5
Plaintiff had a medical need that was best accommodated through a reduced work schedule
6
leave. 29 CFR 825.202(b).
7
Defendant forced Plaintiff to take more medical leave than necessary to address the
8
circumstance that precipitated the need for the FMLA/CFRA leave. “An employee may not be
9
required to take more FMLA leave than necessary to address the circumstance that precipitated the need
10
for the leave.” 29 CFR 825.203(d). A triable issue remains as to whether, in the words of Plaintiff, the
11
County really “forced” him to take full-time FMLA leave even though he was entitled to a reduced leave
12
schedule. If Plaintiff can establish that he was entitled to a reduced leave schedule, and if the County
13
nonetheless forced him to take full-time FMLA leave instead, Plaintiff would have been forced to forgo
14
one right he had under the FMLA. See 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a) (making it “unlawful for any employer to
15
interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of or the attempt to exercise, any right provided under this
16
subchapter.”) 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a) (emphasis added); See Sista v. CDC Ixis North America, Inc., 445
17
F.3d 161, 175 (2nd Cir. 2006) (recognizing that while the FMLA says “nothing about an employer’s
18
ability to ‘force’ an employee to take” FMLA leave, “if the [plaintiff] were able to demonstrate that such
19
a forced leave interfered with, restrained, or denied the exercise or attempted exercise of a right provided
20
under the FMLA, a cause of action might lie.”); cf. Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc., 535 U.S.
21
81, 89-90 (2002) (recognizing that an employee might have a viable interference claim where the
22
employee could take intermittent or full-time leave; however, because the employer failed to notify the
23
employee of her rights under the FMLA, the employee unwittingly takes full-time leave instead of
24
intermittent leave such that she has “no leave remaining for some future emergency.”). The County
25
makes no argument that it is permissible under the FMLA for an employer to force an employee who is
26
entitled to a reduced leave schedule to take full-time FMLA leave instead.
27
Under the CFRA, it is unlawful for an employer “to refuse to grant a request” for CFRA leave
28
made by an eligible employee for a qualifying reason. Cal. Gov’t Code § 12945.2(a). Plaintiff makes the
1 same claim under the CFRA that he does under the FMLA – that he was “forced” to take full-time leave
2 when he was entitled to a reduced leave schedule. The same conclusions reached above apply equally to
3 this CFRA claim. See Liu, 347 F.3d at 1132 n.4 (recognizing that leave denial/interfence claims under
4 the CFRA and FMLA can be analyzed together “[s]ince CFRA adopts the language of the FMLA and
5 California state courts have held that the same standards apply.”).
6 Defendant interfered with Plaintiff’s medical leave rights by creating uncertainty as to the
7 timing and duration of his medical leaves. 29 CFR 825.205(b)(1) and (b)(3), 2 CCR
8 7297.4(a)(1)(A)(B).
9 Defendant’s violation of FMLA was willful in that Defendant failed to act in good faith and
10 lacked reasonable grounds for believing its actions were not a violation of FMLA. 29 USC
11 2617(a)(1)(A)(iii); Bachelder v. Am. W. Airlines, Inc., 259 F.3d 1112, 1130 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2001).
12 2. Oppositional Retaliation (FMLA/CFRA/FEHA)
13 Defendant Kern County discriminated against Plaintiff because he opposed practices that
14 he reasonably believed were illegal under FMLA/CFRA/FEHA. Gov’t Code 12940(h); 29 U.SC. §
15 2615(b)(2); Yanowitz v. L’Oreal 36 Cal. 4th 1028, 116 P.3d 1123 (2005); Flait v. North American
16 Watch Corporation (1992) 4 Cal. Rptr. 2d 522, 3 Cal. App. 4th 467; Gifford v. Atchison, Topeka &
17 Santa Fe Ry. Co. (9th Cir. 1982) 685 F.2d 1149, 1157;Trent v. Valley Elec. Ass’n Inc., 41 F.3d 524, 526
18 (9th Cir. 1994); Miller v. Dept. of Corrections (2005) 36 Cal.4th 446, 473-474 (protected “oppositional
19 activity” includes objecting to conduct that an employee reasonably believes is prohibited by
20 FMLA/CFRA/FEHA/TVII, even if s/he is incorrect and/or fails to use legal terms or buzzwords).
21 Under the FEHA, it is unlawful for an employer “to discharge, expel, or otherwise discriminate
22 against any person because the person has opposed any practices forbidden under this part or because
23 the person has filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in any proceeding under this part.” Cal. Gov’t
24 Code § 12940(h). To establish a prima facie case of retaliation under this section, a plaintiff must show:
25 (1) he engaged in protected activity; (2) he was thereafter subject to adverse employment action; and (3)
26 a causal link between the two. Yanowitz v. L’Oreal USA, Inc., 36 Cal. 4th 1028, 1042 (2005); Mathieu
27 v. Norrell Corp., 115 Cal. App. 4th 1174, 1185 (2004). “Essential to a causal link is evidence that the
28 employer was aware that the plaintiff had engaged in the protected activity.” Morgan, 88 Cal. App. 4th

1 at 70 (internal quotation marks omitted).

2 Under FMLA, Plaintiff must show that (i) he engaged in the protected activity; (ii) he was
3 subject to adverse employment action; and (iii) this occurred “because” he engaged in the protected
4 activity. Id.; cf. Trent v. Valley Elec. Ass’n Inc., 41 F.3d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1994) (articulating the
5 elements of a retaliation claim under the “opposition clause” of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a)).
6 Defendant Kern County discriminated against Plaintiff because he participated in
7 proceedings under or relating to FMLA/CFRA/FEHA.
8 The FMLA makes it unlawful for any person to “discharge or in any other manner discriminate
9 against any individual because such individual . . . has filed any charge, or has instituted or caused to be
10 instituted any proceeding, under or related to this subchapter.” 29 U.S.C. § 2615(b)(1) (emphasis
11 added); Gov’t Code 12940(h). The prima facie case for CFRA/FEHA/FMLA retaliation based on
12 Plaintiff’s participation activity is the same as that based on Plaintiff’s oppositional activity.
13 Defendant’s violation of FMLA was willful in that Defendant failed to act in good faith and
14 lacked reasonable grounds for believing its actions were not a violation of FMLA. 29 USC
15 2617(a)(1)(A)(iii); Bachelder v. Am. W. Airlines, Inc., 259 F.3d 1112, 1130 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2001).
16 3. Disability Discrimination
17 Plaintiff was able to perform the essential job duties of Chair of Pathology with reasonable
18 accommodation. In cases where a leave of absence may be a reasonable accommodation, the question
19 is not whether the employee can perform the essential functions of the job during the leave period.
20 Rather, the question is whether the leave of absence is likely to enable the employee, upon his return
21 from leave, to resume performing the essential functions of the job. Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 74
22 Cal. App. 4th 215, 226 (1999); Humphrey v. Mem’l Hosps. Ass’n, 239 F.3d 1128, 1135-36 (9th Cir.
23 2001); Nunes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 164 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff also sought other
24 forms of reasonable accommodation.
25 Plaintiff’s disability was a motivating factor in Defendant’s disparate treatment of Plaintiff.
26 Under the FEHA, it is unlawful for an employer “because of” a person’s “physical disability, mental
27 disability, [or] medical condition” to “refuse to hire or employ the person” or “to discharge or to bar the
28 person from employment” or to “discriminate against the person in compensation or in terms,

1 conditions, or privileges of employment.” Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(a). Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc. 546
2 U.S. 454 (courts should not adopt an overly restrictive test to determine who may constitute
3 comparators).
4 To establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination, Plaintiff must show: (1) that he
5 suffered from a disability of which the employer was aware; (2) that, notwithstanding his disability, he
6 could perform the essential functions of his job with or without reasonable accommodation, and (3) that
7 he was subjected to an adverse employment action because of his disability. See Green v. State, 42 Cal.
8 4th 254, 262, 264 (2007); Nadar-Rahrov, 166 Cal. App. 4th at 964; Finegan v. County of Los Angeles,
9 91 Cal. App. 4th 1, 7 (2001). To satisfy the third element, among other things, “a plaintiff must prove
10 the employer had knowledge of the employee’s disability when the adverse employment decision was
11 made.” Brundage, 57 Cal. App. 4th at 236-37; see also Avila, 165 Cal. App. 4th at 1248 (“[T]o show
12 that Continental acted with discriminatory intent, plaintiff was required to produce evidence that the
13 Continental employees who decided to discharge him knew of his disability.”).
14 “Liability for disability discrimination does not require professional understanding of the
15 plaintiff’s condition. It is enough to show that the defendant knew of symptoms raising an inference that
16 the plaintiff was disabled.” Sanglap, 345 F.3d at 520.
17 Defendant failed to provide a reasonable accommodation of Plaintiff’s disability. Under the
18 FEHA, it is unlawful for an employer to “to fail to make reasonable accommodation for the known
19 physical or mental disability of an applicant or employee”. Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(m). It is unclear
20 whether Plaintiff is required to prove he was otherwise qualified to perform the essential functions of the
21 job as part of this claim. CACI 2541; Nadaf-Rahrov v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 166 Cal. App. 4th
22 952, 977-79 (2008); Jensen v. Wells Fargo Bank, 85 Cal. App. 4th 245, 256 (2000); Diaz v. Fed.
23 Express Corp., 373 F. Supp. 2d 1034, 1054 (C.D. Cal. 2005).
24 Hanson, 74 Cal. App. 4th at 226 (“As long as a reasonable accommodation available to the
25 employer could have plausibly enabled a handicapped employee to adequately perform his job, an
26 employer is liable for failing to attempt that accommodation.”) (internal quotation marks omitted);
27 Placement on full-time leaves starting April 28, 2006 was not a reasonable accommodation of
28 Plaintiff’s disability. If the County simply forced Plaintiff to take a full-time leave that was not

1 mandated by his doctor nor medically better for Plaintiff in any event, a reasonable jury could conclude
2 that the County’s accommodation was unreasonable. (“[A] finite leave can be a reasonable
3 accommodation under FEHA, provided it is likely that at the end of the leave, the employee would be
4 able to perform his or her duties.”); Humphrey v. Mem’l Hosps. Ass’n, 239 F.3d 1128, 1135-36 (9th Cir.
5 2001) (recognizing that a leave of absence may be a reasonable accommodation under the ADA where it
6 “would reasonably accommodate an employee’s disability and permit him, upon his return, to perform
7 the essential functions of the job”).
8 Reduced work schedule leave and permitting work from home until 9/16/06 was a
9 reasonable accommodation of Plaintiff’s disability. Nadaf-Rahrov, 166 Cal. App. 4th at 979.
10 Working part-time while making a “gradual return to full-time work” can be a reasonable
11 accommodation. Pals v. Schepel Buick & GMC Truck, Inc., 220 F.3d 495, 498 (7th Cir. 2000). Nunes,
12 164 F.3d at 1247 (“Even an extended medical leave, or an extension of an existing leave period, may be
13 a reasonable accommodation”) (emphasis added).
14 Defendant failed to engage in a timely, good faith interactive process with Plaintiff
15 regarding accommodation of his disability. Under the FEHA, it is unlawful for an employer “to fail to
16 engage in a timely, good faith, interactive process with the employee or applicant to determine effective
17 reasonable accommodations, if any, in response to a request for reasonable accommodation by an
18 employee or applicant with a known physical or mental disability or known medical condition.” Cal.
19 Gov’t Code § 12940(n). “I[t] is the employee’s initial request for an accommodation which triggers the
20 employer’s obligation to participate in the interactive process of determining one.” Spitzer v. Good
21 Guys, Inc., 80 Cal. App. 4th 1376, 1384 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted).
22 “[T]he interactive process requires communication and good-faith exploration of possible
23 accommodations between employers and individual employees with the goal of identify[ing] an
24 accommodation that allows the employee to perform the job effectively. . . . [F]or the process to work
25 [b]oth sides must communicate directly, exchange essential information and neither side can delay or
26 obstruct the process. When a claim is brought for failure to reasonably accommodate the claimant’s
27 disability, the trial court’s ultimate obligation is to isolate the cause of the breakdown . . . and then
28 assign responsibility so that [l]iability for failure to provide reasonable accommodations ensues only

1 where the employer bears responsibility for the breakdown.” Nadaf-Rahrov, 166 Cal. App. 4th at 985
2 (alteration in original) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
3 4. Due Process Violation
4 Plaintiff had a constitutionally protectable property right in avoiding placement on
5 administrative leave. To have a viable claim then, Plaintiff must demonstrate that his property interest
6 in continued employment included a property right in “active duty,” Deen v. Darosa, 414 F.3d 731, 734
7 (7th Cir. 2005), or, as the Ninth Circuit has suggested, a “property interest in avoiding placement on
8 administrative leave with pay.” Qualls v. Cook, 245 F. App’x 624, 625 (9th Cir. 2007). Qualls v. Cook,
9 245 F. App’x 624, 625 (9th Cir. 2007).
10 By specifying the grounds on which Plaintiff could be placed on paid administrative leave, and
11 by not contractually providing for any other right to place Plaintiff on paid administrative leave, the
12 County implicitly limited its authority to place Plaintiff on paid leave to the specific reasons. See
13 Sanchez, 915 F.2d at 429.
14 Finally, there is some California authority that a physician who is employed under a fixed term
15 contract with a County and who is acting lawfully and complying with the terms of his contract cannot
16 be prevented “from performing the duties incumbent on him” for arbitrary reasons. Grindley v. Santa
17 Cruz County, 4 P. 390, 393 (Cal. 1884). While ancient and in no way dispositive, this case lends support
18 to the position that, by having a fixed term contract with the County with a general property right in
19 continued employment, Plaintiff may have had a concomitant property right in active duty during the
20 term of his employment.
21 5. Causation/Damages
22 Plaintiff was harmed by Defendant’s adverse employment actions, interference and
23 discrimination against him.
24 Defendant’s adverse employment actions, interference and discrimination were a
25 substantial cause of Plaintiff’s harms resulting in his entitlement to damages.
26 It is unclear whether Plaintiff or Defendant bears the burden of proof to show Plaintiff
27 mitigated (or failed to mitigate) damages.
28 All damages are available to Plaintiff under Cal. Govt. C. 12926(b). 2 CCR 7286.9. See also

1 Aguilar v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 121, 132 (“We have held ‘that, in a civil
2 action under the FEHA, all relief generally available in noncontractual actions . . . may be obtained.’
3 This includes injunctive relief.”)(internal citations omitted.); Bihun v. AT&T Information Systems, Inc.,
4 13 Cal. App. 4th 976 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1993) (front pay is a permitted remedy for FEHA violations
5 and does not need to be substantiated by expert testimony); Cassino v. Reichold Chemicals, Inc., 817
6 F.2d 1338. (9th Cir. 1987).
7 IX. ABANDONED ISSUES
8 None.
9 X. WITNESSES
10 Plaintiff reserves the right to call any witnesses identified by Defendant.
11 Plaintiff’s Witness List (* Designated Expert Witnesses are Starred)
Full Name Title Addresses
12
Jennifer Past President, Medical Staff & 1830 Flower Street
13 Abraham, M.D. Member, Medical Executive Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
Committee 661‐873‐7370
14
15
Paramaswaren Chair, Pediatrics & Member, University Multispecialty Physicians of Kern
16 Aiylam, M.D. Medical Executive Committee
17
18
George Alkhouri, Resident, Pathology 1830 Flower Street
19 M.D. Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2000
20 Navin Amin, Member, Medical Executive Kern Medical Center / University Multispecialty
21 M.D. Committee Physicians of Kern 1830 Flower Street
Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
22 661‐326‐5052
23 Elsa Ang, M.D. Former Pathologist 4200 Sill Pl, Bakersfield 93306‐3151

Dennis Arquette, Locum Tenens Histotech Victorville area (760‐490‐3291 cell)
24 M.D.
25 Nitin Athavale, Radiologist
M.D.
26 Sundee Baker
27 Erin Baldwin, Former Resident 18 Lassen Dr, Santa Barbara, CA 93111
M.D.
28 Bernie Barmann, County Counsel Office of County Counsel, 1115 Truxton Ave, 4th Fl,
Esq. Bakersfield, CA 93301, (661) 868‐3800

1
Sonya Barnard Locum Tenens 1830 Flower Street
2 Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2000
3
Karen Barnes, Chief Deputy County Counsel Office of County Counsel, 1115 Truxton Ave, 4th Fl,
4 Esq. Bakersfield, CA 93301, (661) 326‐2029
cell: 661‐331‐9280
5
Brenda Bassham Secretary, QMC 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2000
7
Vivek Bhargava, Locum Tenens 151 Garcia, San Francisco, CA 94127 415‐759‐9695
8 M.D.
Jack Bloch, M.D. Surgeon, Former Chair of Surgery 1830 Flower Street
10 661‐326‐2000
Robin Bowe Clinical Manager 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2000
12
Phil Brown IT 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2000
14
Peter Bryan Former Chief Executive Officer 6424 S Abilene St, Centennial, CO 80111
15
16 Ellen Bunyi‐ Former Pathologist 10518 Ascot Crossing St, Bakersfield, CA 93311‐3511,
Teopengco, M.D. 661‐204‐5682
17 661‐201‐9772
18 Michele Burris Supervisor, Blood Bank 1830 Flower Street

19 661‐326‐2464
20 William Busch, ENT Surgeon 1830 Flower Street

MD Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
21 661‐326‐2000
22 Michael Cann, Current ‐ Treating Orthopedic 1818 Verdugo Blvd Ste 201

M.D. Surgeon (cervical and lumbar Verdugo Orthopedic Medical Grp
23 discs and shoulder rotator cuff Glendale, CA 91208
injury) T: (818) 949‐7380
24 F: (818) 949‐7384
25
26
27
28


1
Parakrama Professor GNH2900
2 Chandrasoma, Keck School of Medicine of USC
M.D. 1200 North State Street
3 Los Angeles, California 90033
Phone: (323) 226‐4600
4
Fax: (323) 226‐5927
5 E‐mail: ptchandr@usc.edu

6 LAC‐USC Medical Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033, 323‐
226‐4600
7 Christopher J. Current ‐ Anesthesiologist/Pain 1505 Wilson Terrace #240
8 Charbonnet, Specialist (epidurals to lumbar Glendale, CA 91206
M.D. back) T: (818) 241‐7246
9 F: (818) 241‐5397
10
Sandra Chester Director, Human Resources at 1830 Flower Street
11 Kern Medical Center & Former Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
COO 661‐326‐2000
12

13 2207 CROCUS DR, BAKERSFIELD CA 93311‐3746
661‐858‐0012
14
Charles Clayton Lab Manager 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2000
16
17
18
William Colburn, Pathologist Consultant Encino‐Tarzana Regional Medical Center
19 MD Department of Anatomic Pathology
18321 Clark Street
20 Tarzana, California 91356
818‐708‐5528
21
818‐992‐7848
22
Mary Cortez Former Secretary, Pathology 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2161
24
Michael Costa, Locum Tenens Pathologist 1451 W. Willow St, Stockton, CA 95203
25 MD
David K. Interim Chief Executive Officer The Camden Group ‐ Los Angeles
26 Culberson 100 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 600
27 El Segundo, CA 90245
Phone: (310) 320‐3990
28 President: Steven Valentine


1
Phillip Dutt, M.D. Pathologist Consultant 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2256
3
Ronald M. Errea County Administrative Officer County Administrative Officer, 1115 Truxton Ave, 4th
4 Fl, Bakersfield, CA 93301
5
Wafika Fahmy, Former Chief Resident, OB/GYN 9008 Summer Creek Road
6 M.D. Bakersfield, CA 93311
(661) 663‐ 3876
7
Yolanda Figueroa Histology Manager 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2448
9 Vincent F. Current ‐ Treating Neurologist 665 West Naomi #201
10 Fortanasce, M.D. (cervical and lumbar disc disease Arcadia, CA 91007
and rotator cuff injury) T: (626) 445‐2310
11 F: (626) 574‐9669
12
Sheldon Former Chair, Pathology & 3219 Peace Rose Court, Bakersfield 93311 661‐664‐
13 Freedman, M.D. Member, Medical Executive 9977
Committee
14
15
16 Evangeline Histotech 1830 Flower Street
Gallegos‐ Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
17 Tolentino 661‐326‐2000
18 Beverly Gambrell Locum Tenens bevgambrell@yahoo.com

Carol Gates Former Secretary, Pathology 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2657
20
Kathy Griffith 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2441
22
Irwin Harris Former Chief Medical Officer 8848 Sierra Oak Drive, Bakersfield, CA 93311
23 (661) 664‐1620
Paul Hensler Chief Executive Officer, Kern 1830 Flower Street
24
Medical Center Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
25 661‐326‐2000
David F. Jadwin Former Chair, Pathology 1635 Heather Ridge Dr, Glendale, CA 91207‐1035,
26
(818) 245‐1403
27 Penny Jadwin Wife 1635 Heather Ridge Dr, Glendale, CA 91207‐1035,
(818) 245‐1403
28


1
Royce Johnson, Chair, Cancer Committee and Kern Medical Center / University Multispecialty
2 M.D. Chair, Department of Medicine; Physicians of Kern 1830 Flower Street
Member, Medical Executive Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
3 Conference 661‐326‐2000
4
5
6 Cecilia Kaesler, Current ‐ Internal Medicine 1809 Verdugo BLVD, Ste 200
M.D. (Regular physician) Glendale, CA 91208
7 T: 818‐790‐6225
F: (818) 790‐2816
8
Eugene Kercher, Past President, Medical Staff & Kern Medical Center / UMPK1830 Flower Street
9 M.D. Current Chief Medical Officer Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2159
10
11 Jack King University Multispecialty 1830 Flower Street
12 Physicians of Kern Office Staff Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2000
13
14 Marvin Kolb Former Chief Medical Officer 10708 North Essex Court, Mequon, WI 53092

15 West Allis Memorial
8901 West Lincoln Ave
16 West Allis, Wisconsin 53220
414‐328‐6889
17

18 Larry F. Peake, Esq.
Wall, Wall & Peake
19 1601 F Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
20 (661) 327‐8461 office
21 (661) 327‐8568 fax
Prisca ‐ secty ‐ x117 ‐ calendar
22
23 * Regina Levison President President
Levison Search Associates
24 P. O. Box 1133
El Dorado, CA 95623
25
800‐538‐4766, ext. 100
26 530‐409‐0263 cell
27 David Lieu, M.D. Pathologist Consultant 1613 Chelsea Road, Ste 323, San Marino, CA 91108
28


1
Cindy Lighthill Director, University University Multispecialty Physicians of Kern
2 Multispecialty Physicians of Kern
3
Tracy Lindsey Secretary, Plaintiff 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2256
5
Martin Lipschulz, Locum Tenens Pathologist 716 Meadow Lane, South Minneapolis, MN55416‐
6 M.D. 3417
Denise Long 1830 Flower Street
8 661‐326‐3162
Irene Lopez Clerk, Pathology 1830 Flower Street
10 661‐326‐2000
Dennis Maceri, Treating Neuro‐Otologic Surgeon 1520 San Pablo Street, Suite 4600
11 M.D. (for cranial cholesterol Los Angeles, CA 90033
granuloma) T (323) 442‐6865
12
F (323) 442‐5820
13
14 Joseph Mansour, OB/GYN 1508 Avonlea Street 93311
M.D.
15 Katrina Manual Former Secretary, Pathology 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2000
17 Maureen Martin, Chief, Surgery Kern Medical Center / UMPK1830 Flower Street
M.D. Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
18
661‐326‐2275
19 Kenneth Matley Treating Physical Therapist Verdugo Hills Hospital, 1812 Verdugo Blvd, Glendale,
CA 91208, Tel: (818) 952‐2294, Fax:: (818) 952‐4636
20
Albert McBride, Urologist 215 Winterton Court 93312
21 M.D. 1830 Flower Street
22 661‐326‐2286
23 Carolyn Mell
24 William Meyers, Neurosurgeon 2201 Mount Vernon Avenue, Suite 211 93306
MD
25 Alan Morrill Locum Tenens Histotech (817) 441‐7002 Morrilla@sbcglobal.net
26
Javad Naderi, Chair, Radiology & Member, 7900 Camino Media 93309 / Kern Medical Center
27 M.D. Medical Executive Committee 1830 Flower Street
28 661‐326‐2119


1
Mark Nations, Chief Deputy Kern County Counsel
2 Esq. 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Fourth Floor
3 Phone: (661) 868‐3800
Fax: (661) 868‐3805
4
E‐mail: mnations@co.kern.ca.us
5
Renita Nunn Employment Specialist 1830 Flower Street
661‐326‐2000
7 Steve O’Connor Director of Human Resources at 1830 Flower Street
8 Kern Medical Center Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2000
9 Stephen Owens, Treating Orthopedist 1818 Verdugo Blvd, Ste. 402 Glendale, CA 91208
10 M.D. Tel: (818) 952‐2712
Fax: (818) 952‐4152
11 attn: Dena
12 Paul Palmeri Locum Tenens Histotech (704) 650‐1056
13 Patricia Parada Clerical Staff, Pathology 1830 Flower Street

661‐326‐2000
15
patty_parada@hotmail.com
16
Ravindranath Chair, Cancer Committee Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Ctr, 6501 Truxton
17 Patel, M.D. Ave, Bakersfield, CA 93309
18 Barbara Patrick Supervisor ‐ former barbara@greatvalley.org

19 Great Valley Center
201 Needham Street
20 Modesto, CA 95354

21
Tel (209) 522‐5103
22 Fax (209) 522‐5116
www.greatvalley.org
23
Jose Perez, M.D. Director, Medical Education & Methodist Hospital (Houston)
24
Non‐voting member, Medical 6550 Fannin, Suite 1101
25 Executive Committee Houston, TX 77030
(713) 441‐0006
26
27
28


1
Leonard Perez, Chair, OBGYN 9201 Laramie Avenue
lperez314@aol.com
3
1524 17th Street, Suite 201
4
5 661 322‐6700 Office
661 322‐6707 Fax
6 661 747‐7221 Cell
7 Patricia Perez Human Resources at Kern 1830 Flower Street

8 Medical Center Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2615
9 Fernando Plastic Surgeon 1830 Flower Street
10 Prunes, M.D. Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2000
11 Tom Purcell, Chief Executive Officer, Director, University Multispecialty Physicians of Kern
12 M.D. University Multispecialty
Physicians of Kern & Member,
13 Quality Management Committee
14
15
16 James Pussevant Microbiology Supervisor 1830 Flower Street
17 661‐326‐2000
Alan Scott President‐Elect, Medical Staff 1830 Flower Street
18
Ragland, M.D. Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
19 661‐872‐8559
Margo A. Raison County Counsel Office of County Counsel, 1115 Truxton Ave, 4th Fl,
20
Bakersfield, CA 93301, (661) 868‐3876
21 Arlene Ramos‐ Secretary, Peter Bryan 8207 MAPLE GROVE LN, BAKERSFIELD CA 93312‐6623
Aninion 661‐587‐0009
22
23 661‐205‐1478
24
25
26
27
28


1
* Anthony 462 North Linden Dr Ste 445
2 Reading Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Bus: (310) 276‐3545
3 Mobile: (310) 927‐5496
E‐mail: aereading@aol.com
4
Denise Rhynes Former Secretary, Pathology 661‐873‐7377 home
5
6 Rebecca Rivera, OB/GYN 4100 Empire Drive Suite 120 93309
M.D.
7
* Stephanie President 140 South Lake Avenue, Suite 230
8 Rizzardi Pasadena, CA 91101
Bus: (626) 229‐0304
9 E‐mail: srizzardi@rizzardipearson.com
10 William Roy, Director, Gynecologic‐Oncology Pacific Gynecologic Specialists (Dr. Roy was a general

M.D. partner in the group)
11 501 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank, CA 91505
12 Phone: (818) 847‐4431
13 Managing general partner: Richard Lynn ??.
Friedman, MD
14 Michael Rubio Supervisor 1115 Truxtun Avenue, 5th Floor
15 Phone (661) 868‐3690
16 FAX (661) 868‐3645
district5@co.kern.ca.us
17
Homayoun Central California Faculty Medical Group
18 Sadeghi, M.D. 4910 E. Clinton, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93727‐1505
19 (559) 453‐5200
Fax:(559) 453‐5233
20 Nicole Sharkey Senior Resident at Kern Medical Twentynine Palms, CA
21 Center M:408‐394‐6222
NLSharkey@hotmail.com
22 Savita P. Staff Pathologist 1830 Flower Street
23 Shertukde, M.D. Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2595
24 Toni Smith, R.N. Nurse Executive & Member, 1830 Flower Street
25 Medical Executive Committee Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2688
26
27 Irene Spinello, Intensivist (ICU) 1830 Flower Street
MD Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
28 661‐326‐2000


1
James Sproul, Family Practice 1830 Flower Street
2 M.D. Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2000
3
Gerald Starr
4 Milan Treating Orthopedic Surgeon 1520 San Pablo Street, Suite 2000
Stevanovic, M.D. Los Angeles, CA 90033‐4608
5 T: (323) 442‐5860
F: (323) 442‐6990
6
F: (323) 442‐6975
7
Kevin Taubman, Chief Resident, Surgery 1830 Flower Street
8 MD Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
661‐326‐2000
9 Edward Taylor, Vice‐Chief, Surgery 3208 Panorama Dr
(661) 873‐7370
11 Paul Toffel, M.D. Current ‐ Treating ENT 1808 Verdugo Blvd, Suite 418, Glendale, CA 91208,
12 Tel: 818‐790‐3172, Fax: 818‐790‐3807
Ted Uchio, MD Anesthesiologist & Member, Sierra Pacific Ansths Med Associates 933866457
13 Quality Assurance Committee
14
15 Mark Wasser, Law Offices of Mark Wasser
16 Esq. 400 Capitol Mall Ste 2640
Sacramento, CA 95814
17 Phone: (916) 444‐6400
Fax: (916) 444‐6405
18 E‐mail: mwasser@markwasser.com
19 Robert G. Treating Neurosurgeon (cervical The Marina Spine Center
Watkins, M.D. disc) 13160 Mindanao Way, Suite 325
20
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
21 T: (310) 361‐6202
22 Ray Watson Supervisor Fourth District Contact Information

1115 Truxtun Avenue
23 Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 868‐3680
24 Fax: (661) 868‐3688
district4@co.kern.ca.us
25
26
27
28


1
* Lawrence Chair, Division of Pathology Chair, Division of Pathology
2 Weiss, M.D. City of Hope ??
1500 E. Duarte Rd
3 Duarte, CA 91010
T: (866) 434‐4673F: (716) 689‐6187
4
lawrence_weiss@excite.com
5 jadwinweiss@gmail.com
(626) 397‐2779 Home
6
Michael Wells, Radiologist Kern Radiology Medical Group 93309
7 M.D.
8 Bob Woods, Esq. County Counsel Lake Isabella

9 MAMMOTH LAKES, CA 93546‐9999
760‐924‐5862
10
11 St Peter Episcopal Church?
11900 Sierra Way
12 Kernville, CA 93238
(760) 376‐6362
13
14 Gian A. Yakoub Staff Pathologist 1830 Flower Street
15 661‐326‐2000
16 Tai Yoo, M.D. Chief, Psychiatry & Member, Kern Medical Center / UMPK1830 Flower Street

Medical Executive committee Bakersfield, CA 93305‐4197
17 661‐326‐2000
18
Michael Young, Former Counsel to Plaintiff Young & Nichols, 1901 Truxtun Ave, Bakersfield, CA
19 Esq. 93301
20 XI. EXHIBITS - SCHEDULES AND SUMMARIES

21 Plaintiff may use the following documents:
22 All complaints and answers on file.
23 All exhibits used in all depositions.
24 All documents produced in discovery, including but not limited to:
25
26 Date Type + Author(s) Full Name
TBD Internal Phillip Dutt, M.D. NEW Memo (RoyW)‐BarnesK Colburn
27 memo
28

Date Type + Author(s) Full Name

1
TBD Internal 27004 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
2 memo
3 memo
4 TBD Handwritten Alan Scott Ragland, NEW Notes RaglandS Peer Review
notes M.D.
5
6 TBD Internal 26993 860224 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
memo
7
8 TBD Internal 27016 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
memo
9
TBD Policy Kern County Policy and Administrative
10 Procedures Manual
11
TBD Handwritten Phillip Dutt, M.D. NEW Notes DuttP
12 notes
TBD Internal 10924 Path Dept Salary Comparison
13 memo
14 TBD Internal Ravindranath Patel, Guidelines PatelR+McBrideA+QuinonezB
memo M.D., Albert McBride, Cancer Conference
15 M.D., Bonnie Quinonez
16
TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI Disciplinary Procedures
17 notes
18
TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI Return to Work
19 notes
memo
memo
22
TBD Letter NEW Draft Memo KMC‐JadwinD Report to
23 NPDB
24
TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI Behavior
25 notes
26 TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI Medical Officer Mediation
notes
27
28 TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI Salary Calculations
notes


1
TBD Handwritten David K. Culberson NEW Notes1 criticizing DFJ
2 notes
TBD Internal 27015 770405 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
3 memo
4
TBD Policy David F. Jadwin NEW Gross Station Rules
5
memo
7
TBD Printout Alan Scott Ragland, 26367 FNA Investigation
8 M.D.
TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes2
9 notes
10 TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI Defamation
notes
11
TBD Handwritten Phillip Dutt, M.D. NEW Notes
12 notes
TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI JCC Meeting & Return to
13 notes Work
14
TBD E‐mail Toni Smith, R.N. 000000 Email Smith‐DFJ PCC
15
memo
17 TBD Handwritten Irwin Harris NEW Notes HarrisI Amendment to Contract
18 notes

20 memo
TBD Internal 27000 800601 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
21 memo
22
23 memo
memo
25 TBD Form David F. Jadwin JadwinD Timesheets
26
11/21/1976 Internal 27028 761121 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
27 memo
28


1
2 memo
3
7/7/1977 Internal 27010 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
4 memo
7/13/1977 Internal 27011 770713 Medical Staff Eval Johnson
5 memo
6
7 memo
8
9 memo
10
1/20/1987 Internal Jack Bloch, M.D. 27058 870120 Memo BlochJ‐MEC JohnsonR
11 memo
12
2/11/1987 Internal BrewerS 27057 870211 Memo BrewerS‐JohnsonR
13 memo JohnsonR
14
15 8/24/1987 Internal 26989 870824 Medical Staff Eval JohnsonR
16 memo
17 9/9/1987 Internal Sheldon Freedman, 27059 870909 Memo FreedmanS‐LangJ

memo M.D. FreedmanS
18
19 9/10/1987 Internal Michael Corder 27060 870910 Memo CorderM‐LangG
memo FreedmanS
20
21 2/12/1992 Internal Sheldon Freedman, 27062 920212 JohnsonR Behavior
memo M.D.
22
23 memo
24
10/23/1995 Internal StarrG 27056 951023 Memo StarrG‐LomelyP JohnsonR
25 memo
26
1/4/1996 Internal Carolyn Mell 27040 960104 Letter MellC‐SmithD JohnsonR
27 memo
28


1
1/5/1996 Internal Sundee Baker 27043 960105 Letter BakerS‐Personnel
2 memo
3
1/29/1996 Internal Gerald Starr 27039 960129 Memo StarrG‐JohnsonR
4 memo JohnsonR
5
6 4/4/1997 Internal Carolyn Mell 27036 970404 Memo MellC‐ArsuraE JohnsonR
memo
7
8 4/5/1997 Internal DolanS 27035 970405 Memo DolanS‐StarrJ‐ErenbergA
memo JohnsonR
9
10
4/17/1997 Internal FinneganJ 27240 970417 TaylorE Behavior
11 memo
12 4/18/1997 Internal Gerald Starr 27032 970418 Memo StarrG‐JohnsonR
memo JohnsonR
13
14
5/5/1997 Internal Edward Taylor, M.D. 27242 970505 TaylorE Behavior
15 memo
16 5/8/1997 Internal Gerald Starr 27037 970508 Memo StarrG‐JohnsonR
memo JohnsonR
17
18
8/22/2000 Policy Pro Forma Employment Agreement
19
20
10/13/2000 Personnel David F. Jadwin 001013 California Participating Physician
21 File Application
22
23 10/24/2000 Contract David F. Jadwin, Kay F. 001024‐2 Employment Agreement 1
Madden, Bernie
24 Barmann, Esq., Peter
25 Bryan, petersonk
10/30/2000 Personnel David F. Jadwin 001030‐2 CV
26 File
27 11/2/2000 Personnel McCordR 001102 Reference Check

File
28 11/30/2000 Personnel Allan Lempel, M.D. 001130 Lempel Report
File

1
12/4/2000 Personnel David F. Jadwin 001204‐5 Outside Employment Approval
2 File Request
3
6/6/2001 Policy FPP Bylaws
4 6/16/2001 Internal Ana Moreno 27112 010616 MansourJ Behavior
memo
5
9/25/2001 Internal Marvin Kolb 27430 010925 MansourJ
6 memo
10/29/2001 Letter ACS 011029 NEW Letter ACS CoC‐BryanP 2001
7 Survey Results
8
9
2/4/2002 Internal Leonard Perez, M.D. 27377 020204 MansourJ
10 memo
3/8/2002 Internal Peter Bryan 020308 NEW Memo BryanP‐
11 memo AminN+JohnsonR+KolbM+PerezJ+SproulJ
12 Investigation Materials ‐ Billing Fraud
13
14
15 3/12/2002 Internal Marvin Kolb 020312 NEW Letter KolbM‐PerezJ Final Report ‐
16 memo Billing Fraud
17
18 3/12/2002 Handwritten Marvin Kolb 020312 NEW Notes (BryanP) Billing Fraud
notes
19
20 3/19/2002 Letter DicksonK 27376 020319 MansourJ
21 4/5/2002 Internal Leonard Perez, M.D. 27444 020405 MansourJ

memo
22
4/12/2002 Letter Peter Bryan 27381 020412 RiveraR
23
24 4/18/2002 E‐mail Peter Bryan 27271 020418 Email BryanP‐KolbM RiveraR
25
26 4/25/2002 Letter David F. Jadwin 020425 NEW Letter JadwinD‐BryanP Request
for Pay Raise
27
28


1
6/4/2002 Internal Leonard Perez, M.D. 27447 MansourJ
2 memo
6/26/2002 Internal Michael Ewald 27302 020626 Memo AdamsL‐EwaldM RiveraR
3 memo
4
10/31/2002 Personnel David F. Jadwin 021031‐1 California Participating Physician
5 File Application 02‐04
6
7
11/12/2002 Minutes Board of Supervisors 021112‐2 Bd of Super approve superseding
8 contract
9
10 11/12/2002 Contract David F. Jadwin, Peter 021112‐2 Amendment 1 to Contract1
Bryan, Kay F. Madden,
11 perezs, Karen Barnes,
Esq.
12
11/12/2002 Contract David F. Jadwin, Peter 021112‐1 Employment Agreement 2
13 Bryan, Kay F. Madden,
Steven A. Perez, Karen
14 Barnes, Esq.
11/18/2002 Internal Maureen Martin, M.D. 021118 NEW Memo MartinM‐JadwinD
15 memo Evaluations
16
11/20/2002 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 021120 NEW Memo JadwinD‐MartinM
17 Evaluations
18
1/7/2003 Minutes Navin Amin, M.D. 9157 030107 MEC Minutes JohnsonR Removal
19
20
03/03/03 Internal BryanP 0010925 030303 BryanP Praise
21 memo
22
11/20/2003 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 031120 Email JadwinD‐RaglandS+KolbM QMM
23 Mtg Time Allocation
24
25
26 11/22/2003 Letter David F. Jadwin 031122 Letter JadwinD‐KolbM Protest re FNA‐
Ragland‐Abraham
27
28


1
12/26/2003 Printout SmithAr 031226 Change of Employee Status ‐ Salary
2 Increase
3
1/1/2004 Reference ACS CoC 040101 NEW ACS CoC Oncology Conf Standards
4
5
1/6/2004 Minutes Medical Executive 040106 NEW Minutes MEC FNA
6 Conference
1/21/2004 Internal Alan Scott Ragland, 040121 Memo RaglandS‐JadwinD+KolbM QMM
7 memo M.D. Time Quota
8
9 2/4/2004 Policy David F. Jadwin 26391 040204 PathD Policy
10
4/6/2004 Policy KMC Organization and Functions Manual
11
12
5/3/2004 Report David Lieu, M.D. 040503 Lieus FNA Counsultant’s Report
13
14
9/3/2004 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 040903 Email JadwinD‐KercherE+KolbM FNA
15 Policy inadequate
16
17
18 10/4/2004 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 041004 Email JadwinD‐PerezL+RoyW Roy IPR
Requests
19
20
11/1/2004 Internal Peter Bryan 041101 Letter BryanP‐JadwinD Reappointment
21 memo
22
12/9/2004 E‐mail Peter Bryan 041209 Email BryanP‐JadwinD FNA Policy
23 Feedback from UCLA
24
25
12/13/2004 Policy KMC Bylaws
26
1/19/2005 Policy FPB Compensation Policy
27
28


1
2/1/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050201‐1 Email JadwinD‐KercherE FNA Policy
2 Draft complaint
3
4 2/1/2005 E‐mail Eugene Kercher, M.D. 050201‐2 Email KercherE‐JadwinD+BryanP FNA
& Lieu
5
6
2/2/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050202 Email JadwinD‐BryanP FNA policy and
7 radiology dispute
8
9 2/22/2005 Presentation David F. Jadwin 050222‐3 QMM Presentation UCLA Review of
10 FNAs
11 2/24/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050224 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Regular

12 Meetings with BryanP
13
14 2/25/2005 E‐mail Alan Scott Ragland, 050225 Email RaglandS‐JadwinD+KercherE FNA
M.D. & Radiology dispute
15
16
17 2/28/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050228 Email JadwinD‐KercherE+BryanP
Impaired Physician
18
19
20 3/2/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050305 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Regular
Meetings with BryanP
21
22
3/3/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 050303‐1 Letter JadwinD‐PerticucciS
23 Transcription Error
24
25 4/15/2005 Letter William Roy, M.D. 050415 Letter RoyW‐JadwinD+PerezL Slow
Pathology Processing Times
26
27
28


1
4/20/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 050420 Letter JadwinD‐
2 RoyW+PerezL+MartinM+KercherE+BryanP
Reply to RoyW Accusations of slow
3
4
5
6 4/21/2005 Internal David F. Jadwin 050421 Memo JadwinD‐HelveA+PerezL Clinical‐
memo Overcalled Cone Biopsies
7
8
9 5/1/2005 Policy Kern County Employee Handbook
10
11 5/9/2005 Internal Albert McBride, M.D. 050509 Memo McBrideA‐
12 memo JadwinD+PatelR+JohnsonR Letter of
Displeasure
13
14
5/10/2005 Policy KMC Peer Review Policy
15
16 5/18/2005 Certificate Edward Taylor, M.D., 27236 050518 TaylorE Leave
Linda Nipper
17 5/20/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050520‐1 Email JadwinD‐SmithT+BurrisM+
MartinezG+McConneheyD+WilliamsL PCC
18
19
20
21 5/20/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050520‐2 Email JadwinD‐
SmithT+BurrisM+MartinezG+McCOnneheyD+W
22 illiamsL AABB
23
24
25 5/24/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050524 Email JadwinD‐
HarrisI+KercherE+BarnesK+BryanP+WoodsR+S
26 mithT PCC & IT Plan Concerns
27
28


1
5/27/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050527 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Meeting with
2 BryanP
3
4 6/3/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050603‐2 Email JadwinD‐HarrisI IPR and
WoodsR
5
6 6/7/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050607‐2 Email JadwinD‐KercherE+BryanP
Abraham Slander of Pathology
7
8
9 6/8/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050608 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Meeting with
10 BryanP
11
12 6/21/2005 Contract Phillip Dutt, M.D., Peter 26251 050621 DuttP Contract
Bryan, Ray Watson, Kay
13 F. Madden, Karen
Barnes, Esq.
15 KercherE+HarrisI+BryanP FNA passed by MEC
16
17
6/28/2005 E‐mail Toni Smith, R.N. 050628 NEW Email SmithT‐
18 JadwinD+HarrisI+many PCC Audit
19
20 6/30/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 050630 Letter JadwinD‐
RoyW+MartinM+PerezL+HarrisI+KercherE+Brya
21
nP Defamation
22
23
24 7/1/2005 Presentation David F. Jadwin 051031‐1 Email JadwinD‐LindseyT PCC
Presentation 9‐05
25
26
27
28


1
7/15/2005 Letter William Roy, M.D. 050715 Letter RoyW‐
2 JadwinD+HarrisI+BryanP+PerezL Defamation
3
4
7/20/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050720 Email JadwinD‐HarrisI Defamation and
5 Peer Review
6
7 7/22/2005 Handwritten Irwin Harris 050723 NEW Notes HarrisI IPR & RoyW
8 notes
7/22/2005 Handwritten Savita P. Shertukde, 050722 ShertudkeA‐DFJ ‐ RoyW & HarrisI Send
9 notes M.D. Biopsy to USC
10
11 7/27/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 050727 NEW Letter JadwinD‐
12 HarrisI+PerezL+RoyW Roy IPR & USC Report
13
14
8/2/2005 E‐mail Peter Bryan 050802 Email JadwinD‐
15 BryanP+KercherE+HarrisI IPR Switched Chart
16
17
18 8/3/2005 Policy 050705 NEW Blood Product Policy
19 8/3/2005 Internal Frances Hardin 27081 050803 AbrahamJ Complaint

memo
20
21 8/7/2005 Internal Royce Johnson, M.D. 27080 050807 AbrahamJ Complaint
memo
22
23 8/22/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 050822 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Reschedule
BryanP Meeting
24
25
9/12/2005 Report Peter Bryan Report on FPB Compensation Policy
26
27
28


1
10/6/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051006 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Reschedule
2 BryanP Meeting
3
4 10/10/2005 Contract Phillip Dutt, M.D., 26194 051010 DuttP Contract Amend
Barbara Patrick, David
5 K. Culberson, Irwin
Harris, Kay F. Madden,
6
Karen Barnes, Esq.
7 10/10/2005 Internal Kern Medical Center 051010 NEW Memo KMC‐Board of Supervisors
memo Amendment to DuttP Contract
8
9
10 10/12/2005 Presentation David F. Jadwin 051012‐0 October Conference ‐ Presentation B
11
12 10/12/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051012‐1 Email JadwinD‐PerezL+HarrisI USC
13 Report & Concerns
14
15 10/12/2005 Internal Albert McBride, M.D. 051012‐7 Letter McBrideA‐HarrisI October
memo Conference Letter
16
17
10/12/2005 Report 051012‐9 NEW Oct Conf Feedback
18
19 10/12/2005 Report 051012‐8 NEW Oct Conf Feedback
20 10/12/2005 Presentation Nicole Sharkey 051012‐10 NEW October Conference ‐

Presentation A
21
22
10/12/2005 Internal Edward Taylor, M.D. 051012‐6 Memo TaylorE‐HarrisI October
23
24
25
10/12/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051012‐3 Email JadwinD‐BryanP+HillD+HarrisI
26 Placental Audit
27
28


1
10/12/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051012‐5 Email JadwinD‐JohnsonR Oct Conf
2
3
10/12/2005 E‐mail Ravindranath Patel, 051012‐4 Memo PatelR+JohnsonR+McBrideA‐
4 M.D., Royce Johnson, JadwinD+HarrisI October Conference Cancer
M.D., Albert McBride, Comm Displeasure
5 M.D.
6
7
8 10/13/2005 Internal William Roy, M.D. 051013‐1 Letter RoyW‐HarrisI October
9
10
10/13/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051013‐2 Letter JadwinD‐
11 HarrisI+AlkouriG+McBrideA+PerezL+MartinM+J
ohnsonR+KercherE+BryanP Oct Conf HarrisI
12
Behavior
13
14
15
16 10/14/2005 Internal Irwin Harris 051014 NEW Memo to File HarrisI Burst Into
memo Office
17
10/17/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051017‐2 Email JadwinD‐
18
BryanP+KercherE+PriceS Ang Biopsies
19 Discovered
20
21
10/17/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051017 NEW Email JadwinD‐
22
TaylorE+KercherE+McBrideA Oct Conf Apology
23 NEW
24
KercherE+BarnesK+BryanP Oct Conf
26
27
28


1
10/17/2005 Letter Eugene Kercher, M.D. 051017‐1 Letter
2 Alan Scott Ragland, KercherE+RaglandS+AbrahamJ+HarrisI‐JadwinD
M.D. Jennifer October Conference Reprimand
3 Abraham, M.D. Irwin
Harris
4
5
10/18/2005 E‐mail Alan Scott Ragland, 051018 NEW Email RaglandS‐HarrisI Oct Conf
6 M.D. Repor
7 10/19/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 051019‐3 Letter JadwinD‐

8 RaglandS+KercherE+BryanP October
Conference Apology
9
10
11 10/19/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 051019‐2 Letter JadwinD‐
12 McBrideA+KercherE+RaglandS+AbrahamJ+Harri
sI+JohnsonR+MartinM+PerezL+AlkouriG
13 October Conference Apology
14
15
16
17
10/19/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 051019‐1 Letter JadwinD‐
18
LauC+NaderiJ+KercherE+BryanP+KolbM
19 Apology for Tie Incident
20
21
10/20/2005 Internal Tracy Lindsey 051020‐2 Memo LindseyT‐JadwinD BarnesK
22 memo refusal to see JadwinD
23
24
10/20/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051020 Email JadwinD‐BarnesK Incredible
25 Mistake
26
10/20/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051020‐1 Email JadwinD‐KercherE Cancer
27 Comm Displeasure Memo
28


1
10/31/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051031‐2 Email JadwinD‐RamosA+KercherE
2 KercherE to Join BryanP meeting
3
4
11/1/2005 Contract Savita P. Shertukde, 26229 051101 ShertudkeS Contract
5 M.D., Peter Bryan, Ray
6 Watson, Kay F.
Madden, Karen Barnes,
7 Esq.
11/3/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 051103 Letter DFJ‐HarrisI Blood Usage Comm
8 reenergize
9
11/4/2005 E‐mail Bob Woods, Esq. 051104 Email WoodsR‐JadwinD IPR Switched
10 Charts
11
12 11/7/2005 E‐mail Arlene Ramos‐Aninion 051107‐2 Email RamosA‐JadwinD Meeting with
13 BryanP
14
15 11/8/2005 E‐mail Leonard Perez, M.D. 051108 Email LindseyT+PerezL+MorenoA‐
JadwinD RoyW Letter
16
17
11/8/2005 E‐mail Peter Bryan 051108 NEW Email BryanP‐HarrisI Behavior
18
19
11/9/2005 Report 051109‐2 Oncology Conference Feedback ‐ 8
20 min overrun
21
22 11/9/2005 Presentation David F. Jadwin 051109‐1 Oncology Conference Presentation ‐
8 min overrun
23
24
11/11/2005 E‐mail Peter Bryan 051111 Email BryanP‐JadwinD Oct Conf Letter
25
in File Concern
26
27
11/18/2005 Note Irwin Harris 051118 NEW Notes Roy Hysterectomy
28


1
11/21/2005 E‐mail Arlene Ramos‐Aninion 051121‐1 Email RamosA‐
2 JadwinD+KercherE+HarrisI+BarnardS+BryanP+H
ardinF+McDonaldR+RaglandS Mediation
3 Meeting
4
5
6
11/21/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051121‐3 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Out of Town
7
8
11/21/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051121‐2 Email JadwinD‐BarnesK+BryanP
9 Letters in File
10
11 11/28/2005 E‐mail Arlene Ramos‐Aninion 051128 Email JadwinD‐RamosA Out of Town for
12 CSP
13
14 11/29/2005 E‐mail Karen Barnes, Esq. 051129 Email BarnesK‐JadwinD+BryanP Letter
in File Concern
15
16
17 12/12/2005 Minutes Peter Bryan 9886 051212 JCC Minutes Outside Practices
18
19 12/12/2005 Letter Michael Young, Esq. 051212 Letter YoungM‐BarmannB+JadwinD
Request Meeting
20
21
12/12/2005 Policy Kern County Civil Service Commission Rules
22
23
12/14/2005 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 051214 Email JadwinD‐
24
LindseyT+McBrideA+MartinM Meeting re Oct
25 Conf
26
27
28


1
12/15/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin 051215‐3 Letter JadwinD‐
2 KercherE+BryanP+HarrisI+MartinM+McBrideA
Dec Conf
3
4
1/6/2006 Letter Karen Barnes, Esq. 060106 Letter BarnesK‐YoungM+BarmannB
5 Reply to YoungM Letter
6
7
8 1/9/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin 060109 Letter JadwinD‐BryanP Request for
Leave
9
10 1/11/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060111 Email JadwinD‐BryanP+BarnesK No
Show at Mediation
11
12
13 1/11/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060111 NEW Email JadwinD‐BryanP BarnesK
Letter Protest
14
15
16 1/13/2006 Certificate Paul Riskin, M.D. 060113 Cert1
1/13/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin 051216 Note DFJ‐BryanP Roy Baggage
17
18
1/17/2006 Internal Peter Bryan 060117 NEW Memo BryanP‐
19 memo RubioM+BarmannB+BarnesK+ErreaR Behavior
20
21
1/18/2006 E‐mail Lisa Landvogt 060118‐2 Email LandvogtL‐JadwinD IPR & Oct
22
Conf
23
24
QuinonezB+BryanP+HarrisI+McBrideA ACS CoC
25 on IPR
26
27
28


1
1/19/2006 E‐mail Tracy Lindsey 060119 NEW Email LindseyT‐
2 BarnesK+BryanP+HarrisI+RamosA+SubriarT+Val
enciaC+WeddingC LT Coverage
3
4
5
6 2/2/2006 E‐mail Bonnie Quinonez 060202 Email JadwinD‐QuinonezB Onoclogy
Conference compliance
7
8
9
10 2/9/2006 E‐mail Arlene Ramos‐Aninion 060209‐2 Email RamosA‐JadwinD+LindseyT
Meeting with BarmannB
11
12
13 2/10/2006 Note Irwin Harris 060210 NEW Letter JadwinD‐RoyW Defamation
+ HarrisI Note
14
15
16 2/10/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin 060210 Letter JadwinD‐RoyW Defamation
17
2/13/2006 Minutes Peter Bryan 9842 060213 JCC Minutes Outside Practices
18
19
2/13/2006 Printout David F. Jadwin 060213 NEW Printout Accredited Program
20
Search
21
22
2/21/2006 Internal Peter Bryan 060221‐1 Memo BryanP‐JadwinD+RamosA Roy
23 memo Dispute
24
25 2/22/2006 Letter William Roy, M.D. 060222 NEW Letter RoyW‐HarrisI Peer Review
26
27
28


1
2/22/2006 E‐mail Peter Bryan 060223 NEW Email RaglandS‐BryanP Staff
2 Officer Mediation
3
4 2/22/2006 E‐mail Dianne McConnehey, 060222 Email McConneheyD‐JadwinD+HarrisI
R.N. Peer Review of JadwinD
5
6
7 2/23/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060223 Email JadwinD‐BryanP Staff Officer
8 Mediation
9
10 3/2/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060302‐2 Email JadwinD‐BryanP LT Coverage
11
BryanP+WoodsR+BarnesK Ang Biopsies
13
14
15 3/2/2006 Certificate Sandra Chester 060302‐1 ChesterS‐JadwinD Medical Leave
Designation
16
17 3/2/2006 Form David F. Jadwin 060302‐0 Leave Request 1
18
3/8/2006 E‐mail Peter Bryan 060308 Email BryanP‐JadwinD Placental Audit
19 Results
20
21 3/15/2006 Report Debra Hamm 060315 Report HammD‐HillD‐JadwinD ‐
Placental Audit
22
23
3/15/2006 Letter Juan Felix, MD 060315 NEW Letter FelixJ‐JadwinD RoyW
24
Hysterectomy
25
26
27
28


1
3/16/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060316‐2 Email JadwinD‐KercherE+BryanP Roy
2 Defamation & Leave Extension
3
4
5 Bryan+ChesterS+DuttP Leave Extension
6
7
8 3/23/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060323‐2 Email JadwinD‐BryanP+KercherE
Placental Audit Results
9
10
11 3/23/2006 Internal David F. Jadwin 060323‐1 57 Memos JadwinD‐SmithT PCC
12 memo Errors
13 3/30/2006 Letter Michael Young, Esq. 060330 Letter YoungM‐RoyW+JadwinD

Defamation
14
15
16 4/5/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060405 Email JadwinD‐BryanP Locum Tenens &
Sick Mother & Surgery
17
18
19 4/6/2006 Letter William Roy, M.D. 060406 NEW Letter RoyW‐
BryanP+HarrisI+PerezL Defamation Atty Letter
20
21
22
4/10/2006 Printout David F. Jadwin 060410‐3 Lab Evaluations of JadwinD
23
24
4/10/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 060410‐1 Email JadwinD‐BryanP Meeting
25 Agenda & PCC & Ang Biopsies & Roy & Sick
Leave
26
27
28


1
4/14/2006 Note David F. Jadwin 060413‐2 JadwinD Notes Meeting with BryanP
2 & PCC
3
4 KercherE+BryanP+HarrisI Lau Confrontation
5
6
4/17/2006 Internal Toni Smith, R.N. 060417 NEW Memo SmithT‐BryanP 57 PCC
7 memo Memos
8
4/17/2006 Internal Savita P. Shertukde, 060417‐0 Statement of ShertudkeA LauC
9 memo M.D. Confrontation
10
11 4/17/2006 E‐mail Peter Bryan 060417‐3 Email JadwinD‐
12 BryanP+KercherE+BarnesK+HarrisI PCC &
Request BarmannB Meeting
13
14
15 4/17/2006 Internal David F. Jadwin 060417‐2 Memo JadwinD‐HarrisI LauC
memo Confrontation
16
17 4/17/2006 Internal Peter Bryan 060417‐4 Memo BryanP‐JadwinD+BarnesK
memo Ultimatum 1
18
19
20 4/20/2006 Letter Sandra Chester 060420 Letter ChesterS‐JadwinD+BryanP End of
Sick Leave Notice
21
22
23 4/21/2006 E‐mail Peter Bryan 060421‐3 Email BryanP‐JadwinD+HarrisI Ang
Biopsies
24
25
4/26/2006 Certificate Paul Riskin, M.D. 060426‐2 Cert2
26
4/26/2006 Form David F. Jadwin 060426 Leave Request 2
27
28


1
4/28/2006 Internal Peter Bryan 060428 Memo BryanP‐
2 memo JadwinD+BarnesK+ChesterS Ultimatum 2
3
4
4/28/2006 Handwritten Irwin Harris 060428 NEW Notes HarrisI Ang Biopsies
5 notes
6
5/4/2006 Contract William Colburn, MD, 26379 060504 ColburnW Contract
7 Bernie Barmann, Esq.
8 5/10/2006 Internal Irwin Harris 27083 060510 MansourJ Behavior
memo
9 5/25/2006 Letter Irwin Harris Eugene 060206 NEW Draft HarrisI+KercherE+RaglandS‐
10 Kercher, M.D. Alan JadwinD Behavior
Scott Ragland, M.D.
11
12 5/31/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin 060531 Letter JadwinD‐BryanP Deadline
Extension Request
13
14
6/6/2006 Internal Irwin Harris 27085 060606 MansourJ Behavior
15 memo
memo
17 6/12/2006 Minutes Peter Bryan 9829 060612 JCC Minutes Removal
18
6/14/2006 E‐mail Peter Bryan 060614‐1 Email BryanP‐JadwinD Ultimatum 3
19 Email
20
6/14/2006 Letter Peter Bryan 060614‐2 Letter BryanP‐
21 JadwinD+HarrisI+KercherE+BarnesK Ultimatum
3
22
23
6/14/2006 Internal 060616 NEW Memo to File Strategy
24
memo
25 6/21/2006 Personnel Alan Scott Ragland, 060621 Credentials File
File M.D.
26
27
28


1
6/26/2006 Letter Peter Bryan Renita 060626‐1 Email NunnR‐
2 Nunn JadwinD+RaisonM+BarnesK+BryanP+ChesterS+
HarrisI+RobertsK Lockout
3
4
5
6/29/2006 Eugene D. Lee, Esq. 060629 Fax LeeE‐BarnesK+JadwinD No
6 Spoliation & Demand Letter
7
8 7/1/2006 Report 21121 060701 Exceptional Events Log
9
10 7/10/2006 Handwritten Irwin Harris; Peter 060710 NEW Notes HarrisI Demotion
notes Bryan
11 7/10/2006 Minutes Peter Bryan, Rae 060710 NEW Minutes JCC Demotion of JadwinD
12 McDonald
13
14 7/10/2006 Internal Peter Bryan 060710 NEW Memo BryanP‐JCC Demotion
memo
15
16 7/10/2006 Minutes Peter Bryan 9819 JCC Minutes Removal
17 7/14/2006 Letter Eugene D. Lee, Esq. 060714 Fax LeeE‐BarnesK+JadwinD Followup

Demand Letter
18
19
20 7/18/2006 Personnel Karen Barnes, Esq. Personnel File ‐ County_060726
File
21 7/18/2006 Letter Karen Barnes, Esq. 060718 Letter BarnesK‐
LeeE+BryanP+BarmannB Reply to Demand
22
Letter
23
24
7/25/2006 Letter Peter Bryan Sandra 060725 NEW Letter BryanP‐DHS Demotion
25 Chester
26
8/17/2006 Personnel 060817 NEW Personnel File
27 File
8/23/2006 Internal Rae McDonald 27093 060823 MansourJ Behavior
28
memo


1
8/30/2006 Letter William Colburn, MD 25924 060830 ColburnW Report
2
9/1/2006 Letter Irwin Harris 060901 Letter HarrisI‐JadwinD Return to Work
3
4
9/11/2006 Certificate Paul Riskin, M.D. 060912‐2 Letter JadwinD‐HarrisI Return to
5 Work
6
7 memo
8 9/14/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 060914 NEW Email BarnesK‐
DuttP+HarrisI+McDonaldR Amendments to
9 Contract
10
11
12 9/15/2006 E‐mail Karen Barnes, Esq. 060915 Email Barnes‐LeeE ‐ Amendment 1 to
Contract
13
14
9/18/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin 060919 Letter JadwinD‐BarnesK Paycut Protest
15
16
9/20/2006 Letter David K. Culberson 060920 Letter Culberson‐
17 JadwinD+HarrisI+BarnesK Pay Cut Reply
18
19
20 10/3/2006 Contract Barbara Patrick David 061003 Amendment 1 to Contract2
K. Culberson Irwin
21 Harris barnes Kay F.
Madden David F.
22 Jadwin
10/3/2006 E‐mail Karen Barnes, Esq. 061003 NEW Email BarnesK‐EpsteinJ Peer
23
Review
24
10/3/2006 Minutes Board of Supervisors 061002 Bd of Super approve paycut
25
26 10/4/2006 Contract Jonathan I. Epstein, 26375 061004 EpsteinJ Contract
M.D., Bernie Barmann,
27 Esq.
memo


1
10/10/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 061010 Email JadwinD‐PriceS ‐ Placental
2 Review
3
4 memo
10/17/2006 Minutes Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061107 NEW Minutes Pathology Dept ‐ Sharps
5
6
7 memo
8 10/25/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 061025 Email JadwinD‐DuttP+Shertudke
Interesting Quote
9
10
10/30/2006 Letter Bernie Barmann, Esq., 0017371 061030 Letter BarnesK‐EpsteinJ
11 Karen Barnes, Esq. Prostatectomy
12
13 11/6/2006 E‐mail Evangeline Gallegos‐ 061106 NEW Email GallegosE‐DuttP Behavior
14 Tolentino
15 11/13/2006 Form David F. Jadwin 061113 NEW Peer Review Form JadwinD S06‐

16 4131
17 11/13/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 061113‐3 Email JadwinD‐HarrisI‐MartinM‐

McBrideA+PriceS ‐ Prostatectomy
18
19
20
11/14/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061114‐1 Email DuttP‐JadwinD Vangie Absence
21
22
11/16/2006 Form Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061116 NEW Peer Review Form S06‐5229
23
24
11/17/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061117 Email ‐ DuttP‐JadwinD‐ harassing
25
26
11/18/2006 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061118 NEW Letter DuttP‐EpsteinJ S06‐4131
27
28


1
2 memo
11/22/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061122‐1 Email ‐ DuttP‐JadwinD FNA Privileges
3
4
11/22/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061122‐3 NEW Email ‐ DuttP‐JadwinD
5 Christmas Holiday
6
7
11/22/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061122‐2 Email ‐ DuttP‐JadwinD Missed Rush
8 Case
9 11/27/2006 E‐mail Evangeline Gallegos‐ 061127 NEW Email GallegosE‐DuttP Dumping

10 Tolentino Tissues
11 11/28/2006 E‐mail Jonathan I. Epstein, 061128 NEW Email EpsteinJ‐DuttP S06‐4131

12 M.D.
13 11/29/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061129‐2 Email ‐ JadwinD‐DuttP ‐ Handling of

14 Case
15 11/29/2006 E‐mail Joint Commission on 061129‐1 Email JCAHO‐JadwinD Blowing

16 Accreditation of Whistle
Healthcare
17 Organizations
11/30/2006 Letter Jonathan I. Epstein, 0017375 061130 Epstein Findings ‐
18 M.D. Prostatectomy
19
11/30/2006 Report 070118 NEW Pathology Report S06‐4131
20
21
12/1/2006 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061201 NEW Letter DuttP‐HackerC S06‐4131
22
23
12/1/2006 Letter Department of Health 061201 Letter DHS‐JadwinD Blowing Whistle
24 Services
25
12/1/2006 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061201 NEW Letter DuttP‐EpsteinJ Peer Review
26
27
12/4/2006 Handwritten Irwin Harris 061204 NEW Notes HarrisI Behavior
28 notes


1
12/4/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061204 NEW Email DuttP‐JadwinD Sharps‐
2 Rushing‐Criticism‐Etc
3
4 12/5/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 061205‐3 Email JadwinD‐DuttP+FokR+PriceS
Missed Occult Lesion
5
6
7 12/5/2006 E‐mail Tom Wheeler, M.D. 061205‐1 Email JadwinD‐WheelerT Radical
8 Prostetectomy
9
10 12/5/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061205‐6 Email JadwinD‐DuttP Sharps &
Criticisms
11
PerezL+DuttP+FokR+PriceS Missed
13 Chorangioma
14
15 12/6/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061206‐1 Email DuttP‐JadwinD Cutting Policy
16
17 12/6/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061205‐4 Email DuttP‐JadwinD Radical
Prostetectomy & Peer Review
18
19
20
12/06/06 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 061206‐2 Email JadwinD‐DuttP Radical
21 10:49 a.m. Prostetectomy
22
23 12/06/06 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061206‐3 Email JadwinD‐DuttP Peer Review
11:36 a.m. Forms
24
25 12/06/06 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061206‐4 Email DuttP‐JadwinD Radical
12:13 p.m. Prostetectomy
26
27
28


1
2 12:54 p.m. DuttP+BarnesK+CulbersonD+HarrisI Blowing
Whistle to Board of Supervisors
3
4
5
6 12/06/06 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061206 NEW Email DuttP‐CulbersonD Behavior
12:58 p.m.
7
8 12/7/2006 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061207 NEW Email DuttP‐JadwinD Vangie
9
10 12/7/2006 Letter David K. Culberson 061207‐2 Letter ‐ CulbersonD‐
JadwinD+HarrisI+RaisonM+BarnesK ‐ House
11 Arrest
12
13 12/07/06 9:05 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061207 NEW Email DuttP‐FigueroaY Sharps
a.m.
14
15 12/07/06 9:17 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 061207‐1 Email Sharps
a.m.
16
12/11/2006 Minutes Arlene Ramos‐Aninion, 10014 061211 Due Process
17 David K. Culberson
18 12/13/2006 Declaration Albert McBride, M.D. 061213 NEW Declaration McBrideA Peer
Review
19
20
12/13/2006 Letter Juan Felix, MD 061213 NEW Letter FelixJ‐DuttP Peer Review
21
22
12/13/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin 061213‐2 Letter ‐ JadwinD‐CulbersonD+ALL
23 Blowing Whistle
24
25 12/14/2006 Internal Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061214 NEW Memo DuttP‐PeerReviewComm
memo Peer Review
26
27
28


1
12/14/2006 Policy KMC Medical Staff Rules and Regulations
2
3
12/14/2006 Internal Phillip Dutt, M.D. 26503 061214 DuttP Peer Review Complaint
4 memo
5
12/18/2006 E‐mail David F. Jadwin 061218‐1 Email ‐ JadwinD‐DuttP WSJ Article ‐
6 FNA & PCC & IPR
7
8 12/26/2006 Letter Parakrama 26887 061226 ChandrasomaP Report
Chandrasoma, M.D.
9
10 12/26/06 2:42 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 061206‐6 NEW Email DuttP‐HarrisI Peer Review
p.m.
11
12 1/4/2007 E‐mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. 070104 NEW Email DuttP‐CulbersonD CAP
Investigation
13
14 1/8/2007 Internal Phillip Dutt, M.D. 070101 NEW Memo DuttP Behavior & Peer
memo Review & CAP
15
16 1/8/2007 Policy Corrective Action and Termination Review
Process
17
18 1/11/2007 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. 070111 NEW Letter DuttP‐CAP Tissue Bank
19
20 1/23/2007 Internal Phillip Dutt, M.D. 11190 070123 CAP
memo
21 1/31/2007 Letter Cindy Lighthill 070131 Professional Fees
22
2/1/2007 Policy UMPK Bylaws
23 2/6/2007 Internal Irwin Harris 27100 070206 DuttP Complaint
memo
24
25 memo
26 4/4/2007 Letter Eugene D. Lee, Esq. 070404 Letter LeeE‐BarnesK ‐ Involuntary Leave

Protest
27
28


1
2 memo
3 memo
memo
5
4/24/2007 Printout 070424 NEW JadwinD Compensation
6 Comparison
7
8 4/30/2007 Letter Mark Wasser, Esq. 070430 Letter WasserM‐LeeE ‐ Lifting of Leave
Restrictions
9
10
5/1/2007 E‐mail Mark Wasser, Esq. 070501 Emails WasserM‐LeeE ‐ Buyout
11
12
5/1/2007 Letter Eugene D. Lee, Esq. 070501 Letter LeeE‐WasserM ‐ Non‐Renewal of
13 Contract
14
15 6/19/2007 Contract Gian A. Yakoub, 26175 070619 YakoubG Contract
16 MabenD, Paul Hensler,
EspinosaL, Karen
17 Barnes, Esq.
7/3/2007 Minutes Alan Scott Ragland, 7885 070703 MEC Minutes DiggesJ Resign
18 M.D.
19
9/10/2007 Minutes Arlene Ramos‐Aninion, 9919 070910 JCC Minutes Due Process
20 Alan Scott Ragland,
M.D.
21
12/10/2007 Minutes Alan Scott Ragland, 21161 071210 JCC Minutes ‐ DuttP not chair
22 M.D.
23
1/14/2008 Minutes Alan Scott Ragland, 21159 080114 JCC Minutes ‐ MansourJ
24 M.D. behavior
25
7/22/2008 Letter Linda Wilkinson, DHS Re Complaint CA0099921
26
27
7/22/2008 Report Linda Wilkinson, DHS Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of
28 Correction


1
8/16/2008 Printout Eugene D. Lee, Esq. 080816 Authentication Stip
2
3
4 XII. DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS
1. Plaintiff intends to introduce the depositions taken in this action, and attached exhibits,
5
for all purposes allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence. Plaintiff also intends
6
to introduce all sets and supplemental sets of interrogatories, requests for admissions and request for
7
documents propounded to and responded by defendants.
8
9 XIII. FURTHER DISCOVERY OR MOTIONS
On 12/23/08, Plaintiff requested Defendant to supplement responses to all written discovery
10
requests pursuant to FRCP Rule 26(e), but Defendant refused.
11
Rule 26(e) provides that a party who has complied with early disclosure requirements or who has
12
responded to discovery demands from opposing parties is under a duty to supplement or correct the
13
disclosure or discovery response to include information later acquired. The duty to supplement or
14
correct prior disclosures or discovery responses arises “if the party learns that in some material respect
15
the disclosure or response is incomplete or incorrect.” This duty applies whether the new information is
16
obtained by the client or the attorney. It applies both to early disclosures mandated under Rule 26(a) and
17
to responses to formal discovery requests (interrogatories, requests for production and requests for
18
admission. See FRCP 26(e)(1)(A). The duty to supplement or correct earlier discovery responses
19
continues even after the close of scheduled discovery. (See Adv. Comm. Notes on 1993 Amendments to
20
FRCP 26(e)—”Supplementations ... should be made ... with special promptness as the trial date
21
approaches”).
22
Plaintiff requests the Court’s assistance in ensuring Defendant complies with its duties under
23
Rule 26(e).
24
25 XIV. STIPULATIONS
None.
26
27 XV. AMENDMENTS - DISMISSALS
None.
28
XVI. SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS
1 Plaintiff has always welcomed settlement discussions and believes negotiations between parties
2 and/or a court settlement conference under L.R. 16-270 may be helpful.
3 XVII. AGREED STATEMENTS
4 Plaintiff believes that a presentation of all or part of the action upon an Agreed Statement of
5 Facts is feasible and advisable.
6 XVIII. SEPARATE TRIAL OF ISSUES
7 Plaintiff does not believe separate trial of any of the issues is feasible or advisable.
8 XIX. IMPARTIAL EXPERTS - LIMITATION OF EXPERTS
9 Plaintiff does not believe appointment by the Court of impartial expert witnesses or limitation of
10 the number of expert witnesses is advisable.
11 XX. ATTORNEYS’ FEES
12 If Plaintiff prevails, Plaintiff will seek costs and attorneys’ fees pursuant to Section 2699 of the
13 Labor Code for violation of Section 1102.5 of the Labor Code, 1278.5(g) of the Health & Safety Code,
14 Section 1021.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 12965 of the Government Code, 29 U.S.C. §
15 2617(a)(3) [FMLA], and 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Plaintiff intends to make such a motion for award of
16 attorney fees within 30 days after entry of final judgment pursuant to Local Rule 54-293.
17 XXI. TRIAL EXHIBITS
18 None.
19 XXII. MISCELLANEOUS
20 Plaintiff seeks clarification of what the Fifth Affirmative Defenses is. In ruling on the parties
21 cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court noted Defendants had abandoned the affirmative
22 defenses:
23 Plaintiff seeks summary judgment as to certain of Defendants’ affirmative defenses
enumerated below. Defendants provided no briefing in support of any of their
24 affirmative defenses. At oral argument on the motion, Defendants’ counsel stated that
the affirmative defenses were not “at issue.” From the lack of briefing and the not “at
25 issue” statement, it appears Defendants have abandoned their affirmative defenses.
26 The Court nevertheless concluded that
27 [the Fifth Affirmative Defense] can be fairly read as pleading the affirmative defenses of
unclean hands and/or equitable estoppel, albeit without those discrete labels. . . . Plaintiff
28 has not met his burden at the summary judgment stage and summary judgment on this
affirmative defense is DENIED.
1 There does not appear to be any actual adjudication by the Court as to what the Fifth Affirmative
2 Defense stands for. Plaintiff remains at a loss as to what it is, making preparation for trial and for
3 rebuttal of this defense exceedingly difficult, particularly given that discovery closed long ago in this
4 action. As the Court earlier acknowledged at the hearing on motions for summary judgment, the defense
5 is far from clear:
6 [. . .] and then as far as I understand, what I would call the fifth defense, is what I would
characterize as a justification type of defense, which is to say that it is the plaintiff’s
7 conduct that caused the problems and the leaves, suspensions and ultimate expiration of
the contract and there is again somewhat of a lack of clarity about the nature and extent
8 of that.
9 Plaintiff renews his request for adjudication of what the Fifth Affirmative Defense is.
10 Plaintiff also renews his request for a jury instruction or other sanction regarding the undisputed
11 spoliation of evidence committed by Dr. Scott Ragland, Mr. David Culberson and Supervisor Barbara
12 Patrick. Defendants’ reply brief (Doc. 291) did not challenge that the spoliation had occurred, but
13 merely made speculative, unsupported, conclusory assertions that the spoliated evidence was non-
14 material.
15
16 Plaintiff requests permission to use a written questionnaire in voir dire and half a day to review
17 responses.
18
19 On August 15, 2008, the parties stipulated that the documents identified in the attached Exhibit
20 A were deemed to be authenticated under the FRE.
21
22 Plaintiff believes a stipulation as to authenticity and admissibility of other documents to be
23 presented at trial would be advisable.
24
25 Plaintiff reserves the right to amend any aspect of this pretrial order in the interest of justice.
26 XXIII. CLAIMS OF PRIVILEGE.
27 Plaintiff asserts no privilege against disclosure as to any statement required in this statement.
28

1 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on March 9, 2009.

2
/s/ Eugene D. Lee
3 LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE LEE
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3100
4 Los Angeles, CA 90013
Phone: (213) 992-3299
5 Fax: (213) 596-0487
email: elee@LOEL.com
6 Attorney for Plaintiff DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

EXHIBIT A
Jadwin-KC
Documents
Authored by:
Eugene D. Lee
Law Office of Eugene Lee
Friday, August 15, 2008

Documents 8/15/2008 4:55 PM
Filter: Stip = Yes (216 of 313)
Stip Bates - ... Bates - ... Date Type + Author(s) Recipient(s)
ü DFJ00578 DFJ00578 Wed 10/12/2005 E-mail Ravindranath Patel, M.D., Royce David F. Jadwin, D.O.
Johnson, M.D., Albert McBride,
M.D.
ü DFJ00579 DFJ00579 Wed 10/12/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Royce Johnson, M.D.
ü DFJ00580 DFJ00580 Wed 10/12/2005 Internal memo Edward Taylor, M.D. Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00581 DFJ00581 Wed 10/12/2005 Internal memo Albert McBride, M.D. Irwin Harris
ü 0000512 0000548 Wed 10/12/2005 Report
ü 0000096 0000096 Wed 10/12/2005 Report
ü 0000563 0000571 Wed 10/12/2005 Presentation Nicole Sharkey Kern Medical Center
ü DFJ00583 DFJ00583 Thu 10/13/2005 Internal memo William Roy, M.D. Irwin Harris
ü 0000095 0000096 Fri 10/14/2005 Internal memo Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00588 DFJ00588 Mon 10/17/2005 Letter Eugene Kercher, M.D. Alan Scott David F. Jadwin, D.O.
Ragland, M.D. Jennifer Abraham,
M.D. Irwin Harris
ü 0000094 0000094 Tue 10/18/2005 E-mail Alan Scott Ragland, M.D. Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00590 DFJ00590 Wed 10/19/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin, D.O. Chester Lau
ü DFJ00299 DFJ00301 Thu 12/09/2004 E-mail Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000101 0000110 Tue 01/06/2004 Minutes Medical Executive Conference
ü DFJ00094 DFJ00100 Thu 11/02/2000 Personnel File McCordR
ü Wed 01/19/2005 Policy
ü DFJ00175 DFJ00177 Tue 11/12/2002 Minutes Board of Supervisors
ü Wed 06/06/2001 Policy
ü 0000804 0000804 To Be Determined Internal memo Ravindranath Patel, M.D., Albert Resident presenter
McBride, M.D., Bonnie Quinonez
ü 0000031 0000070 Tue 10/21/2003 Internal memo Michael Ewald Marvin Kolb
Confidential Attorney Work Product. Do Not Reproduce. LeeE

Page 2 of 12
ü DFJ00248 DFJ00248 Wed 01/21/2004 Internal memo Alan Scott Ragland, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0011529 0011620 Mon 12/13/2004 Policy
ü DFJ00246 DFJ00246 Wed 11/26/2003 Letter Marvin Kolb David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00296 DFJ00296 Mon 11/01/2004 Internal memo Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000579 0000633 Thu 01/01/2004 Reference ACS CoC
ü 0000261 0000261 Mon 10/06/2003 E-mail Marvin Kolb Eugene Kercher, M.D., Jennifer
Abraham, M.D.
ü 0000686 0000765 Fri 03/08/2002 Internal memo Peter Bryan Navin Amin, M.D., Royce Johnson,
M.D., Marvin Kolb, Jose Perez,
M.D., James Sproul, M.D.
ü DFJ00251 DFJ00270 Mon 05/03/2004 Report David Lieu, M.D.
ü Sun 05/01/2005 Policy
ü 0000619 0000622 Mon 10/29/2001 Letter ACS Peter Bryan
ü Mon 01/08/2007 Policy
ü DFJ00141 DFJ00149 Thu 10/31/2002 Personnel File David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00025 DFJ00046 Tue 10/24/2000 Contract David F. Jadwin, D.O., Kay F.
Madden, Bernie Barmann, Esq.,
Peter Bryan, petersonk
ü DFJ00319 DFJ00320 Wed 02/02/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Peter Bryan
ü DFJ00241 DFJ00242 Thu 11/20/2003 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Alan Scott Ragland, M.D.
ü Mon 12/12/2005 Policy
ü 0000767 0000773 Thu 04/25/2002 Letter David F. Jadwin, D.O. Peter Bryan
ü Thu 02/01/2007 Policy
ü Tue 04/06/2004 Policy
ü 0001073 0001131 Mon 11/18/2002 Internal memo Maureen Martin, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.

Page 3 of 12
ü DFJ00317 DFJ00317 Tue 02/01/2005 E-mail Eugene Kercher, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O., Peter Bryan
ü DFJ00001 DFJ00001 To Be Determined E-mail Toni Smith, R.N. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00247 DFJ00247 Fri 12/26/2003 Printout SmithAr
ü DFJ00353 DFJ00354 Fri 02/25/2005 E-mail Alan Scott Ragland, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00363 DFJ00363 Fri 04/15/2005 Letter William Roy, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00367 DFJ00367 Thu 04/21/2005 Internal memo David F. Jadwin, D.O. Alice Hevle
ü DFJ00381 DFJ00381 Mon 05/09/2005 Internal memo Albert McBride, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00411 DFJ00412 Tue 05/24/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Irwin Harris
ü 0000421 0000422 Tue 06/28/2005 E-mail Toni Smith, R.N. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00437 DFJ00437 Thu 06/30/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin, D.O. William Roy, M.D.
ü 0000359 0000377 Wed 08/03/2005 Policy
ü DFJ00439 DFJ00439 Fri 07/15/2005 Letter William Roy, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00441 DFJ00441 Wed 07/20/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00442 DFJ00442 Fri 07/22/2005 Handwritten Savita P. Shertukde, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
notes
ü DFJ00361 DFJ00361 Wed 03/02/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Arlene Ramos-Aninion
ü DFJ00444 DFJ00444 Tue 08/02/2005 E-mail Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0001380 0001380 Mon 10/10/2005 Internal memo Kern Medical Center Board of Supervisors
ü DFJ00595 DFJ00595 Thu 10/20/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Eugene Kercher, M.D.
ü DFJ00596 DFJ00596 Thu 10/20/2005 Internal memo Tracy Lindsey David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00593 DFJ00593 Thu 10/20/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Karen Barnes, Esq.
ü DFJ00598 DFJ00649 Fri 07/01/2005 Presentation David F. Jadwin, D.O. Kern Medical Center
ü DFJ00651 DFJ00651 Fri 11/04/2005 E-mail Bob Woods, Esq. David F. Jadwin, D.O.

Page 4 of 12
ü DFJ00653 DFJ00653 Mon 11/07/2005 E-mail Arlene Ramos-Aninion David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00654 DFJ00654 Tue 11/08/2005 E-mail Leonard Perez, M.D. Ana Moreno
ü 0000503 0000503 Tue 11/08/2005 E-mail Peter Bryan Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00655 DFJ00658 Wed 11/09/2005 Presentation David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00659 DFJ00689 Wed 11/09/2005 Report
ü DFJ00690 DFJ00690 Fri 11/11/2005 E-mail Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00693 DFJ00693 Mon 11/21/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Karen Barnes, Esq.
ü DFJ00695 DFJ00695 Mon 11/28/2005 E-mail Arlene Ramos-Aninion David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00696 DFJ00696 Tue 11/29/2005 E-mail Karen Barnes, Esq. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00698 DFJ00699 Mon 12/12/2005 Letter Michael Young, Esq. Bernie Barmann, Esq.
ü DFJ00700 DFJ00700 Wed 12/14/2005 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Tracy Lindsey
ü DFJ00705 DFJ00707 Thu 12/15/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin, D.O. Eugene Kercher, M.D.
ü 0001612 0001613 Thu 11/03/2005 Letter David F. Jadwin, D.O. Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00713 DFJ00722 Fri 01/06/2006 Letter Karen Barnes, Esq. Michael Young, Esq.
ü DFJ01345 DFJ01346 Mon 06/26/2006 Letter Peter Bryan Renita Nunn David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0001476 0001565 Mon 07/10/2006 Internal memo Peter Bryan Joint Conference Committee
ü 0000074 0000076 Mon 07/10/2006 Minutes Rae McDonald
ü DFJ01359 DFJ01361 Tue 07/18/2006 Letter Karen Barnes, Esq. Eugene D. Lee, Esq.
ü 0001619 0001619 Tue 07/25/2006 Letter Peter Bryan Sandra Chester Department of Health Services
ü DFJ01383 DFJ01383 Fri 09/01/2006 Letter Irwin Harris David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000830 0000830 Thu 09/14/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. Karen Barnes, Esq.
ü DFJ01390 DFJ01395 Fri 09/15/2006 E-mail Karen Barnes, Esq. Eugene D. Lee, Esq.

Page 5 of 12
ü DFJ01398 DFJ01398 Wed 09/20/2006 Letter David K. Culberson David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01407 DFJ01414 Tue 10/03/2006 Minutes Board of Supervisors
ü 0017355 0017370 Wed 03/15/2006 Report Debra Hamm David Hill, David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0001566 0001567 Tue 01/17/2006 Internal memo Peter Bryan Michael Rubio
ü DFJ00727 DFJ00727 Wed 01/18/2006 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Bonnie Quinonez
ü DFJ00728 DFJ00728 Wed 01/18/2006 E-mail Lisa Landvogt David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0001312 0001313 Thu 01/19/2006 E-mail Tracy Lindsey Karen Barnes, Esq. Peter Bryan
Irwin Harris Arlene Ramos-Aninion
Tracy Subriar Carol Wedding
ü DFJ00729 DFJ00730 Thu 02/02/2006 E-mail Bonnie Quinonez David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000426 0000427 Thu 05/25/2006 Letter Irwin Harris Eugene Kercher, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
Alan Scott Ragland, M.D.
ü DFJ00737 DFJ00737 Thu 02/09/2006 E-mail Arlene Ramos-Aninion David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00738 DFJ00738 Fri 02/10/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin, D.O. William Roy, M.D.
ü 0000431 0000432 Fri 02/10/2006 Note Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00740 DFJ00741 Tue 02/21/2006 Internal memo Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00743 DFJ00743 Wed 02/22/2006 E-mail Dianne McConnehey, R.N. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000434 0000476 Wed 02/22/2006 Letter William Roy, M.D. Irwin Harris
ü 0000507 0000507 Wed 02/22/2006 E-mail Peter Bryan Alan Scott Ragland, M.D.
ü 0027377 0027377 Mon 02/04/2002 Internal memo Leonard Perez, M.D. Marvin Kolb
ü 0027376 0027376 Tue 03/19/2002 Letter DicksonK Marvin Kolb
ü 0027302 0027313 Wed 06/26/2002 Internal memo Michael Ewald AdamsL
ü 0027271 0027271 Thu 04/18/2002 E-mail Peter Bryan Marvin Kolb
ü 0027242 0027242 Mon 05/05/1997 Internal memo Edward Taylor, M.D. FinneganJ
ü 0027240 0027240 Thu 04/17/1997 Internal memo FinneganJ Harrihar Pershadsingh, M.D.

Page 6 of 12
ü 0027236 0027236 Wed 05/18/2005 Certificate Edward Taylor, M.D., Linda Nipper
ü 0027112 0027113 Sat 06/16/2001 Internal memo Ana Moreno Leonard Perez, M.D.
ü 0027109 0027109 Thu 04/12/2007 Internal memo Irwin Harris
ü 0027102 0027104 Mon 03/12/2007 Internal memo Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00747 DFJ00748 Thu 03/02/2006 Certificate Sandra Chester David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00751 DFJ00751 Wed 03/08/2006 E-mail Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00781 DFJ00782 Thu 03/30/2006 Letter Michael Young, Esq. William Roy, M.D.
ü 0000477 0000477 Thu 04/06/2006 Letter William Roy, M.D. Peter Bryan Irwin Harris
ü DFJ00789 DFJ00789 Mon 04/17/2006 Internal memo Savita P. Shertukde, M.D.
ü DFJ00793 DFJ00793 Mon 04/17/2006 E-mail Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00794 DFJ00795 Mon 04/17/2006 Internal memo Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000401 0000403 Mon 04/17/2006 Internal memo Toni Smith, R.N. Peter Bryan
ü DFJ00796 DFJ00796 Thu 04/20/2006 Letter Sandra Chester David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ00799 DFJ00799 Fri 04/21/2006 E-mail Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01153 DFJ01168 Fri 04/28/2006 Internal memo Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01179 DFJ01180 Wed 06/14/2006 E-mail Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01181 DFJ01181 Wed 06/14/2006 Letter Peter Bryan David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01416 DFJ01421 Tue 10/03/2006 Contract Barbara Patrick David K.
Culberson Irwin Harris barnes Kay
F. Madden David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0001353 0001359 Tue 10/03/2006 E-mail Karen Barnes, Esq. Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D.
ü DFJ01427 DFJ01427 Wed 10/25/2006 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Phillip Dutt, M.D. Savita P.
Shertukde, M.D.

Page 7 of 12
ü 0000824 0000824 Mon 11/06/2006 E-mail Evangeline Gallegos-Tolentino Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü 0000899 0000899 Tue 10/17/2006 Minutes Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü DFJ01439 DFJ01439 Tue 11/14/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000815 0000819 Thu 11/16/2006 Form Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü DFJ01445 DFJ01447 Fri 11/17/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000774 0000774 Sat 11/18/2006 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D.
ü DFJ01448 DFJ01448 Wed 11/22/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000839 0000839 Wed 11/22/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000852 0000852 Mon 11/27/2006 E-mail Evangeline Gallegos-Tolentino Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü 0000809 0000809 Tue 11/28/2006 E-mail Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D. Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü DFJ01454 DFJ01454 Wed 11/29/2006 E-mail Joint Commission on Accreditation David F. Jadwin, D.O.
of Healthcare Organizations
ü DFJ01459 DFJ01459 Fri 12/01/2006 Letter Department of Health Services David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000776 0000796 Fri 12/01/2006 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D.
ü 0000797 0000807 Fri 12/01/2006 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. University of California, Los
Angeles Campus
ü 0000827 0000827 Mon 12/04/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01460 DFJ01461 Tue 12/05/2006 E-mail Tom Wheeler, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01469 DFJ01469 Tue 12/05/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01472 DFJ01473 Wed 12/06/2006 E-mail David F. Jadwin, D.O. Phillip Dutt, M.D.
10:49 a.m. PT

Page 8 of 12
ü 0001315 0001315 Thu 01/11/2007 Letter Phillip Dutt, M.D. College of American Pathologists
ü 0000810 0000814 Thu 11/30/2006 Report
ü DFJ01557 DFJ01558 Wed 01/31/2007 Letter Cindy Lighthill David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01618 DFJ01620 Wed 04/04/2007 Letter Eugene D. Lee, Esq. Karen Barnes, Esq.
ü 0001657 0001658 Tue 04/24/2007 Printout
ü DFJ01700 DFJ01701 Mon 04/30/2007 Letter Mark Wasser, Esq. Eugene D. Lee, Esq.
ü DFJ01705 DFJ01705 Tue 05/01/2007 E-mail Mark Wasser, Esq. Eugene D. Lee, Esq.
ü DFJ00302 DFJ00343 To Be Determined Form David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000855 0000855 To Be Determined Policy David F. Jadwin, D.O.
11:36 a.m. PT
12:13 p.m. PT
ü 0001343 0001343 Tue 12/26/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. Irwin Harris
2:42 p.m. PT
ü 0001466 0001467 Wed 12/06/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David K. Culberson
12:58 p.m. PT
ü DFJ01482 DFJ01482 Thu 12/07/2006 Letter David K. Culberson David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü 0000862 0000862 Thu 12/07/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. Yolanda Figueroa
9:05 a.m. PT
ü 0000863 0000863 Thu 12/07/2006 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David F. Jadwin, D.O.
ü DFJ01488 DFJ01492 Wed 12/13/2006 Letter David F. Jadwin, D.O. David K. Culberson
ü 0000896 0000896 Wed 12/13/2006 Letter Juan Felix, MD Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü 0000882 0000894 Thu 12/14/2006 Internal memo Phillip Dutt, M.D. peer review comm
ü 0001318 0001318 Mon 01/08/2007 Internal memo Phillip Dutt, M.D.

Page 9 of 12
ü 0001330 0001330 Thu 01/04/2007 E-mail Phillip Dutt, M.D. David K. Culberson
ü 0027100 0027101 Tue 02/06/2007 Internal memo Irwin Harris
ü 0027098 0027098 Wed 10/25/2006 Internal memo Irwin Harris
ü 0027093 0027093 Wed 08/23/2006 Internal memo Rae McDonald
ü 0027087 0027088 Fri 06/09/2006 Internal memo Irwin Harris
ü 0027083 0027084 Wed 05/10/2006 Internal memo Irwin Harris
ü 0027081 0027082 Wed 08/03/2005 Internal memo Frances Hardin CaravantesD, CruiseC, MoralesC
ü 0027080 0027080 Sun 08/07/2005 Internal memo Royce Johnson, M.D. Jennifer Abraham, M.D.
ü 0027062 0027063 Wed 02/12/1992 Internal memo Sheldon Freedman, M.D. ArsuraE
ü 0026887 0026888 Tue 12/26/2006 Letter Parakrama Chandrasoma, M.D. Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü 0026503 0026504 Thu 12/14/2006 Internal memo Phillip Dutt, M.D. Peer Review Comm
ü 0026379 0026383 Thu 05/04/2006 Contract William Colburn, MD, Bernie
Barmann, Esq.
ü 0026375 0026378 Wed 10/04/2006 Contract Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D., Bernie
Barmann, Esq.
ü 0026251 0026270 Tue 06/21/2005 Contract Phillip Dutt, M.D., Peter Bryan, Ray
Watson, Kay F. Madden, Karen
Barnes, Esq.
ü 0026246 0026265 Tue 11/01/2005 Contract Savita P. Shertukde, M.D., Peter
Bryan, Ray Watson, Kay F.
Madden, Karen Barnes, Esq.

Page 10 of 12
ü 0026194 0026202 Mon 10/10/2005 Contract Phillip Dutt, M.D., Barbara Patrick,
David K. Culberson, Irwin Harris,
Kay F. Madden, Karen Barnes,
Esq.
ü 0026191 0026209 Tue 06/19/2007 Contract Gian A. Yakoub, D.O., MabenD,
Paul Hensler, EspinosaL, Karen
Barnes, Esq.
ü 0026049 0026093 Tue 08/22/2000 Policy
ü 0025982 0026011 Mon 09/12/2005 Report Peter Bryan Board of Supervisors
ü 0025924 0025981 Wed 08/30/2006 Letter William Colburn, MD Bernie Barmann, Esq., Karen
Barnes, Esq.
ü 0021161 0021162 Mon 12/10/2007 Minutes Alan Scott Ragland, M.D.
ü 0021159 0021160 Mon 01/14/2008 Minutes Alan Scott Ragland, M.D.
ü 0021121 0021137 Sat 07/01/2006 Report
ü 0017375 0017377 Thu 11/30/2006 Letter Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D. Phillip Dutt, M.D.
ü 0017371 0017374 Mon 10/30/2006 Letter Bernie Barmann, Esq., Karen Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D.
Barnes, Esq.
ü 0010924 0010924 To Be Determined Internal memo
ü 0010014 0010016 Mon 12/11/2006 Minutes Arlene Ramos-Aninion, David K.
Culberson
ü 0010564 0010606 Tue 05/10/2005 Policy
ü 00009919 00009921 Mon 09/10/2007 Minutes Arlene Ramos-Aninion, Alan Scott
Ragland, M.D.
ü 00009886 00009888 Mon 12/12/2005 Minutes Peter Bryan
ü 00009157 00009161 Tue 01/07/2003 Minutes Navin Amin, M.D.

Page 11 of 12
ü 00007885 00007889 Tue 07/03/2007 Minutes Alan Scott Ragland, M.D.
ü 0027447 0027447 Tue 06/04/2002 Internal memo Leonard Perez, M.D.
ü 0027444 00027445 Fri 04/05/2002 Internal memo Leonard Perez, M.D. Peter Bryan
ü 0027430 0027430 Tue 09/25/2001 Internal memo Marvin Kolb Joseph Mansour, M.D.
ü 0027381 0027381 Fri 04/12/2002 Letter Peter Bryan Rebecca Rivera, M.D.

Page 12 of 12

314 Plaintiffs Pretrial Statement

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

314 Plaintiffs Pretrial Statement

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-DLB Document 314 Filed 04/17/2009 Page 1 of 85

1 Eugene D. Lee (SB#: 236812)

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

1 This is an individual action brought by Plaintiff David F. Jadwin, D.O., a whistleblowing

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

1 Defendants concede Plaintiff’s such right to a jury trial.

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

1 accompanying physician’s note. (Id.)

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

(Doc. 259-7 at 2.)

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

1 that he had a reasonable belief that incomplete PCCs were unlawful.

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

1 their face, that they were accompanied by a “Physician’s Note.” (Id.).

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

1 1138 (5th Cir. 1985).

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

V. DISPUTED EVIDENTIARY ISSUES

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

1 at 70 (internal quotation marks omitted).

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

23 Elsa Ang, M.D. Former Pathologist 4200 Sill Pl, Bakersfield 93306‐3151

Full Name Title Addresses

18 Michele Burris Supervisor, Blood Bank 1830 Flower Street

20 William Busch, ENT Surgeon 1830 Flower Street

22 Michael Cann, Current ‐ Treating Orthopedic 1818 Verdugo Blvd Ste 201

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

18 Beverly Gambrell Locum Tenens bevgambrell@yahoo.com

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

27 David Lieu, M.D. Pathologist Consultant 1613 Chelsea Road, Ste 323, San Marino, CA 91108

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

12 Paul Palmeri Locum Tenens Histotech (704) 650‐1056

13 Patricia Parada Clerical Staff, Pathology 1830 Flower Street

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

7 Patricia Perez Human Resources at Kern 1830 Flower Street

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

10 William Roy, Director, Gynecologic‐Oncology Pacific Gynecologic Specialists (Dr. Roy was a general

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

22 Ray Watson Supervisor Fourth District Contact Information

USDC, ED Case No. 1:07-cv-00026 OWW DLB

Full Name Title Addresses

16 Tai Yoo, M.D. Chief, Psychiatry & Member, Kern Medical Center / UMPK1830 Flower Street