Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014
Executive Summary
E.1 Changes Since Our 2011 Report
E.1.1 Everything Changes to Remain the Same
Page | 1
CIRs basic qualitative conclusions about the structure and future of the active optical cabling (AOC) market has not changed that much since our 2011 report, or indeed our report before that. We continue to believe that AOCs will obtain most of their near-term revenues from larger corporate data centers where AOCs are seen as the most effective way to upgrade to fiber, especially in the context of InfiniBand. This is a real business and will continue to be a significant growth area. However, it is inherently never going to be a large business. There are just so many data centers in the world or ever will be. The reason why cable assembly firms and related businesses get excited about the AOC business is that many of them believe that AOCs will eventually find their way into much larger addressable markets that provide very high-volume opportunities to a much greater degree than IB ever could. These include consumer electronics and mainstream computing, where the number of interfaces shipped is in the hundreds of millions. The other area where AOC makers continue to see a future is in digital signage.
E.1.2 How Growth and Prices Have Changed Since 2011
All of the above could have been written in our 2011 report and indeed was. Nonetheless, in 2012 we are less bullish in this report than in our previous report and this is reflected in our forecasts. The biggest change comes as a result of our reducing the prices associated with AOCs. When we first started covering this sector, information on AOC pricing was hard to come by and the pricing that existed seemed to indicate that AOCs fell into the category of expensive cable assemblies. In 2013, the prices have dropped dramatically, AOCs have become widely available, and pricing information is also easy to get. The evidence here is that AOCs are rapidly become commoditized, which is not necessarily a good thing for the AOC business and will most probably force AOC vendors to attack mass markets with a new aggressiveness. The other big change from the CIR 2011 report on AOCs is that we have reduced penetration numbers and in some cases the addressable markets themselves. This is primarily because the worlds economic pain has continued longer than we expected in 2011. The one exception to this is in the digital market, which looks more exciting than it did in 2011.
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
AOCs involvement in the big data story is miniscule, but there can be no doubt that the growth in data traffic as the result of social networking, regulatory requirements, interactive video, the Internet-of-Things (IoT) and so on, will require to scale up data centers and/or build entirely new ones. This trend will surely mean new fiber in the data center andsince AOCs are a good entry to local fiberbig data will be good news for AOCs. A specific positive for AOCs, CIR believes, is that the big data trend may hit some data centers like a tsunami and there will have to be major upgrades and new centers built quite quickly. But the full force of this trend may not really be felt until there is a significant recovery in the worldwide economy in (perhaps) 2014 or 2015.
E.2.2 Co-Location and AOCs
Co-location is leading to large new data centers being set up, and each of these represents a potentialand fast growingmarket for AOCs. However, there is an important caveat here. Some of the firms that recently moved into leasing out data centers and related services are looking at very rapid returns on investment and are achieving this goal to some extent by using the lowest cost hardware available. CIR believes that AOCs may not be able to qualify for inclusion in such cases.
E.2.3 Market and Product Trends for AOCs in the Corporate Data Center
With all that said, specific trends in the data center that impact AOCs havent really changed all that much in three years or more. AOCs got their start in the CX4 replacement market, but today CX4 cable shipments are very low and, while there a legacy business to be had in this space, this is not a business for the future. In any case, today the network manager who decides that he or she wants
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
When we wrote about 40/100 Gbps in our 2011, this technology (for the data center anyway) was still very speculative. Today it is very much in the mainstream with many important vendors beginning to supply boxes with 40/100 Gbps ports. Whatever 40/100 Gbps standards eventually prevail, AOC cabling can still represent a viable alternative to discrete fiber-optic cable. However, CIR continues to believe that AOC vendors see 40G links as both easier to implement and as providing more revenues in the short-to-medium term than 100-Gbps links; there are plenty of 40-Gbps AOCs around. The 100-GigE market is probably a place where AOC firms can make themselves a little bit of money now with a lot more to be made in the long run. The point here is that eventually 40 Gbps is going to go away and 100 GigE will prevail because of falling component costs. The big question is when? Nobody really knows the answer to that question. In any case, we are not seeing many signs of 100-Gbps AOCs appearing on the market. AOC vendors, incidentally, also see no problems in extending their products to support very high data rate versions of InfiniBand that may appear in the future.
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
Page | 4
The ubiquity of USB and the fact that it is being upgrade to much higher speeds means that it is a formidable competitor for AOCs. But the number of USB ports sold each yeararound two billionis stunning. Even a small penetration by AOCs into this market would make a difference. However, it is far from clear that such a penetration will ever happen; PC makers continue to introduce machines with USB 3.0 ports, for example. AOC solutions might compete with USB 3.0 cabling at some point in the future, because the price of AOCs appears to be declining rapidly and USB 3.0 requires expensive shielded differential twinax copper rather than the unshielded twisted-pair used in USB 2.0. If the latest incarnations of USB turn out to be harder or more costly to implement than is currently expected, then perhaps AOCs will grab part of this market. Working against AOCs in the PC space is the recent announcement from the USB 3.0 Promoter Group that they plan to upgrade to 10 Gbps; twice the current rate. When and if this happens, it will certainly give AOC vendors a run for their money. And CIR doubts whether those active in the USB 3.0 space are spending much time worrying about AOCs. At the beginning of 2013 Corning introduced optical USB 3.0 extender products of the and CIR notes that while these products might be considered the ultimate threat to AOCs, they actually are AOCs in all but name. So it is possible to think of Corning as the opener of the way for AOCs to surreptitiously make their way into the PC market.
E.3.2 Thunderbolt
Intels Thunderbolt standard was completed at around the same time that CIR produced its previous AOC report in 2011. Thunderbolt was developed by Intel, with help from Apple, and uses a Mini DisplayPort (MDP) connector; it combines PCI Express (PCIe) and DisplayPort (DP) into one serial signal alongside a DC power connection. Thunderbolt was originally supposed to be an optical standard, then known as LightPeak. However, it was found that the desired 10 Gbps could be reached using copper, though optical implementations of Thunderbolt have been implemented and sold by both Corning and Sumitomo. Intel is also reportedly working on optical Thunderbolt.
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
Page | 5
A LAN-on-motherboard (LOM) implementation is where a chip/chipset is embedded in a PC motherboard to handle network connections. Quite early on Finisar, with its serial Laserwire product, and TE Connectivity, with its QSFP product, became convinced that AOCs could be used on motherboards as the most effective way to allow multi-port server designs. If a serial AOC or a QSFP has proven itself as a LOM product, and companies such as Broadcom Corp. or Marvell Semiconductor Inc. can optimize LOM products for an AOC interface, the LOM intrusion into server markets can later materialize for desktops as well. But again, this is another one of those ideas about what could be done with AOCs that have never been widely implemented.
E.3.4 Active Optical Cabling for Board-to-Board Communications
Designers of very-short-reach interconnects, serving as bus extenders from board to board, always have been more willing than external link designers to experiment with proprietary physical media and protocols, so it is easy to see to imagine how AOCs might find a home in this sector.
E.3.5 3D, UHDTV and AOCs
Before HDTV became a mass-market realitysome observers believed that fiber optics would be necessary to transport itand predicted that optical cables would replace the more common coax cables within the home. Quite obviously, these prophesies have turned out to be wrong, although HDTV-over-fiber in the long-haul and in theaters is now the norm. With the advent of 3D television, there are now similar predictions being made about the need for fiber optics to handle 3D television, but again CIR has yet to see any major moves in that direction, although we also expect that these predictions of fiber-inthe-home will appear as each new phase of television technology emerges. In view of many optimistic predictions that were made for fiber optics at the dawn of HDTV, CIR believes that one should be a little skeptical about the need for fiber optics in the 3D or UHDTV context, expect in the context of theater and bar applications (where AOCs might be used) and for long-haul transport (where most AOC makers would fear to tread). That said, we note that Samsung has shown interest in using fiber-optic cable for autostereoscopic 3D and that according to some estimates the required home transport requirements would more than double if this kind of 3D TV ever becomes ubiquitous. At the very least one could imagine TV in the not-too-distant future taxing the capacity of first-generation USB 3.0, and making full use of HDMI, at the very least. Even if fiberoptic links (AOCs or otherwise) catch on just with videophiles, it could still make for a
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
Page | 6
The explosion of home videoincluding HD home videomay add a new dimension to high data rate requirements for home networking. What the home video production network may need is a simple plug-and-play capacity. This may encourage the use of an AOC network, probably based on HDMI interfaces, for the home. So far, AOC vendors are not developing business plans based on the likelihood of such a usage model, but certainly have it on their radar.
E.3.7 AOCs, HDMI and DisplayPort
HDMI: Generally speaking, an HDMI cable is based on four shielded twisted pairs. However, one of the biggest problems with HDMI is long runs. Obviously, one way to get around this is by using fiber optic cable instead. And HDMI does not specify any maximum range so the potential for selling fiber/AOCs into this space seems to be there. The fiber optic extenders that exist, often dont take HDMI much further than to around 300 meters or so and some offer a lot less than that. In addition, there is the usual problem of power, although at least one HDMI extender using an AOC approach bases its powering on a USB. But the main factor that keeps fiber out of the HDMI space is undoubtedly cost. DisplayPort: DisplayPort is not as successful as HDMI but has been supported by a number of manufacturers of computer monitors and video cards. According to its supporters, DisplayPort is supposed to complement HDMI, but it uses a very different kind of video transport. Long-distance transmission over fiber optics has been part of the DisplayPort spec since version 1.1a. While some AOC firms will continue to see DisplayPort as an opportunity, the USB and HDMI markets look like they have more revenue potential for most of them. But a few observers still believe that DisplayPort will do extremely well once older standards fade away in the 2013 to 2015. It remains to be seen what will actually happen. E.4 Active Optical Cabling in the Digital Signage Sector Some kinds of networking or point-to-point technology must be used in digital signage to link together the display, content server and some kind of medial player. Optical networking technology does not seem to be common in digital signage yet, but it is used. When smaller, local digital signage networks are combined to form larger networks, this is often accomplished over a fiber optic network, but what we are talking about here is much more likely to be leased fiber than AOCs. Wide-area networking of digital signage permits centralized control and also the auctioning off of specific time slots to particular advertisers.
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
Page | 8
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com
Page | 9
PO Box 4353, Charlottesville, VA 22905 Tel: 434-872-9008 Fax: 434-872-9014 www.cir-inc.com sales@cir-inc.com