State of the Union Update

This Crock is designed to give those whom have interest in my case and the progress made. It has become much easier for me to post these updates via The Crock than explain each area to my friends, family and loyal supporters that appreciate the tenacious effort we have put forth in search of ustice for my sons. !s always, every claim made in this blog is factual and is supported by relevant court rulings and documents. This month marks " long years in which the case began. Supreme Court Writ of Certiorari I eluded in a previous blog that I have decided to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for a #rit of Certiorari to hear my case. $ssentially, I am asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule the crooked ass courts of %entucky. !lthough writs are extremely difficult to have granted, the wise udges of our Supreme Court will grant them if a &manifest in ustice' has occurred and obvious constitutional rights of an individual have been violated. They will also grant a writ if it involves issues of &national importance'. The integrity of the legal system and the appearance of improprieties, or lack thereof, are considered to be of &national importance'. If the public loses confidence that the legal system is unfair or believe udges are ruling due to their disdain for others, the Supreme Court will reverse those cases and grant new proceedings to correct these corrupt and biased courts. The reason I believe I will be successful is because I have been contacted by several attorneys or professors of universities that are legal authorities on udicial dis(ualification that have expressed interest on writing an !micus )rief on my behalf. Charles *eyh of Indiana University, Stephen *illers, of +,U law School in +ew ,ork City and -effrey Stempel at the University of +evada .as /egas law school have all expressed interest. These well respected professors along with another experienced attorney by the name of Thomas 0gden of !lhambra, California are willing to assist me in getting a writ of certiorari. The mere fact that so many dignitaries are willing to help me prove that the rest of the United States, which my case has reached, believe a true manifest in ustice has taken place here in %entucky. These gentlemen are embarrassed by the actions of the udges in %entucky. $ven they agree that the good ole boy network appears to be alive and well in this great state that I love and have called home for over 1" years. I hope the udges that have ruled on my case are

reading this so that they may too feel the shame these experienced professors and attorneys feel for the legal system. They should truly be ashamed and embarrassed that they allowed a divorce action to reach the United States Supreme Court. They should be even further embarrassed that a self2taught country boy from )ardstown, %entucky has reached a pinnacle that +0+$ of them have nor ever reach. #hen you3re right, you3re right. Federal Court of Appeals I have filed the appeal from the #estern %entucky federal court ruling by ultra2 conservative -udge 4c%inley in .ouisville. $ssentially, -udge 4c%inley hit the chicken switch on my case. The udge dismissed my case stating that I was arguing the outcome of a state ruling involving a state interest, which is barred by the 5ooker26eldman 7octrine. This doctrine states that a federal court cannot intervene into a state court proceeding U+.$SS the method of how the state courts 8crooked ass -udge *eorge, %entucky Court of !ppeals and Supreme Courts9 was unconstitutional. In my suit, I argue ust that. I argue that my 7ue :rocess rights to fair and impartial proceedings were violated by the mere fact that -udge *eorge dis(ualified himself because -ustices 4ary +oble and #ill T. Scott of the %entucky Supreme Court stated -udge *eorge was &pre2 udging' me in his rulings. This absolutely proves that -udge *eorge was biased against me from day one of the court proceedings. $ven if it didn3t provide as proof, the law states that once a udge is dis(ualified, !.. proceedings are deemed voidable because it cannot be determined when he started disliking me. I also argue that -udge *eorge destroyed evidence during the trial that proves that the crooked ass psychologists involved in my custody case, 7r. *inger Crumbo and 7r. -ennifer Cebe, were conspiring with the 6actory3s attorneys and perhaps -udge *eorge to keep my children from me for years without any cause whatsoever. -udge *eorge admitted to &shredding' legal subpoenaed evidence and would not allow me to see it. 6or those who do not know the law; %5S "<1.=>> 2 Tampering with physical evidence, states? 8=9 ! person is guilty of tampering with physical evidence when, believing that an official proceeding is pending or may be instituted, he?

8a9 Destroys, mutilates, conceals, removes or alters physical evidence which

he believes is about to be produced or used in the official proceeding with intent to impair its verity or availability in the official proceeding; ( ! "ampering with physical evidence is a Class D felony# +0 0+$, not even a udge can destroy evidence, especially during the pendency of a trial. It is a felony as pointed out by the %entucky 5evised Statute above. #hy is this udge not disbarred for committing a felony@ 8see crooked ass udges comment in paragraph =9. There is no doubt in my mind that the 6ederal Court of !ppeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati, 0hio will overturn that ruling, giving me two bites at the federal court apple to correct the case here in %entucky and get new proceedings from the start. ! &do over' if you will. District Court Case This is a /$5, interesting part of this edition of The Crock. 0n 6riday, +ovember <<, <>=A, ironically the ">th anniversary of the assassination of -ohn 6. %ennedy, I attended a trial by which the 6actory was attempting to have me convicted of a crime whereas I could spend up to = year in ail and a B">> fine. 0n !ugust <", <>=<, this craCy bitch maliciously had me arrested for sending her a &legal communication' from our divorce action. Since the 6actory and I represented ourselves in the family court matter, it is a legal re(uirement to correspond or send copies of various filings to each other that are filed with the court. -ill Stanley has filed at least AD motions with the family court to have me arrested and ailed for various reasons, has filed at least D complaints with the -efferson County :rosecutor3s 0ffice to have me arrested for some sort of violation and on -une A, <>=>, called the police on me while sitting in 4, driveway to have me arrested for entering my 0#+ home. +one of these attempts resulted in an arrest. !ll of the powers to be that received these complaints thought the 6actory was out of her mind and declined to grant her even one of the motions. Eowever, on !ugust <", <>=<, she found a dumbass detective by the name of -ohn -awar that was willing to arrest me for sending her a letter in which I plead with my ex2wife to keep our children out of the middle of our conflict so that they are not affected emotionally. This stupid bastard didn3t even ask if we both represented each other. Ee went to the worst udge in -efferson County history 8really9 in %atie %ing and had her sign a warrant for my arrest. 0h by the way, I had turned down -udge %atie %ing for a date A weeks prior to her signing that warrant. Talk about a scorned woman@ I turned her down because she has a reputation of sleeping

around. )elieve me, if I didn3t think I wouldn3t catch anything, I may have taken her out, ust to get one udge on my side, even if it was temporary. Eowever, fleas and crabs pole vault and I didn3t want to get too close to her. +eedless to say, I will not be endorsing -udge %ing in her re2 election efforts. !nyway, after =" months of -udge Sean 7elahanty pleading with the -efferson County :rosecutors *erina #hethers and -ackson Cooper to drop the case because they didn3t have one, a trial was scheduled. 0n 6riday, +ovember <<, <>=A, -udge 7elahanty ruled that the letter that I had sent -ill Stanley was a &legal communication' and did not violate the terms of the &no contact' order in place. In fact, -udge 7elahanty read the letter and stated that the letter was simply a plea from a father to the mother of his children to keep the kids out of the conflict before they are emotionally destroyed. !lthough -udge 7elahanty has a reputation as a fair and impartial udge, which he very much is, he did leave clues whereas he essentially agreed with me on this issue and chastised -ill for not only putting our children into the middle of the conflict, but that she had their father arrested for trying to protect them. -udge 7elahanty granted what is known as a 4otion in .imine. #e filed a motion stating that the letter could not be referred to as emotional abuse, which now became the :rosecutions claim. -ackson Cooper3s fat ass stated that the letter was my attempt to emotional abuse -ill Stanley. If the 6actory believes the letter I sent was emotional abuse, then how could she ever deny that keeping the kids from their father cannot be emotional abuse@ This fact will be brought back up in the family court action. So, as a result of -udge 7elahanty3s ruling, the :rosecution had no evidence to try and case. Therefore, -udge 7elahanty dismissed the case. Cooper stated the state may appeal his decision. *o aheadF Cooper would have to appeal the udge3s discretion to grant the 4otion in .imine, which under the abuse of discretion method, he will not prevail. $ven if by some stroke of luck, Cooper was successful in getting a higher court to overturn -udge 7elahanty3s decision, the udge still has the authority to direct a verdict of &not guilty' in the case if it were tried. -udge 7elahanty admitted that is what he would have done if the case were tried. If you live in %entucky, you should be pissedF The 6actory filed a complaint, had me arrested, booked and released, then ran the case through the %entucky court system for =" months, costing the state tens of thousands of dollars when the udge had stated from day one that she had no case at allF 7elahanty had asked the prosecution repeatedly for =" months to

dismiss the case or come up with some alternative option than trying the case in front of a ury. They declined. 7efending myself in this case also cost me over B=",>>> in attorney fees from Steve ,ater, who ripped -ackson Cooper up and spit him out in court. In addition to the money I spent, I spent a night in ail, my kids were told of my arrest for some unknown reason and I developed severe pain and suffering brought on by the stress of my arrest and the possibility of spending a year in ail. I have < doctors and < therapist that will confirm that since !ugust, <>=<, I had an abnormal testing in muscle and stress levels that lead to physical damage and pain, along with the mental anguish of being put in ail. #hich brings me to the fun part; !s a result of an incarceration and the causation of all of these symptoms, I can bring a civil action against the factory for malicious prosecution, abuse of process and Intentional Infliction of $motional 7istress. 4y attorney can and will prove to a ury that the 6actory took this action, along with some other actions that I will not discuss here, ust to cause me pain and make my life difficult. Since I spent a night in ail, these suits automatically pass the summary udgment phase of a civil action. +ow, the 6actory will have to hire an attorney to defend herself. There is +0 70U)T that I will at least recoup the ="% in attorney fees plus any attorney fees I spend on the suit. I believe I can also show compensatory damages, defamation and punitive damages due to the documented physical and emotional damage I suffered that the 6actory created by having me arrested for something I had obvious legal right to do. Suits like this bring hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars. #hen I win this suit, I will put forth every ounce of effort I have to collect from this bitch. I will likely add 4ichelle *anote, Steve *oodwin and Scott Stanley to this suit as well. It3s my time now. $aseball The 6actory continues to keep the kids from participating in baseball despite urging from the family court udge. Ee has ordered that a therapist be agreed to by both parties that will determine if it is in the best interest of the boys to play baseball at all and who they would play for. ,es, you read this correctly. The 6actory is arguing that they shouldn3t play baseball at all now. 4y boys have grown up on the baseball fields. #hile this whore was running around with other men, I was coaching my son3s baseball teams. It was permissible for them to play for me when we were married and she was sleeping with a doCen other men during games and practices which explains why she didn3t come to them very often. I remember being in Indianapolis for a

tournament with the boys. !ll other parents of the players were present except for her. I found out later that she was rendeCvousing with Scott Stanley that weekend. Eow pathetic is that@ $very therapist involved in this action has stated that the boys need baseball to cope with the pressures of what SE$ puts them through. So finding a therapist that will attest that not only do the boys need to be playing baseball, they should be playing as their father as coach. This is something they have begged for every year. This is their sanctuaryF I will then use the therapist assessment to take sole custody of the children. I have no doubt that a therapist that truly has the interest of the children at heart will wonder what the 6actory is doing to them emotionally and mentally by disallowing the boys this childhood right of baseball with their father. #hen the therapist provides hisGher input to the court, I will make sure there are orders in place making this craCy bitch get the boys to practice, games and every other baseball function. )ecause the 6actory or her husband has been able to behave themselves at the :atriots games, I have banned them from attending any of these games until they can demonstrate they can behave and stop making comments to the parents about our divorce action while parents are trying to watch their sons play baseball. There is no place for that in baseball. I want the children to have their parents at all the games but only if it is less stressful for them to have the 6actory attend. 0therwise, she will be ceremoniously removed from the park. !s president of the :atriots organiCation, I have the authority to have anyone removed from our private league. Stay tuned on this issue.