Share

More

Next Blog

Create Blog Sign In

Home

Shoe Shop

Tutorials

Resources

Advertise

About Me

SPONSORED ADS

SATURDAY, MARCH 16, 2013

How Wide Should Your 18th Century Panniers Be?

LACMA grand panier

I've set out on the adventure of making a Grand Pannier to wear under voluminous 18th century apparel, and the first question that came to mind is - how wide was the typical pannier? I thought perhaps they ran the gamut (and they do), but the more I looked at various mid-18th century gowns, the more I noticed the same proportions. Proportion in historical costume is just as important today as it was then. Proportioned garments are why that 1760s Robe a la Francaise looks itty-bitty, but actually has a 30 inch waist. Too wide in the panniers didn't seem to be a problem, but too narrow does not flatter the figure. So what are these magical proportions?

Subscribe to The American Duchess Newsletter: email address

Subscribe

American Duchess - 18t

Like

6,854 people like American Duchess - 18th c

Thirds and Quarters.

The A, B, and C boxes represent the thirds - the blue box in the center is the width of the
waist (your waist measurement divided by two). The yellow boxes roughly measure the distance from the side seams to where the pannier begins to slope downwards. Surprise! The blue and

F acebook social plugin

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

yellow boxes are the same size. The length of each side of the pannier is also half the circumference of your waist.

DUCHIES:

ARTICLES ON... 16th Century (17) 1740s Riding Habit (9) 1765 LACMA Sacquema (3) 1770s Parisian Gown (10) 1780 Indienne Gown (7) 1780s Revolution Dress (14) 1790 Robe Royaliste (6) 1790s Striped Jacket (4) 17th Century (29) 1880 Green Acres Gown (10) 18th c. Man's Suit (12) 18th Century (247) 1912 Titanic Gown (10) 1920s (44) 1930s (4) Accessories (59) Boutique (21) Colonial Williamsburg (46) corset training (4) Costume Analytics (13) Design Sketches (32) Edwardian (47) Events (61) Hats (24) How-To (56) Interviews (5) Miscellany (137) Patterning (15) Photography (23) Regency (40) Research (112) Reviews (10) Shoes (133) Small Biz Betties (8) Stays (15) Steampunk (10) Tea and Things (33) Undies (44) Victorian (72) Vintage (137) Vintage365 (349) Wigs and Hair (42) COSTUME BLOGS OF WIN: Two Nerdy History Girls 2NHG Library: A Dictionary of the

Etsy
americanduchess

SUBSCRIBE TO Posts Comments

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Vulgar Tongue 7 minutes ago The Hair Hall of Fame Profiles in

Courage 1 hour ago WeSewRetro.com My Retro style wedding dress 1 hour ago OMG that dress! okay seriously tumblr needs to fix the reblog-to-thewrong-blog thing 1 hour ago Fuck Yeah, Victorians! weirdvintage: No musty flavorthe only healthy beverage that... 1 hour ago
Show All

The 1, 2, 3, and 4 on the bottom are the quarters - these divide the hem of the skirt into four
parts. These parts are roughly equal to the width of your shoulders. You can use Thirds and Quarters to break down the width of the hoops in your pannier, too. For instance, my bottom hoop will be 2 thirds added to two quarters, like this:

MORE COSTUME BLOGS: male pattern boldness Metallics for Men - YEA or NAY? 8 hours ago Cation Designs

Accidental Aladdin Pants 11 hours ago Tilly and the Buttons Sneaky Peek of My New Pattern! 15 hours ago Lilacs & Lace Eva Dress Pattern Contest Open for Voting! 19 hours ago kickshawproducti ons.com Then and Now Shoes inspired by the past 1 day ago
Show All

So with these measurements, I know that my pannier, at the top, will be 39 inches across, and my bottom hoop 54 inches across. Multiply each of these by two, to account for front and back, and that will help determine the length of your pannier hoops. (You will need to add the depth to this front/back measurement, or else you pannier, when wrangled into hooped position, will "shrink") Whether you are robust or thin, this proportion should work for you. If your waist is 36 inches, then your grand pannier should be 54 inches across at the waist. If your waist is 20 inches, then your grand pannier should be 30 inches across at the waist. These are not hard and fast rules, just some things to consider when planning your side-hooped ensembles. Remember, bigger is always fine, but too narrow and you may not be displaying yourself or your gown in the best way.

EVEN MORE COSTUME BLOGS: Bunny's Vintage Victory Ask

Bunny...Questions Answered! 2 hours ago We Heart Vintage Queen of the tiny waist: Betty Brosmer 5 hours ago
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Posted by Lauren R at 10:30 AM

5 hours ago
Recommend this on Google

Labels: 1765 LACMA Sacque-ma, 18th Century, Research, Undies

7 comments:
Mona March 16, 2013 at 12:37 PM Wow, thanks! I think I'm not gonna make one but this is very helpful when drawing 18th century fashion! Yay, thank you:) Reply Replies Lauren R March 17, 2013 at 3:30 PM

Oh So Lovely Vintage It's Stef's

birthday! 11 hours ago Folklore Fashion blogg Photo exhibitions and new releases. 20 hours ago Lucy's Corsetry Corsets Ive tried in order of price range 1 day ago
Show All

Glad it is helpful! Reply

Comtesse Olympe de la Tour D'Auvergne March 16, 2013 at 1:15 PM Great post, really helpful! Reply

Paula March 16, 2013 at 2:06 PM As a math enthusiast I have to comment on your calculations. It's not half of your waist measurement but the diameter of your waist measurement (now assuming the waist is roughly a circle...). So each box is waist divided by Pi. For a less circular approximation one could and probably should pick something between waist/Pi and waist/2 so the pannier doesn't end up being too narrow. Reply Replies Lauren R March 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM

However you arrive at the same idea... Reply

MrsC (Maryanne) March 17, 2013 at 1:00 PM Lauren you have a fantastic eye, this is such a great revelation! To get the apparent width of the waist, a couple of sticks or rulers held against the sides of your waist while someone measured the distance between them would do it, I am sure, and maybe the diff between this and the circumference of the waist could give a tracking proportion for the rest of the depths since they are all ovoid not circular? It could be the Robe a la Francaise Pi! (which as Paula said, is probably somewhere between 2 and Pi) So, each layer as you go down would be its apparent width x RalF Pi. :) I wonder if mantua makers knew this or just eyeballed it. It's like the golden proportion in architecture. Tell me, do you ever sleep, or do you just lay awake coming up with gorgeous shoes, photo shoots, clothes, costumes, proportional keys, and the myriad other incredible and creative ideas that we are so fortunate to benefit from? :) Reply Replies Lauren R March 17, 2013 at 3:32 PM

I don't know if 18th century makers were using the math calculations, but proportion, most certainly. I wonder if anything was published in surviving manuals...? I sleep...sometimes, hehe. Reply

Enter your comment...

Comment as:

Select profile...

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

Publish

Preview

Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Older Post

Original content (c) 2008-2013 Lauren Reeser, unless otherwise linked or stated. Picture Window template. Powered by Blogger.

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com