Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A BETTER
FUTURE
C
CHHART
ART BO
BO O
OKK
AGE
D
EM
&
O
IC S
G
O M
RA
N
ECO IN C M
E
O
PH
The Committee
IC
For A
SO C IAL SEC U RIT Y
S
Responsible
Federal Budget
HEALT H C A RE
T A X REFO RM January 2000
About the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
The Committee is a bipartisan, non-profit educational organization committed to educating the public regarding the budget
process and issues that have significant fiscal policy impact. The Committee sponsors analysis and research, conducts educational
symposia, and prepares and distributes educational materials.
Goals
The broad long-range goal is to educate the public on the federal budget process and on the need for discipline and order in
making spending and revenue decisions. The immediate, specific goal is to point out the prospect and consequences of continuing
to delay action to address the longer-term fiscal and social policy challenges facing the nation.
The public must understand that such delay could lead to deficits much larger than the country faced in the last quarter century—
deficits and debt so large as to threaten the very fabric of the country’s economic and political life.
What We Do
The Committee sponsors symposia on budget and economic issues. We provide speakers for civic, academic, and business groups,
and hold Congressional breakfasts for Members of the House and Senate interested in dialogue on the budget and related issues.
Committee staff and Board Members write about the budget and related issues for major media outlets, provide background
information and educational materials, and help explain the budget and the budget process to many audiences.
In the fall of 1982, the Committee launched an ambitious education and outreach program on the problem of the deficit. The
Exercise in Hard Choices is to inform the American people of the nature and magnitude of the deficit and debt problems facing the
country and the limited choices available to solve those problems. The Exercise is updated regularly to reflect the actual choices Congress
and the Administration are considering to reduce the Federal deficit and reorder national priorities. The Committee provides the Exercise
workbook to educational organizations and other interested parties at cost.
The Committee is a 501[c][3] educational organization. All of its activities are funded through tax deductible contributions from
individuals, foundations, corporations, and other interested groups. It accepts no government funding.
The most recent version of The Exercise is called Building a Better Future: An Exercise in Hard Choices. In a joint effort with American Express
Financial Advisors, we adapted The Exercise to address issues raised in the Fraying of America project. Over a-year-and-a-half, from materials
development to completion, we held eight Exercises around the country. Thirty organizations participated and the project contributed greatly to
this report. We thank everyone who played a part in this tremendous information-gathering, public education effort.
Table of Contents
Economics 1-5
Demographics 6-15
Budget 16-28
Federal Government
Taxes (income, payroll, etc.) OASDI
Individuals General Trust Fund
Fund
Outlays (Benefits)
HI Trust Fund
Net personal Unified budget
savings takes the surpluses reduce
form of indirect outstanding public debt
investment (bank and add to national
deposits, mutual savings. Unified budget
funds, employer- Personal deficits decrease
sponsored savings Net National national savings.
retirement plans). Savings Public investment
Personal savings (Financial Assets) includes government
add to national Deficits/Borrowing spending for physical
savings. or infrastructure (roads,
Investment Surpluses/Debt reduction buildings, etc).
(Physical
Assets)
Direct investment Outlays
(e.g., homes)
1
Net National Saving: 1960-1998
12.0% Net Government Saving Net Private Saving Net National Saving
10.5%
10.0% 9.1%
8.0%
7.5%
Percent of Net Nationa Product
6.2%
6.0% 6.5%
4.0% 4.4%
2.0%
0.0%
-2.0%
-4.0%
1960-69 1970-79 1981-89 1990-94 1995-96 1997-98 *
* 1998 is first six months. 2
Source: Committee for Economic Development
Savings Continue to Decline
(In percentage of NNP)
Govt Savings Private Savings Net Investment
14%
12%
10%
Net National Product
8%
6%
4%
2%
-1%
1960-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-94 1995-96 1996-97
-3%
4
Source: Committee for Economic Development, 1996.
Standards of Living More Than Doubled
Between 1966-1996 $4,688
in 1996
$5,000
$4,500
Personal Consumption per capita (1996$)
$4,000
$3,500
$3,000
$1,902
$2,500 in 1966
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
350
Total Population (millions)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2050
6
Source: Bureau of the Census.
Labor Force Participation: 1950-2050*
90%
87%
84%
81%
80% 78%
77%
75%
73%
70% 70%
67% 67% 66% 67% 67% 67%
64% 65%
61% 62%
60% 60% 60% 59%
58% 59% 59%
57%
54%
52% 52% 52% 51%
50%
43%
40%
38%
34%
30%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
1940 14 55 8
Men
1995 18 45 17
1940 14 54 12
Women
1995 19 45 21
8
Source: Bureau of the Census, 1997.
Number of Workers per
Beneficiary is Falling
Projections
1960: 5.1 workers
5 per beneficiary
Ratio of Workers per Beenficiary
1
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
40
35
30 38 39 39 38
37
36
33
25 30 30 30
29 28
25 27
23 24
20
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
10
Source: Bureau of the Census, 1997.
Projected Population Trends
U. S. Population: Race, Ethnicity and Age
Under 65 65 and older
by Race and by Race and
Ethnicity Total Population by Age Ethnicity
15%
28%
25%
43%
Under 65 80%
2030 20% 65 and Older 75%
57%
34%
51%
2050 Under 65 80% 20% 65 and Older
66%
49%
20% 20%
20% Percentage of Floridians age 65 and over today: 19%
17%
15% 13%
13% 13%
11%
10%
10% 9%
8%
7%
5%
0%
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
12
Source: Bureau of the Census.
Life Expectancy at Age 65
22 Projections
Males Females
20
18
Number of Years
16
14
12
10
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Source: Historical Data: Board of Trustees of the Federal OASDI Trust Funds (1997).
Bureau of the Census intermediate assumptions, (September 1996).
13
Life Expectancy at Birth
85
80
75
70
65
Total Male
60 Total Female
White Male
White Female
55
Black Male
Black Female
50
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1995 2000 2010 2020 2030
14
Source: Bureau of the Census, 1997.
Baby Boom -- Baby Bust
4500 1957 = 4,308 Projections
4000
3500
Total Births (000's)
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
15
Source: Bureau of the Census and Office of National Health Statistics, 1997.
Federal Budget as a Percentage of GDP
30%
36.9%
20.1%
4.0% 4.0%
20%
0.4%
5.6% 2.6%
3.0%
15% 3.0%
3.1% 3.0%
Other
Post-World War II Average: Projections
Social Insurance 18% of GDP 1998-2008
Corporate
20% Individual
Percent of GDP
10%
0%
CBO
1950-1959
1960-1969
1970-1979
1980-1989
1990-1997
Pres. 1999
Budget
Source: CBO January 1999 17
CBO Unified Deficit/Surplus Projections Continue to Improve
300
January 1999
Deficits(-)/Surpluses(+) in $ bllions
100
-100
Actuals
January 1997
-300
January 1995
-500
January 1993
-700
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Fiscal Years
18
Source: CBO, The Economic and Budget Outlooks for January 1993, January 1995, January 1997 and January 1999.
Changes in CBO Deficit Projections by Source:
January 1997-January 1999
700
500 234
209
400 202
185
168 178
300
-100
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Fiscal Years
Source: CBO, The Economic and Budget Outlooks: January 1997, March 1997, 19
September1997, January 1998, March 1998, July 1998, and January 1999.
Federal Budget Deficits: 1930 to 2050
10% Improved, but Still Unsustainable, Outlook
5%
0%
Feb. 1998 est.
Percent of GDP
-5%
Actual Projections
-10% under
Deficits
Current Policies
-15%
-20%
Oct. 1997 est.
-25%
-30%
-35%
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Fiscal Years
Source: CRFB based on OMB historical data (1998), CBO projections (July 1998), and GAO projections 20
(October 1997 and February 1998).
Recent Improvements Delay, but Do Not Fix, Projected
Deterioration in Long-Term National Debt Situation
1998
250%
Projections
200%
Percent of GDP
150%
World War II
100%
Oct. 1997 est.
January 1999
50%
Civil War World War I
0%
00
50
00
50
00
40
60
18
18
19
19
20
20
20
Source: Historical Data: OMB, 1997. Projections: GAO estimates, 1998 and 21
Congressional Budget Office January 1999.
Budget Scenarios Under Alternate
Assumptions in 2030
(as a Percentage of GDP)
30
25 Revenue (19%)
5.5
6.9
Percent of GDP
2.6 2.3
20 2 .4
2 .1
5.1 4.6
15 5.0 2.6
4.3 0.5 2.0
1.0
10 0.5 6.4
5.7 5.2 4.7
4.9
5
6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8
5.2
0
19% of GDP 23% of GDP 23% of GDP Deficit 26% of GDP 27% of GDP
Balance
$50,000
$35,000
$30,000
$25,000
$0 2000 2015 2030 2045
Net Interest
$500
$400
$300
$200
$0
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Source: Office of Management and Budget, Historical Tables: Budget o f the United States Government,
Fiscal Year 1998, February 1997; Congressional Budget Office, The Economic and 24
Budget Outlook: Fiscal Years 1998-2007, January 1997.
Entitlement Programs are Taking
Over the Budget
45% Projections
40%
35%
Percent of GDP
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
25
Source: Historical Data: OMB, 1998. Projections: GAO estimates, February 1998.
Discretionary Spending: Five Year
14%
Averages
12%
President’s
10% 6.3 % in 2004 Request
Percent of GDP
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
1965-1969 1970-1978 1975-1979 1980-1984 1985-1989 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000-2004
Natural Resources
& Environment
8% Transportation
14%
Health Research &
Public Health Housing & Income
9% Security
13%
27
Source: CBO projections, January 1999.
Federal Aid to State and Local Governments
(in 1994 dollars)
100%
16% 15%
90% 25% 24% 23%
4% 7%
80% 4%
4% 3% 3%
3%
70% 3% 4% 6% 9% 8%
Other
11% 8% 9%
11% Agriculture, State Child Nutrition
60% 14%
HUD
12% 14%
50% 16% Family Support
16%
17% Transportation
40% Education, Training, Soc Svcs
25% 24% 16%
Medicaid
30%
20% 34%
40%
22% 27%
10% 22%
0%
1975 1980 1985 1990 1994
Source: Health Care Financing Administration, 1996. 28
Official Poverty Rates: 1960-1997
35%
20%
10%
Adults 18 to 64
5%
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
Source: Bureau of the Census, September 1996 and web site October 1998.
29
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
Poverty Rates by Selected Characteristics
1980 & 1997
All Races White African American Hispanic Origin
45% 42%
40% 38%
37% 37%
35% 33%
31%
30%
25%
20% 21% 22%
20% 18%
16% 16%
14% 14%
15%
11%
9%
10%
5%
0%
2% 3% 2%
100%
2%
5%
90% 17% 2%
25%
80%
70% 20%
60% Other
27%
Assets
50% 20% Earnings
88% Pensions/Annuities
40%
OASDI
25%
30%
20% 41%
10% 21%
0%
Total Lowest fifth Highest fifth
Source: EBRI, April 1999. (under $6,323) (over $22,798)
Pensions
19%
Asset Income
18%
Other
3%
Soc. Sec.
42%
32
Source: SSA, Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 1996.
Composition of Elderly Income
Highest Quintile: 1994 Pension
21%
Earnings
28% Asset Income
24%
Public Assistance
1% Other
3%
Soc. Sec.
23%
33
Source: SSA, Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 1996.
Composition of Elderly Income
Lowest Quintile: 1994 Public Assistance
Other
11%
2% Earnings
0% Pension
3%
Asset Income
3%
Soc. Sec.
81%
34
Source: SSA, Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 1996.
Average Social Security Retirement Age:
1940-1995
74
73
72
Men Women
71 Women
Average Age of Retirement
70
69
68
Men
67
66
65
64
63
62
1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
35
Source: Social Security Bulletin, Annual Statistical Supplement, 1996.
Social Security Income & Cost
Rates: 1950-2050
20% Projections
Cost
Percent of Taxable Payroll
15%
Income
10% (payroll taxes only,
does not include
interest income)
5%
0%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Income Cost
36
Source: Social Security Trustees Annual Report, 1997.
Social Security Retirement Benefits Payable
at Normal Retirement Age
$30,000
$25,000 Projections
1996 Constant Dollars
$20,000
$0
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
37
Source: SSA unpublished tables and Board of Trustees of the OASDI Trust Funds, 1996.
Example 1a. Archer-Shaw Social Security Guarantee (SSG) Plan:
Private SSGAs
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits and General Trust Fund
Individuals additional interest expense
Fund 12.4%
National
Note: Solid lines indicate
ongoing flows. Dotted lines
Savings
Outlays: Stock/bond fund purchases
indicate future flows once
benefit payments begin.
Investment
(Physical
Assets)
39
Example 1c. Archer-Shaw Social Security Guarantee (SSG) Plan:
Public SSGAs, Credit Reform Scoring
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits and General Trust Fund
Individuals additional interest expense
Fund 12.4%
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
Individuals OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits, adjusted for General Trust Fund
12.4%
changes, and additional interest expense. Fund
Social Security
Stock and bond fund purchases would be Reserve Board
financed with unified budget surpluses.
Publicly held debt would be higher than
if surpluses were used to reduce public
debt. Surpluses/debt reduction foregone
Outlays: Stock/
bond fund purchases
National
Note: Solid lines indicate Future Receipts: Stock/bond
ongoing flows. Dotted lines
Savings
sales when needed
indicate future flows once to pay benefits
benefit payments begin. Investment
(Physical
Assets)
41
Example 2b. Aaron-Reischauer Social Security Reserve Investment Plan,
Credit Reform Scoring
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
Individuals OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits, adjusted for General Trust Fund
12.4%
changes, and additional interest expense. Fund
Social
Stock and bond fund purchases would be Security
financed with unified budget surpluses. Reserve Board
Publicly held debt would be higher than
if surpluses were used to reduce public
debt. Investment earnings expected to Surpluses/debt reduction foregone
exceed incremental interest cost.
National
Savings
(Financial
Note: Solid lines indicate Stock/bond fund purchases treated as
ongoing flows. Dotted lines
Assets)
non-budgetary. Cash exchanged for
indicate future flows once financial assets. No outlays.
benefit payments begin. Investment
(Physical
Assets)
42
Example 3a. Porter Individual Social Security Retirement Account Plan:
Private ISSRAs
Outlays:
OASDI Benefits
OASDI payroll
taxes: 12.4%
Federal Government
Individuals Benefits
(OASDI) OASDI
General 12.4%
New Outlays: Add’l Trust Fund
interest expense Fund 2%
46
Example 4b. President’s Plan,
Public USAs
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
Individuals General
OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits and additional Trust Fund
Fund 12.4%
interest expense
Tax credits,
matching pmts.
USAs
Individual Contributions
New Future Outlays:
USA retirement benefits
Surpluses/debt reduction foregone
Stock and bond fund purchases would be
financed with unified budget surpluses.
Publicly held debt would be higher than National
if surpluses were used to reduce public Savings
debt. (Financial
Assets) New Outlays for stock/bond purchase
New Future
Note: Solid lines indicate Investment Receipts: Sale of
ongoing flows. Dotted lines (Physical assets as needed
indicate future flows once Assets) for benefits
benefit payments begin.
47
Example 4c. President’s Plan,
Public USAs, Credit Reform Scoring
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
Individuals General
OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits and additional Trust Fund
Fund 12.4%
interest expense
Tax credits,
matching pmts.
USAs
Individual Contributions
New Future Outlays:
USA retirement benefits
Surpluses/debt reduction foregone
Stock and bond fund purchases would be
financed with unified budget surpluses.
Publicly held debt would be higher than National
if surpluses were used to reduce public Savings
debt. (Financial
Stock/bond fund purchases treated as
Assets) non-budgetary. Cash exchanged for
financial assets. No outlays.
Note: Solid lines indicate Investment
ongoing flows. Dotted lines (Physical
indicate future flows once Assets)
benefit payments begin.
48
Example 5a. Kolbe-Stenholm Plan,
Private ISAs
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
Individuals OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits, adjusted for General Trust Fund
10.4%
benefit changes, and additional interest. Fund
49
Example 5b. Kolbe-Stenholm Plan,
Public ISAs
Federal Government
Benefits
OASDI payroll taxes: 12.4%
Individuals General
OASDI
Outlays: OASDI benefits, adjusted for Trust Fund
Fund 10.4%
benefit changes, and additional interest.
2%
ISAs
Voluntary ISA
Contributions
New Future Outlays:
ISA retirement benefits
2%
ISAs
Voluntary ISA Contributions
New Future Outlays:
ISA retirement benefits
Stock and bond fund purchases would be OASDI benefit costs would be partially
financed with unified budget surpluses. financed with unified budget surpluses
Publicly held debt would be higher than National and new borrowing through 2014. After
if surpluses were used to reduce public Savings 2014, proposal would generate net
debt. (Financial surpluses.
Assets)
Note: Solid lines indicate Stock/bond fund purchases treated as
ongoing flows. Dotted lines Investment non-budgetary. Cash exchanged for
indicate future flows once (Physical financial assets. No outlays.
benefit payments begin. Assets)
51
Social Security & Medicare Costs
(as a Percentage of Taxable Payroll)
Projections
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
52
Source: SSA, Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 1996.
National Health Care 2007 = 16%
Expenditures Projections
1996 = 14%
15%
Percent of GDP
10%
1965 = 6%
5%
0%
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Source: CBO, January 1997. 53
Per Capita Health Care Expenditures by Age, 1977 & 1987
$10,000 $9,178
$8,000
Constant 1987 Dollars
$6,000 $5,360
1977
1987
$4,000 $3,481
$1,776
$2,000 $1,535
$1,234 $1,221
$745
$505
$0
All Ages Under 19 19 to 64 65 & over 85 & over
Source: CRFB based upon Health Care Financing Administration data reported in 65+ in the United States, U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington DC 20402. (This is the most recently published data available.) 54
Medicare Benefits
By Sources of Financing
350
300
200
150
100
50
0
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Projected
Source: CRFB based upon HCFA Office of the Actuary published data, March 1999. 55
Medicare Hospital Insurance Expenditures
1965 Estimates versus Actual Expenditures
$70,000 $66,239
$60,000
$47,580
$50,000
$40,000
1965 est.
Actuals
$30,000 $25,064
$20,000
$11,315
$8,797
$10,000 $6,860
$5,124 $4,047 $5,307
$987 $891 $2,860
$0
1966 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990
30%
25%
National Average = 17%
20%
33%
15%
24%
23%
10%
17%
15% 14% 14%
5%
1%
0%
Under 18 18-20 21-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
57
Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute Analysis of the March 1995 Current Population Survey.
The Heads of Most Uninsured Families Are Full-time Workers
Uninsured Population By Work Status of Family Head
Non-worker
Other Worker 6.2 million
10.6 million 15%
25%
Full-time Worker
24.6 million
41.4 million uninsured (1996) 60%
Source: Employee Benefit Research Institute estimates of the March 1997 Current Population Survey.
58
Percent of Total Federal Taxes Paid Compared to
Distribution of Tax Returns by Income Classes
1.2%
100%
4.5%
90% 6.0% 19.1%
80% 13.5%
59
Source: Joint Tax Committee, US Congress, 1997.
Federal Revenues
(Percentage of GDP)
Other
Post-World War II Average: Projections
Social Insurance 18% of GDP (1999 & 2009)
Corporate
20% Individual
Percent of GDP
10%
0%
1999 (Act)
1950-1959
1960-1969
1970-1979
1980-1989
1990-1997
2009 (Proj)
Source: CBO January 1999 60
Co-Chairmen
Timothy Penny Bill Frenzel
Directors
Thomas L. Ashley Roy L Ash
James Cooper Nancy Kassebaum Baker
James Exon Willis Gradison
William H. Gray, III James T. Lynn
Jim Hones W. Henson Moore
James T. McIntyre, Jr. June O’Neill
Leon Panetta Peter G. Peterson
Alice M. Rivlin John J. Rhodes
Charles Schultze David A. Stockman
James Slattery Joseph R. Wright, Jr.
Charles Bowsher
Robert S. Kerr, Jr.
Marne Obernauer
Rudolph g. Penner
Robert Reischauer
John W. Snow
Elmer Staats
Paul A. Volcker
Carol Cox Wait
Henry Bellmon
Robert Giaimo
Robert Strauss Carol Cox Wait
Senior Advixors President
Additional copies of this report in CD-ROM format may be obtained for $25.00 from:
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget expresses our continuing gratitude to the Hewlett-Packard Company.
We could not do our work without all of the equipment they so generously donate to us.