U.S.

Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board ofImmigration Appeals

Office ofthe Clerk

5107 Falls

Leesburg Pike, Suite 2000 Church, Virginia 20530

Hernandez, Christine M., Esq. Hernandez & Associates, P.C. 1490 Lafayette Street, Suite 307 Denver, CO 80218

OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - DEN 12445 East Caley Avenue Centennial, CO 80111-5663

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Name: MEZA-JURADO, IVAN

A 200-821-185

Date of this notice: 11/21/2013

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

DDnltL cl1/iA.)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk

Enclosure
Panel Members: Hoffman, Sharon

williame Userteam: Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Ivan Meza-Jurado, A200 821 185 (BIA Nov. 21, 2013)

. U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for :fitnmigration Review

t

Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Falls Church, Virginia 20530

File:

A200 821 185 - Denver, CO

Date:

NOV. 212013

In re: NAN MEZA-JURADO a.k.a. Yandel Ivan Ortiz-Jurado IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

APPEAL AND MOTION ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: ON BEHALF OF DHS: Christine M. Hernandez, Esquire

Wayne B. Paugh Assistant Chief Counsel

CHARGE: Notice: Sec. 212(a)(6)( A)(i), I&N Act [8 U.S.C. 1182(a )(6)( A)(i )] Present without being admitted or paroled Remand; administrative closure

APPLICATION:

Immigration Appeals ("Board"). The respondent subsequently filed a motion for remand and administrative closure. The Department of Homeland Security has filed a non-opposition to the respondent's. motion for remand and administrative closure on the basis of the respondent's warranted in light of the respondent's grant of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. recent grant of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. We find that administrative closure is

An appeal from the hnmigration Judge's decision in this case is currently before the Board of

the proceedings may be made to the Board. The Board will take no further action in this case the Clerk's Office, without fee, but with certification of service on the opposing party. Accordingly, the following order will be entered. ORDER:

If either party to this case wishes to reinstate the proceedings, a written request to reinstate

unless a request is received from one of the parties. The request must be submitted directly to

administratively closed.

The proceedings before the Board of Immigration Appeals in this case are

Cite as: Ivan Meza-Jurado, A200 821 185 (BIA Nov. 21, 2013)
@4 .$_ -C . m#iQQ .


/ '! ";'

l.

_\.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT DENVER, COLORADO

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

File:

A200-821-185

In the Matter of

IVAN MEZA-JURADO RESPONDENT

CHARGES:

APPLICATIONS:

ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: MS. HERNANDEZ, ESQUIRE ON BEHALF OF DHS: NATHAN L. HERBERT, ESQUIRE

ORAL DECISION OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE The Court would indicate that the Respondent was served a Notice to Appear on August 27 of 2010, by the U.S. Immigration and Nationalization Service, now known as Homeland Security. At that time, they indicated that the Respondent was of the Immigration

removable pursuant to Section 212(a} (6) (A} (i}

and Nationality Act as amended as an alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled who arrived in the

' , ,

'

United States at any time or place other than that designated by the Attorney General. On 6/22/11, the Respondent, through his attorney, admitted and conceded removability. Removability has been shown

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

by clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence. has an I-130.

The Respondent

The Court would indicate that Mr. Herbert has

informed the Court that they are not going to terminate the matter. Ms. Hernandez asked the Court to terminate the matter.

The Respondent's only avail relief is 120 days of voluntary departure to go bac k to Mexico to adjust his status, but Ms. Hernandez does not want that. The Court will go ahead and give

him voluntary departure for a period of 60 days until 6/25/2012, and I indicate that Ms. Hernandez would in fact reserve a right to appeal. The reason the Court's not going to give him anymore time is that he can't adjust here and Homeland Security is not agreeing to have him adjust in the United States or terminating the matter and the Court's not going to do that. nothing available other than voluntary departure. There's So the Court

will order that the Respondent be granted 60 days of voluntary departure at this time.

Immigration

A200-821-185

April 25, 2012

{
CERTIFICATE PAGE

I hereby certify that the attached proceeding before JUDGE DAVID J. CORDOVA, in the matter of:

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

IVAN MEZA-JURADO

A200-821-185

DENVER, COLORADO

is an accurate, verbatim transcript of the recording as provided by the Executive Office for Immigration Review and that this is the original transcript thereof for the file of the Executive Office for Immigration Review.

STEPHANIE L. FINK

(Transcriber)

YORK STENOGRAPHIC SERVICES, Inc. July 9, 2012 (Completion Date) slf /jma