Thirteen of Google, Inc. and Google India Pvt. Ltd.

owners, board members, and top

executives are being prosecuted in Criminal Court in India for violations of the Indian
Penal Code and the Information Technology Act of 2000. The potential criminal penalties
faced range from two to five years imprisonment with fines as high as one Lakh Rupees
(approximately US $2,250.00).

Earlier this year, a similar civil suit has been filed against the same individuals by the
Hindu Temple of Georgia. The civil suit is asking the highest dollar amount in damages
ever from Google in India - “50 Crores of Indian Rupees,” (approximately US $10
Million).

According to a July 16th 2009, letter from A.P. Jayachandran, the temple’s legal advocate
in India, “if the accused do not appear in the Judicial Magistrate No. III of Coimbatore,
(Tamil Nadu, India on August 28th, 2009) arrest warrants will be issued.”

The US temple’s Chief Pundit, Viswanathan Lakshmanan, explained that the case stems
from Google’s refusal to edit, or delete, content on Blogspot.com and Youtube.com, two
websites owned by Google. The content is considered to be offensive and defamatory to
the Atharva Vedic religion practiced by the Hindu Temple of Georgia located near
Atlanta, which has temple operations in India.

The Criminal Case No. 36 of 2009 on file at the Judicial Magistrate No. III of
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, contends that Google profits monetarily from the
irresponsible and hasty electronic publishing of unverified facts and figures, and
defamatory slanders, that are part of a criminal conspiracy against the temple, and as such
it “amounts to Cyber Terrorism.” The case asserts that due to the International Law on
Cyber Space and Google maintaining a legal business entity in India, the American
Google owners also fall under Indian jurisdiction.

The leader of the Hindu Temple, Dr. Commander Selvam Siddhar, said recently that there
had been an ongoing effort to defame him and his temple by two Tamil speaking Indian-
American co-conspirators residing in Georgia, Valmiki Raghunathan and Chandramohan
Loganathan. In a 2006 Gwinnett County Police Incident Report Investigation, Mr.
Raghunathan admitted, “…that he was very upset…with Selvam.” He also told an Atlanta
Fox 5 television reporter that Dr. Commander “had just picked on the wrong person.”

The Hindu Temple suspects that the two have spent countless hours creating a fictitious
website for sending inflammatory emails, impersonating temple employees, and posting
thousands of scandalous, defamatory, and sometimes filthy blogs which were hurtful and
denigrating to the Temple and its founder.

In a letter earlier this year to the temple’s Indian attorney, Google implied that it was
protected in India by American style “free speech.” However according to A. P.
Jayachandran, “The learned Magistrate…was pleased to find out there is a Prima Facie
case against the accused…”