Você está na página 1de 2

1

Written by: B. Carroll


25th March 2008

Polar Discourse on the Stage of Human Rights.

This is a short review of two recent articlesposted in December 2007 in


the ‘On Line opinion’ e-journal. The first written piece is by George Williams
‘Human Rights Finally Take Centre Stage’ as developed from his University of
New South Wales Press book ‘A charter of Rights for Australia’. The second
article is written by Angelika Minner, ‘Rights of the terminally ill- a cause to
fight for’.

The latter piece by Minner is slamming the reader with a well rehearsed
biased rhetoric. Miner is a Chapter Coordinator of Exit International and she
has not hidden her personal interest and agenda in the debate of human
rights pertaining to Euthanasia and Self deliverance. Minner and The Exit
International organisation should employ the likes of the positive and
drawing logical prowess of an academic writer with the skill of George
Williams to aid their cause. Human Rights are an agenda that the entire
population of humanity should stand and unite for.

According to Williams ‘A charter could make a real difference to the


protection of human rights in Australia.’1 Williams seems to imply that
Australians at present are in adeficient state and lacking adequate human
rights protection. A reader of Williams article will automatically question,
‘Why and how are my rights not protected?’ Then optimistically declare this
must be rectified.

In Minner’s contrasting negative point of view in targeting the actions of the


previous Australian government, she has not brought to the reader a healthy
and optimistic platform to join the crusade of Exit International. Civil
disobedience is a legally dangerous course of action to publically insight.

In support of Exit International for their ‘moral imperative’2 to stand upon


their platform of human rights protection, the organisation is in need of the
imminent introduction of an Australian Human Rights Charter. But at that
time which rights are to be protected? William’s states that a Charter would

1
Williams, G. 2007, ‘Human Rights Finally take Centre Stage’, ON LINE opinion, 24 December,
2007. Viewed 19 March 2008.
2
Minner, A. 2007, ‘Rights of the Terminally Ill – A Cause to Fight For’, ON LINE opinion, 7
December, 2007. Viewed 19 March 2008.
2
Written by: B. Carroll
25th March 2008

create an Australian reference point against which to examine proposed laws


and that furthermore once a constitutional charter of human rights is
implemented this then gives a standard for current legislation to be reviewed
against also3. With Williams descriptive outline of the workings of a H.R.C
(Williams citing on other already introduced H.R.C’s internationally) a
question of whether or not the former Australian Federal Government would
have been able to overturn the Northern Territory’s Rights of the Terminally
Ill Act (ROTI) in 1997, which Minner claims has brought such anguish to many
older and terminally ill Australians4.

In Minner’s article she has highlighted an opinion where under a future


proposed Human Rights Charter of Australia there has been a potential
un-constitutional bill passed by the former Federal Parliament of Australia.
Where under the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 it is that the terminally ill and
elderly, people of Australia have been wrongly stripped of an elementary
5
human right, their right to die peacefully and with dignity .
Williams’s article has brought attention to a blanketing solution for a
multitude of human rights inadequacies with the implementing of a
Human Rights Charter in Australia’s Parliament and where a Human
Rights Charter would be ‘ensuring that fundamental principles of human
rights are taken into account at the earliest stages of the development of
6
law and policy.’ It follows that when a charter of human rights is
introduced the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 made by Federal Parliament
would be directed back to Federal parliament for review. Whereby to then
ensure that the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 is not legislation that acts
unconstitutionally against an Australian citizen and their human rights. A
Human Rights Charter will be a welcomed conventional sign, standing for
equality for the people of Australia.

3
Williams, op.cit
4
Minner, op.cit
5
Minner, op.cit
6
Williams, op.cit

Você também pode gostar