Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
00
REV. DATE N DATE
XX
XX XX
DESCRIZIONE DESCRIPTION EMESSO CONTROLLATO ISSUED BY CONTROLLED BY APPROVATO APPROVED BY
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
CALCULATION ASSUMPTION
1.1 SCOPE This report describes the calculation procedure and data considered in order to design the steel structure of the HEATER. 1.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS & DRAWINGS - Heater Assembly xx - Foundation Assembly / Details with loads 1.3 CALCULATION CODES - Uniform Building Code Volume 2 - Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures - Manual of steel construction - Allowable Stress Design - Specification for Structural Steel Buildings AISC 1.4 MATERIAL AND CODE ALLOWABLE VALUES Material used for the structures : Yield stress fy: 235 Minimum Tensile stress fu: 400 JIS SS4002or equivalent N/mm (thickness 16 mm) N/mm2 UBC-97 UBC-97 AISC ASD/01 360-05 xx
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2 2.1
LOAD CALCULATION
PRIMARY LOADS The decomposition of the loads into following primary loads :
- Structure Self-Weight - Extra Steelwork Weight - Platform - Refractory Loads - Pipe empty loads - Pipe Operating Loads - Hydrostatic test loads - Burners - Air Duct - Live Load 1 - Wind Load +X - Wind Load +Y - Earthquake Load +X - Earthquake Load +Y (SLF): (EXTSTEEL): (EXTPLTF): (REFRACT): (PPEMPT): (PPOPER) (PPTEST) (BURN): (ADUCT): (LL1): WLX WLY EQX EQY Weighs of the structural components automatically calculated by the program, and based on the model feature. Extra Steelwork weights not directly included in the model and not automatically calculated. Platform Extra Steelwork weights not directly included in the model and not automatically calculated. Weights of the refractory lining surfaces applied to the structural elements. Weights of all the operating pipes installed on the structure considered empty. Weights of the pipes filled with gas or liquid fluid as they are during the normal operation of the plant and load at terminal points. Weights of the pipes considered full of water as they are during the hydrostatic test conditions Weights of the burners applied to the radiant floor Weights of air duct installed on heater For the calculation of the foundation loads and structural analysis has been considered an overload of 500 Kg/m2 on each platforms. According to UBC-97 According to UBC-97 According to UBC-97 According to UBC-97 A thermal load has been considered on steel structures during normal operation according to spec n 00-ZA-E205001-rev.02 Tmax on frame = 47C Tmin on frame = 2C Tmax on furnace skin = 83C Tmin on furnace skin = 38C
- Thermal Load
TMP
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.2 2.2.1
External Radius Internal Radius support internal Radius External Diameter Internal surface diameter support internal diameter Floor thickness Overall Surface Floor surface weight burners supporting surface External surface Refractory (wet) Wet D.ty M.W.C. 1:2:4 Thickness 75 Wet D.ty VLWC 1:0:5 Thickness 125 A 1.2 Burners Weight of each burner considered number of burners Overall burners weight
9,06 KN
450 6
Kg
2700 Kg 27,00KN
A 1.3 Steelwork Extra steelwork not modelled Extra steelwork weight Input Sap Data
7,69 KN
Overall floor weight Internal surface Overall refractory weight distribuited on surface Overall steelwork weight distribuited on surface Overall burners weight distributed on surface KN/m2 KN/m2 2,97 0,4 3,31
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
142,9 5609,1
56,1 323,7
KN KN
1400 1215
Kg/m3 mm Kg/m3 mm
Overall refractory weight distribuited on surface Overall steelwork weight distribuited on surface
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
905,7
9,1
KN
7,1 12,11
mm mm m2 m2 31,105 KN
20,00 242,2
KN KN REFRACT EXTSTEEL
Overall refractory weight added to arch surface Overall steelwork weight added to arch surface
2,57 0,20
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.2.2
Type of fuel Bare tubes O.D: Bare tubes thickness Bare tubes I.D. Maximum Operating fluid density Water density for hydrostatic test Pipe weight per meter Operating fluid weight per meter on each pipe Water weight per meter inside each pipe Number of tubes on each anchor Medium pipe lenght Return bends medium diameter Number of return bends on each anchor Bends unit weight Operating fluid on each return bend Water weight on each return bend Pipe empty weight on each anchor (2 tube + 2 bend) Pipe weight with operating fluid on each anchor (2 tube + 2 bend) Pipe full weight on each anchor (2 tube + 2 bend) Crossing Tubes Number of crossing tubes Medium pipe lenght Empty crossing tubes weight Operating crossing tube weight (pipes + Op. fluid) Test crossing tube weight (pipes + water) Anchor number Total number of tubes on each anchor Total number of bends on each anchor Overall empty weight Overall operating weight (Pipe + Operating fluid) Overall test weight (Pipe + water)
4,0 2,248 m 195,7 Kg 260,3 Kg 311,8 Kg 24,0 48,0 48,0 8761,6 Kg 11650,5 Kg 116,5 13957,4 Kg 139,6 87,6 KN KN KN KN KN KN PPEMPT PPOPER PPTEST
Point empty weight applied on each anchor (ELEV. 19050) Point operating weight applied on each anchor (ELEV. 19050) Point test weight applied on each anchor (ELEV. 19050)
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.2.3
Convection cell
683,7
6,8 36,6
KN KN
1400
Kg/m3 mm
20,00 348,4
Overall convection wall weight (2X) Overall refractory weight distributed each surface Overall steelwork weight added to each surface
527,1
5,3 7,2
KN KN
1400
Kg/m3 mm
1,0 20 Kg/m2 tot. weight of each End Tube Sheet Overall End Tube Sheet weight 13,5 27,1 1,40 0,20
Overall refractory weight added to each E.T.S. surface Overall steelwork weight added each E.T.S. surface
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
5,0 411,4
mm Kg
4,1 7,3
KN KN
1400
50 Kg/m2 tot. weight of each Header Box Overall Header Boxes weight
Overall refractory weight distributed on each E.T.S. surf. Overall steelwork weight distributed on each E.T.S. surf.
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
10
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Kg/m3 Kg/m3 mm mm mm m
mm
21,76 Kg/m 7,17 Kg/m 12,90 Kg/m 8,68 Kg/each 2,86 Kg/each 5,14 Kg/each 5350 Kg 53,50 KN
STUDDED SURFACE AROUND CONVECTIVE COIL 25,40 mm Stud height Studs diameter 12,70 mm studs per meter 1260 stud /m Number of bare tubes not finned Number of studded tubes 28 5,026 m studded surface length (on each tube) 0,001013 m2 exposed surface of each stud studded exposed surface of each tube 6,414 m2 total exposed surface calculated (studs+ tubes) 242,04 m2 4476,4 Kg 44,76 Weight of studded surface Overall empty coil weight Overall Operating coil weight (tube + Op. fluid) Overall test coil weight (tube + water) 9826 11590 12998 Kg Kg Kg 98,26 115,90 129,98 KN KN KN
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
11
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Height of End Tube Sheet portion Width of End Tube Sheet portion Heading surface with coil weight distributed Overall empty tube weight distributed on each convection header surfaces Overall Operating weight distributed on each convection header surfaces (tube + Op. Fluid) Overall test weight distributed on each convection header surfaces (tube + water)
2.2.4
Breeching
C.1 BREECHING Base lenght 4900 mm Base width 1453 mm plate thickness 5 mm Overall SAP surface 10,2 m2
C.1.1 Refractory (wet) Wet D.ty LWC 1:2:4 Thickness 75 Overall breeching refractory weight
1400 1071
Kg/m3 mm Kg
10,71
KN
C.1.4 Steelwork not modelled Steelwork not modelled 30Kg/m2 Overall steelwork not modelled weight 306Kg
3,06 KN
Overall breeching refractory weight distributed on modelled surface1,05 Overall breeching steelwork weight distributed on modelled surface0,30
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
12
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.2.5
309,66 Kg 1146,88
3,10 11,47
KN 2 KN 2
0,84 3,13
Plant
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
13
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Dimension
Angle ( )
Surface m2 27,42 load on load on middle external beam beam KN/m KN/m 1,07 0,80
Plant
3701,77 Kg Kg 13710,24
37,02
KN 2
137,10
KN 2
3,96 2,96
Dimension
Surface m2 5,79
781,38 Kg
7,81
KN
0,52
2894,00
28,94
KN
1,92
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
14
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Nr of portion consid. Dead Load on Plant platform at 0 Dead Load on Plant platform at 90 Dead Load on Plant platform at 180 Dead Load on Plant platform at 270 952,81 264,61 952,81 264,61 Kg Kg Kg Kg 9,53 2,65 9,53 2,65 KN 1 KN 1 KN 1 KN 1
Live load on Plant platform at 0 Live load on Plant platform at 90 Live load on Plant platform at 180 Live load on Plant platform at 270
Kg Kg Kg Kg
KN 1 KN 1 KN 1 KN 1
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
15
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Kg/m 80
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
16
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.2.6
WIND LOAD according toUBC-97 P = Ce*Cq*qs*Iw EXPOSURE Pressure coefficient on cilindrical surfaces Cq = Site elevation Basic wind speed V = wind stagnation pressure suggested for site elevation qs = Importance factor Iw =
D 0,8 19-25 m 44,4 1,30E-03 Mpa 1,15 (hazardous facilities) m/s According to spec. Nr. 00-ZA-E205001 rev.2 According to spec. Nr. 00-ZA-E205001 rev.2 1,30 KN/m2
Ce
Specific Pressure on portion p(z) kN/m2 KN 1,77 35,0 1,94 49,8 2,05 50,2 2,19 34,4 2,31 36,2
Wind Load
Total Wind X 243,18 KN INPUT SAP DATA Intermediate Portion columns Radiant 1 Radiant 1 Convection 2 Stack I 0 Stack II 0 Stack III 0
wind load distributed 4,38 2,19 4,79 2,40 3,34 1,67 3,44 3,62 3,75
load case WX WX WX WX WX WX
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
17
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
1,48 1,62 1,71 1,83 1,93 2 2,39 37,5 Total Wind Y Weight
207,89 KN
INPUT SAP DATA Portion Radiant Radiant Convection Stack I Stack II Stack III Intermediate columns 2 2 1 0 0 0 UNIT KN/m KN/m KN/m KN/m KN/m KN/m wind load distributed 2,92 1,46 3,20 1,60 1,49 3,44 3,62 3,75 wind load distributed ext. Columns load case WY WY WY WY WY WY
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
18
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.2.7
Earthquake load according to UBC-97 Sismic Zone Seismic zone factor Z Solid Profile Ca 0,40 Cv 0,56 I 1,25 R 4,5 4 0,4 SC
Notes According to spec. nr. 00-ZA-E-205001 rev.02 According to table 16-I of UBC-97 According to customer data According to table 16-Q of UBC-97 and for customer request According to table 16-R of UBC-97 and for customer request According to table 16-K Hazardous facilities for toxic and explosives material According to table 16-N of UBC-97 Moment Resisting Frame systems OMRF Steel
Note: In order to calculate the earthquake effect on the structure, the previous data have been assigned as input data to the model in SAP 2000 program and the effect of the earthquake as base reaction, structure elements deformation and vertical distribution of the lateral forces have been calculated automatically. According to UBC- 97 the automatic calculation of the elastic fundamental period of vibration (performed by SAP 2000) is based on following formulation based on method A:
3/4 T = C t * (hn ) = 0,802 s
(*)
where: Ct = 0,0853 is the coefficient for the calculation of steel moment-resisting frames hn = is the height of the structure above the base (m) from this value of T it is automatically calculated the total design base shear according to: C *I* V = v W R* T where W is the total weight of the structure.
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
19
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
According to UBC 97, the base shear so calculated has to respect the following limits: 2.5 * Ca * I The value of base shear shall not exceed the value VMAX = *W R The value of base shear shall not be less than VMIN = 0.11* Ca * I * W 0,8* ZN * v I* For seismic zone 4 the value of base shear shall also not be less than VMINZ4 = W R Following are listed the values calculated for the heater in the different condition of work:
Work condition
Total Total base weight shear Vtot considered KN KN KN KN KN 1680 326 467 92.4 149.3 1748 341 485.6 96.16 155.4 1772 344 492.2 97.5 157.5 1937 379 538 106.5 172.2
VMAX
VMIN V
MIN-Z4
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
20
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.2.8
Stack
Stack portion I
Casing and Refractory Height 10000 External diameter Shell thickness Lateral External surface Casing Weight Refractory LWC Refractory D.ty Thickness 50 Overall refractory weight Extra steel-work not modelled Safety margin Unit Weight Overall Extra Steelwork Weight Base skirt / flange weight Total base skirt weight 20 Kg/m2 988,5 Kg 9,9 KN 1400 Kg/m3 mm 3406,9 Kg mm 1574 mm 12 mm 49,42 m2 4620,2 Kg 46,20 KN
34,1 KN
885,25 Kg
8,85 KN
Intermediate stiffening rings weight Number of A-75x75x9 stiffening rings on portion 4 A-75x75x9 weight per meter 9,96 Kg/m Total A-75x75x9 stiffening rings weight 196,90 Kg
1,97 KN
Overall Stack portion weight Overall Steelwork weight distributed along stack span Overall refractory weight distributed along portion span Point skirt weight at stack base
KN KN/m KN/m KN
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
21
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Stack portion II
Casing and Refractory Height 10000 External diameter Shell thickness Lateral External surface Casing Weight Refractory LWC Refractory D.ty Thickness 50 Overall refractory weight Extra steel-work not modelled Safety margin Unit Weight Overall Extra Steelwork Weight Base skirt / flange weight Total base skirt weight 20 Kg/m2 986,0 Kg 9,9 KN 1400 Kg/m3 mm 3406,9 Kg mm 1570 mm 10 mm 49,30 m2 3845,2 Kg 38,45 KN
34,1 KN
447,05 Kg
4,47 KN
Intermediate stiffening rings weight Number of A-75x75x9 stiffening rings on portion 4 A-75x75x9 weight per meter 9,96 Kg/m Total A-75x75x9 stiffening rings weight 196,40 Kg
1,96 KN
Overall Stack portion weight Overall Steelwork weight distributed along stack span Overall refractory weight distributed along portion span Point skirt weight at stack base
KN KN/m KN/m KN
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
22
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
34,1 KN
443,59 Kg
4,44 KN
0,00 Kg Kg Kg
0,00 KN KN KN
Intermediate stiffening rings weight Number of A-75x75x10 stiffening rings on portion 4 A-75x75x10 weight per meter 9,96 Kg/m Total A-75x75x10 stiffening rings weight 195,90 Kg
1,96 KN
Overall Stack portion weight Overall Steelwork weight distributed along stack span Overall refractory weight distributed along portion span Point skirt weight at stack base
KN KN/m KN/m KN
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
23
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Portion
From Elev.
To Elev.
Portion height mm
27200 1550 1450 12 1574 10000 A-75x75x9 4 37200 1550 1450 10 1570 10000 A-75x75x9 4 47200 1550 1450 8
1566
10000
A-75x75x10
Base & connecting flanges dimensions Rectangular stiffness Portion Internal Plate diameter mm I II III 1574 1570 1566 External plate diameter mm Lower plate thickness Upper plate thickness Nr. Of stiffness on plate Stiffness Height of thickness stiffness mm 0 0 mm 30 28
Triangular stiffness Nr. Of stiffness on plate Stiffness Height of thickness stiffness mm 8 8 mm 250 250
Flanges at base of Portion Bolts nominal diameter Bolts number Bolt circle diameter M I 30 II 27 III 24 36 30 28 mm 2060 1662 1662
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
24
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
According to what written in the previous paragraphs, the stack here described has the following characteristics:
Portion Thickness
Corroded Thickness
Portion Length
Lateral Surface
Casing Weight
mm mm I 12 10 II 10 8 III 8 6
mm m Kg 10000 49,4 4620,2 10000 49,3 3845,2 10000 49,2 3072,3 Total 30000 147,9 11537,7
Lining thickness = 50 mm
Refractory weight calculation Portion Refractory Density Portion lenght with refractory Refractory Thickness Refractory Weight Kg/m mm I 1400,0 10000,0 50,0 3406,9 II 1400,0 10000,0 50,0 3406,9 III 1400,0 10000,0 50,0 3406,9 mm Kg
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
25
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Max. Height of stack: 30 m The values above listed do not consider the effect of the corrosion on the stack walls. The corrosion on the walls it will be considered later.
Material considered for Stack: Overall Stack Height considered = Young modulus E = Yield stress for the material fy = Lining Thickness = Lining density = JIS SS400 30 m 200000 N/mm 235 N/mm 50 mm 1400 Kg/m
Overall casing lateral surface Overall Casing weight Overall lining weight Overall extra weight for Equipments appended: Overall extra steelwork, stiffening and flanges weight Total platform surface considered Overall structural platform weight Live load considered on each platform surface Overall non permanent live load Overall ladder length Overall ladder weight Overall stack permanent weight Overall weight with 33% of live load Maximum resulting shear at stack base Maximum resulting moment at stack base
147,9 m 115,38 KN 102,21 KN 0 KN 53,23 KN 0 m 0 KN 2 KN/m 0 KN 0m 0 KN 270,82 KN 270,82 KN 108,8 KN 1660,08 KMn
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
26
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
The design procedure described in this paragraph is written according to chapter 10 of the book : Process Equipment Design Written by: L.E. Brownell and E.H. Young Publisher: Wiley Publishing Bearing plate thickness assumed t4 = Compression plate thickness assumed t5 = Gusset plate thickness assumed t6 = Base plate outer diameter De = Base plate bolt circle diameter Db = Base plate inner diameter Di = Minimum vertical load on base plate Nmin = Maximum vertical load on base plate Nmin = Maximum shear load at stack base Vmax = Maximum resulting moment at stack base Mmax = Number of bolts on base plate nb = Nominal diameter of anchor bolts db = Resistance section of anchor bolts Ares = Safety coefficient on yield stress n= Admissible stress for parts resistance check adm = Max load on anchor bolts is given by: Nb =(-Nmin/nb)+(4Mmax/Nb*Db) = 30 mm 25 mm 12 mm 2074 mm 2060 mm 1574 mm 270,82 KN 270,82 KN 108,8 KN 1660,08 KNm 36 30 mm 561 mm 1,5 156,67 N/mm
82,02 KN
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
27
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
thickness of bearing plate tb = (6*Mmax/ adm)0,5 = 29,6 Where Mmax is calculated with the formulas: Mmax = c1* b*b2 = Mmax = c2* b*b2 = 14,53 KNcm 22,82 KNcm
the value of tb has to be checked where the bolts are located In order to do this the maximum bolt load P is given by the formula: P = sb*Ab = 87,9 KN Where b is the maximum stress admissible on bolts The Maximum bending moment supported by bolts is given by: Mmax = P*b/8 = 329,59 KN/cm The bearing plate thickness calculated with the considerations above is:
0,5 tb=(6*Mmax/(lt-bhd)* = adm)
24,2 mm
Where: lt : overall bearing plate width = 250 mm bhd :bolt hole diameter in bearing plate = 33 mm
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
28
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Maximum bending moment acting on compression plate Maximum bolt load calculated above Radial distance from outside of skirt to outer edge of compression plate One-half distance across flats of bolting nuts = 23 mm Constant = 0,472 (by interpolation)
The thickness of the compression plate is: tc =(6*Mymax/sigma_amm)0,5 = 24,7 mm THICKNESS t5 ASSUMED VERIFIED
is the width of the gussets (inches) is the height of the gussets (inches) is the thickness of the gussets (inches) is the Maximum value of bolt load calculated (lbs)
According to the values above listed the minimum thickness required for the gussets is: tg = 6,25 mm THICKNESS t6 ASSUMED VERIFIED
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
29
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
INTERMEDIATE RING FLANGES STRESS CHECK Flange Stress Check The procedure considered for the stress check of the flanges is the following: The maximum pressure on flange due to vertical load is given by: P = P pmax V = 2 2 D pe D pi Af 4 The uniform load on middle flange diameter due to P mas-V is given by:
()
D pe D pi q p max V = pmax V 2 Assuming that the neutral axis for maximum moment passes from the section axis and assuming that the highest pressure value is located on bolt circle diameter, the maximum pressure on flange due to wind is given by: M M Max pmax W = Max = 2 2 D pe D pi Dcb A f Dcb 2 Assuming that this pressure is uniformly distributed on compressed side of the flange it can be calculated the uniform load on middle flange diameter due to this pressure: D pe D pi q p max W = 2 pmax W 2 Where: P: is the maximum vertical load calculated at the base of the section considered Mmax is the maximum moment calculated at the base of the section considered Dpe & Dpi are the Outside and the Inside flange diameters Dcb is the Bolt Circle diameter
()
the worst load combination is given in the position where the two loads add one to the other: qmax = q p max V + q p max W With the geometry assumed it follows that the distance between the stiffness on bolt circle diameter is given by: D bmax = cb t s Ns
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
30
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
where: ts Ns
Now each flange can be assumed as a beam simply supported in the position where it joins to the stiffness, so the maximum moment calculated between the two supports is given by: 2 qmax bmax = Mf 8 The stress check of the flange is verified if = Mf where: tf Mf 2 adm f bmax t f 6 is the thickness of the flange (assumed)
In order to check the maximum stress of the stiffness placed on each flange they are calculated the maximum shear load and the maximum moment acting at the base of each stiffness. In order to do this, the flange is considered as a beam uniformly loaded and supported by each stiffness. From this consideration the maximum reaction and the maximum moment calculated under the stiffness are given by the equations: 1 1 2 Rmax s = qmax bmax M max s = qmax bmax 2 12 From these values it is easy to calculate the maximum shear and bending stresses: 6 M max Rmax max s = max s = 2 hs t s t s hs where: ts is the thickness of the stiffness (assumed) hs is the height of the stiffness (assumed) The stress of the stiffness is verified if
2 2 = max s + 3 max s id s adm f
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
31
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Following are listed all the geometric data and the resulting value calculated according to the procedure above described.
Flange at base of Stack External portion DIA Dext mm mm mm mm mm2 mm II 1570 III 1566 Stack Shell Thk ts Flange Outside Dia Dpe Flange inside Dia Dpi Flange circular surface Af Flange thk tf
10 8
1890 1886
1570 1566
869152 867142,4
30 30
Section Bolt Circle diameter Nr. of stiffness on interm. flange Stiffness Height Stiffness Thk Dcb Ns hs ts mm mm mm II 1662 30 250 8 III 1662 28 250 8 Uniform load Max moment at Max on middle section base due pressure on Section diameter due to wind or flange due to to vertical earthquake vertical load load PMax Mmax Pmax-V qpmax-V KN KNm N/mm2 N/mm II 169,84 746,24 0,20 31,26 0,52 82,66 113,92 III 81,02 188,20 0,09 14,95 0,13 20,89 35,84 Max Vertical load on flange Max uniform load pressure on on middle flange due diameter due to wind to wind Pmax-W N/mm2 qpmax-W N/mm Max uniform load on flange qmax N/mm
Section distance between the stiffness Max Bending moment on flange Max stress on flange Check bmax mm II 189,46 0,51 17,99 III 203,06 0,18 6,07 Section Max reaction Max moment under stiffness under stiffness Rmax-s Mmax-s KN KNm II 26,98 0,29 3,45 13,49 23,62 OK III 9,10 0,10 1,25 4,55 7,98 OK Mf KNm sMf N/mm2 OK OK Max bending Max shear stress Max ideal stress Check stress on Stiffness on Stiffness on Stiffness smax-s tmax-s sid-s N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
32
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Flange bolts stress check The flange bolts considered in the following procedures are in class 8.8 with the following values for admissible stress: 2 adm-b = 373 N/mm 2 adm-b = 264 N/mm The procedure considered for the stress check of the flange bolts is the following: The maximum axial load on each bolt is given by the difference of the axial load due to bending moment at the base of each section and the minimum vertical load calculated in the same section. The maximum axial load on worst stressed bolt is given by: 4 M max N min FN b = nb Dcb nb From this follows that the highest axial stress on bolts is given by: FN b max b = Ares The maximum shear stress on each bolt is given by: Vmax max b = Ares nb where: Nmin is the minimum vertical load calculated at the base of the section considered Vmax is the maximum shear load calculated at the base of the section considered is the maximum bending moment calculated at the base of the section Mmax considered Dcb is the bolt circle diameter nb is the total number of bolts considered on the flange Ares is the resistance section of the bolts considered The bolt are verified if
2 2 = max b + 3 max b id b adm b
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
33
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
The data and the results of the procedure applied to each intermediate flange are following listed:
Stack Ext. Dia. Stack Shell thk. Nr. of bolts on interm. flange Nb mm Bolt Bolt hole dia. Bolt Bolt resistance circle dia. on flange nominal Dia. section Db mm db mm M 0 Ares mm2
Section
Section
PMin VMax Mmax KN KN KNm II 169,8 74,0 746,2 54,2 118,1 5,4 118,5 III 81,0 37,6 188,2 13,3 37,6 3,8 38,2 OK
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
34
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
CHECK OF CASING
With reference to the stack structure section, considering that the ratio between diameter (D) and thickness (t) is very high, in the following they will be used simplified formulas:
A = *D*t W = (*D2*t)/4 I = (*D3*t)/8 Specific data for resistance check (thickness of corrosion = 2 mm) External Wall thickness Portion A W corroded corroded diameter 3 mm mm cm cm cm I 10 1570 493 19.359 II 8 1566 394 15.409 III 6 1562 294 11.497
I
4
The overall structure stability value does not consider possible allowances due to fabrication, while the possible corrosion allowance value is deducted at checks of resistance. VERIFICATION Check on stability are performed in connection with admissible compression stresses, as per API 560 Par. 9.3. Admissible compression stress is the minimum value between: adm-1 = 0,5*Fy = 11,75 N/mm or adm-2 = 0,56*E*t/(D*(1+(0,004*E/Fy))) With values defined as follows: t= is the corroded shell plate thickness (mm) D = is the outside stack diameter (mm) E = 200000 N/mm is the Elastic Young Modulus Fy = 235 N/mm :is the material minimum yield strength at design temperature
Following are listed the data considered in order to check the stress status of each shell section. The value of stress on each section is calculated with the vertical load coming from the weight calculation of each section considered with thickness corroded
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
35
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Portion
From Elevation
To Elevation
adm-2 KN/cm2
Check
mm mm KN KNm I 17200 27200 271 1.660 9,124 16,20 II 27200 37200 170 746 5,275 12,99 III 37200 47200 81
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
36
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Portion
From Elevation
To Elevation
Internal Diameter
Stiffening Spacing
fr fv
fr/2fv Check
RINGS NOT
RINGS NOT
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
37
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
2.3
LOADING COMBINATIONS
The following main loads have been considered Deads = SLF + ADUCT + BURN + EXTPLTF + EXTSTEEL + REFRACT ERECT = Deads + PPEMPT OPER = Deads + PPOPER TEST = Deads + PPTEST LT = TMP + LIVE1 Live Load LIVE1 Wind Load +X WLX Wind Load +Y WLY Earthquake Load +X EQX Earthquake Load +Y EQY Thermal Load TMP
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
38
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
39
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
40
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3
3.1
STRUCTURE SYSTEM
THE MODEL
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
41
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2 3.2.1
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
42
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2.2
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
43
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2.3
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
44
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2.4
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
45
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2.5
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
46
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2.6
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
47
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2.7
C-150x75
LL-150x100
A-75x6
H-200x200
2A-90x10
C-200x80
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
48
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.2.8
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
49
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3 3.3.1
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
50
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3.2
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
51
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3.3
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
52
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3.4
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
53
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3.5
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
54
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3.6
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
55
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3.7
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
56
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
3.3.8
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
57
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
The Steel Structure is checked in accordance with ASC-ASD-1989. Automatic members check is carried out by means of SAP 2000 Steel Stress Check according ASC-ASD-1989 . Structural checks and frame analysis are based on 3-d structure model. The bars and the shells elements ave been designed for the worst loading combination cases.
5
5.1
5.1.1 Base Plates stress check calculation procedure In order to check the worst stress status of the plates at the base of the structure columns the following procedure has to be performed. The calculation of the maximum stress on the concrete plinths is performed considering the value of the eccentricity calculated as ratio between the value of the moment acting at the base of the columns (M) and the compression load perpendicular to the base plate (N). M e= N The value of this ratio detects the position of the neutral axis with respect to the kernel of inertia of the section calculated as sixth part of the plate dimension perpendicular to the axis of the moment considered (a) as shown in the following picture (where the load N has not to be considered as a shear load but only an image for the position of the perpendicular load):
Picture 1
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
58
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
According to the value of e calculated, the two following conditions have to be considered: Condition 1 for calculation of maximum stress on plinth: a : eccentricity internal to the kernel of inertia 6 in this case the plinth can be assumed to be forced by only a compression load, so the maximum compression stress on plinth is calculated as follows: = N +M c Ac Wc where: Ac : is the section area of the cement plinth Wc: is the elastic modulus of the plinth For conservative reasons both the geometric characteristics above listed are calculated considering the plinth with same dimensions and section of the base plate. The stress of the maximum compression on plinth is verified if : 0,44 * Rck c where Rck is the cubic admissible resistance of the concrete considered. e From the value of c, it is calculated for proportion the value of the stress acting on the base plate in correspondence of the section column flanges or stiffeners:
c
x
s
xs
= s
c x a s 2
where assuming the neutral axis passing from the middle of the section: s xs is the value of sigma at stiffeners level is the distance between stiffeners and neutral axis
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
59
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Condition 2 for calculation of maximum stress on plinth: e> a : eccentricity 6 external to the kernel of inertia
this condition forces to the research of the position of the real neutral axis. The value of the position of the neutral axis is found by attempts with the following empirical equation: b 3 + bd 2 + x x nAf (d + h) x nAf h(d + h) = 0 6 2 Where (ref. to picture 1): b is the plate dimension parallel to the moment axis x is the position of the neutral axis with respect to the base edge d is the position of perpendicular load with respect the plate edge n = 15 is the homogenization coefficient between elastic modulus Af = Ab*nb is the total area of the bolts strengthen h is the distance between the base edge and the axis of the anchor bolts strengthen Once that the value of x is calculated the value of the maximum sigma acting on the cement plinth is calculated with the formula: = c b N *x x nAf (h x) 2
2
The stress of the maximum compression on plinth is verified if : 0,44 * Rck c where Rck is the cubic admissible resistance of the concrete considered. From the value of c, it is calculated for proportion the value of the stress acting on the base plate in correspondence of the section column flanges or stiffness:
c
x
s
xs
= s
c
x
xs
where (ref. to picture 1): is the value of sigma at stiffness level s is the distance between stiffness and neutral axis xs = x- m1
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
60
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Base Plate stress calculation Once that the values of c and s have been calculated from one of the procedures above described the stress check of the base plate continues as follows for both the conditions: The base plate is now considered as a beam rigidly joined at level of stiffness and uniformly loaded by a load q calculated as follows: + s q = m1* c 2 The maximum momentum given by this kind of restraint is: 2 2 q * l 2 q * m2 = M Max 8 2 where l2 is the intermediate distance between the base plate stiffeners m2 is the distance between the flange of the column section and the plate edge The Maximum sigma acting on the flange is: = M Max = p W M Max 2 m1 * thk 6
Where: W is the resistance modulus of the section considered. thk is the thickness of the plate (assumed) Note: The procedures above described are referred to a moment with axis parallel to direction 2. In the case in which the moment considered is directed as axis 1 the related values of geometric dimensions as a, b, l, m etc have to be considered. In order to take into account the effect of both the moments acting at the base of the column, the procedures above described are performed considering one at time both the moments acting on the two main direction of the section. The value of stress so found it has to be lower than the admissible stress calculated as ratio between the yield stress of the material considered for the base plate and a safety coefficient. If the stress is verified the thickness assumed has not to be increased.
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
61
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
5.1.2
Plinth
Comb.
Fn KN 950,4
F1 KN 60,7
F2 KN -15,1
M1 KNm 5,8
M2 KNm 25,4
CB7O
Yield Stress of the material JIS SS400 = Admissible stress of the base plate material = Cement Plinth cubic resistance Rck = Admissible stress on cement plinth = Base Plate thickness assumed = Considered 8 bolts M30
235 N/mm 235 / 1,5 = 156,67 N/mm 21 N/mm 21 * 0,44 = 9,24 N/mm 35 mm
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
62
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Action dominant
M1 M2
eccentricity case
Distance Distance Total of between Nr. of bolts resistance normal bolts Action strengthen section of force strengthen dominant on last row bolts from and plate (nb) strengthen edge edge (Af) (d) (h) mm 0 0 mm 3 3 mm 1683 1683 mm 425 425 Sigma on stiffeness for proportion ( f) N/mm 2,37 2,12
Distance between Neutral axis and plate edge (x) mm 0 0 uniform load on plate portion (q) N/mm 529,47 556,44
M1 M2
Distance Distance between between stiffness stiffness and plate and plate edge edge parallel perp. to to moment moment (m2) (l1) mm mm 138 150 150 138 Resistance module with respect to the moment (Wp) mm 28175,00 30625,00
Action dominant
M1 M2
Action dominant
Sigma on base plate for Moment Sigma resultant from both moment effect ( action ( p) max)
M1 M2
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
63
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
5.2 5.2.1
ANCHOR BOLTS CHECK Anchor bolts on plinth A B C D E F according to Chapter J of AISC-350-05 In order to perform the check resistance of the bolts following are listed the calculation made for the load combinations that make the higher stress on bolts in condition of maximum and minimum axial load, moment and resulting shear. According to this in order to calculate the axial and shear stress on worst stressed bolt the following equations have been considered: Axial load on bolt due to Fn (in strength condition) f t Fn = Axial load due to moment in X direction Axial load due to moment in Y direction Overall axial load on bolt Overall Shear Load Shear Load Acting on each bolt: Required Shear stress on each bolt: Where: nb : Ab : ymax / xmax: yi / xi: nbx / nby: f t Mx = ft M y =
() nb Ab
M x * ymax 2 nbx * Ab * yi M y * xmax
Fn
2 nby * Ab * xi f nt = f t Fn + f t Mx + f t My
2 2 Vtot = Vx + V y
V Vb = tot nb V f nv = b Ab
overall number of bolts Resistance section of each bolt Distance between the plate edge and the farest bolt line parallel to x / y axis Distance between the plate edge and each bolt line parallel to x / y axis number of bolts on the farest bolt line parallel to x / y axis
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
64
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Once that the axial and shear stresses on bolt are calculated as previous described the design procedure (according to Chapter J of AISC-350-05) can be applied as follows: Design procedure according to Chapter J of AISC-350-05 Specified minimum tensile strength of the type of steel being used F u = 400 N/mm2 Nominal tensile Stress acc. AISC 350 cap.J Fnt = 0,75*Fu = 300 N/mm2 Nominal shear Stress acc. AISC 350 cap.J Fnv = 0,4*Fu= 160 N/mm2 For tensile stress check the values are: Ra = fnt * Ab ' ' is the nominal tensile stress modified to include the effects of shearing stress Fn = Fnt calculated with the equation: F = Fnt
' nt
f nv 1 Fnv
For combined tension and shear actions it has to be: Ra Rn = Fn Ab Where: Ra : is the required strength (ASD) is nominal strength Rn =2 is the safety factor (ASD)
'
Total bolt number Nominal bolt diameter Section resistance Specified minimum tensile strength of the type of steel being used Fu = Nominal tensile Stress acc. AISC 350 cap.J Fnt =0,75*Fu Nominal shear Stress acc. AISC 350 cap.J Fnv =0,4*Fu
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
65
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
According to the procedure above described following are listed the values calculated with the load combination that makes higher status of axial, moment and shear on anchor bolts:
Plinth Combo Combination with Max vertical load at base Combination with Min vertical load at base Combination with Max moment Mx at base Combination with Min moment Mx at base Combination with Max moment My at base Combination with Min moment My at base Combination with Max resulting shear at base F CB7O C CB11O A CB15OT D CB21OT
FN KN
-24,7 F CB15OT 840,3 68,3 -14,4 840,3 32,7 C CB14OT 724,7 -47,7 3,6 -1,4 -27,5 F CB19OT860,39 71,70 -15,21 5,87 32,25
FX FY MX MY Max base shear KN KN KN-m KN-m KN 60,7 -15,1 5,8 25,4 62,5 51,3 4,8 -1,8 24,8 51,6 25,5 -6,7 45,0 9,8 49,3 69,8 47,8 73,30
nominal tensile stress modified to include the effects of shearing stress F'nt
required strength Ra
N/mm KN N/mm N/mm N/mm Plinth Combo 31,7 62,5 13,9 295,4 17771,4 F CB7O 124,8 51,6 11,5 296,9 70001,7 C CB11O 32,8 45,0 10,0 297,6 18373,5 A CB15OT 35,0 49,3 11,0 297,2 19636,2 D CB21OT 38,8 69,8 15,6 294,3 21787,6 F CB15OT 29,4 47,8 10,6 297,3 16487,3 C CB14OT 38,7 73,3 16,3 293,7 21709,6 F CB19OT
N/mm
82865,5 83278,0 83485,9 83353,0 82544,4 83401,1 82377,9
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
66
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6
6.1
RESULTS ANALYSIS
LOAD FOUNDATIONS
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
67
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.2 DISPLACEMENTS CHECKING 6.2.1 Max Horizontal Joint displacement Maximum horizontal displacement: Column height: 5005 Load Combination: CB6E Joint : 803 7.56 mm
Allowable displacement checking for column height: h0/500 = 5050/500 = 10.01 mm > 7.56 OK
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
68
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.2.2
Max deflection of beam Maximum deflection : Beam Span (L): Load Combination: Beam number : -6.63 mm 1800 CB10 572
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
69
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3
STRESS CHECKING In the following pictures are the Design Stress Ratios Topography per line provided SAP. These ratios correspond to the design stress in the bars over the allowable stress.
6.3.1
Maximum stress in main elements Here below the maximum stress ratios in the main structural elements
Frame DesignSect DesignType Combo TotalRatio
211 C-150X75 Beam CB17O 0,970 112 H-200X200 Column CB3O 0,954 418 2A-75X9 Brace CB15OT
0,926
Here below the computer output detailed structural calculations of the main elements with the maximum stress above mentioned.
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
70
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.2
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
71
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.3
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
72
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.4
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
73
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.5
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
74
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.6
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
75
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.7
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
76
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.8
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
77
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
6.3.9
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
78
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
COMMESSA/Job N:
XX
DIS./Dwg n :
XX
CLIENTE/Client :
XX
PAG./Page :
79
DI/of 79
IMPIANTO/Plant :
XX
REV. 00
DATA/Date:
XX
Table: Steel Design 2 - PMM Details - AISC-ASD01 Frame DesignSect DesignType Combo TotalRatio PRatio MMajRatio MMinRatio 211 C-150X75 Beam CB17O 0,970486 0,033793 1456 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,965219 0,161650 112 H-200X200 Column CB3O 0,953768 0,756447 0,196224 0,001097 600 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,953275 0,165027 604 A-75X6 Beam CB5O 0,943607 0,084699 624 A-75X6 Beam CB15OT 0,942381 0,132440 1401 A-75X6 Beam CB15OT 0,937742 0,202521 1493 A-75X6 Beam CB16OT 0,937390 0,204937 421 C-150+A-90 Beam CB16OT 0,935003 0,035953 0,505647 0,393404 1478 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,929110 0,147188 571 2A-90X10 Column CB5O 0,926956 0,358888 418 2A-75X9 Brace CB15OT 0,925765 0,034595 1480 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,924432 0,147620 580 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,923496 0,147784 649 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,919039 0,033808 53 H-200X200 Column CB17OT 0,917472 0,472758 374 A-75X6 Beam CB1E 0,912147 0,042444 648 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,909268 0,030118 182 H-200X200 Beam CB2T 0,908771 0,047580 0,860007 0,001183 1483 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,908534 0,211617 256 H-200X200 Beam CB2T 0,903900 0,046547 0,856190 0,001163 1499 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,901629 0,195460 426 C-150+A-90 Beam CB1OT 0,897453 0,047167 0,332158 0,518128 55 H-200X200 Column CB2T 0,896269 0,674066 1454 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,894490 0,121424 1462 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,892025 0,127468 222 H-200X200 Beam CB3O 0,891576 0,046060 0,844568 0,000948 413 C-150+A-90 Beam CB1OT 0,891378 0,045020 0,331550 0,514807 2 H-200X200 Column CB15OT 0,891066 0,499677 281 H-200X200 Beam CB3O 0,887922 0,043468 0,843420 0,001034 1430 A-75X6 Beam CB16OT 0,887220 0,102739 1489 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,877898 0,107826 877 2A-75X9 Brace CB1OT 0,875967 0,288793 59 H-200X200 Column CB16OT 0,875616 0,461270 428 C-150+A-90 Beam CB1OT 0,872844 0,030797 0,347071 0,494976 57 H-200X200 Column CB14OT 0,872463 0,392222 1292 C-150X75 Beam CB2T 0,869653 0,047048 0,000246 0,822358 1473 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,863535 0,115522 583 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,861647 0,116420 1477 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,861397 0,207367 1465 A-75X6 Beam CB17OT 0,860271 0,193673 378 A-75X6 Beam CB1OT 0,859413 0,024454 1437 A-75X6 Beam CB15OT 0,858939 0,181300 1466 A-75X6 Beam CB16OT 0,857086 0,087812 552 2A-90X10 Column CB16O 0,855683 0,325467 605 A-75X6 Beam CB2O 0,854839 0,050546 1270 C-150X75 Beam CB2T 0,854775 0,046878 0,000204 0,807693 623 A-75X6 Beam CB14OT 0,851941 0,132159 0,080941 0,855752 0,254303 0,549266 0,358192 0,288275 0,242276 0,308597 0,291222 0,430056 0,570633 0,567665 0,426625 0,441231
0,250400 0,531521 0,361460 0,206608 0,442762 0,448408 0,255147 0,521665 0,275288 0,500425 0,064643 0,820587 0,222467 0,222247 0,066102 0,803601 0,018807 0,860343 0,303369 0,294025 0,393549 0,412145
0,261598
0,129791
0,223223 0,561258 0,246853 0,523218 0,184038 0,403136 0,245492 0,168855 0,218124 0,262117 0,262514 0,485499 0,225185 0,520041 0,287349 0,366681 0,160535 0,506063 0,026175 0,808784 0,169390 0,508248 0,268493 0,500780 0,529317 0,000900 0,194234 0,610059 0,203057 0,516725