Page 1 of 16

[ Team LiB ]

Chapter 12. AESCCMP

AESCCMP is the strongest security in development for IEEE 802.11i. This chapter looks at why AES was chosen and at its credentials as an encryption algorithm. Security systems use AES in conjunction with an operating mode; some of the simpler and more common modes are covered here. We then introduce CCMP, the protocol used with IEEE 802.11, and explain how it is implemented in practice. This chapter shows how CCMP fits into the IEEE 802.11 framework and provides state-of-the-art security for the most demanding users.

[ Team LiB ] [ Team LiB ]

Introduction
Chapter 11 looked in detail at TKIP, one of the options for implementing encryption and message authentication under RSN. TKIP, which is mandatory to implement for WPA, will be widely used for Wi-Fi LAN security due to its ability to be used on older WEP cards. However, it is not the default mode for IEEE 802.11i. The default mode is based on a block ciphersuite called the Advanced Encryption Standard or AES. AES-based security can generally be considered as stronger than TKIP-based security. This is not to say that TKIP is inadequate. In reality, TKIP is extremely strong and quite suitable for commercial applications. So why was an AES-based solution defined? And what does it mean to say that it is more secure? The answers to these questions and a detailed look at how AESCCMP works are provided in this chapter. First, let's clarify what we mean when we talk about RSN using AES. AES is not a security protocol; it is a block cipher. In RSN the security protocol built around AES is called Counter ModeCBC MAC Protocol, or CCMP. CCMP defines a set of rules that use the AES block cipher to enable the encryption and protection of IEEE 802.11 frames of data. AES is to CCMP what RC4 is to TKIP. One reason that CCMP is considered stronger than TKIP is that it was designed from the ground up to provide security for IEEE 802.11. The designers took a clean sheet of paper and created CCMP using the best-known techniques. By contrast, TKIP is a compromise, designed to accommodate existing WEP hardware and some aspects of TKIP, notably the Michael integrity protocol, are known to be vulnerable. [ Team LiB ] [ Team LiB ]

Why AES?
When the IEEE 802.11 security task group started work in 2000, its goal was to create a solution that was really secure in all the ways discussed in the first section of this book. It was known at that time that WEP was not very secure, although the really devastating attacks on WEP were only discovered later. One of the important tasks of the group was to select an encryption algorithm for the new security standard. The encryption algorithm is the root of security. It takes known data and converts it into random-looking ciphertext. By itself, an encryption algorithm is by no means sufficient for implementing secure communications: An entire security protocol must be defined for that

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 2 of 16

purpose. However, the encryption algorithm is at the heart of all the operations. If your encryption algorithm requires too much processing power, too much memory, or, in the worst scenario, can be compromised, all the other complexity you built into the security protocol will not produce a useful solution. The timing of the task group on this decision was good because another agency had been considering the same question for a while. No less than the U.S. National Institute for Science and Technology (NIST) had been looking for an encryption method for the U.S. government and other agencies in a range of security applications. NIST's approach was to hold a sort of competition in which the best experts from around the world submitted a proposal and methods. Eventually, this process resulted in the selection of a method and the approval of a standard, FIPS 197 specifying AES (NIST, 2002). NIST's own announcement is so well written that I include the first part here so you can read the details for yourself: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology [Docket No. 000929280120101] RIN 0693ZA42 Announcing Approval of Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 197, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
AGENCY: ACTION:

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Commerce. Notice.

The Secretary of Commerce approves FIPS 197, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), and makes it compulsory and binding on Federal agencies for the protection of sensitive, unclassified information. A new robust encryption algorithm was needed to replace the aging Data Encryption Standard (FIPS 463), which had been developed in the 1970s. In September 1997, NIST issued a Federal Register notice soliciting an unclassified, publicly disclosed encryption algorithm that would be available royalty-free worldwide. Following the submission of 15 candidate algorithms and three publicly held conferences to discuss and analyze the candidates, the field was narrowed to five candidates. NIST continued to study all available information and analyses about the candidate algorithms, and selected one of the algorithms, the Rijndael algorithm, to propose for the AES.
EFFECTIVE DATE:

This standard is effective May 26, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Elaine Barker, (301) 9752911, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 10 Bureau Drive, STOP 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 8930. A copy of FIPS 197 is available electronically from the NIST web site at: <http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/aes/index.html/>.

The IEEE 802.11 task group decided to adopt AES as its core encryption protocol. One benefit of

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 3 of 16

the choice was high confidence that the method is secure, given the amount of review it has received in the NIST selection process. However, there were other less obvious benefits, too. Encryption technology is subject to export control in the United States and other countries. By using a method that is well understood by government agencies, applications for export licenses are more easily processed. The selection of AES for IEEE 802.11i was made before all the trouble with WEP became well known. The expectation was that AES-based solutions would gradually replace WEP as the new standard became deployed. It was not expected that existing Wi-Fi LAN adapters would be upgraded to AES. In most cases, this would not be practical because the hardware needed to implement AES is different from that needed for RC4. However, when the flaws of WEP became known, there was a sudden need to upgrade all the existing hardware and this led to the creation and deployment of TKIP. As a result, we now have three potential solutions: WEP, TKIP, and CCMP. There is a lot in common between WPA/TKIP and RSN/CCMPbased systems. Key management, for example, is almost entirely the same. The biggest differences occur at the low layers where the data is encrypted and decrypted. We start by looking at the cipher AES, and how it can be applied to real data.

[ Team LiB ] [ Team LiB ]

AES Overview
AES is a block cipher. Using mathematical and logical operations, the method combines a key and a 128-bit block of data (unencrypted) to produce a block of different data (encrypted). For all practical purposes, it is impossible perform this transform if you don't know the key. AES is reversible (that is, you can convert back to the original data using decryption), which is useful, but not essential to all security protocols. The encrypted and unencrypted blocks are exactly the same size. The conversion of a single block of 128 bits of data is all that AES doesbut it does it quite efficiently and is extremely secure. It is very unlikely that any fundamental weakness will be discovered in future. AES is based on the Rijndael algorithm, invented by Joan Daeman and Vincent Rijmen. This algorithm is very well documented, including the algorithm and implementation details (Daeman and Rijmen, 2000, 2001). The overview in this book provides a flavor of the method and does not attempt to provide any mathematical justification, although it is necessary to look at some of the quirky arithmetic involved. The Rijndael algorithm allows for a selection of block sizes and key sizes. The choices are 128, 192, or 256 bits for each. When NIST adopted Rijndael for AES, it specified only one block size, 128 bits, but retained the choice of three key lengths. IEEE 802.11i goes one step further and restricts both the key size and the block length to 128 bits. This simplifies implementation and relieves the users of having to make yet another choice during installation.

Modes of Operation
You can use AES to encrypt and decrypt a single fixed length block of data. However, in practice real messages do not occur as fixed-length blocks. Wi-Fi LAN data, for example, is transmitted in frames of various different lengths, typically between 512 to 12,000 bits in each frame. Therefore, to make use of a block cipher like AES, you need to define a way of converting an arbitrary-length message into a sequence of fixed-length blocks prior to encryption. Similarly, the method has to enable you to reassemble messages from blocks during decryption. The method used to convert

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 4 of 16

between messages and blocks is referred to as the block cipher's mode of operation. There are quite a few different modes that can be used in conjunction with AES. NIST, for example, has a list of 16 different approaches on its Web site and is open for more proposals. The choice of the mode is very important because it has implications both for the complexity of implementation and also for security. Bad modes can create security loopholes even though the underlying AES encryption is so strong. CCMP uses a mode called CCM, which itself is based on counter mode. Before looking at these modes, let's consider the issue of message authenticity. AES provides a method for encrypting data, obscuring the content so it cannot be read by an attacker. However, and just as important, the receiver needs to know that the message is authenticthat it has not been modified. This is usually accomplished by adding a message integrity code (MIC).[1] For efficiency, we want this MIC to be computed using the AES encryption algorithm so it makes sense that the operating mode should define how to provide both encryption and authenticity.
[1]

The term "MAC" is widely used in cryptography, but IEEE 802.11i (and other chapters in this book) use the term MIC instead because the acronym MAC is already used.

To understand modes of operation, we start by reviewing one of the most simple and intuitive modes: Electronic Code Book (ECB). The mode is generally indicated by being placed after the letters "AES" so a system using Electronic Code Book described as AES/ECB.

Electronic Code Book (ECB)

ECB mode (Menezes et al., 1996; Schneier, 1996) simply takes a piece off the input message one block at a time and encrypts each block sequentially using the same key until no more pieces are left. This process is shown in Figure 12.1, which displays the computation for both serial (one block at a time) and parallel encryption.

Figure 12.1. ECB Operating Mode

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 5 of 16

This approach sounds simple, but it has a couple of problems. The most obvious is that the message may not be an exact multiple of the block size so you have to pad out any partial block at the end and remember the real length. However, there is also a security problem: If two blocks have the same data, the encrypted result of the two blocks will also be the same, giving information to any onlooker. Consider a message composed of a string of the same letter repeated 64 times, for example, "AAAAAAA". If the AES block size is 128 bits (16 bytes), then using ECB would break down the message to four blocks, each with a string of 16 A's. After encryption, the four blocks would each produce identical ciphertext, informing an onlooker that this message has a repeating pattern. Because of this weakness (and others), practical systems do not use ECB. It is not, for example, on the list of NIST-recommended modes. Even the strongest block cipher cannot protect against weaknesses in the mode.

Counter Mode
Counter mode is more complicated that ECB and operates in quite a different way. It does not use the AES block cipher directly to encrypt the data. Instead, it encrypts the value of an arbitrary value called the counter and then XORs the result with the data to produce ciphertext. The counter is generally incremented by 1 for each successive block processedhence the name. This process is shown in Figure 12.2.

Figure 12.2. Example of Counter Mode

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 6 of 16

In this example the message is divided into blocks, and each block is XORed, with the result of encrypting the counter value using AES. In Figure 12.2 the counter starts at 1 and increments up to 11. In practice, the counter might start at an arbitrary value and might increment by some other value or pattern. The important thing is that the receiving party who wants to decrypt the message must know the starting value of the counter and the rules for advancing it. Because the counter changes value for each block, the problem seen in ECB with repeating blocks is avoided. Even if two blocks of data were identical, they would be combined with a different counter value to produce different ciphertext. However, as presented, this method would still encrypt two identical, but separate, messages to the same result. This is why, in practice, the counter does not start at 1. Typically, it is initialized from a nonce value that changes for each successive message. Counter mode has some interesting properties. Decryption is exactly the same process as encryption because XORing the same value twice takes you back to the original value.[2] This means that implementations only need to implement the AES encryption block (and not the decryption block). The other useful feature, for some applications, is that the encryption can be done completely in parallel. Because all the counter values are known at the start, you could have a bank of AES encryption devices and encrypt an entire message in a single parallel operation. This is not the case for many of the other modes. The last useful property is that there is no problem if the message doesn't break into an exact number of blocks. You simply take the last (short) block and XOR it with the encrypted counter output using only the number of bits you need. Therefore, the length of the ciphertext can be exactly the same as the length of the input message. Because each block operation depends on the state of the counter from the previous block, counter mode is essentially stream cipher.
[2] This is an example in which the underlying cipher does not need to be reversible.

Counter mode has been used for more than twenty years and is well known and trusted by the cryptographic community. Its simplicity and maturity make it an attractive option for RSN. However, basic counter mode does not provide any message authentication, only encryption. Therefore, for RSN, additional capability must be added.

Counter Mode + CBC MAC : CCM

CCM mode was created especially for use in IEEE 802.11i RSN, but it is applicable to other systems as well and has been submitted to NIST as a general mode for use with AES. It has also been submitted to the IETF for use in IP security. CCM was invented by three of the cryptographers participating in the IEEE 802.11i standards group: Doug Whiting, Russ Housley, and Niels Ferguson. It builds on top of counter mode. CCM uses counter mode in conjunction with a message authentication method called cipher block chaining (CBC). CBC is used to produce a message integrity code (MIC). The MIC is called a message authentication code by the cryptographic community, leading to the name CBC-MAC.

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 7 of 16

CBC-MAC is another technique that has been used for many years and has been standardized internationally. For more information, see Bellare et al. (2000). It is really simple in concept: 1. Take the first block in the message and encrypt it using AES (or any block cipher). 2. XOR the result with the second block and then encrypt the result. 3. XOR the result with the next block and encrypt thatand so on. The result is a single block (128 bits in our case) that combines all the data in the message. If one or more bits were to change in the message, the result would be completely different (okay, so there is a 2-128 chance it will be the same). CBC-MAC is simple but cannot be parallelized; the encryption operations must be done sequentially. Furthermore, it should be noted that, by itself, CBC-MAC can only be used on messages that are an exact number of blocks. CCMP provides a solution based on padding, as described later; however, the padding method has raised concerns among some cryptographers. CCM mode pulls together two well-known approaches, counter mode and CBC-MAC. It adds some features that are very useful for certain applications such as RSN. The features it adds are: Specification of a nonce so successive messages are separated cryptographically. Linking together the encryption and authentication (message integrity) under a single key. Extension of the authentication to cover data that is not to be encrypted. The last item needs further explanation and is important for RSN. In most existing methods that perform both encryption and authentication, an assumption is made that the entire message will be encrypted. However, in IEEE 802.11, only part of the message needs to be encrypted. The header portion of the IEEE 802.11 frame contains the MAC addresses used to deliver the frame as well as other information relevant to operation of the Wi-Fi LAN. These fields must be sent "in the clear" so other wireless devices can operate. Therefore, only the data portion of the frame is encrypted. However, although the header is not encrypted, the receiver would still like assurance that it has not been modified. For example, you don't want an attacker to change the source address so you accidentally reply to him instead of to the original sender. To achieve this, CCM mode allows the encryption to be performed on a subpart of the message that is authenticated by CBC-MAC. As a general rule, using the same key for two separate cryptographic functions is not wise. This rule appears to be broken here because the same key is used for both encryption and authentication. However, although the same key is used, it is in each case used in conjunction with an initialization vector (IV). The construction of the IV is different for the counter mode and CBCMAC portions, thus leading, in effect, to two separate keys. The effectiveness of this separation has been shown by cryptographers (Jonsson, 2002).

Offset Codebook Mode (OCB)

OCB mode was invented by Phil Rogaway of the University of California, Davis, following on from work done at IBM Research Labs. It is an authenticated encryption scheme, which means it achieves both message encryption and authentication in a single computation. OCB has some advantages: OCB is parallelizable so it can be done faster using multiple hardware blocks.

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 8 of 16

OCB is very efficient, taking only slightly more than the theoretical minimum encryption operations possible. OCB is provably secure, which means it can be "proved" that it is as secure as the underlying block cipher (AES). Because of its advantages, OCB was the first mode selected by the IEEE 802.11i working group and was given the name WRAP. However, concern was raised over intellectual property rights. The standards group was concerned about mandating a method that might, in the future, result in the need to make license payments. Therefore, CCMP was adopted as mandatory and OCB was eventually dropped. It is mentioned here because a few vendors have implemented WRAP, and it is possible you might encounter it as a proprietary mode in some early implementations. If you want more details of OCB, visit Rogaway's Web site www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway or read the conference paper (Rogaway et al., 2001).

[ Team LiB ] [ Team LiB ]

How CCMP Is Used in RSN

This section describes how Wi-Fi LAN packets are encrypted using CCMP. The first important point is that CCMP encrypts data at the MPDU level. The difference between MPDU and MSDU is discussed in Chapter 11; but to recap, the MPDU corresponds to the frames that actually get transmitted over the radio link. There is one MPDU for each frame transmitted, and the MPDU itself might be the result of fragmenting larger packets passed from a higher layer, called MSDUs.

Steps in Encrypting a Transmission

Figure 12.3 shows the flow of data from MSDU to MPDU and eventually out to the radio link.

Figure 12.3. Flow of Frames Through CCMP

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 9 of 16

The data arrives as an MSDU and may be broken into fragments. Each fragment is formed into an MPDU and assigned its own IEEE 802.11 header containing source and destination addresses and other information. At this point, each MPDU is processed by the CCMP algorithm to generate a new encrypted MPDU. Only the data part is encrypted, not the header. However, CCMP does more than just encrypt portions of the MPDU. It also inserts extra fields, causing the resulting encrypted MPDU to be 16 bytes longer than the original. An overview of the steps in encrypting an MPDU are shown in Figure 12.4 and described below: 1. We start with an unencrypted MPDU, complete with IEEE 802.11 MAC header. The header includes the source and destination address, but the values of some fields will not be known until later and are set to 0 for now. 2. The MAC header is separated from the MPDU and put aside. Information from the header is extracted and used while creating the 8-byte MIC value. At this stage the 8-byte CCMP header is constructed for later inclusion into the MPDU 3. The MIC value is now computed so as to protect the CCMP header, the data, and parts of the IEEE 802.11 header. Liveness is ensured by the inclusion of a nonce value. The MIC is appended to the data. 4. The combination of data and MIC is encrypted. After encryption the CCMP header is prepended. 5. Finally the MAC header is restored onto the front of the new MPDU and the MPDU is ready to the queued for transmission. The transmission logic need have no knowledge of the CCMP header. From here until transmission, only the MAC header will be updated.

Figure 12.4. Steps in Processing an MPDU

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 10 of 16

The encrypted MPDUs are placed on a queue prior to transmission. There might be several queues waiting their turn based on some priority policy. This allows for later extension to accommodate different traffic classes under IEEE 802.11e. Immediately prior to transmission, some of the fields of the IEEE 802.11 header are updated to meet transmission rules. Those fields that are subject to such changes are called mutable fields and are excluded from the MIC computation.

CCMP Header
The CCMP header must be prepended to the encrypted data and transmitted in the clear (that is unencrypted). The CCMP header has two purposes. First, it provides the 48-bit packet number (PN) that provides replay protection and enables the receiver to derive the value of the nonce that was used in the encryption. Second, in the case of multicasts, it tells the receiver which group key has been used (see Chapter 10). The format of the CCMP header is very similar to that used for the TKIP header. This is intentional to simplify implementation for access points that need to receive transmissions from a mixed group of TKIP and CCMP mobile devices. The format is shown in Figure 12.5.

Figure 12.5. CCMP Header

Six bytes are used for the 48-bit PN value, 1 byte is reserved, and the remaining byte contains the

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 11 of 16

KeyID bits, the function of which is described in Chapter 10. Note that the bit next to the KeyID bits is set to a value of 1, corresponding to the Extended IV bit in TKIP. This value indicates that the frame format is RSN rather than the earlier WEP format.

Overview of Implementation
Implementation of the CCMP block can be viewed as a single process with inputs and outputs, as shown in Figure 12.6.

Figure 12.6. Encryption and Decryption with CCMP

Note that the decryption phase has the same inputs as the encryption phase (except that the input MPDU is encrypted). This is because the header information, including the CCMP header, is transmitted across the link in the clear and can therefore be extracted by the receiver prior to decryption. The implementation of CCMP (shown in Figure 12.4 as a "block") must keep a sequence counter called the packet number (PN), which it increments for each packet processed. This prevents an attacker trying to reuse a packet that has previously been sent. The PN is 48 bits long, large enough to ensure it never overflows. There will never be two packets sent with the same sequence value. Of course if you power down the device and restart, the PN will be reset, but this will be with a different key value and hence does not create a threat. Implementation of the CCMP encryption block is shown in Figure 12.7.

Figure 12.7. CCMP Encryption Block

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 12 of 16

Note how the computation occurs in two stages: first, the MIC is calculated and appended to the MPDU, and then the entire MPDU (including MIC) is encrypted to produce the result. Let's look in more detail at each step. An encrypted MPDU contains two more fields than an unencrypted MPDU. It has the CCMP header and the MIC value. The MIC field is 8 octets (64 bits). Note that the MIC is only half the size of the AES block but is still long enough to reduce the chance of a successful MIC forgery to less than 1 in 1019. The order of fields in the encrypted MPDU is shown in Figure 12.8.

Figure 12.8. MPDU Encrypted under CCMP (CH = CCMP Header)

Steps in Encrypting an MPDU

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 13 of 16

Before starting the encryption process, it is useful to prepare all the pieces of the MPDU in the order they will eventually appear. We start off with three pieces: the MAC header, the CCMP header, and the plaintext data, as shown in Figure 12.8a. The mutable fields of the MAC header are masked out by setting them to 0. The CCMP header is filled in with the PN and KeyID bits. Note that the PN is incremented by one for each MPDU prior to being used. The data portion can be filled in with plaintext data. The MAC header and CCMP headers will not be encrypted but need to be protected by the MIC. These two items are grouped together to form the authenticated data, as shown in Figure 12.8b. The first job after assembling the pieces is to compute the MIC.

Computing the MIC

Computation of the MIC is done using CBC-MAC, which encrypts a starting block and then successively XORs subsequent blocks and encrypts the result. The final MIC is one 128-bit block, but we only need a 64-bit MIC so, for CCMP, we discard the lower 64 bits of the result. In CCMP the first block of the CBC-MAC computation is not taken directly from our MPDU but is formed in a special way using a nonce value. The format of the first block is shown in Figure 12.9 comprising a nonce and two other fields: Flag and DLen.

Figure 12.9. Format of the First Block for CBC-MAC

The nonce guarantees freshness by ensuring that each encryption uses data that has never been used before (under a given key). You might think that we could just use the packet number (PN) for the nonce because it increments for each MPDU and hence never repeats. However, remember that the key is shared between at least two communicating parties (more for the group key) and these parties may, each at some point, use a PN that has already been used by another party, violating the "use once per key" rule. To avoid this problem, the nonce is formed by combining the PN with the MAC address of the sender. The third field included in the nonce is the Priority field. The Priority field is a placeholder for future capability when there are different traffic streams with different characteristics (audio, video, and so on). In such a case, it might be useful to have a separate PN for each type of data. The three fields combine to create the 104-bit nonce, as shown in Figure 12.10.

Figure 12.10. Constructing the First Block for CBC-MAC

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 14 of 16

The other two fields that, with the nonce, create the first block for CBC-MAC are also shown in Figure 12.10. The flag field has a fixed value of 01011001 and indicates, among other things, that the MIC is 64 bits. In other (non-RSN) applications of CCM, the Flags field might be different, but this does not concern us here. The last field, DLen, indicates the length of the plaintext data. Once the first block has been prepared, the MIC is computed one block at a time by incorporating the authenticated data and then incorporating the plaintext data. One of the characteristics of CBCMAC is that it works only for an exact number of blocks. If the data doesn't divide into an exact number, it must be padded. For the purposes of the MIC computation, CCMP requires that both the authenticated data and the plaintext data be padded to an exact number of blocks. In IEEE 802.11, it is likely that neither the authenticated data nor the plaintext data will be a suitable length, so each is padded with zeros to meet this requirement, as shown in Figure 12.8C. The MIC is computed across the combination of the special first block, the authenticated data, and the plaintext data, including the zero pad bytes. Note that the pad bytes are only inserted for the MIC computation and are not actually inserted in the MPDU, as illustrated by Figure 12.8d.

Encrypting the MPDU

Once the MIC has been computed and appended to the plaintext data, we are ready to start encrypting the MPDU. The encryption occurs using counter mode and starting with the data immediately following the CCMP header in the template. Note that because of the padding during the MIC computation, we are guaranteed that the blocks to be encrypted will be aligned with the blocks included in the MIC computation. The encrypted data replaces the original data for the entire data portion and the MIC value, resulting in a complete encrypted MPDU ready to be queued for transmission, as shown in Figure 12.8E. It is not necessary to use padding for the encryption stage because counter mode allows any excess bits in the last block to be discarded. An essential step in counter mode is to initialize the counter in a way that avoids ever using the same start value twice. Therefore the counter is constructed from a nonce in an almost identical way to that for the MIC. In fact the nonce value used is identical to that of the MIC and includes the sequence counter, source MAC address, and priority fields. This value is then joined with two fields: Flag and Counter ("Ctr"), as shown in Figure 12.11.

Figure 12.11. Constructing the Counter for CCMP AES Counter Mode

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 15 of 16

The ctr value starts at 1 and counts up as counter mode proceeds. Because the nonce is a unique value and the ctr field is 16 bits long, you are guaranteed to have unique counter values for any message with fewer than 65536 blocks. This easily accommodates the largest MPDUs allowed in IEEE 802.11. Well, almost ready. First we need to put back all the fields in the MAC header that were masked out for the MIC computation. Although these fields are not used for the MIC, they may still be important. Once the counter is initialized, encryption can proceed as described in the previous section "Counter Mode" in this chapter. Each successive value of the counter is encrypted using the secret key and XORed with the template data to produce the encrypted data.

Decrypting MPDUs
When the encrypted MPDU is delivered to the receiver, the first job is to get the right key for decryption. The correct pairwise keys are selected based on the source MAC address in the MAC header. There are a number of steps the receiver must take to extract and check the validity of the received data. Decryption is only one step and this process is more generally called decapsulation. The packet number (PN) is sent unencrypted in the CCMP header. The first thing the receiver does is to read the PN and compare to the last frame received. If the sequence number is lower or equal to the last one, it should be discarded as a replay of an old message. In this case the receiver goes no further with the MPDU. Assuming the PN matches, the next step is to prepare for decryption using AES/counter mode. This requires the computation of the starting value for the counter, which must match that value used in encryption. All the information is available in the received frame. The sequence number can be combined with the source MAC address and priority to create the nonce. This is then combined with the known flag value and the start ctr value (also 1) to create the initial counter. Note there is no secret here: Any attacker can compute the same value. However, it is of no use unless the secret key is also known. Decryption proceeds as for encryption. Successive values of the counter are encrypted and XORed with the received MPDU to restore the unencrypted data and the MIC value. The next stage is to verify that the MIC value is correct. The MIC value is recalculated across the same data (and padding) as the original MPDU at the sender. The mutable fields in the header are masked out and the computation performed over the whole MPDU, excluding the MIC. Of course, if the data is unaltered from when it was sent, and we have the right secret key, the same result will be obtained. This can be compared to the MIC value sent with the frame: A match means the frame is valid. A mismatch is most likely evidence of an attack and the frame will be discarded. Interestingly, with CCMP the process of decryption is almost identical to that for encryption, leading

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010

Page 16 of 16

to a nice simplification for implementation. Once the MPDU is decoded, the MIC and CCMP header can be removed, and is the remaining data is passed up for reassembly with other received fragments to reform the MSDU. You can see how the CCMP process gives protection against forgery, eavesdropping, and copy/replay attacks. It is very strong. As we said at the start of the chapter, the most advanced security protocol is of no use if the underlying cipher mechanism (in this case, AES) has a flaw. AES has no known flaws that might compromise security. If you are interested, Appendix A describes how AES works. This appendix includes some mathematics, which may be unfamiliar. It you are prepared to accept AES as a "black box" that encrypts blocks of data, then feel free to skip the appendix! [ Team LiB ] [ Team LiB ]

Summary
A large number of Wi-Fi systems have been deployed based on the RC4 encryption algorithm. This was part of the IEEE 802.11 WEP implementation and has been included in the WPA TKIP specification to allow firmware upgrades possibly in combination with a driver upgrade. However, when the IEEE 802.11 committee started looking for a new security solution to be built from scratch, they chose instead the cipher AES on which to build. This chapter has explained why that decision was made and how it has been incorporated into the RSN solution. AES is a cipher that can be used in many ways to create security protocols. This chapter has looked at the various modes that have been designed to use AES in practical situationsin particular, a new mode called CCM that was invented to support IEEE 802.11 TGi RSN and that is now likely to be adopted by NIST as one of the standard modes for AES. This mode forms the basis of CCMP, the AES-based protocol for IEEE 802.11i. We have now covered, in this book, all the core protocols needed to implement WPA and RSN security. The next chapter looks at how the techniques are applied to IBSS networks and covers additional mechanisms that enable Wi-Fi systems to identify and safely select other Wi-Fi systems that support the new security provisions.

[ Team LiB ]

file://C:\Documents and Settings\deepak\Local Settings\Temp\~hh883F.htm

6/9/2010