tfi ruffiffi

H$Tfi

ffi ffiH-&Ss

ffiffiK3ffi$

fl}ile cannot talk about English conversation codes without talking L/ about class. And one cannot talk at atrl without imrnediately
revealing one's owrl social class. This may to some extent apply internationally, but the most ffequently quoted comments on the issue are E,nglish ' from Ben Jonson's 'Language rnost shows a man" Speak that I may see thee' to George Bernard Shaw's rather fi1ore explicitly classrelated: 'It is irnpossible for an Englishman to open his mouth without making some other Englishman hate hirn or despise hirn'. We may like to tFrink that we have become less class-obsessed in recent times, but Shaw's observation is as pertinent now as it ever was. All English people, wlrether they admit it or not, are fitted with a sort of social Global Positioning Satellite cornputer that tells us a person's position on the class rnap as soon as lie or she begins to speak. There are two main factors involved in the calculation of this posi: tion: terminobgy and pronunciation * tire words you use and how you say them. Pronunciation is a more reliable indicator (it is relatively easy to learn the terminology of a different class), so I'll start with that.

TFI

E VOUITLS VS CONSONJANTS RULT

Y \J, Yr l-l-\, Y\-, rlrVll\,\-'tllt\lI I \.f l\rvrL-l-

The first class indicator collcerns which typ of ietter you favour in your pronunciation' or rather, w}ich type you fail to pronounce. Those at the top of the social scale like to think that their way of speaking is 'correct', as,it' is clear and intelligible and accLrrate, whiie lower-class speech is 'incorrect' , a'lazy' way of talking - unclear, often unintelligible, and iust plain wrong. Exhibit A in this argument is the lowerclass failure to pronounce consonants, in particular the glottal stop the omission (swallowing, dropping) of 't's - and the dropping of 'h's.
73

LINGUISTIC CLASS CODTS

74

75

76

77

78

79

LINGUISTIC CLASS CODES AND ENGLISHNESS

So, what do these linguistic class codes tell us about Englishness ? All cultures have a social hierarchy and methods of signalling social status:
8o

8r

LINGUISTIC CLASS CODFS

lnost of us would rather pretend that ciass differences do not exist, or are no longer importrant, or ar leas't that \,ve personally have no classreiateci prejudices"

Which brings me to another English'characteristic: hypocrisy. Irlot that our pious deniai of our class-obsessions is specificaily intended to mislead - it seems to be more a matter of self-deception than any delib
erate deception of others; a kind of collective self-deception, perhaps? have a hunch rhat this distirrctively English brand of hypocrisy will come up again, and might even turn out to be one of the 'defining char-

acteristics' we are looking

tor.

.,'

8z

83