Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Topic
1
Question
15
Project
management
is
designed
for
industries
which
have
complex
(as
opposed
to
simple)
tasks
and
which
operate
in
an
ever
changing,
dynamic
(as
opposed
to
static)
environment.
These
include
aerospace,
defense,
construction,
computers,
high
technology,
electrical
instrumentation,
etc.
...
Companies
that
have
highly
repetitive
tasks,
such
as
low
technology
manufacturing
companies,
do
not
need
formal
project
management
but
can
use
informal
project
management
for
activities
such
as
capital
equipment
projects.
Furthermore,
project
management
works
best
in
situations
where
activities
require
the
involvement
of
more
than
one
functional
group.
Question
212
Because
the
project
manager
is
under
time,
cost,
and
performance
constraints,
he
often
has
to
take
risks
and
cut
corners
in
order
to
get
the
task
accomplished.
Topic
2
Question
312
The
company
has
been
very
successful
in
the
past
using
informal
project
management
where
people
appear
to
be
talking
to
one
an-
other
and
making
decisions
that
are
in
the
best
interest
of
the
project.
This
type
of
structure
cannot
work
effectively
for
large
organizations
or
large
projects
which
span
several
departments.
However,
many
companies
find
this
organizational
structure
effective
because
they
get
the
advantages
of
formal
project
management
without
the
disadvantages
of
the
necessity
for
formally
defined
authority
and
a
massive
flow
of
paperwork.
Personnel
resent
organizational
change
unless
they
are
convinced
that
the
new
structure
will
give
them
more
authority,
responsibility,
opportunity
for
advancement,
ability
to
build
an
empire,
more
status,
more
pay,
and
other
such
arguments.
Question
414
Determining
the
how
and
who
is
a
functional
responsibility.
Determining
when
is
a
joint
responsibility
in
that
the
project
manager
determines
the
gross
milestones
and
the
functional
managers
determine
the
intermediate,
detailed
milestones.
Mobilizing
the
resources
is
a
project
office
responsibility.
Topic
3
Question
5-61
Management
by
inaction:
Grows
out
of
fear
and
anxiety.
Management
by
detail:
Needs
every
conceivable
fact.
Methodical,
orderly.
Often
is
inappropriate
or
late.
Management
by
invisibility:
Is
not
around.
Has
good
subordinates.
Works
in
office,
offstage.
Management
by
consensus:
Can
be
important
in
uncertain
areas.
Subordinates
are
independent
and
powerful.
Could
be
a
substitute
for
decision-making.
Important
for
setting
policy.
Management
by
manipulation:
Can
be
fair
or
unfair,
effective
or
ineffective,
legitimate
or
illegitimate.
Some
people
are
manipulators
of
others
for
power
feeling.
People
are
not
puppets.
Management
by
rejection:
The
roughly
negative
style.
Always
has
ideas.
Devils
advocate.
Well-
prepared
proponents
can
winso
such
a
boss
can
be
stimulating.
Management
by
survival:
Executive
will
do
anything
to
survive.
The
jungle
fighter.
Done
constructively.
The
executive
will
build
instead
of
destroy.
Management
by
despotism:
Totalitarian.
No
clashes
of
ideas.
The
organization
moves.
Creative
people
flee.
Always
know
who
is
boss.
Management
by
creativity:
Good,
so
long
as
its
based
on
reality.
Has
a
trained
instinct.
Management
by
leadership:
The
executive
who
manages
with
flair,
wisdom,
and
vision.
He
listens
to
his
men,
prods
them
and
leads
them.
Question
714
Here,
it
might
be
best
if
the
project
manager
uses
his
formal
authority
and
has
both
people
removed
from
the
project.
Re-
moving
only
one
person
will
create
problems
by
showing
favoritism
for
the
second
person.
Manufacturing
must
be
involved
in
the
early
stages
of
a
project.
This
is
to
prevent
the
situation
where
engineering
writes
the
specifications
but
manufacturing
cannot
live
with
it.
Since
the
project
manager
cannot
have
functional
managers
re-
moved
from
the
project,
he
should
simply
withdraw
until
that
time
when
the
managers
can
no
longer
work
out
the
differences
themselves.
Topic
4
Question
8-4
Question
10-17
Brainstorming
cannot
work
unless
there
exists
a
good
environment
with
free
flow
of
information.
Brainstorming
can
produce
beneficial
results
if
properly
controlled.
Arguments
for
brainstorming
include:
Not
an
ongoing
method
for
solving
problems.
It
is
a
technique
for
stimulating
ideas.
Provides
a
structure
for
creative
thinking.
Provides
an
atmosphere
of
free
expression.
Arguments
against
brainstorming
include:
Does
not
work
where
trial
and
error
(instead
of
judgment)
are
needed.
Does
not
allow
for
growth
of
ideas.
Attacks
only
superficial
problems.
Does
not
recognize
or
reward
creators.
How
about
people
who
are
more
creative
by
themselves?
Does
harm
by
forcing
good
ideas
to
come
out
prematurely.
Topic
5
Question
11-26
Several
possible
answers,
the
below
is
one
possible
way
to
structure
your
answer:
Program:
New
Product
Introduction
Project
1:
Sales
Promotion/Advertising
Task
1:
Layout
artwork
Task
2:
Approve
artwork
Task
3:
Sales
manual
Task
4:
Sales
promotion
Task
5:
Trade
advertising
Task
6:
Introduce
at
trade
show
Project
2:
Pricing
Task
1:
Analyze
selling
costs
Task
2:
Analyze
customer
reactions
Task
3:
Storage
and
shipping
costs
Task
4:
Review
plant
costs
Task
5:
Review
cost
of
production
Task
6:
Revise
cost
of
production
Task
7:
Revise
selling
costs
Task
8:
Establish
billing
procedures
Task
9:
Establish
credit
procedures
Project
3:
Market
testing
Project
4:
Manufacturing
Task
1:
Final
specifications
Task
2:
Production
layout
Task
3:
Material
requisitions
Project
5:
Training
Task
1:
Select
salesman
Task
2:
Select
distributors
Task
3:
Train
salesmen
Task
4:
Train
distributors
Task
5:
Print
literature
Task
6:
Literature
to
salesmen
Task
7:
Literature
to
distributors
Question
12-16
(a)
Critical
path
activities
=
a
c
d
i
k
l
m
o,
nodes
=
1
2
4
5
6
7
9
10
Total
slack
-
20
days
a
or
c
can
be
removed
from
the
critical
path
but
the
duration
of
the
project
does
not
change
as
node
1
is
still
on
the
critical
path
The
critical
path
has
less
activities/nodes
but
the
duration
extends
Topic
6
Question
189
This
question
goes
beyond
the
level
of
knowledge
required
for
the
take
home
test
and
is
not
examinable!
First
of
all,
800
units
on
an
80%
learning
curve
requires
468154
hours,
with
the
first
200
units
requiring
182891
hours.
Therefore,
units
201-800
require
285263
hours.
Installing
new
equipment,
the
last
600
units
will
require
107038
hours.
285263
-
107038
=
178225
hours
of
savings.
At
$70/hour,
savings
=
178225
x
70
=
$12,475,750.
If
this
is
simply
one
years
depreciation,
then
the
break-even
point
is
$62,378,750
for
the
equipment.
This
assumes
that
the
machinery
will
be
used
in
years
2-5.
Question
15-24
For
A,
SV
=
+200
and
CV
=
-100
For
B,
SV
=
-200
and
CV
=
+100
For
C,
SV
=
+200
and
CV
=
+300
For
D,
SV=
-200
and
CV
=
-100
For
E,
SV
=
0
and
CV
=
+200
There
are
several
possible
answers
for
each
scenario
Totaling
up
the
variances,
the
summary
schedule
variance
is
0
(i.e.
on
schedule)
and
the
summary
cost
variance
is
+400,
which
is
under
budget.
Things
appear
to
look
good.
Since
B
and
D
are
on
the
critical
path,
it
appears
that
we
are
really
behind
schedule
even
though
the
summary
schedule
variance
indicates
we
are
on
schedule.
Topic
7
Question
172
EVs1
=
(16K)
EVs2
=
(6K)
EVs3
=
(11K)
EVs4
=
(55K)
EVs5
=
0
a) Do
not
develop
product;
i.e.
S5
b) S4
c) S2
(under
risk)
d) S5
Question
173
Multiple
possible
ways
of
completing
this
but
the
below
shows
a
proper
payoff
table:
Expected
Value
Make
6,000
50,000
360,000
Total
Make
Purchase
6,000
410,000
50,000
360,000
8,700
418,700
50,000
360,000
17,400
427,400
50,000
360,000
26,100
436,100
50,000
360,000
34,800
444,800
419,048
399,000
399,000
399,000
399,000
399,000
399,000
Defective
Topic
8
Question
11
Each
of
the
causes
can
produce
each
of
the
effects.
You
could
comment
that
these
cause
and
effect
relationships
look
like
their
last
project.
This
is
the
reason
why
project
managers
must
continuously
re-plan
projects.
Bottom-up estimates are usually more accurate than initial macro estimates.
Immediate actions:
Jenny should have alternatives and especially a preferred plan of action to offer.
Suggestions:
Change
the
scope
of
the
project.
Since
little
information
is
provided,
this
is
an
easy
solution
to
avoid
the
harder
questions.
Partnering
with
expert
organization
to
reduce
cost.
This
is
a
very
good
and
viable
approach.
Cancel
the
project.
Not
really
an
alternative.
In
the
end
senior
management
must
deal
with
the
constraints
and
accept
time
and
cost
variation.
Only
is
management
is
not
going
to
reduce
scope
or
increase
cost,
cancelling
the
project
becomes
an
option.
2.
Did
the
senior
executive
make
any
mistakes?
Senior
management
appears
to
have
made
a
judgment
call
based
on
inadequate
or
faulty
information.
Senior
management
should
not
be
in
the
business
of
estimating.
3.
What
estimating
techniques
would
you
suggest?
Depending
on
the
time
constraints
estimates
to
the
work
package
level
are
preferable
when
accuracy
is
required.
If
cost
can
be
controlled
and
time
is
of
the
essence
top-down
estimates
are
useful
and
acceptable.
Sometimes
cost
control
is
abandoned
in
time
critical
project
environments.
However
generally
a
bottom-up
estimate
is
hard
to
beat
when
cost
is
important.
Resource Constraints
7
7
10
10
3
3
2T
10
10
12
12
10
Technician
0
SL
9 10 11 12 13
14 15
#/Res ES LS EF LF SL
Times for
the Resource
Activity Schedule
1/P
2/P
3/P
4/T
12
12
ES
5/2T
SL
Re
6/P
12
12
14
14
LS
Du
Legend
EF
LF