ToL - 09 - 14 - 09 - Regular Council Agenda Package

REGULAR MEETING OF
TOWNSHIP COUNCIL
Monday, September 14, 2009 at 7:00 p.m.
Fraser River Presentation Theatre
4th Floor, 20338 – 65 Avenue, Langley, BC
AGENDA
Page
A. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
1-9 1. Regular Council Meeting – August 31, 2009
Recommendation that Council adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council

meeting held August 31, 2009.
B. PRESENTATIONS
C. DELEGATIONS (UP TO 5 DELEGATIONS)
D. REPORTS TO COUNCIL
E. BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING
F. BYLAWS FOR FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD READING
G. BYLAWS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THIRD READING

September 14, 2009
Regular Council Meeting Agenda
Page
H. BYLAWS FOR FINAL ADOPTION
11-89 1. Rezoning Application RZ100311

(Jeannotte/Tanzite)
Bylaw No. 4693
Report 08-135 and 09-35
File CD 11-06-0179
Recommendation that Council give final reading to “Township of Langley

Zoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500 Amendment (Jeannotte) Bylaw 2008
No. 4693”.
Explanation – Bylaw No. 4693
Bylaw No. 4693 rezones 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 – 49A
Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a five (5) lot single
family subdivision.
Clerk’s Note: Community Development advises that all development prerequisites

listed in the Community Development Division report to Council of March 23, 2009
and July 28, 2008 attached to the Bylaw have been satisfactorily addressed. The
Public Hearing for the bylaw was held on September 15, 2008 with third reading
given on March 23, 2009.
I. CORRESPONDENCE
J. OTHER BUSINESS
K. TERMINATE
A.1
- 330 -
REGULAR MEETING OF
TOWNSHIP COUNCIL
Monday, August 31, 2009 at 7:00 p.m.
Fraser River Presentation Theatre
4th Floor, 20338 – 65 Avenue, Langley, BC
MINUTES
Present: Mayor Green
Councillors J. Bateman, B. Dornan, S. Ferguson, C. Fox, M. Kositsky, B. Long,

K. Richter and G. Ward
M. Bakken, P. Catlin, D. Leavers and R. Seifi
S. Carneiro
A. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
1. Regular Council Meeting – July 20, 2009
Moved by Councillor Bateman,

Seconded by Councillor Dornan,
That Council adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council meeting held on
July 20, 2009.
CARRIED
B. PRESENTATIONS
1. Bruce Taylor
File 0550-07
Bruce Taylor and Lyall Sharman of Aldergrove Minor Baseball appeared

before Council to thank Council for expanding the park and to request
Council to include the Aldergrove Athletic Park plan in the budget
deliberations for 2010.
The agenda order was varied.
1 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
Regular Council Meeting - 331 -
3. Art Bandenieks
File 0550-07
Art Bandenieks a representative of the Aldergrove Youth Soccer Club and

the Aldergrove United Soccer Club, appeared before Council to discuss the
South Aldergrove Athletic Park Development. He recommended the
Township work toward preparing the site for an artificial turf field for soccer.
2. Heath MacKenzie and Russ Simpson

File 0550-07
Heath MacKenzie and Russ Simpson of Langley Mountain Bike Association

appeared before Council to discuss further development of the Aldergrove
Athletic Park and to voice their support regarding the proposed bicycle skills
park.
The original order of the agenda then resumed.
4. Brad Ricketts
File 0550-07
Brad Ricketts appeared before Council to discuss possible opportunities to

house the Radio Control Flying Club of British Columbia. He requested
Mayor and Council’s endorsement to utilize the Jackman Pit as a flying site
once proper approvals are in place.
Councillor Bateman left the meeting at 7:20 p.m. and rejoined the meeting
at 7:21 p.m.
5. John and Marilyn Thomson

File 0550-07
John and Marilyn Thomson appeared before Council to discuss speeding

traffic through school zones on Willoughby Way and requested that speed
bumps or some kind of traffic calming device be installed.
6. Rodney Blackwell
File 0550-07
Rodney Blackwell appeared before Council regarding the Fort Langley

Waterfront Development. He is concerned that the developer may apply for
a change of zoning to allow more residential construction and has therefore,
requested Council to authorize staff to have a Public Hearing on rezoning.
The community is planning a meeting on September 24, 2009 has invited

Council to attend.
2 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
7. Helen Smith
File 0550-07
Madeleine De Little appeared before Council on behalf of Helen Smith to

discuss the Bedford Landing Development and requested that Council have
public input regarding rezoning.
8. Grant Rawstron
Fort Langley Canoe Club
File 0550-07
Grant Rawstron, Fort Langley Canoe Club appeared before Council to

discuss the Fort Langley Waterfront Development. He recommended that
Council consult the Canoe and Rowing Clubs in the planning process. He
noted that there is a need for storage and clubhouse/training facility.
1. Aldergrove Athletic Park Concept Plan

Report 09-117
File CD 6130-20-AATH1
Moved by Councillor Fox,

Seconded by Councillor Ferguson,
That Council receive the report entitled “Aldergrove Athletic Park Concept
Plan” and the results of the public input, for information;
That Council endorse the Aldergrove Athletic Park Concept Plan to guide
future development of the park; and further
That Council authorize staff to proceed with site preparation as a first phase
of developing the new proposed facilities in the park.
AMENDMENT
Moved by Councillor Richter,

Seconded by Mayor Green,
That staff provide a report on cost of moving forward for the 2010 budget
process.
CARRIED
Councillor Ward opposed

.
The question was called on the main motion, as amended, and it was
CARRIED
3 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
2. Provincial Agricultural Land Commission Application No. 100179

(Larry Rodgers)
Report 09-114
File CD 13-32-0001
Moved by Councillor Ward,

Seconded by Councillor Bateman,
That the Provincial Agricultural Land Commission (PALC) be advised that
the subdivision of property located at 27550 - 48 Avenue, is supported
subject to compliance with the requirements of the PALC and, at the time of
subdivision application, the Township of Langley’s Subdivision and
Development Control Bylaw.
CARRIED
Councillor Ferguson opposed
3. Rezoning Application No. 100333

(Exousia Properties Inc.)
Report 09-113
File CD 13-08-0011
The report was withdrawn.

Development Permit Application No. 100583
(Desert Properties Inc.)
Bylaw 4746
Report 09-116
File CD 08-26-0109
Moved by Councillor Fox,

Seconded by Councillor Ward,
That Council give first and second reading to Rezoning Bylaw No. 4746
rezoning 1.54 ha (3.82 acres) of land located on the north side of 86 Avenue
(west of 201 Street) to Comprehensive Development Zone CD-47 to permit
a business park development, subject to the following development
prerequisites being satisfied prior to final reading:
1. Applicant entering into a Servicing Agreement with the Township to

secure required road and utility upgrades and extensions including a
storm water management plan in accordance with the Township’s
Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw and greenway construction
to the acceptance of the Manager of Parks Design and Development
2. Provision of an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan in accordance with
the Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw to the acceptance of the
4 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
General Manager of Engineering;

3. Provision of road dedication (5.6 metres on 86 Avenue, 3.5 metres on
201 Street and a corner truncation at the 86 Avenue / 201 Street
intersection) in accordance with Schedule P-1 of the Township’s
Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw (Policy Section) as
amended to reflect this requirement to the acceptance of the General
Manager of Engineering;
4. Compliance with the Township’s Tree Protection Bylaw, including
provision of a final tree protection plan incorporating tree retention,
replacement and protection details, to the acceptance of the Manager of
Parks Design and Development;
5. Completion of landscaping plans (including greenway construction and
design requirements) to the acceptance of the Manager of Parks Design
and Development;
6. Register a restrictive covenant limiting access to the site from the
northerly driveway on 201 Street and from 86 Avenue to right in/out
turning movements and prohibiting off-street parking on 86 Avenue and
201 Street abutting the site, to the acceptance of the General Manager
of Engineering;
7. Register a restrictive covenant requiring provision of a 5.0 metre wide
landscaping area adjacent to the 201 Street and 86 Avenue site
frontages;
8. Provision of a CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design)
review of the development (including design and operation of the
parkade, elevators, pedestrian connections and lighting) by a qualified
CPTED professional (in consultation with the Langley RCMP), to the
acceptance of the Director of Community Development, including
incorporation of the CPTED recommendations into the final development
plans;
9. Approval of Rezoning Bylaw No. 4746 by the Ministry of Transportation;
and
10. Payment of supplemental Rezoning Application fee and Site Servicing
Review fee; and further
That Council at time of final reading of Bylaw No. 4746 authorize issuance
of Development Permit No. 100583 subject to the following conditions:
a) Building plans being in substantial compliance with Schedules “A”

through “J”;
b) Final on-site landscaping plans being in substantial compliance with
Schedule “K” and in compliance with the Township’s Tree Protection
Bylaw, and Street Tree and Boulevard Treatment policy, subject to final
acceptance of the Manager of Parks Design and Development;
c) On-site landscaping to be secured by letter of credit at the building
permit stage;
d) Section 8.1 1)a) (maximum freestanding sign area) of Township of
Langley Sign Bylaw 2005 No. 4402 being varied from 20 m2 to
26.24 m2 for a freestanding sign adjacent to existing Building A and
200 Street as shown on Schedules “B” and “L”;
5 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
e) All garbage facilities to be located within buildings or screened;

f) Freestanding signage on 201 Street and 86 Avenue to be in compliance
with Township of Langley Sign Bylaw 2005 No. 4402, and to be
coordinated in design with the freestanding sign adjacent to existing
Building A and 200 Street, and
g) Rooftop mechanical equipment to be located so as not to be visible from
adjacent roads, or alternatively to be screened from view by compatible
architectural treatments.
Although not part of the Development Permit requirements, the applicant is

advised that prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items will
need to be finalized:
h) Payment of supplemental Development Permit application fees.
That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public hearing for the
Rezoning Bylaw in conjunction with Development Permit No. 100583.
CARRIED
Councillor Long left the meeting at 8:28 and rejoined the meeting at
8:31 p.m.

Development Permit Application No. 100590
(Township of Langley)
Bylaw 4769
Report 09-112
File CD 08-14-0172
Moved by Councillor Ferguson,

That Council give first and second reading to Bylaw No. 4769 rezoning
approximately 0.30 ha (0.75 acre) of land located at
7185 – 202B Street to Residential Compact Lot Zone R-CL to accommodate
a three (3) lot single family subdivision, subject to the following development
prerequisites being satisfied prior to final reading:
1. Completion of the required road, utility, landscaping and greenway

upgrades and extensions in accordance with the Township’s Subdivision
and Development Control Bylaw;
2. Provision of road and greenway dedications including 202B Street,
widening of 72 Avenue and extension of the rear lane in accordance
with the Township’s Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw;
3. Compliance with the Township’s Tree Protection Bylaw including
provision of a final tree management plan incorporating tree
replacement and protection details;
4. Compliance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw including
provision of an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan; and
5. Registration of a no-building restrictive covenant over the remnant lot at
6 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
the time of subdivision;
That Council at the time of final reading of Bylaw No. 4769 authorize the
issuance of Development Permit No. 100590 for the proposed single family
development subject to the following condition:
a) Completion of an exterior design control agreement ensuring that

building design and site development standards are high quality and
compatible with surrounding lots; and further
That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public hearing for
Rezoning Bylaw No. 4769 in conjunction with the hearing for proposed
Development Permit No. 100590.
CARRIED
F. BYLAWS FOR FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD READING
H. BYLAWS FOR FINAL ADOPTION

(Dorothy Mufford)
Bylaw No. 4704
Report 08-178
File CD 11-18-0038

Seconded by Councillor Dornan,
That Council give final reading to “Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987
No. 2500 Amendment (Dorothy Mufford) Bylaw 2008 No. 4704.”
CARRIED
I. CORRESPONDENCE
J. ASSOCIATIONS, AGENCIES AND OTHER GOVERNMENT ITEMS
7 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
K. MAYOR’S REPORT
The Mayor attended various events in the community during the past month.
L. METRO VANCOUVER REPRESENTATIVE’S REPORT
The Mayor attended the Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation budget

meeting on transit issues and will report back to Council on the outcome.
M. ITEMS FROM PRIOR MEETINGS
N. ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION FROM

SPECIAL CLOSED MEETINGS
O. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION
P. ITEMS HAVING PRIOR NOTICE OF MOTION
Q. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Traffic Calming – Willoughby Way
Moved by Councillor Richter,

Seconded by Mayor Green,
That a report from staff on traffic calming measures include Willoughby
Way.
CARRIED
2. Councillor Richter provided the following Notice of Motion to be considered

at the next meeting
Waterfront Planning Process in Fort Langley
That staff provide Council with a report on reactivating the planning process
in Fort Langley.
8 of 89
A.1
August 31, 2009
Q. OTHER BUSINESS
3. Radio Control Flying Club

That staff provide a report on location options for the Radio Control Flying
Club.
CARRIED
R. ADDITIONAL DELEGATIONS
S. TERMINATE
Moved by Councillor Ward,
Seconded by Councillor Fox,
That the meeting terminate at 8:42 p.m.
CARRIED
CERTIFIED CORRECT:
Mayor
Deputy Township Clerk
9 of 89
10 of 89
H.1
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY
TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY ZONING BYLAW 1987 NO. 2500

AMENDMENT (JEANNOTTE) BYLAW 2008 NO. 4693
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Bylaw No. 4693 rezones 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 – 49A Avenue to
Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a five (5) lot single family subdivision.
f:\data\council\2009 agenda\09_14\regular agenda\bylaws\4693.doc 11 of 89

H.1
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY
TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY ZONING BYLAW 1987 NO. 2500

AMENDMENT (JEANNOTTE) BYLAW 2008 NO. 4693
WHEREAS it is deemed necessary and desirable to amend “Township of Langley Zoning

Bylaw 1987 No. 2500” as amended;
NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the Township of Langley, in
Open Meeting Assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987
No. 2500 Amendment (JEANNOTTE) Bylaw 2008 No. 4693”.
2. The “Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500” as amended is further
amended by rezoning the lands described as:
Lot 37 Section 6 Township 11 New Westminster District Plan 39985
as shown delineated on Schedule “A” attached to and forming part of this Bylaw to
Residential Zone R-1D.
READ A FIRST TIME the 28 day of July , 2008.

READ A SECOND TIME the 28 day of July , 2008.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 15 day of September , 2008.
READ A THIRD TIME the 23 day of March , 2008.
RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED day of , 2009.
the
Mayor Deputy Township Clerk
f:\data\council\2009 agenda\09_14\regular agenda\bylaws\4693.doc

12 of 89
H.1
f:\data\council\2009 agenda\09_14\regular agenda\bylaws\4693.doc

13 of 89
H.1
REPORT TO
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
PRESENTED: JULY 28, 2008 - REGULAR MEETING REPORT: 08-135

FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FILE: 11-06-0179
SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311
(JEANNOTTE / TANZITE)
PROPOSAL:
Rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) of
land located at 21726 – 49A
Avenue to Residential Zone
R-1D to accommodate a five
(5) lot single family
subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY:
That Council give first and
second reading to Bylaw No.
4693 with completion of
three (3) development
prerequisites.
RATIONALE:
The proposed rezoning
complies with the provisions
of the Murrayville Community
Plan.
F:\data\council\2008 Agenda\07-28\Regular Agenda\E3_cd Rezoning Application RZ100311 Jeannotte Tanzite.doc 14 of 89

H.1
REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311
Page 2 . . .
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Council give first and second reading to Bylaw No. 4693 rezoning 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land
located at 21726 – 49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a five (5) lot single
family subdivision, subject to the following development prerequisites being satisfied prior to
final reading:
1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no significant trees be

removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of services) until
tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisfaction of the
Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;
2. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring provision of an exterior design control
agreement to be entered into at the subdivision approval stage; and further,
3. Payment of supplemental rezoning application fee.
That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public hearing.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Quinn Jeannotte has applied to rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 – 49A Avenue
to Residential Zone R-1D. The rezoning will facilitate the subsequent subdivision of five (5) fully
serviced single family lots. The Murrayville Community Plan designates the lands as “Single
Family Two” allowing subdivisions having a minimum lots size of 650 m2 (7,000 ft2). Staff
supports the rezoning proposal as it complies with the Murrayville Community Plan.
PURPOSE:
This report is to advise and make recommendations with respect to rezoning application number
RZ100311.

H.1
Page 3 . . .
SUBJECT

H.1
Page 4 . . .
ZONING BYLAW NO. 2500
R-1D
R-1D
R-1D

H.1
Page 5 . . .
Preliminary Subdivision Plan – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT
217A
Street

H.1
Page 6 . . .
Conceptual Block Plan – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT
217A
Street
49 Avenue
48A Avenue

H.1
Page 7 . . .
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Owner: Tanzite Ventures Inc.
4038 – 200B Street
Langley, BC V3A 1N9
Applicant: Quinn Jeannotte

2201 – 204A Street
Langley, BC V2Z 2A2
Legal Description: Lot 37 Section 6 Township 11

New Westminster District Plan 39985
PID: 008-695-938
Location: 21726 – 49A Avenue
Area: 0.40 ha (1acre)
Existing Zoning: Suburban Residential Zone SR-1

(minimum lot size 3,716 m2 / 0.92 acre)
Proposed Zoning: Residential Zone R-1D

(minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000 ft2).
Murrayville Community Plan: Single Family Two

(maximum density 15 units per ha / 6 units per
acre; minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000 ft2)
E.S.A. Designation: E.S.A.# 66 – Murrayville Urban Area (Rating - #3)
BACKGROUND:
The subject site is designated “Single Family Two” in the Murrayville Community Plan, allowing
a maximum residential density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minimum lot size
of 650 m2 (7,000 ft2). The current SR-1 zoning is reflective of minimum lot sizes in Murrayville
prior to development and the provision of full urban services. The subject lot is one of only four
(4) properties in the area that have not been rezoned to R-1D.
DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS:
The proponent is applying to rezone approximately 0.40 ha (1.0 acre) of land located at 21726 –
49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a subsequent subdivision of five (5)
single family lots. The subject property is currently occupied by one single family home that will
be removed to accommodate the subdivision.
Adjacent Uses:
The subject site fronts 49A Avenue and is surrounded by single family homes zoned R-1D and
SR-1 (with lots ranging in size from 650m2 to 4,047m2). Although the lots to the east have
developed at the density permitted in the Murrayville Community Plan, the adjacent lots to the
west and south have further subdivision potential.

H.1
Page 8 . . .
Density:
a maximum density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minimum lot size of 650 m2
(7,000 ft2). The applicant proposes a subsequent subdivision application of five (5) single family
lots at a proposed density of 12 units per hectare (5 units per acre) with a minimum lot size of
650 m2 (7,000 ft2).
Subdivision:
A preliminary subdivision layout has been submitted in support of the rezoning proposing the
creation of five (5) single family residential lots. The applicant has also prepared a conceptual
block plan indicating the relationship of the subject site to the adjacent undeveloped lands. As
shown on the conceptual block plan, the introduction of a cul-de-sac to the block protects the
future subdivision potential of these surrounding currently over-sized properties. Subdivision
details, including dedication of the cul-de-sac, will be addressed at time of subdivision pursuant
to the Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw and Policy.
Servicing:
There are no servicing requirements for the proposed rezoning. Existing services are adequate
for the proposed use. At time of subdivision, a Servicing Agreement will be required to secure
construction of the east half of the proposed cul-de-sac (217A Street), installation of full urban
municipal services (water, sanitary, storm) to service the proposed lots in accordance with the
Township’s Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw, and erosion and sediment control
works in accordance with the Township’s Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw.
Tree Protection:
In compliance with the Tree Protection Bylaw, the applicant has submitted a tree survey and
tree summary schedule indicating that there are three (3) significant trees located on the subject
site. Based on the preliminary subdivision layout, all of the significant trees will likely be
removed. As a result, the applicant will be required to plant 30 replacement trees at time of
subdivision. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no significant
trees be removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of services)
until tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisfaction of the
Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision is required as a condition of
final reading.
Transit:
Translink currently operates two Community Shuttles through Murrayville with stops on 48
Avenue, as well as a regular bus route along Fraser Highway. The road layout for Murrayville
has been designed to accommodate future transit routes in accordance with Translink’s
operating policy / procedures, which Council is given an opportunity to review each year.
Environment:
The Township’s Environmentally Sensitive Areas Study identifies the lands as forming part of
the Murrayville Urban Area. The applicant will be required to provide full urban services as well
as a storm water management plan and sediment control measures through a servicing
agreement. The provision of these items along with compliance with the Township’s Tree
Protection Policy satisfies the management guidelines identified in the Township’s
Environmentally Sensitive Areas Study. There are no watercourses onsite.

H.1
Page 9 . . .
Schools:
The subject site is located within the catchment area for James Hill Elementary School,
approximately 1.5 kilometres southeast of the subject site. Langley Fundamental Elementary
School is located 1 block north of the subject site. High school students will attend Langley
Secondary School.
Parks:
There are two parks in the vicinity of the subject site. Denny Ross Memorial Park located
southeast of the site on Old Yale Road. Porter Park is located west of the site on 215 Street.
Development Prerequisites:
Prior to final reading of the rezoning bylaw, the following items must be completed:
1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no significant trees

be removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of services)
until tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisfaction
of the Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;
POLICY CONSIDERATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning application as the proposed development complies
with the land use and density policies of the Murrayville Community Plan. Subdivision details
will be addressed at the subdivision stage pursuant to the Township’s Subdivision and
Development Control Bylaw and Policy.
Respectfully submitted,
Teresa Hanson
DEVELOPMENT PLANNER
for
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
TEH/the

H.1
REPORT TO
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
PRESENTED: MARCH 23, 2009 - REGULAR MEETING REPORT: 09-35

SUBJECT: REZONING BYLAW NO. 4693 (JEANNOTTE/TANZITE)
REVIEW OF COMMENTS AND CONCERNS RAISED AT
PUBLIC HEARING AND OPEN HOUSE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Council receive this report entitled “Rezoning Bylaw No. 4693 (Jeannotte/Tanzite) -
Review of Comments and Concerns Raised at Public Hearing and Open House”, for
information; and further
That Council give third reading to Bylaw No. 4693, subject to the development being in
substantial compliance with the proposed “alternate” layout plan presented in this report; and
subject to the following development pre-requisites being satisfied prior to final reading:
1. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring that on-site significant trees not be removed or
disturbed (except where necessary for the installation of services) until final tree retention,
protection and replacement details are addressed to the acceptance of the Manager of Parks
Design and Development;
agreement to be entered into at the subdivision approval stage; and,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 29, 2008 Council considered third reading of Bylaw No. 4693 rezoning 0.40 ha
(1 acre) of land located at 21726 – 49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a
five (5) lot single family subdivision. Council did not give third reading to the bylaw, but instead
referred the application back to staff to address the comments and concerns raised by the
public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing. In response to the concerns raised at the
public hearing, the applicant submitted a panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) which
proposes five (5) single family lots: two (2) lots fronting 49A Avenue and three (3) lots with
panhandle access to 49A Avenue. The panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) and the
half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original layout) were presented to the area residents at a public
open house held on February 5, 2009. At the open house, the majority of the area residents in
attendance preferred the new panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) over the half cul-de-
sac subdivision plan (original layout). Staff recommend that Bylaw No. 4693 be given third
reading, subject to the development being in substantial compliance with the panhandle
23 of 89
H.1
REZONING BYLAW NO. 4693 (JEANNOTTE/TANZITE)
Page 2 . . .
subdivision plan (alternate layout) and subject to the completion of three (3) development
prerequisites prior to final reading. Alternatively, Council may require that another Public
Hearing be held.
PURPOSE:
As requested by Council, this report provides a staff review of the comments and concerns
raised by the public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing for Bylaw No. 4693 and at the
subsequent open house held by the Township on February 5, 2009.
24 of 89
H.1
Page 3 . . .
PRELIMINARY HALF CUL-DE-SAC SUBDIVISION PLAN – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT

(Original Layout)
PRELIMINARY PANHANDLE SUBDIVISION PLAN – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT

(Alternate Layout)
49AAvenue
25 of 89
H.1
Page 4 . . .
ORIGINAL CONCEPTUAL BLOCK PLAN – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT
ALTERNATE CONCEPTUAL BLOCK PLAN – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT
26 of 89
H.1
Page 5 . . .
BACKGROUND:
At its September 29, 2008 regular meeting, Council considered third reading of Bylaw No. 4693
rezoning a 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 – 49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to
accommodate a five (5) lot single family subdivision. Council did not give third reading to the
bylaw, but instead referred the application back to staff to address the comments and concerns
raised by the public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing and to hold a Township
sponsored open house with area residents.
Attached to this report, for Council’s information, are the original Community Development
Division report to Council dated July 28, 2008 (Attachment A), the minutes from the September
15, 2008 public hearing (Attachment B), and the minutes from the September 29, 2008 regular
meeting (Attachment C).
In accordance with Council’s direction, staff have reviewed the comments and concerns raised
by the public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing. Comments and concerns primarily
focused on the layout of the proposed subdivision plan with respect to the location of the
proposed half cul-de-sac, lot orientation, tree protection, drainage, traffic, emergency vehicle
access and removal of existing structures. Area residents also expressed concern with the
conceptual block plan showing the future subdivision potential of surrounding properties based
on the proponents half cul-de-sac subdivision plan.
In light of the strong opposition to the applicant’s original conceptual block plan expressed by
the area residents, the applicant held several smaller and informal open houses with area
residents (November 28, December 1 and December 2, 2008) to discuss possible alternative
subdivision plans / layouts. Evolving out of this process was the panhandle subdivision plan
(alternate layout), which the majority of the area residents considered best addressed the
comments and concerns raised at the public hearing.
Panhandle Subdivision Plan (Alternate Layout):

The panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) proposes five (5) single family lots, the same
number of lots proposed by the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original layout). The
panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) proposes two (2) lots fronting 49A Avenue and
three (3) lots with panhandle access to 49A Avenue. The three (3) panhandle lots will share a
driveway eight (8) metres wide with a small bulb at the end. This subdivision plan differs
significantly from the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original layout) which proposed three (3)
lots fronting 49A Avenue and two (2) lots fronting a proposed half cul-de-sac along the western
property line.
The alternate conceptual block plan, which was submitted in support of the panhandle
subdivision plan (alternate layout), proposes that surrounding properties with remaining
subdivision potential be allowed to subdivide with panhandle access rather than introducing a
cul-de-sac. Generally, this plan was favoured on the basis of it allowing surrounding properties
to subdivide independently with less impact on adjacent neighbours, whether they wished to
subdivide or not.
27 of 89
H.1
Page 6 . . .
Public Open House:

In accordance with Council’s direction, staff held a public open house on February 5, 2009 to
provide an opportunity for the public to review both the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original
layout) and the newly conceived panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout). An open house
invitation letter (dated January 21, 2009) was mailed to all persons that received a notification
for the September 15, 2008 public hearing and was also mailed to all persons that provided a
submission at the public hearing. The open house invitation letter (Attachment D) included a
brief description of the application, a copy of the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original
layout), a copy of the panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout), and a questionnaire for
those persons unable to attend the open house.
The open house was held February 5, 2009 between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. at the Murrayville
Hall (21667 – 48 Avenue). Community Development Division staff and the applicant attended
the open house to answer questions and give the public an opportunity to provide comments.
26 people attended the open house (as per the sign-in sheet) with 22 questionnaires received,
including those submitted by persons unable to attend the open house. The sign-in sheet, the
questionnaires and a summary of the responses are provided as attachments to this report
(Attachment E).
As per the completed questionnaires received, the majority of the area residents preferred the
panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) over the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original
layout). One (1) person preferred the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original layout), fourteen
(14) persons preferred the panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout), ten (10) persons
preferred neither layout, two (2) persons preferred neither layout, but preferred the panhandle
subdivision plan (alternate layout) over the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original layout), and
one (1) person had no preference. Staff note that seven (7) of the nine (9) surrounding
properties with further subdivision potential (as indicated on the conceptual block plan) prefer
the panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout). The owners of properties opposed to the
panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) either have already rezoned and subdivided to
Residential Zone R-1D lot sizes or are opposed to any further development in the area.
28 of 89
H.1
Page 7 . . .
As requested by Council, this report addresses the comments and concerns raised by the public
at the September 15, 2008 public hearing. Staff note that the proposed panhandle subdivision
plan (alternate layout) complies with both the Murrayville Community Plan and the proposed
Residential Zone R-1D zoning. Although Council has the option of requiring another public
hearing, staff recommend that Bylaw No. 4693 be given third reading, subject to the
development being in substantial compliance with the panhandle subdivision plan (alternate
layout) and subject to the completion of three (3) development prerequisites prior to final
reading. Subdivision details will be addressed at the subdivision stage pursuant to the
Township’s Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw and Policy.
Patrick Ward
DEVELOPMENT PLANNER
for
PJW
ATTACHMENT A July 28, 2008 Report to Council

ATTACHMENT B September 15, 2008 Public Hearing Minutes
ATTACHMENT C September 29, 2008 Third Reading Minutes
ATTACHMENT D January 21, 2009 Open House Invitation Letter
ATTACHMENT E February 5, 2009 Open House Sign In Sheet, Questionnaires and
Summary of Responses
29 of 89
H.1
Attachment A
REPORT TO
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
PRESENTED: JULY 28, 2008 - REGULAR MEETING REPORT: 08-135

SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311
PROPOSAL:
Rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) of
land located at 21726 – 49A
Avenue to Residential Zone
R-1D to accommodate a five
(5) lot single family
subdivision.
RECOMMENDATION
SUMMARY:
That Council give first and
second reading to Bylaw No.
4693 with completion of
three (3) development
prerequisites.
RATIONALE:
The proposed rezoning
complies with the provisions
of the Murrayville Community
Plan.

H.1
Page 2 . . .
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That Council give first and second reading to Bylaw No. 4693 rezoning 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land
located at 21726 – 49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a five (5) lot single
family subdivision, subject to the following development prerequisites being satisfied prior to
final reading:
1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no significant trees be

removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of services) until
tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisfaction of the
Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;
That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public hearing.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Quinn Jeannotte has applied to rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 – 49A Avenue
to Residential Zone R-1D. The rezoning will facilitate the subsequent subdivision of five (5) fully
serviced single family lots. The Murrayville Community Plan designates the lands as “Single
Family Two” allowing subdivisions having a minimum lots size of 650 m2 (7,000 ft2). Staff
supports the rezoning proposal as it complies with the Murrayville Community Plan.
PURPOSE:
This report is to advise and make recommendations with respect to rezoning application number
RZ100311.

H.1
Page 3 . . .
SUBJECT

H.1
Page 4 . . .
ZONING BYLAW NO. 2500
R-1D
R-1D
R-1D

H.1
Page 5 . . .
Preliminary Subdivision Plan – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT
217A
Street

H.1
Page 6 . . .
Conceptual Block Plan – SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT
217A
Street
49 Avenue
48A Avenue

H.1
Page 7 . . .
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Owner: Tanzite Ventures Inc.
4038 – 200B Street
Langley, BC V3A 1N9
Applicant: Quinn Jeannotte

2201 – 204A Street
Langley, BC V2Z 2A2
Legal Description: Lot 37 Section 6 Township 11

New Westminster District Plan 39985
PID: 008-695-938
Location: 21726 – 49A Avenue
Area: 0.40 ha (1acre)
Existing Zoning: Suburban Residential Zone SR-1

(minimum lot size 3,716 m2 / 0.92 acre)
Proposed Zoning: Residential Zone R-1D

(minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000 ft2).
Murrayville Community Plan: Single Family Two

(maximum density 15 units per ha / 6 units per
acre; minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000 ft2)
E.S.A. Designation: E.S.A.# 66 – Murrayville Urban Area (Rating - #3)
BACKGROUND:
a maximum residential density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minimum lot size
of 650 m2 (7,000 ft2). The current SR-1 zoning is reflective of minimum lot sizes in Murrayville
prior to development and the provision of full urban services. The subject lot is one of only four
(4) properties in the area that have not been rezoned to R-1D.
The proponent is applying to rezone approximately 0.40 ha (1.0 acre) of land located at 21726 –
49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a subsequent subdivision of five (5)
single family lots. The subject property is currently occupied by one single family home that will
be removed to accommodate the subdivision.
Adjacent Uses:
The subject site fronts 49A Avenue and is surrounded by single family homes zoned R-1D and
SR-1 (with lots ranging in size from 650m2 to 4,047m2). Although the lots to the east have
developed at the density permitted in the Murrayville Community Plan, the adjacent lots to the
west and south have further subdivision potential.

H.1
Page 8 . . .
Density:
a maximum density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minimum lot size of 650 m2
(7,000 ft2). The applicant proposes a subsequent subdivision application of five (5) single family
lots at a proposed density of 12 units per hectare (5 units per acre) with a minimum lot size of
650 m2 (7,000 ft2).
Subdivision:
A preliminary subdivision layout has been submitted in support of the rezoning proposing the
creation of five (5) single family residential lots. The applicant has also prepared a conceptual
block plan indicating the relationship of the subject site to the adjacent undeveloped lands. As
shown on the conceptual block plan, the introduction of a cul-de-sac to the block protects the
future subdivision potential of these surrounding currently over-sized properties. Subdivision
details, including dedication of the cul-de-sac, will be addressed at time of subdivision pursuant
to the Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw and Policy.
Servicing:
There are no servicing requirements for the proposed rezoning. Existing services are adequate
for the proposed use. At time of subdivision, a Servicing Agreement will be required to secure
construction of the east half of the proposed cul-de-sac (217A Street), installation of full urban
municipal services (water, sanitary, storm) to service the proposed lots in accordance with the
Township’s Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw, and erosion and sediment control
works in accordance with the Township’s Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw.
Tree Protection:
In compliance with the Tree Protection Bylaw, the applicant has submitted a tree survey and
tree summary schedule indicating that there are three (3) significant trees located on the subject
site. Based on the preliminary subdivision layout, all of the significant trees will likely be
removed. As a result, the applicant will be required to plant 30 replacement trees at time of
subdivision. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no significant
trees be removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of services)
until tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisfaction of the
Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision is required as a condition of
final reading.
Transit:
Translink currently operates two Community Shuttles through Murrayville with stops on 48
Avenue, as well as a regular bus route along Fraser Highway. The road layout for Murrayville
has been designed to accommodate future transit routes in accordance with Translink’s
operating policy / procedures, which Council is given an opportunity to review each year.
Environment:
The Township’s Environmentally Sensitive Areas Study identifies the lands as forming part of
the Murrayville Urban Area. The applicant will be required to provide full urban services as well
as a storm water management plan and sediment control measures through a servicing
agreement. The provision of these items along with compliance with the Township’s Tree
Protection Policy satisfies the management guidelines identified in the Township’s
Environmentally Sensitive Areas Study. There are no watercourses onsite.

H.1
Page 9 . . .
Schools:
The subject site is located within the catchment area for James Hill Elementary School,
approximately 1.5 kilometres southeast of the subject site. Langley Fundamental Elementary
School is located 1 block north of the subject site. High school students will attend Langley
Secondary School.
Parks:
There are two parks in the vicinity of the subject site. Denny Ross Memorial Park located
southeast of the site on Old Yale Road. Porter Park is located west of the site on 215 Street.
Development Prerequisites:
Prior to final reading of the rezoning bylaw, the following items must be completed:
1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no significant trees

be removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of services)
until tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisfaction
of the Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning application as the proposed development complies
with the land use and density policies of the Murrayville Community Plan. Subdivision details
will be addressed at the subdivision stage pursuant to the Township’s Subdivision and
Development Control Bylaw and Policy.
Teresa Hanson
DEVELOPMENT PLANNER
for
TEH/the

H.1
ATTACHMENT B
September 15, 2008
Special Meeting for Public Hearing and Development Permits Minutes - 401 -
B. PUBLIC HEARING
3. Rezoning Application RZ100311

(Jeannotte/Tanzite)
Bylaw 4693
Report 08-135
File CD 11-06-0179
“Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500 Amendment (JEANNOTTE)

Bylaw 2008 No. 4693”.
Explanation - Bylaw No. 4693
J. Geraghty, Manager Development Planning, explained that Bylaw No. 4693

rezones 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 – 49A Avenue to Residential Zone
R-1D to accommodate a five (5) lot single family subdivision. He noted that 79
Public Hearing notices were mailed to area residents.
Explanation by the proponent.
Quinn Jeannotte, 2201 – 204A Street, was in attendance and commented on width
to depth ratio, in-fill sites, impact of homes facing 49A Avenue, a root barrier being
applied to aid tree preservation, and advised that 38 additional trees would be
planted.
Councillor Bateman left the meeting at 8:15 p.m. and rejoined the meeting at
8:17 p.m.
Submissions regarding Bylaw No. 4693 from the public.
1. Cleve Stordy, 21727 – 48A Avenue, was in attendance and commented that he
had made an enquiry at the Township of Langley to subdivide his property and
was advised that he could not. He continued that Mr. Jeannotte met with
Mr. Stordy and his neighbours in early 2008, advising them of the proposed
project and possible consolidation of excess rear yard lots. He submitted a 16-
signature petition in opposition of the proposal and attached an alternate
proposal for development in the area. He expressed concerns relative to lot
layout requiring removal of many existing structures, lot orientation, lack of good
community planning, and lack of heritage consideration.
2. Kim Stordy, 21727 – 48A Avenue, was in attendance and commented that the
neighbourhood and community should work together to plan a development
through mutual cooperation.
3. Jean and Alan Gregson, 21692 – 49A Avenue, were in attendance and
commented that they had concerns regarding tree preservation on the east side
of their property, fencing, drainage, and compensation should there be any
damage to their trees or fencing.
4. April Miko, 21654 – 49A Avenue, was in attendance and commented that she
was speaking on behalf of her mother, Sharlene Stewart, who had expressed
concerns relative to lack of notification, effect of development on the back of her
property, protection of stream at the rear of her property, subdivision
39 of 89
H.1
September 15, 2008
Special Meeting for Public Hearing and Development Permits Minutes - 402 -
B. PUBLIC HEARING
possibilities, and drainage issues.
5. Doug Speranza, 21693 – 46A Avenue, was in attendance and commented that
he had concerns relative to tree preservation, location of proposed road,
drainage issues, and that he was opposed to the project.
6. Mr. and Mrs. David Lapierre, 4849 - 217B Street, were in attendance and
commented that they had concerns relative to tree preservation, historical
atmosphere, decrease in property value, and loss of privacy. Mrs. Lapierre
continued that she also spoke on behalf of Mrs. Pam Erickson at 21734 – 48
Avenue in saying that the neighbours would like to participate in a public open
house.
7. Doug Heck, 21679 - 48A Avenue, was in attendance and commented that he
was opposed to the proposal.
8. Margaret Wallbank, 21665 – 48A Avenue, was in attendance and commented
that she had concerns relative to lack of notification
9. Robert Garden, 21651 – 48A Avenue was in attendance and commented that he
had concerns relative to lot layout and skewing of property lines, access for
emergency vehicles, and advised that he was opposed to the proposal.
Written Submissions regarding Bylaw No. 4693 from the public.
The following persons had expressed opposition in writing regarding Bylaw

No. 4693:
1. Opal and Robert Garden, 21651 – 48A Avenue

2. Margaret and Lorne Wallbank, 21665 – 48A Avenue
3. Pat and Doug Heck, 21679 – 48A Avenue
4. Barb and Vince Moropito, 4904 – 216 Street
5. Laurel and Raymond Matthew, 21687 - 48A Avenue
6. Kim and Doug Speranza, 21693 – 48A Avenue
7. Kris and Doug Hyde, 21745 – 48A Avenue
8. Kim and Cleve Stordy, 21727 – 48A Avenue.
Councillors Ferguson and Fox left the meeting at 8:42 p.m. and rejoined the meeting
at 8:43 p.m.
4. Rezoning Application RZ100307 and

Development Permit DP100542
(Sherwood Park Homes Ltd.)
Bylaw No. 4669
Report 08-134
File CD 08-14-0163
“Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500 Amendment (Sherwood Park
Homes Ltd.) Bylaw 2008 No. 4669”.
40 of 89
ATTACHMENT C
H.1
September 29, 2008
Regular Council Meeting Minutes - 429 -
Development;
d) Landscaping and boulevard treatment to be secured by letter of credit at the
building permit stage;
e) Signage to be in substantial compliance with Schedule “G”;
f) All garbage facilities to be located within buildings or screened;
g) Rooftop mechanical equipment to be located so as not to be visible from adjacent
roads, or alternatively to be screened from view by compatible architectural
treatments;
h) Compliance with the Township’s Exterior Lighting Impact Policy (submission of an
exterior lighting impact plan) to the acceptance of the Manager of Permits and
Licences;
i) Submission of a final CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)
report addressing incorporation of CPTED principles into the development design
to the acceptance of the Manager of Development Planning.
Although not part of the Development Permit requirements, the applicant is advised
that prior to issuance of a building permit the following items will need to be finalized:
l) Payment of supplemental Development Permit application fees.

CARRIED
Councillor Richter opposed
6. Rezoning Application RZ100311

(Jeannotte / Tanzite)
Bylaw No. 4693
Report 08-135
File CD 11-06-0179
Moved by Councillor Long,

Seconded by Councillor Ferguson,
That Council give third reading to “Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987 No.
2500 Amendment (JEANNOTTE) Bylaw 2008 No. 4693”.
REFERRAL
Moved by Councillor Long,

Seconded by Councillor Vickberg,
That Rezoning Application RZ100311 (Jeannotte / Tanzite) be referred to staff to
address the comments received at the September 15, 2008 Public Hearing.
CARRIED
41 of 89
ATTACHMENT D
H.1
42 of 89
H.1
43 of 89
H.1
44 of 89
H.1
45 of 89
ATTACHMENT E
H.1
46 of 89
H.1
47 of 89
H.1
48 of 89
H.1
49 of 89
H.1
50 of 89
H.1
51 of 89
H.1
52 of 89
H.1
53 of 89
H.1
54 of 89
H.1
55 of 89
H.1
56 of 89
H.1
57 of 89
H.1
58 of 89
H.1
59 of 89
H.1
60 of 89
H.1
61 of 89
H.1
62 of 89
H.1
63 of 89
H.1
64 of 89
H.1
65 of 89
H.1
66 of 89
H.1
67 of 89
H.1
68 of 89
H.1
69 of 89
H.1
70 of 89
H.1
71 of 89
H.1
72 of 89
H.1
73 of 89
H.1
74 of 89
H.1
75 of 89
H.1
76 of 89
H.1
77 of 89
H.1
78 of 89
H.1
79 of 89
H.1
80 of 89
H.1
81 of 89
H.1
82 of 89
H.1
83 of 89
H.1
84 of 89
H.1
85 of 89
H.1
86 of 89
H.1
87 of 89
H.1
SUMMARY OF RESPONSES (FEBRUARY 5, 2009 OPEN HOUSE)
(NOTE: Some questionnaires were received from properties outside this map area)
Subject
Prefer the Original Layout (half cul-de-sac subdivision plan) (4%)
Prefer the Alternate Layout (panhandle subdivision plan) (52%)
Prefer Neither Layout (37%)
Prefer Neither Layout, but Prefer the Alternate Layout over the Original Layout (7%)
No Response
Conceptual Block Plan area
(NOTE: Percentage values based on number of persons and include responses outside the map area)
88 of 89
H.1
89 of 89

ToL - 09 - 14 - 09 - Regular Council Agenda Package

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

ToL - 09 - 14 - 09 - Regular Council Agenda Package

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

REGULAR MEETING OF

1-9 1. Regular Council Meeting – August 31, 2009

Recommendation that Council adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council

C. DELEGATIONS (UP TO 5 DELEGATIONS)

E. BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING

F. BYLAWS FOR FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD READING

G. BYLAWS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THIRD READING

11-89 1. Rezoning Application RZ100311

Recommendation that Council give final reading to “Township of Langley

Explanation – Bylaw No. 4693

Clerk’s Note: Community Development advises that all development prerequisites

Present: Mayor Green

Councillors J. Bateman, B. Dornan, S. Ferguson, C. Fox, M. Kositsky, B. Long,

M. Bakken, P. Catlin, D. Leavers and R. Seifi

1. Regular Council Meeting – July 20, 2009

Moved by Councillor Bateman,

C. DELEGATIONS (UP TO 5 DELEGATIONS)

Bruce Taylor and Lyall Sharman of Aldergrove Minor Baseball appeared

The agenda order was varied.

C. DELEGATIONS (UP TO 5 DELEGATIONS)

Art Bandenieks a representative of the Aldergrove Youth Soccer Club and

2. Heath MacKenzie and Russ Simpson

Heath MacKenzie and Russ Simpson of Langley Mountain Bike Association

The original order of the agenda then resumed.

Brad Ricketts appeared before Council to discuss possible opportunities to

5. John and Marilyn Thomson

John and Marilyn Thomson appeared before Council to discuss speeding

Rodney Blackwell appeared before Council regarding the Fort Langley

The community is planning a meeting on September 24, 2009 has invited

C. DELEGATIONS (UP TO 5 DELEGATIONS)

Madeleine De Little appeared before Council on behalf of Helen Smith to

Grant Rawstron, Fort Langley Canoe Club appeared before Council to

1. Aldergrove Athletic Park Concept Plan

Moved by Councillor Fox,

Moved by Councillor Richter,

Councillor Ward opposed

2. Provincial Agricultural Land Commission Application No. 100179

Moved by Councillor Ward,

Councillor Ferguson opposed

3. Rezoning Application No. 100333

The report was withdrawn.

E. BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING

1. Rezoning Application No. 100330

Moved by Councillor Fox,

1. Applicant entering into a Servicing Agreement with the Township to

E. BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING

General Manager of Engineering;

a) Building plans being in substantial compliance with Schedules “A”

E. BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING

e) All garbage facilities to be located within buildings or screened;

Although not part of the Development Permit requirements, the applicant is

h) Payment of supplemental Development Permit application fees.

2. Rezoning Application No. 100339

Moved by Councillor Ferguson,

1. Completion of the required road, utility, landscaping and greenway

E. BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING

the time of subdivision;

a) Completion of an exterior design control agreement ensuring that

F. BYLAWS FOR FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD READING

G. BYLAWS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THIRD READING

H. BYLAWS FOR FINAL ADOPTION

1. Rezoning Application No. 100315