Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Jared Ganley
Although William Blake and Percy Bysshe Shelley saw Satan as the real hero of
Paradise Lost, and applauded his rebellion against the tyranny of Heaven, I would
disagree with their interpretation of the character. I have a very hard time
believing that Milton intended (or for that matter accidentally created) the
character Lucifer as anything other than one of the best-written foils for the
behavior of other, less-interesting-but-more-important-to-the-stated-intent-of-
the-author, characters. Though I like the character of Lucifer, I cannot claim
that he is in any way heroic. Lucifer is the natural result of the sort of
compositional sleights-of-hands necessary to make abstract and uncertain biblical
names seem to breathe, want, and will.
If a character is to be sympathetic to the reader, the reader must be able to see
some commonality between his or her individual human state and that of the
character portrayed. Keep in mind that in endeavoring to “…justifie the wayes of
God to men (26)”, Milton was rather limited in how he could animate his players.
Since the language and the experience of Milton’s audience is limited to those
things that the human mind can clearly and distinctly conceive; and since the
sympathy of one’s audience depends on the accuracy and eloquence of the author’s
description of the human condition, Milton had to find a way to depict things that
were beyond human reckoning using the limited human language. Just as Milton had
to describe Eden using only language and symbols that were knowable in what he had
experienced as the fallen and imperfect world, he had to represent God, The
Messiah, the angles of heaven and hell, as well as sinless Adam and Eve in human
terms. The problem in characterizing beings that by definition lack human
qualities is that those beings naturally lack any sympathetic characteristics.
That Milton was able to create so a vivid and compelling a character as Lucifer is
a tribute to his insight into the human condition. But how he executed his vision
with such intensity; in my opinion making Lucifer the most human (using “human”
here to mean sympathetic and identifiable for the reader) of his characters, may
cause some confusion for his readers. I believe that though the character of
Lucifer is the most beautifully written being in Paradise Lost, Milton provides
adequate reason and evidence to read that character as an antagonist, a villain,
and a foil, not the hero of Paradise Lost.
So what then is a hero? The heroes of the Iliad and the Odyssey possess the
commonality action in the face of mortality. The Homeric hero performs his duty
despite his awareness that he is subject to the most powerful force in the Greek
reckoning of nature- death. As the heroes of Homer’s epics confront their own
mortality in armed combat, they engage in the exposition of the most necessary of
the heroic virtues - a willingness to risk all the earthly pleasures of life,
family, and wealth. This voluntary (though not completely in the case of
Odysseus) venture to garner personal glory through living (and perhaps dying)
bravely, meeting civic duty, and potentially securing the same risked earthly
pleasures of life, family, and wealth, is what distinguishes the hero from other
character types.
Those readers who are taken in by Lucifer’s rhetoric in the first two books of
Paradise Lost may perhaps see Lucifer as having many, if not all of these traits.
After all, wasn’t Lucifer willing to incur the wrath of the most powerful being in
the Christian conception of the world on a question of principal? While Achilles
and Odysseus courted only death, Lucifer gambled eternal damnation against the
maintenance of his own pride. One could argue that Lucifer’s willingness to risk
his place among the angles, to possibly lose perfect heavenly bliss without end,
and the incur wrath of the most powerful being in the universe to validate his own
pride is a perfect mirror of the Homeric hero.
We should not be so easily fooled. When Lucifer first broke with God and led his
troops into open revolt, he had no conception of the risk he took. In fact all of
Lucifer’s actions may be interpreted as being based in his own fundamental
misunderstanding of the sprit and nature of God. Lucifer immediately illustrates
the elemental error in his knowledge as he refers to the power that thrust the
fallen out of Heaven: “…so much the stronger provd / He with his Thunder: and till
then who knew / The force of those dire Arms? (92-94)” In his pride Lucifer never
considered the possibility that he could be defeated, so in his undertaking revolt
against God he could not have consciously known he risked anything. Equally,
since Lucifer was the first to ever challenge God, he had no model from which to
gauge the power or the wrath of God. Lucifer’s ignorance, through his own gross
miscalculation of God, makes it impossible for his actions to be seen as heroic.