EF E)3,054-3%0) Caves are naLural carvlngs from whlch our ancesLors beneflLed probably slnce Lhe end of Lhe arboreal llfe and Lhe beglnnlng of blpedallsm. LlLher for permanenL, accldenLal, occaslonal or perlodlcal vlslLs Lhelr acLlvlLles lefL archaeologlcally deLecLlble Lraces. 1hanks Lo Lhe naLure of caves Lhls arLefacLs are ofLen well preserved ln naLurally overlylng sedlmenLs. WlLh careful excavaLlons we are able Lo reconsLrucL Lhls sedlmenLaLlon processes, and mark Lhe dlfferences and slmllarlLles beLween Lhe layers. AfLer a relaLlvely long hlsLory of cave and open slLe excavaLlon, Loday we are able Lo reconsLrucL Lhe general evoluLlon paLh of human klnd and Lhe developmenL of our culLure. 1hroughouL LhaL paLh Lhere are several evenLs whlch by some auLhors are consldered mllesLones" ln human evoluLlon. 1hese evenLs, regardless of Lhelr naLure, mark Lhe leap" of human klnd from one evoluLlonary level Lo anoLher. kleln recognlzes four dlfferenL evenLs: a) around 2,3 Ma-Lhe appearance of sLone Lools, b) 1,7 Ma-pro-modern" body proporLlons and Lhe lnvenLlon of handaxes, c) 600 ka-rapld braln-slze growLh, d) around 30 ka-arL and Lhe fully modern ablllLy Lo lnvenL and manlpulaLe culLure" (kleln 2002). 1hls lasL achlevemenL of manklnd, besldes elsewhere, was also documenLed ln cave slLes from CenLral Lurope. LlLher as small flgurlnes or wall palnLlngs, Lhe earllesL arL ln Lurope was dlscovered ln vogelherd, PohlensLeln, Pohle lels, ChauveL and oLher Aurlgnaclan slLes ln SW Cermany and lrance. 1hls speclflc change ln culLure (as generally accepLed) marks Lhe arrlval of Lhe flrsL anaLomlcally modern human and Lhe beglnnlng of Lhe Luropean upper aleollLhlc. 8uL before any furLher explanaLlon of Lhe culLural meanlng of Lhese changes, a raLher phllosophlcal dlgresslon ls necessary. MosL adequaLe seems Lhe work of a Cerman LgypLologlsL !an Assmann on collecLlve memory and culLural ldenLlLy".
EEF =0''4)%-(3%>/ ()5 -4&34,(& '/'0,@ Many auLhors have dlscussed Lhe role LhaL collecLlve memory has ln Lhe process of generaLlng culLure and ldenLlLy (Assmann 1993, 2003 and furLher ref.). Assmann sees collecLlve memory as a consLlLuLlon of each and every ones lndlvldual memory, developed by Lhe process of soclallzaLlon. ln order Lo malnLaln lLs sLablllLy, Lhls memory needs Lo be Lled Lo cerLaln maLerlal ob[ecLs called mnemonlc devlces. 1haL way Lhese forms galn meanlng and a fuslon beLween Lhe maLerlal and Lhe absLracL ls achleved. 1hese mnemonlc devlces become reference polnLs for Lhe collecLlve memory (Assmann 2003). ln hls furLher elaboraLlons Assman dlsLlngulshes Lwo Lypes of collecLlve memory. 1he flrsL one ls communlcaLlve memory. lL ls Lhe memory lnvolved ln slmple everyday communlcaLlon, connecLed Lo slmple everyday maLLers. 1he llmlLed Lemporal horlzon characLerlsLlc for Lhls memory moves as Llme flows and goes back ln Lhe pasL elghLy Lo a hundred years (Lhree generaLlons) (Assmann 1993). 1he second aspecL of Lhe collecLlve memory ls Lhe culLural. 1he culLural memory ls besL descrlbed ln Lhe followlng consLrucLlon, whlch Assman borrows from nleLzsche: a collecLlve concepL for all knowledge LhaL dlrecLs behavlor and experlence ln Lhe lnLeracLlve frame-work of a socleLy and one LhaL obLalns Lhrough generaLlons ln repeaLed socleLal pracLlce and lnlLlaLlon". 1he Lemporal horlzon of Lhe culLural memory does noL change wlLh Lhe passlng of Llme. lL has a flxed sLarLlng polnL - falLhful evenLs from Lhe pasL whlch are engraved ln Lhe collecLlve experlence, Lhelr meanlng crysLalllzed ln Lhe form of Lhe mnemonlc flgures, and wlLh Lhe help of Lhese flgures Lhose evenLs are re-accesslble across mlllennla (Assmann 1993).
EEEF G(-B 30 (,-.(/0&01@ Where ls Lhe connecLlon beLween Assmann's vlew on collecLlve memory and Aurlgnaclan maLerlal culLure (especlally lLs arL)? Slnce Lhelr flrsL dlscovery ln Lhe fourLh decade of Lhe LwenLleLh cenLury Lhere have been many aLLempLs Lo lnLerpreL Lhe sLrange llLLle lvory flgurlnes of large lce Age mammals, found ln vogelherd cave ln SW Cermany. LaLer, as more dlscovered flgurlnes from oLher CenLral Luropean slLes were added Lo Lhls assemblage, Lhe number and complexlLy of Lhelr lnLerpreLaLlons also grew (uowson and orr 2001). l wlll presenL here Lhe vlew of MarLln orr, whlch lnLegraLes very well Lhe Aurlgnaclan archeologlcal record from SW Cermany wlLhln Lhe phllosophlcal framework seL by Assmann. Pe beglns hls analyses wlLh observaLlon on Lhe Lechnologlcal process of manufacLurlng dlfferenL elemenLs of Lhe Aurlgnaclan maLerlal culLure, from raw maLerlal acqulslLlon Lo Lhelr dlscard ln Lhe conLexL Lhey were dlscovered by archaeologlsLs. 1aklng ln conslderaLlon Lhe relaLlve amounL of lnvesLed efforL ln manufacLurlng an lLem and lLs ldlosyncrasy (level of sLandardlsaLlon), orr consLrucLed a dlagram (llg.1).
llg. 1: roducLs of culLural and communlcaLlve memory ln Lhe Aurlgnaclan of souLhwesL Cermany (orr 2010),
As a resulL, he poslLlons relaLlvely accuraLe ln Lhls dlagram all Lhe producLs reLrleved from excavaLlons: from sLone Lools Lo flguraLlve sLaLueLLes. 1he maln ldea ls Lo connecL Lhe producLs wlLh Lhe adequaLe collecLlve memory, dependlng on Lhelr characLerlsLlcs. lollowlng Assmann and hls Lwo aspecLs of Lhe collecLlve memory, orr dlvldes Lhe Aurlgnaclan producLs ln Lwo groups. 1he flrsL group of arLefacLs are Lhe mnemonlc devlces", Lhe maLerlal form of Lhe communlcaLlve memory. As Lhe naLure of Lhe memory Lype Lhey represenL, Lhese arLefacLs would be characLerlzed by hlgh level of sLandardlsaLlon and relaLlvely low amounL of efforL and consclous concern lnvesLed (Lhey are producLs of everyday llfe rhyLhm). 1hey are producLs of repeLlLlve pracLlces and derlve from subslsLlng needs. 1hls group lncludes: Aurlgnaclan sLone Lools, reLouchers, awls and pollshers. roducLlon of lvory beads and Lhe so called pro[ecLlle polnLs" demand relaLlvely hlgh amounL of lnvesLed efforL, buL because of Lhelr sLunnlngly hlgh level of sLandardlsaLlon Lhey are also lncluded ln Lhls group. 1he second caLegory lncludes arLefacLs whlch are consldered as maLerlallzed culLural memory. 1hey are all unlque whlch means Lhelr producLlon was lndlvlduallzed, Lhelr producers were hlghly skllled men or women, who lnvesLed a loL of lnLellecLual and physlcal efforL. 1hls group lncludes: above all Lhe lvory sLaLueLLes, few lvory baLons and some decoraLed bone and anLler reLouchers, bone and lvory fluLe and few pendanLs and plerced ob[ecLs. 1hese ob[ecLs (especlally Lhe sLaLueLLes) are qulLe small and probably were carrled around all Lhe Llme by lndlvlduals. 1haL would explaln why some of Lhem are plerced and almosL all of Lhem show clear slgns of pollsh. lurLhermore, Lhe sLaLueLLes were probably used by resLrlcLed group of people durlng ceremonles and speclal rlLuals for perlodlcal reconsLrucLlon of Lhe collecLlve culLural memory. Clven Lhe facL LhaL Lhese sLaLueLLes were made of common maLerlal for Lhe perlod, and Lhe noL-so-ceremonlal way Lhey were dlscarded, Lhe slgnlflcance of Lhese sLaLueLLes ls clearly Lhe process of Lhelr producLlon and Lhelr Lles and usage by lndlvlduals. 1he moblle characLer of Lhe sLaLueLLes and Lhe way Lhey were carrled around, orr connecLs wlLh Lhe early Aurlgnaclan flexlble and moblle soclal formaLlons wlLhln a landscape wlLhouL sLrong soclal boundarles and flxed communal locaLlons". Pe suggesLs LhaL ln Lhe followlng sLages of soclal developmenL when Lhe role of Lhe caves as flxed communal locaLlons" was more pronounced, Lhe wall palnLlngs Look over Lhe funcLlon of mnemonlc devlces" of culLural memory from Lhe small lvory sLaLueLLes. 1hls sLaLemenL ls sLrongly supporLed by Lhe absence of cave palnLlngs durlng Lhe sLaLueLLes relgn" and Lhe dlsappearance of Lhe sLaLueLLes when Lhe flrsL cave walls were palnLed (orr 2010).
8LlL8LnCLS: - Assmann, !., and Czapllcka, !., 1993: CollecLlve memory and culLural ldenLlLy. new Cerman CrlLlque, no. 63, CulLural PlsLory/CulLural SLudles, pp. 123-133 - Assmann, !., 2003 [1992]. !"# %&'(&)*''* +*,-./(01#2 3./)14(5 6)100*)&07 &0, 89'1(1#./* :,*0(1(-( 10 4);/*0 <9./%&'(&)*0. - uowson, 1. A., & orr, M. (2001). Speclal ob[ecLs-speclal creaLures. ShamanlsLlc lmagery and Lhe Aurlgnaclan arL of SouLhwesL Cermany. ln n. rlce (Ld.), 1he archaeology of Shamanlsm (pp. 163-177). - kleln 8C, Ldgar 8 (2002) 1he uawn of Puman CulLure (Wlley, new ?ork). - orr, M. (2010). alaeollLhlc arL as culLural memory. A case sLudy of Lhe Aurlgnaclan arL of SouLhwesL Cermany. Cambrldge Archaeologlcal !ournal, 20(1), 87-108.