39565

MOODLE

135
047585075

MOODLE

MOODLE

Moodle

Moodle

MOODLE

IEA 2006

2000

2001

MOODLE
MOODLE
MOODLE

MOODLE

MOODLE

MOODLE
MOODLEModular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment

Martin Dougiamas
http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moodle&variant=zh-tw
MOODLE
MOODLE
MOODLE

Moodle

89

(8)
81
(9)

(10)

87

(15)77
76
89
86

(16)

89
90

78


93

91

Rumelhart1977

Gagne1985


Hyde Bizar
1989
(1) (2) (3) (4)
(5)

(6)

(7)
(8) (9)
'(12)

(11)

(13)

(14) (15)
(16) (17)
(20)

(10)

(18)

(21)

(19)

(22)

(23) (24) (25)

(26) (27)
(28)

(29)

(30) (31)

ParisWinograd1990

(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36) (37)
(38) (39)

BrownPalincsar1984

89

84
Brown
1987

Brown&Palincsar1984
(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

2000
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

84PraisCrossLipson1984

2003

PearsonJohn
1998

365

1
2002

1996
1997

DoleDuffyPearson1991

10

11

12

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

(8)
(9)
(10)

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
NRP200017
181727 92
B

BC
BD

84

Williams1998

(1)
1.

2.
3.
4.
(2)

(3)
1.
2.
(4)

80

Stahl1985
SingerDonlans1.
2.3.4.5.
6.

w
w
whenwherewhowhatwhy
how

84

1.
W2.

BrownDay1983

80
FoosFisher1988

(2) BrownDay1983
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
(3) Johnson1983
1.
2.
PalincsarBrown1984

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
1.2. 3.
4.
1

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)

MOODL

1995

1995

1999

2002

BeanSteenwyk1984

RinehartErickson1986

Taylor198248

83421.
2.3.

848

Brown199020

915

1989

19988580

DaveyMcbride1986

Tregaskes1987152

12

2000

BBS
K12
2005

2007Blog

Blog
Blog

Blog
2

Blog

2007(60)

2008

2008

200426

26

4 Moodle

2-3-1 Moodle

95 Moodle Moodle

95

Moodle

Moodle

Moodle

95

Moodle

96 Moodle
65%

Moodle

63%

Moodle

97 Moodle

Moodle

Moodle
2

Moodle(Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment)

(Web-Based Learning, WBL)

(Course Management System, CMS)
Moodle

(95)Moodle(http://moodle.org)

Moodle
Moodle1.8.2
(http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moodle&variant=zh-tw)1.6.1

Moodle2-4-1
2-4-1 Moodle

WIKI

(2004)

Moodle2-4-2
2-4-2 Moodle

WIKI

()

Moodle

2-4-1

2-4-1

(
)/

10

2-4-2

2-4-2

1
2

(2-4-3)

2-4-3

(2-4-4)

2-4-4

(2-4-5)(2-4-6)

2-4-5

2-4-6

(2-4-7)

2-4-7

(2-4-8)

2-4-8

(2-4-9)

2-4-9

(2-4-10)

2-4-10

10

(2-4-11)

2-4-11
2004

12

(2-4-12)

2-4-12

2
3

(2-4-13)

2-4-13

(2-4-14)

2-4-14

(2-4-15)

2-4-15

3-1-1

32161632
6

80

MOODLE

198919952003

1.2.3.
W

2
1

2003

103-3-1
3-3-1

10

3
6

83
8
(1) W(2)

(3)

(7)

(4) 3
(5) W(6)

(8) 2
(9) (10)

(11)

(12)

1
(13) (14)

(15) (16)

(17) (18)
(19)

(20)
9

10
11

12 13

14 15 16

17

18

1998

2003

2004

MOODLE

MOODLE

10

SPSS

MOODLE

S01

S14

S09

S09
S30

S08

S17

3
1

23 4-1-1
4-1-1

27

23

23

32

32

4
1
235

3
1

239

56

910 11

12 13

14

15 16

17

8020
copyword

95

W
S
Who
What
Where
When
Why

How

S33
S23

S3
S4


S7
S12
W

4-2-1
84

4-2-1

MOODLE

S17
S32

S01

S09
S16
S8

S22

4-3-1

12

4-3-13

s22

s21

s24

s01

s17
MOODLE
1
2
3

s24

~~

s14
,s26

s25


s07

4-4-1

83.38

17.83

87.88

17.95

4-4-1
200820072008

4-4-2

11.49

2.49

12.00

2.37.

4-4-21995199920022007
2008

4-4-3

10

12

11

4-4-3

Pearson
1.000
.298
()
.
.098

32
32
Pearson
.298
1.000
()
.098
.

32
32

Pearson
.123
.128
()
.504
.486

32
32

Pearson
-.081
.129
()
.661
.480

32
32

Pearson
.114
-.001
()
.533
.998

32
32
Pearson
.693**
.212
()
.000
.244

32
32
Pearson
.286
.514**
()
.113
.003

32
32
**. 0.01 ()
*. 0.05 ()

.123
.504
32
.128
.486
32
1.000
.
32
.382*
.031
32
.108
.557
32
.049
.789
32
-.052
.776
32

-.081
.661
32
.129
.480
32
.382*
.031
32
1.000
.
32
.480**
.005
32
-.059
.749
32
.139
.449
32

.114
.693**
.286
.533
.000
.113
32
32
32
-.001
.212
.514**
.998
.244
.003
32
32
32
.108
.049
-.052
.557
.789
.776
32
32
32
.480**
-.059
.139
.005
.749
.449
32
32
32
1.000
.208
.166
.
.253
.363
32
32
32
.208
1.000
.168
.253
.
.359
32
32
32
.166
.168
1.000
.363
.359
.
32
32
32

Moodle

Moodle
Moodle

4-5-1

4-5-1 Moodle

10

11

182

207

163

175

255

401

170

284

347

239

232

20

27

26

13

41

65

31

36

41

162

190

157

149

242

360

164

219

316

203

191

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

312

253

167

150

159

313

249

171

201

213

569

32

53

13

42

20

47

290

200

158

147

146

271

229

170

201

208

522

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

276

159

163

294

373

293

342

248

435

143

16

33

25

23

74

16

135

270

157

147

261

348

270

268

232

300

138

s31

s20
s32

s22
4-5-2
4-5-2

150

150

200

300

400

14

4-5-2150300

4-5-3
4-5-3

Pearson
1.000
.382*
()
.
.031

32
32

Pearson
.382*
1.000
()
.031
.

32
32

Pearson
.108
.480**
()
.557
.005

32
32
Pearson
.049
-.059
()
.789
.749

32
32
Pearson
-.052
.139
()
.776
.449

32
32
Pearson
.250
-.039
()
.168
.834

32
32
*. 0.05 ()
**. 0.01 ()

.108
.049
.557
.789
32
32
.480**
-.059
.005
.749
32
32
1.000
.208
.
.253
32
32
.208
1.000
.253
.
32
32
.166
.168
.363
.359
32
32
.282
.216
.118
.234
32
32

-.052
.776
32
.139
.449
32
.166
.363
32
.168
.359
32
1.000
.
32
.035
.851
32

.250
.168
32
-.039
.834
32
.282
.118
32
.216
.234
32
.035
.851
32
1.000
.
32

4-5-3
10
9101

4-5-1 s31

14-5-1

Moodle

Moodle
Moodle

4-6-1

4-6-1 Moodle
26
20052
29

5710

4-6-2

4-6-2Moodle
18

4-6-3

4-6-3Moodle
6
31

2
87

4-6-4

4-6-4Moodle
2430
22
6

10 4-6-5

4-6-5Moodle
4
4

14

12 4-6-6

4-6-6Moodle

13
1

3 4

5
6

MOODLE

W8

MOODLE

Moodle
Moodle

Moodle

Moodle
26
18

2430

Moodle

Moodle

2008

2007
Moodle

2000

1992
5109-126
1999

2004

1995

2000

1997

1994

(1997)
2006
Moodle
()
(1995)


199111-49
2001
1998Kenneth S.Goodman
1998
451-18
2001
381-4
(2002)2639294
1989

1995

1998

1996
1988
2117-38
1989
(1994)
()
2000
2000

2002

2004

2005

2002

2006
Moodle

2007

1995-

2006
Moodle

2007Blog

2002

2004

2008

2000138
2026
2008
Moodle

19872(2)86-144
2003

2000

Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. 1984. The effect of three forms of summarization instruction
on six graders summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297-306
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more
mysterious mechanisms. In F.E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and
understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D.1983. Macrorules for summarizing textsThe development of
expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Brown, M. I. (1990). Improving reading comprehension of second grade studeDavey,B.,& McBride,S.(1986). Effects of question-generation on reading comprehension.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 256-252.
Dole , J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D.(1991). Moving from the old to the
new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61,
239-264.
Foos, P. W., & Fisher, R. P. (1988). Using tests as learning opportunities. JourGagne, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown and
Company.
Hyde, A. A., & Bizar, M. (1989). Thinking in contest. New York: Longman.
mastery of text. College Reading and Learning Assistance Technical Report ,85-10.
nal of Education Psychology, 80, 179-183.
nts through the use of Story Mapping.ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO.ED 322
468
Palincar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and
comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction,1(2),117-175.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehensionfostering and
comprehensionmonitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction,1(2), 117-175.
Paris, S. G. & Winograd, P.(1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning
instruction. In B. F. Jones & Idol, L.(Eds.) Dimensions of think and cognitive instruction (pp.
15-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G.1986. Some effects of summarization training

on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-438.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In Harry Singer & Robert B.
Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., 722-750). Newark, DE:
International Reading Association.
Stahl, N. A. (1985). Developing independent learners: Strategies and tactics for
Taylor, B.M.1982. Text structure and childrens comprehension and memory for expository
material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 323-340.
Tregaskes, M. R. (1987). Metacognitive strategies: Their effects on reading comprehension of
sixth grade social studies students. Doctoral Dissertation, Brigham Young University.
Williams, J. P. (1998). Improving comprehension of disabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 48,
213-238.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

1.Frit W. Went-
1985 2.30
75

6.

7.

8.
.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

--

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

1.

2.
3.
4.
5.

6.
7.

8.
9.
10.
11.

12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

14

11

13

11

12

18

15

14

10

10

11

13

10

14

10

10

11

14

10

10

14

13

12

10

13

11

12

12

12

11

13

10

15

10

13

14

16

10

21

15

11

16

17

14

18

10

12

10

11

10

11

23
2
0

11

15

14

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

15

16

Moodle