Various 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives in moderate to good yield have been prepared in a one-pot reaction. Reaction is green and economically viable.
Various 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives in moderate to good yield have been prepared in a one-pot reaction. Reaction is green and economically viable.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
Various 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives in moderate to good yield have been prepared in a one-pot reaction. Reaction is green and economically viable.
Direitos autorais:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
A green synthesis of benzimidazoles D Kathirvelan, P Yuvaraj, K Babu, Arasampattu S Nagarajan & Boreddy S R Reddy* Industrial Chemistry Laboratory, CSIR-Central Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Chennai 600 020, India E-mail: induchem2000@yahoo.com Received 27 June 2011; accepted (revised) 31 May 2013 Various 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives in moderate to good yield have been prepared in a one-pot reaction by condensation of o-phenylenediamine and an aldehyde in the presence of ammonium chloride as a catalyst at 80-90C. The reaction is green and economically viable. Keywords: o-Phenylenediamine, economically viable, green chemistry, benzimidazoles Benzimidazole moieties are a very important class of heterocyclic compounds that have many applications in pharmaceutical chemistry 1 . Based on their broad biological functions 2 , they are used in clinical medicine 3 as anti-ulcer, anti-tumor and anti-viral agents 4 . Also, these are being developed as DNA minor groove binding agents that have significant anti tumor activity 5 . In addition, these compounds also seen as ligands for transition metals in model biological systems 6 and they have potential use for treatment of diseases such as ischemia-repersion injury 7a , hypertension 7b and obesity 7c . Several synthetic methodologies are available for the synthesis of benzimidazoles. Generally, the condensation of o-phenylene diamine with carboxylic acids and their nitrile, imidates and orthoester 8
derivatives have been widely used for benzimidazole synthesis. Direct condensation of o-aryl diamine with aldehyde is not a good synthetic route for these molecules as it yields a complex mixture of 1,2- disubstituted benzimidazole and bis dihydrobenzi- midazole as side products 9 . But the use of transition metal catalysts namely copper (II) acetate 10 and lead tetra-acetate in these reactions afforded better results. Ruthenium 11 , palladium 12 and rhodium 13 catalysts have also been used. An alternative synthetic approach using [Fe(III)/Fe(II)] redox mediated 14 oxidation of Schiff base intermediates derived from o-phenyllenediamine and various aromatic hetrocyclic aldehydes gave the desired products.The use of bismuth chloride and rare earth metal triflates such as [Yb(OTf 3 )] and [Sc(Otf 3 )] have also been reported 15 . But, syntheses of 2- substituted benzimidazole using Ti (IV) isopropoxide and cumene isoprpoxide were recently reported 16 . Several of these reported procedures for the preparation of 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives were neither versatile nor compatible with differently substituted starting materials. They are associated with many practical difficulties. For example, use of high temperature for the polyphosphoric acid mediated condensation reaction led to the formation of by-products and benzimidazoles in low yield. Though rare-earth metal catalysts give better yields, the prohibitive cost of the catalysts make them unsuitable for industrial application. The high boiling point of nitrobenzene as solvent increases safety risks at high temperature and difficulties in removal from the product. Results and Discussion Benzimidazole derivatives were prepared by refluxing o-phenylene diamine and various substituted aldehydes using catalytic amount of NH 4 Cl in ethanol at 80-90C to afford moderate to good yields (Scheme I). The completion of the reaction was monitored by TLC (2:1, v/v, hexane:ethylacetate) as eluent. This methodology was applied to synthesize a library of 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives and the results are summarized in Table I. The electronic effects of the different substituted aldehydes have been investigated and it was observed that aldehydes having electron withdrawing groups afford good yield with shorter reaction times compared to aldehydes having electron donating groups. At the same time, aliphatic aldehydes reacted slowly with lower yields (10%). Aryl ketones such as benzophenone, acetophenone and their derivatives did not react with diamine. Furthermore, heteroaryl carboxaldehyde afforded good yields compared to substituted benzaldehyde derivatives. Products were confirmed by comparing with authentic sample (IR, NMR and MS). NH signal clearly appeared in the region between 12.5 to 13.5 in 1 H NMR and quarternary carbon appeared around 150-155 in 13 C NMR as expected. The molecular ion peak appeared at respective m/z values in ESI-MS spectrometry. NOTES
1153
Scheme I Synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives
Table I Yield of benzimidazoles 3a-o with various R groups
Compd R Reaction time (h) Yield (%) 3a N H N OMe
3.0 78 3b
3.0 76 3c
3.0 65 3d N H N
2.5 63 3e
3.0 67 3f
3.0 80 3g
2.5 78 3h
4.0 74 Contd
INDIAN J. CHEM., SEC B, AUGUST 2013
1154 Experimental Section
All chemicals were purchased from Aldrich and SD Fine Chemical Company. Starting materials and reagents were used without further purification. IR spectra were recorded on Perkin Elmer 1700 spectrometer. The NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL-500 or an ACF-500 Bruker instrument using DMSO-d 6 as solvent and trimethylsilane as internal standard. The chemical shifts were expressed in units of parts per million (ppm) and the coupling constants were in Hertz (Hz). Splitting patterns described apparent multiplicities and were designated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiple), or br s (broad singlet). Mass spectra (MS) were recorded using ESI (Electrospray ionization) technique on Mariner Mass Spectrum instrument. Synthesis of benzimidazole derivative 3a To a mixture of o-phenylenediamine (0.100 g, 0.92 mmol) and anisaldehyde (0.125 g, 0.92 mmol) in 4 mL of ethanol was added NH 4 Cl (0.15g, 30 mol%). The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 h at 80C. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC (ethylacetate: hexane, 1:2 v/v). The reaction mixture was poured into ice cold water and the product was precipitated as a pale yellow solid. The contents were filtered and the product was washed with water twice and it was dried and purified by recrystallization from ethanol to give pure product 3a. The same procedure was used for all other compounds. Spectral data 2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole 3a: Pale yellow solid. Yield 80%. m.p. 216-18C;
Table I Yield of benzimidazoles 3a-o with various R groups Contd
1156 (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): 12.0 (s, 1H, NH), 8.18-8.20 (m, 9H) and 7.22-7.24 (s, 1H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz,DMSO-d 6 ): 111.1, 118.6, 121.9, 126.2, 128.6, 129.5, 130.0, 134.8, 143.5, 151.0; ESI-MS: Calcd m/z 245.27 and Obsd m/z 246.00. 2-(Pyridin-3yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole 3n: Yellow solid. Yield 83%. m.p. 240-42C. IR (KBr): 3041, 1444, 1410, 1275, 926 cm -1 ; 1 H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): 13.0 (s, 1H, NH), 9.3 (s, 2H), 8.63 (d, 1H), 8.45 (d, 1H), 7.57 (m, 4H), 7.2 (d, 2H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): 112.3, 122.6, 124.6, 126.6, 134.3, 147.9, 149.3, 151.0; ESI-MS: Calcd m/z 195.21 and Obsd m/z 194.5. 2-(Thiophen-2yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole 3o: Pale yellow solid. Yield 70%. m.p. 246-48C. IR (KBr): 3046, 1444, 1410, 1275, 970, 745 cm -1 ; 1 H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): 12.7 (s, 1H, NH), 7.95 (m, 2H, C2-H, C6-H), 7.25-7.35 (m,5H, C4-H, C7-H, C3-H, C4-H, C5-H), 7.05 (m, 2H, C5-H, C6-H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): 111.1, 118.6, 121.9, 126.2, 128.6, 129.5, 130.0, 134.8, 143.5, 151.0; ESI-MS: Calcd m/z 200.25, Obsd m/z 201.01. Acknowledgements DK and PY thank the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi (No. SR/S1/PC-33/2006) for the Junior Research Fellowship and Project Fellowship respectively. References 1 (a) Bhattacharya S & Chaudhuri P, Curr Med Chem, 15, 2008, 1762; (b) Horton D A, Bourne G T & Smythe M L, Chem Rev, 103, 2003, 893; (c) Boiani M & Gonzalez M, Mini-Rev Med Chem, 5, 2005, 409. 2 (a) Denny W A, Rewcastle G W & Baguley B C, J Med Chem, 33, 1990, 814; (b) Labanauskas L K, Brukstus A B, Gaidelis P G, Buchinskaite V A, Udrenaite V A & Dauksas V K, Pharm Chem J, 34, 2000, 353; (c) Can-Eke B, Puskullu M O, Buyukbingol E & Iscan M, Chem Biol Interact, 113, 1998, 65; (d) Benazzouz A, Boraud T, Dubedat P, Boireau A, Stutzmann J & Gross C, Eur J Pharmacol, 284, 1995, 299; (e) Sevak R, Paul A, Goswami S & Santini D, Pharmacol Res, 2007. 3 (a) Preston P N, Chem Rev, 74, 1974, 279; (b) Al Muhaimeed H, J Int Med Res, 25, 1997, 175; (c) Scott L J, Dunn C J, Mallarkey G & Sharp M, Drugs, 62, 2002, 1503; (d) Venkatesan P, J Antimicrob Chemother, 41, 1998, 145. 4 (a) Preston P N, Stevens M F G & Tennant G, Benzimidazoles and Congeneric Tricyclic Compounds, Part 2, (John Wiley and Sons New York) 1980; (b) Cedillo-River R & Munoz O, J Med Microbiol, 37, 1992, 221; (c) Chavez B, Cedillo-Rivera R & Martiner-Palomo A, J Protozool, 39, 1992, 510; (d) Navarrete-Vazquez G, Cedillo R, Hernandez-Campos A, Yepez L, Hernandez-Luis F, Valdez J, Morales R, Cortes R, Hernandez M & Castillo R, Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 11, 2001, 187. 5 Tanious F A, Hamelberg D, Bailly C, Czarny A, Boykin D W & Wilson W D, J Am Chem Soc, 126, 2004, 143. 6 Oren I Y, Yalcin I, Sener E A & Ucarturk N, Eur J Med Chem, 39, 2004, 291. 7 (a) Zhu G D, Gandhi V B, Gong J, Thomas S, Luo Y, Liu X, Shi Y, Klinghofer V, Johnson E F, Frost D, Donawho C, Jarvis K, Bouska J, Marsh K C, Rosenberg S H, Giranda V L & Penning T D, Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 18, 2008, 3955; (b) Ogino Y, Ohtake N, Nagae Y, Matsuda K, Moriya M, Suga T, Ishikawa M, Kanesaka M, Mitobe Y, Ito J, Kanno T, Ishiara A, Iwaasa H, Ohe T, Kanatanitani A & Fukami T, Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 18, 2008, 5010; (c) Shah D I, Sharma M, Bansal Y, Bansal G & Singh M, Eur J Med Chem, 43, 2008, 1808. 8 Dudd L M, Venardou E, Garcia-Verdugo E, Licence P, Blake A J, Wilson C & Poliakoff M, Green Chem, 5, 2003, 187. 9 Nagata K, Itoh T, Ishikawa H & Ohsawa A, Heterocycles, 61, 2003, 93. 10 Curini M, Epifano F, Montanari F, Rosati O & Taccone S, Synlett, 18, 2004, 32. 11 Chakrabarty M, Karmakar S, Ajanta M, Arima S & Harigaya Y, Heterocycles, 68, 2006, 967. 12 Aliyan H, Fazaeli R, Fazaeli N, Mssah A R, Naghash H J, Alizadeh M & Emami G, Heteroatom Chem, 20, 2009, 202. 13 Zhang Z H, Yin L & Wang Y M, Catal Commun, 8, 2007, 1126. 14 Brain C T & Brunton S A, Tetrahedron Lett, 43, 2002, 1893. 15 Anastasiou D, Campi E M, Chaouk H & Jackson W R, Tetrahedron, 48, 1992, 7467. 16 Wu Z, Rea P &Wickam G, Tetrahedron Lett, 41, 2000, 9871.