Digital Image Classification

iirs DIGITAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
POONAM S. TIWARI
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Division
Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari
iirs
Main lecture topics
• What is it and why use it?
• Image space versus feature space
• Distances in feature space
• Decision boundaries in feature space
• Unsupervised versus supervised training
• Classification algorithms
• Validation (how good is the result?)
• Problems

iirs What is Digital Image Classification
Multispectral classification is the process of sorting pixels
into a finite number of individual classes, or categories of
data, based on their data file values. If a pixel satisfies a
certain set of criteria , the pixel is assigned to the class
that corresponds to that criteria.
Multispectral classification may be performed using a
variety of algorithms
•Hard classification using supervised or unsupervised
approaches.
• Classification using fuzzy logic, and/or
•Hybrid approaches often involving use of ancillary
information.

iirs What is Digital Image
Classification
• grouping of similar
pixels
• separation of dissimilar
ones
• assigning class label to
pixels
• resulting in manageable
size of classes

iirs
CLASSIFICATION METHODS
MANUAL
• visual interpretation
• combination of spectral and spatial information
COMPUTER ASSISTED
• mainly spectral information
STRATIFIED
• using GIS functionality to incorporate
• knowledge from other sources of information

iirs
Why use it?
• To translate continuous variability of
image data into map patterns that
provide meaning to the user.
• To obtain insight in the data with
respect to ground cover and surface
characteristics.
• To find anomalous patterns in the
image data set.

iirs
Why use it? (advantages)
• Cost efficient in the analyses of large

data sets
• Results can be reproduced
• More objective then visual
interpretation
• Effective analysis of complex multi-
band (spectral) interrelationships

iirs
Dimensionality of
Data
• Spectral Dimensionality is determined by

the number of sets of values being used in
a process.
• In image processing, each band of data is
a set of values. An image with four bands
of data is said to be four-dimensional
(Jensen, 1996).

iirs
Measurement Vector
• The measurement vector of a pixel is the

set of data file values for one pixel in all n
bands.
• Although image data files are stored band-

by-band, it is often necessary to extract the
measurement vectors for individual pixels.

iirs

iirs
Mean Vector
•When the measurement vectors of several pixels
are analyzed, a mean vector is often calculated.
•This is the vector of the means of the data file
values in each band. It has n elements.
Mean Vector µI =

iirs Image space
Single-band Image Multi-band Image
• Image space (col,row)

• array of elements corresponding to reflected or
emitted energy from IFOV
• spatial arrangement of the measurements of the
reflected or emitted energy

iirs
Feature Space:
• A feature space image is simply a graph of
the data file values of one band of data
against the values of another band.
ANALYZING PATTERNS IN MULTISPECTRAL DATA
C
PIXEL A: 34,25
PIXEL B: 34,24
PIXEL C: 11,77 A
B

iirs One-dimensional feature space
Input layer
No distinction between classes
Distinction between classes

iirs Feature Space Multi-dimensional
Feature vectors

iirs Feature space (scattergram)
Low frequency
High
frequency
Two/three dimensional graph or scattered diagram

formation of clusters of points representing DN values in
two/three spectral bands.
Each cluster of points corresponds to a certain cover type on

ground
iirs
Distances and clusters in feature space
band y
. .
..
(units of 5 DN)
Max y
. ... .
(0,0) band x (units of 5 DN) Min y ..
Euclidian distance
(0,0) Min x Max x
Cluster

iirs Spectral Distance
Euclidean Spectral distance is distance in n- dimensional
spectral space. It is a number that allows two measurement
vectors to be compared for similarity. The spectral distance
between two pixels can be calculated as follows:
Where:
D = spectral distance
n = number of bands (dimensions)
i = a particular band
di = data file value of pixel d in band i
ei = data file value of pixel e in band i
This is the equation for Euclidean distance—in two dimensions (when n = 2), it
can be simplified to the Pythagorean Theorem (c2 = a2 + b2), or in this case:
D2 = (di - ei)2 + (dj - ej)2

iirs
Image classification process
2 4 Definition of the clusters in
Selection of the
the feature space
1 image data
5 Validation of the result

iirs
• It is also important for the analyst to realize that
there is a fundamental difference between
information classes and spectral classes.
• Information classes are those that human beings

define.
• Spectral classes are those that are inherent in

the remote sensor data and must be identified
and then labeled by the analyst.

iirs
SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION :
• The identity and location of some of the land cover types

such as urban, agriculture, wetland are known a priori
through a combination of field work and experience.
• The analyst attempts to locate specific sites in the

remotely sensed data that represent homogenous
examples of these known land cover types known as
training sites.
• Multivariate statistical parameters are calculated for

these training sites.
• Every pixel both inside and outside the training sites is

evaluated and assigned to the class of which it has the
highest likelihood of being a member.
iirs Supervised image classification
Steps in supervised
classification
• Identification of sample
areas (training areas)
• Partitioning of the A class sample
feature space • Is a number of
training pixels
•Forms a cluster in
feature space
A cluster
• Is the representative for
a class
• Includes a minimum
number of observations
(30*n)
• Is distinct
iirs
UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION
• The identities of land cover types to be specified
as classes within a scene are generally not
known a priori because ground reference
information is lacking or surface features within
the scene are not well defined.
• The computer is required to group pixels with
similar spectral characteristics into unique
clusters according to some statistically
determined criteria.
• Analyst then combine and relabels the spectral
clusters into information classes.

iirs
Supervised vs.
Unsupervised Training
• In supervised training, it is important to have a set of desired
classes in mind, and then create the appropriate signatures
from the data.
• Supervised classification is usually appropriate when you

want to identify relatively few classes, when you have
selected training sites that can be verified with ground truth
data, or when you can identify distinct, homogeneous regions
that represent each class.
• On the other hand, if you want the classes to be determined

by spectral distinctions that are inherent in the data so that
you can define the classes later, then the application is better
suited to unsupervised training. Unsupervised training
enables you to define many classes easily, and identify
classes that are not in contiguous, easily recognized regions.

iirs SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION
• In supervised training, you rely on your own

pattern recognition skills and a priori
knowledge of the data to help the system
determine the statistical criteria (signatures)
for data classification.
• To select reliable samples, you should know
some information—either spatial or
spectral—about the pixels that you want to
classify.

iirs Partition of a feature space
class a
• decide on
decision
class c boundaries
class b • assign a class

to each pixel
class d

iirs
Training Samples and
Feature Space Objects
• Training samples (also called samples)

are sets of pixels that represent what is
recognized as a discernible pattern, or
potential class. The system calculates
statistics from the sample pixels to create
a parametric signature for the class.

iirs
Selecting Training
Samples
• Training data for a class should be
collected from homogeneous environment.
• Each site is usually composed of many
pixels-the general rule is that if training
data is being collected from n bands then
>10n pixels of training data is to be
collected for each class. This is sufficient
to compute variance-covariance matrices
required by some classification algorithms.

iirs
There are a number of ways to collect training
site data-
•using a vector layer

• defining a polygon in the image
• using a class from a thematic raster
layer from an image file of the same
area (i.e., the result of an unsupervised
classification)

iirs
Evaluating Signatures
• There are tests to perform that can help

determine whether the signature data are a true
representation of the pixels to be classified for
each class. You can evaluate signatures that
were created either from supervised or
unsupervised training.

iirs
Evaluation of Signatures
• Ellipse—view ellipse diagrams and scatterplots of data file
values for every pair of bands.

iirs Evaluation of Signatures…………..
Signature separability is a statistical measure of distance between

two signatures. Separability can be calculated for any combination
of bands that is used in the classification, enabling you to rule out
any bands that are not useful in the results of the classification.
1. Euclidian Distance:
Where:
D = spectral distance
n = number of bands (dimensions)
i = a particular band
di = data file value of pixel d in band i
ei = data file value of pixel e in band i

iirs Signature Seperability………
2. Divergence

3. Transformed Divergence
The scale of the divergence values can range from 0 to 2,000. As a

general rule, if the result is greater than 1,900, then the classes can be
separated. Between 1,700 and 1,900, the separation is fairly good. Below
1,700, the separation is poor (Jensen, 1996).

4. Jeffries-Matusita Distance
Range of JM is between 0 and 1414. The JM distance has a saturating

behavior with increasing class separation like transformed divergence.
However, it is not as computationally efficient as transformed divergence”
(Jensen, 1996).

iirs SELECTING APPROPRIATE
CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM
• Various supervised classification algorithms may be
used to assign an unknown pixel to one of the classes.
• The choice of particular classifier depends on nature of
input data and output required.
• Parametric classification algorithms assume that the
observed measurement vectors Xc , obtained for each
class in each spectral band during the training phase are
Gaussian in nature.
• Non Parametric classification algorithms make no such
assumptions.
• There are many classification algorithms i.e.
Parallelepiped, Minimum distance, Maximum Likelihood
etc.

iirs PARALLELEPIPED CLASSIFICATION
ALGORITHM
¾ In the parallelepiped decision rule, the data file values of the
candidate pixel are compared to upper and lower limits. These
limits can be either:
1. the minimum and maximum data file values of each band in the
signature,
2. the mean of each band, plus and minus a number of standard
deviations, or
3. any limits that you specify, based on your knowledge of the data
and signatures.
¾ There are high and low limits for every signature in
every band. When a pixel’s data file values are between
the limits for every band in a signature, then the pixel is
assigned to that signature’s class.

iirs
• Therefore, if the low and high decision
boundaries are defined as
Lck= µck - Sck
and
Hck= µck + Sck
• The parallelepiped algorithm becomes
Lck ≤ BVijk ≤ Hck

iirs
Means and Standard Deviations Partitioned Feature Space

255 255
Band 2 Band 2
0 0
0 Band 1 255 0 Band 1 255
Feature Space Partitioning - Box classifier

iirs
Class “unknown”

iirs Points a and b are pixels in
the image to be classified.
Pixel a has a brightness value
of 40 in band 4 and 40 in
band 5. Pixel b has a
brightness value of 10 in band
4 and 40 in band 5. The boxes
represent the parallelepiped
decision rule associated with
a ±1s classification. The
vectors (arrows) represent the
distance from a and b to the
mean of all classes in a
minimum distance to means
classification algorithm.

iirs

iirs Overlap Region
In cases where a pixel may fall into the overlap

region of two or more parallelepipeds, you must
define how the pixel can be classified.
• The pixel can be classified by the order of the

signatures.
• The pixel can be classified by the defined

parametric decision rule.
• The pixel can be left unclassified.

iirs
ADVANTAGES:
Fast and simple.
Gives a broad classification thus narrows down the number of
possible classes to which each pixel can be assigned before more
time consuming calculations are made.
Not dependent on normal distributions.
DISADVANTAGES:
Since parallelepiped has corners, pixels that are actually quite far,
spectrally from the mean of the signature may be classified
Parallelepiped Corners
Compared to the
Signature Ellipse

iirs MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEANS
CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM
9 This decision rule is computationally simple and commonly
used.
9 Requires mean vectors for each class in each band µck from
the training data.
9 Euclidean distance is calculated for all the pixels with all the
signature means
D = √ (BVijk- µck)2 + (BVijl- µcl)2
Where
µck and µcl represent the mean vectors for class c measured in
bands k and l
9 Any unknown pixel will definitely be assigned to one of any
classes, there will be no unclassified pixel.

iirs
MINIMUM DISTANCE TO MEANS
Histogram of training set
300
200
100
0 31 63 95 127 159 191 223 255
Decision rule:
Priority to the shortest distance to the class mean

iirs Feature Space Partitioning - Minimum
Distance to Mean Classifier 255
"Unknown"
Mean vectors Band 2

255
0
Band 2 0 Band 1 255
255
0
0 Band 1 255
Band 2
0
0 Band 1 255
Threshold Distance

iirs
ADVANTAGES:
• Since every pixel is spectrally closer to
either one sample mean or other so there
are no unclassified pixels.
• Fastest after parallelepiped decision rule.
DISADVANTAGES:
• Pixels which should be unclassified will
become classified.
• Does not consider class variability.

iirs
Mahalanobis Decision Rule
• Mahalanobis distance is similar to minimum distance, except that
the covariance matrix is used in the equation. Variance and
covariance are figured in so that clusters that are highly varied lead
to similarly varied classes,

iirs
Advantages
• Takes the variability of classes into account, unlike
minimum distance or parallelepiped.
• May be more useful than minimum distance in cases
where statistical criteria (as expressed in the covariance
matrix) must be taken into account
Disadvantages
• Tends to overclassify signatures with relatively large
values in the covariance matrix.
• Slower to compute than parallelepiped or minimum
distance.
• Mahalanobis distance is parametric, meaning that it
relies heavily on a normal distribution of the data in each
input band.

iirs
Maximum Likelihood/Bayesian
Decision Rule
• The maximum likelihood decision rule is based on the
probability that a pixel belongs to a particular class. The
basic equation assumes that these probabilities are
equal for all classes, and that the input bands have
normal distributions.
• If you have a priori knowledge that the probabilities are
not equal for all classes, you can specify weight factors
for particular classes. This variation of the maximum
likelihood decision rule is known as the Bayesian
decision rule (Hord, 1982).

iirs The equation for the maximum likelihood/Bayesian classifier is as
follows:
The pixel is assigned to the class, c, for which D is the lowest.

iirs

iirs
Advantages
• The most accurate of the classifiers (if the input samples/clusters
have a normal distribution), because it takes the most variables into
consideration.
• Takes the variability of classes into account by using the covariance
matrix, as does Mahalanobis distance.
Disadvantages
• An extensive equation that takes a long time to compute. The
computation time increases with the number of input bands.
• Maximum likelihood is parametric, meaning that it relies heavily on a
normal distribution of the data in each input band.
• Tends to overclassify signatures with relatively large
values in the covariance matrix.

iirs UNSUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION
• It requires only a minimum amount of initial input from the
analyst.
• Numerical operations are performed that search for natural
groupings of the spectral properties of pixels.
• User allows computer to select the class means and
covariance matrices to be used in the classification.
• Once the data are classified, the analyst attempts a posteriori
to assign these natural or spectral classes to the information
classes of interest.
• Some clusters may be meaningless because they represent
mixed classes.
• Clustering algorithm used for the unsupervised classification
generally vary according to the efficiency with which the
clustering takes place.
• Two commonly used methods are-
– Chain method
– Isodata clustering

iirs
CHAIN METHOD
• Operates in two pass mode( it passes through the
registered multispectral dataset two times).
• In the first pass the program reads through the dataset
and sequentially builds clusters.
• A mean vector is associated with each cluster.
• In the second pass a minimum distance to means
classification algorithm is applied to whole dataset on a
pixel by pixel basis whereby each pixel is assigned to
one of the mean vectors created in pass 1.
• The first pass automatically creates the cluster
signatures to be used by supervised classifier.

iirs PASS 1: CLUSTER BUILDING
• During the first pass the analyst is required to

supply four types of information-
• R , the radius distance in spectral space used to
determine when a new cluster should be formed.
• C, a spectral space distance parameter used
when merging clusters when N is reached.
• N , the number of pixels to be evaluated between
each major merging of clusters.
• Cmax maximum no. of clusters to be identified.
PASS 2: Assignment of pixels to one of the Cmax

clusters using minimum distance classification logic

iirs
Original brightness values of pixels 1, 2, and

3 as measured in Bands 4 and 5 of the
hypothetical remote sensed data.

iirs
The distance (D) in 2-dimensional spectral space between pixel 1

(cluster 1) and pixel 2 (potential cluster 2) in the first iteration is
computed and tested against the value of R=15, the minimum
acceptable radius. In this case, D does not exceed R. Therefore, we
merge clusters 1 and 2 as shown in the next illustration.

iirs
Pixels 1 and 2 now represent cluster #1. Note that the location of cluster 1 has
migrated from 10,10 to 15,15 after the first iteration. Now, pixel 3 distance
(D=15.81) is computed to see if it is greater than the minimum threshold, R=15. It
is, so pixel location 3 becomes cluster #2. This process continues until all 20
clusters are identified. Then the 20 clusters are evaluated using a distance measure,
C (not shown), to merge the clusters that are closest to one another.

iirs
How clusters migrate during the several iterations of a clustering

algorithm. The final ending point represents the mean vector that
would be used in phase 2 of the clustering process when the
minimum distance classification is performed.

iirs
• Note: As more points are added to a cluster, the mean
shifts less dramatically since the new computed mean is
weighted by the number of pixels currently in a cluster.
The ending point is the spectral location of the final
mean vector that is used as a signature in the minimum
distance classifier applied in pass 2.
• Some clustering algorithms allow the analyst to

initially seed the mean vector for several of the
important classes. The seed data are usually obtained in
a supervised fashion, as discussed previously. Others
allow the analyst to use a priori information to direct the
clustering process.

iirs
Pass 2: Assignment of Pixels to One of the Cmax

Clusters Using Minimum Distance
Classification Logic
The final cluster mean data vectors are used in a
minimum distance to means classification
algorithm to classify all the pixels in the image
into one of the Cmax clusters.

iirs ISODATA Clustering
The Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis Technique (ISODATA)
represents a comprehensive set of heuristic (rule of thumb) procedures that
have been incorporated into an iterative classification algorithm.
The ISODATA algorithm is a modification of the k-means clustering

algorithm, which includes a) merging clusters if their separation distance in
multispectral feature space is below a user-specified threshold and b) rules
for splitting a single cluster into two clusters.
ISODATA is iterative because it makes a large number of passes

through the remote sensing dataset until specified results are
obtained, instead of just two passes.
ISODATA does not allocate its initial mean vectors based on the
analysis of pixels rather, an initial arbitrary assignment of all Cmax
clusters takes place along an n-dimensional vector that runs between
very specific points in feature space.
iirs
ISODATA algorithm normally requires the analyst
to specify-
Cmax : maximum no. of clusters to be identified.
T:maximum % of pixels whose class values are
allowed to be unchanged between iterations.
M :maximum no. of times isodata is to classify pixels
and recalculate cluster mean vectors.
Minimum members in a cluster
Maximum standard deviation for a cluster.
Split separation value (if the valuse is changed from 0.0, it takes
the place of S.D. )
Minimum distance between cluster means.

iirs Phase 1: ISODATA Cluster Building using many
passes through the dataset.
a) ISODATA initial distribution of five
hypothetical mean vectors using ±1s standard
deviations in both bands as beginning and
ending points.
b) In the first iteration, each candidate pixel is
compared to each cluster mean and assigned
to the cluster whose mean is closest in
Euclidean distance.
c) During the second iteration, a new mean is
calculated for each cluster based on the actual
spectral locations of the pixels assigned to
each cluster, instead of the initial arbitrary
calculation. This involves analysis of several
parameters to merge or split clusters. After
the new cluster mean vectors are selected,
every pixel in the scene is assigned to one of
the new clusters.
d) This split–merge–assign process continues
until there is little change in class assignment
between iterations (the T threshold is
reached) or the maximum number of
iterations is reached (M).

iirs
a) Distribution of 20 ISODATA
mean vectors after just one
iteration
b) Distribution of 20 ISODATA
mean vectors after 20 iterations.
The bulk of the important
feature space (the gray
background) is partitioned rather
well after just 20 iterations.

iirs
Sources of Uncertainty in Image
Classification
1.Non-representative training areas
2. High variability in the spectral

signatures for a land cover class
3. Mixed land cover within the pixel area

iirs
Evaluating
Classification
• After a classification is performed, these

methods are available for testing the accuracy of
the classification:
• Thresholding—Use a probability image file to

screen out misclassified pixels.
• Accuracy Assessment —Compare the
classification to ground truth or other data.

iirs
Accuracy Assessment
Accuracy assessment is a general term for

comparing the classification to geographical data
that are assumed to be true, in order to determine
the accuracy of the classification process. Usually,
the assumed-true data are derived from ground
truth data.

iirs Accuracy Assesement……
• Assessing accuracy of a remote sensing

output is one of the most important steps
in any classification exercise!!
• Without an accuracy assessment the
output or results is of little value.

iirs
There are a number of issues relevant to the generation

and assessment of errors in a classification.
These include:
• the nature of the classification;

• Sample design and
• assessment sample size.

iirs Nature of Classification:
– 1) Class definition problems occur when trying to extract information

from a image, such as tree height, which is unrealistic. If this
happens the error rate will increase.
– 2) A common problem is classifying remotely sensed data is to use

inappropriate class labels, such as cliff, lake or river all of which are
landforms and not cover-types. Similarly a common error is that of
using class labels which define land-uses. These features are
commonly made up of several cover classes.
– 3) The final point here, in terms of the potential for generation of error
is the mislabeling of classes. The most obvious example of this is to
label a training site water when in fact it is something else. This will
result in, at best a skewing of your class statistics if your training site
samples are sufficiently large, or at worst shifting the training
statistics entirely if your sites are relatively small.

iirs Sample Design:
• In addition to being independent of the original training sample the sample used
must be of a design that will insure consistency and objectivity.
• A number of sampling techniques can be used. Some of these include random,

systematic, and stratified random.
• Of the three the systematic sample is the least useful. This approach to
sampling may result in a sample distribution which favours a particular class
depending on the distribution of the classes within the map.
• Only random sample designs can guarantee an unbiased sample.
• The truly random strategy however may not yield a sample design that covers
the entire map area, and so may be less than ideal.
• In many instances the stratified random sampling strategy is the most useful
tool to use. In this case the map area is stratified based on either a
systematic breakdown followed by a random sample design in each of the
systematic subareas, or alternatively through the application of a random
sample within each of the map classes. The use of this approach will ensure
that one has an adequate cover for the entire map as well as generating a
sufficient number of samples for each of the classes on the map
iirs Sample Size:
• The size of the sample used must be sufficiently large to be

statistically representative of the map area. The number of
points considered necessary varies, depending on the
method used to estimate.
• What this means is that when using a systematic or random

sample size, the number of points are kept to a
manageable number. Because the number of points
contained within a stratified area is usually high, that is
greater than 10000, the number of samples used to test
the accuracy of the classes through a stratified random
sample will be high as well, so the cost for using a highly
accurate sampling strategy is a large number of samples

iirs
ERROR MATRIX
Once a classification has been sampled a
contingency table (also referred to as an
error matrix or confusion matrix) is
developed.
• This table is used to properly analyze the
validity of each class as well as the
classification as a whole.
• In this way the we can evaluate in more
detail the efficacy of the classification.

iirs One way to assess accuracy is to go out in the field and observe
the actual land class at a sample of locations, and compare to the
land classification it was assigned on the thematic map.
• There are a number of ways to quantitatively express the amount
of agreement between the ground truth classes and the remote
sensing classes.
• One way is to construct a confusion error matrix, alternatively
called a error matrix
• This is a row by column table, with as many rows as columns.
• Each row of the table is reserved for one of the information, or
remote sensing classes used by the classification algorithm.
• Each column displays the corresponding ground truth classes in
an identical order.

iirs OVERALL ACCURACY
• The diagonal elements tally the number of pixels classified
correctly in each class.
• But just because 83% classifications were accurate overall, does

not mean that each category was successfully classified at that
rate.

iirs USERS ACCURACY
• A user of the imagery who is particularly interested
in class A, say, might wish to know what proportion
of pixels assigned to class A were correctly
assigned.
• In this example 35 of the 39 pixels were correctly
assigned to class A, and the user accuracy in this
category of 35/39 = 90%

iirs
In general terms, for a particular category is user accuracy
computed as:
• which, for an error matrix set up with the row and column
assignments as stated, is computed as the user accuracy
• Evidently, a user accuracy can be computed for each row.

iirs PRODUCERS ACCURACY
• Contrasted to user accuracy is producer accuracy, which

has a slightly different interpretation.
• Producers accuracy is a measure of how much of the land in
each category was classified correctly.
• It is found, for each class or category, as
The Producer’s accuracy for class A is 35/50 = 70%

iirs
So from this assessment we have three measures
of accuracy which address subtly different issues:
– overall accuracy : takes no account of source of

error
(errors of omission or commission)
– user accuracy : measures the proportion of each

TM class which is correct.
– producer accuracy : measures the proportion of

the land base which is correctly classified.

iirs KAPPA COEFFICENT
• Another measure of map accuracy is the kappa coefficient, which is a measure
of the proportional (or percentage) improvement by the classifier over a
purely random assignment to classes.
For an error matrix with r rows, and hence the same number of columns, let
– A = the sum of r diagonal elements, which is the numerator in the
computation of overall accuracy
– Let B = sum of the r products (row total x column total).
• Then
• where N is the number of pixels in the error matrix

(the sum of all r individual cell values).

iirs
For the above error matrix,

– A = 35 + 37 + 41 = 113
– B = (39 * 50) + (50 * 40) + (47 * 46) = 6112
– N = 136
Thus
This can be tested statistically.

iirs

Digital Image Classification

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Digital Image Classification

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

iirs DIGITAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• Cost efficient in the analyses of large

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• Spectral Dimensionality is determined by

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• The measurement vector of a pixel is the

• Although image data files are stored band-

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Single-band Image Multi-band Image

• Image space (col,row)

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

No distinction between classes

Distinction between classes

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Two/three dimensional graph or scattered diagram

Each cluster of points corresponds to a certain cover type on

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

5 Validation of the result

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• Information classes are those that human beings

• Spectral classes are those that are inherent in

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• The identity and location of some of the land cover types

• The analyst attempts to locate specific sites in the

• Multivariate statistical parameters are calculated for

• Every pixel both inside and outside the training sites is

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• Supervised classification is usually appropriate when you

• On the other hand, if you want the classes to be determined

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• In supervised training, you rely on your own

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

class b • assign a class

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• Training samples (also called samples)

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

•using a vector layer

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

• There are tests to perform that can help

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Signature separability is a statistical measure of distance between

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

The scale of the divergence values can range from 0 to 2,000. As a

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Range of JM is between 0 and 1414. The JM distance has a saturating

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Digital Image Classification Poonam S.Tiwari

Means and Standard Deviations Partitioned Feature Space