Você está na página 1de 30

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Next generation biopharma manufacturing facilities


Trends for biotherapeutics and their production PABME, Dubai, April 29 2008
Dr. Gnter Jagschies, Senior Director R&D Strategic Customer Relations GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB Uppsala, Sweden

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Acknowledgments
Gail Sofer Lars Hagel Brian Kelley Karol cki Greg Blank Wolfgang Berthold Joachim K Walter Kjell Eriksson Hans J Johansson Eggert Brekkan

2 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Overview
Pressure on pipeline efficiency and cost of treatment Focus on manufacturing efficiency and costs Varying API categories and production sources Widely varying production scales Switch from dedicated to multiproduct facilities Flexibility, agility, cost efficiency

3 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Top selling biopharmaceuticals 2007


Branded product Product category EPOs Insulins Interferons Rituxan / MabThera Enbrel Remicade Herceptin Clotting factors Neulasta / Neupogen Avastin Lovenox Humira Growth hormones Prevnar / Prevenar Gardasil Erbitux Lucentis Synagis Cerezyme US $ M 11,101 10,926 8,223 5,527 5,275 4,948 4,862 4,518 4,277 4,114 3,605 3,000 2,762 2,439 1,481 1,439 1,386 >1,200 1,144 Growth Companies counted Amgen, Roche, J&J Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis Schering-Plough, Roche, Biogen Idec Bayer-Schering, Merck-Serono Genentech Amgen, Wyeth J&J, Schering-Plough Genentech Novo Nordisk, Wyeth, Bayer, Baxter Amgen Genentech Sanofi-Aventis Abbott Laboratories Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Serono Wyeth Merck&Co Merck-Serono, BMS Genentech, Novartis MedImmune Genzyme Mammalian cells Yes No Partly Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Partly Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Substance Erythropoietin rec hInsulin alpha/beta-Interferon Mab Fc fusion protein Mab Mab FVIII, F VII G-CSF Mab LMW Heparin Mab rec hGH Vaccine Vaccine Mab Mab fragment Mab Glucocerebrosidase

Biopharma blockbusters 2007: US $482,3 billion / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29 Mab blockbusters 2007: US $ 26,5 billion

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Need for efficiency improvement

5 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Cost of treatment, example


Typical current level
25.000

? ?

Market forces: - Public health care systems - Shorter time to next innovation - Biosimilars

20.000

Level of new or established alternative

15.000

10.000

Future level?

5.000

0 Today -10% -20% -30% -40% -75%

6 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

New(?) Challenges

Flexibility Agility Speed Efficiency

7 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Production Economics
Operating Costs in Mab Production
20% 20%
Depreciation Labour

I,T,M

D
Media other Raw Materials

13%

C
Protein A resin

L
3% 6% 6%

RM M
32%

other Consumables Insurances, T axes, Maintenance


Source: Genetic Engineering News, 2002

8 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

What is best-in-class performance?


Facility utilization Cost Process yield Product titer Time = = = = = 80-100% 15% CoS (100 USD/g) 70-80% 5 g/L 10 day upstream 2 days downstream <7 days change over

Best in class performance is foundation for the future


9 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Mabs, rProteins, Vaccines, Cells, Genes

2006

Pharmaceuticals Research & Manufacturing Association (PhRMA) clinical trials summary (2004-2006): Mabs: rProteins: 76 57 20% 160 94 > 50 approvals by

2004

@ success rate: 2012

10 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Mabs and mammalian cells dominate


(only products / API categories > US $ 1 billion included)

3.920

26.500

30.800
Mabs rProteins Vaccines

51.484
51.900
Mammalian cells Other cells

11 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Biopharma production challenges


(Production volume and revenue map, 2006 data)
Most rProteins will require annual capacity of 1-10 kg
100.000.000

10.000.000 Pharmacy price value [USD/g, 2006]

ReFacto Kogenate Avonex Advate

1.000.000

100.000

Aranesp Rebif PegaSys Neupogen NovoSeven Neulasta BeneFIX ReoPro Humatrope Humira Pulmozyme

Coagulation factor VIII EPO, Factor IX, VII, interferons l HGH, low dose antibodies n High dose antibodies, fusion proteins Insulins Some Mabs r Plasma proteins

10.000

Herceptin

1.000

100

Most future Mabs will require annual capacity of 100-500 kg

Enbrel Remicade Rituxan/MabThera Xolair Avastin Humalog Huminsulin

Synagis

will require annual capacity of 1-5 tons

10

Insulins 1-5 tons

IVIG, plasma

Plasma proteins 50-500 tons

HSA, plasma
1 0,01 0,10 1,00 10,00 100,00 1.000,00 10.000,00 100.000,00 1.000.000,00

Annual production volume [kg]


Pharmacy list prices 2006, available packages: Arzneimittelkompendium (CH), MediMedia Gelbe Liste Pharmaindex (GER), RxUSA.com Pharmacy (USA) Annual global sales 2006: Annual reports 2006 Plasma products: Marketing Research Bureau 2004

12 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

The challenge is the supply of vaccines


Capacity
2500 2000 million doses 1500 1000 500 0

Time

2004

2006

2010

WHO

Pandemic Planning

There is a huge gap between the expected demand and the current capacity Most countries are looking for in-country domestic solutions WHO is driving local capacity build up

Currently the manufacturing time is ~6-9 months Need of faster supply less than 3 months production time Difficult and time consuming to scale up with old technology
13 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

The vaccine landscape is changing and is moving to new manufacturing methods


Egg-based production technology Cell Culture-based production technology Cell Free production technology

System

Eggs

Mammalian Cells ~6 months New on the market

Insect and Bacterial Cells Recomb Cells ~3 months In 2-4 years time Days? -

Lead Times 6-9 months Maturity On the market

14 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Many facilities have


Large / modern biopharma facilities

brand new installations and up to 25 year old installations, running with new and old processes.
Genentech, Oceanside, CA

dedicated one-product or multiproduct setups. a degree of mismatch between current bioreactor output and DSP line dimensions chosen at the time of facility design.

Image: Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH

limited flexibility!
15 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Production setup: 6 fermentors 1 DSP


1-ton/yr scenario
10 kg/batch 126 batches 80% yield

Mab Cell Culture


(6x 2.000 L, 5 g/L)

10-ton/yr scenario
75 kg/batch 168 batches 80% yield - 313 L bed volume - 40 g/L capacity - one cycle

Mab Cell Culture


(6x 15.000 L, 5 g/L)

Cell Removal

Cell Removal

Capture
(1x 120 cm , 30 cm height)

Capture
(1x 160 cm , 40 cm height)

- 780 L bed volume - 40 g/L capacity - three cycles

Virus Inactivation

Virus Inactivation
- 125 L bed volume - 100 g/L capacity - one cycle

Polishing 1
(1x 80 cm , 25 cm height)

Polishing 1
(1x 160 cm , 42 cm height)

- 850 L bed volume - 100 g/L capacity - one cycle

Virus Removal

Virus Removal
- 62 L bed volume - 200 g/L capacity - one cycle

Polishing 2
(1x 60 cm , 23 cm height)

Polishing 2
(1x 140 cm , 30 cm height)

- 425 L bed volume - 200 g/L capacity - one cycle

UF/DF Formulation

UF/DF Formulation
16 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Scale up issues
Quick educational excurse: What happens if technology progress is not anticipated or underestimated?

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Cell culture

18 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Chromatography

CD= =180cm 80cm CD 120cm 140cm 160cm 100cm


19 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Emerging production scenarios


More companies will have more than one product in production, many of them small in scale Bioreactor volume
Stainless steel space Lab bench designs used to be a production transfer issue. Now the issue is with stainless steel engineering habits! High product titers fewer batches produce large quantities
Large number of batches cGMP fully dedicated facility favors re-use strategies (500-3.000 kg per product)
(scale: 5 25 000 L)

cGMP multi-product facility (10-500 kg per product) facility cGMP multi-product (10-500 kg per product) cGMP multi-product facility
(10-500 kg per product)

High product titers smaller installations produce large quantities

10000

1000

cGMP clinical manufacturing


Scale limit for many single-use (2-30 kg per product) components: 1000 L

100

How much of GMP production will reach the disposable space? Production scenarios need to consider higher degrees of flexibility

Non-GMP pilot facility


10
(10-500 g per product)

Disposables space
10 100

Batches / product / year


(scale: 1-170 with six-pack of bioreactors) 20 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Reality check
How many products are sharing facility capacity? Products above one metric ton per year may still require one or more dedicated facilities Multiple product facilities will be dominating the future Flexibility in the design is best protection against uncertainty in planning

Genentech manufacturing backgrounder (www.gene.com, 2006)

21 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

A paradigm shift is coming up

Homemade, custom engineering with lack of global standards and no holistic view on economic efficiency (re-inventing of wheels!) Fixed systems with complex piping and automation requirements (likely site specific) Laborious design, commissioning and qualification DQ, IQ, OQ, PQ, etc., (very formal, not very smart) Change-over between campaign too laborious and time consuming (the iron age)

The change

"Got aa few problems going from lab "Got few problems with getting scale to full-scale commercial." enough value out of this facility."

22 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Ten Commandments
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Use technology platforms Optimize facility utilization Create flexibility in manufacturing Use LEAN tools Address process yield Eliminate batch failures Use advanced selectivities Use most recent technology Minimize buffer related costs Bundle incremental improvements
23 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

LEAN chromatography - summary


Classic step (1st generation tools)
Excessive elution volume &) Excessive equilibration volume &) Excessive process time &)
&)

not optimized

Resin preparation*)

Packing and re-packing*) Run TM ReadyToProcess


Equilibration Load

Inefficient wash step &)

AxiChromTM Faster procedure Less failure


Resin Preparation*)

Wash

Elution

Strip

CIP and storage #)

pre-packed pre-qualified pre-sanitized


Packing and re-packing*) Run
Equilibration Load Wash Elution Strip

Modern resins
Optional: Waste removed Single-use operation

Higher capacity and flow, longer lifetime


CIP and storage #)

Inefficient wash step &) Excessive equilibration volume &)


&)

elution PreDictorTM Excessive plates volume (HTPD) not yet optimized


&)

Value adding work Non-value adding work Required non-value adding work

Fast, tools) Improved step (use of up-to-date low cost optimization (LEAN & SixSigma)

24 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Influenza vaccine production capacity build up with disposables to save time


Traditional Flu Vaccine Production Facility Commissioning & Validation:
Build Facility Commission Facility Validate Equipment Validate Process

Disposable Insect Cell Culture-Based Flu Vaccine Production:


Build Facility Commission Facility Validate Equipment Validate Process Time Saved
25 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Saving ~60% in time

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Our vision . . .the future is a modular, selfsupporting, disposable production plant


flexibel planning flexible location minimal capital investment minimal process development minimal distribution and storage local policies/relationships local human capital

Fast deployable production capacity


26 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Process economy gains overall DSP


Use of modern resins: combined effect of capacity, flow, and lifetime
Cost savings with modern resins up to 70% Process time down to 2 days from 5 days 2-step process: additional indirect gains from space and tankage requirements
37,4

40
Downstream cost contribution [USD/g]

120

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

100

Working volume 10,000 L Titer 5 g/L Yield 79%


19,2

80

60

40 11,8 10,9 20

Classic process
(Sepharose Fast Flow resins)

Protein A update
(MabSelect SuRe / Sepharose Fast Flow)

Protein A 3-step model process


(MabSelect SuRe / Capto S/ Capto Q)

Protein A 2-step model process


(MabSelect SuRe / Capto adhere)
27 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

DSP process time [h]

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Process improvements
Can be nothing Can be millions

Low
Low facility utilization Staff is available and has spare time Existing equipment, performance tolerance Hesitant to invest in improvement

Facility utilization

Intense
Intense facility utilization Staff is a scarce resource, tough prioritization Equipment performance on critical path Investment in improvement pays off quickly

Efficiency gains hardly visible at management level

Efficiency gains directly visible at management level

Cost driven management Extra production time creates the opportunity to run more batches. In a facility that produces several Mab products at a cost of $ 100M 70% of the costs may be considered fixed. At 5 days batch time up to 70 batches of 25 kg each could be run. One additional batch would reduce the cost per batch with $ ~15K. The savings amount to $ 1M / yr. Revenue driven management At a commercial value of $ 2.000/gram, one extra batch of 25 kg of product would be worth $ 50M of extra revenue.
28 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Conclusions
Monoclonal antibodies Improved processes with modern production tools and LEAN design are requirements to remain competitive and meet treatment cost challenges Insulin Diabetes is a growing challenge all over Asia. Local production will be a need and a business opportunity Plasma proteins Advanced healthcare is a growing need all over Asia. Again, local collection of human plasma and fractionation is a business opportunity Vaccines Vaccination carries the hope for cure instead of chronic treatment. Infectious disease is a global threat (e.g., pandemic influenza). Short lead times of just a few months require fast deployment of production where the outbreak is.

29 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Click Here & Upgrade

PDF Complete

Documents

Expanded Features Unlimited Pages

Thank you
GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, a General Electric company. GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB Bjrkgatan 30 751 84 Uppsala Sweden Capto, MabSelect, and Sepharose are trademarks of GE Healthcare companies. Biacore is a trademark of Biacore AB. GE, imagination at work and GE monogram are trademarks of General Electric Company. All goods and services are sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale of the company within GE Healthcare which supplies them. GE Healthcare reserves the right, subject to any regulatory and contractual approval, if required, to make changes in specifications and features shown herein, or discontinue the product described at any time without notice or obligation. Contact your local GE Healthcare representative for the most current information. 2007 General Electric Company All rights reserved.

30 / GE-Jagschies R&D / 2008-04-29

Você também pode gostar