Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
178]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
CASE REPOrT
Key words
Mesiodens, mesiodentes, occlusal, radiograph, vertex
An 8-year-old boy reported with the complaint of a large gap between his upper front teeth. His dental status was coincident with his chronological age. There was no relevant medical or family history and the patient was otherwise healthy. An anterior maxillary occlusal radiograph revealed the presence of mesiodentes (two in number; [Figure 1]). However, the mesiodentes were unerupted. A vertex occlusal radiograph was also taken to help in localizing the mesiodentes with respect to the maxillary central incisors [Figure 2]. A written consent was obtained from the boys parents for the same. The data for obtaining the vertex occlusal radiograph were as follows: Machine SIEMENS BD-CX (Germany) radiography unit. Film Kodak Ultra-speed occlusal.
JOURNAL OF INDiAN SOCiETY OF PEDODONTiCs AND PREVENTiVE DENTisTRY | Jul - Sept 2011 | Issue 3 | Vol 29 |
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.jisppd.comonThursday,December05,2013,IP:36.73.98.178]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Collimator light beam. Focus skin distance 70 cm. Tube current 200 mA. Tube voltage 90 KVp. Exposure time 0.5 seconds. Filter 2.8 mm aluminum. Milliampere second 100 mAs.
Results
The anterior maxillary occlusal radiograph could reveal only the presence of mesiodentes (two in number). However, the vertex occlusal radiograph provided a greater understanding of the situation which could not be interpreted from the former. Those were as follows [Figure 2]: The mesiodentes were located palatal to the central incisors, out of which, one was located palatal to 21, more toward the midline, while the other was palatal to 11. Each mesiodens had similar vertical inclination with the central incisor they were related to. This could be interpreted because they appeared as cross-sectioned images just like the central incisors. The proximity of each of the mesiodentes to the central incisors could be assessed. The proximity of one mesiodens to the other could be assessed.
Discussion
Figure 2: Vertex occlusal radiograph showing two mesiodentes
The maxillary occlusal projections used in dentistry are as follows: Anterior maxillary occlusal projection (vertical angulation of +65; [Figure 3a]). Cross-sectional maxillary occlusal projection (vertical angulation of +80; [Figure 3b]). True maxillary occlusal projection (vertical angulation of +90; [Figure 3c]). Vertex occlusal projection [Figure 3d]. To obtain a vertex occlusal radiograph, the central ray needs to pass through the vertex of the skull and exit through the long axis of the maxillary central incisors. In doing so, the ray makes an anterior angle of 110 to the horizontal, as the maxillary central incisors are normally proclined at approximately 20 to the vertical [Figure 4].The image thus obtained makes the central incisors appear in cross-sections like buttons with holes, where the holes represent pulp cavities of these teeth [Figure 2]. Therefore, any object near the central incisors
Figure 3: (a) Anterior maxillary occlusal projection, (b) Cross-sectional maxillary occlusal projection, (c) True maxillary occlusal projection, (d) Vertex occlusal projection 261
JOURNAL OF INDiAN SOCiETY OF PEDODONTiCs AND PREVENTiVE DENTisTRY | Jul - Sept 2011 | Issue 3 | Vol 29 |
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.jisppd.comonThursday,December05,2013,IP:36.73.98.178]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
The greatest advantage with the vertex occlusal radiograph is that the image of the central incisors does not superimpose on those of the mesiodentes. This makes positional interpretation of the mesiodentes with respect to the long axis of the central incisors simple and obvious. The vertex occlusal view is the clearest for horizontal and anteroposterior localization and is therefore preferred to assist in determining optimal surgical approach.[7] It has also been chosen as the gold standard for canine position because it was considered to provide clear, unequivocal information about the relationship of the unerupted tooth with the dental arch.[8]
Figure 4: Angulation of the vertex occlusal projection
A possible contraindication to the use of the vertex occlusal projection could be malaligned central incisors, where it might be difficult to project the rays parallel to the long axes of these teeth [Figures 5 and 6]. However, the angulation may be varied to obtain the desired result. The maximum radiation dose to obtain a vertex occlusal radiograph is 1.301 cGy.[9] The total energy imparted for each vertex occlusal view is 0.7 mJ (with an intensifying screen) compared to 0.4 mJ for an anterior maxillary occlusal view.[10] There also lies the disadvantage of having the rays pass through brain and eye tissues. The parallax method incorporating two periapical radiographs or a combination of occlusal and panoramic radiographs may also be used to localize a mesiodens.[7]
Conclusions
Figure 5: Maxillary cast showing a malaligned central incisor
Vertex occlusal radiography is undoubtedly an important diagnostic tool in diagnosing the presence, position, and proximity of mesiodentes with respect to the long axis of normally aligned maxillary central incisors. However, it is not recommended for routine use in a patient as its radiation dose is higher than conventional intraoral radiographic methods.
References
1. Ray D, Bhattacharya B, Sarkar S, Das G. Erupted maxillary conical mesiodens in deciduous dentition in a Bengali girl A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2005;23:153-5. 2. Zhu JF, Mauricio M, King DL, Henry RJ. Supernumerary and congenitally absent teeth: A literature review. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996;20:87-95. 3. Sharma A, Gupta S, Madam M. Uncommon mesiodens a report of two cases. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1999;17:69-71. 4. Gallas MM, Garcia A. Retention of permanent incisors by mesiodens: A family affair. Br Dent J 2000;188:63-4. 5. Prabhu NT, Rebecca J, Munshi AK. Mesiodens in the primary dentition A case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 1998;16:93-5.
Figure 6: Vertex occlusal radiograph of a patient with malaligned central incisors having mesiodens
will appear in the image with respect to the long axis of the central incisors.
262
JOURNAL OF INDiAN SOCiETY OF PEDODONTiCs AND PREVENTiVE DENTisTRY | Jul - Sept 2011 | Issue 3 | Vol 29 |
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.jisppd.comonThursday,December05,2013,IP:36.73.98.178]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
6. Castillo Kaler L. The incidence of mesiodens in children of Hispanic descent. J Pedod 1986;10:164-8. 7. Cameron AC, Widmer RP. Dental anomalies. In: Cameron AC, Widmer RP, editors. Handbook of Pediatric Dentistry. 2nd ed. Mosby; 2003. p.193. 8. Fox NA, Fletcher GA, Horner K. Localising maxillary canines using dental panoramic tomography. Br Dent J 1995;179: 416-20. 9. Roth SF, Bohay RN, Barnett RB. Surface and internal absorbed doses in mandibular and maxillary occlusal radiography. J Can
Dent Assoc 1995;61:955-9. 10. Wall BF, Fisher ES, Paynter R, Hudson A, Bird PD. Doses to patients from phanto-. mographic and convention dental radiography. Br J Radiol 1979;52:727-34.
How to cite this article: Akkara F, Ataide IN, Chalakkal P, Thomas AM. Vertex occlusal radiography in localizing unerupted mesiodentes. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:260-3. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Announcement
iPhone App
A free application to browse and search the journals content is now available for iPhone/iPad. The application provides Table of Contents of the latest issues, which are stored on the device for future offline browsing. Internet connection is required to access the back issues and search facility. The application is Compatible with iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad and Requires iOS 3.1 or later. The application can be downloaded from http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/medknow-journals/ id458064375?ls=1&mt=8. For suggestions and comments do write back to us.
JOURNAL OF INDiAN SOCiETY OF PEDODONTiCs AND PREVENTiVE DENTisTRY | Jul - Sept 2011 | Issue 3 | Vol 29 |
263