Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Tanguy ROUXEL
LARMAUR, ERL CNRS 6274, University Rennes 1, France
Elastic moduli, Poissons ratio and the short to medium range order in glass High temperature elastic behavior and the depolymerization of the atomic network The viscous flow process and the non-Arrhenian behavior
RISC-E octobre 2011
Elastic moduli, Poissons ratio and the short to medium range order in glass
There is no direct correlation between E and Tg Elastic moduli are expressed in Pascals, i.e. in J/m3 , and are thus governed by the volume density of energy
m he
ic
P a l-
hy
s s ic
of s c i s) an s w h a l l c M e t e r i a titiv e M a n s ti (c o
in . g n l E s ig n a ic an al D e h c r M e u c tu r St
Silicate glasses: Glass formers (Si, Al, B, Zr) Modifyers and charge compensators (Li, Na, K, Ca, Ba) Anions: O, N or C
Cation substitution: modifyers ! Uo ; formers ! Cg Intermediate elements occupying former or interstitial sites: Hf, Be, Zr, Ti, Li and Th. Electronegativities: 1.25 to 1.75. Emax=145 GPa: magnesium aluminates + 25 mol.% de BeO.
Si O O O Si
Si Si O N O Si Si
Si Si C
Si
O Si Si
Si
E oxycarbides and E oxynitrides >> E oxides However: UoSiC(447) kJ/mol)~UoSi-N(437 kJ/mol)<UoSi-O(800 kJ/mol)
This is more the architecture (reticulation) of the network than the individual bond stiffnes that governs the glass elasticity
General tendencies:
!cd<!bcc<!fcc,hcp
For a given crystalline structure and valency, Poissons ratio mostly increases with atomic number (Z) (Lead (!Pb=0.44) and thallium (!Tl=0.45) with high Z have remarkably high Poissons ratios) High melting points favor low Poisson's ratio (beryllium, combining a small Z and a melting point (Tm=1560 K) much higher than those of the other elements in the same column, exhibits a remarkably small Poissons ratio of 0.032)
Molecular scale:
0D: Clusters, litlle short to medium range ordering
Se
Se
Se
Se
Se
Se
Se
Se
Se
Se Ge
2D: Layers
Se Se Se Ge O
Se Se
Se Se
Se Ge Se Se
Se
Ge
Se
Si O
O O Si Si O
Si
Si O
Si
Si O
O O
O O
O
C
O O O
O O
a-SiO2
GeSe4
#& 0.15 3D
D L
#& 0.286 2D %
"L "D
#& 0.323 1D
High temperature elastic behavior and the depolymerization of the atomic network
Transmitter/recei ver
Piezoelectric transducer (5 to 20 MHz) L Sample Elastic wave in semi-infinite medium : (<<L and ( << )
Long beam bar mode : e<<L and e << ( (10 to 100 mm)
E = ' Vl2
E = ' (3Vl2-4Vt2)/((Vl/Vt)2 -1) G= ' Vt2 #=E/(2G)-1 Where: ': specific mass Vl: longitudinal wave velocity Vt: transverse wave velocity
VR =
160
140
120
Oxynitride
60
Tg
40
SiOC Se Ge15Se85 Ge30Se70 YSiAlON(7.5 at% N) YSiAlON(Si/Al=1.5) YSiAlON(Si/Al=3.75) ZrCuAlNi Ge22As20Se58 Pd42.5Ni71Cu30P20 Diopside a-B2O3
Window glas s Ge10Se90 Ge25Se75 YSiAlO YSiAlON(11.2 at% N) YSiAlON(Si/Al=1.95) YMgSiAlON Glycerol a-SiO2 ZBLAN Gros sular
0 200
1000
1200
1400
1600
T (K)
For T>Tg, /(Tg)=(Tg/T)+ where + ranges between 0.07 (a-SiO2) and 10 (a-Se)
Log stress
- = -o exp["Ga /(RT)]
-: the characteristic relaxation time -o: a constant T: temperature R: perfect gas constant "Ga: free activation enthalpy of the flow process Assuming a simple Maxwell relaxation model ,= -o exp["Ga /(RT)] , where is the shear elastic modulus.
Log ,/,(Tg)
Strong
, = ,o exp["Ga /(RT)]
Fragile
Tg/T
Observations: the heat for flow is temperature dependent, especially in the case of short glasses VFT, WLF, AM, MYEGA numerous empirical expressions
- = -o exp[z"g /(RT)]
-: the characteristic relaxation time; -o: a constant; T: temperature; R: perfect gas constant; z: number of molecules or monomeric segments; "g: height of the potential energy hindering the cooperative rearrangement of the elementary structural units involved in the process Assuming a simple Maxwell relaxation model ,= -o exp[z"g /(RT)] , where is the shear elastic modulus. z is inversely proportional to the configurational entropy Sc and "g is taken as temperature independent
, = ,o exp["G /TSc]
The configurational entropy is a temperature dependent parameter (especially for T>Tg) which is commonly assimilated to the excess entropy
Liq Glass Cp " Cp Sc (T ) = Sc (Tg ) + # dT Tg T T
Good fit of experimental data in the few cases where actual calorimetric data are available (Richet, Botinga)
But fundamentals uncertainties remain ( excess versus configurational entropy; Configurational versus vibrational entropy )
Present analysis:
,= -o exp["Ga /(RT)]
i) As in the case of plasticity in crystalline materials, the energy barrier for viscous flow chiefly depends on the shear elastic modulus. Therefore comes into play both in the prefactor and implicitly in "Ga Glassy materials differ from crystalline ones by a rapid softening in the supercooled liqui range (i.e. for T>Tg), so that is mostly very sensitive to temperature. Consequently, "Ga depends much on temperature and this can be analyzed within the classical framework of thermodynamics, recalling that the entropy change writes
ii)
"S = #
$"G $T
%
The problem of concern reduces to the determination of the temperature dependence of !Ga, !Sa and the heat for flow !Ha !
(4)
" = # / $
!
(2)+(5)
"Sa = #
$ , stru
"Sa = #
!
"S a
!"S#
T # " = #T
"H a = R
+(6)
"Sa
# ln $ 1 # T % , stru $ = # "H a (1 # $ )T
For -=10 MPa and Va=50 -Va=500 -1 ! J.mol , to be compared ! with the order of ! activation energies, 100 to 1000 kJ.mol-1
cm3.mol-1,
"Ga =
1 "H a (1 # $ )
"H a
# ln $ = R # (1/ T ) % , stru
"#$%&,"#$%&...
This is where entropy comes into play
/(Tg)=(Tg/T)+
!
"Ga = "Ga(Tg)(Tg/T)+
with
,o = (T),(Tg)/(Tg)
!
with: (T)=.exp(E/T)
Equivalent to MYEGA equation