Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
STRATEGIC PLAN FOR A STATEWIDE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) SUPPORTIVE SERVICE LOCATOR AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Submitted to:
Submitted by: Michael Wallace, GISP Director of Information Technology The Wallace Corporation 7743 S. Racine Ave. Chicago, IL 60620 (630) 247-0823 (mobile) michael@wallacecorporation.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background and Objectives ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Context for Strategic Planning ................................................................................. 1 1.3 Overview of Current SSL Situation and Needs ............................................................................. 2 1.4 Concept of Cloud Based, SSL ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Strategic Foundation .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Vision and Strategy ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Organizational Context for SSL .......................................................................................................... 7 2.3 SSL Program Mission and Goals ........................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Challenges ................................................................... 9 3. Technical and Organizational Design for SSL ..........................................................................12 3.1 IT and GIS Technical Requirements and Trends ...................................................................... 12 3.2 GIS Design 13 3.3 Organizational Requirements and Challenges .......................................................................... 21 3.4 GIS Organizational and Management Structure ....................................................................... 21 4. Major Strategic Initiatives ..............................................................................................................26 4.1 Elaboration of High-Level Goals ..................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Implementation Stages ...................................................................................................................... 27 4.3 Cost Projections .........................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 5. Business Case for SSL .......................................................................................................................32 5.1 SSL Business Case Premise ............................................................................................................... 32 5.2 SSL Business Drivers ........................................................................................................................... 33 5.3 SSL Benefits 33 6. Conclusions..........................................................................................................................................39
ii
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background and Objectives
The Wallace Corporation has initiated a Statewide Supportive Service Locator (SSL) project based on Geographic Information Systems technology which includes a strategic plan and implementation plan. This project is designed to provide supportive service locating operations in a very user-friendly environment. The system will define a path for an effective and efficient method of joining clients with supportive services through a Web-based GIS locator. This application will benefit all individuals and their families seeking services and the organizations providing the assistance. A Geographic Information System (GIS) is defined as an information system that is used to input, store, retrieve, manipulate, analyze and output geographically referenced data (location-based), in order to support decision making for planning and management of land use, natural resources, environment, transportation, urban facilities, and other administrative details. The purpose of the GIS SSL Strategic Plan is to assert a holistic approach towards the use of GIS technology for the SSL and to establish a unified vision for the organization to further invest in Cloud Based GIS technology in an effective, efficient, and coordinated manner. This project is being led by the Department of Information Technology and the Geospatial Manager of The Wallace Corporation. The project objectives are to conduct and prepare: Inventory of current GIS status and technology resources (establishes baseline for project) SSL business requirements and needs (basis for technical and organizational design) Technical and organizational design for the SSL System (foundation for planning) Strategic Plan and Business Case (defines long-term vision, goals, justification for investment, and basis for implementation planning) Implementation plan (detailed roadmap, costs, and management practices for long-term and short-term GIS SSL development and operation) This report is the main project deliverable for Phase 2, the Supportive Service Locator (SSL) and Management System Strategic Plan. This Strategic Plan is intended to define a long-term picture of and strategy for the future Statewide GIS Supportive Service Locator System and provide a foundation for the more detailed implementation planning to be carried out in Phase 3 of this project. This Strategic Plan also includes several other critical parts that add to the long-term strategic foundation: a) a technical and organizational design for Statewide GIS SSL System and b) a business case justifying development and investment of funding for the SSL System.
p. 1
This Strategic Plan includes the major sections summarized below: Section 1, Introduction, presents information about the background of this planning project, an overview of the SSL System and needs, explains strategic planning concepts, context for this plan, and summarizes this plan's content. Section 2, Strategic Foundation, presents the core contents of the strategic plan including a vision, mission, and high-level goals which together establish a future target and path for the Statewide GIS SSL System development and deployment. Section 3, Technical and Organizational Design for the SSL System, explains requirements and presents recommendations for the SSL technological and organizational components. The technical architecture paints a high-level picture of the system configuration, data, organizational structure, and management elements that work together for a successful SSL System. Section 4, Major Strategic Initiatives, elaborates on the high-level goals, explains major initiatives that address SSL System needs, presents multi-year timing and phasing, and cost projections. Section 5, Business Case for a SSL System, describes GIS-related business drivers, potential benefits, and a justification for moving ahead with the SSL System development
Deliverables Return on Investment Financing Strategy Contract Support Project Staffing Staffing Recommendations Risks Limitations
Governments depend on data to provide services to the community. Interestingly, a large majority of this data is location-based. Computer systems that can manage location-based information provide a unique geographic and competitive advantage. There is wide understanding and acceptance within The Wallace Corporation that a Geographic Information System (GIS) -a proven information technology, is essential to delivering a broad spectrum of services involving location-based information. This document represents a road map in the form a five year Strategic Plan for the SSL.
p. 2
The Wallace Corporation in partnership with Veterans Housing & Employment Assistance (VHEA), NFP assessed the need for a SSL System, including methods of current management, use and needs. This Phase 1 work involved extensive information gathering from many service providers, including government agencies, community based organizations, and other selected supportive service contributors. Some essential results from this assessment are summarized below: Direct use of resources to individuals can be impeded by lack of relevant information available. The current service data is highly disjointed; there is a need for a centralized data warehouse. The process of service providers depends on stagnate, geographic information data but there remains a significant gap between current use and potential of a SSL to address these inefficiencies. The assessment identified more than 20 potential categories that could support service providers needs and be used to derive major benefits for all users. There are important obstacles and limitations preventing full use and realization of potential benefits from a SSL. Among these problems: data content quality, currency and availability, severe limitations in access to location based solutions, barriers to multi-institutional coordination and information sharing, and poor awareness of SSL opportunities by senior management. These obstacles are not a reflection of staff performance or inappropriate use of existing tools. Rather, they are the result of issues of resource allocation and organizational structure which can be effectively addressed through the recommendations in this plan. This Strategic Plan will address all these areas in a 5-year, incremental approach for a SSL program deployment and provide a strong business case for moving ahead.
p. 3
1.4 Concept of Cloud Based, Statewide GIS Supportive Service Locator System
This Strategic Plan calls for the development of a SSL System that follows concepts of "Cloud Based GIS" the following key themes establish the foundation: In cloud computing, the word cloud (also phrased as "the cloud") is used as a metaphor for "the Internet," so the phrase cloud computing means "a type of Internet-based computing," where different services -- such as servers, storage and applications -- are delivered to an organization's computers and devices through the Internet. A geographic information system (GIS) integrates hardware, software, and data for capturing, managing, analyzing, and displaying all forms of geographically referenced information. GIS allows us to view, understand, question, interpret, and visualize data in many ways that reveal relationships, patterns, and trends in the form of maps, globes, reports, and charts. A GIS helps you answer questions and solve problems by looking at your data in a way that is quickly understood and easily shared. GIS technology can be integrated into any enterprise information system framework. Cloud-based GIS services focuses on individual needs and cross-organizational sharing of resources through an interactive web-based mapping platform GIS Locator and Management System is one part of VHEAs overall information technology architecture with adherence to applicable IT policies and standards for all parties Integration between the SSL and other, non-GIS, systems and databases GIS data and resources viewed as valuable assets are properly maintained so their value and quality is sustained and enhanced Collaboration among all GIS or SSL users and effective partnerships with external public sector agencies, non-profit organizations, and the private sector Improved location-based services to citizens, organizations, and all visitors of the webbased portal Improvements in the infrastructure of all agencies, to enhance access to information and location-based analytics to better serve the community. Sound management, policies, and standards that ensure a valuable, efficient Statewide GIS SSL System
The SSL System will be effectively managed providing access to GIS data, services, and products for all pertinent agencies, organizations, and institutions. An accessible SSL System will build on current collaboration with external organizations to share data and resources, provide enhanced services in a high quality and cost-effective manner. There is also a focus on providing better access to information for the community based organizations, service providers and the general public.
p. 4
2. STRATEGIC FOUNDATION
This section presents four main components of the strategic plan which establish the necessary context for the SSL System implementation: The Wallace Corporations vision, mission, and strategy Organizational context defining potential roles for SSL personnel and collaboration with external organizations Mission and high-level goals which characterize the desired future for an expanded Statewide GIS SSL Identification of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges (SWOC) that identify advantages and conditions that should be taken into account in the SSL implementation
p. 5
Goal 4: Supportive Services Provide access to supportive services to ensure the safety and health of the community through quality assistance to individuals. Goal 5: Multi Institutional Collaboration Deliver quality services to meet community needs in partnership with an array of committed agencies and organizations assuring that the SSL System is sufficiently applied by trained staff and well equipped overall. Goal 6: Quality of Life Provide quality of life services to meet community needs, assuring that there are strong relationships with all sectors of the community and ample opportunities for citizen engagement.
The SSL System is a tool that can directly support each of these goals by providing tools to efficiently manage geographically distributed information, provide services to its citizens and organizations distributed throughout its area attract new clients to already existing service providers, and to ensure a high quality of life. Table 1 provides a general picture of the relationship of the strategic goals with GIS SSL System. Table 1: Relationship of GIS SSL with Wallace Co. Strategic Goals
SSL Strategic Goal Goal 1: Infrastructure GIS Relationship and Support
Infrastructure management is a key focus of the SSL. Identified applications call for the use of GIS data and technology to support the effective planning, design, development, and ongoing operation of the portal. GIS provides information and technology tools needed to support web infrastructure planning and design, and efficient maintenance that will provide for long-term operation and delivery of an efficient cloud based supportive service locator system. In its substantial use in many disciplines, GIS technology has been a valuable tool that supports local, state, and federal government, private sector, and many other organizations and institutions. The SSL System can provide personnel with easily accessible tools to answer questions from prospective clients about opportunities and locations to access supportive services. In addition, the SSL may be used to provide Web-based access to maps and information to help visitors to the specific service provider selected. GIS is also a powerful tool that can be used to streamline the review processes of service providers by means of accountability reporting. Finally, GIS has proven its value to support wise, effective long-range decisions that will assist to sustain a high quality of life for all clients that interact with the SSL System. As described in the business case portion of this strategic plan (see Section 5), a SSL will deliver a range of tangible and intangible benefits that contributes to the systems fiscal health. Among these benefits are major staff efficiency gains for existing service providers, opportunities for avoiding future staff and operational costs, revenue enhancements, cost savings for funded service providers, and cost sharing through partnerships with external organizations. Service providers will benefit from the use of geographic information and analysis to connect clients with organizations. GIS excels in its support both for emergency and public outreach as well as the strategic side of communication and response. A properly implemented SSL System throughout the State will improve each organizations ability to respond to emergency situations and meet public support challenges. The SSL can directly respond to organizations goals for improved client/citizen service and responsiveness to requests for information and supportive services. The primary focus is on delivering better information, in a geographically oriented manner to clients that will allow them to assess current status and make informed location-based decisions and responses on actions. For the Service Provider community, this also includes streamlined procedures for review and decisions on areas with the greatest need. Also, the web-based GIS SSL System can be combined with general online tools to provide the public and service provider community with easy to access information, reports and services. Sustaining and improving quality of life for the SSL clients is at the heart of this project. In addition to providing access to supportive services in a user friendly way, the SSL System can be used to guide planning and operation of local amenities that contribute to quality of life including treatment and outreach
Goal 2: Development
p. 6
initiatives, community development projects, and special events. In addition, Web-based GIS applications with public access can enhance tools for individuals and organizations to learn of and participate in many types of social impact programs.
External Organizations: Federal, State, Local GIS Departments, Community-Based Organizations and Service Providers
The Wallace Co. mission is to manage the GIS system, data and provide mapping and GIS services for all GIS SSL System partners. The GIS (ESRI ArcGIS software) supports a database that includes parcels, governmental and administrative district boundaries, transportation centerlines, address information, and other data layers. The Wallace Co., various government agencies, and other organizations have shared GIS data for several years including road centerline data, address, and land use data etc.
p. 7
p. 8
p. 9
Table 3: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges Impacting Statewide GIS SSL Development
Positive Factors
Strengths:
Existing GIS management and data provides the basic foundation for GIS SSL System coordination Existing knowledgeable GIS technical staff and users GIS SSL technical architecture uses ESRI software stable firm and leader in the GIS industry GIS database and maintenance procedures provides for large part of GIS user needs Advances in GIS software providing more effective Web-based applications for geographic data viewing, analysis, and integration Data sharing with external organizations supports cost-effective access to high-priority data (e.g., orthoimagery) Established regional and national community of local government GIS supports business case and provides models for a Nationwide GIS SSL System
Negative Factors
Weaknesses:
Limited current use of GIS and lack of understanding and awareness of potential GIS applications and benefits (by external organizations and staff) Current GIS configuration (personal geodatabases, desktop licenses) limits access and expansion opportunity for external organizations Insufficient collaboration and information sharing presents barriers for multi-institutional GIS applications There is a need for significant improvements in accurate database content and quality to fully respond to application and benefit opportunities Current budget limitations impact availability of funds for SSL Current IT environment for Web-based and wireless access limits SSL access for rural areas
Opportunities:
State of Illinoiss geographic profile (large area with substantial undeveloped land) underscores the need for more effective supportive service integration Long-term prospects for sustainable quality of life is the primary driver for Statewide GIS SSL System Low level of current GIS use gives huge opportunity for expanded use and benefits There is strong business case, as evidenced by over 100 geographically-related processes, for expanded use of a Cloud-based GIS driven SSL Current, databases is the foundation for key improvements and expanded SSL applications Well-managed GIS in the Cloud configuration provides potential for effective allocation of network resources for GIS SSL System New technology tools and procedures lower costs for GIS database compilation and maintenance Expanded information sharing and project/cost collaboration with external organizations Professional and industry associations are potential allies in garnering support and creati ng heightened awareness for the SSL System Advances in GIS software and computing infrastructure providing platforms for more flexible, powerful, and easy-to-use GIS applications Decreases in cost for GIS data capture and expanded sources of geographic data Enterprise licensing for ESRI software and services provides cost-effective approach for software access as the number of GIS users increases Better leveraging of available GIS training and professional development sources and programs including Web-based training, mentoring Innovative funding sources and financing mechanisms can be leveraged to support the SSL System and lessen the need for new general fund allocations Use of Web-based GIS services to improve availability and use of existing GIS data
Challenges:
Rapidly changing and evolving technologycomplicates the ability to adapt and manage Current economic conditions impact availability of resources to support the SSL System Increased demands by the public for information from government agencies and other organizations create potential role for SSL System (but also an opportunity) Resistance to change in workflow and technology can inhibit necessary adoption and use of SSL System Creating and sustaining official awareness of SSL applications and benefits Geographic disparity in resources limits SSL System development and operation in low-resourced areas Putting in place and sustaining participation and support by community based organizations, government agencies, eternal groups and users Creating an environment with policies that encourage and enable sharing of geographic information Establishing technical environment and processes for integration between GIS and other potential key systems Establishing awareness and keeping the interest and support from senior
p. 10
Positive Factors
Statewide GIS SSL System success in other areas supports business case and presents model for National GIS SSL expansion officials
Negative Factors
p. 11
p. 12
GIS being embraced (through organizational structure and management policies) as one key element of information technology architecture as a means to promote standards, efficient use and management of computing infrastructure, effective IT/GIS support and service delivery, and integration of enterprise systems to access supportive services More extensive use of partnerships and collaboration with outside organizations to reduce and share costs, increase availability of geo spatial data, and enhance access by a larger GIS user community Incorporation of GIS tools in strategies for Web-based information and e-government services
2. The organizational and management structure required to implement and manage a Statewide GIS SSL System addressing organizational structure, staff roles, and management/coordination policies and procedures As described in Section 4, the full Statewide GIS System will evolve over a 5-year period taking advantage of current GIS resources and strengths, incrementally implementing improvements (with interim benefits), and culminating in a mature SSL System that delivers high-quality data and services responding to the needs of users.
p. 13
High-speed wired network access from fixed locations and an increasing access to wide area wireless connections. System architecture that allows both local data storage and processing (desktop environment) and a web-based configuration supporting both central and distributed management of data and services). Tools and easy-to-use applications for capture of GIS data, including data collection and processing, capture of data from aerial images, GIS data conversion from existing database sources, etc. Flexible integration of non-map sources of data with GIS data and applications. Web-based SSL interfaces and tools with the ability to combine locally managed data with any external Web-based service. Full integration of GIS software with database management software allowing handling of spatial data and non-spatial data (alpha-numeric, vector, image, XML) with all needed functionality for database administration (e.g., security, back-up, performance monitoring). Improved support for cartographic design and presentation allowing for easily generated standard and custom map displays with a move from hard copy static maps toward generation and access to near "on-demand", "softcopy" maps. A full set of functions for spatial analysis which can be adapted for a wide range of analysis applications (e.g., overlay modeling, network analysis, service area/district analysis, a range of spatial statistical analysis tools). Easy-to-use tools for customizing the user interface and more complex application development Ability to embed GIS functionality and data in non-GIS applications through access to GIS objects. Robust data, system, and network security with appropriate controls to eliminate unauthorized access or accidental loss or corruption of data.
Completed GIS SSL database that corrects existing data quality problems and adds key data sets needed to support a wide range of applications and needs. Capture and access to a wide range of non-map geographically referenced data sources (text documents, forms, site photos, drawings, external Web sources), integrated with GIS, to support numerous geographic information management applications.
p. 15
p. 16
E. Maintenance Connection
In Stage 2, we recommend a major GIS configuration that will drive the physical, software, and database configurationwith the objective of seamless access and performance and providing the necessary technical platform to deploy a wide range of applications. This recommended configuration is depicted in Figure 3.
p. 17
p. 18
p. 19
The Stage 2 technical design shown in Figure 3 establishes the basic structure for an enterprise GIS SSL System that will be refined and upgraded in Stage 3 and beyond. It sets up a server-centric model with new GIS software (ArcGIS for Server) with full Web access. It also makes use of the more powerful GIS Server in the Cloud geodatabase model with the Enterprise geodatabase structure established in Stage 1. This configuration will require both hardware and software upgrades. On the software side, there is a recommendation to purchase an Enterprise GIS software license from ESRI which gives unlimited access to the most commonly needed server and desktop software as well as providing a variety of support services. The main components of the high-level system architecture are described in Table 6. Table 6: Recommended Enterprise GIS SSL Configuration in Stage 2
A. GIS Server in Cloud Environment
Recommendation calls for the operation of ArcGIS for Server software on the Wallace Co.s Cloud environment in which multiple virtual servers are established and configured for GIS server functions (database, Web, applications). In this Phase, the recommendation is for the Wallace Co. to purchase an enterprise GIS software license from ESRI which provides for full use and maintenance of the most commonly needed server and desktop software packages. Centralized GIS database with an improved design with current personal geodatabases organized into enterprise geodatabase(s) with Server. Central GIS database also includes attribute data files, wellorganized metadata, raster-based orthoimagery, and documents (e.g., scanned and indexed drawings, hyperlinks and documents). The database will be expanded and improved from Stage 1 with additional data components and data quality improvements. Access by selected staff with ArcGIS desktop software. Includes existing licenses being used by selected Wallace Co. offices. With the operation of server-based GIS software (ArcGIS Server in the Cloud), there may be an opportunity to reduce some desktop licenses for users who mainly need query and display capabilities (through Web browser). Maintenance Connection asset management software operating on dedicated Windows server or possibly, in this Phase, configured as part of the Wallace Co.s Virtual Server environment. In Stage 2, the interface is upgraded from the Stage 1 batch process to use the Maintenance Connection direct viewerdirectly accessing data on the Wallace Co.s GIS server.
Server-based Web GIS software in this Phase will provide for field-based access from vehicles and hand-held devices (tablet computers, smart phones) which are configured with GIS software and E. Field and Mobile applications designed for mobile use. This mobile use may be in "disconnected mode" (standalone GIS Access operation without network connection) or through a direct wireless connection using available cell network 3G/4G or services.
F. External Web GIS Services: There are two main options for setting up Web GIS applications for external and public access: G1-Wallace Co. maintained Web server configured with firewall with connection to the main GIS server and G2Use of a hosted server in a cloud which an external organization provides for external hosting of data and applications and Web-access. F1. Wallace Co. Maintained Web Server F2. External Web Server
A dedicated Windows Web Server is configured with a firewall and connection to the main GIS Server in a Cloud providing access to selected Web services by the public or any external organization. Access would be provided via any standard Web browser with or without use of locally configured Web GIS viewer software. Public and external Web GIS using an external hosted service (e.g. ArcGIS Online) to provide access to maps and interactive GIS query applications). This option will require periodic upload of updated GIS data and may require subscription fees.
In Stage 3, the system configuration will not be changed significantly from that proposed for Stage 2 (see Figure 3). There will likely be some hardware (server) upgrades and installation of additional software under the ESRI enterprise license.
p. 20
Enhancement and expansion of GIS and SSL education and training opportunities for technical staff and users.
3.4 Statewide GIS SSL System Organizational and Management Structure 3.4.1 Proposed Organizational Structure
The recommended organizational structure for the Statewide GIS SSL Management System is depicted in Table 7. This structure builds on the current structure now in place but formalizes it and adds certain organizational elements. The recommendation calls for establishing this structure in Stage 1 and refining it in subsequent phases.
p. 21
Description
This Section has main responsibility for administering the GIS database and software (in coordination with the Department of Information Technology) and for coordinating with GIS users in Wallace Co. Departments and Offices. Also, this section has other GIS coordination and management responsibilities: a) preparing and administering GIS operational policies and standards, b) maintenance of selected parts of the GIS database (with support from users), c) database quality control, d) managing development and deployment of GIS software and applications, e) coordination with external organizations, f) GIS vendor/consultant contract management, g) leading/coordinating Technical Committee, h) status monitoring and reporting and communications with Oversight/Policy Body. It is recommended that the Wallace Co. continue to play this role for coordination and management in Stage 1 and Stage 2. It is recommended that for Stage 3, an organizational change be considered that would establish the GIS SSL Management Office in the IT Department. This organizational position is consistent with the role of GIS as one element of the Wallace Co.s overall information technology environment with a requirement for service and support for users in all its Departments. This organizational model (GIS SSL management in the IT Department), follows an approach which, has become prevalent for enterprise GIS programs. This includes all Wallace Co. partnerships, in which GIS SSL users are organizationally located. Departments and divisions with major need and use of GIS will have formally designated GIS SSL liaisons who direct and support GIS or SSL use in their departments or divisions and who are the principle contacts with the other sections. These liaisons (along with other designated people) are members of the GIS SSL Technical Committee most importantly in the area of GIS database maintenance. This is a high-level body created to provide senior oversight for the Statewide GIS SSL System. Its membership is composed of senior managers and potentially an elected official. This body is established primarily to provide direction and approvals for SSL development and operation. It provides a forum for multiple Departments and Organizations to coordinate and reach consensus on GIS issues and decisions affecting all SSL users and relationships with external organizations. More specifically, this body will: a) comment on and approve plans, policies, and standards recommended by Technical Committee, b) review and provide input on budget requests and recommended funding options, c) reviewing and commenting on status reports submitted by the project managers, d) support in resolving conflicts and in encouraging consensus for collaboration on SSL related issues. The Technical Committee includes mid-level managers and technical or operations staff from the Wallace Co. or external organizations. This is a standing committee whose membership may be rotated or added to as necessary. It is led by the Wallace Co. Geospatial Project Manager. The primary purpose of this group to encourage and enable involvement from and coordination among Wallace Co., organizations, and institutions in important GIS development and operation topics and initiatives. The Geospatial Project Manager works closely with this Committee to get input on GIS plans, specifications, recommended policies, upcoming procurements, etc. Decisions are reached through a consensus process. The members of the current Strategic Planning Project team are a good starting point for assembling this committee. Temporary Work Groups are established as needed, by the Technical Committee, to work on and provide recommendations on specific SSL topics or activities. These Work Groups are focused on specific topics and are dissolved when their assignment is completed. Membership may include any Wallace Co. staff person but it also may include appropriate people from external organizations as well as vendors or consultants. Some possible examples of Work Groups are a) GIS database standards and re-design, b) web interface development, c) GIS application deployment. External organizations may include, potentially, any non-Wallace Co. organization with which GIS data may be shared, involved in some type of GIS-related project collaboration, or establish some other type of GIS coordination. These relationships may involve formal agreements or information coordination. The Wallace Co. Geospatial Project Manager has primary responsibility for managing these external organizations but the Technical Committee plays a role as well. Certain types of formal relationships and agreements with external organizations will require the approval of the Oversight/Policy Body.
p. 22
p. 23
specific to the SSL and Management System and other policies and standards that have a direct impact on the project (e.g., IT standards). An outline for such a manual is: A. Personnel and Professional Development: Policies that reference existing personnel policies, as well as any additional ones related to ethics and professional development that specifically relate to IT, GIS or the SSL. B. Standards Compliance: Policies that identify approved technical standards (e.g., data format) and clarify how these apply. C. Contract and Financial Management: Policies that define authority and procedures for budgeting, entering into contracts with private firms, and procedures for managing contracts. D. Project Coordination and Management: Policies that define requirements for project planning (e.g., for a database development project) and all elements of managing and monitoring progress, directing team activities, and project reporting. E. GIS Participation and Project Partnerships: Policies that define procedures and administrative instruments for identifying GIS users and participants (internal and external) and for entering into partnerships for joint project work with participating organizations. F. Data/Product Access and Sharing: Policies that govern access rights to the GIS, specific agreements for data sharing, data distribution limitations, and legal issues for data and product distribution. G. System Administration and Network Security: Policies that direct the use of technical tools, practices for system operation, system monitoring, network security and all aspects of system and database administration. H. User Support and Help Desk Services: Policies that define the nature of support provided by the SSL management, technical support staff or other designated parties and procedures through which, users access support or services. I. Data Maintenance Procedures and Responsibilities: Defines accepted policies for update of GIS data elements, specific procedures and responsibilities for carrying out the update and posting data for general access. Explain procedures for users to report data errors and problems found during routine GIS or SSL use. J. External Communications: Procedures and protocols that govern any external communications about the SSL System including contacts, collaboration with other agencies; media relations and formal press releases; participation in public communication forums; publications; and other external communication activities.
SSL System implementation and enhancement will require additional technical resources to support development and ongoing operations. It is important to make best use of existing personnel as well as non-traditional staffing options (e.g., contract, part-time, limited term or qualified student interns). Recommendations for staffing, over the 5-year period of this plan are summarized in Table 8. Table 8: GIS Staffing/Resourcing Recommendations
Staffing Role/ Position Geospatial Manager Geospatial Project Manager Development Stage/Fiscal Year Current and all future Fiscal Years Current and future Fiscal Years Stage 1 (Fiscal Year 2014) and future Fiscal Years Description and Recommended Approach/Source
For Stages 1 and Stage 2, assign existing GIS management, as the Statewide Manager. Maintain current staff of 1 technical personnel GIS Section. One existing person, in each GIS Departmental, Office, and Divisions (in some case) which are major users of GIS. This person sits in the GIS Technical Committee, communicates with the GIS Management Office, and oversees GIS activities in their Office. Time requirements will vary depending on the specific office but will average about 1 FTE. Allocated time from existing personnel in selected Wallace Co. offices to take part in GIS database maintenance in coordination with the GIS Management Office One or more interns with time equal to 1 to 1.5 FTEs. Source would be several regional colleges and universities with GIS and IT programs which provide undergraduate or graduate students with useful skills in areas of GIS database maintenance and quality control, GIS applications, and IT administration skills. While the potential exists for unpaid internships but the assumption should be for payment at an established hourly rate. New, full-time staff person, with education and previous job experience
Stage 2 (mid Fiscal Year in the use of GIS and database (SQL Server) software, Windows 2015) and future Fiscal operating system administration, database design, and database Years
administration.
Stage 2 (mid Fiscal Year in the use of GIS and database (SQL Server) software, designing and 2016) and future Fiscal development GIS applications, providing support to GIS users, and Years
setting up and providing training.
New, full-time staff person, with education and previous job experience
p. 25
p. 26
standards. This Strategic Plan identifies initiatives for organization and refinement of the design, documentation of standards, and inclusion of database rules. 3. Improve GIS data maintenance tools and procedures, complete development of high-priority data, and continue adding to and improving the quality of existing GIS data. Goal 3 Context and Scope: In concert with Goal #2, the Strategic Plan addresses needs to improve procedures and tools to streamline database and metadata maintenance and to increase the rigor and integrity of quality control checking. In addition, there are initiatives for continual improvement in quality and completion of data sets as they develop. Data maintenance procedures will involve multiple users whose data maintenance responsibilities are clearly defined. 4. Identify a range of funding sources and put in place a sustained financing approach to provide necessary resources for development and ongoing operations. Goal 4 Context and Scope: Expansion and improvement of the SSL System will require funding including several one-time and recurring allocations. The Strategic Plan identifies and calls for exploration of multiple funding sources and financing approaches to provide material support for SSL System development work. Identification of funding needs is accompanied by an identification of benefits that will result. 5. Enhance GIS technology infrastructure (hardware, networks, software) to support broader, more flexible, and secure GIS access by Wallace Co. users and by the external partnership users. Goal 5 Context and Scope: Expansion of the SSL to support broader access to Wallace Co. users, contracted workers, and partnership organizations will require changes and upgrades to hardware, software, and networks. This Strategic Plan lays out an incremental approach to these improvements that provide a cost-effective path which makes best use of available technology in coordination with overall Wallace Co. IT standards and policies. 6. Expand and formalize as necessary collaboration and partnerships with multiple organizations. Goal 6 Context and Scope: This Strategic Plan identifies initiatives that build on current, mutually beneficial relationships with external organizations and expanding partnerships with other organizations in the sharing of data and collaboration on the SSL System project. The purpose is to broaden SSL access, share resources and reduce costs, and expand the pool of GIS expertise for developing data and applications. 7. Provide effective training and education and put in place a promotional program to increase competency and support for the SSL System and awareness of its benefits. Goal 7 Context and Scope: One of the major obstacles to expanding use of GIS is lack of understanding on how to use GIS tools. In addition to enhancing access with easy-to-use GIS applications, there will be enhancements in training for users with different training resources. In addition, more will be done to explain the value and potential benefits of the SSL to management personnelidentifying specific ways the SSL can support existing and future programs and needs.
p. 27
Stage 1Refinement and Preparation for Server in the Cloud GIS (April 2014 to June 2014): In this Stage, Wallace Co. will carry out important activities that lay a foundation for the SSL System expansion in subsequent stages. This Stage includes establishing the beginning of a formal organizational structure for the SSL system which formalizes the roles of all agencies, organizations, and institutions and roles of each department and office. In addition to continuing ongoing work in database development and improvement and GIS services to users, Stage 1 work will include a major organization of the GIS database and implementation of standards and practices for more effective and efficient database maintenance and administration. An important element of this Stage is the implementation of several key, high-priority high-benefit GIS applications to illustrate the value of the SSL System. The SSL will operate on the dedicated server in the cloud with access through ESRI GIS Server licenses coupled with the Amazon web services platform. Work will be done in this Stage to explore, identify, and make progress in securing additional funding sources. Stage 2Establish Initial Enterprise GIS Program (July 2014 to June 2016): Stage 2 involves a major integration of the GIS software and database environment to provide a foundation for a true SSL with Web-based access (internal, public, and mobile app). This includes the acquisition of the GIS software server license and establishment of a server-based GIS environment with website portal. A new technical staff person will be hired and a range of high-priority applications will be developed and deployed. Important database development initiatives ongoing currently and in Stage 1 will be completed. Partnerships with external organizations will also be expanded with a focus on cost sharing approaches. Other funding sources will be pursued as well. Stage 3Expand and Establish Mature Web-Based GIS (July 2016 to June 2018): Stage 3 builds on work in the previous stages to create a mature, SSL System. The organizational structure, policies, and management practices originally set-up in Stage 1 will be enhanced as necessary. Additional applications will be developed and deployed new users will be brought on board with GIS or IT experience.
p. 28
Table 9: Major Actions and Milestones for 5-Year SSL System Development and Deployment
Stage Projected Timing Organizational, Resourcing, and Outreach
Get formal approval of GIS Strategic and Implementation Plans Create Oversight/Policy Body Establish and assign members to GIS SSL Technical Committee Identify "GIS liaison" in each institutional partnership "Brand" SSL project and set-up formal management structure Add to and formalize initial SSL policies (senior management) Prepare budget for FY 2014 Explore funding and financing strategies and secure funding for Stage 2 Select and hire GIS intern Augment partnerships with external organizations and identify project collaboration and joint resourcing opportunities Design and set-up GIS and SSL training/professional development program and execute training for selected people Design and development website and portal Rotate or change as appropriate, membership on the GIS SSL Technical Committee and Oversight/Policy Body Assign/re-assign SSL liaisons Augment training program and involve additional technical staff and users Recruit and hire a new GIS technical support staff member Enhance/expand partnerships with external organizations Recruit a new student intern Create budget for Stage 3 years Identify and secure additional funding sources
Upgrade server and, if determined feasible, migrate GIS to a virtual server environment Acquire ESRI enterprise license Configure server for ArcGIS for server software Design and implement all Very High priority and selected High priority applications Upgrade GIS integration with Maintenance Connection using direct access to GIS database Design and set-up initial mobile app SSL access Set-up web-based environment for public access and deploy initiation applications
p. 29
Stage
Projected Timing
Stage 3: Expand and July 2016 Establish Mature to June 2018 Enterprise GIS and SSL
Rotate or change as appropriate, membership on Participate in new orthoimagery acquisition program the GIS SSL Technical Committee and Oversight/Policy Body Initiate and execute work on new database Assign/re-assign liaisons as necessary development work identified in Stage 2 Recruit a new student intern Continue to train existing and new users Recruit and hire an additional GIS technical support staff member Continue external organization partnerships and form new ones Create budget for future years Identify and secure additional funding sources
p. 30
FY2013
$80,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
$25,000
$330,000
B. Computer Hardware
$20,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$10,000
$75,000
$129,000
$85,000
$50,000
$40,000
$85,000
$389,000
$7,500
$17,500
$12,500
$22,500
$7,500
$67,500
E. Staff
$275,000
$290,000
$285,000
$275,000
$275,000
$1,400,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$100,000
xx
$228,500
$324,500
$313,500
$323,500
$300,500
$2,361,500
p. 31
A critical element to developing a SSL is to establish a vision, followed by measurable goals and objectives. Goals and objectives create a mutual framework for stakeholders and will drive subsequent decisionmaking throughout the implementation of the SSL. This Strategic Plan defines goals, an overall design, and an approach for a SSL which will: Focus on responding to important needs of the system and its identified strategic goals Deliver substantial financial and non-financial benefits in the short-term and long-term Build and capitalize on existing networks, systems, and geographic data investments to establish a robust, sustainable system and database architecture
The Wallace Corporation p. 32
Put in place a more effective GIS management and improved collaboration among the Wallace Co. and partnerships with additional organizations Explores a range of funding and financing alternatives for sustained support for SSL development and operations Justification for moving ahead with an expanded SSL System is summarized in the following points: 1. The Wallace Co. has made past investments and continues to invest in the SSL System development but is not fully realizing benefits from this investment. A SSL System calls for this Strategic Plan to efficiently capitalize on existing investments and deliver greatly increased benefits to the SSL System. 2. The Wallace Co. has identified a range of processes which could be supported by the SSL. Currently, there is a major gap between service providers and end users. The SSL will offer opportunities to use and provide benefits which streamline connections. 3. The SSL will provide essential tools to manage and encourage growth in an efficient way which is responsive to regulations, the needs of the service providers, and the quality of life of the local communities. 4. An expanded and well-managed SSL System can help reduce costs and lessen the need to add new staff to respond to future needs.
p.33
benefits, more difficult to quantify, which result in significant improvements to organizations. Benefits from the use of GIS technology and data generally fall into the following categories: Operational and Efficiency Gains: Expected gains in current personnel efficiency and productivity allowing work to be accomplished in less time and with less expense. Cost Savings: Reduction in current monetary expenses such as contract costs and direct expenses. Cost Avoidance: Lowering or completely avoiding increased costs that would be incurred without the use of GIS technology, when new programs, regulatory requirements, or other new demands are placed on existing organizations. Revenue Enhancement: Use of GIS technology and data in applications and organizational processes that result in increased revenue from existing or new sources. Difficult-to-Predict Quantitative Benefits: Potential benefits that can be measured in monetary or other terms (time, volume, etc.) but which are not easily predictable or regular in nature and which do not easily contribute to a return on investment analysis. Non-quantifiable Benefits: Benefits that cannot be easily quantified but which have positive impacts on operations, decision-making, quality of service, or a range of social and long-term benefits to economic or environmental health. Some examples of benefits that fall under these benefit types are listed below in Table 11. Some of the benefit examples are listed under multiple categories since they are subject to different levels of measurability.
p.34
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
5.3.2 Actual Anticipated SSL Benefits for Clients and Participating Organizations
This strategic planning project, through its examination of various processes and operations, has identified a number of specific and achievable benefits that can result from a properly implemented and operated SSL System. Table 12 summarizes these benefit opportunities. This benefits evaluation conservatively projects at least $650,000 in annual savings (actual monetary savings, staff time reduction, and revenue enhancement). These tangible benefits are complemented by a range of benefits which cannot easily be measured or projected but which will deliver striking positive impacts for individuals in
p.35
Non-quantifiable
need, service providers and general public. These intangible benefits identified in Table 12 contribute to improved response and customer service, reduced calendar time for many service provider processes, better quality service and decision making, increased social development opportunities, improved public safety, and other areas that support the SSL strategic goals.
p.36
Table 12: Potential SSL Benefits for Clients and Service Providers
Benefit Explanation
A.
Efficiency gains in current use of staff and reductions in calendar time for critical service processes and tasks.
However, a GIS with high quality, up-to-date information, readily accessible (including accessibility by staff) can support reductions in staff time and elimination of some field visits. This savings is a direct result of having data and accurate location-based information readily available to answer some questions without the need for a field visit and being able to quickly find local services. If a conservative estimate of a 5% efficiency gain is applied to the total identified above, this translates to a labor cost savings of 5,000 hours. But for certain operations, the efficiency gain would likely be higher. Based on the identification of over 120 current service provider processes that rely on geographic information, it is recognized that most staff have at least a periodic need to find and review maps or geographic information in document, table, or database form. For many service provider employees, this is a routine need to address response to requests for information, organizational data, special planning projects, financial analysis, as well as a wide range of development review and infrastructure design, development, and maintenance activities. Experiences of other users show that a well-designed and maintained SSL can reduce, by 50% or more, the time it takes to find and access needed maps and geographic information. The Wallace Co. could expect to see efficiency gains of several thousand hours annually for routine geographic information retrieval, in addition to the projected hour savings stated above. In addition, incorporating Web-based GIS applications for public use will help reduce time burdens on staff by increasing availability of on-line information and eGov services.
A2: General time savings in locating and using maps and geographic information
B.
Reductions in the dollar costs for social programs and increase in revenue for providers.
Taking into account staff time and direct costs, service providers spend considerable funds on routine monitoring and maintenance of operations. As in the case of many organizations in the USA, Wallace Co. has identified the potential for significant savings in costs and labor time from more effective evaluationand planning and decision making for major projects that might require the expenditure of significant funds for infrastructure. These planning decisions will become more of a concern and the potential benefits will rise. Projecting tangible benefits from using the SSL for better operational planning and allocation of resources is difficult but other agencies have experienced significant savings in staff time and reductions in contract costs (in some cases over 20%). Effective application of GIS as an integral part of the supportive service location management has a high likelihood of delivering substantial benefits. In any given year, different service providers carry out a variety of projects that involve staff time as well as contractor costs. Use of an improved SSL can result in a savings of contract costs by providing accurate maps and data on existing conditionsreducing costs for data collection and mapping. In addition, the GIS can provide data and tools so that more of the special project work can be carried out by in-house staff. Contracted cost savings could easily exceed 15% and for certain projects would likely be much higherparticularly for work carried out by in -house personnel
B1: Cost savings from more effective Infrastructure assessment and maintenance
C. Improvements in Quality of Customer Service and Response : Measurable enhancement and improvements in the timing and content of response to questions and required actions for the public or the business community. C1: General response to questions and complaints from the public C2: Improved response to information requests via Web-based applications
Interactive, Web-based GIS applications (in some cases integrated with other Web-based eGov tools) will allow community based organizations and the general public to query and retrieve geographic information to view maps and answer routine questions about a range of topics This has the potential for freeing up service provider staff time while delivering information more quickly to customers.
p.37
Benefit
C3: Internal staff conferences, sharing of information and collaboration
Explanation
Through effective displays of maps and associated data, GIS technology supports the integration and presentation of geographic information from multiple sources and organizations. GIS and SSL applications will support collaboration and decision-making on many projects and initiatives. GIS tools support meetings involving multiple agencies and reaching a consensus based on accurate information.
Improvements in services provided to the public and community based organizations (transportation, recreational, cultural) and sustaining rapid and appropriate response to emergency events (police, fire, EMS) as the SSL grows.
F. Benefit Opportunities from External Collaboration and Funding: Reduction in costs and contributions from outside sources for critical GIS development initiatives and projects.
One of the most effective ways to contain costs associated with a major enhancement of the SSL system is to share costs with an external, partner agencies. The Wallace Co. has already taken advantage of such opportunities in certain GIS database development. These data sharing partnerships will continue and will deliver cost savings in future years. There are other potential opportunities for cost sharing with external organizations (and reduction of Wallace Co. costs) for SSL development and operation. Such opportunities may include:
The Wallace Co. has a small but active staff assigned to research and apply for grants from Federal and State agencies and other sources. Significant time is required to identify possible grant opportunities and prepare grant applicationsbut the payoff can be significan t. Some grant programs have a significant geographic componenteither directly involving GIS technology or calling for geographic analysis and mapping for the grant application. GIS technology can be used to support and streamline the grant application process (and increase chances of an award) and GIS can be used in executing work called for by the grant. ESRI, a GIS software company summarizes GIS impacts on grant application and execution. Because of staff limitations for conducting grant research and application, the Wallace Co. is not pursing some potential opportunities that could deliver increased revenue. In some cases, grant programs for which the Wallace Co. is not an eligible lead applicant, there are opportunities for partnering with external agencies (e.g., County or State) and participate in a grant award.
F3: Software license cost sharing F4: More effective use of resources for GIS support
In the future, assigning appropriate resources for GIS support, which is currently in the works, will improve GIS database maintenance and use of GIS applications while off-loading some staff time now applied to GIS support.
p.38
6. CONCLUSIONS
This Strategic Plan for a Statewide GIS SSL is built upon information gathered in Phase 1 of this project. This Phase 1 work established a foundation for a SSL design and planning. This Strategic Plan establishes a long-term strategic foundation for a SSL System in the form of several key elements: close connections with and support for Wallace Co.s Vision and Mission a clear GIS Supportive Service Locator mission statement and set of high-level goals that focus on future development and operations a definition of the organizational context for the SSL including Wallace Co. offices that will use the SSL and outside organizations with which other agencies will share data and resources A SWOC evaluation (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges) which helps to focus the planning process A definition of SSL System processes and business drivers and how this system supports industry requirements This Strategic Plan provides solid information for planning the SSL implementation and operations. This includes: a) a technical architecture addressing system configurations, software, and applications components of the SSL defines a technical and organizational architecture, b) an organizational structure addressing GIS management, staffing, SSL program oversight, Statewide coordination, and collaboration with outside organizations and the public, c) timing for development stages and key initiatives over a multi-year period, and d) a multi-year budget for the SSL System development and operations. Finally, this Strategic Plan includes a business case and discussion of potential tangible and intangible benefits that can results from a well-designed, properly implemented, and effectively operated SSL System. This business case, in Section 5 shows substantial opportunities for benefits including cost and staff time savings but more as wellparticularly in the way it supports sound access to service providers for individuals in need. Strategic Plan (Phase 2): Includes a technical and organizational design for the SSL System and a strategic plan addressing mission, goals, and major initiatives for implementation and operation. The final Phase of this SSL planning project is the preparation of an Implementation Plan (Phase 3): Defines the details tasks, timing, roles, responsibilities, and resources needed for the SSL development and future operations.
p.39