This document summarizes Martin Moulton's testimony to the Council of the District of Columbia regarding the Judiciary and Public Safety Budget Oversight Hearing. Moulton argues that educational opportunities should be offered to incarcerated individuals to reduce recidivism and help them become productive members of society. He also argues that legalizing and regulating drugs could be more effective and cost-saving than the current approach to the War on Drugs. Moulton provides examples of drug sale prices in DC to support his points.
This document summarizes Martin Moulton's testimony to the Council of the District of Columbia regarding the Judiciary and Public Safety Budget Oversight Hearing. Moulton argues that educational opportunities should be offered to incarcerated individuals to reduce recidivism and help them become productive members of society. He also argues that legalizing and regulating drugs could be more effective and cost-saving than the current approach to the War on Drugs. Moulton provides examples of drug sale prices in DC to support his points.
This document summarizes Martin Moulton's testimony to the Council of the District of Columbia regarding the Judiciary and Public Safety Budget Oversight Hearing. Moulton argues that educational opportunities should be offered to incarcerated individuals to reduce recidivism and help them become productive members of society. He also argues that legalizing and regulating drugs could be more effective and cost-saving than the current approach to the War on Drugs. Moulton provides examples of drug sale prices in DC to support his points.
Judiciary and Public Safety Budget Oversight Hearing
10:00AM, Thursday, April 10, 2014, Room 500
John A Wilson Building Council of the District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004
Re: Department of Corrections Ofce of Returning Citizen Affairs
Good afternoon Councilmember Wells, Councilmember Bonds and Committee staff.
Thank you for holding this important hearing on the Department of Corrections and the Ofce of Returning Citizens Affairs.
My name is Martin Moulton and Im a public volunteer on the ANC6E Public Safety Committee in Shaw in your Ward Mr Wells and a neighbor of Councilmember Bonds. The experience working on the committee in just the past year following criminal cases in our community has been eye opening.
When low level offenders are given better education in how to commit serious crimes while incarcerated than how to live productive lives contributing to their families and communities, we all suffer.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, according to a NY Times article this week, proposed this year that college degree programs be offered to convicted persons while they are incarcerated. But this initiative was shot down by a lot of very short sighted people even though there was an enormous estimated cost savings. In New York State, [Governor Cuomo noted that the cost $5,000 per inmate per year would be a bargain compared with the $60,000 it costs to incarcerate a prisoner for a year. I imagine there would be comparable cost savings for the DC jail. In a controlled environment, it shouldn't be difficult for students to get to class.
When a returning citizen has easier and more abundant opportunities to spend a couple of hours to make $500-$2000 in the sale of tiny quantities of drugs tax free, despite the risks than s/he would getting a lawful 9-5 job working 40+ hours per week, its not difcult to understand their rationale for reoffending or the temptations and nancial pressures they face in our challenging and competitive employment market.
Given advances in educational technology, classes being offered online and instruction from some of the Nations top institutions being broadcast for free via YouTube and iTunes, a small investment by the government to promote educational degree opportunities, in the DC Jail, might greatly reduce recidivism and better prepare returning citizens to become productive members of society.
When you and Councilmember Grosso consider the War on Drugs, not just the War on Marijuana, you must factor in the enormous costs wasted failing to control personal choices and behavior and reduce the prevalence of drugs in the community through the criminal justice system from policing, to DC jail incarceration, to preparing arrestees and convicted persons to overcome their criminal records and become productive members of society. Im not the rst person to argue that Legalization, Regulation and Taxation of all narcotics, like alcohol and tobacco, would be a more effective, humane and cost saving method to address the War on Drugs which would better serve both the DOC and ORCA and keep our communities safer.
Thank you for your time and attention to this issue.
Martin Moulton 1510 Fifth Street NW, Washington DC 20001 (202) 422-1161 @ShawingtonTimes
( The following pages include example of what two varieties of drugs sell for in the District and in your Ward. )
1oz of PCP can sell for approximately $1200 on the streets of the District
The non violent offender who was convicted for possession of this vial has been incarcerated # for more than a year (2013 CF2 004726: District of Columbia v. Derrick J. HInton) Crack Cocaine sold in 2012 in the Lincoln Westmoreland community of Shaw in Ward 6 near the Cleveland Elementary and Maya Angelou Schools.
Seven, now convicted drug dealers, have been incarcerated since their arrests in 2012 and 2013 until their separate sentencing hearings which are scheduled to take place tomorrow and through June this year. (2012 CF2 016141: DC v Isaiah Green and 2013 CF2 001589: DC v. Antonio Peoples et al)
$20 $700 1/2 oz ~$150 1/8 oz Crack Cocaine Cash Sales in ANC6E / Shaw Re: Video Visitation
Department of Corrections does monitor and record telephone inmate calls outside the facility, Id imagine that any video recording would need to be recorded as well. The recent four month U Street Murder Trial (DC v Marcellus Jackson, Kier Johnson, et al), which convicted four murderous drug gang felons, relied on many hours of recorded inmate telephone call evidence. Inmates do not and should not have the right to absolute privacy. The recorded evidence in the U Street case revealed that the incarcerated inmates were indeed passing along criminal instructions and code words via telephone communications. Unlike popular video social media, any video visitation should be recorded by the DOC.
Also, in New York, several years ago they instituted a program where inmates could connect productively with their children by recording themselves reading children books for their children which enhances parental connections the inmates own literacy skills. Many incarcerated persons have children and incarceration destroys some very important nurturing opportunities which technology might help to restore if implemented properly.