Career Progression Committee Applicant Review

Worksheet
Applicant Information
Name: Department/College : Applying for Progression
to:

IDP Included: Yes No Current Title: Degree:

Terminal?:
Department Vote: Last Semester SEI Score: Most Recent Merit
Dean’s Recommendation:

CPC Member Comments and Evaluation

Teaching
Overall Score: 01 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:

Professional Development/Creative Activity/Scholarship and Service

Overall Score: 0 1 2 3 4
Comments:

Areas of Effectiveness And/Or Unique Expertise

Comments:

Areas for Improvement

Comments:

This worksheet is for your own comments and will not be submitted to the
committee. You will logon to D2L to complete a survey on each candidate
with your ratings in each of the two areas on a 0-4/6 scale. The document
contains highly confidential information. Please shred or return to
the Faculty Senate Office for disposal after the Career
Progression Committee reaches its final decision regarding promotion.
 Career Progression Committee Teaching Effectiveness Measures
This worksheet is for your use and will not be submitted to the
committee.

EvidenceNo
Sources of Evidence

EvidenceMinimal

EvidenceStrong
Comments

The Instructor him/herself

Philosophy Statement*
Learning objectives provided in syllabus
(representative samples of course syllabi are
required)
Teaching development activities (research as
preparation, creation of curriculum materials, et
al.)
Innovations in curriculum (significant course
development or pedagogy changes - especially in
response to in class assessments of student
learning)
Graduate Level Teaching/Involvement
(if applicable)

Other (explain in comments)

Information on teaching methods and
effectiveness
Direct measures of student learning (pre-post
tests, selected exam components, fieldwork
observations, writing examples coded for specific
objectives obtained).
Indirect measures of student learning (e.g.,
student assessment of learning gains, focus
groups or exit interviews re: a specific course;
percent time in active learning)
Evidence of effective use of technology in
teaching
Case studies or sample work by students
(annotated by instructor to illustrate a learning
outcome)
Student evaluation of instruction
SEI scores (comparative to department)*
Student comments (systematically collected from
all students and analyzed)
Peer evaluation of teaching effectiveness
Departmental Promotion letter*
Classroom observations by peers and/or external
experts
Teaching awards
Other:

Grading Distributions (comparative to dept)

*Materials required for CPC review.

Career Progression Committee – Professional Development,

Creative Activity, Scholarship, and/or Service Appraisal
Worksheet
This worksheet is for your use and will not be submitted to the
committee.

EvidenceNo

EvidenceStrong
EvidenceMinimal
Comments

Narrative Statement (required)

Professional Development, Creative Activity, Scholarship

Professional Development – Conferences, workshops, coursework,

mentoring, certifications
Creative Activity – exhibitions, publications, recitals,
performances, production
Scholarship – research, publications, grants, presentations,
translations, SOTL

Service – providing advising, mentoring, or in-service training;

organizing multi-sectioned courses or workshops; grant admin.
Leadership roles

Professional Service – professional society and/or discipline related

service to an organization
Connection to disciplinary expertise

University Service

Departmental service

College level service

University level service – committees

 University level service - special taskforces, projects and/or
search & screen

Community Service - volunteer or civic work in the community

Connection to disciplinary expertise

Other service of note

Describe:
IF applicable: service as related to explicit service expectations of
candidate’s department/discipline