Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Examples to be Covered
Shortfall in coating life Multiple factors in Row 1 blade failure Creep related deformation because of temperature issues Disc rim
Vibration Cracking Post Failure
Combustion
Liner collapse and flashback Burner tube detachment
Page 1
Nominal recommended life: 48,000 h Nominal life to overhaul: 24,000 h Supplied with standard bill of material CoCrAlY + Al coating
inadequate oxidation resistance
Page 2
Environmental Attack
Loss of material/load bearing section
oxidation/corrosion of uncoated substrate failure of coating attack from internal cooling surfaces
see case study later
Page 3
Loss of aluminium diffusing into the substrate The reservoir of protective elements is reduced, leading eventually to failure Rate of degradation/attack depends on
metal temperature nature of the environment (species present) mode of operation
cyclic/continuous
type of coating!
Standard of deposition
Oxide scale Cr, Al region depleted of Al,Cr RESIDUAL COATING interdiffusion zone Ni, Co
Cr, Al
Page 4
200 m
9
ERA Technology Ltd
200 m
10
ERA Technology Ltd
Page 5
End of Life?
Even when coating failed, substrate has its own level of environmental resistance.
Failure of coating does not equal failure of blade!
Up to the point when the coating is breached, it does protect the substrate.
Cracking can by pass this!
11
residual coating
interface
attack of substrate
200 m
12
ERA Technology Ltd
Page 6
13
Outcome
A design issue
Either blade temperatures incorrectly calculated
Especially at the tip
14
Page 7
Some unusual forms of crack initiation and growth in low temperature regimes have been encountered (in another OEMs blades)
Blade failures have resulted from this form of cracking Growth from inside blade shanks Not covered by standard design approach
15
16
Page 8
To illustrate that even competent OEM's make design mistakes The users are the first one to accumulate significant operating hours on new or redesigned components
17
Blade/Operating Details
Row 1 blading Equiaxed proprietary superalloy 11 camberline cooling holes Overaluminised CoCrAlY external coating No coating in cooling holes Base loaded unit In 1992 blades replaced at 21,000 h and 25 cycles after recommendation from manufacturer
18
Page 9
Background
Late 1980s: Blade cooling and alloy altered by the OEM
Problems in-service (including failures) led to modification of the external coating to an overaluminised CoCrAlY No internal coating used This is the blade examined here (in 1992)
19
20
Page 10
200 m
21
ERA Technology Ltd
Extensive Voiding and Crack Formation Around Trailing Edge Cooling Hole
500 m
22
ERA Technology Ltd
Page 11
300
2/3 span
200
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
23
950
Temperature (C)
850
PRESSURE SURFACE
SUCTION SURFACE
800 -1 -1 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
24
Page 12
Other Points
Microstructure considerably coarsened
inferred local metal temperatures 900-950C
25
Balance of Considerations
OEM
oxidation of cooling hole surface reduction in cooling flow
increase in metal temperature
However
superalloy creep behaviour not that sensitive to condition of surface
coated/uncoated can have very similar deformation behaviour
Crept material will form oxidised surface cracks Indication of creep elsewhere in the blade where cooler Indications that root of problem is high metal temperatures
26
ERA Technology Ltd
Page 13
27
28
Page 14
OEM Reappraisal
OEM carried out instrumented field trial of unit Also examined many ex-service blades Reversed their earlier conclusions
material issues secondary primary reason was that blade ran hotter than expected
ie design had never been fully validated (not OEM statement)
29
30
Page 15
31
axial deflection of nozzles deflection of shrouds distortion of combustion cans or hot gas path seals/joints
32
Page 16
Alstom 13E2 row 2 and 3 blades Ballooning (see picture) or tip deflection of the knife edges/shroud Shroud ballooning
33
Alstoms Modification: 1
Initial assessment: Knife edge wear (see below) allowing extra hot gas to flow over shroud
Shrouds then creep from higher temperatures So: Add a hard facing to tips of knife edge to reduce wear
General configuration
34
ERA Technology Ltd
Excessive wear
Page 17
What level of verification of the design/design assumptions has been carried out?
35
cooler
isotherms
Page 18
Alstoms Modification: 2
Still ballooning found in service so re-assessed by Alstom
Knife edge geometry altered
Profile plus thinned edges
Shroud edges reinforced Shroud surface cooling i.e. reduced bending load and reduced temperatures
38
Page 19
Outcome
Alstom resolved a design issue
Temperature distribution not as they expected
Shroud running hotter than intended
39
40
Page 20
41
0.25
0.2
Suction Surface
0.15
Pressure Surface
0.1
0.05
Leading Edge
0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
Position on aerofoil
42
Page 21
Outcome
A design problem
Temperature distribution not as expected
Shroud running slightly hotter than expected
Extra inspection and boroscope monitoring required Premature replacement for some units
43
44
Page 22
Resonance Issues
Resonance
intrinsic
design missed them, or considered the excitation to be acceptable (low amplitude)
brought about by other changes eg reduced blade damping through degraded shroud interlocking.
Faster degradation as ran hotter than expected
45
Cracking found at a routine inspection A known problem for this design of unit
46
Page 23
47
Approach
Fractography:
High cycle fatigue No defect at initiation site
Metallography
Material to specification
Engineering
In line with known engine behaviour
48
Page 24
Outcome
Fundamentally a design issue May have to manage it as an operational issue
Stay out of certain speed bands
49
50
Page 25
Crack
51
GEs Actions
Initial:
Field blend of the edge of the slot Peening to induce compressive residual stress
Result
Not a robust/reliable process Much tighter control required over the field process
Better procedures
If crack found
Scrap off the disc
52
Page 26
Outcome
This is a design issue
Even if it one which may not have been covered in the standard design procedures
53
54
Page 27
55
Approach
Site examination of the failed unit Selection of parts for more detailed examination Fractography and metallography Fracture mechanics
Crack initiation and growth
56
Page 28
Failed Posts
Other disc posts cracked Crack growing away from lowest serration
Crack initiating at several positions along the serration
57
Disc serrations
58
Page 29
Microstructural
Alloy microstructure as expected Tensile and impact properties as expected Cracks heavily oxidised
Based on estimated temperature these had possibly been there for 10-50,000 h
59
Fracture Mechanics
Assessed residual load bearing area and stress intensity (K1) at tip of crack
These consistent with final fast fracture at the observed crack size
However, unclear why the cracks had initiated in the first place
Design? Dimensional error in disc fixing? Operating cycle?
60
Page 30
Outcome
Technically not conclusive
Scope of work did not require ultimate answer Possibly design issue
61
62
Page 31
63
64
Page 32
Background
Design of liner prone to cracking in normal operation at weld/change in section
can lead to collapse of the liner these had occurred without other damage to unit
65
Damage to Liner
66
Page 33
67
Failure Event
Sequence of events
over a couple of weeks - slow change in some specific exhaust temperature thermocouples
but max min spreads unchanged
Finally, more rapid change over ~15 minutes unit tripped on high EGT
On opening unit
head of one combustion can disintegrated extensive turbine damage from entrained material
68
Page 34
Day
69
60
40
20
0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Day
70
Page 35
Before
71
ERA Technology Ltd
After
Assessment
Collapse of liner and subsequent flashback Response of system an intrinsic feature of the design
under certain circumstances
72
Page 36
Outcome
A design issue Actions from the OEM
design change to liner design change to burners instigation of 24 h/day monitoring of all plant plus tighter limits
73
Load
e.g. when under frequency response or running at part load
Requires installation of online monitoring equipment for the operator to be able to manage the issues
Goy et al 2005
74
ERA Technology Ltd
Page 37
Goy et al 2005
75
ERA Technology Ltd
Crack
Missing tube
NB: these pictures are not from the machines referred to in Goy et al 2005
76
Page 38
Failure Process
High cycle fatigue Growth from hidden surface
Not visible until break surface
Crack start at geometric notch where burner tubes welded to the end cap
Attachment weld
Burner tube
Weld
End cap
Weld Configuration
Weld thickness variable at joint
Uninspectable
Weld
78
Page 39
Assessment
The process is driven by the presence of large high cycle fatigue loads
i.e. from periods of high combustion dynamics
79
Consequences
Best case: burner tube/tubes detach and enter turbine
Some damage to turbine blades
Worst case: burner tube detaches and jams in the Stage 1 nozzle
Row 1 blade high cycle fatigue failure in a few hours
80
Page 40
Outcome
A design issues
The design is not sufficiently tolerant to ranges of fuel encountered in service
Operator
Increase in targeted monitoring
Combustion dynamic probes Continuous monitoring Possibly also writing own software to automatically alter operating condition when high dynamics encountered 81
ERA Technology Ltd
82
Page 41
83
However
Can alter the mechanical properties of the tip
If tip temperature >~1000C
Untempered martensite forms on cooling Hard if 12Cr steel Soft if GTD 450 type alloys
Page 42
Tip Rubbing: 2
Whilst the vibratory stress levels at the tip may be acceptable
for normal material
85
Tip Rubbing: 3
Liberated corner can move upstream
eg impact trailing edge of upstream stator
high cycle fatigue of stator (see right)
86
Page 43
87
Overall Design
Overall compressor design driven by performance needs
Mass flow, number of stages etc
Page 44
Sources of Excitation
The aerodynamic design of the blades and vanes must avoid:
Stall
Detachment of flow over the aerofoil At steady state conditions
Some stall during run up almost inevitable
Rotating Stall
Stall cells between blades Except as a stop/start transient effect
But see GEs experience with R0 blades
Flutter
Self excitation due to flow characteristics
89
Corrosion/pitting resistance
Of considerable importance because of effect on high cycle fatigue strength
Toughness
Tolerance to some small scale impacts
90
Page 45
91
92
Page 46
Blade Testing
Blade natural frequencies determined to verify calculated frequencies from FE model
Blade Jig
1 0 0
1 0 Acceleration (m/s^2)
Table
0 .1
F re q u e n c y ra n g e w h e rejig e x h ib its e re s o n a n c 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 3 0 0 0
Accelerometers
0 .0 1 3 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 F rq u e n c y(H z)
93
Displacements
Stress
94
Page 47
A Mode 8 Distortion
Maximum stress in the upper aerofoil
Displacements
Stress
95
Tip Modes
Maximum stresses at/near the blade tip Relevance to cracks growing down off a tip rubbed blade
Displacements
Stress
96
Page 48
Sources of Excitation
Nozzle passing frequency
Each time blades passes behind a nozzle
Change in incident flow angle and pressure (a wake) This is a fatigue cycle
Can include
Immediate upstream row Next upstream row Immediate downstream row
Bow wave (as opposed to a wake)
Campbell Diagram
Mode 1 Mode 2
3500
3000
2000
1500
1000
500
98
Page 49
99
Some OEMs allow a closer interference as they tune each blade; so less spread in set Not within a box at 1% of running speed
Grid range To allow for calculated errors 100
Page 50
Acceptance criteria
Usually expressed via Goodman diagram
101
Goodman Diagram: 1
Shows allowable alternating stress range for a 107 cyclic life as a function of the mean stress
Goodman Diagram
500
450
400
50% of limit
350 Stress Amplitude ( MPa)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Mean stress (MPa) 600 700 800 900 1000
102
Page 51
Goodman Diagram: 2
Some corrosion/pitting and surface degradation is inevitable in service
Significant effect on high cycle fatigue properties
OEM-2: have used property line at 50% of -3 deviation USAF ENSIP (MIL-HDBK-1783B-2002)
Almost the only public domain document on this subject Use 60% of -3 standard deviation at 109 cycles
103
Goodman Diagram: 3
Design objective
Actual vibratory stresses must lie below the design line Under steady state operating conditions Are these satisfactory margins?
Debate in the industry!
Damage tolerance (eg against nicks/impacts/tip rubs) may not explicitly incorporated into the design
Covered by the general design margin
104
ERA Technology Ltd
Page 52
105
Stator Vanes
Vanes also subjected to vibration
Passage of blades upstream/downstream of them produce similar flow/pressure fluctuations Similar analysis needs to be carried out
106
Page 53
107
108
Page 54
Cracking
Cracks grew away from trailing edge bridge
Growth related to number of stop/start cycles
Thermal fatigue with bending stresses
109
Crowther 2004
110
ERA Technology Ltd
Page 55
Outcome
Principally a design issues
As manifested by a (probable) TBC thickness specification
Coating thickness requirement altered R1 blade design altered some years later as part of general design of the turbine Operator
Additional inspections between scheduled ones to monitor crack growth (if cracks present)
Critical length considered to be ~30 mm
111
May not act in isolation from other influencing factors May take OEM many years to identify, redesign, verify and field test a modification The operators have to find ways to deal with the consequences
i.e. how to monitor the situation to minimise the risk of failures
112
Page 56