Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INDEX
Part 1
About IBM IBM Research & Use Case Smarter Planet
Part 2
Data Data Science Big Data Analytics
Part 1 About IBM IBM Research & Use Case Smarter Planet
IBM
IBM
: 1967 4 25, IBM1401 IBM 100% : 1,135
65() 73 1,179 9 37
()
( )
2011
2010
2009
12,061
1,304.4
12,250
987.9
12,068
633.5
, IT ,
2011.03 45 - 2011.01 IT ' (ACO) AA 2009.11 IBM 2008.12 IT ' 2008.09 2007.04 IBM 40 2007.03 1 2004 3000 2003 IBM 2002 IBM (SI)
(, , DB) ,
, , , ,
(GBS)
IT (GTS)
(SWG)
Database Web Application Groupware
(STG)
Unix Svr NT POS I Series
(GPS)
CRM
(R&D)
Trend
(IGF)
/ / /
(, , DB) ,
, , , ,
Growth Initiative
Large Deal
Sector
FSS
Consulting Service
S&T (Strategy & Transformation)
I&G (Innovation & Growth) BAO (Business Analytics & Optimization) EA (Enterprise Applications)
SO Sales
SO (Strategic Outsourcing) Sales
GTS SD
GTS Service Delivery
SO Client Service
SO (Strategic Outsourcing) Client Service
ITS
ITS (Information Technology Services)
ST&MA&C M
Strategy& Marketing*CM
MTS
MTS (Maintenance and Technical Support)
OFFERGROUP
Offering Group
Commercial
Delivery Excellence
Electronics
ITS COVERAGE
ITS
ITS Delivery
ITS Presale & Delivery
ITS SALES
Opportunity Owner
Operation
IBM ,
IBM , 6
IBM 6
IBM GBS
IT
IBM GTS
IT
IBM GPS
IT
IBM STG
IBM SWG
,
IBM Financing
Zurich
Haifa
Tokyo
1986
1961
1955
1972
1982
Austin
China
1995 1995
Ireland
New!
1995
Brazil
Africa
India
Australia
2010
2010
2012
1998
Analytics enable better Decisions for Water System Management (Washington D.C. Water and Sewer Authority)
Failure Association
How does environmental conditions impact failure? Does one brand hydrant fail more frequently than the other brand? How does aging process impact asset condition?
Failure Prediction
Which hydrant will fail most likely in the next 6 months? What type of failure will most likely happen given the current condition? How likely is the pipe segment going to fail?
Replacement
What is the state of the water delivery and sewage disposal? What is the best to allocate capital for infrastructure network upgrade? PM Optimization
Preventive Maintenance
Can I reduce PM cost? Which failures are driving my water mains repair costs? Which pipes should I replace to prevent challenges next winter?
Application of these techniques in an engagement with Washington D.C. Water and Sewer Authority resulted in 25% increase in maintenance crew utilization 30-50% cost savings on selected inspection and preventive maintenance significant revenue increase through loss prevention and differential pricing
Preventive Maintenance for Water System (Washington D.C. Water and Sewer Authority)
Optimize preventive maintenance time for each hydrant by considering the following factors: Inspection cost for PM before failure Repair cost given failure Penalty cost during downtime Failure risk
Periodic inspection interval Inspection cost Repair cost Penalty cost
Min
Downtime (repair)
s.t.
Max allowable periodic inspection interval (364 days)
Maintenance planning
1005
Prediction
Optimization Real-time analytics
Optimized Maintenance Plan
3 Response Plan
4 Data Assimilation
5 Revised Outage
6 Revised Response
7 Plan Execution
8 Report
Number or Records: 52, 206 for 34 regions Response Categories: 13 (C1~C13) Data Characteristics:
- target: daily damage counts in multiple categories - predictors: 1. Cumulative rainfall in the preceding two weeks; 2. In Day 0, -1, and -2: aggregate the weather conditions
Damages
12A M
24 hour
Day 0
Weather conditions
24 hour Day -2
Day -1
The scheduling problem needs to integrate the Production schedule with the maintenance schedule so as to avoid maintenance during high demand for a machine The system is currently deployed and generating schedules daily at IBMs East Fishkill 300mm semi-conductor manufacturing plant.
Maintenance Scheduling
outliers UCL_CUSUM
Step II
Comparison of the the chamber of interest and the control band from the other chambers (Mean m*Std)
SVID
Chamber i
UCL
LCL
time
Out of control
T-squared Value
10
15
Phase-I design
Phase-II design
0
0 50 100 Wafer Label 150 200 250 2013 IBM Corporation
Gas flows
Virtual metrology (VM) generally refers to a model based prediction of some process outcome when there is no physical measurement of that outcome
Predictive modeling: The underlying models are learned from histories of the actual physical outcomes and process trace data Benefits:
Detect faulty wafers early Improve process control: from lot-to-lot wafer-to-wafer level Reduce physical measurements for process monitoring and control
2013 IBM Corporation
Process Monitoring and Quality Control (Semiconductor Manufacturing) - Performance of VM-enhanced process control
Simulation results for a given set of parameters: VM-EWMA : reduced process variance around 70% VM-LM : reduce process variance around 30% Given a target process variance, e.g. 0.03, we can reduce the measurement frequency VM-LM: 1 out of 6 wafers 1 out of 19 wafers VM-EWMA: 1 out of 6 wafers 1 out of 94 wafers
0.08
LM VM-EWMA VM-LM
LM:
VM-LM:
VM-EWMA:
100
150
Business goal: Early anomaly detection to avoid emergency stops of the system
Technical task: Detect anomalously behaving modules by comparing with previous normally-working state
# of sensors ~ 100
Technical hurdle: Na ve thresholding for individual sensors is hard since the system frequently changes its operational mode
Result: Detected about 60% of the serious faults that cannot be detected with conventional methods
intake pressure
intake pressure
Anaconda captures the interdependency pattern between variables, and detects a deviation from the normal pattern Example:
normal
faulty
IBM Anomaly Analyzer for Correlational Data (ANACONDA) leverages a unique dependency-based anomaly detection technology
ANACONDA monitors the dependency among variables
Setting a fixed threshold on individual variables leads to many false alerts for dynamic systems
Learns dependency patterns from past data under a normal condition Alert is raised if the present dependency is significantly different from the normal pattern
ANACONDA leverages sparse structure learning technique for dependency discovery Automatically discovers important dependencies among sensors
Dependency is indentified by building sensor-wise predictive models
Sensor6
Sensor1
Sensor6
Sensor1
Sensor5
Sensor2
Sensor5
Sensor2
Sensor4
Sensor3
Sensor4
Sensor3
Sensor1
Sensor2
, , Q&A
IBM
FAQ
, ,
INBOUND
VoC FAQ
2013 IBM Corporation
Smarter Planet
http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/kr/ko/overview/ideas/index.html
22
23
Transformed
, , , ,
Number Number
WEB LOG, , ,
, , ,
Text
Sound Signal Image Video
24
, , , ,
Number
Text
, , , , Feature , , Feature , ,
Number Number
25
IT System System IT
26
27
Big Data
28
Corporate Goals
Attract Grow Sales Sales Effectiveness Effectiveness Fraud Fraud Management Management Marketing Marketing
Retain
Fraud Risk
Analytical Foresight
Claims Profile
Customer Feedback
Customer LTV
Retention Risk
Fraud Risk
Best Offers
Customer Experience
Optimal Campaigns
Risk Assessment
Customer Interactions
Platform
Data Collection
Decision Optimization
Visualization
Base Services
Attitudinal Data
29
Interaction Data
Behavioral Data
Big Data
Administration
Admin Console
Integration
JDBC
Monitoring Netezza
DB2
Streams
Workload Optimization
Integrated Installer ZooKeeper Lucene Enhanced Security Oozie Pig Splittable Text Compression Jaql Hive Adaptive MapReduce Flexible Scheduler Index HCatalog DataStage
Guardium
MapReduce
Symphony
Symphony AE
Management
Security
Platform Computing
Cognos
HBase
Flume
Lineage
File System
HDFS
GPFS FPO
Sqoop
Open Source
IBM
31