Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
23
] [
] [
]
Our next calculation was an estimate of the total water-mass running through the soaker hoses
during operation. We were able to use this data, in combination with the weight of the fans and
frame, to make sure our chosen canopy could safely support the system.
( )( )
(
) ( )
) ()
Another calculation we had to make involved the horizontal loading of the wind from the fans.
Assuming a wind speed of 30mph, we calculated the thrust and in turn, the loading on the
structure.
(
) ( ) [
] (
) [
) [
]
[
]
Although experimentation is necessary to verify the stability of our structure, we could still form
an educated estimate for factor of safety. Because our canopy is not an engineered rigid
structure, it has no official snow or wind load ratings, but based on an engineered structure of
similar size (built by the same company), we found that that the roof supported 43 pounds per
square ft. Because our structure is not as heavy duty, we estimated a load rating of about 10
24
lbs/sq. ft. As long as the weight of our system is distributed evenly over the upper frame of the
canopy, this should be a reasonable estimate.
(
) ()()
( ( ))
( () )
We were given a range of rainfall rates for the simulator (0 to 6 in/hr). As a result, we needed to
convert rate of rainfall to required volumetric flow rate, based on the dimensions of our
simulator.
( )( )
(
) ()() [
] [
Each of these calculations was very beneficial in deciding upon which products to use, but
experimentation was necessary to verify the max wind speed and flow rates. These procedures
are detailed in the Test Procedure section.
8.3 Material and Material Selection Process
In order to assemble a rain simulator, we utilized many prefabricated and existing
components in order to reduce construction time and cost. Weight, cost, and strength were the
three most important aspects of material selection for the few remaining components that could
not utilize pre-existing products. Depending on the function of the structural component,
different factors carried more weight. For example, when deciding upon a material to support
the weight of the tractor, compressive strength was most important. With several strong
25
materials available, our second factor was cost. With a very low cost to strength ratio, the final
material selected to support the tractors weight was cinderblocks. Materials for other aspects of
the rain simulator were accessed as seen in Table 11 below.
Table 11: Material Selection Process
8.4 Component and Component Selection Process
The goal of our component selection was to find the components that, for the price, were most
cost-effective, easiest to work with, and either most durable or easiest to replace.
The frame for the rain simulator is a pre-fabricated, 10x15 ShelterLogic canopy. Our original
frame would have been fabricated out of aluminum piping and locking pins. After market
research, we determined that a pre-fabricated canopy would not only be easier to assemble and
cheaper, but it would also hold the piping and fans just as well.
The base is comprised of a wooden shell, waterproof tarp, and cinderblock track. A wooden shell
was chosen to accommodate for discrepancies between the advertised frame height and the
actual frame height during testing and to provide a sturdy support for the frame. A waterproof
tarp was chosen for ease of assembly and to ensure cheap water-holding capacity. Cinderblocks
were chosen to support the track because they are both economical and strong.
The water delivery system is comprised of a sump pump, in-line sediment filter, hoses, box fans,
and soaker hose. The sump pump and in-line filter were chosen for ease of assembly. Hoses were
chosen as a cheap alternative to pipes. Box fans were chosen for their low cost and ease of
replacement. Soaker hoses were chosen for their cheap droplet formation.
The main tradeoffs involved cost vs performance. Many of the ideal components for the rain
simulator cost much more than our entire budget. For example, the best pumps that can be found
online eclipsed $300. Through our research we were able to find a pump that performed almost
as well for 1/6 the price of the ideal pump. Another example was the oil collection system.
Rather than spend $500+ on expensive oil-water separator technology, we opted for cheap oil-
Part Selected Material Positives Negatives
Fan Support Structure Aluminum Piping Lightweight, Strong High Cost
Tractor Support Cinderblocks Strong, Low Cost Heavy
Water Containment
Sheet
Tarp
Strong, Low Cost,
Replacable
Potential
Low
Availability
Canopy
Support/Raisers
Wood Strong, Low Cost
Potential
Low
Durability
Grating Steel Grating Strong, Availability Heavy
26
collection sheets. Using research, outside-the-box thinking, and common sense, we are able to
slash our costs significantly.
Table 12: Component Selection Process
Part Selected Component Positives Negatives
Frame Pre-fabricated Canopy Easy to modify Lack of stiffness
Base Wooden Structure Easy to modify Bulky
Water Delivery Utility Pump Low cost, versatile None
Sediment Filter Low cost Doesnt filter oil
Hoses Flexible Minor Losses
Soaker Hose Even Distribution Lacks power
Oil Sheets Cost effective Not 100% effective
8.5 CAD Drawings
Figure 13 shows the detailed CAD drawing of the John Deere Rain Simulator. Included in this
drawing are the ShelterLogic canopy, base constructed of wood, tractor supports constructed of
cinder blocks and wood, two service ramps, wind simulators constructed of PVC and box fans,
and soaker hose winding across the canopy frame. Not included in this view is the pump, filters,
connecting hose, wiring, voltage regulator, tarp, and canopy cover. These were excluded as they
did not affect the major dimensions of the system. The canopy cover can fully enclose the
canopy, and open in the front to allow tractor entrance. Holes may be needed in the top for wind
circulation. The tarp will lie within the base using towels or other soft material as a cushion to
prevent tears. The pump will be submersed in the water below the tractor.
27
Figure 13: Detailed CAD Drawing
28
Figure 14: Close up of wind simulators
Each individual wind simulator is constructed of two box fans mounted to the shelter frame
using 1.5 PVC pipe. The grey connecting components are two 2 PVC tees cemented
orthogonally. The oversized tees allow for lateral movement and rotation of each pair of fans.
The fans will be rotated by winding rope around one end of the axle pipe, pulling from either
direction, and securing the rope to a lower support.
The base will be constructed of 20 long
4x4 pressure treated wood blocks and
various lengths of 2x4 wood. Figure 15
shows holes where dowels can be used to
secure the base, allowing easy assembly and
disassembly. After the canopy is secured on
top of the base, it will be raised 20 to allow
for maximum sized tractors to fit below.
Detailed drawings of each component can be
found in Appendix F.
Figure 15: Close up of Base Construction
29
8.6 Testing Procedure
In order to verify that the rain simulator is capable of meeting requirements, several tests will be
conducted to verify the appropriate parameters.
8.6.1 Procedure for Testing the Maximum Wind Speed
1. Assemble and wire the fan array on the top of the frame.
2. Point all fans in the same direction.
3. Using an anemometer, record average wind speed at various locations within the
rain simulator. Make sure all fans are set to their max wind speed setting.
4. Record wind speed for at least four locations at three different distances from the
fans. (4 locations at 1 ft, 4 locations at 5 ft, 4 locations at frame base).
5. Create a table of average wind speeds for each distance, and a final average
maximum wind speed. Compare to theoretical fan wind speed.
8.6.2 Procedure for Testing Rainfall Volume
1. Use a single soaker hose and measure its length. Attach the hose to a utility
pump, and suspend the hose 10ft above the pump.
2. Place the pump in a basin of water of which original volume of water is known,
and turn on the pump. At the same time, begin a stopwatch.
3. Turn off the pump after five minutes has passed. Record the new volume of water
in the lower basin. Use this information to find the change in volume of water
with time, and calculate the resulting inches per hour of rainfall in the full-scale
simulator. Perform several tests and average the results.
4. Repeat Steps 1-3 with a segment of rope-lined PVC pipe.
8.6.3 Base Testing Procedure
It is imperative that the rain simulator's base be tested to make sure that it can support the full
range of tractors to be tested. Here is the procedure for testing the base:
1. Transport Rain Simulator base and several tractors of various size to a flat field
2. Set up the ramps and base of the Rain Simulator in desired location
3. Slowly drive the smallest tractor onto the base and see if base is stable.
4. Drive tractor off the base and make sure the base's structural integrity is upheld
5. Drive tractors onto the base one at a time in order from lightest to heaviest.
6. Drive each tractor off and make sure the base is not compromised. Stop if the
bases integrity was compromised by the loading from the previous tractor.
8.6.4 Procedure of test on the accuracy of voltage adjuster to vary the wind speed
One of our customer needs is being accurate. We are using fans to simulate wind from 0 to 30
mph. As a result, the accuracy of our wind speed is important in our project.
1. Attach the voltage adjuster to the fan
2. Measure the distance from fan to raindrop simulator device in the real model. For
30
instance, X meter
3. Set the wind speed meter X meter away from the fan
4. Twist the voltage adjuster several times in small increments, read the wind speed
meter, mark the actual speed if necessary
5. Turn off the fan and wind speed meter
6. Redo step 4 with speeds that marked to see if they are still the same
8.6.5 Procedure of test on the accuracy of valve to vary the rainfall rate
Also important to test the tractors is the rainfall rate. This is adjusted using valves for the soaker
hoses.
1. Attach flow meter to water line.
2. Completely open valve to guarantee correct full flow
3. Close the valve 1/3 of the way and make note of the flow rate and the valve position
4. Close the valve another 1/3 and again make note of the flow rate and valve position
5. Tweak the valve positions to ensure 1/3 reductions of flow rate for each position
8.7 Economic Analyses - Budget and Vendor Purchase Information
Included in this section is our current bill of materials. It takes into account the initial budget in
appendix 4 and the changes we have made from our initial budget.
31
Table 13: Bill of Materials
Component Dimension Unit Purchased Materials Total cost
Frame 0
Canopy (Shelterlogic Autoshelter 1015) 1 290.95 290.95
Wind simulator 0
Fan 6 128 128
Voltage adjust 0 0 0
PVC pipe mounted fans 1-1/2inx80in 3 16.47 16.47
PVC pipe mount to frame 1 1/2inx59.5in 6 22.08 22.08
2 in PVC Tee 2in 12 35.52 35.52
The thing that fix the angle 0
Raindrop simulator 0
Soaker hose 1 6.02 6.02
Rope Cotton Cord 1 1.84 1.84
Base 0
Cinder Block 8inx8inx16 12 17.52 17.52
Pressure Treated Lumber 72.16 72.16
Outer raiser 4inx4inx20in 8 0
Inner raiser 4inx4inx20in 4 0
Corner wall 2inx4inx57.5in 8 0
End wall 2inx4inx51in 8 0
Side wall 2inx4inx59.5in 4 0
Other 0
Ramp 2 0 0
Filter (Culligan House Water Filter HD-950A) 1 64.99 64.99
Pump (Ace 1/6 HP Utility Pump) 1 66.99 66.99
Other cost 100 100
0
Total Cost 822.54 822.54
Refrence
http://www.acehardware.com/home/index.jsp
http://www.ecanopy.com/
http://www.mscdirect.com/
http://www.lowes.com/
32
Table 14: Budget 4/8/2014
9.0 Final Discussion
9.0.1 Introduction no change
9.0.2 Customer Needs no change
9.0.3 External Search no change
9.0.4 Engineering Specifications
After testing in Augusta, Georgia demonstrated that the fan assembly was ineffective,
John Deere indicated that the 0-45 angle and 0-30mph wind speed requirements were no longer
required. Simulation of vertical rainfall from 0-6 in/hr is the only rainfall specification.
9.0.5 Concept Generation and Selection no change
9.0.6 System Level Design
Based on our observations at the John Deere testing facility in Augusta, Georgia, we
determined that fans were inadequate for directing rainfall. The fans used in the overhead
configuration did not have an effect on the angle or speed of the rain. Further testing was done
using a large industrial fan supplied by John Deere which failed to produce noticeable changes in
Amount($) Location Date
Beginning Budget 1000
1 17.49 ACE 2/25/2014
2 128 MSC Online
3 290.95 ECanopy Online
4 49.88 Home Depot 3/24/2014
5 12.69 Home Depot 3/24/2014
6 45.28 Home Depot 3/25/2014
7 49.07 Home Depot 3/25/2014
8 43.96 Home Depot 3/25/2014
9 40 Home Depot 3/25/2014
10 13.81 Home Depot 3/25/2014
11 45.2 ACE 3/26/2014
12 42.47 ACE 3/26/2014
13 37.48 Home Depot 3/27/2014
14
15
Ending Budget 183.72
33
angle or speed of the rainfall. Considering the inability of the fans to produce the rainfall
requirements, it was decided that the wind simulation was no longer required and the current fan
configuration would be excluded from the final design.
9.0.7 Special Topics
Updated the Gantt Chart, Budget, and BOM to include new materials and updated
designs.
9.0.8 Detailed Design
Testing in Augusta, Georgia revealed that our current single continuous hose
configurations created kinks and a large pressure drop. This was evident because of a dramatic
uneven distribution of rain fall. In order to create an even pressure through the length of the
simulator, two parallel PVC pipes were used to create a uniform pressure down the length of the
simulator. The soaker hose was cut into sections and was secured to the pipes in a parallel
configuration. The hose sections were secured using barbs and hose ties, which were sealed with
silicone to prevent leaks.
The cinderblock and wood plank track system was more complex and unwieldy than the
rubber tracks supplied by John Deere. As a result, the rubber tracks will rest on top of the tarp
for the final design.
9.1 Construction Process
9.2 Test Results and Discussion
10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
11.0 Self-Assessment (Design Criteria Satisfaction)
Based upon the requirements initially set by our sponsor, our team met many important
goals in our design. We created a working simulator which was easily transportable, simple to
assemble, filtered and recycled water, was accurate, and was within budget. Although we could
not complete a system for changing water speed and direction in our allotted time and budget, we
build a successful piece of equipment upon which future designs can be added.
Our project is unique because it is not intended to be a mass produced product. Instead,
John Deere will use the simulator to test new prototypes. Because of this, function over form has
been key. Although John Deere may wish to alter our design in the future, we have made sure
that the core functions of accuracy, portability, usability and self-containment are upheld.
34
11.1 Customer Needs Assessment
Our final design meets the all of the revised customer needs. Initially, John Deere
wanted a rain simulator that could create wind speeds from 0-30 mph causing rain to fall from
0-45 from vertical. After alpha prototype testing in Augusta, it was concluded by John Deere
engineers and the members of the Capstone team that the current fan set up would not be
adequate for wind simulation. As a result, the customer needs were modified to focus on
simulating natural vertical rainfall. The 0-6 in/hr requirement still applied, as well as the size
requirements. With a flow meter attached downstream of the filter, our pump was pushing 5.3
gal/min. With our area of rainfall, a gallon per minutes equals roughly an inch per hour of
simulated rainfall. This falls within 1 in/hr of the maximum of 6 in/hr required.
It was recommended to John Deere to add an additional pump to increase flow rate and
even the pressure in the soaker hoses. Also, possible future plans at John Deere are to add high
pressure cone nozzles that could be secured at different spots of the structure to simulate desired
wind speed and angle.
11.2 Global and Societal Needs Assessment
Global and Societal needs are based on the environmental impact of building and running
a rain simulator along and the lessons learned during the project that can be used by other people
in the world with the same needs.
Any design improvements or changes would strictly benefit John Deere. With that being
said, there are many changes that can be done. The design could be scaled for their larger tractors
and could also be made a permanent fixture if needed.
The global needs of the rain simulator involve environmental impact. The fabrication of
the rain simulator proved environmentally friendly. Running the rain simulator has little
environmental impact as long as any oil from the tractor is absorbed and the used water is
disposed of down a proper drain.
Appendix A Patents
35
WO2005063001 A1 - Rain simulator for environmental studies
This invention relates to a rain simulator which is used to carry out environmental
studies. The inventive simulator is based on a combined structure comprising a fixed
part and a mobile part. The mobile structure moves from side to side so as to be
positioned sequentially over plots of land or surfaces of a determined width in order to
wet. The tubes bearing sprinklers or nozzles are fixed to the cables forming the mobile
structure, and nozzles are supplied by means of a general supply system.
CN101912832 A - Self-controllable wind-induced rain load simulation experimental device for
buildings
A wind-induced rain load simulation experimental device for buildings comprising a
water tank, water pump and separator, an array of spray heads attached to cross
beams, and a frame. Each spray head is connected with a horizontal rotary motor for
spray simulation.
CN202587987 U - Artificial rain-making simulating device
An artificial rain making device comprising a rain-making system, a circulating water
supply system and a supporting frame. The rain-making system comprises a rain-
making plate, reflection plate, and nozzle pipes.
US6945468 B1 Rainfall simulation apparatus
A rainfall simulation apparatus and structure comprising an electric pump, riser pipe, V-
shaped aperture-containing trough connected to roof, and elongated collection bin
below the trough and connected to the pump. The rainfall simulation apparatus has
particular utility in connection with providing the relaxing acoustic effect of rainfall on a
structure while additionally providing the visual effect of rainfall through the windows
of the structure.
US5137214 A - Method and apparatus for creating artificial rain
An artificial rain creating apparatus using spray nozzles and a vertical planar collection
sheet. A water tank supplies water under pressure to an overhead manifold which
feeds water to a plurality of spray nozzles. The spray nozzles spray a horizontal fan of
water onto a vertical collection sheet. The water then runs to the bottom of the
collection sheet which contains pointed teeth, and water droplets are formed from each
tooth.
36
Appendix B Concepts
Concept 1 Fans blowing through mesh screen
37
Concept 2: Fans mounted on rotating axis
38
Concept 3: Multiple tractor entry points for different angled tests
39
Concept 4: Rotatable perforated tube
40
Concept 5: Fans with multiple rotating axis
Concept 6: Fan attachment to sides of structure
41
Appendix C Gantt Chart
42
43
Appendix D Initial Budget
Our initial budget is meant to reflect our first attempt at calculating the total cost of our rain
simulator. It does not include travel expenses. A 30% contingency has been added in case
modifications are needed.
Item Cost
Frame Material $400
Basin Material $30
Ramp $40
Oil Collection $40
Grating $150
Piping $25
Pump $100
Hose attachment $10
Fans $150
Side Skirting $75
Mesh $10
Other Hardware $50
30% Contingency $324
Total $1404
Appendix E Bill of Materials
Part # Part Name Part Source Price Quantity Total Cost
M-CPVC57-30MIL 5' x 7' Clear Vinyl Tarp - 30 MIL tarpsplus.com 64.75 4 259
2534T12 8' Steel Clamp-on framing fittings McMaster-Carr 11.65 16 186.4
44155K88 Oil Absorbing Pillows McMaster-Carr 35.67 1 35.67
4892K95 1.5" PVC pipe McMaster-Carr 10.79 2 21.58
4880K25 90 Elbows, Female Unthreaded Socket Ends McMaster-Carr 1.16 10 11.6
T9FB430490 8' X 10'' Heavy Duty Black/Silver Tarp globalindustrial.com 16.75 2 33.5
Irrigation Pump ACE Hardware $50 1 50
T9F258323 Floor Fan 12 Inch - Global Industrial globalindustrial.com $44 4 176
85385T11 Corrosion-Resistant Type 304 Stainless Steel Wire Cloth McMaster-Carr $39.91 4 159.64
Other Hardware McMaster-Carr $50 1 50
603635 2 in. x 4 in. x 16 ft. Douglas Fir Lumber Home Depot 7.86 20 157.2
44
Appendix F Detailed CAD Drawings
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Appendix G Team Resumes
Justin R. Frazier jrf5222@psu.edu
3017 Steven Martin Drive, Fairfax, VA 22031 703-474-5939
EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering May, 2014
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 3.11 GPA
TECHNICAL SKILLS:
Engineering Design: Component design, Process Flows, AutoCAD, Solidworks, Open-Source 3D printing
Computer Expertise: Excel, Statistics, basic Java, ACSPL+ Motion Control, Image Pro Plus, Matlab
Testing Proficiency: wind and water tunnel testing, laser profilometry and velociometry, material testing
Proven ability in technical writing, team leadership, and conflict resolution
Professional knowledge in statics, dynamic systems, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, and material science
RELEVANT WORK EXPERIENCE
Project Engineer, MeadWestvaco Paperboard Division, Covington, VA Jan-May 2013
Supported engineers with the construction of a $300 million biomass power plant
Engineered all Lock-out Tag-out procedures for a power boiler and turbine generator
Created lubrication routes for boiler equipment
Audited boiler equipment, worked with contractors to ensure safe working conditions
Paper Science Researcher, MeadWestvaco Paperboard Division, Richmond, VA May-Aug 2013
Automated a new piece of laboratory equipment capable of imitating high-speed automation
Developed a method of calibration for paperboard creasing equipment
Created experiments to study the effects of creasing on paperboard properties
Quantified a measurement for the amount of cracking in a paper crease
Camp Counselor, Fairfax County Park Authority, Fairfax, VA Summers of 2010-2012
Supervised early teens and younger as part of the Fairfax County Summer Recreation program
Planned daily camp activities and details involving safety, allergies, and costs.
Maximized facility usage and regularly adapted to changes in plans
Math Tutor, Penn State, taught elementary math through Calculus I Oct 2010-Apr 2011
OTHER EXPERIENCE AND AWARDS:
Eagle Scout Project. Led 3 dozen Boy Scouts in a project to collect bicycles for charity. Planned the project
and presented details to Troop and District authorities. Secured funding, moving van, and use of school
facilities. Organized and led Scouts in implementing the project which collected 75 bicycles and monetary
donations totaling $750.
Mechanical Engineering and Systems Engineering. Designed and built a working tabletop wind
turbine. Solved problems regarding system efficiency, material selection, and industrial fabrication. Performed
research by analyzing data to draw conclusions about real problems and events such as infrastructure corrosion
and the September 11th attacks.
Mechanical Systems Maintenance and repair. Fixed an air compressor with no prior knowledge of the
subject. Repaired bicycles, specifically drivetrains, brake systems, and chains. Performed preventative
maintenance and tested for proper operation prior to returning each bicycle to owner.
AWARDS/LEADERSHIP
Eagle Scout, Boy Scouts of America, 2009
Deans List, Fall Semester, 2013
Order of the Arrow, Boy Scouts of America, 2007
John Philip Souza Band Award, Paul VI High School, 2009
57
58
59
Sean W. Munck
616 E. College Avenue, Apt. 506, State College, PA 16801
Phone: 717 713 0815 Email: swm5376@psu.edu
____________________________________________________________________________
Education: The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
Expected Graduation: August 2014
Current GPA: 3.40 / 4.00
Semester Exchange Program Fall 2013
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Awards: Bricker James Memorial Engineering Scholarship 2010-2014
Deans List 2011
Relevant Courses: Internal Combustion Engines, Heat Transfer (including Lab), ME Design
Methodology, Senior Capstone Design Project
Work ACE Hardware May 2013-Current
Experience: - Sales Associate
- Organized, constructed and sold ACE products
- Assisted customers with household projects and repairs
TAG Trailers / Lion Launch Pad June 2012-Dec 2012
- Intern
- Used SolidWorks to design new components for an electric bicycle
trailer
- Assisted with prototype trailer fabrication
- Designed new business logo
- Camp Counselor
Camp Pemigewassett (Sleep-away Camp) June 2011-Aug 2011
- Managed a cabin of eight campers full-time
- Worked and lived at camp for eight week session
- Coached boys basketball and baseball teams
- Taught woodshop classes, served camper meals
Computer Skills: MS Office, MATLAB, HTML, SolidWorks
Activities: OPPerations THON Committee, Four Diamonds Fund
- Volunteer for student-run pediatric cancer charity
- Blue Love Chairperson
Aeromodelers Association of Pennsylvania
- Builder/Flyer of model airplanes
Penn State University Cycling Club
- Member, competitor in cycling competitions
60