Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Objectives:
i. To define the noise problem and provide the source for a noise
measurement and control plan.
ii. To identify the specific noise sources within the area.
iii. To draw a layout of the area with machinery location.
iv. To sketch noise contours of below 80dB(A), 80dB(A) to 84dB(A),
85dB(A) to 89dB(A) and 90dB(A) and above on the layout plan.
v. To determine whether any of the employees are exposed to noise
greater than action level of 85 dB(A) at a particular workplace.
Introduction:
Physically, there is no difference between sound and noise. Sound is a
sensory perception and noise corresponds to undesired sound. By extension,
noise is any unwarranted disturbance within a useful frequency band (NIOSH,
1991). Noise is present in every human activity, and when assessing its
impact on human well-being it is usually classified either as occupational
noise (i.e. noise in the workplace), or as environmental noise, which includes
noise in all other settings, whether at the community, residential, or
domestic level (e.g. traffic, playgrounds, sports, music) (de Hollander et al.,
2004).
Problem Statement:
The review of the literature indicates that noise has a series of health effects,
in addition to hearing impairment. Some of these, such as sleep deprivation,
are important in the context of environmental noise, but are less likely to be
associated with noise in the workplace. Other consequences of workplace
noise, such as annoyance, hypertension, disturbance of psychosocial well-
being, and psychiatric disorders have also been described (de Hollander et
al., 2004).
Methodology:
The area monitoring was conducted at Utusan Melayu factory in Bangi,
Selangor which performed at 30th September 2009. A walk-through assessment was done
first by all group members in order to define the noise problem and the source for noise
measurement and control plan. Once the source was identified, then the layout of the area with
machinery location is drawn. The data which come out from the instrument used were jotted
down. Then, the noise contours of below 80 dB(A), 80 dB(A) to 84 dB(A), 85 dB(A) to 89
dB(A), and 90 dB(A) and above were sketched on the plan which later are colored for
identification.
Instrument:
Sound Pro Quest SLM was used along our assessment in order to identify the
sound level of noise around the source (machine) that generates hazardous
levels of noise.
Quality Control:
The SLM was calibrated first according to the user manual using “Quest
Standard Calibrator” before use. When measuring the noise emitted from
the machine, background noise was taken into consideration. Background
noise was measured when the machine was turned off while the sound level
of machine was measured when the machine was turned on. The sound
level obtained will be corrected using a curve provided in the user manual to
eliminate the background noise
Results:
i) To define the noise problem and provide the source for a noise
measurement and control plan.
Based on our walk-through assessment, we managed to identify the
machine as the source of noise. Noise level surround the machine were
around 80 dB(A) to 90 dB(A).
The working area (WA) that the worker have to be is divided into WA1 and
WA3 which noise exposure are in range 80 dB(A) to 84 dB(A) while the WA2
is in range 85 dB(A) to 89 dB(A). There are two workers were working at
WA1, two worker were working at WA2 and six to eight worker were perform
their work at WA3.
The wall
Scale
Scale is
is 11 cm
cm :: 11 m
m
WA 2
WA 3
WA 1
v) To determine whether any of the employees are exposed to noise
greater than action level of 85 dB(A) at a particular workplace.
Since there are two workers whose perform their work at WA2 which noise
exposure is range between 85 dB(A) to 89 dB(A), thus both of them are
exposed to noise greater than action level. There are no any worker who
work at area with 90 dB(A) and above based on our observation during work-
through survey.
Discussion:
The assessment of noise exposure monitoring was done successfully by
making a noise contour mapping based on the data and information given
from reading which directly shown on the screen of Sound Pro Quest SLM on
30th September 2009 (the day where the assessment was done). This result
is actually totally depends on the working conditions during the days. This is
because, although there are lot of operational machines such as for printing
and transferring the paper, but not the entire machine were runs
simultaneously.
In our point of view and also based on our study, we are assume that,
if there are lot of machines were operated in the same time, the noise
exposure level might be arise over the action level at 85 dB(A) or possibly
exceed than Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) at 90 dB(A) or above. But,
since there is only one machine was operated on that time (period of the
assessment was done), thus the noise exposure level might be possibly low
and acceptable. However, if this result was not complied with daily
occupational noise exposure, then this report can be considered as null and
void.
Based on the result, there are only two routine workers which exposed
to noise exposure which greater than action level of 85 dB(A). Therefore,
there is need for periodic personal noise exposure monitoring to be carried
out for them in order to indicate the extent of the severity of an employee’s
noise exposure.
concrete
wall
Thus, the employees than were provided with ear muff. However, they
claim that the ear muff likely to gift some stress towards their head (bone
around ears) which causing headache since they need to used it almost 8
hours per day. Then, the employees were provided other type of ear plug
which likely more preferable (although less efficient from the first one). But
still, most of the workers still not use the PPE given because they might not
aware about their health especially the hearing site which might be possibly
affected day by day because of expose to noise (which sometime reach
action level or exceed PEL)routinely.
Recommendations:
There is some recommendation that we would like to suggest for the
employer for this Utusan Melayu factory which listed as below. However, if
not practicable the suggestion can be neglected.
Since there are only involve a small range of worker around the
machine, may be the exposure duration of the employee can be decreased
by applying a work-shift. However, if all of these are not practicable, the
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) should be introduced.
Type of PPE is hearing protection devices (HPDs) which are earplugs and earmuffs.
Earplugs can be made of foam or a polymer. Foam plugs are shaped like small cylinders that you
roll and compress then insert into your ear canal. Polymer plugs are "rubbery" and have flanges
or fins. Earmuffs have a cup design with noise dampened cushions that surround the ear to seal
off noise. Some earmuffs are designed to accommodate hardhats. Some allow radio
communication with others who have the same type of earmuffs. Custom earplugs are custom-
made for your ears by an audiologist. Custom earplugs are comfortable and provide maximum
protection.
However, the factory should choose an appropriate noise reduction rating of the ear plug.
NRR is the greatest amount of sound reduction that a hearing protection device can provide. A
higher NRR decibel (dB) rating means a greater amount of noise reduction. For example, an
earplug with a noise reduction rating of 29 dB provides more protection than an NRR 25 earplug.
We would like to suggest the appropriate NRR is NRR 20 which can reduce the exposure toward
noise until 83.5 dB(A) ≈ 84 dB(A), which is under action level for noise.
Conclusion:
Our assessment of noise exposure of area monitoring which done at Utusan
Melayu factory have indicated that most point of measurement are in range
between 80 dB(A) to 84 dB(A) which no further routine monitoring will be
required for that particular area. However, for the area which noise exposure
level above action level of 85 dB(A) likes WA2, further personal noise
monitoring must be carried out for those workers to indicate the extent of
the severity of an employee’s noise exposure by using noise dosimeter
(NDM) instrument (under the Factories and Machinery (Noise Exposure)
Regulation 1989).
References:
1) Part 380. Occupational Noise Exposure (online). Retrieved September
4, 2009 from The Department of Labor & Economic Growth, Michigan
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Available at
http://www.michigan.gov/mioshastandards