Design of asphalt pavements for Hot Arid Climates design of asphalt Mixtures. Current ways to specify asphalt mixture properties: Marshall Mix design, Hveem mix design, Texas Gyratory mix design, empirical testing methods. Superpave Mix Design Strategic Highway Research Program 5 year, $50 million research on asphalt Products, A system performance based system for "binders"
Descrição original:
Título original
11-Design of Asphalt Pavements for Hot Arid Climates_1
Design of asphalt pavements for Hot Arid Climates design of asphalt Mixtures. Current ways to specify asphalt mixture properties: Marshall Mix design, Hveem mix design, Texas Gyratory mix design, empirical testing methods. Superpave Mix Design Strategic Highway Research Program 5 year, $50 million research on asphalt Products, A system performance based system for "binders"
Design of asphalt pavements for Hot Arid Climates design of asphalt Mixtures. Current ways to specify asphalt mixture properties: Marshall Mix design, Hveem mix design, Texas Gyratory mix design, empirical testing methods. Superpave Mix Design Strategic Highway Research Program 5 year, $50 million research on asphalt Products, A system performance based system for "binders"
for Hot Arid Climates for Hot Arid Climates Design of Asphalt Mixtures Design of Pavement Structure 2 Design of Asphalt Mixtures Current ways to specify asphalt mixture properties: Marshall Mix Design Hveem Mix Design Texas Gyratory Mix Design Empirical Testing Methods 3 Marshall Mix Design AASHTO T245 Features: impact compaction density/void analysis stability/flow testing 4 Marshall Mix Design Advantages: Attention to volumetric properties for durability Equipment inexpensive and portable Disadvantages: Impact compaction unrealistic Marshall stability not related to performance 5 Hveem Mix Design AASHTO T247 Features: kneading compaction density/voids analysis stability analysis swell analysis 6 Hveem Mix Design Advantages: Kneading compaction simulates field compaction Hveem stability measures aggregate component of shear strength Disadvantages: equipment more expensive and not portable some volumetric properties not emphasized asphalt content selection very subjective 7 Texas Gyratory Mix Design Features: Gyratory compaction density/voids analysis Hveem stability analysis 8 Texas Gyratory Mix Design Advantages: Gyratory compactor simulates field compaction Gyratory compactor is portable Hveem stability measures aggregate component of shear strength Attention to volumetric properties for durability Disadvantages: Gyratory compactor relatively expensive some Gyratory protocol needs refining 9 Empirical Strength Testing Primarily Rolling Wheel Tests Addendum to Traditional Mix Design Accept / Reject Criteria 10 Empirical Strength Testing Advantages: criteria calibrated to experience with real pavements Disadvantages: expensive equipment expensive to run time consuming to calibrate criteria only applicable to local conditions affected by boundary conditions actual performance not predicted 11 Superpave Mix Design Strategic Highway Research Program 5 year, $50 million research on asphalt Products, A system Performance based spec for binders Performance based system for asphalt mixture design and analysis SUPERPAVE software 12 Superpave Mix Design Selection of Asphalt Binder Performance Graded Binder PG Selection of Aggregate Structure Consensus properties, source properties, aggregate structure Mix Design (Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3) 13 Superpave Mix Design Adoption of Superpave to Hot Arid Climates: Selection of Binder (Temperature) Performance Testing (Field Conditions)