The elbow is an inherently stable joint because of its bony articulation and surrounding capsuloligamentous structures. Our study was performed to detail the gross anatomy of the elbow capsule. Clinical relevance Greater understanding of elbow capsule gross anatomy may lead to improved understanding of acute and chronic elbow pathoanatomy.
The elbow is an inherently stable joint because of its bony articulation and surrounding capsuloligamentous structures. Our study was performed to detail the gross anatomy of the elbow capsule. Clinical relevance Greater understanding of elbow capsule gross anatomy may lead to improved understanding of acute and chronic elbow pathoanatomy.
The elbow is an inherently stable joint because of its bony articulation and surrounding capsuloligamentous structures. Our study was performed to detail the gross anatomy of the elbow capsule. Clinical relevance Greater understanding of elbow capsule gross anatomy may lead to improved understanding of acute and chronic elbow pathoanatomy.
ACadaveric Study Lee M. Reichel, MD, Omar A. Morales, MD Purpose The elbow is an inherently stable joint because of its bony articulation and sur- rounding capsuloligamentous structures. Anatomic and biomechanical studies have focused on the medial and lateral collateral ligamentous contributions to stability. In 1918, Gray provided a qualitative description of the elbow capsule and its bers. Our study was performed to detail the gross anatomy of the elbow capsule. Methods We evaluated the elbow capsule of 6 paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens to detail gross capsular anatomy. Results We identied 3 distinct bands within the anterior capsule and 3 distinct bands within the posterior capsule. Conclusions Further study is needed to delineate the functional meaning of these anatomic ndings. Clinical relevance Greater understanding of elbow capsule gross anatomy may lead to im- proved understanding of acute and chronic elbow pathoanatomy and treatment modalities. (J Hand Surg 2013;38A:110116. Copyright 2013 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.) Key words Anterior elbow capsule, elbow anatomy, elbow capsule, elbow stability, posterior elbow capsule. T HE ELBOW IS an inherently stable joint because of its bony articulation and surrounding capsu- loligamentous structures. Anatomic and biome- chanical studies have focused on the medial and lateral collateral ligamentous contributions to elbow stability, but a paucity of literature exists regarding the anatomy and function of the elbow capsule excluding the collat- eral ligaments. It has been noted that oblique and trans- verse brous bands exist in the anterior capsule of the elbow. 1 Clinically, the elbow capsule is an important contributor in the development of posttraumatic elbow contractures and acutely has been used to augment stability in complex elbow fracture dislocations with coronoid fractures. To better understand this structure, which encompasses the entire elbowjoint, we evaluated the capsular gross anatomy of 6 paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows. MATERIALS AND METHODS We dissected 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows (average age, 73 y; 4 female and 2 male) of all structures except the capsuloligamentous covering. None of the specimens had evidence of prior surgery or injury to the elbow. We noted distinct grossly identiable anatomic capsular bands ex- cluding the medial and lateral collateral ligamentous com- plexes on each specimen. We measured the lengths of each structure. The authors performed all measurements and agreed on them. Using a digital caliper with a resolu- tion of 0.01 mm and accuracy of 0.1 mm, measurements were repeated and averaged for each dened structure. We Fromthe Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Ben Taub General Hospital, Houston, TX. Receivedfor publicationJuly 12, 2012; acceptedinrevisedformSeptember 25, 2012. The authors thank Scotty Bolleter, Chief, Ofce of Clinical Direction, Centre for Emergency Health Sciences, Bulverde SpringBranchEmergency Medical Service. No benets in any formhave been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. Correspondingauthor: LeeM. Reichel, MD, Departmentof OrthopedicSurgery, Baylor Collegeof Medicine, Ben Taub General Hospital, 1504 Taub Loop, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: leereichel@gmail.com. 0363-5023/13/38A01-0019$36.00/0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.031 110 ASSH Published by Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. took anterior capsular band measurements in full extension and took posterior capsular band measurements in full exion to maximize respective lengths. In 3 specimens, the entire elbowwas painted with black paint, and we resected the elbow capsuloligamentous structures, creating a nega- tive template of the capsular dimensions for visualization purposes only. 2 Before any painting, we then measured midline distances from proximal to distal of the entire anterior and posterior capsule in both full exion and full extension. We detailed gross anatomical descriptions of the elbow capsule. We measured average lengths of distinct identi- able bands of the anterior and posterior capsule and cal- culated gross percent excursion (percent difference in cap- sular length in full exion vs extension) of the anterior and posterior capsule in full extension and exion. RESULTS Anterior capsule We identied 3 bands on all specimens. One band originated on the anterior lateral surface of the distal humerus near the lateral supracondylar ridge and con- tinued distal to insert on the anterior superior annular ligament. We dened this band as the anterior lateral band. A second band originated at the anterior medial side of the elbow near the lateral part of the superior medial trochlear ridge and continued laterally and dis- tally to insert on the anterior central and medial annular FIGURE 1: Anterior lateral, anterior medial oblique, and anterior transverse bands of the anterior capsule. TABLE 1. Raw Length Measurement (Average) of Anterior Capsular Bands, Lateral, Medial Oblique, and Transverse Specimen Anterior Lateral Band (mm) Anterior Medial Oblique Band (mm) Anterior Transverse Band (mm) 1a 19.3 16.0 34.5 1b 24.4 23.3 35.3 2a 20.7 18.9 36.4 2b 18.4 15.1 38.3 3a 16.0 23.0 28.0 3b 15.5 15.3 26.7 4a 16.1 17.4 30.1 4b 18.2 22.0 24.8 5a 17.5 18.0 28.0 5b 19.9 28.9 25.9 6a 17.6 19.2 25.2 6b 15.6 17.9 19.7 Average 18 20 29 ANATOMY OF ELBOW CAPSULE 111 JHS
Vol A, January ligament. We dened this band as the anterior medial oblique band. The third band was a transverse band crossing the elbow medially to laterally from the central and inferior anterior medial trochlear ridge to the ante- rior medial annular ligament. It also gave a contribution insertion distal to the coronoid tip. We dened this band as the anterior transverse band. In 2 of 12 specimens (1 matched pair), the anterior transverse band was nar- rower and thicker and had an appearance of an acces- sory annular ligament, except that it originated from the anterior capsule rather than the ulna, but there was a distinct separation from the annular ligament. These ndings were consistent in the 12 specimens (Fig. 1). Although all specimens contained each of the bands, there was variability in their degree of development. In general, the anterior lateral band was the least substan- tial and well developed compared with the anterior medial oblique and anterior transverse bands. Table 1 presents individual lengths. The anterior lateral band averaged 18 mm in length, the anterior medial oblique band averaged 20 mm, and anterior transverse band measured 29 mm. In full extension, the mean midline distance from the most proximal capsular attachment on the humerus to the most distal capsular attachment on the anterior ulna in full extension measured 50.2 mm, and 14.2 mm in full exion. This corresponded to a 28% excursion of the anterior capsule in the midline. Posterior capsule The posterior capsule also had 3 distinct bands (Fig. 2). A transverse band crossed inferior to the olecranon fossa frommedial to lateral, originating and inserting on the medial and lateral posterior trochlear ridges. The other 2 bands were opposing bands, 1 originating at the medial posterior trochlear ridge and the other originat- ing at the lateral posterior trochlear ridge, both inserting on the posterior superior ridge of the olecranon tip. These 3 bands formed an inverted triangular shape. We dened these bands as the posterior transverse, poste- rior medial oblique, and posterior lateral oblique. Table 2 presents individual lengths of the posterior bands. The posterior transverse band length averaged 21 mm. The posterior medial oblique band, measured from the posterior medial origin to its ulnar insertion, averaged 18 mm in length. The posterior lateral band, FIGURE 2: Posterior transverse, posterior medial oblique, and posterior lateral oblique bands, which lie at the distal portion of the olecranon fossa. TABLE 2. Raw Length Measurements of Posterior Capsular Bands, Transverse, Medial Oblique, and Lateral Oblique Specimen Transverse Band (mm) Medial Oblique Band (mm) Lateral Oblique Band (mm) 1a 24.0 20.0 18.0 1b 24.0 21.0 18.2 2a 21.0 17.8 15.1 2b 24.0 19.2 15.3 3a 18.0 16.0 18.0 3b 17.5 15.9 12.4 4a 20.8 13.3 15.9 4b 19.8 17.0 20.5 5a 24.7 19.6 20.8 5b 20.6 17.3 20.7 6a 19.4 18.2 20.1 6b 21.0 15.5 13.9 Average 21 18 17 112 ANATOMY OF ELBOW CAPSULE JHS
Vol A, January measured from the lateral humeral origin to the ulnar insertion, averaged 17 mm in length. The midline posterior capsular distance averaged 9.7 mm in full extension and 42.5 mm in full exion (Fig. 3). This corresponded to a 23% excursion of the pos- terior capsule in the midline. DISCUSSION Anatomic studies of the elbow osseous, capsuloligamen- tous, and muscular structures have been well documented, but there is a paucity of literature detailing the anatomy of the elbow capsule and its function. In 1918, Gray 3 pro- vided a detailed qualitative description of the elbow cap- sule, which he referred to as the anterior ligament and posterior ligament, and provided a description of bands similar to this report but without quantifying the structures and with different nomenclature. Regarding the anterior capsule, Gray stated, Its supercial bers pass obliquely from the medial epicondyle of the humerus to the annular ligament. The middle bers, vertical in direction, pass from the upper part of the coronoid depression and be- come partly blended with the preceding, but are inserted mainly into the anterior surface of the coronoid process. The deep or transverse set intersects these at right angles. Gray described the posterior capsule: This posterior lig- ament is thin and membranous, and consists of transverse and oblique bers. . . . It is attached to the humerus imme- diately behind the capitulum and close to the medial mar- gin of the trochlea, to the margins of the olecranon fossa, and to the back of the lateral epicondyle some distance fromthe trochlea. Below, it is xed to the upper and lateral margins of the olecranon. . . . Transverse bers form a strong band which bridges across the olecranon fossa; under cover of this band a pouch of synovial membrane and a pad of fat project into the upper part of the fossa when the joint is extended. Morrey noted the anterior capsule inserts proximally above the coronoid and radial fossae. Distally, the capsule attaches to the anterior margin of the coronoid medially as well as the annular ligament laterally. 1 He also described the anterior capsule as a thin transparent structure with strength provided by transverse and obliquely directed brous bands. King et al 4 reported that the anterior capsule has transverse and obliquely directed bands that have signicant strength and provide an important stabilizing effect when the capsule becomes taut in extension. The posterior capsule similarly becomes taut in exion and may also have an important role as a static stabilizer in this position. Morrey and An 5 dem- onstrated the importance of the anterior capsule as a stabilizer to varus stress and demonstrated that the anterior capsule contributed 32% resistance to varus stress and 85% of resistance to distraction in full extension. The focus of this anatomic cadaveric study was to describe the gross anatomy of the anterior and posterior capsular bands, excluding the medial and lateral collat- eral ligaments. Three distinct bands have been identi- ed on the anterior capsule of each specimen: the an- FIGURE 3: Anterior and posterior view of a painted specimen with the capsule excised, demonstrating the area covered by the capsule. ANATOMY OF ELBOW CAPSULE 113 JHS
Vol A, January terior lateral band, anterior medial oblique band, and anterior transverse band. Each of these bands had a primary insertion point on annular ligament. In most specimens, the anterior transverse band also inserted on the coronoid tip as it crossed. Although we did not evaluate them in this study, anterior capsular insertion points on the annular ligament and coronoid process and the behavior of the anterior capsule in various amounts of exion may explain why capsular repair to the footprint of a coronoid fracture in complex elbow fracture dislocations may help provide stability to the elbow. 6 Studies are needed to evaluate what portion of the anterior capsule and in what degree of elbowexion the capsule should be xed to the footprint of a coro- noid fracture. In addition, in 2 specimens (1 matched pair), the anterior transverse band was narrower and thicker and had the appearance of an accessory annular ligament, except that it originated from the anterior capsule rather than the ulna, but there was a distinct separation from the annular ligament. We also identied 3 bands in the posterior capsule: the posterior transverse, posterior medial, and posterior lateral bands. These bands formed an inverted triangle inferior to the olecranon fossa attaching from the humerus to the posterior superior ridge of the olecranon tip. The posterior capsule extended proximal to the olecranon fossa, but the 3 identiable bands resided inferior to the fossa. They became tight in exion and bunched up into the superior portion of the olecranon fossa superior to the olecranon tip when the elbow was extended. Based on their anatomical course, the anterior bands may function as secondary ligamentous stabilizers of the lateral collateral ligament, keeping the radial head (and proximal radius and ulna) held anterior in a check- rein fashion when the annular ligament is competent. This is evident during elbow extension, because they are visualized becoming taut, but this is only an obser- vation. Biomechanical and sectioning studies are needed to demonstrate the contribution of the anterior capsular bands to elbowstability. In addition, tightening FIGURE 4: Anterior capsular redundancy from extension to exion. 114 ANATOMY OF ELBOW CAPSULE JHS
Vol A, January of the anterior capsule and ligamentous bands in exten- sion may function to counteract hyperextension of the elbow, preventing the ulna from levering out of the trochlea when the olecranon tip contacts with the olec- ranon fossa. Conversely, the posterior bands were taut in exion and may prevent the ulna from levering off the trochlea during hyperexion. Safran and Baillar- geon 7 postulated that the posterior capsule may serve as a restraint to exion and posterior directed forces. From extension to exion, there was a considerable redundancy in anterior capsule, which folded on itself to accommodate the shortened distance in exion (Fig. 4). The excursion of the anterior capsule was approxi- mately 28% from exion to extension. This observation may be relevant to capsular repair in terrible triad inju- ries. The location of suture placement in the capsule and the amount of elbowexion at time of suture placement may greatly affect how tight the repair is. Conversely, from exion to extension, the posterior capsule folded on itself in the olecranon fossa superior to the tip of the olecranon in full extension (Fig. 5). We calculated pos- terior capsular excursion of 23%. We saw discrete bands in all specimens but reported only band lengths because they could reliably and re- producibly be measured with visual inspection. We did not report band widths because band width was variable along the course of the band and there was no reliable way to reproducibly obtain measurements. We mea- sured capsular bands in specimens with intact capsules; therefore, we did not measure capsular thickness. Dis- rupting the capsule to measure thickness would result in folding and redundancy, making thickness measurements unreliable in this study. Small length differences were attributed to differences in the specimen sizes (ie, large specimens had longer lengths), but calculating averages minimized these differences across all specimens. Clearly, this is a small sample size, and examination of more specimens might reveal other anatomical vari- ations. In addition, because we performed the dissec- tions and measurements together, we calculated no in- traobserver or interobserver error. This cadaveric study demonstrated the presence of 3 distinct bands present in both the anterior capsule and posterior capsule, excluding the medial and lateral collat- eral ligaments. Their functional contribution has not been evaluated. Based on their anatomic course (origin on the humerus and insertion on the annular ligament, which is an attachment point for the lateral collateral ligament), we presume that the anterior capsular bands are important secondary ligamentous stabilizers to the annular ligament and lateral collateral ligament, as well as a checkrein to hyperextension of the elbow joint. Posterior ligaments FIGURE 5: Posterior capsular redundancy from exion to extension. ANATOMY OF ELBOW CAPSULE 115 JHS
Vol A, January structures are presumed to function as a checkrein coun- tering hyperexion. More study is needed to dene the contribution of these bands to elbow stability. REFERENCES 1. Morrey B. Anatomy of the elbow joint. In: Morrey B, Sanchez-Sotelo J, eds. The Elbow and Its Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2009:1823. 2. Fuss FK. The ulnar collateral ligament of the human elbow joint: anatomy, function, and biomechanics. J Anat. 1991;(175):203212. 3. Gray H. Grays Anatomy. 20th ed. New York, NY: Lea & Febiger; 1918:321322. 4. King G, Morrey BF, An K. Stabilizers of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1993;2(3):165174. 5. Morrey BF, An K. Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11(5): 315319. 6. Cage DJ, Abrams RA, Callahan JJ, Botte MJ. Soft tissue attachements of the ulnar coronoid process: an anatomic study with radiographic correlations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(320):154158. 7. Safran MR, Baillargeon D. Soft-tissue stabilizers of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1 suppl S):S179S185. 116 ANATOMY OF ELBOW CAPSULE JHS