Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
calcareous stones
Margherita Stefania Sciolti
1
, Maria Antonietta Aiello
, Mariaenrica Frigione
2
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Via per Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 21 October 2011
Received in revised form 15 February 2012
Accepted 2 March 2012
Available online 13 March 2012
Keywords:
A. Polymermatrix composites (PMCs)
B. Debonding
B. Environmental degradation
D. Mechanical testing
Calcareous stones
a b s t r a c t
In this paper the effect of a long term immersion in water on bond durability is analyzed when FRPs (Fiber
Reinforced Plastic) are externally applied to a masonry substrate. In the performed research a substrate
made by natural calcareous stones, strengthened by CFRP (Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic) sheets has
been analyzed. For a better comprehension of water effect on the adhesive bond between stone and CFRP,
the same treatments were performed to the constituent materials, namely epoxy resins, CFRP sheets and
stones. To this aim mechanical tests were carried out on stone, composite materials and epoxy resins
before and after their immersion in water, evaluating the effects of this agent on the properties of the
materials. The inuence of the aging in water on the interface stone-reinforcement was analyzed in terms
of bond strength, maximum bond stress, optimal bond length, slip-bond stress relationship and mode of
failure. In addition the possibility of calibrating design relationships, taking into account the inuence of
environmental conditions is discussed. Detailed results on adhesives and composites aged in water have
been reported in a previous paper while in the present work the signicant decay of the mechanical prop-
erties of the stone is specically investigated. With regard to the conditioning treatment a reduction of
the bond strength has been observed (up to 26%) as well as a similar decrease of the maximum bond
stress; in addition the aged specimens have shown a more fragile behavior. On the basis of the obtained
results the empirical coefcient, reported in the available Italian Guidelines, to determine the FRP-
masonry bond strength seems still effective when the system FRP-masonry is aged in water once the
properties of the aged materials are considered in the provided relationships.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The need of structural interventions on masonry constructions
is increasing in the recent years for several reasons: the low sus-
tainability of demolition and reconstruction instead of repairing,
the high vulnerability to seismic actions experienced during earth-
quakes, the changed usage that requires structural upgrading, the
importance of conservation when referring to buildings of archi-
tectural and historical value. Traditional techniques for both global
and local interventions are generally based on the use of steel and
reinforced concrete: steel ties are considered for connecting struc-
tural elements or for eliminating thrust of arches and vaults; injec-
tions of mortar or reinforced grouted perforations are employed to
repair damaged masonry or upgrading masonry structures under
both gravity and seismic loads; very common is also the applica-
tion of single or double reinforced concrete leaves to improve
stiffness and strength; nally the introduction of additional struc-
tural elements (reinforced concrete walls or steel bracing) is con-
sidered for bearing horizontal actions. The testing by time and
the deeper knowledge of the structural behavior, mostly under
seismic actions, evidenced the main weakness of the traditional
techniques: the durability aspects when using steel; the increased
mass when concrete or reinforced concrete is applied, involving
higher gravity loads and, thus, rising seismic forces. Other draw-
backs are related to aesthetic and functionality because of the pos-
sible obstruction of new areas, long time of interventions and
therefore of activities interruption, conservation when referring
to historical buildings and monuments. The last issue is of great
relevance for constructions supervised by the National Ofces for
Historical Heritage Preservation, for which the compatibility and
reversibility of interventions are primarily addressed.
In the last decade, the use of FRP composites for repair and/or
upgrading existing building has been proved an effective solution,
able to overcome some of the drawbacks experienced with tradi-
tional interventions. Several scientic works have been devoted
to the use of FRP on existing concrete structures, the most recent
founds being reported in [14], as well as different codes or
guidelines are available in many countries [510]. The application
1359-8368/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.002
h
p
Primer 0 0 48.8 2.4 3.02 0.69 0.35 0.11
8 37 25.2 1.3 1.24 0.11 0.36 0.03
13 47 24.8 1.3 1.49 0.12 0.38 0.02
27 67 17.6 3.0 0.89 0.23 0.37 0.07
Adhesive 0 0 44.3 4.7 2.95 0.26 0.31 0.04
8 37 33.8 3.6 1.88 0.35 0.33 0.01
14 48 28.0 6.2 2.04 0.34 0.41 0.06
29 70 24.0 2.8 1.20 0.14 0.39 0.03
CFRP 0 0 2319
a
216 198.84 27.10
10 41 1879 711 306.45 113.00
14 48 1685 636 234.93 144.78
25 65 2034 539 221.74 20.83
29 70 1630 713 262.92 44.84
a
Curing time = 36 weeks.
Fig. 3. Moisture absorption curves of the compression and bending specimen.
Table 3
Mechanical properties of the stones (Lecces stone) after immersion in water; the
percentage reduction of the mechanical properties after the treatment is reported
within the parentheses.
Immersion time Compressive strength (MPa)
(weeks)
h
p
0 0 31 2
14 48 14 1 (54.8)
25 65 13 2 (57.4)
Secant elastic modulus (MPa)
// \
0 0 22,542 3102 18,144 1773
8 37 12,299 798(45.4) 9816 1017(45.9)
17 54 13,615 3615(39.6) 9850 1295(46.7)
Flexural strength (MPa)
// \
0 0 8.2 0.8 7.3 1.0
8 37 4.9 0.5 (40.1) 4.8 0.5 (34.6)
17 53 4.6 0.2 (44.0) 3.9 0.4 (47.0)
23 62 4.8 0.5 (42.1) 4.8 0.4 (34.2)
M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250 3243
performed here considering as negligible the strain values equal to
0.001 e
0
, being e
0
the strain of the unbounded sheet, and at load
levels less than 50% F
max
.
Whit regard to the maximum bond stress and the optimal bond
length, the corresponding average values registered on both the
applied sheets are reported in Table 4 for each specimen.
The ultimate load has been determined by halving the applied
load, in the hypothesis of symmetric behavior at the two opposite
sides of the specimen. For the unaged specimens the average value
for two identical specimens are reported.
Results reported in Table 4 show that the ultimate load, re-
corded in standard conditions, is higher than that corresponding
to aged specimens. The average decay of bond strength is of 23%
and 26% for specimens tested after 8 weeks and 25 weeks of
immersion in water, respectively; on the other hand its degrada-
tion seems to be independent on the immersion period, at least
referring to the performed analysis. This result appears basically
related to the decay of mechanical properties of the substrate, as
further conrmed in the following. In fact, for both aged and un-
aged specimens, the failure occurred by debonding of the FRP rein-
forcement from the substrate at the masonry face-level, with a thin
layer of calcarenite stone remaining attached to the delaminated
sheet (Fig. 4). Such kind of failure is expected when the tensile
strength of the adhesive at the interface is higher than that of
the substrate [11,46]. Analyzing the properties of materials ob-
tained in the present investigation and reported in Tables 2 and
3, it is evident as the mechanical performances of the substrate
is very much lower than those of the resins, although the relevant
decay of the strength and the elastic modulus registered after
immersion in water for both the primer and the adhesive.
With reference to the almost negligible decay of bond strength
observed between 8 weeks and 25 weeks of immersion in water it
can be justied by the similar trend observed for the decay of
materials properties.
A similar result is observed for the maximum bond stress and
the corresponding applied load. In fact, the average maximum
bond stress evaluated considering all aged specimens is
2.23 0.37, corresponding to an average load value of 5.11 0.49,
with a decrease of 22% with respect to the maximum bond stress
of control specimens.
On the other hand the interface stiffness seems unaffected by
the conditioning treatment, in agreement with results reported
in [24,25], in spite of the plasticization effect expected in the resin
[24,25,38]. In fact, the optimal bond length is almost the same for
aged and unaged specimens, the average value determined for all
specimens is 112 mm 11 mm (COV = 10%). Furthermore, compar-
ing the strain values measured along the sheet, at load levels below
60% of the ultimate load, for aged and unaged specimens, the scat-
ters appears negligible, conrming again the slight variability of
the stiffness under service condition. Typical strain paths are re-
ported in the Fig. 5, where the strains distribution is fairly expo-
nential regardless of the aging regime.
Specically in Fig. 5a and b the comparison between the strains
path along the reinforcing sheet recorded for unaged specimens
and specimens tested after 8 weeks and 25 weeks of immersion
in water, is drawn respectively: The load levels analyzed in the g-
ures correspond to 35% and 50% of the ultimate load.
In the Fig. 6, the strain values versus applied load are plotted at
different strain gauges (e
i
, i = 0 7) positions, for both aged and
unaged specimens. Results are reported for clarity referring to
the average value of those recorded at the two sides of each spec-
imen. The curves show that at low load level the stress is almost
completely transferred to a small length of the sheet, near the
loaded end; when the applied load increases and the de-bonding
at the loaded end starts, the optimal bond length is shifted along
the sheet. This occurrence is enough clear analyzing the curves re-
ported in the Fig. 6, where a sudden increase of strain is registered
at the delamination starting by strain gauges applied near the
loaded end; at the same time the strain values rise in other
positions, where an almost zero value of strain was maintained be-
fore the delamination starting.
In the Figs. 7 and 8 results obtained for specimens after immer-
sion in water are compared with those of specimens in standard
conditions. The mechanisms of stresses and strains transfer at
Table 4
Bond test results.
Names specimens F
max
(kN) s
max
(MPa) Fs
max
(kN) l
e
(mm)
0w 9.83 2.87 6.75 124
18w 7.67 2.72 5.61 96
28w 7.49 1.95 4.71 121
125w 7.10 1.95 5.03 110
225w 7.46 2.18 5.72 118
Fig. 4. Typical failure for both aged and unaged specimens.
3244 M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250
the interface are similar, as before explained. However the load
level corresponding to the debonding initiation (marked in the
Figs. 68) is lower for aged specimens. In addition a more fragile
behavior can be evidenced after the immersion in water, due to
the short extension of the non-linear stage. In fact, the load value
corresponding to the attainment of the maximum bond stress is
equal to 70% and 60% of the ultimate load for aged and unaged
specimens, respectively.In order to evaluate the slip at the inter-
face the strain values registered along the sheet are utilized. In par-
ticular, referring to a small length of the sheet, dx, and imposing
the strains compatibility the following relationship is obtained:
ds
dx
e
s
x e
b
x 2
where s is the slip between stone and reinforcement, e
s
the strain
value within the sheet, e
b
is the strain value within the stone block.
Neglecting the stone deformability and the slip value at the un-
loaded end of the sheet, the slip at the loaded end is evaluated as:
s
Z
L
0
e
s
xdx 3
Using strains measured at discrete points along the sheet, the
approximate slip value can be determined as follows:
s
P
i
e
s
i
Dx
i
4
being e
s
i
the recorded strain and Dx
i
the sheet length between two
contiguous strain gages.
The bond stresses distribution within the reinforcement have
been evaluated imposing the translational equilibrium condition
of the sheet length Dx:
sx t
s
E
s
e
s
i
e
s
i1
x
i1
x
i
5
where s(x) is the bond stress in position x measured from the
loaded end of the sheet, e
s
i
; e
s
i1
is the strain values in correspon-
dence of two contiguous strain gages; x
i
, x
i+1
is the position of two
contiguous strain gages measured from the loaded end of the sheet;
t
s
is the thickness of the sheet glued at the stones surface; E
s
is the
elastic modulus of the sheet, determined on the basis of strain
values registered on the unbonded sheet of the tested specimens,
as reported in more details in previous works [2,3,36,45].
In the Fig. 9 the average bond stressslip curves are drawn for
aged and unaged specimens. In the rst stage a linear trend can
be observed in all cases, up to the maximum bond stress is at-
tained. When analyzing the system stiffness G
a
/s (G
a
= shear mod-
ulus of adhesive, s = adhesive thickness) the difference between
aged and unaged specimens are negligible, as already discussed
above. On the other hand, a different behavior after the attainment
of the maximum bond stress can be observed; in fact, for speci-
mens left in standard conditions, a greater extension of the post-
peak curve is obtained with an ultimate slip value of about
0.12 mm, indeed almost 30% higher than that found for aged spec-
imens. This last result further conrms the more fragile failure of
the interface caused by the aging in water.
4. Design relationships
As well known, when strengthening stone blocks by FRP com-
posites, a premature mechanismof failure may occur by debonding
(loss of bond). The delamination, as for concrete substrate, may
take place within the adhesive, between stone and adhesive, with-
in the stone itself, or within the FRP reinforcement. [11]. When
Fig. 5. Strains values along the sheet at different load levels varying the time of immersion in water: (a) control specimens and specimens tested after 8 weeks of immersion
in water. (b) control specimens and specimens tested after 25 weeks of immersion in water.
M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250 3245
proper installation is performed, debonding is expected within the
substrate, because the adhesive strength is typically much higher
than the stone tensile strength. Therefore the sheet delaminates
removing a thin layer of the substrate, whose thickness may range
from few millimeters to more relevant stone portions [11].
Experimental bond tests, performed on masonry elements, show
that the bond capacity, namely the ultimate value of the force trans-
ferred from FRP reinforcement to the support prior debonding, de-
pends on the bond length, l
b
, growing with l
b
up to a maximum
bond length, l
e
. In fact a further increase of the bond length does
not involve a higher bonding force to be transferred. The length l
e
is the so called optimal bond length and corresponds to the min-
imal bond length able to carry out the maximum anchorage force.
In addition, the bond strength varies depending on the mechanical
properties of the stone and FRP [11]; therefore, a decay of the bond
capacity is expected while a mechanical degradation of the materi-
als occurs. Some available codes and guidelines [11,7] suggest the
introduction of environmental coefcients to take into account
the material degradation while evaluating the reinforcement
mechanical properties; however, these environmental coefcients
are not considered when determining the bond strength. In other
cases [5] the protection of the strengthened structural element is
only advised.
In order to evaluate the inuence of water immersion on bond
capacity, the relationships provided by the CNR-DT 200/2004 Bul-
letin [11] are calibrated on the basis of experimental results.When
Fig. 6. Strain values versus applied load at different strain gauges (e
i
, i = 0 7) positions: (a) specimens in standard conditions; (b) and (c) specimens tested after 8 weeks of
immersion in water. (d) and (e) specimens tested after 25 weeks of immersion in water.
3246 M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250
Fig. 6 (continued)
Fig. 7. Comparison between strains distribution of specimens immersed in water for 8 weeks and specimens left in standard condition: (a) specimen 18w and (b) specimen
28w.
M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250 3247
debonding involves the rst masonry layers and the bond length is
longer or equal to the optimal bond length, the maximum value of
the transferred force, F
max
, shall be expressed as follows [11]:
F
max
b
s
2t
s
E
s
C
F
p
6
where b
s
is width of the sheet glued at the stones surface and the
value, C
F
, of the specic fracture energy is given as:
C
F
c
1
f
m
f
mtm
p
7
where c
1
is an experimentally determined coefcient, f
m
is the aver-
age strength of calcareous stone, f
mtm
is the average tensile strength
of calcareous stone.
From Eq. (6) the specic fracture energy, C
F
, can be evaluated:
C
F
F
2
max
b
2
s
2t
s
E
s
8
Fig. 8. Comparison between strains distribution of specimens immersed in water for 25 weeks and specimens left in standard conditions: (a) specimen 125w and
(b) specimen 225w.
Fig. 9. Experimental bond stressslip curves at loaded ends for different specimens.
Table 5
c
1a
, c
1b
values.
Names specimens c
1a
c
1b
0w 0.017 0.017
18w 0.010 0.018
28w 0.010 0.017
125w 0.009 0.016
225w 0.009 0.017
3248 M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250
By using Eqs. (7) and (8) the c
1
value can be expressed as:
c
1
F
2
max
b
2
s
2ts Es
f
m
f
mtm
p 9
On the basis of experimental results two values of c
1
were cal-
ibrated. The former (c
1a
) was obtained introducing in Eq. (9) the
materials properties, referred to standard conditions while the sec-
ond coefcient (c
1b
) was calibrated by employing in Eq. (9) the
properties of aged materials. Obtained results are reported in Table
5.
From Table 5 it can be observed that the c
1b
coefcient is almost
constant and equal to 0.017 with a coefcient of variation of 6%,
while the c
1a
coefcient for aged specimens resulted 43% lower
than that evaluated for unaged ones. In standard condition, the
suggested value for c
1
is 0.015 [11]; therefore for design purposes
available relationships for the evaluation of bond strength seem
still effective when the interface substrate reinforcement is ex-
posed to the adverse effect of water, once the decay of the mechan-
ical properties of materials are taken into account. It also evident as
a signicant reduction of the c
1
(almost 40%) coefcient should be
introduced in the Eq. (7) when only the materials properties in
standard conditions are available, at least for the kind of substrate
and treatment investigated.
5. Conclusion
The bond behavior of calcareous stones strengthened by FRP
sheets was analyzed by a double lap shear test after aging in water;
the treatment in water was extended to each utilized material,
namely substrate, epoxy and composite. The mechanical behavior
of the substrate after the aging in water is presented and discussed
in this paper while the effects of the water on epoxy and composite
was detailed in a previous paper. The bond between the stone sub-
strate and the CFRP sheet has been investigated in terms of bond
strength, maximum bond stress, optimal bond length, strains path
at the interface and bond stressslip law. Some considerations
about the possible extension of available relationships to the bond
strength evaluation in presence of water have been also given.
On the basis of results obtained the following considerations
can be remarked:
The mechanical properties of the utilized natural stones are sig-
nicantly affected by the presence of water, with a reductions in
stiffness and strength of about 50%.
A decay of the maximum bond stress and of the bond strength
has been observed (up to 26%), as well as a more fragile bond
behavior in the case of conditioned specimens. In all cases the
debonding involved the rst masonry layers, due to the weak-
ness of the substrate with respect to the reinforcing system,
both in standard conditions and after the aging in water.
The optimal bond length resulted almost unaffected by the
aging in water, its value averaged on all specimens is
112 mm. Therefore the water seems to have little inuence on
the stiffness of the interface, as conrmed also through the
analysis of the strains path along the sheet during loading. In
fact, the strain values measured along the sheet, at load levels
below 60% of the ultimate load, for aged and unaged specimens,
were enough similar.
The bond stressslip curves have been evaluated for aged and
unaged specimens. In the rst stage an almost linear trend, up
to the maximum bond stress was attained in all cases; the dif-
ference between aged and unaged specimens resulted negligi-
ble in terms of initial stiffness, as already discussed above. On
the other hand a different behavior after the attainment of the
maximum bond stress has been observed; in fact for specimens
left in standard conditions a greater extension of the post-peak
curve was obtained.
The available relationship, provided by the Italian Technical
document [11] for evaluating the bond strength in standard
conditions, seems still effective in the case of aged specimens,
once the decay of the mechanical properties of the utilized
materials is considered. Otherwise an appropriate environmen-
tal coefcient should be added for taking into account the
reduction of the bond strength.
In conclusion, the obtained results clearly evidence the need of
an accurate evaluation of the bond behavior when adverse envi-
ronmental condition, as the presence of water/moisture, are fore-
seen during the service life of FRP strengthened masonry
structures. Even if further investigations are needed and interest-
ing, the performed research furnishes a rst contribute to the
understanding of the durability of bond in presence of water when
the substrate is made by calcareous natural stones. In addition a
short term analysis is suggested, namely after a period of immer-
sion in water for few hours, in order to accurately dene the satu-
ration period of the analyzed stone and the inuence of water on
bond behavior when the weakest component of the system (the
stone) is still unsaturated.
References
[1] In: Lieping Ye, Peng Feng, Qingrui Yue, editors. Proceedings of the fth
international conference on FRP composites in civil engineering, vol. I, FRP for
future structures; 2010.
[2] In: Lieping Ye, Peng Feng, Qingrui Yue, editors. Proceedings of the fth
international conference on FRP composites in civil engineering, vol. II, FRP
strengthening structures; 2010.
[3] In: Claire Whysall, Dr. Halliwell Sue, Dr. Toby Mottram J, editors. Advanced
composites in construction (ACIC) 2011 conference proceedings; 2011.
[4] Proceedings 10th international symposium on ber reinforced polymer
reinforcement for concrete structures (FRPRCS-10); 2011.
[5] Fdration International du Bton (b) Bulletin No. 14. Externally bonded FRP
reinforcement for RC structures; 2001. 138 pp [ISBN 2-88394-054-1].
[6] Fdration International du Bton (b) Bulletin No. 35. Retrotting of concrete
structures by externally bonded FRPs, with emphasis on seismic applications;
2006. 220 pp [ISBN 978-2-88394-075-8].
[7] ACI 440.2R-08. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP
systems for strengthening concrete structures. American Concrete Institute,
Farmington Hills, MI; 2008.
[8] JSCE. Recommendation for upgrading of concrete structures with use of
continuous ber sheets. Concrete Engineering Series 41, Japan Society of Civil
Engineers, Tokyo, Japan; 2001.
[9] ISIS Design Manual No. 4. Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Structures with
ExternallyBonded Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRPs). ISIS Canada.
[10] TR55. Design guidance for strengthening concrete structures using bre
composite materials. The Concrete Society, UK; 2004.
[11] CNR-DT_200/2004 English. Guide for the design and construction of externally
bonded FRP systems for strengthening existing structures.
[12] Aiello MA, Sciolti MS. Analysis of bond performance between frp sheets and
calcarenite stones under service and ultimate conditions. J Masonry Int
2008;21(1):1528 [BMS editor].
[13] Aiello MA, Sciolti MS, Triantallou TC. FRP-strengthened masonry: bond
aspects. In: Int proc of FRPRC-8 international conference, Patras, Greece, CD;
2007.
[14] Ceroni F, Pecce M, Manfredi G, Marcari A. Experimental bond behavior in
masonry elements externally reinforced with FRP laminates. In: Int Proc of the
conf Composites in Constructions CCC2003, Cosenza, Italy, Editoriale Bios;
2003.
[15] Capozucca R. Experimental FRP/SRPhistoric masonry delamination. Compos
Struct 2010;92:891903.
[16] Willis CR, Yang Q, Seracino R, Grifth MC. Bond behaviour of FRP-to-clay brick
masonry joints. Eng Struct 2009;31:25807.
[17] Khoshbakht M, Lin MW, Berman JB. Analysis of moisture-induced stresses in
an FRP composites reinforced masonry structure. Finite Elem Anal Des
2006;42:41429.
[18] Lin MW, Berman JB, Khoshbakht M, Feickert CA, Abatan AO. Modeling of
moisture migration in an FRP reinforced masonry structure. Build Environ
2006;41:64656.
[19] Khoshbakht M, Lin MW, Feickert CA. A nite element model for hygrothermal
analysis of masonry walls with FRP reinforcement. Finite Elem Anal Des
2009;45:5118.
M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250 3249
[20] Khoshbakht M, Lin MW. A nite element model for hygro-thermo-mechanical
analysis of masonry walls with FRP reinforcement. Finite Elem Anal Des
2010;46:78391.
[21] Ouyang Z, Wan B. Numerical simulation of bond deterioration between CFRP
plate and concrete in moisture environment. In: Third international
conference on FRP composites in civil engineering (CICE 2006). December
1315 2006, Miami, Florida, USA; 2006. p. 3958.
[22] Ouyang Z, Wan B. Experimental and numerical study of water effect on bond
fracture energy between FRP and concrete in moist environments. J Reinf Plast
Compos 2008;27(2):20523.
[23] Ouyang Z, Wan B. Modeling of moisture diffusion in externally FRP
strengthened concrete specimens. J Compos Const 2008;12:42534.
[24] Ouyang Z, Wan B. An analytical model of FRP-concrete bond deterioration in
moist environment. Adv Struct Eng 2009;12:7619.
[25] Ouyang Z, Wan B. Nonlinear deterioration model for bond interfacial fracture
energy of FRP-concrete joints in moist environments. J Compos Constr
2009;13:5363.
[26] Chajes MJ, Thomson Jr TA, Farschman CA. Durability of concrete beams
externally reinforced with composite fabrics. Constr Build Mater 1995;9:
1418.
[27] Karbhari VM, Engineer M, Eckel II DA. On the durability of composite
rehabilitation schemes for concrete: use of a peel test. J Mater Sci 1997;32:
14756.
[28] Toutanji HA, Gomez W. Durability characteristics of concrete beams externally
bonded with FRP composite sheets. Cem Concr Compos 1997;19:3518.
[29] Karbhari VM, Zhao L. Issues related to composite plating and environmental
exposure effects on composite-concrete interface in external strengthening.
Compos Struct 1998;40:293304.
[30] Mukhopadhyaya P, Swamy RN, Lynsdale CJ. Inuence of aggressive exposure
conditions on the behavior of adhesive bonded concrete-GFRP joints. Constr
Build Mater 1998;12:42746.
[31] Leung H, Balendran R, Lim C. Flexural capacity of strengthened concrete beam
exposed to different environmental conditions. In: Proc int conf of FRP
composites in civil engineering, Hong Kong. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science;
2001. p. 1597606.
[32] Davalos JF, Kodkani SS, Ray I, Boyajian DM. A fracture mechanics approach for
interface durability of bonded FRP to concrete. In: Proc 7th int symp on ber-
reinforced (FRP) polymer reinforcement for concrete structures. Kansas City,
Mo, ACI, Farmingdale Hills, Mich; 2005. p. 146580.
[33] Grace NF, Singh SB. Durability evaluation of carbon ber-reinforced polymer
strengthened concrete beams: experimental study and design. ACI Struct J
2005;102:4053.
[34] Wan B, Petrou MF, Harries KA. Effect of the presence of water on the
durability of bond between CFRP and concrete. J Reinf Plast Compos
2006;25:87590.
[35] Tuakta C, Bykztrk O. Deterioration of FRP/concrete bond system under
variable moisture conditions quantied by fracture mechanics. Compos B Eng
2010;42:14554.
[36] Lai WL, Kou SC, Poon CS, Tsang WF, Lai CC. Effects of elevated water
temperatures on interfacial delaminations, failure modes and shear strength in
externally-bonded CFRP-concrete beams using infrared thermography, gray-
scale images and direct shear test. Constr Build Mater 2009;23:315260.
[37] Lau D, Buyukozturk O. Fracture characterization of concrete/epoxy interface
affected by moisture. Mech Mater 2010;42:103142.
[38] Sciolti MS, Frigione M, Aiello MA. Wet lay-up manufactured FRPs for concrete
and masonry repair. Inuence of water on the properties of composites and of
their epoxy components. ASCE J Compos Constr 2010;14(6):82333.
[39] DellAnna L, Laviano R. Penisola Salentina: stato delle conoscenze
mineralogiche e geochimiche. In atti convegno Le conoscenze geologiche
del territorio salentino, Lecce, 1987, Quaderni Ricerche Centro Studi Geotecnici
DIngegneria, 11, Lecce; 1987. p. 30321.
[40] Calia A, Mecchi A, Luprano VAM, Rubino G, Rota P. Microseismic tests in the
analysis and characterization of high porosity stone materials. In: Proceedings
of 6th international conference on non-destructive testing and microanalysis
for the diagnostics and conservation of the cultural and environmental
heritage, Roma; 1999.
[41] Frigione M, Maffezzoli A, Luprano VAM. Correlation between ultrasonic and
static mechanical properties during curing of cold-curing epoxy adhesives. J
Polym Eng 2001;21(5):44568.
[42] Frigione M, Lettieri M, Mecchi AM. Environmental effects on epoxy adesive
employed for restoration of historical buildings. ASCE J Mater Civil Eng 2006;
18:71522.
[43] Norme Italiane Ottobre 1990 EDILIZIA UNI 97243:1990 Materiali
lapidei. Determinazione della resistenza a compressione semplice.
[44] Norme Italiane Ottobre 1990 EDILIZIA UNI 97245:1990 Materiali
lapidei. Determinazione della resistenza a essione.
[45] Norme Italiane Gennaio 1992 EDILIZIA UNI 97248:1992 Materiali
lapidei. Determinazione del modulo elastico semplice (monoassiale).
[46] Aiello MA, Sciolti MS. Bond analysis of masonry structures strengthened with
CFRP sheets. J Constr Build Mater 2006;20:90100 [Elsevier].
[47] ASTM D 638M. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics; 1996.
[48] ASTM D 3039M. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix
composite materials; 2000.
[49] ASTM D57098. Standard test method for water absorption of plastics; 1998.
[50] Cultrone G, Sebastia E, Huertas M. Durability of masonry systems: a laboratory
study. Constr Build Mater 2007;21:4051.
[51] Calia A, Mecchi AM, Quarta G. A research into some intrinsic parameters
materials to the durability of highly porous building stones. In: 9th
international congress on the deterioration and conservation of stone.
Venice; 2000. p. 4957.
[52] Calcaterra D, Langella A, De Gennaro R, De Gennaro M, Cappelletti P. Piperno
from Campi Flegrei: a relevant stone in the historical and monumental
heritage of Naples (Italy). Environ Geol 2005;47(3):34152.
[53] Aiello MA, Sciolti MS. Masonry structures strengthened with FRP sheets:
experimental investigation of bond between FRP laminates and ashlars. Int J
Restor Build Monument 2003;9(6):63962.
3250 M.S. Sciolti et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 32393250